Next Article in Journal
Editorial: Advancing the Frontiers of Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in Research and Clinical Practice
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Structure Influences Case Processing: Electrophysiological Insights from Hindi Light Verb Constructions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Phonological Feature Posteriors and Cue-Specific Accent Perception in Hindi- and Tamil-Accented English

by
Nitin Venkateswaran
and
Ratree Wayland
*,†
Department of Linguistics, Turlington Hall, University of Florida, P.O. Box 115454, Gainesville, FL 32611-5454, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(2), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020177 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 January 2026 / Revised: 28 January 2026 / Accepted: 29 January 2026 / Published: 31 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Language Perception and Processing)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accented speech reflects systematic deviation from target-language phonetic norms. This study demonstrates that perceived accent strength covaries with selective, gradient differences in phonological feature realization. We examine whether perceived accents in Hindi- and Tamil-accented English reflect uniform segmental deviation or cue-specific patterns of phonological feature realization. Methods: English speech produced by native speakers of Hindi and Tamil was evaluated using native listener accentedness ratings. Phonetic variation was analyzed using posterior probabilities of phonological features derived from a machine learning model, Phonet. The analyses focused on liquids (laterals and rhotics (e.g., /l/, /ɭ/, and /ɻ/) and labial segments in the fricative–glide space (e.g., /v/, /w/, and /ʋ/), with attention to word position and feature-level generalization. Results: Accentedness ratings differed systematically for Hindi- and Tamil-accented English and covaried with a subset of phonological feature dimensions, yielding contrast- and context-specific patterns of perceptually relevant variation. Not all features that varied in production contributed to perceived accent strength. Conclusions: These findings support a cue-specific, perception-grounded account of accentedness and establish phonological feature posteriors derived from Phonet as interpretable phonological categories through which gradient L2 production differences are evaluated by listeners.
Keywords: accented speech; phonological features; phonetic gradience; cue-specific change; bilingual speech; neural networks accented speech; phonological features; phonetic gradience; cue-specific change; bilingual speech; neural networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Venkateswaran, N.; Wayland, R. Phonological Feature Posteriors and Cue-Specific Accent Perception in Hindi- and Tamil-Accented English. Brain Sci. 2026, 16, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020177

AMA Style

Venkateswaran N, Wayland R. Phonological Feature Posteriors and Cue-Specific Accent Perception in Hindi- and Tamil-Accented English. Brain Sciences. 2026; 16(2):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Venkateswaran, Nitin, and Ratree Wayland. 2026. "Phonological Feature Posteriors and Cue-Specific Accent Perception in Hindi- and Tamil-Accented English" Brain Sciences 16, no. 2: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020177

APA Style

Venkateswaran, N., & Wayland, R. (2026). Phonological Feature Posteriors and Cue-Specific Accent Perception in Hindi- and Tamil-Accented English. Brain Sciences, 16(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop