Next Article in Journal
Editorial for Brain Sciences Special Issue “Advances in Restorative Neurotherapeutic Technologies”
Previous Article in Journal
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
AI Chatbots and Cognitive Control: Enhancing Executive Functions Through Chatbot Interactions: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition

1
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
4
BruBotics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(3), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030272
Submission received: 8 February 2025 / Accepted: 10 February 2025 / Published: 4 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition)
Cognitive training has emerged as a promising approach to enhancing executive function and cognition across various populations from children to older adults [1,2,3]. Given the increasing prevalence of cognitive decline and neurodegenerative conditions, understanding the mechanisms and effectiveness of cognitive training interventions is crucial [4,5]. Over the past decades, research has demonstrated the benefits of targeted cognitive exercises, but many questions remain regarding optimal training protocols, the durability of effects, and the interaction between cognitive training and other interventions such as physical exercise [5,6].
Despite progress in this field, significant knowledge gaps persist. These include the need for a deeper understanding of individualized training responses, the role of neuroplasticity in long-term cognitive improvements, and the applicability of cognitive training in real-world settings [7,8]. Furthermore, the interaction between cognitive training and lifestyle factors, including physical activity, social engagement, and environmental influences, remains an area requiring further investigation [9,10]. Additionally, while technology-driven cognitive training programs, including virtual reality and AI-assisted tools, have gained attention, their efficacy compared to traditional cognitive training approaches is still under debate [11,12].
This Special Issue of Brain Sciences addresses several of these gaps by presenting a diverse range of studies exploring the impact of cognitive training on executive function and cognition. The papers included examine innovative intervention strategies across different populations and contexts. Contributions include the evaluation of AI chatbot interactions for enhancing executive functions, the benefits of board games in improving visuospatial memory and mathematical skills in children, and the impact of aquatic exercise on cognitive function in older adults. Additionally, this Issue explores the relationship between prior physical activity engagement and quality of life perceptions, the effectiveness of parental guidance in self-regulation interventions for children, and the cognitive effects of virtual reality exergames compared to nature exposure.
By integrating systematic reviews, controlled clinical trials, and experimental methodologies, this Special Issue provides comprehensive insights into how cognitive training interventions can be optimized for short- and long-term benefits. The findings suggest promising avenues for future research, such as the development of AI-assisted cognitive training tools, the integration of physical and cognitive training for older adults, and the role of structured play in cognitive development among children.
Looking ahead, research should focus on personalized cognitive training interventions, leveraging technology to tailor programs based on individual cognitive profiles and needs. Large-scale longitudinal studies are also needed to assess the sustainability of training effects over time. Furthermore, interdisciplinary approaches combining neuroscience, psychology, and AI could lead to groundbreaking advancements in cognitive training methodologies. Additional exploration into the synergistic effects of cognitive training combined with social and/or physical activities may offer a more holistic approach to improve health and even performance. One example of such an innovative training methodology is Brain Endurance Training (BET), which integrates both physical and cognitive components within one training session. The rationale behind BET is that it leverages the combined effects of physical and cognitive training on brain function and structure, potentially producing synergistic benefits that enhance both general brain health and cognitive and physical performance capacity in athletes, in addition to patient populations [13]. This is nicely illustrated in a study by Bogataj et al. [14], in which a cohort of patients undergoing hemodialysis underwent a novel, 12-week, non-pharmacological intradialytic intervention combining physical and cognitive training, while a second group received standard care. This intervention led to improved physical and cognitive performance, preserved levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and better scores regarding mental fatigue, frailty, and quality of life [14].
We extend our gratitude to all the contributors who have enriched this Special Issue with their pioneering research. Their efforts enhance our understanding of cognitive training and its potential applications across different populations. We also acknowledge the reviewers whose expertise ensured the high quality of the published work.
As cognitive training research continues to evolve, we anticipate that future studies will refine and expand our knowledge, ultimately leading to more effective interventions for preserving and enhancing cognitive function across the lifespan. We hope this Special Issue serves as a foundation for ongoing exploration and innovation in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Š.B. and B.R.; resources, Š.B. and B.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Š.B.; writing—review and editing, B.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University Medical Centre Ljubljana, tertiary research project number 20240208.

Acknowledgments

Bart Roelands is a Collen-Francqui research professor and a member of the Strategic Research Program Exercise and the Brain in Health & Disease: The Added Value of Human-Centered Robotics (SRP77).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scionti, N.; Cavallero, M.; Zogmaister, C.; Marzocchi, G.M. Is Cognitive Training Effective for Improving Executive Functions in Preschoolers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2020, 10, 482835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Smith, P.J.; Blumenthal, J.A.; Hoffman, B.M.; Cooper, H.; Strauman, T.A.; Welsh-Bohmer, K.; Browndyke, J.N.; Sherwood, A. Aerobic Exercise and Neurocognitive Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psychosom. Med. 2010, 72, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Diamond, A.; Ling, D.S. Review of the Evidence on, and Fundamental Questions About, Efforts to Improve Executive Functions, Including Working Memory. Cogn. Work. Mem. Train. 2020, 143–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Karbach, J.; Verhaeghen, P. Making Working Memory Work: A Meta-Analysis of Executive-Control and Working Memory Training in Older Adults. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 25, 2027–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guo, W.; Zang, M.; Klich, S.; Kawczyński, A.; Smoter, M.; Wang, B. Effect of Combined Physical and Cognitive Interventions on Executive Functions in OLDER Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lustig, C.; Shah, P.; Seidler, R.; Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. Aging, Training, and the Brain: A Review and Future Directions. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2009, 19, 504–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, L.Y.; Healy, M.P.; Fischer, N.L.; Tong, K.; Chen, A.S.; Sahakian, B.J.; Kourtzi, Z. Cognitive Flexibility Training for Impact in Real-World Settings. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2024, 59, 101413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Green, C.S.; Bavelier, D. Exercising Your Brain: A Review of Human Brain Plasticity and Training-Induced Learning. Psychol. Aging 2008, 23, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kirby, E.D.; Beyst, B.; Beyst, J.; Brodie, S.M.; D’Arcy, R.C.N. A Retrospective, Observational Study of Real-World Clinical Data from the Cognitive Function Development Therapy Program. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1508815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hertzog, C.; Kramer, A.F.; Wilson, R.S.; Lindenberger, U. Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2008, 9, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wolinsky, F.D.; Vander Weg, M.W.; Howren, M.B.; Jones, M.P.; Dotson, M.M. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Training Using a Visual Speed of Processing Intervention in Middle Aged and Older Adults. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Szczepocka, E.; Mokros, Ł.; Kazmierski, J.; Nowakowska, K.; Łucka, A.; Antoszczyk, A.; Oltra-Cucarella, J.; Werzowa, W.; Hellevik, M.M.; Skouras, S.; et al. The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality–Based Training on Cognitive, Social, and Physical Functioning in High-Functioning Older Adults (CoSoPhy FX): 2-Arm, Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2024, 13, e53261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Roelands, B.; Bogataj, Š. Optimizing Athletic Performance Through Brain Endurance Training. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2024, 19, 973–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bogataj, Š.; Roelands, B.; Pajek, M.; Pajek, J. Intradialytic Cycling and Cognitive Training to Mitigate Decreased Functional and Physiological Status in Haemodialysis Patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2024, 16, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogataj, Š.; Roelands, B. The Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030272

AMA Style

Bogataj Š, Roelands B. The Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(3):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogataj, Špela, and Bart Roelands. 2025. "The Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition" Brain Sciences 15, no. 3: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030272

APA Style

Bogataj, Š., & Roelands, B. (2025). The Effects of Cognitive Training on Executive Function and Cognition. Brain Sciences, 15(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop