Next Article in Journal
Effects of Virtual Reality on Motor Function and Balance in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Neurological Emergencies in Incarcerated Patients: Clinical Characteristics, Severity, and Outcomes in an Emergency Department with an Embedded Neuro-Emergency Expert Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Audio-Visual Entrainment Neuromodulation: A Review of Technical and Functional Aspects †

by
Masoud Rahmani
1,*,
Leonor Josefina Romero Lauro
2 and
Alberto Pisoni
2
1
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The research in this manuscript is part of Rahmani’s Ph.D. dissertation.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101070
Submission received: 14 July 2025 / Revised: 16 September 2025 / Accepted: 24 September 2025 / Published: 30 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropsychology)

Abstract

Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE) is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological neuromodulation approach that aims to align brain activity with externally delivered auditory and visual rhythms. This review surveys AVE’s historical development, technical parameters (e.g., frequency, phase, waveform, color, intensity, presentation mode), components and delivery methods, reported clinical applications, and safety considerations. Given the heterogeneity of AVE protocols and terminology, we conducted a structured narrative review (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar; earliest records to July 2025), including human and animal studies that met an operational definition of regulated AVE and consistent administration of specified auditory and visual frequencies, with critical methodological details reported. We highlight AVE’s accessibility and versatility, outline a stepwise parameter reporting framework to support standardization, and discuss putative mechanisms via sensory and oscillatory pathways. However, current findings are heterogeneous and include null or limited effects. Mechanistic understanding and parameter optimization remain insufficiently developed, and premature claims of efficacy are not warranted. Rigorous, standardized, and adequately controlled studies are needed before AVE can be considered a reliable therapeutic tool.

1. Introduction

In the last two decades, neuromodulation techniques have drastically improved psychiatric disorder symptoms, either independently or in collaboration with other therapeutic methods. These techniques have captured the attention of scientists, leading to a dramatic increase in research publications in this field. However, several neuromodulation techniques remain underexplored, requiring further investigation to uncover their full potential.
One such technique is Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE). It has been studied for various disorders, with findings suggesting its potential therapeutic abilities. Despite this promise, challenges remain in understanding its mechanisms of action and optimizing protocol design due to the technique’s numerous components. Notably, AVE can engage most brain regions while being a versatile, cost-effective, and home-based solution that does not require clinical settings or specialized personnel. These characteristics underscore the importance of further studying AVE, refining its design, and understanding its effects to aid clinicians in therapeutic applications.
AVE is a non-pharmacological, rhythmic, stimulus-driven intervention that aligns the brain’s electrical frequencies with externally presented audio and visual cues [1]. This synchronization is thought to influence various cognitive and emotional processes. Furthermore, to improve conceptual understanding, distinctions have been established between audiovisual entrainment and audiovisual stimulation (AVS) to clarify the usage contexts of these terms: AVE involves a controlled, consistent delivery of targeted frequencies, while AVS may include exposure to a range of frequencies, such as those experienced during television watching [2].
Technically, AVE is delivered through devices ranging from essential headphones and visual displays to more sophisticated systems like AVE-specific wearable glasses. These technologies highlight AVE’s flexibility, simplicity, and portability, enabling its application in both traditional clinical environments and user-driven settings at home as it is findable in the market.
Unlike more noninvasive brain stimulation (NiBS) techniques, which require extensive setup and maintenance, AVE devices are standalone units that do not require ongoing consumable costs. This economic efficiency, combined with AVE’s broad applicational potential in therapeutic settings and cognitive research, positions it as a valuable tool in clinical and experimental neuroscience.
AVE could be categorized as a neuromodulatory technique. It may act through the entrainment of the neural population to the delivered audio/visual frequency, a process utilized across various scientific disciplines. Entrainment, originally described as a biological phenomenon where an organism exhibits a frequency-resonant response to a sequence of stimuli, has also been found in neural populations in response to external stimulation [3]. AVE is characterized by its multifaceted aspects and can be implemented in numerous forms. The term “AVE” concisely encapsulates the essence of this technique; however, its representation varies across different studies. Despite these variations, the field of neuromodulation faces a significant challenge due to the absence of standardized protocols and consistent terminology for AVE.
One theoretical framework that may help explain this phenomenon is Dynamic Attending Theory (DAT), developed by Mari Riess Jones and colleagues, elucidates how people direct their attention to rhythmic patterns in the environment. The central idea is that attention itself is rhythmic and can synchronize with predictable structures in speech, music, and movement. When events are highly regular, they support future-oriented attending, allowing listeners to anticipate when important moments will occur. By contrast, less regular events encourage analytic attending, where people focus on local details such as grouping or counting. A key concept in DAT is attunement—the alignment of internal attentional rhythms with external temporal patterns, which enables accurate perception, prediction, and coordinated action [4].
AVE has also been referred to in the literature as:
  • Audiovisual Stimulation (AVS) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
  • Brainwave Entrainment (BWE) [1,13,14,15].
  • Mind Machine [16,17,18].
  • Light and Sound Machines (LSM) [19,20].
  • Light and Sound Stimulation [19,21,22].
  • Audio Photic Stimulation (APS) [9,23,24,25].
  • Brain Wave Synchronizer (BWS) [26,27].
  • Haptic and Multimodal Rhythmic Stimuli [28,29].
  • Multisensory Stimulation [30,31,32].
The significance of audio and visual stimulation has been deeply entrenched in history. The impact of visual stimulation may have started with the discovery of fire when our ancestors perceived the alteration of consciousness by staring at a flaming burning fire [19]. Knowledge about the effects of auditory stimulation and the effort to make instruments capable of producing beats has been dated to 5500–2350 BC [33].
In the Ancient Greek age, Apuleius (124–170 AD) fabricated a light stimulator with a pot. Ptolemy (100–170 AD) proclaimed that if you placed a spoke wheel by the sunlight and rotated it, the observer would see flickering lights and enter a euphoric state [34]. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Pierre Janet, a French psychologist, observed that spinning a spoke wheel reduced symptoms of depression, tension, and hysteria [35].
Auditory stimuli, particularly in the form of rhythmic pulses, play a significant role in various religious rituals, exemplified by the practices of Shamanism. This spiritual tradition, which focuses on establishing connections with the supernatural world, characteristically initiates its sacred ceremonies with drumming. The drumbeat precedes attaining a shamanic state of consciousness, a critical phase during which shamans should engage in healing, wellness, and communication with spiritual entities. The drum is perceived not merely as a musical instrument but as a transformative tool, metaphorically described as a horse that transports the shaman to other worlds [36].
In summary, compelling evidence suggests that ancient civilizations recognized the profound impact of visual and auditory stimuli on human consciousness. From the effects of gazing into a fire to the rhythmic drumming in shamanic rituals, these sensory experiences have shaped human interaction with the world. However, in contemporary society, the significance of such stimuli may need to be improved. This is attributed to the heightened threshold for sensory excitement, exacerbated by constant exposure to the intense and pervasive influences of modern multimedia devices. This evolution in sensory engagement reflects a significant shift in how humans perceive and respond to auditory and visual stimuli in the digital age.
This review aims to examine Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE), focusing on parameters, clinical applications, underlying mechanisms, and safety considerations. By identifying gaps in current knowledge and discussing potential future directions, it seeks to advance understanding and guide the standardization of AVE protocols for therapeutic and research purposes. Due to the diversity of AVE protocols, inconsistent terminology, and variability in delivery, a formal systematic review was not feasible. Instead, a structured narrative approach was employed. Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar searches, supplemented by manual reference checks. Search terms included audiovisual entrainment, audiovisual stimulation, and related terminology. Studies were included if they met our operational definition of AVE—regulated, consistent administration of specified auditory and visual frequencies, as outlined in the introduction and with critical methodological details reported. Both human and animal studies were considered, covering literature from the earliest available entries to July 2025.

2. AVE Parameters

The categorization of Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE) as a technique of the noninvasive brain stimulation (NiBS) techniques remains unclear. Nevertheless, AVE exhibits several standard parameters comparable to conventional NiBS methods, indicating potential parallels in their neuromodulatory impacts.
Various neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), employ multiple parameters influencing their functional mechanisms. In tDCS, aspects such as stimulation duration, the electric current’s polarity, electrode size, and current intensity are critical. This setting dramatically determines whether the stimulation produces inhibitory or excitatory effects on neural circuits [37]. Notwithstanding initial research, the comprehensive effects of various AVE configurations on brain responses and clinical outcomes remain ambiguous. Preliminary findings, like those by Rosenfeld [38] illustrate possible applications of specific AVE configurations while underscoring the necessity for additional research. Further comprehensive research is necessary to assess AVE’s therapeutic potential and to refine its parameters for certain clinical requirements, while the main components and parameters remain undefined and the approach is still far from a standardized technique.
Similarly, the effectiveness of AVE in influencing neural activity is contingent upon several specific parameters. These parameters include the visual pulse’s color and shape, the stimuli’s frequency and phase, and the auditory pulse’s pitch. Research exploring the modulation of psychiatric disorders by these parameters has shown that various settings can alter cortical activity effects to achieve precise therapeutic results [39,40,41].
Considering these similarities to conventional NiBS, it becomes essential to investigate if distinct attributes of AVE can independently affect brain activity. In the subsequent sections, the existing research on these elements will be examined, to assess their possible role in neuromodulation.

2.1. Intensity

The first essential element of the AVE that requires modification prior to initiation is the intensity of the light and the sound volume, personalized for each participant. Customization is crucial because of the large variations in retinal sensitivity, pupil size and the anatomy of eyelashes and eyelids among individuals, particularly those linked to ethnic origins [42]. Moreover, auditory sensitivity is distinctly individual [43], necessitating precise modulation of sound loudness to ensure an optimal and comfortable experience for every participant. The above factors are crucial, as failure to adapt them may result in diminished effectiveness, discomfort for the participant, and feelings of fatigue and aversion.

2.2. Color

Audiovisual Entrainment devices in the market typically incorporate lights of varying colors, as illustrated in Figure 1. A substantial body of research supports that color influences individual mood and behavior and elicits distinctly varied effects based on the specific hue [42,43,44]. For instance, studies have documented how different colors can induce different psychological responses, ranging from calming effects with blue to stimulating effects with red [45,46,47]. Moreover, the interaction between color and brain function extends beyond subjective psychological effects to quantifiable changes in brain activity. Münch [48] has shown that various colors can distinctly influence brain wave patterns. This evidence implies that the selection of colors in AVE devices could be deliberately tailored to engage specific neural rhythms linked with desired psychological states. These studies have important implications for the design and application of AVE devices. By understanding the nuanced effects of color on both psychological and neurophysiological levels, manufacturers can enhance the efficacy of AVE technologies. This suggests that, since different colors exert distinct psychological and neurophysiological effects, the choice of color in AVE studies should be made purposefully in line with the specific aims of the experiment. While we have highlighted some general differences in psychological responses (e.g., calming versus stimulating effects), researchers are encouraged to consult the existing literature in detail prior to study design to ensure that color selection is aligned with the intended outcomes.

2.3. Frequency

The frequency parameter is pivotal in noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, dramatically impacting neural outcomes. In the context of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), it has been documented that stimulation at a frequency of 1 Hz reduces cortical excitability, as demonstrated by Gerschlager [47]. Conversely, higher frequencies have an excitatory effect on cortical areas [48]. Similar variability in response based on frequency settings is observed in AVE. Research indicates that AVE stimulation within the theta frequency band (5 Hz) can enhance memory functions [49]. In contrast, stimulation in the beta frequency range appears to yield no significant improvements in cognitive performance [50]. This differential impact underscores the critical role of precise frequency selection in aligning with specific neurophysiological targets. Frequency settings directly influence the synchronization of brain networks by modulating brain oscillations and facilitating activity coordination across various neural nodes [51]. Therefore, the choice of frequency in AVE studies should be carefully considered and defined, drawing from an extensive review of the existing literature and the targeted therapeutic or cognitive outcomes. Such a strategic approach ensures that the selected frequencies are optimally aligned with the intended goals of the brain stimulation protocol.

2.4. Phase

The visual processing system is unique in its contralateral organization. More specifically, stimuli from the right visual field are exclusively processed by the left hemisphere of the brain, while stimuli in the left visual field enter the right hemisphere [52]. Such an anatomical arrangement allows for selective, independent stimulation of each hemisphere. That is particularly valuable within neuromodulation techniques when one’s goal is to target some areas or functions of the brain. In the context of AVE, this neural architecture is exploited by stimulating the left visual field (LVF) and right visual field (RVF) with a phase offset, as illustrated in Figure 2. This method of stimulation results in differential brain responses, depending on the targeted hemisphere. Such hemisphere-specific stimulation can be particularly insightful for studies on understanding lateralized brain functions and their impact on cognitive and behavioral processes. Bunch of studies [53,54,55], supports the effectiveness of this approach, indicating that. Targeted visual field stimulation can elicit distinct patterns of brain activity, offering a nuanced tool for investigating and manipulating brain dynamics. This represents another important aspect of AVE, as it allows researchers to target more specific regions of the brain. However, such methodological details should always be explicitly reported in studies to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

2.5. The Shape of the Visual Pulse

Flicker refers to the rapid oscillation of light intensity, akin to the repetitive switching of a light source between on and off states. The duration of each flicker and the temporal dynamics required to achieve the lowest and highest intensity peaks can vary considerably. These variations generate diverse waveform patterns, which can differ in frequency, amplitude, and shape. These patterns influence the perceptual and physiological responses elicited by the flicker. This variation is attributed to how different waveforms interact with the neural dynamics of the brain. According to empirical finding [56] it has been demonstrated that sinusoidal waveforms (Figure 2), for instance, offer a smooth, continuous oscillation that might be less disruptive and more naturally integrated into the brain’s rhythms in contrast, square waveforms create a more abrupt, discrete transition between light and dark, which can induce a stronger neural response, particularly by enhancing cortical excitability and generating a more pronounced steady-state visual evoked potential. Triangular waveforms balance these two, with a linear but sharper change in light intensity compared to sinusoidal waves. It has been shown that the signal’s shape noticeably varies the entrainment’s effects by up to 50%. Beyond the primary effects of the waveform shape on entrainment, secondary parameters, often referred to as harmonic effects, also play a significant role. These effects are intricately linked to the fundamental waveform and arise from the overtones that each shape naturally produces. Harmonic effects can influence the complexity and the reach of entrainment across different brain regions, affecting both the efficacy and the stimulation experience [56]. Understanding the implications of these waveform characteristics is essential for optimizing flicker-based therapies and research protocols. It allows for designing more effective and tailored interventions to target specific neurological conditions or research objectives. For instance, choosing the appropriate waveform could enhance therapeutic outcomes and grant the safety in treatments for conditions like epilepsy, where precise control over neural rhythm modulation is crucial.

2.6. The Pitch of the Auditory Stimulus

Musical tones are primarily distinguished by pitch. This notion of pitch is essential for grasping auditory perception and has been the focus of scientific research for many years. Early research by Chatrian [57] explored how auditory clicks presented to one ear can differ significantly in perception and brain response, setting the stage for subsequent investigations into auditory processing. One seminal advancement in this field was introduced by oster [58] who investigated the phenomenon of auditory beat stimulation. This study showed that presenting two sinusoidal auditory waves at slightly different pitches to each ear led to distinct brain responses. This effect is known as binaural beats (BB), where each ear receives a different frequency, such as one ear receiving a tone at 200 Hz and the other at 210 Hz. The brain internally creates a perceptual third tone equal to the difference between the two frequencies. This internally generated beat is hypothesized to entrain brain activity, potentially increasing the amplitude of brain waves at the frequency of this beat. Subsequent research has explored how these auditory stimuli influence cognitive functions and are reflected in changes observed through electroencephalography (EEG). Engelbregt [59] examined both monaural beat (MB) and BB in 40 Hz. Findings showed that binaural beats improved attention while monaural beats impaired it. Despite these cognitive differences, EEG recordings showed no significant changes in gamma-band activity across conditions. Future research will likely continue to unravel these complex interactions, offering new avenues for theoretical insights and practical applications in neuropsychology and beyond. This component is another one which to what extant has been proven that able to change the effects and similar to the other parameters should be considered.

2.7. The Presentation Parameters

The characteristics cited in the literature, including intensity, color, frequency, and phase, may affect the efficacy of AVE and potentially impact the results. Nevertheless, careful consideration must be afforded to the method in which the stimulation is delivered. One significant variable in the AVE application is the choice between eyes-open (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) conditions. Research indicates that these conditions activate distinctly different neural networks. A research by Han [60] illustrates these differences, showing that brain network connectivity significantly shifts between EO and EC conditions. With EO, AVE tends to increase connectivity in networks related to external sensory processing and attentional engagement. At the same time, EC conditions reduce external sensory integration, leading to enhanced connectivity in networks related to introspection and self-referential thought. These findings suggest that AVE can be tailored more effectively by adjusting visual engagement (EO or EC), depending on whether the goal is to stimulate outward-focused attention or inward-focused relaxation. Typically, AVE studies have utilized a conventional mode whereby visual stimuli are presented simultaneously to both eyes Figure 3A. This approach ensures uniform stimulus delivery across the visual fields, providing a baseline for observing generalized brain responses to visual entrainment.
In more specialized setups, stimuli can be directed separately to the right visual field (RVF) and left visual field (LVF), potentially even in different phases, as outlined in the phase section [61]. Another option is presenting two different frequencies which causes different dynamic phase. This method allows for the targeted stimulation of each brain hemisphere, as each visual field is primarily processed by the opposite cerebral hemisphere Figure 3B,C. This arrangement can investigate lateralized brain functions or address hemispheric imbalances in clinical scenarios. Further variations include delivering flickering light to only one eye or adjusting the frequencies for LVF/RVF stimulation. These nuanced approaches enable researchers to explore the specific effects of unilateral versus bilateral visual input on neural activity and cognitive functions.
In addition to visual stimuli, as mentioned auditory pulses in BB deliver auditory pulses at slightly different frequencies to each ear, producing a perceived beat frequency that arises from the differential in input. Conversely, monaural beats present a beat frequency directly. These auditory stimuli can be set at a fixed frequency, such as 10 Hz (as for transcranial alternative current stimulation (tACS)), or within a programmed range, like 13 to 18 Hz, mimicking parameters used in transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS).
Alternatively, auditory stimuli can be administered randomly as introduced with white noise [62], which covers a broader frequency range. Depending on the frequency and randomness of the stimulation, such variability can induce different forms of brain plasticity or cognitive effects, potentially ramping up or down through different wavebands to elicit specific neural responses.
Each approach—visual or auditory, fixed or variable in frequency, eyes-open or eyes-closed—provides a unique toolset for manipulating neural activity through AVE. This versatility enhances the scope of research into brain function and Neurotherapy. It expands the potential clinical applications of AVE in treating neurological disorders, enhancing cognitive performance, or providing relaxation and stress relief. By tailoring the stimulation parameters, researchers and clinicians can optimize AVE methods to suit specific therapeutic goals or experimental needs, thereby advancing our understanding of the complex interactions between sensory stimuli and brain activity.

2.7.1. Standardization Rationale and Step-Wise Reporting of Parameters

Up to now, the components and the presentation modes have been explained. In this section, instead, a step by step selection and consideration of the parameters is presented Table 1. Nevertheless, the current literature offers insufficient direct inquiry into each AVE parameter to determine the conditions under which it is most effective or appropriate Table 2. Disentangling these parameters and documenting the selection methods while justifying choices in light of contemporary knowledge would represent meaningful progress toward a standardized AVE protocol. This document provides a step-by-step guide for choosing and reporting the status and conditions of AVE components.
Step 1—Visual Stimuli
A critical aspect is the report of whether stimulation is delivered with eyes open or closed, and the specification of the spatial presentation within the visual fields. Flicker may be confined to one eye [63] or a single visual field, or may encompass both eyes and all four visual fields [61]. Specifying the stimulation frequency (or frequencies), including whether different frequencies are applied to different visual fields is crucial. As illustrated in Figure 2, flicker can be presented with controlled phase relationships; this is one method to differentially engage the cerebral hemispheres. The chosen frequency (or frequencies) may be static or variable over time [5]. For example, within the theta band (4–8 Hz), the stimulus may step from 4 Hz to 5, 6, 7, and 8 Hz in two-second epochs before returning to 4 Hz, or it may sample frequencies randomly from a predefined set. Color is an additional parameter that can modulate the effect and should be reported. Finally, the signal form (e.g., sinusoidal, square) is a critical element with meaningful consequences and must be specified [44,45,46].
Step 2—Auditory Presentation
Also auditory stimuli can be delivered to one ear or both. If bilateral, it must be specified whether tones/pulses are simultaneous or alternating between ears. It must also be indicated whether auditory beats are used (monaural or binaural) and report the pitch (carrier frequency) of the tones if applicable. Frequency is a key factor and should be documented with the same level of detail as for visual flicker (single vs. multi-frequency; static, stepped, swept, or randomized over time).
Step 3—Intensity Calibration (Link to Section 2.1)
A potential measure for standardization may involve evaluating each individual sensory threshold prior to presenting the AVE. Thresholds for both auditory and visual stimuli can be established by pinpointing the minimum level at which the stimulus is undetectable and the maximum level at which it is perceived as intrusive. The ideal configuration can subsequently be selected as the midpoint between these two values. The identical approach must be reiterated for the visual stimuli.
Step 4—Temporal Structure and Dose
The report have to include the total session duration, number of sessions, and weekly schedule. Indicate ramp-in/ramp-out periods to reduce startle and fatigue.
Step 5—Synchronization Across Modalities
The protocol must indicate whether auditory and visual streams are delivered at the same frequency, harmonically related, or intentionally offset; report any phase lead/lag (ms or degrees).
Step 6—Safety Checks and Exclusions
A pre-session screening (photosensitivity, migraine history, hearing issues), stop criteria, and any adverse events have to be included to control for potential adverse events or discomfort (see next section).
Table 2. This table presents AVE studies methodologically closest to the protocol proposed in this review. In all included studies, auditory and visual stimulation were delivered with defined timing and frequencies. Unreported parameters are indicated as not mentioned.
Table 2. This table presents AVE studies methodologically closest to the protocol proposed in this review. In all included studies, auditory and visual stimulation were delivered with defined timing and frequencies. Unreported parameters are indicated as not mentioned.
Study (Author Year)Eyes ConditionFrequency (Hz)Auditory Pulses (Pitch)AVE Device TypePhase (L/R Visual Fields)Intensity (Audio/Visual)Session DurationExperiment DurationFlicker Color
Adrian & Matthews (1934) [64]Closed10 HzNot mentionedPhotic stimulation goggles (early device)Reported (details unclear)Not mentioned40 sNot mentionedNot mentioned
Brauchli et al. (1995) [5]Closed10 HzNot mentionedPhotic stimulation goggles (early device)Reported (details unclear)Not mentioned40 sNot mentionedNot mentioned
Hsiung & Hsieh (2024) [6]Closed40 HzNot mentionedLED light bulb and computer screenNot mentionedNot mentioned3 min per group10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.Not mentioned
Mansouri et al. (2022) [7]Not specifiedNot mentionedNot mentionedRepetitive light and sound exposure (cartoon sound, colored lights)Not specifiedNot specified6 h/dayBehavioral testsNot specified
Oppermann et al. (2023) [8]Not specified[7.8, 8.8, 12.8, 13.4, 14.4, 18, 19, 23] HzNot mentionedConsumer-grade auditory-visual stimulation deviceNot specifiedNot specified16 sessions over four weeksTwo lab sessions, rest at homeNot specified
Tang et al. (2014) [9]ClosedAlpha to Delta (8 Hz to 1 Hz)Not mentionedProcyon AVS device (light goggles and headphones)Not specifiedNot specified30 min nightly for 1 monthOne-month interventionNot specified
Làdavas, Tosatto, & Bertini (2022) [31]OpenedNot mentionedNot mentionedAudio-visual stimulation with LEDs and loudspeakersNot specifiedNot specified10 sessions (4 h/day)2 weeks (Follow-up at 6.5 months)Not specified
Locke et al. (2020) [15]Opened1 Hz to 23 HzBinaural beats, visual stimulationSmartphone app with VR headset and headphonesNot specifiedNot specified10 min per day (up to 40 min max)4 weeks at homeNot specified
Teplan et al. (2009) [11]Closed4 Hz, 17 HzNot mentionedLED glasses and headphonesNot specifiedNot specified20 min (each stimulation interval)Repeated exposureNot specified
Timmermann et al. (1999) [12]closedDominant alpha and twice dominant alpha185 Hz sine wavePolysync Pro Synetic Systems (headphones and photic glasses)Not specifiedNot specified20 min per condition2 sessions, each separated by 2 weeksRed light (LEDs)
Roberts et al. (2018) [50]Not specified5.5 HzNot mentionedAudio-visual entrainment (headphones and goggles)Not specifiedNot specified36 min (entrainment session)2 experiments with different entrainment conditionsNot specified
Cantor & Stevens (2009) [65]Not specified14 HzNot mentionedMind Gear PR-2x auditory-visual stimulation system (LED glasses and binaural beats)Not specifiedNot specified30 min daily for 4 weeks8 weeks total, including 4 weeks crossoverGreen LEDs
Pino et al. (2022) [66]Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNeuro-Upper audio-visual entrainment systemNot specifiedNot specified30 min per session55 sessionsNot specified
Berg & Siever (2009) [67]Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)1 Hz, 20 HzNot mentionedDAVID Paradise AVE device (light and tone pulsing)Not specified60–70 dB (adjustable)20 min (each session)4 weeks (2 weeks placebo, 2 weeks active)Not specified
Klimesch (1999) [68]Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedEEG oscillations analysis (alpha and theta)Not specifiedNot specified5 min per block8 sessions, post-test sessionNot specified
Hanslmayr et al. (2005) [69]Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNeurofeedback for upper alpha enhancementNot specifiedNot specified5 min per session4 weeksNot specified
Pino & Romano (2022) [66]OpenedNot specifiedNot specifiedNeuro-Upper audio-visual entrainment systemNot specifiedNot specified30 min per session55 sessionsNot specified
Pearson & Wilbiks (2021) [70]Not specified2 Hz to 32 HzNot specifiedSelf-generated audiovisual memory cuesNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified6 monthsNot specified
Seger et al. (2023) [71]Not specified5.5 HzNot mentionedVirtual navigation + mental simulationNot specifiedNot specified28–33 sessions, 22-min sessions7 weeksNot specified
Roberts et al. (2018) [50]Not specified7–9 Hz and 12–22 HzNot mentionedDAVID PAL 36 by Mind Alive Inc. (headphones and visual stimulation)Independent left and right visual stimulationNot specified20–30 min sessions4 weeksNot specified
Joyce & Siever (2000) [72]Closed10 Hz, 18 HzNot mentionedDAVID Paradise XL (field independent eyeglasses)Left-right field independentNot specified3-min sessions per condition3 monthsWhite light with light blue tint
Siever (2003) [73]Closed40 HzBinaural beatsDAVID Paradise XL, Light-sound stimulation deviceNot specifiedNot specified30 min nightly for 4 weeks1-week baseline, 4-week interventionWhite light with light blue tint
Halpin et al. (2023) [74]OpenedDelta, 2 HzNot specifiedSmartphone app (hBET) using light and sound stimulationLeft-right visual stimulationNot specified30 minutes per session6 monthsNot specified
Chan et al. (2022) [75]OpenedNot specifiedBinaural beatsProcyon AVS device (light goggles and headphones)Not specified92% adherence, under user control30 min nightly for 1 month2 monthsWhite flicker
Tang (2021) [76]ClosedNot specifiedNot specifiedPolysync Pro Synetic Systems (headphones and photic glasses)Not specifiedNot specified20 min per condition1 monthWhite flicker
Tang (2015) [77]ClosedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified2 weeksWhite flicker

3. Safety

There is a notable scarcity of comprehensive research examining the safety of audiovisual entrainment. To date, specific adverse effects have not been documented. Nevertheless, two conditions warrant consideration. Photosensitive epilepsy emerges as a primary concern within this context. Epidemiological data suggest that approximately 5% of individuals with epilepsy are susceptible to photic-induced seizures, with higher incidence rates observed among younger demographics and women [78]. Consequently, this subgroup should be categorically excluded from AVE interventions to prevent the risk of seizures. In one of the studies in phase one the safety and feasibility of 40 Hz has been examined, including 2 patients with epilepsy. During a brief session no abnormal brain activity or discomfort has been reported by 40 Hz stimulation [31]. However, further investigation is necessary regarding epilepsy, as another recent study has not only refrained from excluding it but has also successfully introduced audiovisual entrainment as a potential treatment for the condition [30].
Another condition that warrants consideration is migraine, particularly photic- or visually triggered migraine. Repetitive light stimulation has been reported as a potential trigger for migraine attacks in susceptible individuals [79,80]. While AVE protocols have not systematically documented migraine induction, the possibility of exacerbating symptoms should be acknowledged, and individuals with a history of visually induced migraine should be carefully monitored or excluded from such interventions.
Moreover, the implications of excessive AVE use have been studied in animal models, revealing significant neurobiological consequences. Research conducted by Mansouri [7] indicates that overexposure to AVE in rats increases neuronal density in the amygdala, which correlates with a marked decrease in social behavior. These findings underscore the need for regulated use and highlight AVE’s potential to alter brain function adversely.
Considering these facts, it is imperative that future research rigorously explores the safety profile of AVE. This will not only delineate the boundaries of safe use but also ensure that AVE’s therapeutic applications are both practical and safe for all user groups, especially those at risk of adverse effects.

4. Area of Application

4.1. Depression

Depression is a global mental disorder with a prevalence of an estimated 5% of adults [81]. This condition extensively disrupts daily functioning, manifesting through various symptoms, including cognitive impairment, attention deficits, verbal and nonverbal learning, short-term and working memory, auditory and visual processing, problem-solving, processing speed, and motor skills [82]. According to a conducted study, the societal cost of depressive disorders in Europe was estimated at approximately EUR 6145 million [83], with an average price per patient per year of EUR 3402 [83,84]. Based on 65 solid studies from 79 countries, the average treatment rate for this disease is 38.8% within 12 months, with significant differences between high-income countries (31.5%) and low-income countries [85].
To evaluate the efficacy of audiovisual entrainment (AVE), 16 participants underwent 20 sessions, each lasting 30 min per day (5 days per week) for four weeks. In treating depression, participants were subjected to 14 Hz stimulation, while the control group received relaxation music without any visual stimulation for five weeks. Significant outcomes include a reduction in depressive symptoms, positioning AVE as a promising non-pharmacological intervention [65].
In another study with a closed-loop design, 15 participants underwent 52 sessions, each session 30 min. Based on the real-time EEG (real-time feedback) from the participants, the audiovisual stimuli presented in alpha (7.5–11.75 Hz) to induce relaxation and Beta (12–31 Hz) for cognitive enhancement and mood regulation. Significant reduction in depressive symptoms, with participants showing improvements in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores after the intervention was reported [86]. Another study on depression indicated notable changes in depression measured by HAM-D. The study recruited 15 participants with anxiety and depressive symptoms and divided them into 8 for the experiment and 7 in the control group. Within 52 sessions (5 sessions per week), for 45 min online EEG feedback base [87].

4.2. Seasonal Affective Disorder

Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a type of depression that occurs after shifting to the primary winter months [88]. The prevalence is 6%, and according to the geographical location, the prevalence varies. This disorder is more seen in winter months [89].
An investigation divided 74 affected participants into 16 in the control group and 58 who received two weeks of 20 Hz entrainment. The AVE group showed significantly reduced depression and anxiety symptoms. It also improved social interactions within family and work environments, enhancing happiness and energy levels. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in eating and appetite [67].

4.3. Insomnia

Insomnia, affecting up to 10% of the adult population in Europe, presents significant public health concerns [90]. Studies have demonstrated notable differences in the high-frequency EEG spectral power density of sleep among those with and without insomnia, suggesting neurophysiological disparities as potential underlying causes [91,92]. A recent study analyzing the EEG power spectrum of 1985 participants reproved this statement again [93]. Different symptoms have been reported based on the period of the insomnia. Furthermore, all-cause mortality rates are heightened in men with chronic sleep disturbances [94].
Regarding therapeutic interventions, the use of an Audiovisual Stimulation (AVS) device over four weeks has been shown to yield significant improvements in insomnia symptoms and associated pain. The device operates through 30 min sessions of light flickering (goggles) and sound pulsing (headphones), which gradually transition from alpha (8 Hz) to delta (1 Hz) frequencies, effectively entraining brainwaves towards a state of deep relaxation and sleep [9]. A specific application of this technology in older adults over one month resulted in a significant decrease in insomnia severity, shifting from clinically moderate to sub-threshold (mild) insomnia [77]. These findings highlight the potential of AVS as a non-pharmacological treatment option for insomnia, offering substantial benefits across different age groups.

4.4. Cognitive Functions

Thinking, reasoning, language, memory, problem-solving, decision-making, and attention constitute core aspects of human cognitive domains [95]. Impairments in these functions are called cognitive deficits, which can stem from various causes. While such deficits are not classified as a disorder, they may indicate an underlying condition.
Throughout various tasks or cognitive states, the brain modifies the ratio of the frequency bands. For example, during cognitive tasks such as problem-solving and concentration, the predominant wave observed is beta waves (13–30 Hz) [96]. Alpha waves (8–12 Hz) are prevalent during relaxed states and light meditation [68]. The theta band (4–8 Hz) predominates during more profound relaxation or light sleep and is associated with creativity, intuition, and daydreaming [69]. However, the brain state and the activated regions are more complex. These studies provided insights for the creation of AVE procedures.
Several studies have explored the effectiveness of AVE in addressing these cognitive impairments. Aiming to improve cognitive function, the research included 15 participants who completed 52 consecutive sessions, each lasting 30 min, conducted daily from Monday to Friday. The research presented AVE in frequencies: Delta (0.5–2.75 Hz), Theta (3.5–6.75 Hz), Alpha 1 (7.5–9.25 Hz), Alpha 2 (10–11.75 Hz), Beta 1 (13–16.75 Hz), Beta 2 (18–29.75 Hz), Gamma 1 (31–39.75 Hz), and Gamma 2 (41–49.75 Hz). A control group of 8 participants was assigned to a waitlist and engaged solely in self-help groups. Results indicated a considerable enhancement in cognitive function measured by the Performance Intelligence Quotient (QIP) [86]. Another study with an RCT design and 15 participants, 7 for the treatment and 8 for the control group of depressed participants, measured the cognitive function by Cognitive functions by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM). After 52 sessions of giving AVE based on EEG online feedback in the frequency range of 0.5–49.75 Hz, the participants experienced significant improvements in cognitive functions. AVE is supposed to be a neurofeedback device compiled with EEG to monitor the brain state. A study examined the impact of audiovisual entrainment as neurofeedback on cognitive functioning in 18 psychiatric disorders. Participants completed 55 neurofeedback sessions and audiovisual entrainment treatments, recording brainwave activity. Results showed significant improvement in IQ scores for 16 out of 18 participants [66].

4.4.1. Memory

Memory is a pivotal mental process that encompasses the encoding, storage, and retrieval of information and plays a crucial role in learning and personal identity formation.
Research employing AVE to enhance memory functions has yielded promising results. Notably, theta band power (4–8 Hz) increases during memory-related activities [70,71,97,98]. It has been theorized that inducing theta band activity could improve memory abilities. Empirical studies with AVE have confirmed that theta induction (5.5 Hz) significantly improves memory, whereas inducing beta waves (14 Hz) does not yield significant differences [49,50]. Additionally, stimulation in 3 min of 40 Hz has been examined, and equal to the beta stimulation, no significant change has been reported [6].

4.4.2. Attention

Attention constitutes a critical aspect of cognitive functioning, encompassing the deliberate allocation of mental resources to specific objects, concepts, tasks, and particular elements within the environment. This cognitive process is essential for human consciousness and perception, facilitating information processing, decision-making, and communication while optimizing finite mental resources. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) represents a prevalent neuropsychiatric condition, with an incidence of 7.5% among children and adolescents (10% in boys and 5% in girls) [99] and 3.10% in adults [100]. The annual economic burden of ADHD in Europe is approximately 12,171€. This condition is associated with various comorbidities and adverse outcomes [101]. Electroencephalogram (EEG) biomarkers for ADHD have revealed notably higher average delta (0–4 Hz) and theta (4–8 Hz) bands and lower beta (13–20 Hz) (Theta/Beta ratio) in the frontal regions [102,103].
In an early investigation, thirty-four elementary school students had AVE treatment for seven weeks, each lasting around twenty minutes. The subjects underwent two distinct protocols. The initial eight sessions at low-alpha (7–9 Hz) given across 20 min are designed to facilitate relaxation. The remaining sessions for SMR (sensory motor rhythm) (12–15 Hz) and beta (15–19 Hz) will last 22 min each, and significant improvements in inattention and impulsivity will be reported [72]. In a subsequent study, school students participated in 30 sessions of AVE, lasting 20–30 min each, two or three times per week. The equal protocols employed initially ranged from 7 to 9 Hz to induce relaxation, followed by 13–18 Hz to increase brain arousal, resulting in marked improvements [104].
Unilateral spatial neglect is a disease that leads to significant complications. It involves the brain’s failure to acknowledge or respond to stimuli on one (usually the left) side of the environment [105]. AVE has been used as a therapeutic approach for this condition. Following ten daily training sessions, totaling four hours each over two weeks, results demonstrated improved visual exploration and a reduction in symptoms of neglect [31].

4.4.3. Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a degenerative condition that compromises behavioral function and interferes with daily activities [106]. Among the 0.7% of adults who have dementia, 60 to 80% progress to Alzheimer’s disease, while the disorder is becoming prevalent worldwide [107]. This disorder not only hinders the individual from leading an everyday life but also manifests symptoms such as agitation, anxiety, and melancholy, imposing significant emotional and financial burdens on families due to caregiving, which leads to stress, burnout, and inadequate support [108]. The yearly personal expense of dementia was substantial, averaging $23,796 per individual in 2019. The increased cost places considerable pressure on families, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where a large share of care is unpaid and informal [109]. Amyloid beta has been identified as a primary marker of Alzheimer’s disease in these illnesses [110]. The detected biomarkers of Alzheimer’s in EEG findings included increasing amplitude of Delta and Theta (1–8 Hz) band and decreasing in Alpha (8–12 Hz) and Beta (8–30 Hz), mainly in occipital and parietooccipital areas [111].
The studies in the mice model have shown promising results, and in the first studies, stimulation involved only 40 Hz light flicker (Without Auditory stimulation), causing a reduction in tau hyperphosphorylation, a significant decrease in Amyloid-β plaques in the hippocampus, and improvements in the circadian rhythm disturbances in AD mice [112,113,114]. A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial recruited 15 persons with moderate probable Alzheimer’s dementia to determine if similar effects would be observed in individuals. The results were inconclusive after three months of daily one-hour 40 Hz multi-sensory stimulation sessions. The initial effect of 40 Hz stimulation was shown in atrophy. Compared to the control group exposed to continual light and white noise, no substantial ventricular dilatation or hippocampus atrophy was observed, whereas the control group exhibited notable changes. The second finding indicated increased functional connectivity within the default mode network (DMN), whereas the control group demonstrated decreased connectivity. There has been a considerable improvement in cognitive function on the face-name association delayed recall test comparing the two groups. The final effect of AVE was on the regularity of disruptions in everyday activity patterns, which serves as a marker for Alzheimer’s disease. Substantial enhancement, as indicated by the Inter-daily Stability (IS) indicator, was observed during three months [75].
Pain
Chronic pain, a persistent and severe health issue, originates from various sources and affects approximately 27.5% of the global population [115]. This condition significantly impacts multiple aspects of daily life. AVE has been employed to alleviate pain and its associated effects. Initial research in this field indicated significant reductions in medication use, suicidal thoughts, and stress, alongside increases in hope, self-esteem, and improvements in family dynamics [116].
The pilot research involved nine participants independently engaged in a 30 min AVS program each night at bedtime for one month. The results indicated that AVS may serve as a valuable intervention for enhancing and alleviating pain symptoms in persons with chronic pain [9]. A more recent investigation recruited 28 participants. The result demonstrated a significant reduction in pain after administering 10 Hz AVE before sleep for 30 min over four weeks [74].
Fibromyalgia is a disorder with a prevalence of 3.3% in the population. It is a multivariate in the symptoms. The leading indicators are musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, cognitive difficulties, and sleep disorders; their severity increases with aging. This disorder is more prevalent among women than men [117]. A study evaluated the efficacy of three interventions for Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Forty-nine people with this disorder were randomized to the AVE, medicine, and nutrition groups. AVE was administered daily, three times for 30 min each, in the morning with Beta (12–30 Hz), in the afternoon with Alpha (8–12 Hz), and in the evening with Delta (0.5–4 Hz) and Theta (4–8 Hz) frequencies for one month. The AVE group exhibited substantial enhancement in all assessed variables (anxiety, pain, fatigue), but the medication group demonstrated more significant improvement [118].

5. Mechanism of Action

Based on these clinical findings, it would be valuable to further investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effects of AVE. A deeper understanding could be achieved by clarifying the pathways involved in both the auditory and visual systems. Unlike other techniques AVE comprehensively covers most of the brain regions and among the neuromodulatory techniques seems to engage most regions of the brain. To grasp the effects of AVE, it is essential to understand the sensory pathways it engages in. Visual stimuli travel from the retina through the optic nerve to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and the primary visual cortex (V1), where initial processing occurs. Further analysis happens in specialized areas such as V2, V3, and the middle temporal region, which handle complex tasks like motion and object recognition. Similarly, auditory stimuli enter the cochlea, converting sound waves into electrical signals transmitted via the auditory nerve to the auditory cortex [119]. The reason for AVE’s widespread effects is its ability to engage most brain regions and synchronize them naturally with the stimuli. This unique ability highlights AVE as an excellent and natural form of brain modulation that sets it apart from other techniques like NiBS, which are electrical-based, less comprehensive, and less intrinsic in their approach.

EEG

The seminal discovery of audiovisual entrainment (AVE) occurred after electroencephalography (EEG) became available in the late 1920s. Initial research, notably by Adrian and Mattews [64], demonstrated that brain rhythms could be modified through exposure to flickering lights at various frequencies. This foundational study is credited with pioneering the investigation of flickering light’s effects on neural activity, catalyzing further research. Subsequent studies have rigorously examined the efficacy of this technique across different disorders.
The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a technique to monitor brain activity that stands out due to its cost-effectiveness and ability to record signals with high temporal resolution. This attribute makes it particularly useful for observing the effects of audiovisual entrainment (AVE). A pioneering study employing EEG in this domain utilized three protocols at 1 Hz and 12 Hz frequencies and a dynamic decrement from 12 to 1 Hz over 7.5 min [5]. This resulted in the documentation of two extracted features. The alpha band power (8–12 Hz) considerably decreased across every intervention, while variations in the other bands were seen but not deemed significant. Dipole sources were computed, revealing variations across different bands. In the theta band (4–7.5 Hz) across all procedures, the dipole source shifted posteriorly and superiorly during stimulation. A leftward shift during protocol stimulation and a rightward and superior shift have been recorded, with more activity in the right hemisphere during beta band (12.5–20.5 Hz) stimulation [5]. Variability in EEG responses to AVE has been noted, especially among individuals with different baseline alpha powers. This was observed after presenting 7.5 min of AVE in low, high, and combined intensities and variations. Alpha stimulation (10 Hz) and beta stimulation (22 Hz) enhance alpha power at both Cz and Pz but with varying effects in participants with high baseline alpha power. High baseline alpha power was associated with lower alpha entrainment and varied responses to stimulation. Beta stimulation’s effects were influenced by both baseline alpha and beta power levels, with higher baseline beta and alpha power contributing to the observed effects. The presentation of stimuli at this frequency enhanced the power of other oscillatory bands (delta 1, 0.75–2 Hz; delta 2, 2–4 Hz; theta, 4–8 Hz; alpha, 8–12 Hz; beta 1, 12–21 Hz; and beta 2, 21–31 Hz), with effects persisting in the Beta 1 band up to 30 min post-stimulation [12].
EEG synchrony under audiovisual stimulation (AVS) by 4 and 20 Hz was investigated using Wavelet transform-derived instantaneous phases. Phase synchronization, measured by phase difference uniformity, increased significantly during AVS compared to non-stimulation across all cortex locations. The minor increases were in the frontal areas, while the central region maintained high synchronization levels similar to visual processing centers in the posterior cortex [11].
In another study, fourteen volunteers formed a study group that underwent 16 sessions of combined auditory-visual stimulation delivered via mobile phone over four weeks. The primary objective of these sessions was to enhance alpha peak activity. However, upon conducting a power analysis, the results did not indicate any significant changes in alpha peak activity [8]. This outcome suggests that the intended modulatory effects of auditory-visual stimulation on alpha-peak activity may not be as readily achievable under the conditions tested in this study. Fourteen volunteers received 16 sessions of combined auditory-visual stimulation in patterns of alpha and beta bands (7.8, 8.8, 12.8, 13.4, 14.4, 18, 19, and 23 Hz) over four weeks. In comparison, seven volunteers in the control group received auditory-only stimulation for two sessions. EEG recordings were taken at the beginning and end of the study to measure individual alpha peak frequencies (iAPF) and assess entrainment and resonance effects. Resting-state recordings (eyes open and eyes closed) during two lab sessions, one in week one and one in week four, were conducted for five minutes each before and after the stimulation session. Each stimulation session lasted approximately 16 min and consisted of three repetitions of the visual and auditory stimulation patterns. The study found no significant differences in individual alpha peak frequencies (iAPF) between week one and week four for the study and control groups. These first EEG studies suggested that AVE may interact with brain oscillatory behavior, which may be a proxy for treating diseases showing altered brain rhythms [8].

6. The Current State of AVE

Although AVE is not a new technique, it is still young scientifically, as it remains insufficiently standardized and has not yet been systematically studied. Current findings suggest predominantly positive outcomes, highlighting AVE’s promise as a therapeutic intervention that warrants further detailed investigation. At the same time, the available evidence is not uniformly positive. For example, it has been found that AVS substantially improved mood and mood-sensitive cognitive tasks, but the effects were largely restricted to self-reported affective states rather than broader clinical outcomes [120]. A non-controlled feasibility study reported within-participant improvements in sleep, pain, fatigue, and mood following pre-sleep alpha entrainment, yet the absence of a control group limited conclusions about specific AVE effects [74]. In contrast, a pilot randomized trial showed that although older adults with comorbid insomnia and osteoarthritis pain reported improvements in sleep and mood, these changes were also present in the placebo group, resulting in no significant between-group differences [76]. Finally, another study demonstrated across multiple experiments that 40 Hz audiovisual stimulation did not enhance visual thresholds or spatial memory, with observed changes primarily reflecting practice effects [6]. Taken together, these findings illustrate that while AVE holds promise, its effects are not universal and may vary depending on study design, outcome measures, and target population.
This review represents one of the first attempts to provide a structured framework for AVE by disentangling its components and modes of stimulation. Such a framework may enable future studies and reviews to evaluate AVE with greater precision, as most prior investigations have failed to report these parameters comprehensively. However, many of the materials and concepts applied here are indirect, borrowed from other neuromodulation techniques. Future work should directly examine the essential parameters of AVE including the main stimulation color, primary frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta sub-bands, and gamma), phase offsets, signal shape, and differences between right and left visual field stimulation rather than relying on extrapolations.
Beyond these structural considerations, several empirical uncertainties remain unresolved. For example, it is still unknown how long stimulation must be applied within a single session to achieve maximal effects, how long such effects persist after stimulation, whether repeated sessions lead to habituation or sensitization, and what the long-term consequences may be. One study suggested that even a short exposure of five minutes may be sufficient, although this finding was limited to improving mood rather than broader clinical outcomes [116], making it insufficient to establish generalizable conclusions. Another study reported that no further changes occurred after the first week of intervention [7], yet this cannot be taken as evidence that one week represents the optimal duration of AVE. Rather, these findings highlight the current lack of consensus and underscore that the effective dosing and scheduling of AVE remain largely unknown parameters that require systematic investigation.
The safety profile of AVE also requires further clarification. Although existing studies suggest that the technique is generally well tolerated, the number of systematic safety evaluations is limited. More rigorous monitoring of adverse events and reports of non-effectiveness would help delineate the boundaries of safe and effective application.
AVE can be viewed as a practical application of DAT, as it uses timed auditory and visual pulses to guide neural and attentional rhythms. From a DAT perspective, such stimulation provides the temporal coherence needed for attunement, strengthening temporal expectancies and supporting future-oriented attending. This makes AVE a promising tool for scaffolding attentional mechanisms involved in language, reading, and other timing dependent skills. However, studies that have relied on DAT have mostly used auditory pulses [121,122,123,124,125,126,127], and no structured audiovisual rhythmic approach as introduced in this paper has yet been applied to test this theory directly. A detailed study examining the link between DAT and AVE would therefore be highly valuable and could substantially strengthen the theoretical and practical foundations of this technique.
Another challenge lies in the incomplete mechanistic understanding of AVE. Phenomena such as the “fusion illusion” where mismatched auditory and visual stimuli alter perceptual outcomes highlight the complexity of audiovisual integration [117,119]. Moreover, the possibility of combining AVE with other sensory modalities, such as rhythmic tactile stimulation, remains largely unexplored and could open new research avenues.
In summary, this review has sought to establish a clearer structure for AVE and to encourage systematic scientific investigation. While existing studies highlight substantial potential for benefits across mood, sleep, pain, and cognition, the evidence also remains mixed, with several investigations reporting null or limited effects depending on outcome measures and study design. This underscores the need for more rigorous, standardized, and controlled research before AVE can be regarded as a reliable therapeutic approach. Providing a framework for its parameters and modes of application is therefore an important step toward greater consistency in future trials and, ultimately, the establishment of its clinical value.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.R. and A.P.; Writing—original draft: M.R. and A.P.; Writing—review and editing; M.R., A.P. and L.J.R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AVEAudiovisual Entrainment
AVSAudiovisual Stimulation
ADAlzheimer’s Disease
BWEBrainwave Entrainment
DATDynamic Attending Theory
LSMLight and Sound Machines
NiBSNon-invasive Brain Stimulation
tDCSTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
rTMSRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
LGNLateral Geniculate Nucleus
RVFRight Visual Field
LVFLeft Visual Field
BBBinaural Beats
MBMonaural Beats
tACSTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation
tRNSTranscranial Random Noise Stimulation
ECEyes Closed
EOEyes Open
EEGElectroencephalography
iAPFIndividual Alpha Peak Frequency
HAMDHamilton Rating Scale for Depression
SADSeasonal Affective Disorder
QIPPerformance Intelligence Quotient
WAISRWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised
RPMRaven’s Progressive Matrices
SMRSensory Motor Rhythm

References

  1. Huang, T.L.; Charyton, C. A Comprehensive Review of the Psychological Effects of Brainwave Entrainment. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2008, 14, 38–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Siever, D.; Collura, T. Chapter 3—Audio–Visual Entrainment: Physiological Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes. In Rhythmic Stimulation Procedures in Neuromodulation; Evans, J.R., Turner, R.P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 51–95. ISBN 978-0-12-803726-3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson, L.; Alekseichuk, I.; Krieg, J.; Doyle, A.; Yu, Y.; Vitek, J.; Johnson, M.; Opitz, A. Dose-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Spike Timing in Awake Nonhuman Primates. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jones, M.R.; Boltz, M. Dynamic Attending and Responses to Time. Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96, 459–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brauchli, P.; Michel, C.M.; Zeier, H. Electrocortical, Autonomic, and Subjective Responses to Rhythmic Audio-Visual Stimulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. Off. J. Int. Organ. Psychophysiol. 1995, 19, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hsiung, P.-C.; Hsieh, P.-J. Forty-Hertz Audiovisual Stimulation Does Not Have a Promoting Effect on Visual Threshold and Visual Spatial Memory. J. Vis. 2024, 24, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mansouri, M.; Pouretemad, H.; Bigdeli, M.; Ardalan, M. Excessive Audio–Visual Stimulation Leads to Impaired Social Behaviour with an Effect on Amygdala: Early Life Excessive Exposure to Digital Devices in Male Rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022, 56, 6174–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oppermann, H.; Thelen, A.; Haueisen, J. Entrainment and Resonance Effects with a New Mobile Audio-Visual Stimulation Device. In Proceedings of the 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Sydney, Australia, 24–27 July 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tang, H.-Y.; Vitiello, M.V.; Perlis, M.; Mao, J.J.; Riegel, B. A Pilot Study of Audio–Visual Stimulation as a Self-Care Treatment for Insomnia in Adults with Insomnia and Chronic Pain. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2014, 39, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tang, H.-Y.J.; Riegel, B.; McCurry, S.M.; Vitiello, M.V. Open-Loop Audio-Visual Stimulation (AVS): A Useful Tool for Management of Insomnia? Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2016, 41, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Teplan, M.; Šušmakova, K.; Paluš, M.; Vejmĕlka, M. Phase Synchronization in Human EEG During Audio-Visual Stimulation. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2009, 28, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Timmermann, D.L.; Lubar, J.F.; Rasey, H.W.; Frederick, J.A. Effects of 20-Min Audio-Visual Stimulation (AVS) at Dominant Alpha Frequency and Twice Dominant Alpha Frequency on the Cortical EEG. Int. J. Psychophysiol. Off. J. Int. Organ. Psychophysiol. 1999, 32, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aftanas, L.; Miroshnikova, P.; Natalya, M.; Serguey, Y.; Olga, G.; Khazankin, G. Audio-Visual-Tactile Brainwave Entrainment Decreases Night Arterial Blood Pressure in Patients with Uncontrolled Essential Hypertension: Placebo Controlled Study. In Proceedings of the SAN2016 Meeting, Corfu, Greece, 6–9 October 2016; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Frohlich, F.; Riddle, J.; Ugen, G.; Lersch, F. Brainwave Entrainment for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Comment on Br J Pain 2020; 14: 161–70. Br. J. Pain 2021, 15, 369–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Locke, H.N.; Brooks, J.; Arendsen, L.J.; Jacob, N.K.; Casson, A.; Jones, A.K.; Sivan, M. Acceptability and Usability of Smartphone-Based Brainwave Entrainment Technology Used by Individuals with Chronic Pain in a Home Setting. Br. J. Pain 2020, 14, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hutchison, M. Megabrain: New Tools and Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion, 1st ed.; Beech Tree Books: New York, NY, USA, 1986; ISBN 978-0-688-04880-8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mind Machine. Wikipedia. 2024. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_machine (accessed on 20 October 2024).
  18. The Ultimate Guide To Brainwave Entrainment—SHIFT. Available online: https://www.shift.is/ultimate-guide-brainwave-entrainment/ (accessed on 26 September 2024).
  19. Hutchison, M. Time Flashes: A Short History of Sound and Light Technology. 1990. Available online: https://www.amadeux.net/sublimen/documenti/REF_TimeFlashes.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2024).
  20. Siggins, D.R. The Effects of a Light and Sound Machine on the Panic of Outpatient Agoraphobics: An Outcome Study of in Vivo Exposure Treatment; University of San Francisco: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  21. da Silva, V.F.; Ribeiro, A.P.; dos Santos, V.A.; Nardi, A.E.; King, A.L.S.; Calomeni, M.R. Stimulation by Light and Sound: Therapeutics Effects in Humans. Systematic Review. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2015, 11, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Larkin, H. Noninvasive Sensory Stimulation With Light and Sound Tested in Alzheimer Disease. JAMA 2023, 329, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Budzynski, T.; Jordy, J.; Budzynski, H.K.; Tang, H.-Y.; Claypoole, K. Academic Performance Enhancement with Photic Stimulation and EDR Feedback. J. Neurother. 1999, 3, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leonard, K.N.; Telch, M.J.; Harrington, P.J. Dissociation in the Laboratory: A Comparison of Strategies. Behav. Res. Ther. 1999, 37, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sanchez, D.I.; Collins, T.; Stone, R. Effect of 10 and 20 Hz Photic Stimulation on Stress and Temperature of the Fingers. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 3–4 December 2012; pp. 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  26. Brainwave Synchronizer. Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology. Available online: https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/museum/brainwave-synchronizer/ (accessed on 16 December 2024).
  27. Morse, D.R. Brain Wave Synchronizers: A Review of Their Stress Reduction Effects and Clinical Studies Assessed by Questionnaire, Galvanic Skin Resistance, Pulse Rate, Saliva, and Electroencephalograph. Stress Med. 1993, 9, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bouwer, A.; Holland, S.; Dalgleish, M. The Haptic Bracelets: Learning Multi-Limb Rhythm Skills from Haptic Stimuli While Reading. In Music and Human-Computer Interaction; Holland, S., Wilkie, K., Mulholland, P., Seago, A., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2013; pp. 101–122. ISBN 978-1-4471-2990-5. [Google Scholar]
  29. Carver, C.S.; White, T.L. Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 67, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blanpain, L.T.; Cole, E.R.; Chen, E.; Park, J.K.; Walelign, M.Y.; Gross, R.E.; Cabaniss, B.T.; Willie, J.T.; Singer, A.C. Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Làdavas, E.; Tosatto, L.; Bertini, C. Behavioural and Functional Changes in Neglect after Multisensory Stimulation. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2022, 32, 662–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tajadura-Jiménez, A.; Grehl, S.; Tsakiris, M. The Other in Me: Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation Changes the Mental Representation of the Self. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, L. The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; ISBN 978-0-521-01064-1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler, Lindberg. Available online: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo28119973.html (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  35. Bobon, D.P.; Lecoq, A.; Von Frenckell, R.; Mormont, I.; Lavergne, G.; Lottin, T. Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency in Psychopathology and Psychopharmacology. Review of the Literature. Acta Psychiatr. Belg. 1982, 82, 7–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Harner, M.J. The Way of the Shaman, 10th ed.; 1st Harper & Row pbk. ed.; Harper & Row: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1990; ISBN 978-0-06-250382-4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sreeraj, V.; Arumugham, S.; Venkatasubramanian, G. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatry. Indian J. Psychiatry 2023, 65, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rosenfeld, J.P.; Reinhart, A.M.; Srivastava, S. The Effects of Alpha (10-Hz) and Beta (22-Hz) “Entrainment” Stimulation on the Alpha and Beta EEG Bands: Individual Differences Are Critical to Prediction of Effects. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 1997, 22, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fregni, F.; El-Hagrassy, M.M.; Pacheco-Barrios, K.; Carvalho, S.; Leite, J.; Simis, M.; Brunelin, J.; Nakamura-Palacios, E.M.; Marangolo, P.; Venkatasubramanian, G.; et al. Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021, 24, 256–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kekic, M.; Boysen, E.; Campbell, I.C.; Schmidt, U. A Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Psychiatric Disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2016, 74, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuo, M.-F.; Chen, P.-S.; Nitsche, M.A. The Application of tDCS for the Treatment of Psychiatric Diseases. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2017, 29, 146–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Unsworth, N.; Robison, M.K.; Miller, A.L. Individual Differences in Baseline Oculometrics: Examining Variation in Baseline Pupil Diameter, Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate, and Fixation Stability. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2019, 19, 1074–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kidd, G.R.; Watson, C.S.; Gygi, B. Individual Differences in Auditory Abilities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Babin, B.J.; Hardesty, D.M.; Suter, T.A. Color and Shopping Intentions. J. Bus. Res. 2003, 56, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kurt, S.; Osueke, K.K. The Effects of Color on the Moods of College Students. SAGE Open 2014, 4, 215824401452542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kwallek, N.; Lewis, C.M.; Robbins, A.S. Effects of Office Interior Color on Workers’ Mood and Productivity. Percept. Mot. Skills 1988, 66, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gerschlager, W.; Siebner, H.R.; Rothwell, J.C. Decreased Corticospinal Excitability after Subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over Lateral Premotor Cortex. Neurology 2001, 57, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fitzgerald, P.; Fountain, S.; Daskalakis, Z. A Comprehensive Review of the Effects of rTMS on Motor Cortical Excitability and Inhibition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117, 2584–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Addante, R.J.; Yousif, M.; Valencia, R.; Greenwood, C.; Marino, R. Boosting Brain Waves Improves Memory. Front. Young Minds 2021, 9, 605677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roberts, B.M.; Clarke, A.; Addante, R.J.; Ranganath, C. Entrainment Enhances Theta Oscillations and Improves Episodic Memory. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hadjipapas, A.; Charalambous, C.C.; Roberts, M.J. Editorial: Why the Exact Frequencies in Our Brains Matter: Perspectives from Electrophysiology and Brain Stimulation. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2023, 16, 1121438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jeffery, G. Architecture of the Optic Chiasm and the Mechanisms That Sculpt Its Development. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 1393–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Henriksson, L.; Karvonen, J.; Salminen-Vaparanta, N.; Railo, H.; Vanni, S. Retinotopic Maps, Spatial Tuning, and Locations of Human Visual Areas in Surface Coordinates Characterized with Multifocal and Blocked fMRI Designs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, L.; Bin, G.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Gao, S.; Gao, X. Optimizing a Left and Right Visual Field Biphasic Stimulation Paradigm for SSVEP-Based BCIs with Hairless Region behind the Ear. J. Neural Eng. 2021, 18, 066040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vanegas, M.I.; Blangero, A.; Kelly, S.P. Exploiting Individual Primary Visual Cortex Geometry to Boost Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials. J. Neural Eng. 2013, 10, 036003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Teng, F.; Chen, Y.; Choong, A.M.; Gustafson, S.; Reichley, C.; Lawhead, P.; Waddell, D. Square or Sine: Finding a Waveform with High Success Rate of Eliciting SSVEP. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011, 364385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chatrian, G.E.; Petersen, M.C.; Lazarte, J.A. Responses to Clicks from the Human Brain: Some Depth Electrographic Observations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1960, 12, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oster, G. Auditory Beats in the Brain. Sci. Am. 1973, 229, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Engelbregt, H.; Barmentlo, M.; Keeser, D.; Pogarell, O.; Deijen, J.B. Effects of Binaural and Monaural Beat Stimulation on Attention and EEG. Exp. Brain Res. 2021, 239, 2781–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, J.; Zhou, L.; Wu, H.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, M.; Huang, L.; Lee, C.; Lane, T.J.; Qin, P. Eyes-Open and Eyes-Closed Resting State Network Connectivity Differences. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bourne, V.J. The Divided Visual Field Paradigm: Methodological Considerations. Laterality 2006, 11, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kuo, H.-H. White Noise Distribution Theory, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-0-203-73381-3. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mozes, G.; Gabay, S. Experimental Evidence for Involvement of Monocular Channels in Mental Rotation. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2023, 30, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Adrian, E.D.; Matthews, B.H.C. The Berger Rhythm: Potential Changes from the Occipital Lobes in Man. Brain 1934, 57, 355–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cantor, D.S.; Stevens, E. QEEG Correlates of Auditory-Visual Entrainment Treatment Efficacy of Refractory Depression. J. Neurother. 2009, 13, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pino, O.; Romano, G. Engagement and Arousal Effects in Predicting the Increase of Cognitive Functioning Following a Neuromodulation Program. Acta Biomed. Atenei Parm. 2022, 93, e2022248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Berg, K.; Siever, D. A Controlled Comparison of Audio-Visual Entrainment for Treating Seasonal Affective Disorder. J. Neurother. 2009, 13, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Klimesch, W. EEG Alpha and Theta Oscillations Reflect Cognitive and Memory Performance: A Review and Analysis. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 1999, 29, 169–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hanslmayr, S.; Sauseng, P.; Doppelmayr, M.; Schabus, M.; Klimesch, W. Increasing Individual Upper Alpha Power by Neurofeedback Improves Cognitive Performance in Human Subjects. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2005, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pearson, H.C.; Wilbiks, J.M.P. Effects of Audiovisual Memory Cues on Working Memory Recall. Vision 2021, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Seger, S.E.; Kriegel, J.L.S.; Lega, B.C.; Ekstrom, A.D. Memory-Related Processing Is the Primary Driver of Human Hippocampal Theta Oscillations. Neuron 2023, 111, 3119–3130.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Joyce, M.; Siever, D. Audio-Visual Entrainment Program as a Treatment for Behavior Disorders in a School Setting. J. Neurother. 2000, 4, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Siever, D. Audio-Visual Entrainment: History and Physiological Mechanisms. Biofeedback 2003, 31, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  74. Halpin, S.J.; Casson, A.J.; Tang, N.K.Y.; Jones, A.K.P.; O’Connor, R.J.; Sivan, M. A Feasibility Study of Pre-Sleep Audio and Visual Alpha Brain Entrainment for People with Chronic Pain and Sleep Disturbance. Front. Pain Res. 2023, 4, 1096084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chan, D.; Suk, H.-J.; Jackson, B.L.; Milman, N.P.; Stark, D.; Klerman, E.B.; Kitchener, E.; Avalos, V.S.F.; de Weck, G.; Banerjee, A.; et al. Gamma Frequency Sensory Stimulation in Mild Probable Alzheimer’s Dementia Patients: Results of Feasibility and Pilot Studies. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tang, H.-Y.; McCurry, S.M.; Pike, K.C.; Riegel, B.; Vitiello, M.V. Open-Loop Audio-Visual Stimulation for Sleep Promotion in Older Adults with Comorbid Insomnia and Osteoarthritis Pain: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Sleep Med. 2021, 82, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tang, H.-Y.; Vitiello, M.V.; Perlis, M.; Riegel, B. Open-Loop Neurofeedback Audiovisual Stimulation: A Pilot Study of Its Potential for Sleep Induction in Older Adults. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2015, 40, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Martins da Silva, A.; Leal, B. Photosensitivity and Epilepsy: Current Concepts and Perspectives—A Narrative Review. Seizure 2017, 50, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shepherd, A.J. Visual Stimuli, Light and Lighting Are Common Triggers of Migraine and Headache. J. Light Vis. Environ. 2010, 34, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stramaglia, S.; Marinazzo, D.; Pellicoro, M.; de Tommaso, M. Abnormal Effective Connectivity in Migraine with Aura under Photic Stimulation. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1104.2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Depressive Disorder (Depression). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression (accessed on 10 July 2025).
  82. Lam, R.W.; Kennedy, S.H.; McIntyre, R.S.; Khullar, A. Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Effects on Psychosocial Functioning and Implications for Treatment. Can. J. Psychiatry 2014, 59, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vieta, E.; Alonso, J.; Pérez-Sola, V.; Roca, M.; Hernando, T.; Sicras-Mainar, A.; Sicras-Navarro, A.; Herrera, B.; Gabilondo, A. Epidemiology and Costs of Depressive Disorder in Spain: The EPICO Study. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021, 50, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Salvador-Carulla, L.; Bendeck, M.; Fernández, A.; Alberti, C.; Sabes-Figuera, R.; Molina, C.; Knapp, M. Costs of Depression in Catalonia (Spain). J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 132, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mekonen, T.; Chan, G.C.K.; Connor, J.P.; Hides, L.; Leung, J. Estimating the Global Treatment Rates for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 295, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pino, O. Neuro-Upper, a Novel Technology for Audio-Visual Entrainment. A Randomized Controlled Trial on Individuals with Anxiety and Depressive Disorders. BAOJ Med. Nurs. 2017, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pino, O. A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to Explore the Effect of Audio-Visual Entrainment among Psychological Disorders.: Neuro-Upper. Acta Biomed. Atenei Parm. 2021, 92, e2021408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Text Revision; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  89. Melrose, S. Seasonal Affective Disorder: An Overview of Assessment and Treatment Approaches. Depress. Res. Treat. 2015, 2015, 178564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ellis, J.; Ferini-Strambi, L.; García-Borreguero, D.; Heidbreder, A.; O’Regan, D.; Parrino, L.; Selsick, H.; Penzel, T. Chronic Insomnia Disorder across Europe: Expert Opinion on Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Care. Healthcare 2023, 11, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Perlis, M.L.; Smith, M.T.; Andrews, P.J.; Orff, H.; Giles, D.E. Beta/Gamma EEG Activity in Patients with Primary and Secondary Insomnia and Good Sleeper Controls. Sleep 2001, 24, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wu, Y.M.; Pietrone, R.; Cashmere, J.D.; Begley, A.; Miewald, J.M.; Germain, A.; Buysse, D.J. EEG Power During Waking and NREM Sleep in Primary Insomnia. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2013, 09, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kang, J.M.; Cho, S.-E.; Moon, J.Y.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, J.W.; Kang, S.-G. Difference in Spectral Power Density of Sleep Electroencephalography between Individuals without Insomnia and Frequent Hypnotic Users with Insomnia Complaints. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Medic, G.; Wille, M.; Hemels, M. Short- and Long-Term Health Consequences of Sleep Disruption. Nat. Sci. Sleep 2017, 9, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kiely, K.M. Cognitive Function. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research; Michalos, A.C., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 974–978. ISBN 978-94-007-0752-8. [Google Scholar]
  96. Berka, C.; Levendowski, D.J.; Lumicao, M.N.; Yau, A.; Davis, G.; Zivkovic, V.T.; Olmstead, R.E.; Tremoulet, P.D.; Craven, P.L. EEG Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2007, 78, B231–B244. [Google Scholar]
  97. Hutchison, I.C.; Rathore, S. The Role of REM Sleep Theta Activity in Emotional Memory. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nyhus, E.; Engel, W.A.; Pitfield, T.D.; Vakkur, I.M.W. Increases in Theta Oscillatory Activity During Episodic Memory Retrieval Following Mindfulness Meditation Training. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ayano, G.; Demelash, S.; Gizachew, Y.; Tsegay, L.; Alati, R. The Global Prevalence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 339, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ayano, G.; Tsegay, L.; Gizachew, Y.; Necho, M.; Yohannes, K.; Abraha, M.; Demelash, S.; Anbesaw, T.; Alati, R. Prevalence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Umbrella Review of Evidence Generated across the Globe. Psychiatry Res. 2023, 328, 115449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Oberauer, K. Working Memory and Attention—A Conceptual Analysis and Review. J. Cogn. 2019, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Barry, R.J.; Clarke, A.R.; Johnstone, S.J. A Review of Electrophysiology in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: I. Qualitative and Quantitative Electroencephalography. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kamida, A.; Shimabayashi, K.; Oguri, M.; Takamori, T.; Ueda, N.; Koyanagi, Y.; Sannomiya, N.; Nagira, H.; Ikunishi, S.; Hattori, Y.; et al. EEG Power Spectrum Analysis in Children with ADHD. Yonago Acta Med. 2016, 59, 169–173. [Google Scholar]
  104. Siever, D. Audio-Visual Entrainment: Applying Audio-Visual Entrainment Technology for Attention and Learning. Biofeedback Mag. 2008, 31, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  105. Driver, J.; Mattingley, J.B. Parietal Neglect and Visual Awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. McKhann, G.M.; Knopman, D.S.; Chertkow, H.; Hyman, B.T.; Jack, C.R.; Kawas, C.H.; Klunk, W.E.; Koroshetz, W.J.; Manly, J.J.; Mayeux, R.; et al. The Diagnosis of Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement. J. Alzheimers Assoc. 2011, 7, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Javaid, S.F.; Giebel, C.; Khan, M.A.; Hashim, M.J. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias: Rising Global Burden and Forecasted Trends. F1000Research 2021, 10, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rababa, M.; Aldrawsheh, A.; Hayajneh, A.A.; Da’seh, A. Environmental and Caregivers-Related Factors Influencing the Psychosocial Well-Being of Older Adults with Dementia: A Systematic Review. Ageing Int. 2023, 48, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Baert, V.; Cornelis, E.; DeVriendt, P. Dementia-Friendly Communities and Challenges from Built Environment Design: The Belgian Case. In Urban Design and Planning for Age-Friendly Environments Across Europe: North and South: Developing Healthy and Therapeutic Living Spaces for Local Contexts; Pozo Menéndez, E., Higueras García, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 311–334. ISBN 978-3-030-93875-8. [Google Scholar]
  110. Lue, L.-F.; Guerra, A.; Walker, D.G. Amyloid Beta and Tau as Alzheimer’s Disease Blood Biomarkers: Promise From New Technologies. Neurol. Ther. 2017, 6, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jiao, B.; Li, R.; Zhou, H.; Qing, K.; Liu, H.; Pan, H.; Lei, Y.; Fu, W.; Wang, X.; Xiao, X.; et al. Neural Biomarker Diagnosis and Prediction to Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease Using EEG Technology. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2023, 15, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Manippa, V.; Palmisano, A.; Filardi, M.; Vilella, D.; Nitsche, M.A.; Rivolta, D.; Logroscino, G. An Update on the Use of Gamma (Multi)Sensory Stimulation for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 1095081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Martorell, A.J.; Paulson, A.L.; Suk, H.-J.; Abdurrob, F.; Drummond, G.; Guan, W.; Young, J.Z.; Kim, D.N.-W.; Kritskiy, O.; Barker, S.; et al. Multi-Sensory Gamma Stimulation Ameliorates Alzheimer’s-Associated Pathology and Improves Cognition. Cell 2019, 177, 256–271.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, H.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Zhao, Y. Non-Invasive 40-Hz Light Flicker Ameliorates Alzheimer’s-Associated Rhythm Disorder via Regulating Central Circadian Clock in Mice. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zimmer, Z.; Fraser, K.; Grol-Prokopczyk, H.; Zajacova, A. A Global Study of Pain Prevalence across 52 Countries: Examining the Role of Country-Level Contextual Factors. Pain 2022, 163, 1740–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Boersma, F.J.; Gagnon, C. The Use of Repetitive Audiovisual Entrainment in the Management of Chronic Pain. Med. Hypnoanal. J. 1992, 7, 80–97. [Google Scholar]
  117. Vincent, A.; Lahr, B.D.; Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Whipple, M.O.; Oh, T.H.; Barton, D.L.; St. Sauver, J. Prevalence of Fibromyalgia: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, Utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Arthritis Care Res. 2013, 65, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Berg, K. Outcome of Medical Methods, Audio-Visual Entrainment (AVE) and Nutritional Supplementation for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 2006, 26, 140–149. [Google Scholar]
  119. Baars, B.; Gage, N.M. Fundamentals of Cognitive Neuroscience: A Beginner’s Guide; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; ISBN 0-12-415805-6. [Google Scholar]
  120. Johnson, M.A.; Simonian, N.; Reggente, N. Lightening the Mind with Audiovisual Stimulation as an Accessible Alternative to Breath-Focused Meditation for Mood and Cognitive Enhancement. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 25553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Canette, L.-H.; Fiveash, A.; Krzonowski, J.; Corneyllie, A.; Lalitte, P.; Thompson, D.; Trainor, L.; Bedoin, N.; Tillmann, B. Regular Rhythmic Primes Boost P600 in Grammatical Error Processing in Dyslexic Adults and Matched Controls. Neuropsychologia 2020, 138, 107324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Bedoin, N.; Brisseau, L.; Molinier, P.; Roch, D.; Tillmann, B. Temporally Regular Musical Primes Facilitate Subsequent Syntax Processing in Children with Specific Language Impairment. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Przybylski, L.; Bedoin, N.; Krifi-Papoz, S.; Herbillon, V.; Roch, D.; Léculier, L.; Kotz, S.A.; Tillmann, B. Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Influences Syntactic Processing in Children with Developmental Language Disorders. Neuropsychology 2013, 27, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Fiveash, A.; Bedoin, N.; Lalitte, P.; Tillmann, B. Rhythmic Priming of Grammaticality Judgments in Children: Duration Matters. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2020, 197, 104885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fiveash, A.; Bedoin, N.; Gordon, R.L.; Tillmann, B. Processing Rhythm in Speech and Music: Shared Mechanisms and Implications for Developmental Speech and Language Disorders. Neuropsychology 2021, 35, 771–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. György, D.; Saddy, D.; Kotz, S.A.; Franck, J. Rhythmic Priming of Syntactic Processing in Jabberwocky: A Short-Lived Effect. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 2024, 39, 939–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. György, D.; Saddy, D.; Kotz, S.A.; Franck, J. Not Primed to Agree? Short or No Effect of Rhythmic Priming on Typical Adults Processing Number Agreement. Front. Psychol. 2025, 16, 1512267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Example of color presentation through a commercial audiovisual entrainment (AVE) device. The device consists of eight light-emitting diodes (LEDs), with four LEDs positioned for each eye. For each eye, two LEDs target the left visual field and two LEDs target the right visual field. In this configuration, the left visual field is illuminated with yellow light, and the right visual field is illuminated with blue light. The colors shown are representative of a common experimental setup; yellow and blue were selected because different wavelengths can evoke distinct physiological and psychological responses, as reported in prior research [44,45,46].
Figure 1. Example of color presentation through a commercial audiovisual entrainment (AVE) device. The device consists of eight light-emitting diodes (LEDs), with four LEDs positioned for each eye. For each eye, two LEDs target the left visual field and two LEDs target the right visual field. In this configuration, the left visual field is illuminated with yellow light, and the right visual field is illuminated with blue light. The colors shown are representative of a common experimental setup; yellow and blue were selected because different wavelengths can evoke distinct physiological and psychological responses, as reported in prior research [44,45,46].
Brainsci 15 01070 g001
Figure 2. Depiction of two sinusoidal waveforms with amplitudes scaled from 0 to 1 nanometer (nm) and no interval between the flickers, allowing direct interpretation of displacement as a positive physical quantity. The blue solid waveform is phase-aligned to begin at (0 s, 0 nm), where it gradually rises to its peak in a smooth curve before descending back toward its minimum, forming a continuous oscillatory cycle characteristic of sinusoidal motion. The red dashed waveform is offset by 0.25 s relative to the blue waveform, illustrating a constant phase difference between the two signals. This phase arrangement could be applied to stimulate the right visual field of both eyes and the left visual field of the right eye, with the aim of selectively engaging the left and right brain hemispheres.
Figure 2. Depiction of two sinusoidal waveforms with amplitudes scaled from 0 to 1 nanometer (nm) and no interval between the flickers, allowing direct interpretation of displacement as a positive physical quantity. The blue solid waveform is phase-aligned to begin at (0 s, 0 nm), where it gradually rises to its peak in a smooth curve before descending back toward its minimum, forming a continuous oscillatory cycle characteristic of sinusoidal motion. The red dashed waveform is offset by 0.25 s relative to the blue waveform, illustrating a constant phase difference between the two signals. This phase arrangement could be applied to stimulate the right visual field of both eyes and the left visual field of the right eye, with the aim of selectively engaging the left and right brain hemispheres.
Brainsci 15 01070 g002
Figure 3. (A) delivering light into both eyes and visual fields. (B) Delivering into right visual field. (C) Delivering into left visual field.
Figure 3. (A) delivering light into both eyes and visual fields. (B) Delivering into right visual field. (C) Delivering into left visual field.
Brainsci 15 01070 g003
Table 1. AVE parameter reporting checklist and selection guide. This table outlines the key parameters currently understood to influence Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE). Including and clearly reporting these conditions in future research may support greater methodological consistency and contribute to the gradual development of standardized AVE protocols.
Table 1. AVE parameter reporting checklist and selection guide. This table outlines the key parameters currently understood to influence Audiovisual Entrainment (AVE). Including and clearly reporting these conditions in future research may support greater methodological consistency and contribute to the gradual development of standardized AVE protocols.
Visual
Condition
Monocular/
Binocular
Visual FieldFrequencyPhasePresentation ModeColor
Visual
Stimuli
ECBinocu
lar Visual Exposure
RVFX0–1Static FrequencyX
EOUnilateral Visual ExposureLVFVLF = X
RVF = Y
Ramp Up/DownX for RVF
Y for LVF
RVF/LVF Random Frequency RangeX for Left Eye
Y for Right Eye
Predefined Frequency Range
Experimental ConditionBinauralBinaural/
Monaural Beats
FrequencyPresentation Mode
Auditory StimuliBinauralSpontaneous
Bilateral
Auditory Pitch DifferenceXStatic Frequency
or Altering
Unilateral
X for Left
Y for Right
Ramp Up/Down
Random Frequency Range
Predefined Frequency Range
Monaural
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahmani, M.; Romero Lauro, L.J.; Pisoni, A. Audio-Visual Entrainment Neuromodulation: A Review of Technical and Functional Aspects. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101070

AMA Style

Rahmani M, Romero Lauro LJ, Pisoni A. Audio-Visual Entrainment Neuromodulation: A Review of Technical and Functional Aspects. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(10):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahmani, Masoud, Leonor Josefina Romero Lauro, and Alberto Pisoni. 2025. "Audio-Visual Entrainment Neuromodulation: A Review of Technical and Functional Aspects" Brain Sciences 15, no. 10: 1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101070

APA Style

Rahmani, M., Romero Lauro, L. J., & Pisoni, A. (2025). Audio-Visual Entrainment Neuromodulation: A Review of Technical and Functional Aspects. Brain Sciences, 15(10), 1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop