Next Article in Journal
Excellent Interrater Reliability for Manual Segmentation of the Medial Perirhinal Cortex
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrastructural Changes of Neuroendocrine Pheochromocytoma Cell Line PC-12 Exposed In Vitro to Rotenone
Previous Article in Journal
Reversed Mirror Therapy (REMIT) after Stroke—A Proof-of-Concept Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/brainsci13060848
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Investigating the Robustness of a Rodent “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as an Animal Model for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review

by
Khanyiso Bright Shangase
*,
Mluleki Luvuno
and
Musa V. Mabandla
Department of Human Physiology, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Science, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(6), 848; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060848
Submission received: 11 April 2023 / Revised: 16 May 2023 / Accepted: 21 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Studies of the Neuron Model of Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric disorder comprising positive, negative, and cognitive impairments. Most of the animal models developed to understand the neurobiology and mechanism of schizophrenia do not produce all the symptoms of the disease. Therefore, researchers need to develop new animal models with greater translational reliability, and the ability to produce most if not all symptoms of schizophrenia. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the rodent “double hit” (post-weaning social isolation and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist) model to produce symptoms of schizophrenia. This systematic review was developed according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines and checklist. The MEDLINE (PubMed) and Ebscohost databases were used to search for studies. The systematic review is based on quantitative animal studies. Studies in languages other than English that could be translated sufficiently using Google translate were also included. Data extraction was performed individually by two independent reviewers and discrepancies between them were resolved by a third reviewer. SYRCLE’s risk-of-bias tool was used to test the quality and biases of included studies. Our primary search yielded a total of 47 articles, through different study selection processes. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Ten of the seventeen studies found that the “double hit” model was more effective in developing various symptoms of schizophrenia. Most studies showed that the “double hit” model is robust and capable of inducing cognitive impairments and positive symptoms of schizophrenia.

1. Introduction

Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder that is generally characterized by profound impairment in thinking which affects language, sense of self, and perception [1]. Schizophrenia affects more than 21 million individuals globally [1]. The symptoms of the disease are divided into three categories, viz., positive, negative, and cognitive [2,3]. Positive symptoms include hallucinations and delusions, and negative symptoms include avolition, deficits in social functioning, anhedonia, and blunted affects, while cognitive symptoms are deficits in attention and perception, in executive control, and in working and long-term memory [4,5]. Schizophrenia onset usually manifests during post adolescence (16–25 years) [6]. Males usually show significantly higher incidences of schizophrenia than females [7]. Schizophrenia treatment focuses on the stage when the affected patients show clear clinical symptoms, such as psychosis [8]. The well-documented mechanisms of action for the antipsychotic treatment involve correcting the high levels of dopamine turnover in the striatum [9]. Schizophrenia patients at the first episode of the disorder respond reasonably well to treatment; the challenge is to keep them in a good state [10,11]. Previous studies have proposed that D-serine and glycine can improve negative and positive symptoms, but this has not been observed for cognitive impairments [12,13]. α 2/3-selective agonist and α 5-selective inverse agonist are selective GABAergic drugs that have been proposed to improve cognition in schizophrenia patients [8]. Animal models of schizophrenia are used to study multifactorial psychiatric disorders including the neurobiological basis of different disorders [6].
When compared to humans, animal models produce a speedy platform to examine structural and molecular alterations that trigger the cause of the pathology, and to test innovative therapeutics that are not possible to investigate in humans [6]. There are more than 20 different animal models of schizophrenia, and they are divided into four categories: developmental, lesion, genetic manipulation, and drug induced [6]. Rodents are social mammals and housing in a group or in isolation has been shown to affect behaviour [14,15]. Post-weaning social isolation of rats by placing them individually results in social deprivation that causes permanent changes in brain development, which may lead to behavioural deficits in adulthood [16,17]. Post-weaning social isolation in rodents produces spontaneous hyper-locomotor activity, sensorimotor gating deficits, enhanced response to novelty, heightened anxiety states, aggression, and cognitive impairment [17,18,19,20,21,22]. All these changes are collectively called isolation syndrome, and some resemble the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. When placed in an aversive novel arena, socially isolated rats are more active than their non-isolated counterparts [23,24]. The robustness of social isolation can be reduced by changing the type of rat strain, gender, caging condition, and routine handling [25]. Positive symptoms can be treated with antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol and olanzapine, while negative and cognitive symptoms remain resistant to the available antipsychotic treatment [6].
Studies have shown that glutamatergic pathway dysfunction is a fundamental pathological shift seen in schizophrenia [26,27,28]. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) has been shown to play a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia [28]. Treating rats with NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists (PCP or MK801 or ketamine) induces several behavioural abnormalities such as impairments in reversal learning, social interaction, prepulse inhibition (PPI), and working memory [29,30,31,32]. These are similar to those observed in schizophrenia. Most rodent models of schizophrenia tend to replicate aspects of the positive symptoms. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of a schizophrenic animal model that will adequately replicate positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of the disorder. Researchers have started designing the “double hit” model by combining post-weaning social isolation and an NMDA receptor antagonist to develop a strong animal model of schizophrenia that has the potential to replicate positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms [33,34,35].

1.1. Study Aim

The present review aimed to evaluate work published on the effectiveness of the “double hit” model in producing all the symptoms of schizophrenia.

1.2. Study Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of “double hit” model of schizophrenia in producing positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.
To assess the strength of the “double hit” model of schizophrenia as a reliable developmental model of schizophrenia.

2. Methods

This systematic review is registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021247585). This systematic review was developed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist of 2020 [36].

2.1. Search Strategy

Medical search headings (MeSH) were used in the formulation of a systematic search strategy. PubMed and Ebscohost databases were utilized to search for published studies. The literature search focused on the English language only and animals (rodent) subjects; all databases were searched until 30 May 2023. All included study reference lists were scanned to confirm the literature saturation. Lastly, the bibliography of all the included studies was circulated to the systematic review team and other schizophrenia experts chosen by the team. The literature search was undertaken by two independent authors (KBS and ML) and another (MM) was approached for arbitration. The literature search was based on these keywords and rodent subject headings: “schizophrenia”, “social isolation”, “NMDA receptor antagonists”, “basic research”, and “animal models”.

2.2. Selection Process

The systematic review is based on quantitative animal studies. Studies in other languages that were successfully and sufficiently translated to English by Google Translate were also included. The process of screening studies was conducted by two authors independently (KBS and ML) to eliminate any inconsistencies in terms of the fitness of studies. The screening of studies was performed in the following order: title, abstract, keywords and synonyms followed by full-text screening. All studies that induce schizophrenic-like symptoms using a “double hit” rodent model (post-weaning social isolation and NMDA receptor antagonist) were included. Any disagreements between two authors (KBS and ML) were resolved by allowing the third author (MM) to screen those studies and then after discussion an agreement was reached. The PRISMA flow diagram was utilized to document the final selection process. All included studies were subjected to data collection, and quality assessment.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data extraction was executed by two authors independently (KBS and ML), and the third author (MM) was approached in case of any disagreements between two authors. All important information, such as the authors, country, year of publication, study design, sample size, rodent characteristics (strain, gender, and age), NMDA receptor antagonists used and dosage, period of isolation, symptom severity, types of control used, and control of symptoms if included, were recorded in a Microsoft Excel table created by two authors (KBS and ML). The third author (MM) read and approved the content of this Microsoft Excel table. Included studies consisted of different social isolation periods, different NMDA receptor antagonists, and different NMDA receptor antagonist dosages. Groups from various arms of the study were merged into a single group to avoid the possibility of introducing bias caused by multiple statistical comparisons with one control group.

2.4. Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment

SYRCLE’s risk-of-bias tool was utilized to test the quality and possibility of bias in all included studies [37]. The SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool is a derived version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Evidence from the included studies was critically appraised by the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool. SYRCLE risk of bias is made up of ten entries, and these entries answer questions that are related to the following topics: selection bias, detection bias, performance bias, reporting bias, attrition bias, and other biases [37]. To assist in reaching a strong judgment, additional signalling questions are included. “Yes” means a low risk of bias, “no” means high risk of bias, and “unclear” means an unclear risk of bias [37]. If one of the questions is answered with “no,” this means a high risk of bias for that entry [37]. Two independent authors (KBS and ML) evaluated the quality of each included study. In case of disagreements between two authors, the third author (MM) was asked to adjudicate.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Our primary search yielded a total of 47 articles (Figure 1). Through different study selection processes, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review [33,34,35,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Eight studies used Sprague Dawley rats [34,39,40,41,42,43,44,48], three studies used Lister-hooded rats [46,47,49], three studies used Wistar rats [38,45,50], and another three studies used mice [33,35,51]. All studies used male animals except one that used both male and female animals [45]. Most studies originated from Europe; the United Kingdom [46,47,49], and Spain [33,35,51] each had three studies, Hungary [38,45] had two, while France [50] and Germany [44] had one each. North America (Canada) produced five papers [39,40,41,42,43], and Asia (China) two papers [34,48].

3.2. Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment

The quality scores of each study assessing the risk of bias are displayed in Table 1. All studies showed a high level of quality. There is one study with “no” response to the question; this response negatively affected the quality of the study [48]. All studies included the control group or animals without treatment (group housed + saline/vehicle), and all studies used the control group as the normal group.

3.3. Effectiveness and Robustness of the “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model of Schizophrenia

Ten studies found that the “double hit” model is more effective when compared to the intervention using social isolation on its own or an NMDA receptor antagonist [33,35,40,44,45,46,47,49,50,51]. Three of these studies were able to produce positive symptoms of schizophrenia, which is the impairment on the locomotor activity [40,47,50]. Other studies showed that the “double hit” model produced impairments on the novel object discrimination test [46,47]; furthermore, another study showed impairment on the social recognition test [50], and these are related to cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Another study reported the presence of heat shock protein 70 in brain regions of animals treated with the “double hit” model of schizophrenia [44]. The “double hit” model induces reductions in prepulse inhibition and reduced cingulate 1 cortex volume [35]. Seven studies did not find the “double hit” model to be more effective when compared to each treatment alone [34,38,39,41,42,43,48].

3.4. The Effect of “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model of Schizophrenia on Neurotransmitters

One study reported disturbance in excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmitter balance in the key brain region [33]. The study of Shortall et al. [49] reported reduced glutamate release. Two studies reported decreased hippocampus and prefrontal cortex GABA release [40], and reduced Gad67 expression [35]. Another study reported a significant decrease in the number of PV+ interneurons and perineuronal nets when compared to normal control [51].

3.5. Use of “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as a Developmental Model of Schizophrenia

Ten studies found that the “double hit” model is more effective when compared to an intervention using social isolation on its own or an NMDA receptor antagonist [33,35,40,44,45,46,47,49,50,51]. Four of these studies injected phencyclidine (PCP) on PND7, PND9, and PND11 [46,47,49,50], three studies injected MK801 on PND7 [33,35,51]. Post-weaning social isolation period varied per study, but seven studies started social isolation on PND21 [33,35,40,44,49,50,51], while other three studies started the social isolation on PND23 [45,46,47].
Brainsci 13 00848 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study selection process and the characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study selection process and the characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 2.
Brainsci 13 00848 g001

4. Discussion

Studies have shown that schizophrenia incidence is significantly higher in males than in females [52,53]. Furthermore, these studies proposed that the overall male:female risk ratio is 1.4:1. This difference could not be explained by methodological factors connected to age variety or diagnostic criteria [7,52,53]. In this review, we showed that most studies used male rodents. We found that from the studies that used rats, 50% of them used Sprague Dawley rats, while 25% of them used Lister hooded rats, and another 25% used Wistar rats. Rats are commonly used as animal models of schizophrenia because they are social animals and their behaviour better mimics the behaviour seen in humans [54]. The main reason why fewer studies have used mice as animal models of schizophrenia could be that sometimes it is difficult to work with mice as they are more aggressive when compared to rats [54]. Different studies used different NMDA receptor antagonists; ten animals used MK801, while four used phencyclidine and two used ketamine. Scientists prefer ketamine over phencyclidine because phencyclidine produces high levels of neurotoxicity and severe hallucinations [55]. Neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies concluded that for ethical reasons MK801 and ketamine are to be preferred over phencyclidine [56]. MK801 produces much longer-lasting symptoms than ketamine and phencyclidine, and the fact that it is safer than phencyclidine is the reason most studies employ it.

4.1. “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model on Neurotransmitters

A study found an imbalance on excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala of “double hit” (Mk801-SI) mice [33]. Furthermore, imbalances in excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission on vital brain regions has been found to be an underlying factor in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia [33]. The “double hit” model has also been reported to have an influence in the release of different neurotransmitters. One study on the “double hit” model found a reduction in the number of PV+ interneurons; these are fast-spiking GABAergic neurons that modulate inhibitory control in both cortical and subcortical circuits [51]. They also reported reduced perineuronal nets, which provide a protective layer, maintain optimum local ionic homeostasis, and provide neuronal protection against oxidative stress [51]. A study on the (PCP-SI) model reported the downregulation of several GABA-associated genes, such as the PVALB gene encoding parvalbumin and three GABA receptor subunit genes (GABBR1, GABRA4, GABRB2) [47]. One study proposed that the increase in locomotor activity may be caused by decreased on the inhibitory neurotransmitter (GABA) function in the mesolimbic region and prefrontal cortex [40]. Six genes encoding enzymes that control glutamate metabolism were significantly downregulated in PCP-SI rats [47]. It was not immediately evident if the downregulation of these genes is a compensatory outcome of lower basal glutamate in (PCP-SI) rats or a direct cause of the developmental manipulation [47].

4.2. “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model on Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Ten studies showed that the “double hit” model produced greater behavioural and physiological deficits than observed with either treatment alone [33,35,40,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Three studies found that the “double hit” model caused locomotor hyperactivity, which is a positive symptom of schizophrenia [40,47,50]. Locomotor hyperactivity is expressed as increased horizontal activity and is easily noticeably after the first 15 min in an open field test. This is caused by increase in mesolimbic dopamine and its serves as a baseline for the positive symptoms of schizophrenia [24]. Two studies found that the “double hit” model caused impairment in the PPI, which is linked to sensorimotor gating deficits [35,48]. It has been shown that this PPI impairment is linked to the mesolimbic dopamine system because the injection of 6-hydroxydopamine depletes dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and reverses PPI impairment [57].

4.3. “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model on Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Three studies showed that the “double hit” model (PCP-SI) causes cognitive impairments similar to those observed in patients with schizophrenia [46,49,50]. Two studies found that animals exposed to the “double hit” model failed to identify the difference between a familiar and a novel object in a novel discrimination paradigm [46,49]. The novel object recognition test measures visual recognition memory performance. This has translational relevance to one of the cognitive domains present in schizophrenia [58]. A study reported that “double hit” model (PCP-SI) rats were unable to recognize a juvenile rat contacted 30 min previously, possibly suggesting a lack of motivation to interact socially [50]. It has been reported that in the (MK801-SI) model, rats showed an increased expression of heat shock protein 70, a marker for neuronal damage in the neocortical regions [44]. NMDA receptor antagonist, which is used to induce schizophrenia, has been also proven to induce cortical injury (cell necrosis) in the neocortical regions [59]. Other studies have gone further to investigate if available drugs used to treat schizophrenia will be able to reverse different symptoms of schizophrenia induced by a “double hit” model.

4.4. Response of “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model on Drugs Used to Reversed Symptoms of Schizophrenia

A study showed that a drug (lamotrigine) was able to reverse hyperactivity caused by PCP-SI on rats placed in a novel arena [47]. Lamotrigine achieves this by reducing excitability in the striatal neurons which cause the inhibition of pre-synaptic voltage-gated sodium channels which reduce glutamate release [60,61]. Lamotrigine at a dose of (10 mg/kg i.p) was able to reverse the PCP-SI induced impairments in a novel object recognition test [47]. Furthermore, another study showed that clozapine was able to reverse locomotor hyperactivity and social recognition impairment caused by PCP-SI [50].

5. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Directions

In conclusion, most studies showed that the “double hit” (post-weaning social isolation and NMDA receptor antagonist) model is robust and capable of inducing a wider spectrum of more severe cognitive impairments and positive symptoms of schizophrenia. The “double hit” model has also proven to be a robust and reliable developmental model of schizophrenia. Different drugs (lamotrigine and clozapine) were able to reverse different impairments that were caused by the “double hit” model; this showed the predictive validity of this model and its potential as a translational model. More research is needed to investigate the effect of the “double hit” model on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Finally, more research needed to investigate the effect of this “double hit” model on epigenetic markers. According to our knowledge, this is the first study to review the “double hit” models of schizophrenia; this review will contribute positively to the development of effective animal models of schizophrenia that will be able to produce all symptoms of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, there are limitations to our study. We only considered studies on the “double hit” in rodent models of schizophrenia; we excluded other animal and human subjects. There is a possibility that we might have missed some papers because of how specific our search strategy was. The study only focused on the post-weaning social isolation and NMDA receptor antagonist “double hit” model of schizophrenia; there are many possible “double hit” models of schizophrenia that could provide valuable data. Choosing the NMDA receptor antagonist in our “double hit” model meant our paper was more focused on the glutamate neurotransmitter; there are other neurotransmitters that are involved in schizophrenia. Given the limitations of the current study, future study is needed to broaden the spectrum and cover both animal models and human subjects of the available “double hit” studies of schizophrenia. Another study is needed that will cover all “double hit” models, not only postweaning social isolation and the NMDA receptor antagonist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization K.B.S.; Methodology K.B.S., M.L. and M.V.M.; Software K.B.S.; Validation K.B.S., M.L. and M.V.M.; Formal Analysis K.B.S., M.L. and M.V.M.; Investigation K.B.S.; Data Curation K.B.S., M.L. and M.V.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation K.B.S.; Writing—Review and Editing M.L. and M.V.M.; Visualization K.B.S., M.L. and M.V.M.; Supervision M.L. and M.V.M.; Project Administration K.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [National Research Foundation] grant number [141325], and [University of KwaZulu-Natal college of health sciences scholarship] grant number [210507028].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to [University of KwaZulu-Natal does not review systematic review studies].

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Included studies in the systematic review were obtained from [PubMed and Ebscohost].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McGrath, J.; Saha, S.; Chant, D.; Welham, J. Schizophrenia: A Concise Overview of Incidence, Prevalence, and Mortality. Epidemiol. Rev. 2008, 30, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Crow, T.J. Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: More than one disease process? BMJ 1980, 280, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Andreasen, N. Symptoms, signs, and diagnosis of schizophrenia. Lancet 1995, 346, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bowie, C.R.; Harvey, P.D. Cognition in Schizophrenia: Impairments, Determinants, and Functional Importance. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 28, 613–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pratt, J.; Winchester, C.; Dawson, N.; Morris, B. Advancing schizophrenia drug discovery: Optimizing rodent models to bridge the translational gap. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 560–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jones, C.A.; Watson, D.J.G.; Fone, K. Animal models of schizophrenia. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1162–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McGrath, J.J. Variations in the Incidence of Schizophrenia: Data Versus Dogma. Schizophr. Bull. 2005, 32, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kahn, R.S.; Sommer, I.E. The neurobiology and treatment of first-episode schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 20, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, A.; Wood, S.; Nelson, B.; Brewer, W.; Spiliotacopoulos, D.; Bruxner, A.; Broussard, C.; Pantelis, C.; Yung, A. Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 2011, 132, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kahn, R.S.; Fleischhacker, W.W.; Boter, H.; Davidson, M.; Vergouwe, Y.; Keet, I.P.; Gheorghe, M.D.; Rybakowski, J.K.; Galderisi, S.; Libiger, J.; et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: An open randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2008, 371, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robinson, D. First-Episode Schizophrenia. CNS Spectr. 2010, 15, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Singh, S.P.; Singh, V. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Adjunctive NMDA Receptor Modulators in Chronic Schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 2011, 25, 859–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Heresco-Levy, U.; Javitt, D.C. Comparative effects of glycine and d-cycloserine on persistent negative symptoms in schizophrenia: A retrospective analysis. Schizophr. Res. 2004, 66, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brown, K.J.; Grunberg, N.E. Effects of housing on male and female rats: Crowding stresses males but calms females. Physiol. Behav. 1995, 58, 1085–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arakawa, H. Age dependent effects of space limitation and social tension on open-field behavior in male rats. Physiol. Behav. 2005, 84, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lapiz, M.D.; Fulford, A.; Muchimapura, S.; Mason, R.; Parker, T.; Marsden, C.A. Influence of postweaning social isolation in the rat on brain development, conditioned behaviour and neurotransmission. Ross. Fiziol. Zh. Im. I M Sechenova 2001, 87, 730–751. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fone, K.C.F.; Porkess, M.V. Behavioural and neurochemical effects of post-weaning social isolation in rodents—Relevance to developmental neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008, 32, 1087–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Valzelli, L. The “isolation syndrome” in mice. Psychopharmacology 1973, 31, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Einon, D.F.; Morgan, M.J. A critical period for social isolation in the rat. Dev. Psychobiol. 1977, 10, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heidbreder, C.; Weiss, I.; Domeney, A.; Pryce, C.; Homberg, J.; Hedou, G.; Feldon, J.; Moran, M.; Nelson, P. Behavioral, neurochemical and endocrinological characterization of the early social isolation syndrome. Neuroscience 2000, 100, 749–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weiss, I.C.; Pryce, C.R.; Jongen-Rêlo, A.L.; Nanz-Bahr, N.I.; Feldon, J. Effect of social isolation on stress-related behavioural and neuroendocrine state in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 2004, 152, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marsden, C.A.; King, M.V.; Fone, K.C. Influence of social isolation in the rat on serotonergic function and memory—Relevance to models of schizophrenia and the role of 5-HT6 receptors. Neuropharmacology 2011, 61, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Silva-Gómez, A.B.; Rojas, D.; Juárez, I.; Flores, G. Decreased dendritic spine density on prefrontal cortical and hippocampal pyramidal neurons in postweaning social isolation rats. Brain Res. 2003, 983, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Del Arco, A.; Zhu, S.; Terasmaa, A.; Mohammed, A.H.; Fuxe, K. Hyperactivity to novelty induced by social isolation is not correlated with changes in D2 receptor function and binding in striatum. Psychopharmacology 2003, 171, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Weiss, I.C.; Feldon, J.; Domeney, A.M. Isolation rearing-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition: Further evidence for fragility of the response. Behav. Pharmacol. 1999, 10, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Olney, J.W.; Farber, N.B. Glutamate Receptor Dysfunction and Schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1995, 52, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, G.; Coyle, J.T.; Carlsson, A.; Waters, N.; Holm-Waters, S.; Tedroff, J.; Nilsson, M.; Carlsson, M.L.; Lewis, D.A.; Levitt, P.; et al. Glutamatergic Mechanisms in Schizophrenia. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coyle, J.T.; Tsai, G.; Goff, D. Converging Evidence of NMDA Receptor Hypofunction in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 1003, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martinez, Z.; Ellison, G.D.; Geyer, M.A.; Swerdlow, N.R. Effects of Sustained Phencyclidine Exposure on Sensorimotor Gating of Startle in Rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, 21, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rung, J.P.; Carlsson, A.; Markinhuhta, K.R.; Carlsson, M.L. (+)-MK-801 induced social withdrawal in rats; a model for negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 29, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdul-Monim, Z.; Neill, J.C.; Reynolds, G.P. Sub-chronic psychotomimetic phencyclidine induces deficits in reversal learning and alterations in parvalbumin-immunoreactive expression in the rat. J. Psychopharmacol. 2007, 21, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beninger, R.J.; Forsyth, J.K.; Van Adel, M.; Reynolds, J.N.; Boegman, R.J.; Jhamandas, K. Subchronic MK-801 behavioural deficits in rats: Partial reversal by the novel nitrate GT 1061. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009, 91, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Castillo-Gómez, E.; Pérez-Rando, M.; Bellés, M.; Gilabert-Juan, J.; Llorens, J.V.; Carceller, H.; Bueno-Fernández, C.; García-Mompó, C.; Ripoll-Martínez, B.; Curto, Y.; et al. Early Social Isolation Stress and Perinatal NMDA Receptor Antagonist Treatment Induce Changes in the Structure and Neurochemistry of Inhibitory Neurons of the Adult Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex. Eneuro 2017, 4, ENEURO.0034-17.2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, W.; Wang, X.; Hong, W.; Wang, D.; Chen, X. Establishment of a schizophrenic animal model through chronic administration of MK-801 in infancy and social isolation in childhood. Infant Behav. Dev. 2017, 46, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garcia-Mompo, C.; Curto, Y.; Carceller, H.; Gilabert-Juan, J.; Rodriguez-Flores, E.; Guirado, R.; Nacher, J. Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol treatment during adolescence and alterations in the inhibitory networks of the adult prefrontal cortex in mice subjected to perinatal NMDA receptor antagonist injection and to postweaning social isolation. Transl. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hooijmans, C.R.; Rovers, M.M.; de Vries, R.B.M.; Leenaars, M.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.; Langendam, M.W. SYRCLE’s Risk of Bias Tool for Animal Studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tuboly, G.; Benedek, G.; Horvath, G. Selective disturbance of pain sensitivity after social isolation. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 96, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ashby, D.M.; Habib, D.; Dringenberg, H.C.; Reynolds, J.N.; Beninger, R.J. Subchronic MK-801 treatment and post-weaning social isolation in rats: Differential effects on locomotor activity and hippocampal long-term potentiation. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 212, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Simpson, S.M.; Menard, J.L.; Reynolds, J.N.; Beninger, R.J. Post-weaning social isolation increases activity in a novel environment but decreases defensive burying and subchronic MK-801 enhances the activity but not the burying effect in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2010, 95, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hickey, A.J.; Reynolds, J.N.; Beninger, R.J. Post-weaning social isolation and subchronic NMDA glutamate receptor blockade: Effects on locomotor activity and GABA signaling in the rat suggest independent mechanisms. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012, 101, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Simpson, S.M.; Hickey, A.J.; Baker, G.B.; Reynolds, J.N.; Beninger, R.J. The antidepressant phenelzine enhances memory in the double Y-maze and increases GABA levels in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012, 102, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hawken, E.R.; Delva, N.J.; Beninger, R.J. Increased Drinking following Social Isolation Rearing: Implications for Polydipsia Associated with Schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Inta, D.; Renz, P.; Lima-Ojeda, J.M.; Dormann, C.; Gass, P. Postweaning social isolation exacerbates neurotoxic effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in rats. J. Neural Transm. 2013, 120, 1605–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Petrovszki, Z.; Adam, G.; Tuboly, G.; Kekesi, G.; Benedek, G.; Keri, S.; Horvath, G. Characterization of gene–environment interactions by behavioral profiling of selectively bred rats: The effect of NMDA receptor inhibition and social isolation. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 240, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gaskin, P.L.; Alexander, S.P.; Fone, K.C. Neonatal phencyclidine administration and post-weaning social isolation as a dual-hit model of ‘schizophrenia-like’ behaviour in the rat. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gaskin, P.L.; Toledo-Rodriguez, M.; Alexander, S.P.; Fone, K.C. Down-Regulation of Hippocampal Genes Regulating Dopaminergic, GABAergic, and Glutamatergic Function Following Combined Neonatal Phencyclidine and Post-Weaning Social Isolation of Rats as a Neurodevelopmental Model for Schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016, 19, pyw062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, Z.-M.; Ding, Y.; Jia, H.-X.; Li, L. Different effects of isolation-rearing and neonatal MK-801 treatment on attentional modulations of prepulse inhibition of startle in rats. Psychopharmacology 2016, 233, 3089–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shortall, S.E.; Brown, A.M.; Newton-Mann, E.; Dawe-Lane, E.; Evans, C.; Fowler, M.; King, M.V. Calbindin Deficits May Underlie Dissociable Effects of 5-HT6 and mGlu7 Antagonists on Glutamate and Cognition in a Dual-Hit Neurodevelopmental Model for Schizophrenia. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 57, 3439–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hamieh, A.M.; Babin, D.; Sablé, E.; Hernier, A.M.; Castagné, V. Neonatal phencyclidine and social isolation in the rat: Effects of clozapine on locomotor activity, social recognition, prepulse inhibition, and executive functions deficits. Psychopharmacology 2020, 238, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klimczak, P.; Rizzo, A.; Castillo-Gómez, E.; Perez-Rando, M.; Gramuntell, Y.; Beltran, M.; Nacher, J. Parvalbumin Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets in the Hippocampus and Retrosplenial Cortex of Adult Male Mice After Early Social Isolation Stress and Perinatal NMDA Receptor Antagonist Treatment. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2021, 13, 733989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Aleman, A.; Kahn, R.S.; Selten, J.-P. Sex Differences in the Risk of Schizophrenia: Evidence from meta-analysis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2003, 60, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. McGrath, J.; Saha, S.; Welham, J.; El Saadi, O.; MacCauley, C.; Chant, D. A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: The distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology. BMC Med. 2004, 2, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bryda, E.C. The Mighty Mouse: The impact of rodents on advances in biomedical research. Mo. Med. 2013, 110, 207–211. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rowland, L.M. Subanesthetic ketamine: How it alters physiology and behavior in humans. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2005, 76, C52–C58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Frohlich, J.; Van Horn, J.D. Reviewing the ketamine model for schizophrenia. J. Psychopharmacol. 2013, 28, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Powell, S.; Geyer, M.; Preece, M.; Pitcher, L.; Reynolds, G.; Swerdlow, N. Dopamine depletion of the nucleus accumbens reverses isolation-induced deficits in prepulse inhibition in rats. Neuroscience 2003, 119, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rajagopal, L.; Massey, B.; Huang, M.; Oyamada, Y.; Meltzer, H. The Novel Object Recognition Test in Rodents in Relation to Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 5104–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Olney, J.W.; Labruyere, J.; Price, M.T. Pathological Changes Induced in Cerebrocortical Neurons by Phencyclidine and Related Drugs. Science 1989, 244, 1360–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Leach, M.; Baxter, M.G.; Critchley, M.A.E. Neurochemical and Behavioral Aspects of Lamotrigine. Epilepsia 1991, 32, S4–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Calabresi, P.; Centonze, D.; Marfia, G.A.; Pisani, A.; Bernardi, G. An in vitro electrophysiological study on the effects of phenytoin, lamotrigine and gabapentin on striatal neurons. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Shows the risk of bias for all selected articles.
Table 1. Shows the risk of bias for all selected articles.
StudiesSelection BiasPerformance BiasDetection BiasAttrition BiasReporting BiasOtherJudgement/Risk of Bias
Was the Allocation Sequence Adequately Generated and
Applied?		Were the Groups Similar at Baseline or Were They Adjusted for Confounders in the Analysis?Was the Allocation Adequately Concealed?Were the Animals Randomly Housed during the Experiment?Were the Caregivers and/or
Investigators Blinded from
Knowledge of Which Intervention
Each Animal Received during
the Experiment?		Were Animals Selected at Random for Outcome Assessment?Was the Outcome Assessor Blinded?Were Incomplete Outcome Data Adequately Addressed?Are Reports of the Study Free
of Selective Outcome Reporting?		Was the Study Apparently Free of Other Problems That Could Result in High Risk of Bias?
[38]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[39]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[40]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[41]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[42]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[43]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[44]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[45]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[46]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[47]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[48]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesLow
[33]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[34]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[35]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[49]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[50]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
[51]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
“Yes” means low risk of bias, “No” means high risk of bias, “Low” is a judgement meaning low risk of bias for the paper.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics for all included studies.
Table 2. Characteristics for all included studies.
StudyLocation of the StudyYear of PublicationSpeciesSexNMDA Receptor Antagonist, Dosage, Period of Injection, Type of InjectionCommencement of Social Isolation, Period of Social IsolationResearch Groups per StudyOutcome of the “Double Hit” Model
[41]Canada2012Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, 0.5 mg/kg, (PND 56–62) 2 times daily for
7 days, i.p. injection		From PND21-PND78GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MK.Combined post-weaning social isolation and subchronic MK801 treatment did not produce additive or synergistic effects on locomotor behaviour or Gaba signalling, but rather induce differential effects on GABAa receptor binding.
[44]Germany2013Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, (2 mg/kg) one injection, on PND64, i.p. injectionOn PD21 (weaning age corresponding to pre-adolescence), rats were housed either individually or in groups of three in cages for a 6-week period from PND21 to PND63GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MKJuvenile rats exposed to chronic isolation had increased MK801-triggered expression of heat shock protein 70, a marker of neuronal injury, in the retrosplenial cortex. This suggests an additive effect of juvenile stress and NMDA receptor blockade, with possible relevance for schizophrenia.
[42]Canada2012Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, 0.5 mg/kg,
(PND56-PND62) was injected twice daily, i.p. injection.		On PND21-PND73 animals were socially isolated and rats remained in their assigned housing for the
duration of the experiment.		GH + Sal + Sal, GH + MK + Sal, SI + Sal + Sal, SI + MK + Sal, GH + Sal + PLZ, GH + MK + PLZ, SI + Sal + PLZ, and SI + MK + PLZThe combination of social isolation and subchronic MK801 did not produce greater behavioural changes than either treatment alone.
[47]United Kingdom2016Lister-hooded ratMalePCP, 10 mg/kg on post-natal days (PND7, PND9, and PND11), s.c. injectionStarted on PND 23 till the end of the studyV + GH + V, V + GH + L15, PCP + SI + V, PCP + SI + L10, and PCP + SI + L15Acute lamotrigine (10–15 mg/kg i.p.) reversed the hyperactivity and novel object recognition impairment induced by “double hit” model (PCP-SI) but had no effect on the prepulse inhibition deficit.
[35]Spain2020GIN miceMaleMK801, 1 mg/kg on PND 7 pups received one injection, i.p. injectionPND21 till the end of the study-PND133CTRL + V, CTRL + THC, (SI + MK) + V, and (SI + MK) + THCWe found that “double hit” had reductions in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI), GAD67 expression and cingulate 1 cortex volume.
[45]Hungary2013Wister ratBoth male and femaleKetamine, 30 mg/kg 5 times/week, 15 injections in total) from PND35-PND56 of age, i.p. injectionAfter weaning at 3 weeks of age (PND21–23 days), Rats were housed individually for 28 days (between 4 and 7 weeks of age)NaNo, NaTr, SelNo, and SelTrSelective breeding after juvenile isolation and ketamine treatment produces several signs which resemble those found in schizophrenia.
[39]Canada2010Sprague Dawley ratMale MK801, 0.5 mg/kg, (PND56-PND62) 2 × day for seven days, i.p. injection.Social isolation started at postnatal day PND21 until PND56GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI and MKThe lack of additive or synergistic effects in the
“double hit model” suggests that combining isolation and subchronic MK801 treatment does not necessarily produce greater behavioural or physiological dysfunction than that seen with either treatment alone.
[50]France2020Wister ratMale PCP (10 mg/kg) on (PND7, PND9, and PND11), s.c. injectionAt the weaning day (PND 21), male rat pups were housed individually until the end of the studyV + GH + V, PCP + SI + V, and PCP + SI + CloThe PCP-SI model presents with enduring and robust deficits (hyperactivity and social recognition impairment) associated with positive symptoms and cognitive/social deficits of schizophrenia, respectively. These deficits are normalized by chronic treatment with clozapine, thereby confirming the predictive validity of this animal model.
[38]Hungary2009Wister ratMaleKetamine, 30 mg/kg, (PND28-PND42) one injection per day, i.p. injectionWistar rats after weaning (PND21–PND23 days old) were either housed individually or grouped for 21 days.GH + Sal, GH + Ket, SI + Sal, and SI + Ket Since both social isolation and NMDA treatment are well-known animal models of schizophrenia, our results showed that juvenile isolation but not ketamine administration can stimulate hypoalgesia associated with this disease.
[34]China2017Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg in PND7-PND21, s.c. injectionAt PND21, rats were social isolated for four weeks (on PND49)GH + Sal, SI + Sal, GH + MK0.1, SI + MK0.1, GH + MK0.3, SI + MK0.3, GH + MK0.5, and SI + MK0.5Administration of MK801 and social isolation are two independent factors on the neurodevelopmental defects. Combining social isolation and subchronic MK801 treatment does not necessarily produce greater behavioural or physiological dysfunction than that seen with either treatment alone.
[40]Canada2010Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, 0.5 mg/kg, injected twice per day for 7 days from PND56-PND62, i.p. injection.Rats were obtained at weaning (PND21); they were socially isolated, or group housed according to their randomly assigned housing groups and remained in their assigned groups for the duration of the experiment.GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MKLocomotor activity was increased in social isolated rats. This activity was exacerbated in MK801-SI rats suggesting a possible decrease in hippocampal and/or prefrontal cortex GABA function.
[46]United Kingdom2014Lister hooded ratMalePCP, 10 mg/kg, on post-natal day (PND7, PND9, and PND11), s.c. injectionRats were socially isolated on PND23, and animals remain isolated for 6 weeks.GH + CTRL, GH + PCP, SI + CTRL, and SI + PCPNeonatal PCP and social isolation both produced behavioural deficits in adult rats resulting in severe cognitive impairment (visual recognition memory impairment). This provided a comprehensive preclinical model that can be used to determine the neurobiological aetiology of schizophrenia than either treatment alone.
[43]Canada2013Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801 0.5 mg/kg, (PND62-PND68) twice daily for 7 days, i.p. injectionRats reared in groups or in isolation beginning at PND21.GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MKResults showed that polydipsia is a schizophrenia-like behavioural effect caused by social isolation. The “double hit” model did not yield a more pronounced polydipsia effect than each treatment alone.
[49]United Kingdom2020Lister hooded ratMalePCP-HCL, 10 mg/kg on (PND 7, PND9, and PND11), s.c. injectionAnimals were socially isolated on PND21-PND63.GH + V, GH + PCP, SI + V, and SI + PCPGlutamate release was reduced in a “double hit” model; this reduced interneuron firing and caused impairment in the novel object discrimination task.
[48]China2016Sprague Dawley ratMaleMK801, 0.2 mg/kg, (PND7-PND10), i.p. injectedAnimals were socially isolated on PND21 and remained isolated for 8 weeks.GH + Sal, GH + MK, and SI + SalBoth socially reared rats with neonatal exposure to the
NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 and isolation-reared rats
exhibited augmented startle responses.
[33]Spain2017Transgenic strain miceMaleMK801, 1 mg/kg on PND7, once off/one injection, i.p. injectionRats were socially isolated on PND21 and remained isolated for 10 weeks.GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MKThe “double hit” model showed that the change in E/I balance in the key brain regions as one of the underlying causes of schizophrenia.
[51]Spain2021FVB miceMaleMK801, 1 mg/kg on PND7, once off/one injection, i.p. injectionRats were socially isolated on PND21 and remained isolated for 10 weeks.GH + Sal, GH + MK, SI + Sal, and SI + MKThe “double hit” model showed a significant decrease in the number of PV+ interneurons, perineuronal nets (PNNs), and PNNs+PV+ cells when compared to control grouped mice.
Abbreviations: SI (social isolation), GH (group housed), MK (MK801), Sal (saline), Plz (phenelzine), L (lamotrigine), PCP (phencyclidine), CTRL (control), V (vehicle), THC (9-tetrahydrocannabinol), NaNo (naïve rats without treatment), NaTr (naïve rats with post-weaning social isolation and ketamine treatment), SelNo (selectively bred animals without any treatment), SelTr (selectively bred rats with both post-weaning social isolation and ketamine treatment), Clo (clozapine), Ket (ketamine), i.p. (intraperitoneal), s.c. (subcutaneous), PND (postnatal day).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shangase, K.B.; Luvuno, M.; Mabandla, M.V. Investigating the Robustness of a Rodent “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as an Animal Model for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060848

AMA Style

Shangase KB, Luvuno M, Mabandla MV. Investigating the Robustness of a Rodent “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as an Animal Model for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(6):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shangase, Khanyiso Bright, Mluleki Luvuno, and Musa V. Mabandla. 2023. "Investigating the Robustness of a Rodent “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as an Animal Model for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review" Brain Sciences 13, no. 6: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060848

APA Style

Shangase, K. B., Luvuno, M., & Mabandla, M. V. (2023). Investigating the Robustness of a Rodent “Double Hit” (Post-Weaning Social Isolation and NMDA Receptor Antagonist) Model as an Animal Model for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences, 13(6), 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop