Next Article in Journal
A Context Aware Smart Classroom Architecture for Smart Campuses
Previous Article in Journal
In-Situ Observation of Adhesion Behavior During Ultrasonic Al Ribbon Bonding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Dynamic Cone Angle on the Atomization Performance of a Piezoceramic Vibrating Mesh Atomizer

1
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering& Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(9), 1836; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091836
Submission received: 23 March 2019 / Revised: 28 April 2019 / Accepted: 30 April 2019 / Published: 3 May 2019

Abstract

:
In this paper, we find that the dynamic cone angle of a piezoceramic atomizer is linked to periodic changes in the volume of the micro-cone hole of the atomizer, and such changes affect atomization performance. Firstly, we explained the theory of the dynamic cone angle inside the vibrating mesh atomizer. Then, we analyzed the flow status of liquid in the micro-cone hole, and the one-way flow Rof the liquid is caused by the difference of diffuser and nozzle flow resistance. The volume change of the micro-cone hole and the liquid chamber can produce atomization. Furthermore, we developed the experiment to measure the atomization rate, atomization height, and the diameter of the atomized particles. The experiments reveal that the atomization rate and height are much larger when the vibrating mesh atomizer is working in the forward path than in the reverse one. The atomization rate and atomization height increase as the working voltage increases. Meanwhile, with increasing driving voltage to the piezoceramic actuator, the atomization particle size decrease and the atomized particle size distribution is more concentrated. Finally, the size of the micro-cone hole was measured using a microscope with different direct current (DC) voltages, further demonstrating the existence of the dynamic cone angle.

1. Introduction

The past century has been characterized by rapid advances in materials development, especially in functional materials, such as piezoceramic materials. Nowadays, on one hand, piezoceramic materials have found a wide spectrum of commercial applications [1,2], such as ultrasonic measurement [3,4,5], vibration sensing and control [6,7,8], force sensing [9,10], pumping and dosing [11,12,13], ultrasonic cleaner, ultrasonic welding, energy harvesting [14,15] and imaging [16], among others. On the other hand, piezoceramic materials and devices are still being actively researched to achieve better performance with lower cost and less environmental impact [17,18,19].
One of the actively researched piezoceramic devices is the atomizer, which utilizes a piezoceramic actuator to convert liquid to atomized particles through high frequency ultrasonic vibration; it can cause ultrafine droplet atomization. Ultrafine droplet atomization is widely applied in combustion with liquid fuel [20], inhalation therapy [21,22,23], printed circuits [24], three-dimensional (3D) prototyping [25], precise surface coating [26,27], spray drying [28], spray cooling [29,30], and inkjet printing [31], among other fields. Ultrafine droplet atomization has high important application potential, and scholars began to focus on atomization devices.
Kuttruff first provided a detailed explanation of the actuating principle of a surface acoustic wave atomizer [32]. Berggrend et al. designed an extrusion-type piezoceramic ultrasonic atomizer that produced droplets with an average diameter of 27 μm [33]. The working mechanism of this type of atomizer is to release energy to the entire liquid system to break the surface tension of the liquid and allow the droplets to escape from the surface for atomization and ejection. The atomization is formed at the surface of the liquid. However, the energy is applied to the entire liquid system.
Heij et al. proposed a stationary vibrating mesh atomizer driven by piezoelectricity to improve energy use, minimize the droplet size range and strengthen control over the atomization process [34]. To further minimize the droplet size range, Pan et al. designed a new type of stationary micro-cone hole driven by piezoelectricity [35]. In this type of atomizer, the pressure inside the liquid chamber is modulated by the vibration of a piezoelectric vibrator, and the liquid is ejected from the micro-jet hole when the pressure inside the liquid chamber is sufficiently large, resulting in atomization. In designing this type of atomizer, it is necessary to add an atomizer chamber with variable volume. The structure of this type of atomizer is complex, which limits the miniaturization of the atomizer.
In this research, the micro-cone hole is machined within the plate metals of the vibrating mesh atomizer. There is no liquid chamber with variable volume in the process of atomization, the structure of the atomizer is simplified, and the atomization process can be controlled. Maehara et al. proposed the atomizer with this structure [36,37]. Lu et al. designed an efficient cooling device that used a vibrating mesh atomizer [38,39]. This type of atomizer can effectively improve energy use and minimize the droplet size range. It also has the advantages of portability and straightforward integration, resulting in a revolutionary influence on combustion with liquid fuel [40,41].
We previously determined that the micro-cone hole of the vibrating micro-porous atomizer has an important influence on the atomization effect, particularly the dynamic change of the cone angle of the atomizer under the working conditions. Therefore, this study was designed to verify the dynamic change of the micro-cone angle and its effect on the atomization effect of the vibrating mesh atomizer.

2. Structure of the Atomizer and Dynamic Cone Angle

2.1. Structure of the Atomizer

Figure 1a shows a schematic of a vibrating mesh atomizer structure. Because the micro-cone hole is machined in the middle of the disperser, piezoelectric (PZT) need to be machined into a circular ring. The PZT ring is bonded tightly to the disperser, and then the inverse piezoelectric effect of the PZT is used to drive the disperser which results in atomization and ejection. Lu reviewed the operation of this type of atomizer: the liquid is pinched off as droplets pass through the cone nozzle during forward vibration and then adheres to the orifice by capillary force during backward vibration, as shown in Figure 1b,c. At this point, the micro-cone hole is in the nozzle mode, and the liquid flows from the flared (the larger diameter of the micro-cone hole) side to the tapered side (the smaller diameter of the micro-cone hole). According to Lu’s explanation, it was noted that if the atomization test is repeated when the atomizer shown in Figure 1a is reversed by 180°, with the flared side (originally immersed in the liquid) exposed to the air, and the tapered side (originally exposed to the air) immersed in the liquid, then the same atomization rate will be obtained. At this point, the micro-cone hole is in the diffuser mode, and it should obtain the same atomization rate as it did in nozzle mode when the liquid flows from the tapered side (the smaller diameter of the micro-cone hole) to the flared (the larger diameter of the micro-cone hole) side.

2.2. Structure of the Ultrasonic Atomizer and Micro-Cone Hole

Figure 2a shows the structure and parameters of atomizer. The grey part in Figure 3 is the PZT, and the yellow part is the disperser. The thickness of the PZT is 0.63 mm; the external and internal diameters of the PZT rings are 15.96 mm and 7.69 mm, respectively. The thickness of the dispenser is 50 μm, and the diameter of the dispenser is 15.96 mm. The large diameter and the small diameter of the cone hole are 81.81 μm and 10.77 μm, respectively. There are about 400 micro-cone holes processed on the middle bulge of an atomizing film via laser technology. There are some errors in laser processing, so in this study, it has been simplified to a micro-cone hole.
Figure 2b,c respectively show the front view and back view of the atomizing film. During atomization, the surface in Figure 2c comes into contact with the liquid chamber, while the surface in Figure 2b comes into contact with the external environment.
Figure 2d shows the image of a micro-tapered aperture taken with an environmental scanning electron microscope, in which the red circle marks the liquid outlet and the green circle marks the liquid inlet. It can be observed that this is a typical micron-sized tapered flow tube that consists of three micro-tapered apertures connected in series.

2.3. The Dynamic Changes of the Micro Apertures

Figure 3 shows the illustrative diagram of the dynamic cone angle. We have analyzed the theory of the dynamic cone angle [42,43].
This cycle continues as long as the PZT ring continues to deliver the required stimulation. A dynamic cone tube with diffuser and nozzle is formed by the micro-cone hole inside the piezoelectric vibrator during vibration. In this study, the dynamic change of the cone angle of the conical tube is called the dynamic cone angle.

3. Theoretical Analysis

3.1. Analysis of the Flow of Liquids

Under the excitation of alternating current AC signal, PZT will produce vibration, which will drive the disperser vibration. The effects of gravity on the fluid are assumed to be negligible. In this case, the pressure in the aperture varies with volume. When the metal sheet is compressed, the volume of the micro-cone hole decreases and the liquid pressure increases in turn; however, when the metal sheet is stretched, the volume of the micro-cone hole increases and the liquid pressure decreases in turn.
The fluid in the micro-cone hole has two external environments: one is the liquid chamber, and the other is the atmosphere. During atomization, the small side of the micro-cone hole is in contact with the atmosphere, and the other side is in contact with the liquid. When the volume on the upper side decreases, the cone angle increases, and the pressure in the upper side of the micro-cone hole also increases. Liquid flows from regions of high pressure to the regions of low pressure. One branch of fluid flows into the space below the neutral layer and fills the space where the volume in the micro-cone hole becomes larger, and the other part of the fluid extrudes into the outer space with lower pressure. The low pressure at the lower side causes the liquid to flow into that side, into a region where liquid is accumulated from flows from the upper side and from the liquid chamber. When the volume on the upper side increases, the cone angle decreases. The direction of the liquid flow will be opposite.

3.2. Analysis of the Flow Resistance

The vague phrases “one branch” and “the other branch” are used above because the fundamental flow constraints include not only the pressure generated by the volume changes of the aperture but also the inertial force and the capillary force. A slight volume change in the liquid chamber beneath the dispenser also causes both atomization and ejection directly. In the tapered aperture, the flow resistance in the diffuser element is different from the flow resistance in the nozzle element.
In a single cycle, the micro-cone hole acts as a nozzle/diffuser element. The difference between the two flow resistances determines the flow rates of “one branch” and “the other branch” described above and allows one-way flows from the flared (the larger diameter of the micro-cone hole) side to the tapered side (the smaller diameter of the micro-cone hole).
The atomizer uses AC voltage. Therefore, the angle of the micro-cone hole changes constantly. The flow resistance of the diffuser and nozzle also changes constantly. At a certain moment, ξ(t)Dd is the diffuser element loss coefficient, and ξ(t)Dn is the nozzle element loss coefficient.
Therefore, in one cycle, the average of the diffuser element loss coefficient is:
ξ D d ¯ = 1 T 0 T ξ ( t ) D d d t = 1 T i = 0 k ξ ( t ) D d Δ t i
where T is the length of one cycle.
Similarly, the average of the nozzle element loss coefficient is:
ξ D n ¯ = 1 T 0 T ξ ( t ) D n d t = 1 T i = 0 k ξ ( t ) D n Δ t i
where T is the length of one cycle.
Figure 4 shows the empirical curves of the cone angle, the diffuser loss coefficient ξSd, and the nozzle loss coefficient ξSn [44]. The flow resistance is also a function of the cone angle on a macroscopic level (only cone angles of more than 40° are discussed here). The flow resistance is higher in the diffuser element than in the nozzle element when the cone angle is more than approximately 30° [44]. The flow resistance increases as the angle increases.
Olsson [45] compared the results obtained from the numerical calculation for conical flows and those mentioned in reference [46] and found that the flow resistances in the nozzle/diffuser elements at the micro-scale are similar to those at the macro-scale. Therefore, in this study, the flow resistances in the nozzle/diffuser elements at the micro-cone hole can use the empirical curves in Figure 4. From this figure, the diffuser/nozzle loss factors are as follows: ξSn = 0.49, ξSd = 0.62.

3.3. Atomization Rate

In a previous study [42], it was found that when the piezoelectric vibrator moves from the equilibrium position to the extreme position, the volume of the liquid chamber changes is follows:
Δ V V S = 2 π 0 R w 0 ( 1 r 2 R 2 ) r d r = π w 0 R 2 2
where ΔVVS is the volume of the liquid chamber changes.
The volume of the cone apertures changes is follows [42]:
Δ V V D = Ω [ 2 z ( f y y + f x x + f y 2 f x x 2 f x f y f x y + f x 2 f y y ) m 1 ] d V
where ΔVVD is the volume of the cone apertures changes.
Zhang et al. provided an equation for the net volume flow rate when the cone hole is in a steady state [44]:
q V Δ V f ξ N d ξ N n 2 + ξ N d + ξ N n
where ΔV is the volume variation of the liquid chamber, f is the vibrational frequency, ξNd is the diffuser element loss coefficient, and ξNn is the nozzle element loss coefficient.
Therefore, the flow rate caused by the change of the volume of the liquid cavity is:
q V S Δ V S f ξ ¯ D d ξ ¯ D n 2 + ξ ¯ D d + ξ ¯ D n
where ΔVS is the volume variation caused by the piezoelectric vibrator.
Similarly, the flow rate caused by the change of the volume of the micro-cone hole is:
q V D Δ V D f ξ ¯ D d ξ ¯ D n 2 + ξ ¯ D d + ξ ¯ D n
where ΔVD is the volume variation caused by the micro-cone hole.
With the tapered side exposed to the air and the flared side immersed in the liquid, the overall volume flow of the dispenser is:
q = q v s + q v d = Δ V S f ξ ¯ D d ξ ¯ D n 2 + ξ ¯ D d + ξ ¯ D n + Δ V D f ξ ¯ D d ξ ¯ D n 2 + ξ ¯ D d + ξ ¯ D n = ( Δ V S + Δ V D ) f ξ ¯ D d ξ ¯ D n 2 + ξ ¯ D d + ξ ¯ D n
When the atomizer shown in Figure 1a is reversed by 180°, the flared side is exposed to the air, and the tapered side immersed in the liquid. The pumping effect of the micro-cone hole and liquid chamber can also cause atomization. However, in such a case, the flow resistance is higher in the diffuser element than in the nozzle element, and the atomization rate is much less than that it is in normal conditions.
Due to the difference of the diffuser flow resistance and the nozzle flow resistance, and the volume changes in the micro-tapered aperture and the liquid chamber, a pumping effect is produced, and the one-way flow of the liquid is caused by the pumping effect.

3.4. The Droplet Formation Process

Figure 5 shows the modeling of the droplet formation process in one cycle. It can be seen from the figure that when the pressure in the micro-cone hole is positive, the liquid in the cone hole flows outward to form a liquid column; when the pressure in the cone hole is negative, the liquid droplets will continue to flow outward for a period of time due to inertia; with the continuous negative pressure in the micro-cone hole, the liquid column begins to flow back into the hole, then the liquid begins to move along the inner wall of the cone hole to the hole, and the liquid part in the hole. Gradually fined and then fractured to form atomized droplets. It can be found from the figure that the outflow liquid flows outward at the center faster than the liquid near the outlet, so when the liquid at the outlet begins to move into the hole, the outermost liquid still keeps flowing outward, which makes the droplet appear as thinning neck near the outlet, thus creating conditions for liquid fracture.

4. Design of Experiments

In the experiment, we plan to measure atomization rate, atomization height and the particle size of the atomized particles. Atomization rate is the liquid quality of the atomizer per minute. Atomization height is the maximum height of the atomized droplets by hole injection. The particle size of the atomized particles is the mean diameter of the atomized particles. The liquid used in the experiment was water, which had a temperature of 20 °C and a kinematic viscosity of 1 × 10−3 Pa·s.
Figure 6 shows the photograph of measuring the vibration mode of the piezoelectric vibrator. The velocity and amplitude curves of the atomized tablets were obtained using a Polytech PSV-300F-B laser vibrometer. The resonance frequency was obtained from the curve, and the resonance point was determined. In addition, the atomization rate was measured at each resonance point at an operating voltage of 40 V.
In the previous experiment, we obtained the optimum operating frequency of the atomizer. To validate the effect of the micro-cone hole on atomization performance, the atomization rates and the atomization heights are measured at both the flared (forward direction) and tapered sides (reverse direction) with different working voltages at the optimum operating frequency. Figure 7 shows the measurement of the atomization rate and the atomization height. The atomization rate can be obtained by electronic weighing, and the atomization height can be directly investigated using a straight ruler.
To further validate the effect of the change of cone angle of on atomization performance, the particle size of the atomized particles was measured at different applied voltages at the optimum operating frequency. Figure 8 shows the measurement of the particle size of the atomized particles.
The relationship among the atomization rate, the atomization height, the particle size of the atomized particles and driving voltage is obtained from the above test. To establish the relationship between the cone angle and the driving voltage, different DC voltages were applied to the piezoceramics actuator, and the changes in the micro-cone hole were observed using microscopy. Figure 9 shows the method for measurement of the hole. The method for measuring the cone hole’s diameter is as follows: firstly, we used three points to plot the diameters of a circle (the circle is plotted according to the outermost of the hole). In the measurement, the localization of the three points is hand chosen. In order to avoid the influence of subjective factors on the measurement results, we chose three conspicuous points to plot the circle. We continued to search for these three points after the voltage changed, and used these three points to plot the diameters of a circle. Then, we obtain the diameter of the cone hole under different voltages. In the measurement, we let the tapered side of the dispenser face upward firstly, and use the above method to measure the tapered side diameter of the micro-cone hole under DC voltage (the DC voltages are −125 V, 0 V, 125 V, 250 V and 125 V, respectively), and record the results of the measurements for the five voltages. The change of the large aperture in the micro-cone hole can be measured by the same method. The thickness of the dispenser can be measured by vernier calipers, and the angle of the micro-cone hole can be obtained from the geometric relations.

5. Results and Discussion

Figure 10 shows the frequency sweep curves of the vibration velocity and amplitude, vibration modes of resonance points, deformation diagram of the piezoelectric oscillator and atomization rates at the resonance points. In this experiment, the flared end of the atomizer is attached to the water tank and is placed in contact with the fluid surface (i.e., in the forward direction).
In this experiment, no visible atomization was observed below a resonant frequency of 15.9 kHz.
As shown in Figure 10, the atomization rate increased gradually with resonance frequency and at the resonance frequency of 121.1 kHz, the atomization rate was maximized (2.805 mL/min). However, at the resonance frequency of 148.3 kHz, the atomization rate decreased significantly.
When the frequency increases (where ① refers to the increasing frequency trend), the dispenser deformation becomes more complex, which indicates that its rate of deformation curvature change and the rate of tapered aperture volume change both increase. Furthermore, the rate of liquid chamber volume change decreases (where ② refers to the decreasing rate of liquid chamber volume change trend). However, the atomization rates at the resonant frequencies generally increase incrementally. This finding contradicts the findings of previous discussions on the pumping effect caused by volume changes and the atomization generated under ultrasound conditions. No clear explanations are given in the literature [29,38,39].
When the rate of dispenser deformation curvature change increases (referring to larger changes in the dynamic cone angle) as shown in Figure 3, the dynamic cone angle pumping effect becomes stronger, and this results in an increase in the atomization rate. Therefore, the vibration and the elastic deformation of the dispenser allow the micro-dynamic cone angle to act as a pump. There are two possible reasons for the reduction of the atomization rate at the sixth-order resonance point. The first is that the overall displacement amplitude decreases at higher resonance modes and the rate of change also decreases. The second reason is that the flow velocity in the aperture increases with increasing frequency, and this leads to the increased flow resistance. Therefore, the dynamic cone angle plays an important role in the atomization.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 show that the atomization rate and atomization height measured in the forward direction are much higher than those measured in the reverse direction. This atomization rate and atomization height difference increases as the working voltage increases. As determined through the analysis above, the atomization of the vibrating mesh atomizer is caused by pressure atomization and dynamic cone angle atomization. The pressure atomization is caused by the change of the volume in the liquid chamber, and the dynamic cone angle atomization is caused by the change of the volume in the micro-cone hole. When the vibrating mesh atomizer is working in the forward configuration, the atomization rate is the sum of the pressure atomization and the dynamic cone angle atomization, as shown in Equation (8). Therefore, the atomization rate in the forward direction is much higher than in the reverse direction. The initial velocity of the atomized droplets is more rapid at the exit of the micro-cone hole when the atomization rate is larger. Therefore, the atomization height in the forward direction is much higher than in the reverse direction. The experiment shows that the micro-cone hole is integral to and influences the atomization behavior.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 show that at the same resonance frequency, with increasing driving voltage, the atomization rate and the atomization height gradually increase. When the driving frequency is unchanged, the vibration mode of the piezoelectric vibrator is also unchanged. With increasing driving voltage of the piezoelectric vibrator, the deformation of the piezoelectric vibrator amplitude is greater. Xu et al. proposed that the flow is driven by the actual displacement of the piezoelectric in a piezoelectric nozzle [47], and the liquid obtained more energy when the voltage increased. With increasing driving voltage of the piezoelectric vibrator, the deformation of the piezoelectric vibrator amplitude is greater, and the angle and change of the volume of the micro-cone hole increases. The difference of the average flow resistance in the forward and reverse directions increases with an increase in the angle of the micro-cone hole. With the increase of the displacement of the piezoelectric vibrator, the increase of volume of the micro-cone hole and the increase of the difference of the average flow resistance in the forward and reverse directions, the atomization rate and atomization height also increase.
Figure 13 and Figure 14 show that at the same resonance frequency, with increasing driving voltage, the atomization particle size decreases, the atomized particle size distribution is more concentrated, and droplet size range gradually decreases. When the driving frequency is unchanged, the vibration mode of the piezoelectric vibrator is also unchanged. With increasing driving voltage of the piezoelectric vibrator, the deformation of the piezoelectric vibrator amplitude is greater, and the angle and change of the volume of the micro-cone hole increases. As shown in Figure 3, the diameter of the tapered side with the micro-cone hole is smaller when the piezoelectric vibrator is in the lowest position. By analyzing the theory of the phenomenon of dynamic cone angle [42,43], the atomized droplets are found to eject from the micro-cone hole into the air when the piezoelectric vibrator reaches the lowest position. The diameter of the atomized particles is reduced by reducing the diameter of the tapered side with the micro-cone hole in this position. Simultaneously, the maximum diameter of the atomized droplets is reduced by reducing the diameter of the tapered side with the micro-cone hole. The speed of droplets leaving the micro-cone hole increases with the increase of voltage. The distance between the two separated droplets increases with the increase of speed. At this point, the probability of collision decreases, and the atomized particle size distribution is more concentrated. The experiment to characterize the atomization parameters at different driving voltages proves the presence of the dynamic cone angle, and the experiment establishes that the dynamic cone angle affects the atomization performance.
Figure 15 shows the results of measurement of the parameters of the micro-cone hole at different voltages along with schematics of the change. Figure 15a–e shows the results of five time measurements at different voltages. Figure 15 shows that the micro-cone hole changes constantly under diverse voltages.
Table 1 shows the measurement results of the micro-cone hole under different voltages. It can be seen from Table 1 that the angle of the micro-cone hole changed under different working voltages.
The angle of the micro-cone hole can be closely related to the voltage through microscope observation. The previous experiment showed that the atomization performance is affected by the driving voltage. Therefore, the atomization performance is closely related to the change of the angle of the micro-cone hole.
It is also important to note that in this experiment, the voltage applied is DC voltage, and in the actual work process, the voltage applied to the nebulizer will be AC voltage. The frequency of the applied alternating current is consistent with the resonant frequency of piezoelectric, thus producing resonance and augmenting the vibration of the piezoelectric vibrator. Thus, the actual deformation of the dispenser is much more complicated than that in the present experiment, and these resulting changes in the angle will also be larger than those in the experiment.

6. Conclusions

Liquid fuel can be atomized by piezoceramic atomizers, which will ensure that the combustion is more complete and thorough to reduce the pollution. Our research team studied the micro-cone hole atomizer. The main conclusions are summarized as follows:
The phenomenon of dynamic cone angle is analyzed in this study. Under micro-scale conditions, when an outside force or vibration is applied to the aperture, the resulting periodic elastic deformation allows the aperture to become smaller and then larger in a cyclical manner, which results in periodic changes in the aperture volume at the micro-scale level, with the change of the angle of the micro-cone hole increasing with increasing driving voltage.
The phenomenon of the dynamic cone angle inside the vibrating mesh atomizer is analyzed. Because of the difference between the diffuser flow resistance and nozzle flow resistance, the one-way flow of the liquid produced by the volume change of the micro-cone hole and the liquid chamber causes atomization.
The experiments reveal that the atomization rate and the atomization height are different when the vibrating mesh atomizer is working in the forward and reverse directions. The atomization rate and the atomization height measured in the forward direction are much higher than that measured in the reverse direction. The atomization rate and the atomization height increased with driving voltage, and the diameter of the atomized particles decreases with increased driving voltage.
The experiment shows that the micro-cone hole of the vibrating mesh atomizer has an important influence on the atomization effect, particularly the dynamic change of the cone angle of the atomizer under the working conditions.

Author Contributions

J.Z. and Q.Y. proposed the study; Q.Y. carried out experiments; J.Z., C.W, and Q.Y. analyzed the data; Q.Y. wrote the manuscript; J.Z. and C.W. modified the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51375227).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jaffe, B. Piezoelectric Ceramics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vijaya, M.S. Piezoelectric Materials and Devices: Applications in Engineering and Medical Sciences; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Raine, A.B.; Aslam, N.; Underwood, C.P.; Danaher, S. Development of an ultrasonic airflow measurement device for ducted air. Sensors 2015, 15, 10705–10722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, G.; Feng, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Song, G. Characterization of ultrasound energy diffusion due to small-size damage on an aluminum plate using piezoceramic transducers. Sensors 2017, 17, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gamarra-Diezma, J.L.; Miranda-Fuentes, A.; Llorens, J.; Cuenca, A.; Blanco-Roldán, G.L.; Rodríguez-Lizana, A. Testing accuracy of long-range ultrasonic sensors for olive tree canopy measurements. Sensors 2015, 15, 2902–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tinoco, H.; Cardona, C.; Peña, F.; Gomez, J.; Roldan-Restrepo, S.; Velasco-Mejia, M.; Barco, D. Evaluation of a Piezo-Actuated Sensor for Monitoring Elastic Variations of Its Support with Impedance-Based Measurements. Sensors 2019, 19, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Song, G.; Schmidt, S.P.; Agrawal, B.N. Active vibration suppression of a flexible structure using smart material and a modular control patch. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 2000, 214, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gu, H.; Song, G. Active vibration suppression of a flexible beam with piezoceramic patches using robust model reference control. Smart Mater. Struct. 2007, 16, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wang, L.; Xi, W. Development of a microforce sensor and its array platform for robotic cell microinjection force measurement. Sensors 2016, 16, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Hou, S.; Ou, J. Feasibility of SA–based concrete seismic stress monitoring for high-strength concrete. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 2428–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phan, H.T.; Dinh, T.X.; Bui, P.N.; Dau, V.T. Transient characteristics of a fluidic device for circulatory jet flow. Sensors 2018, 18, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J. Equivalent Circuit Modeling for a Valveless Piezoelectric Pump. Sensors 2018, 18, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fan, B.; Song, G.; Hussain, F. Simulation of a piezoelectrically actuated valveless micropump. Smart Mater. Struct. 2005, 14, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, M.G.; Jung, W.S.; Kang, C.Y.; Yoon, S.J. February. Recent progress on PZT based piezoelectric energy harvesting technologies. Actuators 2016, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ji, Q.; Parvasi, S.M.; Ho, S.C.M.; Franchek, M.; Song, G. Wireless energy harvesting using time reversal technique: An experimental study with numerical verification. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 2705–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Xiao, H.; Huo, L.; Song, G. A multi-delay-and-sum imaging algorithm for damage detection using piezoceramic transducers. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rödel, J.; Webber, K.G.; Dittmer, R.; Jo, W.; Kimura, M.; Damjanovic, D. Transferring lead-free piezoelectric ceramics into application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 1659–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reyes-Montero, A.; Ramos-Alvarez, P.; González, A.M.; López-Juárez, R.; Villafuerte-Castrejón, M.E. Dielectric and Impedance Analysis on the Electrical Response of Lead-Free Ba1−xCaxTi0.9Zr0.1O3 Ceramics at High Temperature Range. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, C.M.; Chen, K.H.; Lee, D.H.; Jong, F.C.; Chen, M.L.; Chang, J.K. Dielectric, Piezoelectric, and Vibration Properties of the LiF-Doped (Ba0.95Ca0.05)(Ti0.93Sn0.07)O3 Lead-Free Piezoceramic Sheets. Materials 2018, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Basaran, O.A. Small-scale free surface flows with breakup: Drop formation and emerging applications. AICHE J. 2002, 48, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Newman, S.P.; Clark, S.W. Therapeutic aerosols 1-physical and practical considerations. Thorax 1983, 38, 881–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heij, B.D.; Schoot, B.V.D.; Hu, B. Characterisation of a fL droplet generator for inhalation drug therapy. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2000, 85, 430–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Demer, L.M.; Ginger, D.S.; Park, S.J. Direct patterning of modified oligonucleotides on metals and insulators by dip-pen nanolithography. Science 2002, 296, 1836–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Forrest, S.R. The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 2004, 428, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heschel, M.; Mullenborn, M.; Bouwstra, S. Fabrication and characterization of truly 3-D diffuser/nozzle microstructures in silicon. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 1997, 6, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Choi, K.H.; Ali, J.; Na, K.H. Fabrication of graphenenanoflake/poly(4-vinylphenol) polymer nanocomposite thin film by electrohydrodynamic atomization and its application as flexible resistive switching device. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 2015, 475, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Memarzadeh, K.; Sharili, A.S.; Huang, J. Nanoparticulate zinc oxide as a coating material for orthopedic and dental implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2015, 103, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carnesanchez, A.; Imaz, I.; Canosarabia, M. A spray-drying strategy for synthesis of nanoscale metal–organic frameworks and their assembly into hollow superstructures. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lu, C.F.; Fu, C.C.; Yang, J.C. Traveling wave driven micro-dispenser for CPU cooling application. In Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3–6 October 2006; pp. 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, H.; Cheng, W.; Peng, Y. Experimental study on optimal spray parameters of piezoelectric atomizer based spray cooling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 103, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Basaran, O.A.; Gao, H.; Bhat, P.P. Nonstandard inkjets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2013, 45, 85–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuttruff, H. Ultrasonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  33. Travis, B.; Westphall, M.S.; Smith, L.M. Single-Pulse Nanoelectrospray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 3443–3448. [Google Scholar]
  34. Heij, B.D.; Schoot BV, D.; Bo, H. Modelling and Optimisation of a Vaporiser for Inhalation Drug Therapy. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 19–21 April 1999; pp. 542–545. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pan, C.T.; Shiea, J.; Shen, S.C. Fabrication of an integrated piezo-electric micro-nebulizer for biochemical sample analysis. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2007, 17, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maehara, N.; Ueha, S.; Mori, E. Influence of the vibrating system of a multipinhole-plate ultrasonic nebulizer on its performance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1986, 57, 2870–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maehara, N.; Ueha, S.; Mori, E. Optimum Design Procedure for Multi-Pinhole-Plate Ultrasonic Atomizer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 26, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, C.F.; Chen, C.J.; Fu, C.C. No Back-pressure Effect Micro-dispenser Suction Pump. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 18–20 October 2006; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu, C.F.; Chen, C.J.; Fu, C.C. Anti-wetting trench of nozzle plate for piezoelectric actuating dispenser. In Proceedings of the 2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 21–23 October 2009; pp. 674–677. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shen, S.C.; Wang, Y.J.; Chen, Y.Y. Design and fabrication of medical micro-nebulizer. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 144, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, S.C. A new cymbal-shaped high power microactuator for nebulizer application. Microelectron. Eng. 2010, 87, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yan, Q.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J. The Effect of Vibration Characteristics on the Atomization Rate in a Micro-Tapered Aperture Atomizer. Sensors 2018, 18, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, J.; Yan, Q.; Huang, J. Experimental Verification of the Pumping Effect Caused by the Micro-Tapered Hole in a Piezoelectric Atomizer. Sensors 2018, 18, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.; Xia, Q.; Zhen, H.; Onuki, A. Flow direction of piezoelectric pump with nozzle/diffuser-elements. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2004, 17, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Olsson, A.; Stemme, G.; Stemme, E. Numerical and experimental studies of flat-walled diffuser elements for valve-less micropumps. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2000, 84, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. White, F.M. Fluid Mechanics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003; 866p. [Google Scholar]
  47. Xu, Q.; Osman, A.B. Computational analysis of drop-on-demand drop formation. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19, 102111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of the micro-cone hole atomizer structure and its principles, as provided by Lu. (a) Schematic of the atomizer structure; (b) liquid flow generated in the upward-vibrating micro-tapered aperture; (c) liquid flow generated in the downward-vibrating micro-cone hole.
Figure 1. Illustration of the micro-cone hole atomizer structure and its principles, as provided by Lu. (a) Schematic of the atomizer structure; (b) liquid flow generated in the upward-vibrating micro-tapered aperture; (c) liquid flow generated in the downward-vibrating micro-cone hole.
Applsci 09 01836 g001
Figure 2. Atomizing film: (a) schematic diagram of the atomizing film structure; (b) front view of the atomizing film; (c) back view of the atomizing film; (d) image of the micro-cone hole aperture taken by the environmental scanning electron microscope.
Figure 2. Atomizing film: (a) schematic diagram of the atomizing film structure; (b) front view of the atomizing film; (c) back view of the atomizing film; (d) image of the micro-cone hole aperture taken by the environmental scanning electron microscope.
Applsci 09 01836 g002
Figure 3. Illustrative diagram of the dynamic cone angle.
Figure 3. Illustrative diagram of the dynamic cone angle.
Applsci 09 01836 g003
Figure 4. Empirical curves of the cone angle, the diffuser loss coefficient ξSd, and the nozzle loss coefficient ξSn. (d, L, L1 is defined in figure 4 in references [44].)
Figure 4. Empirical curves of the cone angle, the diffuser loss coefficient ξSd, and the nozzle loss coefficient ξSn. (d, L, L1 is defined in figure 4 in references [44].)
Applsci 09 01836 g004
Figure 5. The modeling of the droplet formation process in one cycle.
Figure 5. The modeling of the droplet formation process in one cycle.
Applsci 09 01836 g005
Figure 6. A photograph of measuring the vibration mode of the piezoelectric vibrator.
Figure 6. A photograph of measuring the vibration mode of the piezoelectric vibrator.
Applsci 09 01836 g006
Figure 7. The measurement of the atomization rate and the atomization height.
Figure 7. The measurement of the atomization rate and the atomization height.
Applsci 09 01836 g007
Figure 8. Measurement of the particle size of the atomized particles.
Figure 8. Measurement of the particle size of the atomized particles.
Applsci 09 01836 g008
Figure 9. A photograph of how the aperture is measured.
Figure 9. A photograph of how the aperture is measured.
Applsci 09 01836 g009
Figure 10. Frequency sweep curves of the vibration velocity and amplitude, vibration modes of resonance points, deformation diagram of piezoelectric oscillator and atomization rates at the resonance points. (a)-(f) Vibration modes of resonance points 1–6 and the corresponding tapered aperture deformation diagrams at these points.
Figure 10. Frequency sweep curves of the vibration velocity and amplitude, vibration modes of resonance points, deformation diagram of piezoelectric oscillator and atomization rates at the resonance points. (a)-(f) Vibration modes of resonance points 1–6 and the corresponding tapered aperture deformation diagrams at these points.
Applsci 09 01836 g010
Figure 11. Variation in the atomization rates with working voltage.
Figure 11. Variation in the atomization rates with working voltage.
Applsci 09 01836 g011
Figure 12. Variation in the atomization heights with working voltage.
Figure 12. Variation in the atomization heights with working voltage.
Applsci 09 01836 g012
Figure 13. Cumulative particle size distribution and analysis results of atomized particles under different working voltages. (X10 is the percentage of cumulative distribution reaches 10%, the corresponding particle size is obtained, X50 is median size, X90 is the percentage of cumulative distribution reaches 10%, the corresponding particle size is obtained, S/V is the surface area specific volume of atomized droplets, SMD is the average diameter of sotail).
Figure 13. Cumulative particle size distribution and analysis results of atomized particles under different working voltages. (X10 is the percentage of cumulative distribution reaches 10%, the corresponding particle size is obtained, X50 is median size, X90 is the percentage of cumulative distribution reaches 10%, the corresponding particle size is obtained, S/V is the surface area specific volume of atomized droplets, SMD is the average diameter of sotail).
Applsci 09 01836 g013aApplsci 09 01836 g013bApplsci 09 01836 g013c
Figure 14. Variation in the diameter of the atomized particles with working voltage.
Figure 14. Variation in the diameter of the atomized particles with working voltage.
Applsci 09 01836 g014
Figure 15. Measurement results of the micro-cone hole under different voltages. (a) −250 V; (b) −125 V; (c) 0 V; (d) 125 V; (e) 250 V.
Figure 15. Measurement results of the micro-cone hole under different voltages. (a) −250 V; (b) −125 V; (c) 0 V; (d) 125 V; (e) 250 V.
Applsci 09 01836 g015
Table 1. Measurement results of the micro-cone hole under different voltages. (d1 is the small diameter of the cone hole, d2 is the large diameter of the cone hole, t is the thickness of the dispenser).
Table 1. Measurement results of the micro-cone hole under different voltages. (d1 is the small diameter of the cone hole, d2 is the large diameter of the cone hole, t is the thickness of the dispenser).
Measurement Resultd1 (μm)U (V)d2 (μm)t (μm)Angle (°)
110.58−25082.565071.49
210.64−12582.245071.21
310.77081.815070.78
410.9112581.325070.30
510.9625081.035070.04

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Q.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J. Effect of the Dynamic Cone Angle on the Atomization Performance of a Piezoceramic Vibrating Mesh Atomizer. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091836

AMA Style

Yan Q, Wu C, Zhang J. Effect of the Dynamic Cone Angle on the Atomization Performance of a Piezoceramic Vibrating Mesh Atomizer. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(9):1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091836

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Qiufeng, Chuanyu Wu, and Jianhui Zhang. 2019. "Effect of the Dynamic Cone Angle on the Atomization Performance of a Piezoceramic Vibrating Mesh Atomizer" Applied Sciences 9, no. 9: 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091836

APA Style

Yan, Q., Wu, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). Effect of the Dynamic Cone Angle on the Atomization Performance of a Piezoceramic Vibrating Mesh Atomizer. Applied Sciences, 9(9), 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091836

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop