Next Article in Journal
Applied Sciences Special Issue: Ultrasonic Guided Waves
Previous Article in Journal
Determining the Variability of the Territorial Sea Baseline on the Example of Waterbody Adjacent to the Municipal Beach in Gdynia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A G-Code Generator for Volumetric Models

Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(18), 3868; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183868
by Shyh-Kuang Ueng *, Hsuan-Kai Huang and Hsin-Cheng Huang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(18), 3868; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183868
Submission received: 24 August 2019 / Revised: 7 September 2019 / Accepted: 12 September 2019 / Published: 15 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article presents a new slicer and a new G-codes generator for volumetric models.This slicer first finds the best printing direction using the inertia tensor of the printed model. Then it detects and classifies overhangs and generate supports structures. After, applies imaging techniques to divide model to skin and internal volume and to cut model into 2d images and finally produce g-codes.

The methods used to explore the issue are suitable and are applied thoroughly through the reference citing suitable literature.

The conclusions are in accordance with the past literature.

But still the following improvements can to be done to improve the quality of the article.

The author should have investigated a greater number of recent studies in this area.

For  example:

Line 112 insert some papers like the following that investigates accuracy issue of 3d printed parts.

K Kitsakis, P Alabey, J Kechagias, N Vaxevanidis: A Study of the dimensional accuracy obtained by low cost 3D printing for possible application in medicine. 11/2016; 161(1):012025., DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/161/1/012025

Line 114 insert a citation like the following

Peristera Alabey, Menelaos Pappas, John Kechagias, Stergios Maropoulos: Medical Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing: Status and Outlook. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Istanbul, Tr; 07/2010, DOI:10.1115/ESDA2010-24361

Line 166.    the fabrication time[insert the following citation]

[] Kechagias J, Anagnostopoulos V, Zervos S, Chryssolouris G: Estimation of build times in Rapid Prototyping processes. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing -EuRP&M1997, University of Nottingham, UK; 01/1997

Line  179 . In this work, we assume that that the…

Author Response

Please see the attachments. Thanks.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

 

Comment 1: According to Template file, abstract needs to have 200 words maximum. In this paper version, it is 234 words. If is possible, try to reduce the number of words in abstract.

 

Comment 2: line 28

Wrong: 0. Introduction

Correct: 1. Introduction

See instructions in Template file. In Template file is writing next:

How to Use This Template

The template details the sections that can be used in a manuscript. Note that each section has a corresponding style, which can be found in the ‘Styles’ menu of Word. Sections that are not mandatory are listed as such. The section titles given are for Articles. Review papers and other article types have a more flexible structure.

Remove this paragraph and start section numbering with 1. For any questions, please contact the editorial office of the journal or [email protected].

 

Also, it is necessary to fix and other numbers of sections in paper

 

Comment 3: line 238

Wrong: Figure 2.

Correct: Figure 2.

 

Comment 4: line 271

Wrong: Figure 4.

Correct: Figure 4.

 

Comment 5: line 297

Wrong: Figure 5.

Correct: Figure 5.

 

Comment 6: line 325

Wrong: Figure 6.

Correct: Figure 6.

 

Comment 7: line 310

Wrong: 2.3 Internal Region Hatching

Correct: 3.6 Internal Region Hatching

 

Comment 8: line 332

Wrong: 2.4 Toolpath and G-code Generation

Correct: 3.7 Toolpath and G-code Generation

 

 Comment 9: line 354

Wrong: Figure 7.

Correct: Figure 7.

 

Comment 10: line 377

Wrong: Figure 8.

Correct: Figure 8.

 

Comment 11: line 397

Wrong: Table 1.

Correct: Table 1.

 

Comment 12: page 11

Wrong: Table 1. Settings of the 3D printer.

Correct: Table 2. Settings of the 3D printer.

 

Comment 13: page 11

Wrong: Figure 9.

Correct: Figure 9.

 

Comment 14: line 411

Wrong: Figure 10.

Correct: Figure 10.

 

Comment 15: line 427

Wrong: Figure 11.

Correct: Figure 11.

 

Comment 16: line 430

Wrong: Figure 12.

Correct: Figure 12.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop