Next Article in Journal
An Efficient Time Reversal Method for Lamb Wave-Based Baseline-Free Damage Detection in Composite Laminates
Previous Article in Journal
A Mobile App to Learn About Cultural and Historical Associations in a Closed Loop with Humanities Experts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Design Parameters on Drying of Kiwi Fruit

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Firat University, Elaziğ 23119, Turkey
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Firat University, Elaziğ 23119, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010010
Submission received: 21 November 2018 / Revised: 12 December 2018 / Accepted: 19 December 2018 / Published: 20 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Abstract

:
In this study, the drying of kiwi fruit in a convective dryer is examined experimentally. Air velocity, thickness of the slices and drying time are the varied parameters in drying process. In the experimental study, kiwi slices having thickness of 4 and 8 mm are dried in the dryer under the conditions of 45 °C temperature of the drying air, 10% relative humidity and 0.5–1.5 m/s drying air velocity. In addition to the tests, the effects of mentioned drying parameters on drying are analyzed by ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) method to find the contribution rate of each parameter. For this aim, an orthogonal array is arranged by using Taguchi design of experiment method. As the results of experiments and variance analysis, it has been determined that, drying air velocity plays a significant effect on total drying time. The minimum drying time (225 min) is achieved for 1.5 m/s for 4 mm slices, and the maximum drying time (750 min) is achieved for 0.5 m/s for the kiwi sample sliced 8 mm thick. It is also concluded that, working with the convective dryer at different velocities is advantageous in terms of preserving brightness and color quality.

1. Introduction

Since agricultural products produced in large quantities are not immediately consumed, the durability times are very short. Keeping these products fresh is possible as a result of some special operations. Drying is the leading of the processes that intended to extend the economic life of agricultural products without losing their nutritious properties during the time elapsed until the moment of consumption of the products. Drying is defined as a method of industrial scale protection with heated air to reduce water activity by reducing the water content of fruits and vegetables and thus minimize biochemical, chemical and microbiological degradation [1]. Drying is a process in which 80–95% of water within the agricultural products is reduced to 10–20% and maintained for a long time. However, the quality characteristics such as taste, appearance, color, nutritional value should be changed as little as possible and when the water is added on them for cooking, they should be able to absorb the water as close as to the amount they had when they were fresh. Drying of kiwi fruit is often followed by physical and chemical changes which dramatically influence the process itself. One of the most important consequences of these changes is shrinkage: a volume reduction, coupled with shape and porosity changes and hardness increase. Such phenomena could also be followed by surface cracking. Therefore, shrinkage has to be avoided because such physical changes contribute in general to reduce the quality perceived by the end consumer of dehydrated products, traditionally consumed fresh. Obvious exceptions are represented by foods, like dried plums and dates, usually eaten shrunken.
The drying process itself is actually a heat and mass transfer phenomenon and drying agricultural products with solar energy has been used from ancient times to present as a method of product storage. The quality of food is drastically reduced in the solar drying due to rain, dust that wind causes, dirt and contact of various creatures such as insects and flies. Overcoming these problems is possible when the drying process is carried out in the designed closed systems. In the drying processes in natural environments, long periods of drying, the product being vulnerable to environmental influences and the decrease in nutritional value cause loss of quality and economic value in products. For this reason, the drying process with artificial dryers that have special purposes not only shortens the drying time but also ensures to get a higher quality and clean product with a long shelf life. Drying of a wide variety of fruits and vegetables is provided with artificial dryers; for instance, apricots [2], bananas [3], apples [4], potatoes [5], onions [6], eggplant [7], pear [8] are only some of the vegetables and fruits dried in artificial dryers and analyzed for drying.
In this study, the kiwifruit is analyzed for drying and it is a fruit species grown in different regions of Turkey. Kiwifruit contains 80% water, 20% dry matter and is rich in vitamin C. 100–400 mg of vitamin C is found in 100 g of the said fresh fruit [9]. Vitamin C content is an important factor that makes kiwifruit a worthy and sought-after fruit. The proportion of vitamin C in the fruit varies according to environmental conditions, the state of development and maturation, and even where the fruit is situated on the plant [9]. The mineral content values of kiwifruit are shown in Table 1 [9].
The kiwi fruit is used to obtain fruit juice and is consumed freshly. Additionally, it is used in the food industry for making pastry and dessert. Besides the nutritional value of kiwifruit, it is also used in medicine. Analyzes in China have shown that certain substances in fruit juice prevent factors that cause cancer. When used in combination with certain medicinal drinks, it has been utilized as breath spray against asthma and cough [10,11,12,13].
There are some works in the literature that examine the effects of parameters during drying of agricultural products such as humidity, air temperature and flow rate. Singh and Pandey [14] have examined the effects of drying conditions on the drying behavior of sweet potato in a drying cabinet. In a dryer, the drying behavior of sweet potatoes of 5, 8 and 12 mm thick was investigated for various air temperatures (50–90 °C) and air velocity (1.5–5.5 m/s). Brasiello et al. [7], analyzed the evolution of the water content profiles inside cylindrical samples of eggplant during dehydration at 50, 60 and 70 °C using a mathematical model which takes into account shrinkage effects. Guine and Fernandes [15] performed drying behaviors of three different kinds of chestnuts under isothermal conditions at 70, 80 and 90 °C. Karim and Hawlader [16] developed a different mathematical simulation for the drying of banana by examining the drying characteristics of the product. Maskan [17] studied the color change of kiwifruit during the drying of the product with hot air and microwave. Proietti et al. [8], evaluated the water transport mechanism and shrinkage in pear during process carried out at 45, 50 and 55 °C by portable Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) with the aim of optimizing the process. Velic et al. [18] investigated the effect of the air velocity on the drying of apple in a convective dryer.
In this paper, the drying characteristics of kiwifruit were presented experimentally for kiwi samples 4 mm and 8 mm thick at air temperature of 45 °C and air velocity of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 m/s in a convective type dryer. For this purpose, an experimental setup was established and required measurements were performed.

2. Experimental Study

2.1. Setup

A new experimental dryer setup was constructed in order to perform the tests. Figure 1 shows a schematic view of convective type dryer.
As seen in Figure 1, the setup includes fan, heater, drying cabinet, air flow duct, air inlet and outlet ducts, hygrometer, a digital scale with a measurement range of 0–6100 g with a sensitivity of ±0.1 g to measure the mass loss of the product. The digital scale is 30 cm long, 19 cm in wide. A drying tray with a length of 27 cm and a width of 21 cm was manufactured to be connected to the scale and the products to be dried were placed on the tray and the product mass loss was read out at regular intervals. The drying room is in a shape of a rectangular prism with 60 mm length, 40 mm width, 60 mm height, and is made of a steel sheet with a thickness of 3 mm. A hole with a diameter of 120 mm was made at the bottom of the cabinet and connected to the air flow duct. The hot air coming from the flow channel was aerated with the product from below and a 100 mm diameter duct was opened to the side surface of the cabinet to vent the warmed air. The air flow channel, which is connected to the drying room at the bottom, has a length of 2.5 m and is in a shape of a circular diameter of 120 mm, and is made of a steel sheet with a thickness of 3 mm. This channel is insulated with a glass wool with a thickness of 30 mm and the upper part is covered with aluminum tape. The temperature of the kiwi fruit and of the cabinet outlet can be determined by using the T type thermocouple by means of the temperature measurement tools located on the cabinet. The air flow rate was controlled by a radial fan with a power of 0.537 kW. The radial fan has 50 Hz, 220 V and a currency of 2.5 A. The fan used in the system is a constant speed (2800 rpm). The heating system consists of wires with a power of 2000 W, and the drying air temperature required for drying is fixed by means of a variac. The cabinet outlet temperature and the internal temperature of the product are measured by means of a thermometer with a measurement range of −20 to +80 °C. The drying air velocity was determined by means of an anemometer with a measurement range of 0.15–3 m/s. The kiwi samples required to be dried were placed on the tray connected to the scale and the mass loss was recorded at 15 min intervals. The measuring instruments developed in this experimental work are showed in Table 2 with photos and technical specifications [19].

2.2. Data Reduction

Moisture content is a measure of relative humidity present in the sample. Moisture content is offered in two forms, wet base and dry base [20]. While moisture content according to wet base:
M w b = M w M T
expressed by the equation above, moisture content according to dry base:
M d b = M w M k
is shown by the equation above where Mw is the water mass of the sample, MT is the total mass of the sample, and Mk is the dry mass of the sample. The ratio of the moisture content of the mass at any given t time to the moisture content at the beginning is called drying rate and can be expressed as follows:
W s = M t M e M 0   M e
is determined by the equation above where; Mt is mass of the sample at considered time t, Me is mass of the equilibrium humidity of sample and M0 is the initial mass of the sample.
The change of the moisture content in the dried product in unit time is called drying air velocity. The drying air velocity is calculated by the expressed equation:
d W d t = M t M t + Δ t Δ t
where Mt+Δt is the weight of the product at the t + Δt time.

2.3. Material and Methods

Fresh kiwi fruits used in the experiment are harvested in Elazig province. Since they were grown in accordance with organic agriculture methods, no chemical substances such as synthetic fertilizer and pesticide were used. Ripe and sound kiwi were harvested by hand and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C until drying experiments. After 3 h stabilization at ambient temperature, homogenous samples (142 g) were washed with tap water and hand peeled, cored with a knife and then cut vertical to their axis into cylindrical slices of 4 and 8 mm thickness using with a mechanical cutter. In order to determine color differences after drying, the kiwi slices were also dried in their natural form, which was called as untreated samples. About 142 g samples of kiwi slices were used for drying measurement. The drying was carried out to final moisture content of 10% from initial moisture content of about 80%.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Results of Experiments

The experiments examining the effect of air velocity on drying in the drying process of the kiwifruit were carried out for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 m/s of air at 45 °C and a relative humidity of 10%. Fresh kiwi samples with slice thickness of 4 mm and 8 mm were used in the experiments. The dryer was adjusted to be selected drying air temperature for about one an hour prior to the start of experiment to achieve the steady-state conditions. Fresh kiwi fruits were used in this study. Achieving 3 h stabilization under the ambient temperature conditions, homogenous samples were first hygienized then cored with a knife and then cut vertically to their axis into cylindrical slices of 4 and 8 mm thickness by a mechanical cutter. Then 142 g of kiwifruit was placed on the drying tray. The mass loss of the kiwifruit during drying was measured from the scale for every 15 min. The chamber was installed under the laboratory conditions that were a relative humidity of between 20% and 45% and a temperature of between 22 and 28 °C. The drying was carried out to final moisture content of 10% from initial moisture content of about 80%.
View of kiwi fruits used in this study given in Figure 2a–c. The drying phases of the kiwifruit are photographed. Fresh kiwifruits used in this study are given in Figure 2a the kiwi samples placed in the drying cabinet are shown in Figure 2b (on the left); dried kiwi samples are shown in Figure 2b (on the right). The dried kiwi samples with thickness of 4 mm and 8 mm are shown in Figure 2c.
The moisture content of the product, as a function of drying time, is shown in Figure 3 for the kiwifruit with a thickness of 4 mm, the drying air temperature of 45 °C and the drying air velocity of 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s and 1.5 m/s. As seen from the drying curves, the drying air velocity has affected the moisture content of the kiwifruit. The lowest drying time (225 min) was achieved with a thickness of 4 mm and a drying speed of 1.5 m/s. The highest drying time (360 min) was obtained for a thickness of 4 mm and a drying speed of 0.5 m/s.
The moisture content of the product, as a function of drying time, is shown in Figure 4 for the kiwi fruit with a thickness of 8 mm, the drying air temperature of 45 °C and the drying air velocity of 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s and 1.5 m/s. The lowest drying time (420 min) was achieved with a thickness of 8 mm and a drying speed of 1.5 m/s. The highest drying time (750 min) was found for a thickness of 8 mm and a drying speed of 0.5 m/s. This value is followed by 540 min (8 mm and 1 m/s).
Figure 5 and Figure 6, as a function of drying time, shows the change in drying rate. This change was given for the kiwifruit with a thickness of 4 mm and 8 mm and air temperature of 45 °C at air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s. The drying rate decreases continuously with increasing drying time. It was tested that the main factor influencing drying rate is the drying air velocity, as reported in earlier studies [21,22].
The internal temperature of the product is shown in Figure 7 for the kiwifruit with a thickness of 4 mm, air temperature of 45 °C at a drying air velocity of 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s and 1.5 m/s. The surface temperature of kiwifruit was constantly recorded during drying experiments from the scale for every 15 min. The surface temperature increases rapidly and behind becomes steady slowly with the increasing drying time. When the drying time reached the end, the lowest temperature for kiwifruit was 37.1 °C (4 mm, 0.5 m/s) and the highest temperature was 39.5 °C (4 mm, 1.5 m/s). It was showed that the influencing surface temperature of harvest is the drying air velocity, as presented in old studies by Karim and Hawlader for banana [16].
The internal temperature of the product is shown in Figure 8 for the kiwifruit with a thickness of 8 mm, air temperature of 45 °C at a drying air velocity of 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s and 1.5 m/s. The surface temperature of the kiwifruit was recorded during drying and it was shown that the surface temperature increased rapidly and then became constant. The drying time to reach the final the lowest temperature for kiwi fruit were 39 °C (8 mm, 0,5 m/s), the highest temperature for kiwi fruit were 42.4 °C (8 mm, 1.5 m/s). This value is followed by 40.9 °C (8 mm, 1 m/s).
Mass loss of the products as a function of drying time are shown in Figure 9 for 45 °C air temperatures and for 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s and 1.5 m/s air velocity and kiwifruit slice thicknesses of 4 mm and 8 mm. The lowest drying time (225 min) was found at 4 mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 m/s. The highest drying time (750 min) was found at 8 mm slice thicknesses and 0.5 m/s velocity. This value is followed by 540 min (8 mm, 1 m/s), 420 min (8 mm, 1.5 m/s), 360 min (4 mm, 0,5 m/s), 300 min (4 mm, 1 m/s), respectively.

3.2. Design Analysis and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Statistical approaches are used when experimental designs are applied to any system. However, experimental design techniques are not just related to statistics. These techniques are approaches that improve quality, reduce costs and significantly reduce the number of experiments by being used in all research and development activities. In this way resources are being used more efficiently, saving both time and material substantially. The parameters, or alias control factors, selected to enable this work to be performed are; thickness, speed, and drying time. The parameters and their levels are given in Table 3.
As design of experiment method, the Taguchi technique was used. In this method a statistical value known as the signal to noise (S/N) ratio is used to analyze the results obtained from the experiments where S refers to signal and N refers to noise. The results obtained from the experiments are evaluated by converting them to the S/N ratio. The S is the actual value obtained from the system, and N points out the factors that does not participate in the experiment design but has an effect on the experimental result. Noise sources are all variables that cause the value of the analyzed performance characteristic to deviate from the target value. So the smaller the N value, the closer the target value is. For this reason, the purpose of this method is always to maximize the S/N ratio. There are various S/N ratios in the literature. In this study, it is desired that the humidity rate value we regard as performance characteristic is minimum. For this reason, the lower is better (LB) criterion is used.
The S/N ratios calculated for the humidity rate and the orthogonal array L18 test design are given in Table 3. The averages of the S/N ratios given in Table 3 are presented graphically in Figure 10.
It was mentioned that the S/N ratio has to be maximized at all times. In other words, optimum values always occur at the greatest S/N ratios. Accordingly, when Figure 10 is examined it is clear that the optimum levels will take place in the case of A1B3C3. The optimum levels are shown in Table 4.
The main purpose of applying ANOVA method is that, the effect of the parameters used in the experiments on the "humidity rate" which we have determined as the performance characteristic can be determined in percentages [23]. However, in order to determine whether the parameters used in the experiments have a statistically significant effect on the performance characteristic, an analysis called F test is also required. The large value of the F test means that the effect of the parameters studied on the performance characteristic is also significant. The statistical calculation method required for calculating this value is given in Appendix A.
The value of F given in Appendix A is found by dividing the variance of the parameter being considered by its variance of error. If the calculated values are greater than the tabular values in consequence of the comparison of the F values with the appropriate reliability tables, it is concluded that the parameters have an effect on the performance characteristic which must be statistically accounted. In this study, in consequence of the comparison made according to the tables with 99% confidence level, it was seen that all the parameters provided this confidence level, and that is to say, they have effects on the results that must be accounted. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are exhibited in Table 5.
According to the ANOVA results; it was determined that the most important parameter affecting the amount of moisture was drying time with 45.79%. Drying time was followed by speed with 29.54% and thickness with 17.32%.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

Drying conditions of the kiwi fruits were presented in a convective type air dryer at the air temperatures of 45 °C and air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and kiwifruit slice thicknesses of 4 mm and 8 mm. Some important results obtained from this study can be listed as follows;
The drying rate and the moisture content of the sample are affected by the thickness of the kiwifruit and the speed of the drying air. Increased drying air velocity and reduced fruit thickness cause drying time to be reduced.
The lowest drying time (225 min) was obtained at 4 mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 m/s. The highest drying time (750 min) was obtained at 8 mm slice thicknesses and 0.5 m/s velocity.
The drying was carried out to final moisture content of 10% from initial moisture content of about 80% (wb).
Freshly harvested kiwifruit was successfully dried in the convective dryer at different speeds and at different thicknesses. It has been determined that working the convective dryer at different speeds is advantageous in terms of preserving brightness and color quality.
By applying ANOVA to the test results it was found that, the most dominant parameter affecting the amount of moisture was drying time with 45.79%. Drying time was followed by air velocity with 29.54% and thickness of the slices with 17.32%.
The taste quality of the samples are not tasted, hence this study gives only information about the drying process. Further nutrition analysis are recommended by the co-authors of this study.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “conceptualization, F.O.; methodology, F.O.; investigation, F.O. and N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, N.C.; writing—review and editing, N.C.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

S S m = ( η i ) 2 n
S S f a c t o r = η f a c t o r i 2 N S S m
S S T = η i 2 S S m
S S e = S S T S S A
dftotal = n − 1
dffactor = k − 1
V f a c t o r = S S f a c t o r d f f a c t o r
F f a c t o r = V f a c t o r V e r r o r
where SST is the total sums of squares, SSm is the sums of square due to the mean, SSfactor is the sums of squares due to factor, SSe is the sum of squared due to error, ηfactor-i the sum of i th level of factor, N is the repeating number of each levels of factors, df is the number of degrees of freedom, n is the number of the experiments, k is the number of factor’s level, Vfactor is the variance of the factor, Ffactor is the F-test value of the factor, j is the number of experiments in the orthogonal array [23].

Appendix B. NOMENCLATURE

Mwmass of water in the sample, g
MTtotal mass of sample, g
Mkdry mass of sample, g
Mwbmoisture content according to wet basis, g/g
Mdbmoisture content according to dry basis, g/g
Mtmass at time t of sample, g
Mt+Δtmass at time t + Δt of sample, g
M0initial mass of undried sample, g
Meequilibrium moisture content of sample (g water/g dry matter)
nnumber of experiments
SSesum of square due to error
SSfactorsum of square due to factor
SSmmean sum of square
SSTtotal sum of square
S/Nsignal to noise ratio (η)
ρ air density, kg/m3
νdrying air speed, m/s
Vfactorvariance of the factor
Wdrying air velocity, m/s
Wsdrying rate, g water/g dry matter h
ΔTtemperature difference, K

References

  1. Cerci, K.N.; Kavak Akpinar, E. Experimental determination of convective heat transfer coefficient during open sun and greenhouse drying of apple slices. J. Therm. Eng. 2016, 2, 741–747. [Google Scholar]
  2. Togrul, I.T.; Pehlivan, D. Modelling of drying kinetics of single apricot. J. Food Eng. 2003, 58, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nimmol, C.; Devahastin, S.; Swasdisevi, T.; Soponronnarit, S. Drying and heat transfer behavior of banana undergoing combined low-pressure superheated steam and far-infrared radiation drying. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2007, 27, 2483–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sacilik, K.; Elicin, A.K. The thin layer drying characteristics of organic apple slices. J. Food Eng. 2006, 73, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kavak Akpinar, E.; Midilli, A.; Bicer, Y. Single layer drying behavior of potato slices in a convective cyclone dryer and mathematical modelling. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003, 44, 1689–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arslan, D.; Ozcan, M.M. Study the effect of sun, oven and microwave drying on quality of onion slices. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brasiello, A.; Iannone, G.; Adiletta, G.; De Pasquale, S.; Russo, P.; Di Matteo, M. Mathematical model for dehydration and shrinkage: Prediction of eggplant’s MRI spatial profiles. J. Food Eng. 2017, 203, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Proietti, N.; Adiletta, G.; Russo, P.; Buonocore, R.; Mannina, L.; Crescitelli, A.; Capitani, D. Evolution of physicochemical properties of pear during drying by conventional techniques, portable-NMR, and modeling. J. Food Eng. 2018, 230, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gorinstein, S.; Haruenkit, R.; Poovarodom, S.; Park, Y.; Vearasilp, S.; Suhaj, M.; Ham, K.; Heo, B.; Cho, J.; Jang, H.G. The comparative characteristics of snake and kiwi fruits. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 1884–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dalvand, M.J.; Mohtasebi, S.S.; Rafiee, S. Study on effective structural parameters on drying rate of kiwi fruits in a solar EHD dryer. Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng. 2012, 3, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mohammadi, A.; Rafiee, S.; Keyhani, A.; Emam-Djomeh, Z. Estimation of thin-layer drying characteristics of kiwifruit (cv. Hayward) with use of page’s model. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2008, 3, 802–805. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Isolation of an antifungal thaumatin-like protein from kiwi fruits. Phytochemistry 2002, 61, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaya, A.; Aydın, O.; Dincer, I. Experimental and numerical investigation of heat and mass transfer during drying of Hayward kiwi fruits (Actinidia deliciosa Planch). J. Food Eng. 2008, 88, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, N.J.; Pandey, R.K. Convective air drying characteristics of sweet potato cube (Ipomoea batatas L.). Food Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guine, R.P.F.; Fernandes, R.M.C. Analysis of the drying kinetics of chestnuts. J. Food Eng. 2006, 76, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karim, M.A.; Hawlader, M.N.A. Drying characteristics of banana: Theoretical modelling and experimental validation. J. Food Eng. 2005, 70, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maskan, M. Kinetics of color change of kiwi fruits during hot air and microwave drying. J. Food Eng. 2001, 48, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Velic, D.; Planınic, M.; Tomas, S.; Bilic, M. Influence of airflow velocity on kinetics of convection apple drying. J. Food Eng. 2004, 64, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ozgen, F. Experimental investigation of drying characteristics of cornelian cherry fruits (Cornus mas L.). Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 51, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Darici, S.; Şen, S. Investigation of effects of drying air velocity on drying at drying of kiwi (Kivi meyvesinin kurutulmasında kurutma havası hızının kurumaya etkisinin incelenmesi). Tesisat Mühendisliği 2012, 130, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  21. Doymaz, I. Air drying characteristics of tomatoes. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Xi, Y.S. Drying characteristics and drying quality of carrot using a two-stage microwave process. J. Food Eng. 2005, 68, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Celik, N.; Turgut, E. Design analysis of an experimental jet impingement study by using Taguchi method. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 48, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Setup (1. Hygrometer [HTC-1], 2. Precision scale (AVERY BERKEL, Model CC061), 3. Thermometer-Anemometer [KIMO], 4. Outlet, 5. Tray, 6. Chamber, 7. Air flow channel, 8. Heating system, 9. Fan [SB908AN-22-3], 10. Variac [STACO 3PN1520B]).
Figure 1. Setup (1. Hygrometer [HTC-1], 2. Precision scale (AVERY BERKEL, Model CC061), 3. Thermometer-Anemometer [KIMO], 4. Outlet, 5. Tray, 6. Chamber, 7. Air flow channel, 8. Heating system, 9. Fan [SB908AN-22-3], 10. Variac [STACO 3PN1520B]).
Applsci 09 00010 g001
Figure 2. View of kiwi fruits used in this study, (a) Fresh kiwi fruits, (b) The view of the kiwi fruits in the dryer chamber (in left) and the view of the dried kiwi fruits (in right), (c) The view of the dried kiwi fruits for slice thickness of 4 mm (in left) and dried kiwi fruits for slice thickness of 8 mm (in right).
Figure 2. View of kiwi fruits used in this study, (a) Fresh kiwi fruits, (b) The view of the kiwi fruits in the dryer chamber (in left) and the view of the dried kiwi fruits (in right), (c) The view of the dried kiwi fruits for slice thickness of 4 mm (in left) and dried kiwi fruits for slice thickness of 8 mm (in right).
Applsci 09 00010 g002
Figure 3. Moisture content wet basis as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 3. Moisture content wet basis as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g003
Figure 4. Moisture content wet basis as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 4. Moisture content wet basis as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g004
Figure 5. Drying rate as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 5. Drying rate as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g005
Figure 6. Drying rate as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 6. Drying rate as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g006
Figure 7. Surface temperature as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 7. Surface temperature as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 4 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g007
Figure 8. Surface temperature as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Figure 8. Surface temperature as a function of drying time for drying air velocity of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 m/s and slice thicknesses of 8 mm for kiwi fruits.
Applsci 09 00010 g008
Figure 9. Mass loss of kiwi fruits at different slice thicknesses.
Figure 9. Mass loss of kiwi fruits at different slice thicknesses.
Applsci 09 00010 g009
Figure 10. Average η for humidity rate.
Figure 10. Average η for humidity rate.
Applsci 09 00010 g010
Table 1. Mineral content of kiwi fruits organic (mg/kg) [9].
Table 1. Mineral content of kiwi fruits organic (mg/kg) [9].
IndicesKiwi
P2640 ± 111
K17.418 ± 639
Ca1512 ± 15
Mg864 ± 41
Na242 ± 12
Fe16.1 ± 0.8
Mn22.4 ± 1.2
Cu1.14 ± 0.1
Zn10.8 ± 0.3
B6.11 ± 0.3
S164 ± 5.7
Table 2. Photos and technical specifications of the dryer [19].
Table 2. Photos and technical specifications of the dryer [19].
UnitTechnical SpecificationPhotos
Drying chamberiron sheet (3 mm); length: 60 mm; width: 40 mm; height: 60 mm. Applsci 09 00010 i001
Air flow channelgalvanized sheet; length: 2.5 m; pipe diameter: 120 mm; insulation thickness 30 mm. Applsci 09 00010 i002
Precision scaleMeasurement range 0–6100 g and an accuracy of ± 0,1 g; digital scale length 30 cm; width 19 cm; sample tray length 27 cm; width 21 cm. AVERY BERKEL (Model CC061) Applsci 09 00010 i003
Radial Fan0.537 kW power; 220 V; 50 Hz; 2.5 A; 2800 1/min [SB908AN-22-3]. Applsci 09 00010 i004
Heating system2000 W heater placed inside duct Applsci 09 00010 i005
Thermometer-AnemometerTemperature measuring ranges: from −20 to +80 °C; Air velocity measuring ranges; from 0.15 to 3 m/s; sizes 50–34.9 mm; Thermocouple K, J or T [KIMO]. Applsci 09 00010 i006
Variac From 0 to +260 V; 2.5 A; 50 Hz [STACO 3PN1520B]. Applsci 09 00010 i007
Hygrometer and temperature measurementfrom 0 to +45°C (±5 °C),
from 10 to 90% RH (± 5% RH) [HTC-1].
Applsci 09 00010 i008
Table 3. S/N ratio and control factors.
Table 3. S/N ratio and control factors.
Experiment No. Control Factors S/N Ratio
ABC
11112.947656
21125.154078
311312.59733
41212.685227
51225.231762
612312.99799
71317.795295
813213.54313
913322.39837
102110.129565
112121.065896
122136.835554
132210.658958
142221.664354
152236.343403
162314.421369
172327.954719
1823313.04653
Table 4. Optimum levels of the variances.
Table 4. Optimum levels of the variances.
Average S/N Ratios (dB)
Control factorsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
AThickness of the slices (mm)9.48 *4.68--
BAir velocity (m/s)4.794.9311.53 *
CDrying time (min)3.115.7712.37 *
Average S/N ratio = 7.08 dB, * Optimum Level.
Table 5. Results of variance analysis.
Table 5. Results of variance analysis.
FactorDegree of Freedom (df)Sum of Square (SS)Variance (V)FContribution (%)
A1103.8263775103.826441.0604817.31623091
B2177.869611188.9348135.1712829.54121585
C2272.9478971136.473953.971745.79426629
Error1230.343445422.5286207.348286946
Total 584.9873311
* Significant at least 99% confidence level.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ozgen, F.; Celik, N. Evaluation of Design Parameters on Drying of Kiwi Fruit. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010010

AMA Style

Ozgen F, Celik N. Evaluation of Design Parameters on Drying of Kiwi Fruit. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ozgen, Filiz, and Nevin Celik. 2019. "Evaluation of Design Parameters on Drying of Kiwi Fruit" Applied Sciences 9, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop