Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Synthesis of Some New Fluorinated Hexahydroquinoline and Acridinedione Derivatives in Trifluoroethanol
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Nanoparticles Aggregation in Magnetic Gel Studied by Electron Magnetic Resonance (EMR)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Liquid-Phase Direct Fluorination: Novel Synthetic Methods for a Polyfluorinated Coating Material and a Monomer of a Perfluorinated Polymer Electrolyte Membrane
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/app2020351
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Environmentally Friendly Class of Fluoropolyether: α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers

by
Menghua Wu
1,
Walter Navarrini
1,2,*,
Gianfranco Spataro
3,
Francesco Venturini
1 and
Maurizio Sansotera
1
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Politecnico di Milano,7, via Mancinelli, I-20131 Milano, Italy
2
Consorzio INSTM, Via G. Giusti 9, I-50121, Firenze, Italy
3
C.R.S. Solvay Secialty Polymer, viale Lombardia 20, I-20021 Bollate (MI), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2012, 2(2), 351-367; https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020351
Submission received: 21 February 2012 / Revised: 27 March 2012 / Accepted: 27 March 2012 / Published: 11 April 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organo-Fluorine Chemical Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The α,ω-dialkoxyfluoropolyethers (DA-FPEs) characterized by the structure RHO(CF2CF2O)n(CF2O)mRH have been developed as a new class of environmentally friendly hydrofluoroethers (HFEs) suitable as solvents, long-term refrigerants, cleaning fluids, and heat transfer fluids. Synthetic methodologies for DA-FPEs described here consist of radical-initiated oxypolymerization of olefin, peroxy-elimination reaction in peroxidic perfluoropolyethers (P-PFPEs) and further chemical modification of α,ω-diacylfluoride PFPE. The physical properties of selected α,ω-dimethoxyfluoropolyethers (DM-FPEs) have been evaluated and compared with analogous hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) having -OCF2H as end-groups. Atmospheric implications and global warming potentials (GWPs) of selected DA-FPEs are also considered.

1. Introduction

α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers (DA-FPEs) are partially fluorinated polyethers not containing chlorine atoms. Hence, they do not contribute to ozone depletion [1].
RHO(CF2CF2O)n(CF2O)mRH RH = CH3,C2H5, CH2=CHCH3 (1)
The incorporation of two alkoxy-groups provides reactive sites, which limit their atmospheric lifetime [1,2,3]; therefore, when compared with perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs), they have a lower environmental impact in terms of global warming potential (GWP) [1]. Furthermore, perfluorinated ether units from polymeric backbones also makes them well characterized by typical properties of PFPEs, like high thermal and chemical stability, no acute toxicity and excellent heat exchange properties [4]. Lastly, due to the presence of the above-mentioned alkoxy-groups as ending groups, they show good solvent properties with several organic liquids, such as ketones and alcohols [5]. All these appealing properties of DA-FPEs make them excellent candidates as CFC, perfluocarbons and halons substitutes in a number of applications, like foaming and fire extinguishing agents, cleaning agents for sophisticated electronic devices and heat transfer fluids [6,7,8].

2. Syntheses of α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers

The synthesis of DA-FPEs described here involves a combination of a few innovative and conventional synthetic technologies. The whole process includes the following steps: (1) The oxidative polymerization of perfluoroolefinic monomers into peroxidic perfluoropolyethers (P-PFPEs) as a precursor; (2) the subsequent reduction of P-PFPEs to produce diacyl fluorides perfluoropolyether (DAF-PFPE); (3) and the further chemical modification of α,ω-diacyl functional groups of DAF-PFPE to yield the final products α,ω-dialkoxyfluoropolyethers.

2.1. Oxypolymerization of Perfluoroolefin

Oxidative polymerization of perfluoroolefinc monomers like tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) by molecular oxygen into P-PFPEs (A) described in Figure 1, is a well-known reaction [9].
Applsci 02 00351 g001 1024
Figure 1. Oxidative polymerization of tetrafluoroethylene.
Figure 1. Oxidative polymerization of tetrafluoroethylene.
Applsci 02 00351 g001
The forming peroxidic polymer has the following general structure: TO-(CF2CF2O)p-(CF2O)r-(O)q-T’, comprising fluoroether repeating units (-CF2CF2O- and -CF2O-), interspersed peroxy units (-CF2CF2OO- and -CF2OO-) and perfluorinated alkyl groups, acyl fluoride or fluoroformate as chain end-groups (T, T’). Practically, this oxypolymerization can be activated either by high energy UV light or by employing elemental fluorine or perfluoroalkyl hypofluorites, especially CF3OF, as chemical initiators [9]. The peroxidic polymer is the result of a complex free radical oxidation reaction dominated by the chemistry of perfluoro oxyradicals [10]. The composition and the reaction yields of forming PFPE polymers depend on irradiation condition, TFE concentration, fluid dynamics of the system and other classical physical parameters like temperature and pressure. Commonly, the average molecular weight of formed P-PFPEs (A) is more than 104 amu [11]. Carbonyl fluoride and tetrafluoroethylene oxide are the main by-products.

2.2. Deperoxidation of P-PFPEs

α,ω-Diacyl PFPE can be obtained by thermal treatment or chemical reduction of peroxide bonds present in the above mentioned peroxidic precursor. Under the appropriate thermal treatment, homolysis of fragile peroxide bonds in P-PFPEs (A) produces PFPE alkoxy radicals; subsequently, the cleavage of the bond in ß-position to the oxygen-centered radicals leads to the formation of reactive carbon-centered PFPE radicals [12,13]. The fast cage-combination reaction of these radicals takes place and leads to a PFPE material in which acyl fluoride and fluoroformyl moieties are nearly 50% of the end groups (Figure 2). Generally, above 150 °C those fluoroformate groups can also be converted into acyl fluorides. After the thermal treatment of the peroxidic PFPE, the reduced PFPE products can be distinguished into two fractions: The major one includes PFPE with monoacid end-groups, while the minor one comprises completely neutral (perfluoroalkyl end-groups) and diacyl fluoride PFPEs.
Applsci 02 00351 g002 1024
Figure 2. Deperoxidation of P-PFPEs by thermal treatment.
Figure 2. Deperoxidation of P-PFPEs by thermal treatment.
Applsci 02 00351 g002
P-PFPEs (A) can also be converted directly to diacyl fluoride PFPEs, F(O)CCF2O(CF2CF2)n(CF2O)mCF2C(O)F, by chemically induced reduction of the peroxide unites with better yield compared with thermal treatment (Figure 3). The chemical reduction is performed with reducing agents, such as hydrogen iodide or with molecular hydrogen in the presence of a noble metal catalyst (e.g., Palladium) [14].
Applsci 02 00351 g003 1024
Figure 3. Deperoxidation of P-PFPEs by chemical reduction.
Figure 3. Deperoxidation of P-PFPEs by chemical reduction.
Applsci 02 00351 g003

2.3. Preparation of DA-FPEs by DAF-PFPE Alkylation

Finally, hydrofluoropolyethers DA-FPEsare prepared through the reaction of diacyl fluoride PFPEs (DAF-PFPEs) with electrophiles in the presence of a source of fluorine ions, generally, metal fluorides. This process actually comprises two steps (Figure 4): Firstly, in aprotic polar solvent, DAF-PFPEs react with fluoride ions released from metal fluorides to form metal perfluoroalkoxides M+−OCF2RFCF2O−M+ as intermediates; secondly, metal perfluoroalkoxide is alkylated by a suitable alkylating agent X-RH leading to the introduction of alkoxy groups at the end of the perfluoropolyether chain.
Applsci 02 00351 g004 1024
Figure 4. General two step reaction for synthesis DA-FPEs.
Figure 4. General two step reaction for synthesis DA-FPEs.
Applsci 02 00351 g004
Metal perfluoroalkoxides are known as compounds characterized by low nucleophilicity [15] and they decompose into acylfluorides and metal fluorides, generally around room temperature. In order to increase the stability and the nucleophilic strength of these species, polar aprotic solvents (e.g., diglyme, tetraglyme) are generally required. The stability of these species depends on the nature of metal fluoride [16], temperature, and the solvent [17]. Metal perfluoroalkoxides are also important industrial intermediates in the synthesis of hypofluorites like CF3CF2OF [18] and fluorinated vinylethers [19,20]. Completely anhydrous reaction conditions are required, because in presence of water the hydrolysis of acyl fluoride groups generates hydrofluoric acid, HF, which can be absorbed by the solid metal fluoride giving MHF2 [16]. Because of the low nucleophilicity of perfluoroalkoxides, strong alkylating agents with high electrophilicity are needed to effectively react with metal perfluoroalkoxides and form DA-FPEs.

2.3.1. Alkylation of PFPE Dialkoxides

In the past years, there have been many disclosures reported on finding effective alkylating agents suitable for perfluoroalkoxides. Dialkylsulfate was one of the first specific reagents used [21], because of its strong alkylating ability. In fact, it has been used to alkylate almost every nucleophile [22,23], but the alkylating temperature of dialkylsulfate needs to be lower than 20 °C and undesired viscose gels can be formed at this temperature and remarkably reduce the alkylation rate and yield. Moreover, dialkyl sulfates are highly toxic and their carcinogenic activity makes them inapplicable for large-scale industrial production.
Applsci 02 00351 g005 1024
Figure 5. Alkyl ester of the polysulphonic PFPE.
Figure 5. Alkyl ester of the polysulphonic PFPE.
Applsci 02 00351 g005
Dialkyl sulfites and the alkyl ester of polysulphonic PFPE (Figure 5) were also proposed and applied as alkylating agents in reactions with acylfluorides to synthesize hydrofluoroethers (HFE) [6,24]. Compared with dialkyl sulfate, dialkyl sulphite and the alkyl ester of polysulphonic PFPE are considered non-carcinogenic, and their alkylating temperature over 100 °C avoids the formation of undesired gels. However, the molar yield of the product resulting from the use of these two alkylating agents is low (below 20%), in addition, the preparation of alkyl ester polysulphonic PFPE is particularly difficult.
Fluorovinyl alkyl ethers, (CF3)2C=CFO-RH, were also considered as one of the most effient but expensive class of alkylating agent for metal perfluoroalkoxides [25]. A high molar yield of HFEs was achieved by using heptafluoro-iso-butenyl methyl ether [26] in the reaction with metal perfluoroalkoxides, shown in Figure 6(a). A nonvolatile conjugated base (CF3)C=CO−FK+ was formed as by-product after the reaction that can be hydrolyzed into its carboxylic acid (CF3)2CHC(O)OH. Lastly, the carboxylic acid was decarboxylated with an aqueous base to form hexafluoropropane as another valuable product; this reaction is shown in Figure 6(b). Fluorovinyl alkyl ethers are commercially available products and they can also be prepared following the synthetic route described in Figure 6(c): The reaction between perfluoro-iso-butene (1) and a proper alcohol produces an octafluoro-iso-butyl alkyl ether (2) and by its subsequent dehydrofluorination the alkylating agent (3) and HF are synthesized.
Applsci 02 00351 g006 1024
Figure 6. (a) Reaction between DAF-PFPEs and fluorovinyl alkyl ethers; (b) Byproduct converted into hexafluoropropane; (c) Synthetic route for alkylating agent -fluorovinyl alkyl ethers.
Figure 6. (a) Reaction between DAF-PFPEs and fluorovinyl alkyl ethers; (b) Byproduct converted into hexafluoropropane; (c) Synthetic route for alkylating agent -fluorovinyl alkyl ethers.
Applsci 02 00351 g006
Newly developed alkylating agents which have strong a alkylating ability and less toxicity have been emerging in the past years, but these kinds of alkylating methods have an unavoidable common drawback: A stoichiometric amount of metal fluoride is usually needed to provide metal perfluoroalkoxides, and large amounts of partially reacted solid metal fluoride is left over after the reaction.

2.3.2. Catalytic Alkylation of Perfluoro(mono)acyl Fluorides and DAF-PFPE

A classical example of catalytic alkylation is the alkylation of perfluoroacyl fluorides performed by employing SbF5 as acid catalyst in anhydrous medium that reacts with alkyl fluoride to produce HFE (Figure 7). The first step in this pathway is the reaction of SbF5 with alkyl fluoride forming high valence metal SbF6–. The extra F ion from SbF6– attacks the carbonyl group of acyl fluorides forming alkoxides. Subsequently, the nucleophilic addition to in situ generated alkoxides produces the PFPE with alkoxy-group endings. In this reaction, work-up with a large amount of partially reacted metal fluoride is avoided; however, the drawback of this method is that the active acid catalyst may promote undesired isomerization or decomposition reactions and consequently deliver low or erratic yields [27].
Applsci 02 00351 g007 1024
Figure 7. Alkylation of acylfluorides with SbF5 as acid catalyst.
Figure 7. Alkylation of acylfluorides with SbF5 as acid catalyst.
Applsci 02 00351 g007
DA-PFPEs can be also successfully obtained via a novel synthetic route that consists in the reaction of DAF-PFPEs with alkyl fluoroformate (Figure 8) in the presence of a source of fluorine ions, generally metal fluoride (MF); the reaction can be regarded as catalytic alkylation of in situ generated PFPE dialkoxides.
Applsci 02 00351 g008 1024
Figure 8. Reaction between DAF-PFPEs and alkyl fluoroformate with metal fluoride as source fluorine ions.
Figure 8. Reaction between DAF-PFPEs and alkyl fluoroformate with metal fluoride as source fluorine ions.
Applsci 02 00351 g008
Table
Table 1. Preparation of selected DA-PFFEs through perfluoropolyether acylfluorides alkylation.
Table 1. Preparation of selected DA-PFFEs through perfluoropolyether acylfluorides alkylation.
AcylfluorideFluoroformateHFEConv.%Sel.%
z-DAF aCH3OC(O)FCH3O-(Z-PFPE)-OCH390100
z-DAF aCH3CH2OC(O)FCH3CH2O-(Z-PFPE)-OCH2CH396100
z-DAF aCH2=CHCH2O(O)FCH2=CHCH2O-(Z-PFPE)-OCH2CH=CH290100
a linear DAF-PFPE: FC(O)CF2O-(CF2CF2O)n(CF2O)m-CF2C(O)F (AMW 620 amu).
This fluoride-catalyzed fluoroformates alkylating reaction gives DA-PFPEs in good yield and CO2 is the only by-product. Due to the big differences of boiling points among alkyl fluoroformates, DAF-PFPE and DA-PFPEs, un-reacted alkylating reagents can be easily restored through a standard distillation. Alkyl fluoroformate can be methyl, ethyl as well as allyl fluoroformates. The great variety of fluoroformate alkylating reagents improves the utility of this straightforward alkylating reaction. Examples of several successfully employed fluoroformates, which reacted with high boiling point linear DAF-PFPE with good selectivity and yield are reported in Table 1 [28,29].
This catalytic alkoxides alkylation followed two supposed pathways (Figure 9): (a) A nucleophilic addition of the perfluoroalkoxide to alkyl fluoroformate directly forming the DA-FPE and CO2; or (b) through the carbonate intermediate, RFCFOC(O)ORH, followed by a second nucleophilic substitution to generate the corresponding products [28]. According to both pathways, the rearrangement of the fluoroformate group can release fluorides and replenish the perfluoro-alkyloxy-anions formation by reacting with a new acylfluoride. Therefore, alkyl fluoroformates can be applied not only as alkylating agents but also as an alternative fluorine ion source for the alkoxide formation.
Applsci 02 00351 g009 1024
Figure 9. Reaction mechanism for the synthesis of DM-FPEs. For clarity, here using Rf-C(O)F to represent DAF-PFPEs.
Figure 9. Reaction mechanism for the synthesis of DM-FPEs. For clarity, here using Rf-C(O)F to represent DAF-PFPEs.
Applsci 02 00351 g009
The alkyl fluoroformates are not commercially available and their synthesis comprises the reaction of carbonyl difluoride with alcohols at a low temperature in the presence of anhydrous sodium fluoride. The main by-products of their synthesis are alkyl carbonate, RHOC(O)ORH, and hydrogen fluoride. Alkyl carbonate is formed by further reaction of the forming methyl fluoroformate with alcohol. Hydrogen fluoride can be rapidly scavenged by sodium fluoride [30].

3. Chemical Physical Properties of α,ω-Dialkoxyperfluoropolyethers

One of the most representative classes of DA-FPEs is that of α,ω-dimethoxyfluoropolyethers (DM-FPEs) with the structure CH3O(CF2CF2O)n(CF2O)mCH3 (where the indices n and m define the random distribution of the related moieties content). In Table 2, the structures and molecular weights of four DM-FPEs samples are reported. The chemical structure is also identified by two digit numbers (i.e., 01, 02, 03 and 13): The first digit indicates the number of –CF2O– units and the second digit indicates the number of –CF2CF2O– units in the molecule.
Table
Table 2. Structure, molecular weight (MW) and purity of DM-FPEs samples.
Table 2. Structure, molecular weight (MW) and purity of DM-FPEs samples.
SampleStructureMSPurity (%, by GC)
DM01CH3OCF2CF2OCH316299.8
DM02CH3OCF2CF2OCF2CF2OCH327899.9
DM03CH3OCF2CF2OCF2CF2OCF2CF2OCH339499.0
DM13CH3OCF2CF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2CF2OCH346096.8

3.1. Boiling Point

The boiling points (b.p.) of DM-FPEs are reported in Figure 10 as a function of the number of backbone chain atoms (N), i.e., carbon plus oxygen atoms. They increase regularly with N. In Figure 10, DM-FPEs boiling points are also compared with those of α,ω-dihydrofluoroethers (HFEs) [31] and perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) [32].
Applsci 02 00351 g010 1024
Figure 10. Boiling points as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs (□) and PFPEs (○).
Figure 10. Boiling points as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs (□) and PFPEs (○).
Applsci 02 00351 g010
The highest boiling points are those of DM-FPEs, the intermediates are HFEs and the lowest ones are PFPEs. The above-mentioned result reflects the typical low intermolecular interactions of perfluorinated compounds. Partially fluorinated ethers, like HFEs and DM-FPEs, display higher boiling temperatures and this is indicative of greater intermolecular polar interactions [11].
Considering three similar fluoromethylethers, CF3OCF3 (b.p. 214 K; μ = 0.49 D), CF2HOCF3 (b.p. 238 K, μ = 1.18 D) and CH3OCF3 (b.p. 250 K, μ = 2.56 D), the boiling points and the dipole moments have analogous tendencies [33]. The progressive substitution of fluorine atoms with hydrogen in the methoxy end caps leads to a stronger dipole and consequently, to an increase of the boiling point, as shown in Figure 10. The boiling point differences between PFPEs and HFEs and between PFPEs and DM­FPEs are not constant but decrease continuously with the chain length. Since the attractive forces are due to polar terminal groups, their relative intensity decreases as N increases and, as a result, the boiling points of HFEs, DM-FPEs and PFPE tend to an asymptote at higher N values.

3.2. Density

A comparison of the specific volume (Vsp) at 298 K of DM-FPEs, HFEs and PFPEs series is shown in Figure 11. The DM-FPEs sequence shows the highest specific volume and the PFPEs the lowest at identical number of chain atoms, N. The Vsp of PFPEs is almost constant and independent of N. The specific volumes of DM-FPEs and HFEs decrease continuously to a plateau that approximately coincides with the constant Vsp of PFPEs. This behavior can also be explained on the basis of the differences between terminal groups. Moving from –CF3 to –CF2H and to –CH3, the molecular weight of the groups diminishes; on the contrary, the variation of volume is less noticeable because the Van der Waals radii of fluorine and hydrogen are similar [34]: 0.147 and 0.12 nm, respectively. Consequently, the difference in specific volume between the three series is mainly due to the variation of molecular weight, explaining the tendencies of Vsp observed in Figure 11. Furthermore, as the weight fraction of the chain ends decreases with N, it is logical that the specific volume of HFEs and DM­FPEs tends to the Vsp values of PFPEs when the chain is sufficiently long.
Applsci 02 00351 g011 1024
Figure 11. Specific volume at 298 K as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs(□) and PFPEs (○).
Figure 11. Specific volume at 298 K as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs(□) and PFPEs (○).
Applsci 02 00351 g011

3.3. Vapor Pressure and Vaporization Enthalpy

The vapor pressure data, plotted as Clausius-Clapeyron equation in Figure 12, show a deviation from linearity at low temperatures, which is common for many oligomeric substances. Vaporization enthalpies (ΔHv) are also derived from the Clausius-Clapeyron plot in the range of temperatures in which the function is linear.
The ΔHv data of DM-FPEs, reported as a function of number of chain atoms, N, are compared with those of HFEs and PFPEs in Figure 13. These data indicate the highest values for DM-FPEs, intermediate for HFEs and the lowest for PFPEs. As the effect of the polar terminal groups (–OCF2H and –OCH3) diminishes with the length of the chain, ΔHv also decreases and tends to the values of PFPEs when N is above 15 [4].
Applsci 02 00351 g012 1024
Figure 12. Clausius–Clapeyron plot for DM-FPEs: DM01 (×), DM02 (□), DM03 (○) and DM13 (Δ). (See also Table 2 for detailed composition of these DM-FPEs samples.)
Figure 12. Clausius–Clapeyron plot for DM-FPEs: DM01 (×), DM02 (□), DM03 (○) and DM13 (Δ). (See also Table 2 for detailed composition of these DM-FPEs samples.)
Applsci 02 00351 g012
Applsci 02 00351 g013 1024
Figure 13. Vaporization enthalpy, ΔHv, as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs (□) and PFPEs (○).
Figure 13. Vaporization enthalpy, ΔHv, as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×), HFEs (□) and PFPEs (○).
Applsci 02 00351 g013

3.4. Refractive Index

The refractive indices of the series DM-FPEs and HFEs plotted as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, indicate two opposed behaviors (Figure 14). In particular the refractive index n increases for DM-FPEs and decreases for HFEs. In both cases, increasing the chain length, the refractive indices tend to a plateau value, close to the characteristic refractive index of linear PFPEs (1.290–1.295) [11]. The tendencies of DM-FPEs and HFEs refractive indices are mainly due to the terminal groups that contribute to n in an opposite way. As reported in the literature, the group influence of –OCH3 is higher than that of –OCF3, while that of –OCF2H is lower [35].
Applsci 02 00351 g014 1024
Figure 14. Refractive index (n) at 293 K as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×) and HFEs (□), and the range of refractive index of linear PFPEs.
Figure 14. Refractive index (n) at 293 K as a function of the number of chain atoms, N, for DM-FPEs (×) and HFEs (□), and the range of refractive index of linear PFPEs.
Applsci 02 00351 g014

4. Atmospheric Chemistry of DA-FPEs

The absence of chlorine atoms in HFEs makes them possess a negligible ozone depleting potential (ODP), but the presence of C-F and C-O bonds may absorb in the terrestrial infrared radiation region (800–1200 cm−1), and could play a significant role as a greenhouse gas. Therefore, considerable attention has been paid in recent years to perform both experimental and theoretical studies on atmospheric chemistry of HFEs. However, surprisingly, only relatively little information about DA-FPEs has been reported [36,37]. Since the only available data on DA-FPEs compounds are related to DM-FPEs with structure CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 that only contain the –(CF2CF2O)– units, the discussion has been focused prevalently on the atmospheric chemistry of these compounds.

4.1. Atmospheric Lifetimes and Decomposition Mechanism of α,ω-Dialkoxyperfluoropolyethers

In 2004, the first understanding of the atmospheric chemistry for DM-FPEs was achieved by studying the kinetics and mechanism of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 (n = 1–3) oxidation which is initiated by Cl atoms and OH radicals in the atmosphere; the impact of their degradation products on the climate were also discussed [1]. Like most organic compounds, the primary tropospheric degradation of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 is mainly dominated by the attack of OH radicals [38]. Understanding of reaction kinetics is essential for the evaluation of the atmospheric lifetime of these molecules. In addition to the reaction with hydroxyl radicals (OH), organic compounds can also be removed from the atmosphere via photolysis, wet deposition, and reaction with NO3 radicals, Cl atoms, and O3 [38,39,40]. For saturated compounds such as CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3, reactions with NO3 radicals and O3 are typically too slow to be of importance [1]. The average concentration of Cl atoms in the troposphere is orders of magnitude less than that of OH radicals [41]. Reaction with Cl atoms will be a less significant atmospheric loss mechanism. Since ethers do not absorb at UV wavelengths > 200 nm, photolytic sink will be not be an important degradation pathway [42] either. Highly fluorinated molecules, such as CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3, are hydrophobic and wet deposition is unlikely to be of importance. In conclusion, the atmospheric lifetime of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 is determined by its reaction with OH.
Smog chambers equipped with FTIR spectrometers were used to study the Cl atom and OH radical initiated oxidation of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 in 720 Torr of air at 296.3 K. Relative rate methods were used to measure k(Cl+CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3)) = 3.7 (±0.7) × 10−13and k(OH+CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3) = 2.9 (± 0.5) × 10−14 cm3 molecule−1·s−1. The relative rate method is widely used to measure the reactivity of OH radicals with organic compounds [43]. The hydrogen abstraction reaction from the terminal groups has been assumed, according to established literature data, as the rate-determining step for the decomposition of the entire molecule [44]. It is well known that –CF2CF2– units are unreactive toward Cl and OH radicals. Thus, the reactivity of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 is confined to the C–H bonds on either end-groups of the molecule. Indeed, appropriate studies showed that the reactivity of the methyl group did not change noticeably by increasing the number n of –(CF2CF2O)– units from 1 to 3 [45]. Nevertheless, the average concentration of Cl atoms in the troposphere is orders of magnitude less than that of OH radicals [41]. Thus, knowing the k(OH+CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3)s rate constant, the DM-FPEs atmospheric lifetime has been evaluated to be two years [1].
Tuazon et al. claimed that in air the oxidation of HFEs with difluoromethoxy ending groups, OCF2H, like HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H, HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H, and HCF2OCF2OCF2H, gives C(O)F2 as the only carbon-containing product [46]. For DM-PFEs which end with methoxy-groups, fluoroformates CH3O(CF2CF2O)nC(O)H were recognized as the only oxidation decomposition products with a 100% yield; the formed fluoroformates can be further oxidized to di-formates H(O)CO(CF2CF2O)nC(O)H [1]. Concerning the impacts of fluoroformates on the climate, since fluorinated esters are known to be easily hydrolyzed [46,47], it is usually assumed that they can be easily removed though wet deposition; therefore Andersen et al. [1] deduced that formate CH3O(CF2CF2O)nC(O)H is not expected to be persistent or pose any significant environmental hazard. However, Bravo et al. [48] assumed that the highly fluorinated nature of fluoroformates may decrease their solubility in water and could contribute a significant indirect GWP. Up to now, due to the lack of experimental data like gas-to-water equilibrium and solubility test of fluoroformates, it is still unclear how rapidly fluoroformates will be removed via uptake and hydrolysis in rain/cloud/seawater [49]. Further experimental examinations are needed for the determination of the atmospheric implication of fluoroformats.

4.2. Global Warming Potential

In 1995, Pinnock et al. outlined a method to determine the instantaneous forcings (IF) from the IR absorption spectra such as those reported in Figure 14. As the values of GWP can be estimated on the basis of the IF, in Table 3 GWP relative to carbon dioxide of DM-FPEs at 100 year time horizons has been reported, and the comparison with other greenhouse gases, such as CF3Cl (CFC-11), CF2HOCF3 (HFE125), CH3OCF3 (HFE143a) and other HFEs, is reported in Table 3.
Table
Table 3. Atmospheric lifetimes and global warming potential (GWP relative to carbon dioxide) of DM-FPEs, CFC and HFE.
Table 3. Atmospheric lifetimes and global warming potential (GWP relative to carbon dioxide) of DM-FPEs, CFC and HFE.
IF(W·m−2·ppb−1)Lifetime(y)GWP 100 yearsTime horizonReference
CFCl3 (CFC11)0.25454750IPCC/TEAP
CF2HOCF3 (HFE125)0.4413614900IPCC/TEAP
CH3OCF3 (HFE143a)0.274.3756IPCC/TEAP
C4F9OCH3(HFE-7100)0.315390[50]
HCF2OCF2H0.4011.33699[8,9]
HCF2OCF2OCF2H0.6612.12700[50]
HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H0.876.21500[50]
HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H1.376.31840[8,9]
CH3OCH30.0200.0150.3[41,42]
DM010.322230[1]
DM020.612270[1]
DM030.832250[1]
Applsci 02 00351 g015 1024
Figure 15. Infrared spectra of CH3OCF2CF2OCH3 (A), CH3O(CF2CF2O)2CH3 (B), and CH3O(CF2CF2O)3CH3 (C).
Figure 15. Infrared spectra of CH3OCF2CF2OCH3 (A), CH3O(CF2CF2O)2CH3 (B), and CH3O(CF2CF2O)3CH3 (C).
Applsci 02 00351 g015
It is evident from Table 3 that DM-FPEs have relatively high instantaneous forcing (IF) but much lower GWPs, if compared with CFC11 and HFE compounds. In addition, the higher the number of –(CF2CF2O)– units, the higher the absorption in the 800–1200 cm−1 range, that is responsible for the high IF. Thus the reason of the mitigation of DM-FPEs GWP is mostly due to their short atmospheric lifetimes and the emission of DM-FPEs into the atmosphere should not contribute significantly to the climate change.
On the basis of the data of DM-FPEs which contain only –(CF2CF2O)– units and the studies on series of HFPE with –CF2H end-groups [51], it seems reasonable to expect that the reactivity of C–H bonds is independent from the number of -CF2O- units in the DM-FPE molecule. However, there are no available kinetic data for DM-FPEs with structure CH3O(CF2CF2O)n(CF2O)mCH3 to confirm this assumption.
In addition, DM-FPE commercial products are mixtures of homologous copolymers with similar lengths but different unites, i.e., different n and m; further experimental studies are most likely necessary for a better understanding of the effects of the (CF2CF2O)n/(CF2O)m ratio on atmospheric chemistry of DM-FPEs.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the generous support from Solvay-Solexis Fluorine Chemistry Chair contributed to this study.

References

  1. Andersen, M.P.S.; Hurley, M.D.; Wallington, T.J.; Blandini, F.N.; Jensen, R.; Librando, V.; Hjorth, J.; Marchionni, G.; Avataneo, M.; Visca, M.; et al. Atmospheric chemistry of CH3O(CF2CF2O)nCH3 (n = 1–3): Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation initiated by Cl atoms and OH radicals, IR spectra, and global warming potentials. Phys.Chem. A 2004, 108, 1964–1972. [Google Scholar]
  2. WMO (World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project; Report No. 47. Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
  3. Wallington, T.J.; Schneider, W.F.; Sehested, J.; Bilde, M.; Platz, J.; Nielsen, O.J.; Molina, M.J. Atmospheric chemistry of HFE-7100 (C4F9OCH3): Kinetics of its reaction with OH radicals, UV spectra and kinetic data for C4F9OCH2• and C4F9OCH2O2• radicals, and the atmospheric fate of C4F9OCH2O• radicals. J. Phys. Chem.A 1997, 101, 8264–8274. [Google Scholar]
  4. Marchionni, G.; Avataneo, M.; de Patto, U.; Maccone, P.; Pezzin, G. Physical properties of four alpha-omega-dimethoxyfluoropolyethers. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 465–473. [Google Scholar]
  5. Marchionni, G.; de Patto, U.; Avataneo, M. Liquid-liquid extraction of polar organic substances from their aqueous solutions with fluorinated extracting liquids. European Patent Application EP 1346757 A, 24 September 2003. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marchionni, G.; Visca, M. Perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) having at least an alkylether end group and respective preparation process. European Patent Application. EP 1275678, 23 April 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Marchionni, G.; Petricci, S.; Guarda, P.A.; Spataro, G.; Pezzin, G. The comparison of thermal stability of some hydrofluoroethers and hydrofluoropolyethers. J. Fluor. Chem. 2004, 125, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marchionni, G.; Maccone, P.; Pezzin, G. Thermodynamic and other physical properties of several hydrofluoro-compounds. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002, 118, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Malavasi, M.; Sianesi, D. Novelties and prospects in the synthesis of perfluoropolyethers by oxidative polymerization of fluoroolefins. J. Fluor. Chem. 1999, 95, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guarda, P.A.; Barchiesi, E.; Fontana, G.; Petricci, S.; Pianca, M.; marchionni, G. Peroxidic perfluoropolyether from tetrafluoroethylene oxidation: Micro structural analysis by NMR spectroscopy and mechanistic considerations. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sianesi, D.; Marchionni, G.; de Pasquale, R.J. Perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) from perfluoroolefin photooxidation: Fomblin® and Galden® fluids. In Organofluorine Chemistry Principles and Commercial Applications; Bank, R.E., Smart, R.E., Tatlow, J.C., Eds.; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 431–457. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sansotera, M.; Navarrini, W.; Gola, M.; Bianchi, L.C.; Wormald, P.; Famulari, A.; Avataneo, M. Peroxidic perfluoropolyether for the covalent binding of perfluoropolyether chains on carbon black surface. J. Fluor. Chem. 2011, 132, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Navarrini, W.; Venturini, F.; Sansotera, M.; Ursini, M.; Metrangolo, P.; Resnati, G.; Galimberti, E.; Barchiesi, E.; Dardani, P. The use of perfluoroalkyl hypofluorites for an efficient synthesis of perfluorinated ethers characterized by low Ostwald coefficient. J. Fluor. Chem. 2008, 129, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sianesi, D.; Caporiccio, G. Sulphonic derivatives having the structure of polyoxapoly fluoroalkanes. U.S. Patent, 3,847,978, 23 December 1974. [Google Scholar]
  15. Prakash, G.K.S.; Hu, J.; Olah, G.A. Alkylation of in situ generated fluorinated alkoxides: Novel synthesis of partially fluorinated ethers. Arkivoc SD-369C 2003, 104–119. [Google Scholar]
  16. Evans, F.W.; Litt, M.H.; Weidler-Kubanee, A.M.; Avonda, F.P. Formation of adducts between fluorinated ketones and metal fluorides. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 1837–1839. [Google Scholar]
  17. Parker, A.J. The effects of solvation on the properties of anions in dipolar aprotic solvents. Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1962, 16, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lerman, O.; Rozen, S. Novel method for introduction of the perfluoroethoxy group using elemental fluorine. Synthesis and chemistry of fluoroxypentafluoroethane. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4122–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Navarrini, W.; Tortelli, V.; Russo, A.; Corti, S. Organic hypofluorites and their new role in industrial fluorine chemistry. J. Fluor. Chem. 1999, 95, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feiring, E.A.; Wonchoba, R.E.; Rozen, S. Synthesis of partially fluorinated monomers and polymers for ion-exchange resins. J. Fluor. Chem. 1999, 93, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Croix, L.S.; Szur, A.J. Ether compounds as inhalant anesthetics. U.S. Patent, 3,962,460, 8 June 1976. [Google Scholar]
  22. Paquette, L.A. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995; pp. 2132–2135. [Google Scholar]
  23. Suter, C.M. The Organic Chemistry of Sulfur; Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1944; pp. 48–74. [Google Scholar]
  24. Marchionni, G.; Mario, V. PFPEs having at least an alkylether end group and respective preparation process. U.S. Patent 7,488,852, 10 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lamanna, W.M.; Flynn, R.M.; Vitcak, D.R.; Qiu, Z.-M. Catalytic process for making hydrofluoroethers. PCT WO 9947480. 23 September 1999. [Google Scholar]
  26. Behr, F.E.; Cheburkov, Y. Process for preparing hydrofluoroethers. U.S. Patent, 6,023,002, 8 February 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lamanna, W.M.; Flynn, R.M.; Vitcak, D.R.; Qiu, Z.-M. Catalytic process for making hydrofluoroethers. U.S. Patent 6,046,368, 4 April 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Galimberti, M.; Fontana, G.; Resnati, G.; Navarrini, W. New catalytic alkylation of in situ generated perfluoro-alkyloxy-anions and perfluoro-carbanions. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 1578–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Navarrini, W.; Galimberti, M.; Fontana, G. Process for preparing hydrofluoroethers. European patent application EP 1462434A, 16 application 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Klauke, E. Braden, R. Fluoroformates. GB 1216639. 23 December 1970. [Google Scholar]
  31. Marchionni, G.; Bassi, M.; Fontana, G.; Maccone, P. Ajroldi, J. Some physical chemical properties of alpha-omega dihydroperfluoropolyethers. J. Fluor. Chem. 1999, 98, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marchionni, G.; Ajroldi, G.; Righetti, M.C.; Pezzin, G. Molecular interactions in perfluorinated and hydrogenated compounds: Linear paraffins and ethers. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marchionni, G.; Avataneo, M.; de Patto, U.; Maccone, P.; Pezzin, G. Physical properties of four alpha-omega dimethoxyfluoropolyethers. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 465–473. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bondi, A. Van der waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Le, T.D.; Weers, J.G. Group contribution-additivity and quantum mechanical models for predicting the molar refractions, indexes of refraction, and boiling points of fluorochemicals. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 13909–13916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blowers, P.; Moline, D.M.; Tetrault, K.F.; Wheeler, R.R.; Tuchawena, S.L. Prediction of radiative forcing values for hydrofluoroethers using density functional theory methods. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blowers, P.; Moline, D.M.; Tetrault, K.F.; Wheeler, R.R.; Tuchawena, S.L. Global warming potentials of hydrofluoroethers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar]
  38. Blanco, M.B.; Teruel, M.A. Atmospheric degradation of fluoroesters (FESs): Gas-phase reactivity study towards OH radicals at 298 K. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 7330–7338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Blanco, M.B.; Bejan, I.; Barnes, I.; Wiesen, P.; Teruel, M.A. Kinetics of the reactions of chlorine atoms with selected fluoroacetates at atmospheric pressure and 298 K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 453, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hudlicky, M. Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds, 2nd ed; Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK, 1976; pp. 255–257. [Google Scholar]
  41. Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.; Pitts, J.N., Jr. Atmospheric Chemistry: Fundamentals and Experimental Techniques; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  42. Calvert, J.G.; Pitts, J.N., Jr. Photochemistry; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  43. Atkinson, R.; Baulch, D.L.; Cox, R.A.; Crowley, J.N.; Hampson, R.F.; Hynes, R.G.; Jenkin, M.E.; Rossi, M.J.; Troe, J.; Wallington, T.J. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume IV—Gas phase reactions of organic halogen species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 4141–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. AFEAS Workshop, Kinetics and Mechanisms for the Reaction of Halogenated Organic Compounds in the Troposphere; AFEAS Workshop: Dublin, Ireland, 1993.
  45. Pinnock, S.; Hurley, M.D.; Shine, K.P.; Wallington, T.J.; Smyth, T.J. Radiative forcing of climate by hydrochloroflurocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1995, 100, 23227–23238. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bunyard, W.C.; Kadla, J.F.; de Simone, M.S. Viscosity effects on the thermal decomposition of bis(perfluoro-2-N-propoxypropionyl) peroxide in dense carbon dioxide and fluorinated solvents. J. Am. Chem. 2001, 123, 7199–7206. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sansotera, M.; Bianchi, C.L.; Lecardi, G.; Marchionni, G.; Metrangolo, P. Resnati, G.; Navarrini, W. Highly hydrophobic carbon black obtained by covalent linkage of perfluorocarbon and perfluoropolyether chains on the carbon surface. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4498–4504. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bravo, I.; Diaz-de-mera, Y.; Aranda, A.; Moreno, E.; Nutt, D.R.; Marston, G. Radiative efficiencies for fluorinated esters: Indirect global warming potentials of hydrofluoroethers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 17185–17193. [Google Scholar]
  49. Javadiando, S.M.; Nielsen, J.; Wallington, J.T.; Hurley, D.A.; Owens, G.J. Atmospheric chemistry of n-butanol: kinetics, mechanisms, and products of Cl atom and OH radical initiated oxidation in the presence and absence of NO(x). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 7389–7395. [Google Scholar]
  50. IPCC, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  51. Wallington, T.J.; Hurley, M.D.; Nielsen, O.J. The radiative efficiency of HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (Galden® PFPEs) revisited. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, M.; Navarrini, W.; Spataro, G.; Venturini, F.; Sansotera, M. An Environmentally Friendly Class of Fluoropolyether: α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers. Appl. Sci. 2012, 2, 351-367. https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020351

AMA Style

Wu M, Navarrini W, Spataro G, Venturini F, Sansotera M. An Environmentally Friendly Class of Fluoropolyether: α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers. Applied Sciences. 2012; 2(2):351-367. https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Menghua, Walter Navarrini, Gianfranco Spataro, Francesco Venturini, and Maurizio Sansotera. 2012. "An Environmentally Friendly Class of Fluoropolyether: α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers" Applied Sciences 2, no. 2: 351-367. https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020351

APA Style

Wu, M., Navarrini, W., Spataro, G., Venturini, F., & Sansotera, M. (2012). An Environmentally Friendly Class of Fluoropolyether: α,ω-Dialkoxyfluoropolyethers. Applied Sciences, 2(2), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020351

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop