This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Research Progress on Energy Consumption Throughout the Life Cycle of Machine Tools
by
Cong Ma
Cong Ma 1,2,3,
Zhifeng Liu
Zhifeng Liu 1,*,
Xiaojun Ding
Xiaojun Ding 3,4 and
Yang Gao
Yang Gao 2,3
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2
College of Mechatronic Engineering, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China
3
Engineering Research Center for Hybrid Manufacturing System, Yinchuan 750021, China
4
School of Electromechanic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 1462; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031462 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 December 2025
/
Revised: 17 January 2026
/
Accepted: 21 January 2026
/
Published: 31 January 2026
Abstract
Machine tools are the major consumers of industrial energy, but their energy efficiency remains low, posing a serious challenge to sustainable manufacturing. The current literature predominantly focuses on isolated subsystems or specific operational phases (e.g., cutting parameters), lacking systematic evaluations of how different methodologies interact within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework. This paper provides a critical synthesis of three core methodologies—modeling methods, system parameter optimization, and machine learning (ML)—across the design/production, usage, and recycling stages. Unlike descriptive reviews, this study highlights the scientific contribution by defining the applicability boundaries and complementary mechanisms of these approaches. The analysis reveals that while modeling lays the theoretical basis for eco-design and remanufacturing assessments, and optimization effectively resolves multi-objective trade-offs, these static methods struggle with the dynamic complexity of real-time operations where ML excels. However, ML is identified to be constrained by high data dependency and poor generalization in heterogeneous environments. Consequently, this review shows that the ‘cross-application’ of modeling methods and machine learning to construct hybrid models is essential for addressing complex nonlinear relationships and achieving accurate energy prediction throughout the entire life cycle. Finally, future directions such as transfer learning and digital twins are proposed to overcome current generalization bottlenecks, providing a theoretical foundation for the industry’s transition from passive energy assessment to active, intelligent energy management.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ma, C.; Liu, Z.; Ding, X.; Gao, Y.
Research Progress on Energy Consumption Throughout the Life Cycle of Machine Tools. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 1462.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031462
AMA Style
Ma C, Liu Z, Ding X, Gao Y.
Research Progress on Energy Consumption Throughout the Life Cycle of Machine Tools. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(3):1462.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031462
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ma, Cong, Zhifeng Liu, Xiaojun Ding, and Yang Gao.
2026. "Research Progress on Energy Consumption Throughout the Life Cycle of Machine Tools" Applied Sciences 16, no. 3: 1462.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031462
APA Style
Ma, C., Liu, Z., Ding, X., & Gao, Y.
(2026). Research Progress on Energy Consumption Throughout the Life Cycle of Machine Tools. Applied Sciences, 16(3), 1462.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031462
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.