Next Article in Journal
PROMPT-BART: A Named Entity Recognition Model Applied to Cyber Threat Intelligence
Previous Article in Journal
Standard Reference Thermoelectric Modules Based on Metallic Combinations and Geometric Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
Koffka Ring Perception in Digital Environments with Brightness Modulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Findings in Visual Communications on Visibility or Legibility in Different Media

by
Klementina Možina
1,* and
Maja Brozović
2
1
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Faculty of Graphic Arts, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 10274; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810274
Submission received: 17 September 2025 / Accepted: 18 September 2025 / Published: 22 September 2025

1. Introduction

The visibility and legibility of graphic elements and typography in different colours are crucial for the rapid absorption and processing of information, the speed of which depends on typography and graphic design. The development and usability of these elements can be seen in both conventional print products and modern digital media.
Recent developments in the field of printed media have focussed primarily on packaging for protection, sales and transport, with a particular focus on sustainable materials and increasing consumers ecological awareness [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. At the same time, there have been significant developments in the field of graphic design, including the eco-friendly design of packaging [8,9,10,11,12,13] and the application of various labels with additional information for consumers or users [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Today, attracting potential customers is an important part of graphic design development.
Traditional print products such as books, magazines, newspapers and various information sources are increasingly being replaced by digital media [20,21,22,23,24]. An increasing amount of educational content is being delivered via modern media [25,26,27,28], often supplemented by additional material such as videos that enhance the educational experience. There are recognised developments in typographic and graphic adaptations that help people with various reading difficulties [29,30,31,32,33].
Currently, social games that can be educational, promote thinking and memory, or simply facilitate human interaction and communication are being published in modern media [34,35,36].
Studies in these areas are presented in this Special Issue of Applied Sciences and described as follows.

2. Overview of Published Articles

The first article [37] focuses on eco-friendly graphic design of gift packaging, including design solutions for bottle labelling. Eco-friendly and sustainable design focuses primarily on the use of material and the design of packaging sizes and formats to technologically simplify their production, including the minimisation of waste materials. In addition to ecological materials, design elements of bottle labelling, gift packaging for bottles and general graphic solutions were also considered in the aforementioned research. The latter can have an impact on production costs, user experience and the quality of compostability or impurity in recycled materials. The research presented four design solutions for labels, all containing a QR code, three different design solutions for gift packaging and their two labelling. All were based on minimalist design principles (less is more) in terms of colour usage and printed surface. The study analysed the user experience of different age and income groups (over 200 respondents in total) and four different focus groups based on their role: tourist board, company representatives, potential buyers and students.
Older user groups were found to be more discerning in their choice of graphic design and this affected their product purchases. Younger user groups were more receptive to the use of QR codes and the information accessible through them.
Another study [38] analysed the use of NFC tags on packaging. The level of awareness of this tag was surveyed among more than 160 participants, with understanding tested among more than 30 participants. A focus group of 50 participants tested the visibility of NFC tag placement using eye-tracking devices.
The results showed that older survey participants (Baby Boomers) were not familiar with the meaning of NFC tags. Middle-aged readers (Generation X) recognised and understood the meaning of the tag to a lesser extent. The younger groups (Generation Y and Z) were familiar with the tag and easily searched for more information. The results on the positioning of the NFC tag differed from the general recommendations; ideally, the tag should be located at the bottom right, where it is most noticeable. This research found that the bottom left position is the most preferable, although there may be geographical differences, warranting further research in this direction.
The next article [39] examines the legibility of text in different colour combinations and across different media, i.e., print and digital. The reading speed in the digital medium was measured using an eye-tracking device. In the study, three colour combinations of text and background were tested with 52 participants.
The results showed that the fastest combination to read was the achromatic–chromatic combination, i.e., black text on a green background. Slower reading speeds were found for the achromatic combination, i.e., black text on a light grey background, and the chromatic combination, i.e., purple text on a green background. The research found no statistically significant differences between the media, i.e., between printed text and text on a screen. The medium also had no influence on the understanding of the content presented. As most information today is presented in a variety of colour combinations, it is likely that further research will be conducted in this area.
Another study [40] investigated the effects of graphic design and the media used to display instructions for task completion/performance among high school students. The graphic design varied in terms of typography, colour and layout. At the same time, the user-friendliness of the different display media (conventional and digital) was analysed. In the case of the digital media, both the projection and the close-up display on a computer screen were tested. The study was divided into two parts. In the first experiment, in which 125 students took part, the focus was on the variety of typography, colour and design of the instructions. The second experiment, in which 75 students took part, investigated the influence of the presentation of the instructions and the medium used to complete the tasks. In the second part: one group received the instructions on a computer screen and completed the tasks on a tablet. Another group received the instructions projected onto a blackboard and completed the tasks on paper. The third group received printed instructions and completed the tasks on paper.
The differences in terms of typography and choice of colour were not statistically significant. However, it was found that black text was read more quickly than coloured text. Statistically significant results showed an advantage of printed instructions, regardless of the colour combination, over digital ones. Serif typefaces were read faster on paper than on screen. The same applies to sans-serif typefaces. Instructions written exclusively in capital letters were read the slowest.
Colours and represent the basis of graphic design and can help us recognise and understand information more quickly. Colour psychology explains how humans experience their perception [41]. In one study [42], the recognition of grey tone variations in the Koffka ring in conjunction with different combinations of background colours (red, blue, green) on a computer screen was investigated. Twenty-seven test patterns were created with a colour combination of primary and secondary stimuli. The intensity of the effect was measured by the difference in brightness between light, medium grey and dark grey tones. The visual study was conducted with 60 test subjects from a mixed population with an average age of 22 years (Generation Z).
The visual effect of the simultaneous contrast evoked by the Koffka ring varies considerably depending on the brightness of the stimuli, the design variant of the ring and the background colour. The strongest visual effect was observed at the dark grey tones of the Koffka ring on blue/green and red/green backgrounds. In contrast, the effect was weak for the red/blue background at all brightness levels. The results have important implications for the design of digital media, where the understanding of these effects can help avoid unintended colour distortions caused by a simultaneous contrast.
Board games can have a positive effect on memory, although care should be taken not to use typefaces that are illegible or too small [43]. The research [44] compared the user experience (i.e., player experience—PX) of traditional, i.e., printed, and digital games. It compared the board game Monopoly and the card game Uno. A total of 100 players took part in the study. The majority of players (55%) were under the age of 24 (Generation Z), and 21% were young adults under the age of 30 (Generation Z and Y).
The results showed some differences in the design solutions between the physical and updated digital versions of the games. In the digital version of Monopoly, players were more satisfied with the design of the game tokens. However, statistically significant results indicated that the physical version of Monopoly provided a better player experience (PX). In Uno, the colour scheme was changed more in the digital version than in the classic playing cards. Nevertheless, the results showed a statistically significant preference for physical playing cards. In addition, the digital game eliminates direct human interaction and communication. The desire for direct communication and social interaction still seems to be prevalent in board games.

3. Conclusions

Looking at information in the context of societal changes brought about by new visual communication media, especially in relation to overlapping age boundaries between generations, can shed light on the information consumption habits of different age groups. Each generation is born into an era characterised by a particular technology or medium. At the same time, the same generation begins to develop a new form of media; however, the majority often does not keep up with the new technologies and instead remains loyal to the media that is already familiar. Given the ageing population [45,46], research targeting this audience will be crucial not only in terms of raising awareness of modern graphic design elements that enhance packaging and print, but also in terms of the presentation of information in digital media. Many previous studies have shown that legibility is better in printed media than in digital formats. Therefore, further research in this area is crucial. To ensure tangible and credible results, such studies must include sufficiently large test groups. Objective methods, such as eye-tracking technology, should also be used. In addition to testing typographical adaptations, graphic elements and the overall design must also be adapted to the needs of older population groups. For educational purposes, close scrutiny is required across different age groups, i.e., from children and teenagers to students, as well as for those with specific reading difficulties. In the area of packaging, further development will undoubtedly focus on ecological and sustainable materials and the corresponding technologies. There will also be advances in ecological design and additional elements that provide additional or detailed information.
There is no doubt that the wide field of graphic design is dynamic, evolving and requires continuous detailed research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, K.M. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.; writing—review and editing, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oloyede, O.O.; Lignou, S. Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging: A Consumer’s Perspective. Foods 2021, 10, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vila-Lopez, N.; Küster-Boluda, I. A bibliometric analysis on packaging research: Towards sustainable and healthy packages. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 684–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ibrahim, I.D.; Hamam, Y.; Sadiku, E.R.; Ndambuki, J.M.; Kupolati, W.K.; Jamiru, T.; Eze, A.A.; Snyman, J. Need for Sustainable Packaging: An Overview. Polymers 2022, 14, 4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vrabič Brodnjak, U. Bio-based adhesives formulated from tannic acid, chitosan, and shellac for packaging materials. Polymers 2023, 15, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hussain, S.; Akhter, R.; Maktedar, S.S. Advancements in sustainable food packaging: From eco-friendly materials to innovative technologies. Sustain. Food Technol. 2024, 2, 1297–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vrabič Brodnjak, U.; Jestratijevic, I. The future of baby cosmetics packaging and sustainable development: A look at sustainable materials and packaging innovations—A systematic review. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 32, 2208–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Branca, G.; Resciniti, R.; Babin, B.J. Sustainable packaging design and the consumer perspective: A systematic literature review. Ital. J. Mark. 2024, 12, 77–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Georgakarakou, C.; Riskos, K.; Tsourvakas, G.; Yfantidou, I. What features of green products packaging are more eye catching; an eye-tracking exploratory study about organic agricultural products. J. Technol. Mark. 2020, 14, 93–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ilich, K.L.; Hardey, M. It’s all about the packaging: Investigation of the motivations, intentions, and marketing implications of sharing photographs of secondary packaging on Instagram. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2020, 23, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y. Analysis of Visual Communication Packaging Design Based on Interactive Experience. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1852, 022074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shukla, P.; Singh, J.; Wang, W. The influence of creative packaging design on customer motivation to process and purchase decisions. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 147, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kolisnyk, O.; Hovhannisyan, S.; Pasko, O.; Khynevych, R.; Slityuk, O. The Philosophy of Modern Graphic Design. Synesis 2023, 15, e2724-46–e2724-65. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yuting, T.; Mohamed, F. Examining Consumer Perception and Purchase Intention of Gift Packaging: A Case Study of Chinese Consumers on Green Tea Packaging. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2023, 13, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fathi, P.; Member, S.; Karmakar, N.C.; Member, S. Potential Chipless RFID Sensors for Food Packaging Applications: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 9618–9636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alizadeh, A.M.; Masoomian, M.; Shakooie, M.; Zabihzadeh Khajavi, M.; Farhoodi, M. Trends and applications of intelligent packaging in dairy products: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Escobedo, P.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Nikbakhtnasrabadi, F.; Dahiya, R. Flexible Strain and Temperature Sensing NFC Tag for Smart Food Packaging Applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 26406–26414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hassoun, A.; Garcia-Garcia, G.; Trollman, H.; Jagtap, S.; Parra-López, C.; Cropotova, J.; Bhat, Z.; Centobelli, P.; Aït-Kaddour, A. Birth of dairy 4.0: Opportunities and challenges in adoption of fourth industrial revolution technologies in the production of milk and its derivatives. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Htun, N.N.; Wiśniewska, A.; Nocella, G.; Santa Cruz, E.; Peracaula-moner, A.; Vehmas, K.; Hakola, L.; Liczmanska-Kopcewicz, K.; Bridgett, D.L.; Vebert, K. Smart tag packaging technologies: A qualitative investigation of consumers’ needs and expectations. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malik, M.; Gahlawat, V.K.; Mor, R.S.; Singh, M.K. Unlocking dairy traceability: Current trends, applications, and future opportunities. Future Foods 2024, 10, 100426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bigelow, C. Typeface Features and Legibility Research. Vis. Res. 2019, 165, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Franken, G.; Pangerc, M.; Možina, K. Impact of Typeface and Colour Combinations on LCD Display Legibility. Emerg. Sci. J. 2020, 4, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shao, J.; Yan, K.; Liu, K.; Xue, C.; Li, X. Experimental Study on Legibility of Typographic Information of Ventilator Interface. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2022, 87, 103249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Capodieci, A.; Cornoldi, C.; Doerr, E.; Bertolo, L.; Carretti, B. The Use of New Technologies for Improving Reading Comprehension. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lewandowska, A.; Olejnik-Krugly, A. Do Background Colors Have an Impact on Preferences and Catch the Attention of Users? Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mead, J.A.; Hardesty, D.M. Price Font Disfluency: Anchoring Effects on Future Price Expectations. J. Retail. 2018, 94, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Medved, T.; Podlesek, A.; Možina, K. Influence of Letter Shape on Readers’ Emotional Experience, Reading Fluency, and Text Comprehension and Memorisation. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1107839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Medved, T.; Podlesek, A.; Možina, K. Eye-Tracking Study on Reading Fluency in Relation to Typeface Pleasantness Influenced by Cross-Modal Correspondence Between Taste and Shape. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niu, R.; Wu, W.; Li, Q.; Fang, Y. Evaluating the Effect of Font Size and Line Spancing in Chinese online Education User Interfaces on Children’s Learning experience. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2025, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Galliussi, J.; Perondi, L.; Chia, G.; Gerbino, W.; Bernardis, P. Inter-letter spacing, inter-word spacing, and font with dyslexia-friendly features: Testing text readability in people with and without dyslexia. Ann. Dyslexia 2020, 70, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wetzler, E.L.; Pyke, A.A.; Werner, A. Sans Forgetica Is Not the “Font” of Knowledge: Disfluent Fonts Are Not Always Desirable Difficulties. Sage Open 2021, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cushing, C.; Bodner, G.E. Reading Aloud Improves Proofreading (but Using Sans Forgetica Font Does Not). J. App. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2022, 11, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Joseph, H.; Powell, D. Does a specialist typeface affect how fluently children with and without dyslexia process letters, words, and passages? Dyslexia 2022, 28, 448–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Snell, J. No, Bionic Reading does not work. Acta Psychol. 2024, 247, 104304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ijaz, K.; Ahmadpour, N.; Wang, Y.; Calvo, R.A. Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) in an Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Platform Describes Motivation and Enjoyment. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Von Steinkeller, A.; Grosse, G. Children are more social when playing analog games together than digital games. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2022, 6, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pozzi, F.; Ceregini, A.; Ivanov, S.; Passarelli, M.; Persico, D.; Volta, E. Digital vs. Hybrid: Comparing Two Versions of a Board Game for Teacher Training. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pogačar, A.; Gregor-Svetec, D. Eco-Friendly Design for Sustainable Gift Packaging. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Žurbi, T.; Gregor-Svetec, D. NFC Tag Awareness and Its Visual Implementation on Food Packaging: Case Study in Slovenia. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Buljat, P.; Kovačević, D.; Kulčar, R. Determining Effective Color Combinations for Enhanced Legibility Presented on Print and Digital Formats. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toure, M.; Gabrijelčič Tomc, H.; Možina, K. Speed of Reading Instructions for Creative Task Performance: Influence of Typography and Reading Media. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Passarelli, M.; Masini, M.; Piccinno, T.F.; Rizzi, A. Don’t Flip the Table Yet: A Framework for the Analysis of Visual and Cognitive Ergonomics in Board Games. Games Cult. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Čerepinko, D.; Štefanović, R.; Hajdek, K.; Miljković, P. Less Is More in Digital Games Too: A Comparative Analysis of Visual Elements of Physical and Digital Versions for Two Tabletop Games. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mirzaei, V. The Impact of Color Psychology in Graphic Design: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. 2025, 13, 2088–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Matijević, M.; Bosančić, Ž.; Hajdek, M. Koffka Ring Perception in Digital Environments with Brightness Modulation. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. World Health Organisation. Ageing: Global Population. 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/population-ageing (accessed on 8 September 2025).
  46. World Health Organisation. Ageing and Health. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 8 September 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Možina, K.; Brozović, M. New Findings in Visual Communications on Visibility or Legibility in Different Media. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10274. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810274

AMA Style

Možina K, Brozović M. New Findings in Visual Communications on Visibility or Legibility in Different Media. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):10274. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Možina, Klementina, and Maja Brozović. 2025. "New Findings in Visual Communications on Visibility or Legibility in Different Media" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 10274. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810274

APA Style

Možina, K., & Brozović, M. (2025). New Findings in Visual Communications on Visibility or Legibility in Different Media. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10274. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop