Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Environmental Technologies: Recent Development, Opportunities, and Key Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of the Structure of the Alcohol Component on the Plasticizing Ability of the Ester of Aliphatic Dicarboxylic Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Pomace Powder of Musky Squash on the Characteristics of Foamy Confectionery Products during Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Innovative Grain Processing: Trends and Technologies

by
Georgiana Gabriela Codină
* and
Adriana Dabija
Faculty of Food Engineering, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 13 Universitatii Street, 720229 Suceava, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 10954; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310954
Submission received: 6 November 2024 / Accepted: 25 November 2024 / Published: 26 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends in Grain Processing for Food Industry)

1. Introduction

Consumers’ desire for a rational and healthy diet has led to an increase in the consumption of grain-based products. The high interest in the use of grain products in food consumption is because they bring together, in a small volume, important amounts of nutrients (proteins, carbohydrates, mineral salts, vitamins) that provide high energy value [1,2]. Also, the use of grain as a raw material for obtaining food products presents economic advantages related to its short vegetation period and ease of transport and storage. Depending on the form in which they are consumed, cereals may be considered functional foods, with health benefits such as cardiovascular system protection and digestion improvement [3,4]. As consumer demand for functional and nutritious food increases, the role of grain in the diet, along with innovative processing techniques, continues to evolve, promising a future with food products that are both nutritious and tailored to specific health needs. This increasing demand is related to growing awareness of the importance of a balanced diet, particularly for addressing health conditions such as diabetes and celiac disease [5].
Diabetes is a chronic disease caused by inherited or acquired deficient or insufficient insulin production by the pancreas. Insulin deficiency causes high concentrations of glucose to be present in the blood, which affects many of the body’s systems, particularly the circulatory and nervous systems [6]. Improving diet is the first measure taken in the treatment of diabetes; the bakery industry can contribute to this by providing various products that can be consumed as part of a hypoglycemic diet [7,8,9,10]. To reduce the glycemic indexes of bakery products, we must increase their resistant starch contents and decrease their total starch contents. Some processes, such as fermentation during leavening or pre-fermentation, the hydrothermal treatment of cereal suspensions, subsequent dough maturation, freezing or chilling, and storage and pre-consumption treatment, may reduce the glycemic indexes of bakery products [11]. Generally, whole grains have a lower glycemic index than refined grains because they contain more fiber and experience a slower digestion process.
Another type of product is gluten-free grain-based products, intended for people who cannot metabolize gluten [12,13]. Gluten is a protein found naturally in grains such as wheat, rye and barley [14]. Due to its varied symptoms, celiac disease is difficult to diagnose. The only treatment for celiac disease is consuming a strict diet that eliminates products that contain gluten [15]. Cereal products and floury foods intended for this population are obtained from gluten-free grains, typically using non-gluten flours. These products use alternative cereals or gluten-free flour sources such as rice, quinoa, buckwheat, corn, millet, amaranth, teff, etc. which have high contents of carbohydrates and essential nutrients but are gluten-free [16,17,18]. However, their use in bakery products is a real challenge due to the role of gluten in bread-making. It is formed during mixing using the gluten proteins of wheat flour. It also influences the rheological properties of the dough, which allow the dough to be modeled, maintain the form received during modeling, and retain gases [19,20,21].
The processing of food products inevitably transforms their physical–chemical characteristics and nutritional value. There are processes that allow for the better assimilation of such products by the human body; however, these process reduce the contents of key nutritional compounds. As a result, there is a need to restore products’ nutritional value; an effective solution is their supplementation with affected nutrients such as vitamins, essential minerals, fibers, essential fatty acids, antioxidants, proteins, etc. [22]. Also, to limit products’ nutritional value loss, different techniques may be used, such as minimal processing, grinding to optimal granulations sizes, extrusion, germination, fermentation, etc. [23].

2. An Overview of Published Articles

Thus, by grinding wheat grains, flour is obtained, traditionally used in the bakery and pasta industries. However, it may be used in other industries such as beer brewing. According to Krstanović et al. [24], different wheat varieties, which vary in terms of hardness and the degree of milling required, produce significantly different wort. A hybrid wheat variety may be needed to produce high-quality wheat beer. Adding different nutrients into wheat flour dough to improve bakery product quality from a nutritional point of view will significantly affect its rheological behavior and the quality of the finished products. The addition of different milling fractions of buckwheat will significantly affect the dough’s rheological properties during mixing and extension and improve bread characteristics. The addition of buckwheat will increase α-amylase activity in composite flours, water absorption, the dough development time, protein weakening, starch gelatinization, storage and loss modulation, dough fermentation parameters obtained via a Rheofermentometer and dough tenacity. Adding rheologically optimum levels of different buckwheat milling fractions of will lead to new bread formulations with higher volume, elasticity and porosity values [25]. To improve bread quality, the possibility of using a sourdough starter obtained from different flours has been discussed. The use of different flours, recipes, rations and fermentation temperatures affect the microbial populations of sourdough dough. Sourdough can be successfully used in a preliminary phase of bread-making, involving increasing the bacteria from the starter culture. Sourdough typically creates semi-finished products with high acidity, which ferment under set time and temperature conditions. In bakery products, the use of sourdough can lead to products with superior volume, crumb elasticity, slicing capacity and flavor characteristics [26,27].
Grain products are one of the most important food products included in the diet food category. They are intended for people with various conditions (diabetes, hypertension, people with gluten intolerance, etc.), as well as for those who are healthy but have certain nutritional needs. The use of different non-gluten flours, such as baobab flour (Adansonia digitata L.), buckwheat flour (Fagopyrum esculentum), rice flour, and quinoa flour, may lead to high-quality bakery products. Also, the use of some ingredients, such as sea buckthorn, protein isolate, different types of legumes flours (lentils, lupine, chickpeas, peas), pea powder, yeast powder, almond powder, and spirulina powder, will increase the nutritional value of cereal food products. A product with an improved nutritional value was developed by Netreba et al. [28]. This product was a foamy confectionery product with pomace powder formed by musky squash and artichoke syrup. Adding up to 15% pomace powder from musky squash to the foam confectionary product’s recipe gave it good sensory characteristics and texture parameters. It was concluded that the use of pumpkin pulp in the foamy confectionery product’s recipe improved its biological value and sensory characteristics, as well as its shelf life.
These studies collectively highlight significant trends in grain processing, aiming to improve the quality of finished food products.

3. Conclusions

It can be concluded that in the last few decades, grain processing has experienced significant development due to scientific progress; this progress has included the development of biotechnologies, the improvement of technological processes used in grain processing, and the transfer of knowledge through fundamental and applied research. Future grain processing will be improved due to the need for healthier and more sustainable food products. Advances in food processing, especially through fermentation and heat treatments, have further improved the rheology and quality of grain-based products. By incorporating alternative flours and functional ingredients, the industry can create food products that not only meet nutritional needs but also have enhanced sensory characteristics and shelf lives.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mesta-Corral, M.; Gómez-García, R.; Balagurusamy, N.; Torres-León, C.; Hernández-Almanza, A.Y. Technological and Nutritional Aspects of Bread Production: An Overview of Current Status and Future Challenges. Foods 2024, 13, 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, W.; Boateng, I.D.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y. Proteins from Legumes, Cereals, and Pseudo-Cereals: Composition, Modification, Bioactivities, and Applications. Foods 2024, 13, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abdi, R.; Joye, I.J. Prebiotic Potential of Cereal Components. Foods 2021, 10, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grasgruber, P.; Sebera, M.; Hrazdira, E.; Hrebickova, S.; Cacek, J. Food consumption and the actual statistics of cardiovascular diseases: An epidemiological comparison of 42 European countries. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 60, 31694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Le, T.H.; Disegna, M.; Lloyd, T. National food consumption patterns: Converging trends and the implications for health. EuroChoices 2023, 22, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cho, Y.R.; Ann, S.H.; Won, K.B.; Park, G.M.; Kim, Y.G.; Yang, D.H.; Kang, J.W.; Lim, T.H.; Kim, H.K.; Choe, J.; et al. Association between insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and coronary artery disease according to the presence of diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Romão, B.; Falcomer, A.L.; Palos, G.; Cavalcante, S.; Botelho, R.B.A.; Nakano, E.Y.; Raposo, A.; Shakeel, F.; Alshehri, S.; Mahdi, W.A.; et al. Glycemic Index of Gluten-Free Bread and Their Main Ingredients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 2021, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Cairano, M.; Condelli, N.; Caruso, M.C.; Marti, A.; Cela, N.; Galgano, F. Functional properties and predicted glycemic index of gluten free cereal, pseudocereal and legume flours. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 133, 109860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Punia Bangar, S.; Sharma, N.; Singh, A.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Brennan, C.S. Glycaemic response of pseudocereal-based gluten-free food products: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 4936–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Atkinson, F.S.; Brand-Miller, J.C.; Foster-Powell, K.; Buyken, A.E.; Goletzke, J. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values 2021: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 1625–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skřivan, P.; Sluková, M.; Sinica, A.; Bleha, R.; Švec, I.; Šárka, E.; Pourová, V. Glycaemic Index of Bakery Products and Possibilities of Its Optimization. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dean, D.; Rombach, M.; Vriesekoop, F.; Mongondry, P.; Le Viet, H.; Laophetsakunchai, S.; Urbano, B.; Briz, T.; Xhakollari, V.; Atasoy, G.; et al. Against the Grain: Consumer’s Purchase Habits and Satisfaction with Gluten-Free Product Offerings in European Food Retail. Foods 2024, 13, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matera, M.; Guandalini, S. How the Microbiota May Affect Celiac Disease and What We Can Do. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Estévez, V.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Schlack, P.; Navarrete, P.; Bascuñán, K.A.; Núñez, V.; Oyarce, C.; Flores, C.; Ayala, J.; Araya, M. Persistent Barriers of the Gluten-Free Basic Food Basket: Availability, Cost, and Nutritional Composition Assessment. Nutrients 2024, 16, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stanciu, D.; Staykov, H.; Dragomanova, S.; Tancheva, L.; Pop, R.S.; Ielciu, I.; Crișan, G. Gluten Unraveled: Latest Insights on Terminology, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, Dietary Strategies, and Intestinal Microbiota Modulations—A Decade in Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bueno, C.; Thys, R.; Tischer, B. Potential Effects of the Different Matrices to Enhance the Polyphenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity in Gluten-Free Bread. Foods 2023, 12, 4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaroszewska, A.; Jedrejek, D.; Sobolewska, M.; Kowalska, I.; Dzięcioł, M. Mineral, Nutritional, and Phytochemical Composition and Baking Properties of Teff and Watermelon Seed Flours. Molecules 2023, 28, 3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khairuddin, M.A.N.; Lasekan, O. Gluten-Free Cereal Products and Beverages: A Review of Their Health Benefits in the Last Five Years. Foods 2021, 10, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huertas-García, A.B.; Guzmán, C.; Ibba, M.I.; Rakszegi, M.; Sillero, J.C.; Alvarez, J.B. Processing and Bread-Making Quality Profile of Spanish Spelt Wheat. Foods 2023, 12, 2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Alshegaihi, R.M.; Mahgoub, E.I.; Mansour, E.; Atallah, O.O.; Sattar, M.N.; Al-Mssallem, M.Q.; Alessa, F.M.; Aldaej, M.I.; Hassanin, A.A. Association of High and Low Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits with Gluten Strength in Tetraploid Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. Durum L.). Plants 2023, 12, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tóth, V.; Láng, L.; Vida, G.; Mikó, P.; Rakszegi, M. Characterization of the Protein and Carbohydrate Related Quality Traits of a Large Set of Spelt Wheat Genotypes. Foods 2022, 11, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pinto, D.; Castro, I.; Vicente, A.; Bourbon, A.I.; Cerqueira, M.A. Functional Bakery Products—An Overview and Future Perspectives. In Bakery Products Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; Zhou, W., Hui, H., De Leyn, I., Pagani, M.A., Rosell, C.M., Selman, D., Therdthai, N., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 431–452. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dewettinck, K.; Van Bockstaele, F.; Kühne, B.; Van de Walle, D.; Courtens, T.M.; Gellynck, X. Nutritional value of bread: Influence of processing, food interaction and consumer perception. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krstanović, V.; Habschied, K.; Košir, I.J.; Mastanjević, K. The Influence of Texture Type and Grain Milling Degree on the Attenuation Limit, Protein Content, and Degradation in Wheat Wort. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Coţovanu, I.; Mironeasa, C.; Mironeasa, S. Insights into the Potential of Buckwheat Flour Fractions in Wheat Bread Dough. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, S.; Wang, Z.; Guo, X.; Wang, F.; Huang, J.; Sun, B.; Wang, X. Sourdough improves the quality of whole-wheat flour products: Mechanisms and challenges—A review. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Vuyst, L.; Comasio, A.; Kerrebroeck, S.V. Sourdough Production: Fermentation Strategies, Microbial Ecology, and Use of Non-Flour Ingredients. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 63, 2447–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Netreba, N.; Sergheeva, E.; Gurev, A.; Dragancea, V.; Codină, G.G.; Sturza, R.; Ghendov-Mosanu, A. The Influence of Pomace Powder of Musky Squash on the Characteristics of Foamy Confectionery Products during Storage. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Codină, G.G.; Dabija, A. Innovative Grain Processing: Trends and Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10954. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310954

AMA Style

Codină GG, Dabija A. Innovative Grain Processing: Trends and Technologies. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(23):10954. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Codină, Georgiana Gabriela, and Adriana Dabija. 2024. "Innovative Grain Processing: Trends and Technologies" Applied Sciences 14, no. 23: 10954. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310954

APA Style

Codină, G. G., & Dabija, A. (2024). Innovative Grain Processing: Trends and Technologies. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 10954. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop