Next Article in Journal
A Proposal for Basic Formal Ontology for Knowledge Management in Building Information Modeling Domain
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning Algorithms to Identify Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children-Based Facial Landmarks
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research and Example Verification on Stability Coefficient of Vertical Bar of Fastener Steel Pipe Support

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(8), 4857; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084857
by Yipin Dong, Sanqing Li, Fankui Zeng *, Meng Ji and Jinxin Wang
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(8), 4857; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084857
Submission received: 9 March 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 8 April 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please refer to the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper titled “Research and example verification on stability coefficient of vertical bar of fastener steel pipe support” is a great paper to be published in the Applied sciences journal, however, many changes are required to be done before it is published.

Abstract

First of all the first sentence in the abstract should not start with because.

Overall the section is okay, but it will be better if the authors could provide some results within a number and percentage of comparison.

 

Keywords

okay

 

Introduction

There may be many more studies authors should discuss before step into the other parts such as

“Numerical and Experimental Study on the Member Performance and Stability Bearing Capacity of Wheel Coupler Formwork Supports”

“Buckling Behavior of A Wheel Coupler High-Formwork Support System Based on Semi-Rigid Connection Joints”

“Safety and stability analysis of variable cross-section disc-buckle type steel pipe high support system”

“Object Detection Using ESP32 Cameras for Quality Control of Steel Components in Manufacturing Structures”

 

Line 57 : figure () not written the figure number please mention it. However, in the figure what is the unit of the initial rookedness please mention it properly.

Line 65: why authors use SAP2000? Please explain before go ahead and tell that used SAP2000.

 

Table 1, please use superscript to show mm in right way.

Figure 2 and figure 2 two times written figure 2 please fix them, figure 3 caption’s I am not sure what do you mean of foundation condition? Please explain, it has meaning here a lot.

Figure 3 change to Figure 4, and what is JD-1 stand for? If you use JD in capital please be consistent in the entire paper.  The unit from Figure 4 to 7 are so small please increase their size.

Table 2 , what is reference [3] it is best for the author to mention them.

From equations, 1 to 5 please identify each of the terms after introducing each formula.

Figure 9 the information on the figure is too small please enlarge them. Please make table 3 close to the state in the paragraph.

For table 4 as well please make the paragraph close to table 4

In section 5.2 please show these detail of the pipe in a figure or take a photo in the laboratory and show some figures from SAP2000.

 

CONCLUSION

Please reduce the content of each bullet point and mention only the outcomes.

 

It is also necessary to add a paragraph to discuss the future what is necessary to do. 

Author Response

Please refer to the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Improvement of the manuscript has been noticed.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is in good condition to be published in the Applied Sciences.

Back to TopTop