Analysis of the Motion Sickness and the Lack of Comfort in Car Passengers

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. At this moment the paper contains only three relations which are available in references.
2. The authors must offer more details concerning their statistical analysis (sections 4, 5, 6, and 7). For instance, the authors have to specify which formulae were applied, their significance etc.
3. How do the authors correlate their results with the results offered by references? Which is the novelty?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors should add country in affiliation 2.

-The manuscript will benefit significantly through a thorough proofreading for typos and grammatical errors. For example, Line 42 “it is known” in the start of the sentence and in Line177 “..so as to asses the accelerations” they have to be corrected.

-The authors should avoid first person throughout the manuscript (for example L76).

-L69: “According to Griffin [17],..” it should Griffin et al.

- It is not clear what the values of Table 1 indicate, since there is a significant overlap among them.

-The authors should define the frequency span of the signals, sampling time interval and sampling frequency. Why the first case (blue) stops at 300s and the other case (red) stops at 400s in Figure 4?

-The potential merits of this study are discussed in the introduction. However, few references were given. Please add necessary references in Introduction and Comfort evaluation methods Sections to support the motivation of this research.

-The authors should define which are the X, Y, Z axes in Figures 10 and 11.

-References: For Refs 10, 11, 20, 27 only the initials have been written. Th authors should provide the full names. Also, there are no MDPI references at all in the literature.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf