The Verification of the Degree of Concordance of the SMI/CVMS Indexes in Evaluating the Pubertal Growth Stages—Longitudinal Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- -
- The pre-pubertal stage has as corresponding indexes—SMI 1,2,3,4 and CVMS 1,2
- -
- The pubertal stage, in which occurs the peak moment of growth, has as corresponding indexes—SMI 5,6,7 and CVMS 3
- -
- The post-pubertal stage has as corresponding indexes—SMI 8,9,10,11–CVMS 4,5.
- -
- The Pearson parametric correlation test, in order to see the degree of association of the obtained values
- -
- The t test for pair measurements, in order to see whether there exist any systematical errors within the analyzed data
- -
- The Cohen’s kappa coefficient.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The study proves the correspondence of the skeletal maturity index SMI and cervical vertebral maturation stage CVMS and confirms the validity of the hypothesis tested within the longitudinal study:The pre-pubertal stage has the corresponding indexes SMI 1,2,3,4 and CVMS 1,2.The pubertal stage has the corresponding indexes SMI 5,6,7 and CVMS 3.The post-pubertal stage has the corresponding indexes SMI 8,9,10,11 and CVMS 4,5.The Cohen’s kappa coefficient shows the existence of an almost perfect concordance in the case of both sexes (k = 0.84 for female and for male k = 0.85).
- (2)
- The validation of the hypothesis within the longitudinal study supports the idea of a possible clinical applicability of the CVMS indexes for estimating the skeletal age along the treatment, after starting the use of orthodontic appliances. The results obtained show that the method could be clinically useful, offering information about the biological stage in which the patient finds himself/herself, in order for the orthodontist to be able to evaluate the remaining growth over the period of the orthodontic treatment.
- (3)
- The comparison of the statistical data obtained in the two studies (transversal and longitudinal) showed with no exception better results within the longitudinal study, as a better concordance was found among the analyzed data.
- (4)
- The study shows that both SMI and CVMS indexes could be used in order to determine the biological moment in which the patient finds himself/herself. For estimating the skeletal age, the orthodontist may use, as a common practice, the lateral cephalogram, which spares the patient from an additional eradiation necessary for a hand X-ray.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grave, K.C.; Brown, T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am. J. Orthod. 1976, 69, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grave, B.; Brown, T.; Townsend, G. Comparison of cervicovertebral dimensions in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Eur. J. Orthod. 1999, 21, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fishman, L.S. Chronological versus Skeletal Age, an Evaluation of Craniofacial Growth. Angle Orthod. 1979, 49, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Fishman, L.S. Radiographic Evaluation of Skeletal Maturation: A Clinically—Orientated Method Based on Hand Wrist Films. Angle Orthod. 1982, 52, 88–112. [Google Scholar]
- Turchetta, B.J.; Fishman, L.S.; Subtelny, D.J. Facial Growth Prediction: A Comparison of Methodologies. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassel, B.; Farman, A.G. Skeletal Maturation Evaluation Using Cervical Vertebrae. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1995, 107, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baccetti, T.; Franchi, L.; McNamara, J.A. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVMS) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002, 72, 316–323. [Google Scholar]
- Kylamarkula, S.; Huggare, J. Head posture and the morphology of the first cervical vertebra. Eur. J. Orthod. 1985, 7, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnesen, L. Associations between the Cervical Vertebral Column and Craniofacial Morphology. Int. J. Dent. 2010, 295728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hägg, U.; Taranger, J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt. Am. J. Orthod. 1982, 82, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grave, K.; Townsend, G. Cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt. Aust. J. Orthod. 2003, 19, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
- Grave, K.; Townsend, G. Hand-wrist and cervical vertebral maturation indicators: How can these events be used to time Class II treatment? Aust. J. Orthod. 2003, 19, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Fernandez, P.; Torre, H.; Flores, L.; Rea, J. The cervical vertebrae as maturational indicators. J. Clin. Orthod. 1998, 32, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- O’Reilly, M.; Yanniello, G.J. Mandibular Growth Changes and Maturation of Cervical Vertebrae: A Longitudinal Cephalometric Study. Angle Orthod. 1988, 58, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kucukkeles, N.; Acar, A.; Biren, S.; Arun, T. Comparisons between cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation for the assessment of skeletal maturity. J. Clin. Pediatric Dent. 1999, 24, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
- Franchi, L.; Baccetti, T.; McNamara, J.A., Jr. Mandibular Growth as Related to Cervical Vertebral Maturation and Body Height. Am. J. Orthop. Dentofac. Orthop. 2000, 118, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Franchi, L.; Baccetti, T.; McNamara, J.A. Postpubertal asssessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2004, 126, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.P.; Liao, C.H.; Yang, Y.H.; Chang, H.F.; Chen, K.C. Correlation of cervical vertebrae maturation with hand-wrist maturation in children, Kaoshiung. J. Med. Sci. 2001, 17, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- San Roman, P.; Palma, J.C.; Oteo, M.D.; Nevado, E. Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur. J. Orthod. 2002, 24, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballrick, J.; Fields, H.; Vig, K.W.L.; Beck, F.M.; Germak, T.; Baccetti, T.; Franchi, L. Reliability and Validity of Cervical Vertebral Maturation and Hand-Wrist Radiographs. In Proceedings of the 83rd General Session of the IADR/AADR/CADR, Baltimore, MD, USA, 9–12 March 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Flores-Mir, C.; Burgess, C.A.; Champney, M.; Jensen, R.J.; Pitcher, M.R.; Major, P.W. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod. 2006, 76, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Manosudprasit, M.; Wangsrimongkol, T.; Pisek, P.; Chantaramungkorn, M. Comparative Study between the Hand-Wrist Method and Cervical Vertebral Maturation Method for Evaluation Skeletal Maturity in Cleft Patients. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2013, 96, S19–S24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Galan, E.; Hlatcu, A.R.; Bencze, A.; Teodorescu, E.; Păcurar, M.; Chibelean, M.; Ionescu, E. Concordanţa indicilor de maturare osoasă SMI şi CVMS în etapele creşterii pubertare—Studiu transversal Ro. J. Stomatol. 2021, 67, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
- Beit, P.; Peltomaki, T.; Schatzle, M.; Signorelli, L.; Patcas, R. Evaluating the Agreement of Skeletal Age Assessment Based on Hand-Wrist and Cervical Vertebrae Radiography. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cangialosi, T.; Vives, V. Another Look at Skeletal Maturation Using Hand Wrist and Cervical Vertebrae Evaluation. Open J. Orthop. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gandini, P.; Mancini, M.; Andreani, F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod. 2006, 76, 984–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lai, E.H.; Liu, J.; Chang, J.Z.; Tsai, S.; Yao, C.; Chen, M. Radiographic Assessment of Skeletal Maturation Stages for Orthodontic Patients: Hand-wrist Bones or Cervical Vertebrae? J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2008, 107, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mellon, Z.J.; Behrents, R.G.; Johnston, L.E. The Pattern of Facial Skeletal Growth and Its Relationship to Various Common Indexes of Maturation. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 143, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soegiharto, B.M.; Moles, D.R.; Cunningham, S.J. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with receiver operating characteristics analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 134, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, R.W.; Alkhal, H.A.; Rabie, B.M. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 136, 484.e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Growth Stage | SMI | CVMS |
---|---|---|
Pre-pubertal stage | 1,2,3,4 | 1,2 |
Pubertal stage | 5,6,7 | 3 |
Post-pubertal stage | 8,9,10,11 | 4,5 |
CVMS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMI | 1 | 2 | 3 | TOTAL |
1 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 25 |
2 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 13 |
3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 21 |
TOTAL | 26 | 11 | 22 | 59 |
CVMS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMI | 1 | 2 | 3 | TOTAL |
1 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 26 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
TOTAL | 23 | 5 | 16 | 61 |
Statistic Test | Value Obtained for Females | Value Obtained for Males | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Transversal Study | Longitudinal Study | Transversal Study | Longitudinal Study | |
Pearson r correlation test | r = 0.90 | r = 0.94 | r = 0.87 | r = 0.94 |
t Test for pair measurements | p = 0.57 | p = 1 | p = 0.76 | p = 0.18 |
Cohen’s kappa coefficient | k = 0.83 | k = 0.84 | k = 0.67 | k = 0.85 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Galan, E.; Hlatcu, A.R.; Milicescu, Ș., Jr.; Teodorescu, E.; Neagoe, S.; Ionescu, E. The Verification of the Degree of Concordance of the SMI/CVMS Indexes in Evaluating the Pubertal Growth Stages—Longitudinal Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062783
Galan E, Hlatcu AR, Milicescu Ș Jr., Teodorescu E, Neagoe S, Ionescu E. The Verification of the Degree of Concordance of the SMI/CVMS Indexes in Evaluating the Pubertal Growth Stages—Longitudinal Study. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(6):2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062783
Chicago/Turabian StyleGalan, Elena, Andreea Raluca Hlatcu, Ștefan Milicescu, Jr., Elina Teodorescu, Simina Neagoe, and Ecaterina Ionescu. 2022. "The Verification of the Degree of Concordance of the SMI/CVMS Indexes in Evaluating the Pubertal Growth Stages—Longitudinal Study" Applied Sciences 12, no. 6: 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062783
APA StyleGalan, E., Hlatcu, A. R., Milicescu, Ș., Jr., Teodorescu, E., Neagoe, S., & Ionescu, E. (2022). The Verification of the Degree of Concordance of the SMI/CVMS Indexes in Evaluating the Pubertal Growth Stages—Longitudinal Study. Applied Sciences, 12(6), 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062783