Next Article in Journal
A Review on the Service Virtualisation and Its Structural Pillars
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Literature Review of Swarm Robotics Strategies Applied to Target Search Problem with Environment Constraints
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Parameter Optimization of Hole-Slot-Type Magnetron for Controlling Resonant Frequency of Linear Accelerator 6 MeV by Reverse Engineering Technique

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2384; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052384
by Nattawat Yachum 1,2, Somjai Chunjarean 1, Nilaped Russamee 1 and Jiraphon Srisertpol 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2384; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052384
Submission received: 16 January 2021 / Revised: 1 March 2021 / Accepted: 3 March 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presents parameters optimization of a twelve-hole-slot type magnetron based on reverse engineering technique. Its focus is on the effects of disturbances such temperature and vacuum pressure.

Dear authors, the work has novelty and is of interest to readers. However, you are using figures (figs. 10, 12, 13, 14,) that the reader may see in your earlier work: N. Yachum, N. Russamee and J. Srisertpol, Automatic frequency control of the magnetron system for medical linear accelerator using fuzzy logic control, Proceedings of XLVI International Summer School-Conference APM 2018, pp. 275-285. I recommend you to reflect the results presented in the indicated figures in a different way. I believe that the article will not lose its high quality. Wish you luck

I believe that the article can be published after minor revision

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

I sent my revised manuscript with response to your comments. Please see attached file as your request.

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely

Srisertpol J, PhD.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. There is a typo on page 3: “The structure of the paper is given as follow; In section 2, describes the research methodology that..”.
  2. Also on page 3 is a typo: “development of the medical linear accelerator for the treatment cancer applications. [28] The”.
  3. There is a typo on page 5: “In the Figure 2, The method of measuring structure dimensions of the magnetron, using probe tip..”.
  4. Equation (4) contains an irrational entry: the last two multipliers on the right side can be combined and written more compactly. Also from the following it appears that n is not necessarily equal to N/2?
  5. Equation (10) contains a misprint: can't be a summand RV/12 for reasons of proper dimensionality.
  6. After Equation (10) is no decryption what is ΔT.
  7. Equation (15) contains perhaps a typo: the sum sign should be in both the numerator and the denominator?
  8. In “References” is no dot at the end after most links.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

I sent my revised manuscript with response to your comments. Please see attached file as your request.

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely

Srisertpol J, PhD.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

                    1365 / 5000    

Výsledky pÅ™ekladu

The authors of the article present the optimization of the parameters of a magnetron of the twelve-hole slit type based on the technique of reverse engineering in order to improve the operation of the 6 MeV Linear accelerator (LINAC) for fruit sterilization. Based on analyzes and experimental verifications, they show the results of the optimal design. I recommend to publish

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you for your kind support, I sent my revised manuscript. 

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely

Srisertpol J, PhD.

Back to TopTop