Next Article in Journal
Abnormal Strain Induced by Heavy Rainfall on Borehole Strainmeters Observed in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Corrosion Performance of Aluminium Matrix Composites Reinforced with Refractory High-Entropy Alloy Particulates
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Driving Frequency and Voltage on the Performances of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizers

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031296
by Sang-Hyub Moon 1,2, Kyung Hwa Chang 1, Hyun Mok Park 1,2, Bong Joo Park 3,4, Sun Kook Yoo 2,5,* and Ki Chang Nam 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031296
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 1 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.rtf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

We would like to thank the reviewers for the thorough review, thoughtful questions and proposed corrections. We believe this has substantially improved our paper.

Please accept our modified manuscript and response for further consideration. The reviewer comments and author responses attached.
We look forward to feedback to our responses and manuscript revisions.

 

With kind regards

Ki Chang Nam

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Can the authors provide a block/schematic diagram of how the vibrating mesh nebuliser works? I see that there is a description in the text of Section 1, but for readers, such as myself, who are not familiar with these devices, it would be helpful.

What are the practical implications of optimsing power consumption, particle size and output rate? i.e. will it save money/drug quantities, provide more effective treatment etc.

Given the results, are there are trade-offs to be made between the three measured parameters (power, rate, size) when deciding on an optimal configuration? Which of the parameters is the most important?

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

We would like to thank the reviewers for the thorough review, thoughtful questions and proposed corrections. We believe this has substantially improved our paper.

Please accept our modified manuscript and response for further consideration. The reviewer comments and author responses attached.
We look forward to feedback to our responses and manuscript revisions.

 

With kind regards

Ki Chang Nam

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop