Next Article in Journal
MMPC-RF: A Deep Multimodal Feature-Level Fusion Architecture for Hybrid Spam E-mail Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Laser-Assisted Etching of EagleXG Glass by Irradiation at Low Pulse-Repetition Rate
Previous Article in Journal
Psychological Effects of Sweet Taste and Sweet Taste Preference
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generation of Cold Magnetized Relativistic Plasmas at the Rear of Thin Foils Irradiated by Ultra-High-Intensity Laser Pulses

by
Artem V. Korzhimanov
Federal Research Center, Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 603950 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(24), 11966; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411966
Submission received: 24 November 2021 / Revised: 8 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021

Abstract

:
A scheme to generate magnetized relativistic plasmas in a laboratory setting is proposed. It is based on the interaction of ultra-high-intensity sub-picosecond laser pulses with few-micron-thick foils or films. By means of Particle-In-Cell simulations, it is shown that energetic electrons produced by the laser and evacuated at the rear of the target trigger an expansion of the target, building up a strong azimuthal magnetic field. It is shown that in the expanding plasma sheath, a ratio of the magnetic pressure and the electron rest-mass energy density exceeds unity, whereas the plasma pressure is lower than the magnetic pressure and the electron gyroradius is lower than the plasma dimension. This scheme can be utilized to study astrophysical extreme phenomena such as relativistic magnetic reconnection in laboratory.

1. Introduction

Recently, there has been an increased interest in the possibility of investigating processes characteristic of extreme astrophysical objects in laboratories using powerful laser systems [1,2]. In particular, much attention is paid to the study of the magnetic reconnection process, which is widely encountered in space. Typical experiments in this area use two nanosecond laser pulses with energies ranging from a few Joules to several kilojoules to irradiate a metal surface. As a result of the interaction, ablation of a heated substance takes place, in which azimuthal magnetic fields are self-generated due to the Biermann battery effect. Such magnetized expanding plumes may be arranged to collide with each other, initiating a reconnection of oppositely directed magnetic lines in an interaction region [3,4,5,6,7].
In most of the experiments carried out, however, the case of a nonrelativistic plasma was investigated. At the same time, magnetic reconnection in the relativistic regime is expected to occur in a vicinity of extreme astrophysical objects such as pulsars, magnetars, and active galactic nuclei. A key parameter in this case is a cold magnetization parameter, which is equal to a ratio of a magnetic pressure to an electron rest energy density σ = B 2 / ( μ 0 n e m e c 2 ) , where B is the magnetic field induction; μ0 is the magnetic constant; ne, me are the concentration and mass of electrons, respectively; and c is the speed of light [8]. The case of the magnetized relativistic plasma corresponds to σ > 1 , and until recently such values were unattainable in the laboratory.
In recent works, however, the σ > 1 regime was obtained by two methods. One of them is similar to the approach of non-relativistic experiments, but it used either a pair of 2 J, 40 fs laser pulses from the HERCULES facility, or 500 J, 20 ps pulses from the OMEGA EP facility [9]. The high power of laser pulses made it possible to attain intensities of the order of 1018–1019 W/cm2 at the focus, which, as is known, is sufficient for the energy of the electrons to become comparable to their rest energy [10]. As a result, a field of approximately 1 kT was generated in the expanding plasma plume, which made it possible to reach σ 10 . An integral property of the scheme used, however, was the high value of a parameter β = μ 0 n e k T e / B 2 , equal to the ratio of the electron kinetic pressure to the magnetic pressure (here, k is the Boltzmann constant and T e is the electron temperature). In the experiment, its value was estimated at β 50 . At the same time, in the aspect of astrophysical applications, a cold plasma with a dominant role of a magnetic field and β 1 is usually considered.
The second method for achieving high degrees of magnetization in a laser-plasma experiment is based on the use of a picosecond laser pulse of a kilojoule energy level to generate a magnetic field in a microcoil [11]. When a coil was irradiated with laser radiation at opposite ends, counterstreaming currents of the order of 1 MA were generated in it, which led to the creation of antiparallel fields of magnitude above 1 kT. According to estimates, the experiment reached σ ∼ 20–100 at β ∼ 0.01–0.1. The main disadvantage of such experiments is a hard accessibility of such laser systems.
Other methods of organizing relativistic magnetic reconnection have been theoretically proposed as alternative approaches. For example, in [12,13,14,15,16,17] it is proposed to observe an antiparallel configuration of magnetic fields during a parallel propagation of two ultrashort superintense laser pulses in transparent plasma. In plasma wakefields generated by them, the azimuthal magnetic field is observed. When two wakefields come into contact, for example, when they gradually expand in plasma with a negative density gradient, those fields begin to annihilate. The disadvantage of this method is that the electrons in the interaction region are relativistic, and their Larmor radii exceed a size of the region of localization of magnetic fields. That is the reconnection is observed only in the electron diffusion region in the very vicinity of an X-point.
Finally, in [18], the authors propose using micro-slabs irradiated with laser pulses along a surface to observe relativistic magnetic reconnection. It was shown numerically that when using a femtosecond laser pulse of multi-terawatt power, σ 1 can be achieved at β 0.1 , and when the power is increased to a petawatt level, σ > 100 can be achieved. The main difficulty in the experimental implementation of such a scheme is the need to use high-contrast laser pulses and precise targeting of a relatively tightly focused pulse to the end of a slab of submicron thickness.
In this paper, we propose another method for generating cold ( β 0.1 ) magnetized ( σ 10 ) relativistic plasma, which is based on the interaction of powerful subpicosecond pulses with thin targets. As is known, the interaction of relativistically intense radiation with the surface leads to efficient generation of beams of energetic electrons injected by the field into the target [19,20,21]. These electrons, possessing relativistic energies, freely pass through targets up to several tens of microns thick. Escaping from the back side, they are decelerated by an emerging charge separation field and initiate ionization of the rear surface of the target and the expansion of the resulting plasma. As a result, a plasma sheath is formed, with electrons heated to relativistic temperatures and a laminar flow of cold ions [22].
Continuing escaping electron bunches form a current on the axis of the sheath and generate an azimuthal magnetic field [23]. At low laser pulse intensities and durations, this field does not significantly alter the expansion dynamics, although it can lead to the observed changes in the spectrum of the expanding ions. Recently, however, it was discovered that for pulses of several hundred femtoseconds duration and intensity above 1020 W/cm2, the magnetic field is sufficient to magnetize the electrons and thereby appreciably slow down the expansion of the plasma [24,25].
In this work, we studied in more detail the properties of the resulting plasma and found that conditions for a cold magnetized relativistic plasma are realized in it, allowing using this mechanism for observing relativistic magnetic reconnection under laboratory conditions.

2. Methods

An analysis of a formation of the magnetized plasma during the interaction of laser radiation with thin dense targets was carried out by numerical simulation of a complete self-consistent system of Maxwell equations for electromagnetic fields and kinetic Vlasov equations for plasma species by means of a particle-in-cell method using the PICADOR software package [26]. Modeling was carried out in two-dimensional geometry. The length of the box was selected in the range from 280 to 380 μm, depending on the intensity and duration of the laser pulse, so that by the end of the simulation the plasma did not reach the right boundary. The box width was 80 μm. A grid step along both axes was 0.02 μm. The calculation time was 3000 fs and the time step was 0.02 fs. Absorbing boundary conditions were used at all boundaries both for particles and fields. The number of particles in the cell at the initial moment of time was 200.
An aluminum foil with a thickness of 2 μm was used as the target. It was located at a distance of 30 μm from the left boundary of the box. Ions were pre-ionized to the Al9+ state. Their concentration at the initial moment of time was 5 × 1022 cm−3. The boundaries of the target were initially assumed to be perfectly sharp. A layer of fully ionized hydrogen with a thickness of 0.02 μm was added to the rear surface of the target, which imitated a natural contamination of the target surface, and also accelerated the expansion of the plasma due to the smaller mass of protons compared to the mass of aluminum ions.
The 2D simulations were carried out so that the linearly polarized laser light was in the plane of the simulations. The beam was incident onto the target from the left along the normal to the surface and focused into a spot 4 μm in diameter at FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum). The calculations were performed with pulses with a duration of 100, 400, 700, and 1000 fs at FWHM. The results for pulses with the duration of 400 fs and longer are in qualitative agreement with each other so only qualitatively different cases of 100 fs and 700 fs are presented in the paper. The pulse envelope in both coordinates was a Gaussian.
The noisy distributions of electron density, electron energy density and magnetic field obtained as a result of modeling were smoothed by a Gaussian filter with a width of 0.2 μm. All transformations have then been carried out on smoothed distributions. To obtain a magnetic field gradient, we used a convolution of the initial distribution of the magnetic field with the first derivative of the Gaussian function in both directions with the same width of 0.2 μm.

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the time evolution of the electron density ne, the electron temperature Te (obtained as a ratio of the local kinetic energy density of electrons to their concentration) and the transverse component of the magnetic field Bz at different times for a pulse with a duration of 700 fs and an intensity of 1020 W/cm2.
It can be seen that at the beginning (Figure 1d,e) the target is deformed under the action of radiation and a noticeable pre-plasma layer is formed in the region x < 0 μm, which enhances absorption of radiation. Later the interaction takes the form of a so-called “hole-boring” which enhances the absorption even more. On the rear side of the target, the expulsion of the energetic electrons is observed. It triggers the expansion of the plasma and the formation of the plasma sheath. At a later moment in time (Figure 1g–i), an increase in the azimuthal magnetic field is observed in the formed plasma sheath. With increasing intensity, the magnitude of the generated magnetic field also grows, reaching a maximum at the moment when the maximum of the laser pulse arrives at the target (Figure 1j–l).
At this moment, the magnetic field at its peak reaches a value of the order of 400 MG, and is of the order of 100 MG in most of the plasma sheath. Note that the electron concentration in the same region is in the range 1020–1021 cm−3. As for the electron temperature, a high-energy electron current is observed on the sheath axis; however, to the side of it, the electron temperature is much lower, and in a significant region near the target, it is significantly below the relativistic value k T e < m c 2 . Due to the fact that in such a plasma there are no effective mechanisms for cooling electrons, then, most likely, these cold electrons were drawn out by a cold reverse current to compensate for the charge of hot electrons that had sufficient energy to leave the interaction region.
At later times, the plasma continues to expand and cool down a little, but the magnetic field is dissipating slowly and changes in magnitude insignificantly. An interesting feature is that, as follows from the performed calculations, the magnitude of the magnetic field at later times is practically independent of the intensity of the laser radiation. This can be seen from Figure 2, which shows a time dependence of the peak value of the magnetic field for different intensities of the laser pulses with fixed duration. Although the field value at the maximum of the laser pulse increases with intensity, it relaxes to an almost identical value of about 100 MG after the pulse leaves.
Let us now turn to an analysis of the main parameters of the resulting plasma. Figure 3 shows the distributions of the previously introduced parameters β = μ 0 n e k T e / B z 2 and σ = B z 2 / μ 0 n e m e c 2 , and also a quantity δ = R L / ( B z / | B z | ) , equal to the ratio of the Larmor radius R L = k T e / m e B z 2 to a characteristic scale of the magnetic field variation L B = B z / | B z | . The analysis of δ is important because for effective plasma magnetization it is not enough to have a sufficiently large magnetic field, but it is also required that the electrons can make a full revolution in the magnetic field before they leave the region of their localization. This can be a limiting factor in femtosecond laser plasma due to the small interaction volume and high gradients of the generated magnetic field. In particular, this is one of the limiting factors for the generation of magnetized plasma by pulses with a duration of less than 100 fs.
Within the discussed range of parameters, however, such a problem does not arise, although, as can be seen from Figure 3, the region in which δ < 1 (depicted in blue at Figure 3c,f,i) turns out to be remarkably smaller than the region in which σ > 1 (depicted in red at Figure 3b,e,h) and β < 1 (depicted in blue at Figure 3a,d,g).
Despite this, it can be seen that at the beginning of the interaction, the plasma is non-magnetized (Figure 3b). However, by the arrival of the radiation maximum, a noticeable region of cold magnetized plasma appears (Figure 3d,e), which further begins to expand (Figure 3g,h). The achieved values of σ are relatively small and do not exceed 10.
Achievement of larger values can be expected at higher intensities; therefore, we performed calculations in the range of intensities 3 × 10 19 10 21 W/cm2. The results are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that at low intensities (Figure 4a–c) no magnetized plasma is formed. Although there is a noticeable region of low electron temperature in the sheath, the magnetic field is too weak to exceed the rest energy density of the electrons. With an increase in intensity, the plasma expands with increasingly high speeds, which is in accordance with the theory of collisionless plasma expansion into vacuum [27,28]. The magnitude of the generated magnetic fields also increases, and a significant region of cold magnetized plasma is formed. In this case, the degree of magnetization also increases and reaches σ 10 for 10 21 W/cm2. Simultaneously, the value of δ remains small.
Furthermore, note that efficient magnetization of the expanding sheath was observed only for relatively long pulses with the duration exceeding 400 fs. The case of a shorter 100 fs pulse is shown at Figure 5. The shown instant of time is corresponding to a moment of a peak intensity arrival. For such a short laser pulse, even at the highest investigated intensity of 10 21 W/cm2, there is not enough time for the sheath to expand significantly (Figure 5a) and the electrons are still relativistically hot all over the sheath (Figure 5b), leading to high β parameter (Figure 5d). Moreover, despite the fact that the magnetic field is relatively high ( B z 500 MG at the peak, which should be compared to 800 MG for the same intensity for 700 fs pulse as shown at Figure 2), the weakly expanded sheath is rather dense so that the magnetization parameter σ < 1 (Figure 5e). Finally, due to a small dimension of the sheath the parameter δ < 1 as well (Figure 5f). An exact pulse duration sufficient to obtain the magnetized plasmas depends on the pulse intensity and likely on the details of interaction but it seems that in a wide set of parameters it lays somewhere between 100 and 500 fs.

4. Discussion

Concluding, our numerical simulation showed that as a result of irradiation of thin (approximately a few microns thick) foils by relativistically intense laser pulses with a duration of several hundred femtoseconds, an expanding plasma sheath is formed on the rear side of the target, the conditions in which correspond to a cold magnetized plasma with parameters β 0.01 0.1 and σ 1 –10. To create such conditions, an intensity higher than 10 20 W/cm2 and a pulse duration higher than 100–400 fs are required; conditions that are already available in experiments. To organize magnetic reconnection, two pulses are required, which are focused at a distance of about 50–100 μm from each other. This opens up new possibilities for the study of relativistic magnetic reconnection in the laboratory.
Additionally, we note that it can be expected that next-generation laser facilities carrying hundreds of joules in sub-picosecond pulses will be able to create conditions in which the effects of radiation cooling and generation of electron–positron pairs become observable. Recently, it has been proposed that they can play an important role in relativistic magnetic reconnection [29,30]. The study of such a possibility is an interesting possible subject of a future work.

Funding

This research was supported by Center of Excellence “Center of Photonics” funded by The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, contract 075-15-2020-906. The simulations were performed on resources provided by the Joint Supercomputer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Remington, B.; Drake, R.; Ryutov, D. Experimental astrophysics with high power lasers and Z pinches. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2006, 78, 755–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bulanov, S.V.; Esirkepov, T.Z.; Kando, M.; Koga, J.; Kondo, K.; Korn, G. On the problems of relativistic laboratory astrophysics and fundamental physics with super powerful lasers. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2015, 41, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nilson, P.M.; Willingale, L.; Kaluza, M.C.; Kamperidis, C.; Minardi, S.; Wei, M.S.; Fernandes, P.; Notley, M.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Sherlock, M.; et al. Magnetic Reconnection and Plasma Dynamics in Two-Beam Laser-Solid Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 255001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Fox, W.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Germaschewski, K. Fast Magnetic Reconnection in Laser-Produced Plasma Bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 215003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fiksel, G.; Fox, W.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Barnak, D.H.; Chang, P.Y.; Germaschewski, K.; Hu, S.X.; Nilson, P.M. Magnetic Reconnection between Colliding Magnetized Laser-Produced Plasma Plumes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 105003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Rosenberg, M.J.; Li, C.K.; Fox, W.; Zylstra, A.B.; Stoeckl, C.; Séguin, F.H.; Frenje, J.A.; Petrasso, R.D. Slowing of Magnetic Reconnection Concurrent with Weakening Plasma Inflows and Increasing Collisionality in Strongly Driven Laser-Plasma Experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 205004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Matteucci, J.; Fox, W.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Schaeffer, D.B.; Moissard, C.; Germaschewski, K.; Fiksel, G.; Hu, S.X. Biermann-Battery-Mediated Magnetic Reconnection in 3D Colliding Plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 095001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Lyubarsky, Y.E. On the relativistic magnetic reconnection. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2005, 358, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Raymond, A.E.; Dong, C.F.; McKelvey, A.; Zulick, C.; Alexander, N.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Campbell, P.T.; Chen, H.; Chvykov, V.; Del Rio, E.; et al. Relativistic-electron-driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory. Phys. Rev. E 2018, 98, 043207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mourou, G.; Tajima, T.; Bulanov, S. Optics in the relativistic regime. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2006, 78, 309–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Law, K.F.F.; Abe, Y.; Morace, A.; Arikawa, Y.; Sakata, S.; Lee, S.; Matsuo, K.; Morita, H.; Ochiai, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Relativistic magnetic reconnection in laser laboratory for testing an emission mechanism of hard-state black hole system. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 102, 033202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gu, Y.J.; Klimo, O.; Kumar, D.; Bulanov, S.V.; Esirkepov, T.Z.; Weber, S.; Korn, G. Fast magnetic field annihilation driven by two laser pulses in underdense plasma. Phys. Plasmas 2015, 22, 103113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, Y.J.; Yu, Q.; Klimo, O.; Esirkepov, T.Z.; Bulanov, S.V.; Weber, S.; Korn, G. Fast magnetic energy dissipation in relativistic plasma induced by high order laser modes. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 2016, 4, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gu, Y.J.; Klimo, O.; Kumar, D.; Liu, Y.; Singh, S.K.; Esirkepov, T.Z.; Bulanov, S.V.; Weber, S.; Korn, G. Fast magnetic-field annihilation in the relativistic collisionless regime driven by two ultrashort high-intensity laser pulses. Phys. Rev. E 2016, 93, 013203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gu, Y.J.; Bulanov, S.S.; Korn, G.; Bulanov, S.V. Splitter target for controlling magnetic reconnection in relativistic laser plasma interactions. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2018, 60, 044020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gu, Y.J.; Pegoraro, F.; Sasorov, P.V.; Golovin, D.; Yogo, A.; Korn, G.; Bulanov, S.V. Electromagnetic Burst Generation during Annihilation of Magnetic Field in Relativistic Laser-Plasma Interaction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gu, Y.J.; Bulanov, S.V. Magnetic field annihilation and charged particle acceleration in ultra-relativistic laser plasmas. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yi, L.; Shen, B.; Pukhov, A.; Fülöp, T. Relativistic magnetic reconnection driven by a laser interacting with a micro-scale plasma slab. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Brunel, F. Anomalous absorption of high intensity subpicosecond laser pulses. Phys. Fluids 1988, 31, 2714–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mulser, P.; Weng, S.M.; Liseykina, T. Analysis of the Brunel model and resulting hot electron spectra. Phys. Plasmas 2012, 19, 043301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liseykina, T.; Mulser, P.; Murakami, M. Collisionless absorption, hot electron generation, and energy scaling in intense laser-target interaction. Phys. Plasmas 2015, 22, 033302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wilks, S.C.; Langdon, A.B.; Cowan, T.E.; Roth, M.; Singh, M.; Hatchett, S.; Key, M.H.; Pennington, D.; MacKinnon, A.; Snavely, R.A. Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser-solid interactions. Phys. Plasmas 2001, 8, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Robinson, A.P.L.; Foster, P.; Adams, D.; Carroll, D.C.; Dromey, B.; Hawkes, S.; Kar, S.; Li, Y.T.; Markey, K.; McKenna, P.; et al. Spectral modification of laser-accelerated proton beams by self-generated magnetic fields. New J. Phys. 2009, 11, 083108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nakatsutsumi, M.; Sentoku, Y.; Korzhimanov, A.; Chen, S.N.; Buffechoux, S.; Kon, A.; Atherton, B.; Audebert, P.; Geissel, M.; Hurd, L.; et al. Self-generated surface magnetic fields inhibit laser-driven sheath acceleration of high-energy protons. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, H.; Zhang, Z.M.; Zhang, B.; Hong, W.; He, S.K.; Meng, L.B.; Qi, W.; Cui, B.; Zhou, W.M. Investigation of magnetic inhibition effect on ion acceleration at high laser intensities. Matter Radiat. Extrem. 2021, 6, 044401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Surmin, I.A.; Bastrakov, S.I.; Efimenko, E.S.; Gonoskov, A.A.; Korzhimanov, A.V.; Meyerov, I.B. Particle-in-Cell laser-plasma simulation on Xeon Phi coprocessors. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2016, 202, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gurevich, A.V.; Pariiskaya, L.V.; Pitaevskii, L.P. Self-similar motion of rarefied plasma. Sov. Phys. JETP 1966, 22, 449–454. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mora, P.; Pellat, R. Self-similar expansion of a plasma into a vacuum. Phys. Fluids 1979, 22, 2300–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hakobyan, H.; Philippov, A.; Spitkovsky, A. Effects of Synchrotron Cooling and Pair Production on Collisionless Relativistic Reconnection. Astrophys. J. 2019, 877, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hakobyan, H.; Petropoulou, M.; Spitkovsky, A.; Sironi, L. Secondary Energization in Compressing Plasmoids during Magnetic Reconnection. Astrophys. J. 2021, 912, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distributions of electron concentration (left column), electron temperature (central column) and transverse magnetic field (right column) at (ac) t = 0 fs, (df) t = 500 fs, (gi) t = 1000 fs, (jl) t = 1500 fs, and (mo) t = 2000 fs after start of the simulation. The parameters of the simulation are in the text.
Figure 1. Distributions of electron concentration (left column), electron temperature (central column) and transverse magnetic field (right column) at (ac) t = 0 fs, (df) t = 500 fs, (gi) t = 1000 fs, (jl) t = 1500 fs, and (mo) t = 2000 fs after start of the simulation. The parameters of the simulation are in the text.
Applsci 11 11966 g001
Figure 2. Time evolution of the peak magnetic field generated in the expanding plasma sheath for different laser intensities.
Figure 2. Time evolution of the peak magnetic field generated in the expanding plasma sheath for different laser intensities.
Applsci 11 11966 g002
Figure 3. Distributions of β parameter (left column), σ parameter (central column) and δ parameter (right column) at (ac) t = 1000 fs, (df) t = 1500 fs, and (gi) t = 2000 fs after start of the simulation. The parameters of the simulation are the same as at Figure 1.
Figure 3. Distributions of β parameter (left column), σ parameter (central column) and δ parameter (right column) at (ac) t = 1000 fs, (df) t = 1500 fs, and (gi) t = 2000 fs after start of the simulation. The parameters of the simulation are the same as at Figure 1.
Applsci 11 11966 g003
Figure 4. The same as at the Figure 3 but at t = 2500 fs after start of the simulations for laser intensities of (ac) 3 × 10 19 W/cm2, (df) 10 20 W/cm2, (gi) 3 × 10 20 W/cm2, and (jl) 10 21 W/cm2.
Figure 4. The same as at the Figure 3 but at t = 2500 fs after start of the simulations for laser intensities of (ac) 3 × 10 19 W/cm2, (df) 10 20 W/cm2, (gi) 3 × 10 20 W/cm2, and (jl) 10 21 W/cm2.
Applsci 11 11966 g004
Figure 5. Distributions of (a) electron concentration, (b) electron temperature, (c) transverse magnetic field, (d) β parameter, (e) σ parameter, and (f) δ parameter in the case of 100 fs, 10 21 W/cm2 laser pulse at t = 500 fs after start of the simulation.
Figure 5. Distributions of (a) electron concentration, (b) electron temperature, (c) transverse magnetic field, (d) β parameter, (e) σ parameter, and (f) δ parameter in the case of 100 fs, 10 21 W/cm2 laser pulse at t = 500 fs after start of the simulation.
Applsci 11 11966 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korzhimanov, A.V. Generation of Cold Magnetized Relativistic Plasmas at the Rear of Thin Foils Irradiated by Ultra-High-Intensity Laser Pulses. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411966

AMA Style

Korzhimanov AV. Generation of Cold Magnetized Relativistic Plasmas at the Rear of Thin Foils Irradiated by Ultra-High-Intensity Laser Pulses. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(24):11966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korzhimanov, Artem V. 2021. "Generation of Cold Magnetized Relativistic Plasmas at the Rear of Thin Foils Irradiated by Ultra-High-Intensity Laser Pulses" Applied Sciences 11, no. 24: 11966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop