Next Article in Journal
Method of Multilevel Adaptive Synthesis of Monitoring Object Knowledge Graphs
Previous Article in Journal
A Two-Phase Approach for Predicting Highway Passenger Volume
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomechanical Consequences of Tibial Insert Thickness after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Musculoskeletal Models in a Clinical Perspective

by
Carlo Albino Frigo
1,2
1
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, I-20133 Milan, Italy
2
Gait Analysis Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, I-20161 Milan, Italy
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(14), 6250; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146250
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 June 2021 / Published: 6 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Musculoskeletal Models in a Clinical Perspective)
After the pioneering work of Scott Delp and colleagues dated 1990 (An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures, [1]) a huge amount of work aimed at creating a virtual representation of the human movement has been completed. The increased computational power and graphics capacity of computers have been fundamental in this process. Early in 2008, a very ambitious project was launched at the European level, with the objective of modelling all of the physiological phenomena of a human being: The Virtual Physiological Human [2]. The evolution of musculoskeletal modelling can be seen as a component of that ambitious project. Musculoskeletal modelling consists of reproducing the anatomical structure and the dynamic behaviour of a human subject, or a part of it, and simulating the effects of movement and forces upon the internal components. The interest in these techniques is very wide, spanning from sports biomechanics to ergonomics and clinical applications. In these different areas, the objectives and the methods can be different, but in all cases, musculoskeletal models can provide information that could not be obtained in other ways, considering, for example, the internal forces in a joint, the tension of the ligaments and the effects of muscle contractions. This Special Issue was particularly aimed at collecting experience and points of view concerning the potential of the musculoskeletal models in clinical applications. The review paper of Killen et al. [3] makes a point on the impact that musculoskeletal models and dynamic simulation have on clinical practice and in rehabilitation in particular. The perspective paper of BJ Fregly [4] provides a vision of what the role of musculoskeletal modelling in clinics could be and the steps required to make these techniques widely available and useful. Other papers report on interesting examples of problems in which musculoskeletal models have been fundamental to answer clinical questions: the complex mechanism of swallowing [5], where the role of different muscles is very difficult to investigate in other ways; the problem of lower back pain in pregnancy [6]; the question of the effectiveness of a particular reinforcement treatment for the abductor muscles in subjects affected by hip dysplasia after total hip joint replacement [7]. One paper [8] then provides an example of how the dynamic simulation can help us to understand the role of muscles during walking and answer a typical ‘what if?’ question: what happens if the Rectus Femoris muscle increases or decreases its activity in a specific phase of the gait cycle? Two more papers lay in the original mainstream of musculoskeletal modelling applications, that is, clinical orthopaedics. One faces the technical problem of understanding the effect of changing the tibial insert thickness in the knee joint arthroplasty [9], and the other reports on the forces occurring on the knee joint ligaments and bone surfaces while walking [10]. The papers collected in this Special Issue are obviously far from covering all of the possible applications of musculoskeletal models, but they do offer a demonstration of the usefulness of the modelling approach. This is truly a fast-growing discipline that is producing an enhancement of knowledge in many different areas. Being conscious of the potential effects of this evolution, which could be in terms of the prevention of musculoskeletal damage, treatment planning, or load assessment, is fundamental for improving the quality of health care services offered to people affected by neuromusculoskeletal diseases. This Special Issue represents a contribution to the promotion of the continuous improvement and usage of this advanced methodology.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Delp, S.L.; Loan, J.P.; Hoy, M.G.; Zajac, F.E.; Topp, E.L.; Rosen, J.M. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Coveney, P.V.; Diaz, V.; Hunter, P.; Kohl, P.; Viceconti, M. The Virtual Physiological Human. Interface Focus 2011, 1, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Killen, B.A.; Falisse, A.; De Groote, F.; Jonkers, I. In Silico-Enhanced Treatment and Rehabilitation Planning for Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: Can Musculoskeletal Modelling and Dynamic Simulations Really Impact Current Clinical Practice? Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fregly, B.J. A Conceptual Blueprint for Making Neuromusculoskeletal Models Clinically Useful. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hashimoto, T.; Urabe, M.; Chee-Sheng, F.; Murakoshi, A.; Kikuchi, T.; Michiwaki, Y.; Koike, T. Development of a Musculoskeletal Model of Hyolaryngeal Elements for Understanding Pharyngeal Swallowing Mechanics. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morino, S.; Yamashita, M.; Umezaki, F.; Hatanaka, H.; Takahashi, M. Assessment of Motion and Muscle Activation Impacts on Low Back Pain during Pregnancy Using an Inertial Measurement Unit. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valente, G.; Taddei, F.; Leardini, A.; Benedetti, M.G. Effects of Hip Abductor Strengthening on Musculoskeletal Loading in Hip Dysplasia Patients after Total Hip Replacement. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frigo, C.A.; Wyss, C.; Brunner, R. The Effects of the Rectus Femoris Muscle on Knee and Foot Kinematics during the Swing Phase of Normal Walking. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tzanetis, P.; Marra, M.A.; Fluit, R.; Koopman, B.; Verdonschot, N. Biomechanical Consequences of Tibial Insert Thickness after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frigo, A.C.; Donno, L. The Effects of External Loads and Muscle Forces on the Knee Joint Ligaments during Walking: A Musculoskeletal Model Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frigo, C.A. Special Issue: Musculoskeletal Models in a Clinical Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146250

AMA Style

Frigo CA. Special Issue: Musculoskeletal Models in a Clinical Perspective. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(14):6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146250

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frigo, Carlo Albino. 2021. "Special Issue: Musculoskeletal Models in a Clinical Perspective" Applied Sciences 11, no. 14: 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146250

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop