Improvement of Performance Level of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Using Tuned Mass Damper System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Optimal Design of the TMD System
3. Passive Control Systems
4. Water Cycle Algorithm (WCA)
5. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA)
6. Modeling and Verification
7. Results and Discussion
7.1. Optimization of the Parameters of the TMD System
7.2. The Structural Seismic Performance
7.3. The Results of the Incremental Dynamic Analysis
7.3.1. The Results of IDA for the Drift Ratio
7.3.2. The Results of IDA for the Maximum Displacement
7.3.3. The Results of IDA for the Maximum Base Shear
7.3.4. The Results of IDA for the Maximum Acceleration of the Structure
7.4. The Results for the Artificial Earthquake
7.4.1. Seismic Performance of the Controlled and Uncontrolled Structures Exposed to the Artificial Earthquake
7.4.2. IDA for the Dynamic Performance of the Controlled and Uncontrolled Structures Exposed to the Artificial Earthquake
7.4.3. Investigation of the Performance Level of the Structure Subjected to the Artificial Earthquake
- Immediate Occupancy ≤ 0.7%;
- 0.7% ≤ Life Safety ≤ 2.5%;
- 2.5% ≤ Collapse Prevention ≤ 5%.
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Elwardany, H.; Seleemah, A.; Jankowski, R. Seismic pounding behavior of multi-story buildings in series considering the effect of infill panels. Eng. Struct. 2017, 144, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elwardany, H.; Seleemah, A.; Jankowski, R.; El-Khoriby, S. Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic pounding between steel frame buildings considering the effect of infill panels. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2019, 17, 6165–6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jankowski, R. Pounding between superstructure segments in multi-supported elevated bridge with three-span continuous deck under 3D non-uniform earthquake excitation. J. Earthq. Tsunami 2015, 9, 1550012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sołtysik, B.; Jankowski, R. Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 2013, 6, 429–433. [Google Scholar]
- Kamgar, R.; Rahgozar, R. Determination of optimum location for flexible outrigger systems in non-uniform tall buildings using energy method. Int. J. Optim. Civ. Eng. 2015, 5, 433–444. [Google Scholar]
- Tavakoli, R.; Kamgar, R.; Rahgozar, R. The best location of belt truss system in tall buildings using multiple criteria subjected to blast loading. Civ. Eng. J. 2018, 5, 1338–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavakoli, R.; Kamgar, R.; Rahgozar, R. Seismic performance of outrigger–belt truss system considering soil–structure interaction. Int. J. Adv. Struc. Eng. 2019, 11, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kamgar, R.; Shojaee, S.; Rahgozar, R. Rehabilitation of tall buildings by active control system subjected to critical seismic excitation. Asi. J. Civ. Eng. 2015, 16, 819–833. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, L.L.; Wu, L.Y.; Huang, H.H.; Chang, C.H.; Lien, K.H. Optimal design theories of tuned mass dampers with nonlinear viscous damping. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2009, 8, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, Z.; Jinting, W.; Feng, J.; Liqiao, L. Control performance comparison between tuned liquid damper and tuned liquid column damper using real-time hybrid simulation. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2019, 18, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Housner, G.W.; Bergman, L.A.; Caughey, T.K.; Chassiakos, A.G.; Claus, R.O.; Masri, S.F.; Skelton, R.E.; Soong, T.T.; Spencer, B.F.; Yao, J.T.P. Structural control: Past, present, and future. J. Eng. Mech. 1997, 123, 897–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamgar, R.; Askari Dolatabad, Y.; Babadaei Samani, M.R. Seismic optimization of steel shear wall using shape memory alloy. Int. J. Optim. Civ. Eng. 2019, 9, 671–687. [Google Scholar]
- Lasowicz, N.; Kwiecień, A.; Jankowski, R. Experimental study on the effectiveness of polymer damper in damage reduction of temporary steel grandstand. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 628, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falborski, T.; Jankowski, R. Experimental study on effectiveness of a prototype seismic isolation system made of polymeric bearings. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miari, M.; Choong, K.K.; Jankowski, R. Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings: Identification of parameters, soil interaction issues and mitigation measures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2019, 121, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamgar, R.; Khatibinia, M.; Khatibinia, M. Optimization criteria for design of tuned mass dampers including soil–structure interaction effect. Int. J. Optim. Civ. Eng. 2019, 9, 213–232. [Google Scholar]
- Kamgar, R.; Samea, P.; Khatibinia, M. Optimizing parameters of tuned mass damper subjected to critical earthquake. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 2018, 27, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaveh, A.; Mohammadi, S.; Hosseini, O.K.; Keyhani, A.; Kalatjari, V.R. Optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications using charged system search. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civil Eng. 2015, 39, 21. [Google Scholar]
- Khatibinia, M.; Gholami, H.; Kamgar, R. Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. Int. J. Dyn. Control 2018, 6, 1094–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamgar, R.; Gholami, F.; Zarif Sanayei, H.R.; Heidarzadeh, H. Modified tuned liquid dampers for seismic protection of buildings considering soil-structure interaction effects. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2020, 44, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soong, T.T.; Dargush, G.F. Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Mualla, I.H.; Belev, B. Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation. Eng. Struc. 2002, 24, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarrahi, H.; Asadi, A.; Khatibinia, M.; Etedali, S. Optimal design of rotational friction dampers for improving seismic performance of inelastic structures. J. Buil. Eng. 2020, 27, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miguel, L.F.F.; Miguel, L.F.F.; Lopea, R.H. Simultaneous optimization of force and placement of friction dampers under seismic loading. Eng. Opt. 2016, 48, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, H.; Zhang, R.; Weng, D.; Ge, Q.; Wang, C.; Islam, M.M. Design method of structural retrofitting using viscous dampers based on elastic-plastic response reduction curve. Eng. Struc. 2020, 208, 109917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akehashi, H.; Takewaki, I. Comparative investigation on optimal viscous damper placement for elastic-plastic MDOF structures: Transfer function amplitude for double impulse. Soil Dyn. Earth. Eng. 2020, 130105987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naeem, A.; Kim, J. Seismic performance evaluation of spring viscous damper cable system. Eng. Struc. 2018, 176, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, M.; Rui, X.; Zhu, W.; Yang, F.; Gu, L.; Zhu, H. Design, modelling and testing of a novel high-torque magnetorheological damper. Smart Mat. Struc. 2020, 29, 025024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farahmand Azar, B.; Veladi, H.; Talatahari, S.; Raeesi, F. Optimal design of magnetorheological damper based on tuning Bouc-Wen model parameters using hybrid algorithm. Struc. Eng. 2020, 24, 867–878. [Google Scholar]
- Petrini, F.; Giaralis, A.; Wang, Z. Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting. Eng. Struc. 2020, 204, 109904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masnata, C.; Matteo, A.D.; Adam, C.; Pirrotta, A. Smart structures through nontraditional design of tuned mass damper inerter for higher control of base isolated systems. Mech. Res. Comm. 2020, 105, 103513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, J.S.; McNamara, K.P.; Tiat, M.J.; Haskett, T.C. Series-type pendulum tuned mass damper-tuned sloshing damper. J. Vib. Ac. 2020, 142, 011003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandomi, A.H.; Yang, X.S.; Talatahari, S.; Alavi, A.H. Metaheuristic algorithms in modeling and optimization. Metaheuristic Appl. Struct. Infrastruct. 2013, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Kaveh, A.; Pirgholizadeh, S.; Khadem, H.O. Semi-active tuned mass damper performance with optimized fuzzy controller using CSS algorithm. Asian J. Civil Eng. 2015, 16, 587–606. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, C.L.; Chen, Y.T.; Chung, L.L.; Wang, Y.P. Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers. Eng. Struct. 2006, 28, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marano, G.C.; Greco, R.; Trentadue, F.; Chiaia, B. Constrained reliability-based optimization of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic control. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2007, 44, 7370–7388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvi, J.; Rizzi, E. Optimum tuning of Tuned Mass Dampers for frame structures under earthquake excitation. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2015, 22, 707–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tigli, O.F. Optimum vibration absorber (tuned mass damper) design for linear damped systems subjected to random loads. J. Sound Vib. 2012, 331, 3035–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.K. Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with tuned mass dampers. J. Eng. Mech. 2018, 134, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nigdeli, S.M.; Bekdaş, G.; Sayin, B. Optimum tuned mass damper design using harmony search with comparison of classical methods. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1863, 540004. [Google Scholar]
- Bertero, V.V. Strength and Deformation Capacities of Buildings under Extreme Environments; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Vamvatsikos, D.; Cornell, C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2002, 31, 491–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.W.; Chopra, A.K. Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2006, 35, 1853–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Olivares, G.; Tomás Espín, A. Design of planar semi-rigid steel frames using genetic algorithms and component method. J. Cons. Steel Res. 2013, 88, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Olivares, G.; Tomás Espín, A. Improvements in meta-heuristic algorithms for minimum cost design of reinforced concrete rectangular sections under compression and biaxial bending. Eng. Struc. 2017, 130, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilondi, M.R.S.; Yazdani, H.; Khatibinia, M. Seismic energy dissipation-based optimum design of tuned mass dampers. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2018, 58, 2517–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzoni, S.; McKenna, F.; Scott, M.H.; Fenves, G.L. The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES) User Command-Language Manual; Pennsylvania State University: University Park, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- FEMA-356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Connor, J.J.; Laflamme, S. Applications of Active Control. In Structural Motion Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 347–386. [Google Scholar]
- Naderpour, H.; Naji, N.; Burkacki, D.; Jankowski, R. Seismic response of high-rise buildings equipped with base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khatami, S.M.; Naderpour, H.; Razavi, S.M.N.; Barros, R.C.; Jakubczyk-Gałczyńska, A.; Jankowski, R. Study on methods to control interstory deflections. Geosciences 2020, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eskandar, H.; Sadollah, A.; Bahreininejad, A.; Hamdi, M. Water cycle algorithm–A novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Comput. Struct. 2012, 110, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siemaszko, A.; Jakubczyk-Gałczyńska, A.; Jankowski, R. The idea of using Bayesian networks in forecasting impact of traffic-induced vibrations transmitted through the ground on residential buildings. Geosciences 2019, 9, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ibarra, L.F.; Krawinkler, H. Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic Excitations; Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005; pp. 29–51. [Google Scholar]
- Ibarra, L.F.; Medina, R.A.; Krawinkler, H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2005, 34, 1489–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lignos, D.G.; Krawinkler, H. Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. J. Struct. Eng. 2011, 137, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krawinkler, H.; Zareian, F.; Lignos, D.G.; Ibarra, L.F. Prediction of collapse of structures under earthquake excitations. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering COMPDYN 2009, Rhodes, Greece, 22–24 June 2009. paper no. CD449. [Google Scholar]
- Kanai, K. An empirical formula for the spectrum of strong earthquake motions. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 1961, 39, 85–95. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
- Mohebbi, M.; Shakeri, K.; Ghanbarpour, Y.; Majzoub, H. Designing optimal multiple tuned mass dampers using genetic algorithms (GAs) for mitigating the seismic response of structures. J. Vib. Control 2013, 19, 605–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajimi, H. A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, 11–18 July 1960; pp. 781–797. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Chen, G.; Lou, M. Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers considering soil–structure interaction. Eart. Eng. Struc. Dyn. 1999, 28, 1219–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UBC-97, Uniform Building Code; International Conference of Building Officials: Whittier, CA, USA, 1997.
- Kamgar, R.; Rahgozar, R. Determination of critical excitation in seismic analysis of structures. Earth. Struc. 2015, 9, 875–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.K.; Johnson, J. Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with multiple tuned mass dampers. J. Eng. Mech. 2009, 135, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mode Number | Natural Periods of Vibration (rad/s) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Wong [39] | Bilondi et al. [46] | Present Study | |
1 | 5.15 | 5.07 | 5.07 |
2 | 14.28 | 13.96 | 14.22 |
3 | 25.13 | 25.13 | 25.13 |
4 | 34.91 | 34.91 | 34.91 |
5 | 44.88 | 44.88 | 44.88 |
6 | 57.12 | 57.12 | 57.12 |
Abbreviation | AE | NE3 | NE2 | NE1 | FE3 | FE2 | FE1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earthquake | An artificial earthquake | Kocaeli Turkey | Gazli USSR | Chi-Chi Taiwan | Superstition Hills-02 | San Fernando | Duzce Turkey |
Station | --- | Arcelik | Karakyr | CHY101 | El Centro Imp. Co. Cent | LA—Hollywood Stor FF | Bolu |
PGA (g) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
PGA/PGV (g·s/m) | 0.206 | 0.601 | 1.277 | 0.630 | 0.743 | 1.035 | 1.32 |
Strong ground motion duration (s) | 18 | 13.265 | 6.956 | 28.55 | 27.99 | 13.15 | 8.55 |
Predominant Period (s) | 0.2 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 1.08 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.32 |
Total time duration (s) | 19.98 | 29.995 | 13.0878 | 88.995 | 59.99 | 79.44 | 55.89 |
Arias Intensity (m/s) | 33.311 | 15.370 | 7.599 | 12.291 | 8.646 | 13.396 | 6.806 |
Earthquake | |||
---|---|---|---|
FE1 | 404.94 | 770.18 | 180 |
FE2 | 543.76 | 304.28 | 180 |
FE3 | 490.1 | 942.89 | 180 |
NE1 | 421.67 | 1753.1 | 180 |
NE2 | 315.87 | 972.87 | 141 |
NE3 | 405.02 | 500.0 | 180 |
AE | 405.47 | 935.66 | 180 |
Earthquake | Average Reduction (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Displacement | Drift | Acceleration | Base Shear | |
FE1 | 5.78 | 5.02 | 8.10 | 2.61 |
FE2 | −20.56 | 25.08 | −5.25 | 0.81 |
FE3 | 11.14 | 6.53 | 10.06 | 2.75 |
NE1 | 14.81 | 10.96 | 3.15 | −2.49 |
NE2 | 12.26 | 4.18 | 9.03 | 0.65 |
NE3 | −31.34 | 42.92 | 19.69 | 3.49 |
AE | 31.55 | 19.42 | −5.23 | −1.12 |
O.F | Required Running Time (s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
O.F 1 | 405.47 | 935.66 | 180 | 997.854 |
O.F. 2 | 211.021 | 1130.6 | 122.87 | 865.528 |
O.F. 3 | 250.025 | 749.317 | 163.156 | 1114.548 |
Objective Function | Max. Roof Disp. (m) | Max. Roof Acc. (m/s2) | Max. Drift Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|
O.F 1 | 0.504 | 17.74 | 2.45 |
O.F. 2 | 0.509 | 17.52 | 2.82 |
O.F. 3 | 0.515 | 17.75 | 2.61 |
Earthquake | |||
---|---|---|---|
FFE3 | 263.34 | 130.87 | 91.08 |
NE2 | 170.78 | 89.06 | 59.28 |
AE | 84.21 | 2000 | 131.59 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dadkhah, M.; Kamgar, R.; Heidarzadeh, H.; Jakubczyk-Gałczyńska, A.; Jankowski, R. Improvement of Performance Level of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Using Tuned Mass Damper System. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3403. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103403
Dadkhah M, Kamgar R, Heidarzadeh H, Jakubczyk-Gałczyńska A, Jankowski R. Improvement of Performance Level of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Using Tuned Mass Damper System. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(10):3403. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103403
Chicago/Turabian StyleDadkhah, Masoud, Reza Kamgar, Heisam Heidarzadeh, Anna Jakubczyk-Gałczyńska, and Robert Jankowski. 2020. "Improvement of Performance Level of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Using Tuned Mass Damper System" Applied Sciences 10, no. 10: 3403. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103403