Next Article in Journal
Erratum: Gliß, J.; et al. Pyplis–A Python Software Toolbox for the Analysis of SO2 Camera Images for Emission Rate Retrievals from Point Sources. Geosciences 2017, 7, 134
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulating the Influence of Buildings on Flood Inundation in Urban Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Ozone Depletion in Tropospheric Volcanic Plumes: From Halogen-Poor to Halogen-Rich Emissions
Previous Article in Special Issue
ENSO Index-Based Insurance for Agricultural Protection in Southern Peru
 
 
Article

Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results

Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2018, 8(2), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069
Received: 15 January 2018 / Revised: 7 February 2018 / Accepted: 10 February 2018 / Published: 11 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrological Hazard: Analysis and Prevention)
In the case of ungauged catchments, different procedures can be used to derive the design hydrograph and design peak discharge, which are crucial input data for the design of different hydrotechnical engineering structures, or the production of flood hazard maps. One of the possible approaches involves using a hydrological model where one can calculate the design hydrograph through the design of a rainfall event. This study investigates the impact of the design rainfall on the combined one-dimensional/two-dimensional (1D/2D) hydraulic modelling results. The Glinščica Stream catchment located in Slovenia (central Europe) is used as a case study. Ten different design rainfall events were compared for 10 and 100-year return periods, where we used Huff curves for the design rainfall event definition. The results indicate that the selection of the design rainfall event should be regarded as an important step, since the hydraulic modelling results for different scenarios differ significantly. In the presented experimental case study, the maximum flooded area extent was twice as large as the minimum one, and the maximum water velocity over flooded areas was more than 10 times larger than the minimum one. This can lead to the production of very different flood hazard maps, and consequently planning very different flood protection schemes. View Full-Text
Keywords: design storm; hydraulic modelling; flood hazards; Glinščica catchment; hydrological modelling; Huff curves; HEC-RAS design storm; hydraulic modelling; flood hazards; Glinščica catchment; hydrological modelling; Huff curves; HEC-RAS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bezak, N.; Šraj, M.; Rusjan, S.; Mikoš, M. Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results. Geosciences 2018, 8, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069

AMA Style

Bezak N, Šraj M, Rusjan S, Mikoš M. Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results. Geosciences. 2018; 8(2):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bezak, Nejc, Mojca Šraj, Simon Rusjan, and Matjaž Mikoš. 2018. "Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results" Geosciences 8, no. 2: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop