Next Article in Journal
Gas Seepage-Induced Features in the Hypoxic/Anoxic, Shallow, Marine Environment of Amfilochia Bay, Amvrakikos Gulf (Western Greece)
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Prediction of Future Flood Risk: An Approach to the Effects of Climate Change
Previous Article in Special Issue
GIS Analysis and Spatial Networking Patterns in Upland Ancient Warfare: The Roman Conquest of Dacia
Open AccessReview

Documentation of Archaeology-Specific Workflow for Airborne LiDAR Data Processing

1
Institute of Classics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 3/II, 8010 Graz, Austria
2
Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2021, 11(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010026
Received: 1 December 2020 / Revised: 21 December 2020 / Accepted: 31 December 2020 / Published: 5 January 2021
Airborne LiDAR is a widely accepted tool for archaeological prospection. Over the last decade an archaeology-specific data processing workflow has been evolving, ranging from raw data acquisition and processing, point cloud processing and product derivation to archaeological interpretation, dissemination and archiving. Currently, though, there is no agreement on the specific steps or terminology. This workflow is an interpretative knowledge production process that must be documented as such to ensure the intellectual transparency and accountability required for evidence-based archaeological interpretation. However, this is rarely the case, and there are no accepted schemas, let alone standards, to do so. As a result, there is a risk that the data processing steps of the workflow will be accepted as a black box process and its results as “hard data”. The first step in documenting a scientific process is to define it. Therefore, this paper provides a critical review of existing archaeology-specific workflows for airborne LiDAR-derived topographic data processing, resulting in an 18-step workflow with consistent terminology. Its novelty and significance lies in the fact that the existing comprehensive studies are outdated and the newer ones focus on selected aspects of the workflow. Based on the updated workflow, a good practice example for its documentation is presented. View Full-Text
Keywords: archaeological prospection; airborne LiDAR; method; workflow; documentation archaeological prospection; airborne LiDAR; method; workflow; documentation
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Lozić, E.; Štular, B. Documentation of Archaeology-Specific Workflow for Airborne LiDAR Data Processing. Geosciences 2021, 11, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010026

AMA Style

Lozić E, Štular B. Documentation of Archaeology-Specific Workflow for Airborne LiDAR Data Processing. Geosciences. 2021; 11(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lozić, Edisa; Štular, Benjamin. 2021. "Documentation of Archaeology-Specific Workflow for Airborne LiDAR Data Processing" Geosciences 11, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010026

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop