Characterization of Basin-Scale Dynamic Storage–Discharge Relationship Using Daily GRACE Based Storage Anomaly Data
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Catchments and Preliminary Data Analysis
3. Theoretical Backgrounds
4. Results and Discussion
5. Summary and Concluding Remarks
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Basin ID | Latitude | Longitude | Area (km)2 | ||
1591400 | 39.26 | −77.05 | 59.31 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
1605500 | 38.64 | −79.34 | 463.61 | 0.51 | 0.46 |
1611500 | 39.58 | −78.31 | 1748.24 | 0.43 | 0.44 |
1632000 | 38.64 | −78.85 | 543.90 | 0.45 | 0.37 |
2013000 | 37.80 | −80.05 | 419.58 | 0.42 | 0.48 |
2020500 | 37.99 | −79.49 | 365.19 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
2053800 | 37.14 | −80.27 | 282.31 | 0.59 | 0.54 |
2111180 | 36.07 | −81.40 | 131.83 | 0.62 | 0.45 |
2111500 | 36.18 | −81.17 | 231.03 | 0.68 | 0.44 |
2143040 | 35.59 | −81.57 | 66.56 | 0.69 | 0.61 |
2152100 | 35.49 | −81.68 | 156.69 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
2160105 | 34.54 | −81.55 | 1965.80 | 0.66 | 0.34 |
2177000 | 34.81 | −83.31 | 536.13 | 0.77 | 0.45 |
2330450 | 34.68 | −83.73 | 115.77 | 0.71 | 0.38 |
2363000 | 31.59 | −85.78 | 1289.82 | 0.41 | 0.16 |
2482550 | 32.71 | −89.53 | 3486.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
3069500 | 43.13 | −112.52 | 1869.97 | 0.49 | 0.06 |
3170000 | 37.04 | −80.56 | 800.31 | 0.67 | 0.52 |
3179000 | 37.54 | −81.01 | 1023.05 | 0.64 | 0.52 |
3182500 | 38.19 | −80.13 | 1398.59 | 0.54 | 0.33 |
3237500 | 38.80 | −83.42 | 1002.33 | 0.74 | 0.50 |
3301500 | 37.77 | −85.70 | 3364.40 | 0.55 | 0.03 |
3303000 | 38.24 | −86.23 | 1232.84 | 0.65 | 0.45 |
3441000 | 35.27 | −82.71 | 104.64 | 0.64 | 0.27 |
3463300 | 35.83 | −82.18 | 112.15 | 0.65 | 0.40 |
3473000 | 36.65 | −81.84 | 784.77 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
3479000 | 36.24 | −81.82 | 238.54 | 0.59 | 0.37 |
3500000 | 35.15 | −83.38 | 362.60 | 0.77 | 0.42 |
6422500 | 44.14 | −103.46 | 244.50 | 0.90 | 0.28 |
6431500 | 44.48 | −103.86 | 427.35 | 0.60 | 0.70 |
7021000 | 37.15 | −90.08 | 1095.57 | 0.43 | 0.61 |
7050700 | 37.15 | −93.20 | 637.14 | 0.52 | 0.39 |
7056000 | 35.98 | −92.75 | 2147.10 | 0.32 | 0.08 |
7058000 | 36.63 | −92.31 | 1476.29 | 0.51 | 0.28 |
7148400 | 36.82 | −98.65 | 2543.37 | 0.55 | 0.43 |
7196900 | 35.88 | −94.49 | 105.15 | 0.66 | 0.12 |
7197000 | 35.92 | −94.84 | 808.08 | 0.42 | 0.28 |
7261500 | 34.87 | −93.66 | 1061.90 | 0.47 | 0.13 |
7268000 | 34.48 | −89.22 | 1362.33 | 0.55 | 0.29 |
8066200 | 30.72 | −94.96 | 365.19 | 0.45 | 0.27 |
8150700 | 30.66 | −99.11 | 8409.70 | 0.59 | 0.55 |
8153500 | 30.29 | −98.40 | 2411.28 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
9484600 | 32.04 | −110.68 | 1183.63 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
11055500 | 34.12 | −117.14 | 43.77 | 0.85 | 0.39 |
11109600 | 34.52 | −118.76 | 963.48 | 0.64 | 0.33 |
11451100 | 39.17 | −122.62 | 155.92 | 0.87 | 0.44 |
14034470 | 45.34 | −119.52 | 175.08 | 0.18 | 0.17 |
14307620 | 44.06 | −123.88 | 1522.91 | 0.83 | 0.41 |
References
- Behrangi, A.; Khakbaz, B.; Jaw, T.C.; AghaKouchak, A.; Hsu, K.-L.; Sorooshian, S. Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. J. Hydrol. 2011, 397, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashouri, H.; Hsu, K.-L.; Sorooshian, S.; Braithwaite, D.K.; Knapp, K.R.; Cecil, L.D.; Nelson, B.R.; Prat, O.P. PERSIANN-CDR: Daily Precipitation Climate Data Record from Multisatellite Observations for Hydrological and Climate Studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2015, 96, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, E.; Gascoin, S.; Grusson, Y.; Murgue, C.; Bardeau, M.; Anctil, F.; Ferrant, S.; Lardy, R.; Le Moigne, P.; Leenhardt, D.; et al. On the Use of Hydrological Models and Satellite Data to Study the Water Budget of River Basins Affected by Human Activities: Examples from the Garonne Basin of France. Surv. Geophys. 2016, 37, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, J.; Sun, W.; Yang, G.; Zhang, D. Hydrological Analysis Using Satellite Remote Sensing Big Data and CREST Model. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 9006–9016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brocca, L.; Melone, F.; Moramarco, T.; Wagner, W.; Naeimi, V.; Bartalis, Z.; Hasenauer, S. Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crow, W.T.; Ryu, D. A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bindlish, R.; Crow, W.T.; Jackson, T.J. Role of Passive Microwave Remote Sensing in Improving Flood Forecasts. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008, 6, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syed, T.H.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Rodell, M.; Chen, J.; Wilson, C.R. Analysis of terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE and GLDAS. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, H.; Ma, J.; Zheng, W.; Zeng, J. Comparison of soil moisture in GLDAS model simulations and in situ observations over the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2016, 121, 2658–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reager, J.T.; Thomas, B.F.; Famiglietti, J.S. River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time. Nat. Geosci. 2014, 7, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B.; Marani, M. ‘Universal’ recession curves and their geomorphological interpretation. Adv. Water Resour. 2014, 65, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B.; Kumar, D.N. Study of dynamic behaviour of recession curves. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 28, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B.; Kumar, D.N. Estimation of ‘drainable’ storage—A geomorphological approach. Adv. Water Resour. 2015, 77, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rzepecka, Z.; Birylo, M. Groundwater Storage Changes Derived from GRACE and GLDAS on Smaller River Basins—A Case Study in Poland. Geosciences 2020, 10, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frappart, F.; Ramillien, G. Monitoring Groundwater Storage Changes Using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Satellite Mission: A Review. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, P.-W.; Massoud, E.C.; Farr, T.G.; Lundgren, P.; Famiglietti, J.S. Monitoring Groundwater Change in California’s Central Valley Using Sentinel-1 and GRACE Observations. Geosciences 2019, 9, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, A.C.; Reager, J.T.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Rodell, M. A GRACE-based water storage deficit approach for hydrological drought characterization. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asoka, A.; Gleeson, T.; Wada, Y.; Mishra, V. Relative contribution of monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in India. Nat. Geosci. 2017, 10, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sproles, E.A.; Leibowitz, S.G.; Reager, J.T.; Wigington, P.J.; Famiglietti, J.; Patil, S. GRACE storage-runoff hystereses reveal the dynamics of regional watersheds. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2015, 19, 3253–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tapley, B.D.; Watkins, M.M.; Flechtner, F.; Reigber, C.; Bettadpur, S.; Rodell, M.; Sasgen, I.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Landerer, F.W.; Chambers, D.P.; et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richey, A.S.; Thomas, B.F.; Lo, M.; Reager, J.T.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Voss, K.; Swenson, S.; Rodell, M. Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 51, 5217–5238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, K.; Shen, C. Full-flow-regime storage-streamflow correlation patterns provide insights into hydrologic functioning over the continental US. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 53, 8064–8083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macedo, H.E.; Beighley, R.E.; David, C.H.; Reager, J.T. Using GRACE in a streamflow recession to determine drainable water storage in the Mississippi River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 3269–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gouweleeuw, B.T.; Kvas, A.; Grüber, C.; Gain, A.K.; Mayer-Gürr, T.; Flechtner, F.; Güntner, A. Daily GRACE gravity field solutions track major flood events in the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 2867–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sivapalan, M. Prediction in ungauged basins: A grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrol. Process. 2003, 17, 3163–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B. Dynamic hydrologic modeling using the zero-parameter Budyko model with instantaneous dryness index. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016, 43, 9696–9703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurtenbach, E.; Eicker, A.; Mayer-Gürr, T.; Holschneider, M.; Hayn, M.; Fuhrmann, M.; Kusche, J. Improved daily GRACE gravity field solutions using a Kalman smoother. J. Geodyn. 2012, 59, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, B.F.; Vogel, R.M.; Kroll, C.N.; Famiglietti, J. Estimation of the base flow recession constant under human interference. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 7366–7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reddyvaraprasad, C.; Patnaik, S.; Biswal, B. Recession flow prediction in gauged and ungauged basins by just considering past discharge information. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2019, 65, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhang, K.; Long, Y.; Feng, L. Estimation of Active Stream Network Length in a Hilly Headwater Catchment Using Recession Flow Analysis. Water 2017, 9, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, H.; Choi, H.T.; Lim, H. Applicability Assessment of Estimation Methods for Baseflow Recession Constants in Small Forest Catchments. Water 2018, 10, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodell, M.; Houser, P.R.; Jambor, U.; Gottschalck, J.; Mitchell, K.; Meng, C.-J.; Arsenault, K.; Cosgrove, B.; Radakovich, J.; Bosilovich, M.; et al. The Global Land Data Assimilation System. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2004, 85, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bo, C.; Krajewski, W. Analysing individual recession events: Sensitivity of parameter determination to the calculation procedure. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 2887–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, H.; Chen, Y. Influences of recent climate change and human activities on water storage variations in Central Asia. J. Hydrol. 2017, 544, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, P.; Chen, Y. An analysis of terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE and GLDAS: The Tianshan Mountains and its adjacent areas, central Asia. Quat. Int. 2015, 358, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, H. Variations in water storage in China over recent decades from GRACE observations and GLDAS. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 16, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bart, R.; Hope, A. Inter-seasonal variability in baseflow recession rates: The role of aquifer antecedent storage in central California watersheds. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patnaik, S.; Biswal, B.; Kumar, D.N.; Sivakumar, B. Effect of catchment characteristics on the relationship between past discharge and the power law recession coefficient. J. Hydrol. 2015, 528, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer-Gürr, T.; Behzadpour, S.; Ellmer, M.; Klinger, B.; Kvas, A.; Zehentner, N. ITSG-Grace2016—Monthly and Daily Gravity Field Solutions from GRACE; Graz University of Technology: Graz, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kvas, A. Estimation of Short- and Long-term Temporal Variations in Earth’s Gravity Field from GRACE Data in a Combined Least Squares Adjustment. Available online: https://pure.tugraz.at/ws/portalfiles/portal/16893989/2014_Kvas_GRACE.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020).
- Klinger, B.; Mayer-Gürr, T. The role of accelerometer data calibration within GRACE gravity field recovery: Results from ITSG-Grace2016. Adv. Space Res. 2016, 58, 1597–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodell, M.; Famiglietti, J.S. An analysis of terrestrial water storage variations in Illinois with implications for the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scanlon, B.R.; Zhang, Z.; Save, H.; Wiese, D.N.; Landerer, F.; Long, D.; Longuevergne, L.; Chen, J. Global evaluation of new GRACE mascon products for hydrologic applications. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 9412–9429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Callaghan, J.; Mark, D.M. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 1984, 28, 323–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koster, R.D.; Suarez, M.J.; Ducharne, A.; Stieglitz, M.; Kumar, P. A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2000, 105, 24809–24822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houborg, R.; Rodell, M.; Lawrimore, J.; Li, B.; Reichle, R.H.; Heim, R.; Rosencrans, M.; Tinker, R.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Svoboda, M.D.; et al. Using enhanced GRACE water storage data to improve drought detection by the U.S. and North American Drought Monitors. IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 2010, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B.; Marani, M. Geomorphological origin of recession curves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, B.; Kumar, D.N. A general geomorphological recession flow model for river basins. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 4900–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dralle, D.N.; Karst, N.; Thompson, S. a, b careful: The challenge of scale invariance for comparative analyses in power law models of the streamflow recession. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 9285–9293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weerasinghe, I.; Bastiaanssen, W.; Mul, M.; Jia, L.; Van Griensven, A. Can we trust remote sensing evapotranspiration products over Africa? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 24, 1565–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Landerer, F.W.; Swenson, S.C. Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.B.; Riha, S.J. Examining individual recession events instead of a data cloud: Using a modified interpretation of dQ/dt–Q streamflow recession in glaciated watersheds to better inform models of low flow. J. Hydrol. 2012, 434, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutzner, R.; Bertuzzo, E.; Tarolli, P.; Weijs, S.V.; Nicotina, L.; Ceola, S.; Tomasic, N.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.; Parlange, M.; Rinaldo, A. Geomorphic signatures on Brutsaert base flow recession analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 5462–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dralle, D.N.; Karst, N.; Charalampous, K.; Veenstra, A.; Thompson, S. Event-scale power law recession analysis: Quantifying methodological uncertainty. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGrath, G.; Kaeseberg, T.; Reyes-Silva, J.D.; Jawitz, J.W.; Blumensaat, F.; Borchardt, D.; Mellander, P.; Paik, K.; Krebs, P.; Rao, P.S.C. Network Topology and Rainfall Controls on the Variability of Combined Sewer Overflows and Loads. Water Resour. Res. 2019, 55, 9578–9591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brutsaert, W.; Nieber, J.L. Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau. Water Resour. Res. 1977, 13, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hailegeorgis, T.T.; Alfredsen, K.T.; Abdella, Y.S.; Kolberg, S. Evaluation of different parameterizations of the spatial heterogeneity of subsurface storage capacity for hourly runoff simulation in boreal mountainous watershed. J. Hydrol. 2015, 522, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brauer, C.C.; Teuling, A.J.; Torfs, P.J.J.F.; Uijlenhoet, R. Investigating storage-discharge relations in a lowland catchment using hydrograph fitting, recession analysis, and soil moisture data. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 4257–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashie, A.; Pavelsky, T.; Band, L.E. An Empirical Reevaluation of Streamflow Recession Analysis at the Continental Scale. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, 2019–025448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahr, J.; Swenson, S.; Velicogna, I. Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, A.Y.; Scanlon, B.R.; AghaKouchak, A.; Zhang, Z. Using GRACE Satellite Gravimetry for Assessing Large-Scale Hydrologic Extremes. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Longuevergne, L.; Scanlon, B.R.; Wilson, C.R. GRACE Hydrological estimates for small basins: Evaluating processing approaches on the High Plains Aquifer, USA. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houborg, R.; Rodell, M.; Li, B.; Reichle, R.; Zaitchik, B.F. Drought indicators based on model-assimilated Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage observations. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tangdamrongsub, N.; Han, S.-C.; Tian, S.; Schmied, H.M.; Sutanudjaja, E.H.; Ran, J.; Feng, W. Evaluation of Groundwater Storage Variations Estimated from GRACE Data Assimilation and State-of-the-Art Land Surface Models in Australia and the North China Plain. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reager, J.T.; Thomas, A.C.; Sproles, E.A.; Rodell, M.; Beaudoing, H.K.; Li, B.; Famiglietti, J. Assimilation of GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage Observations into a Land Surface Model for the Assessment of Regional Flood Potential. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 14663–14679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sharma, D.; Patnaik, S.; Biswal, B.; Reager, J.T. Characterization of Basin-Scale Dynamic Storage–Discharge Relationship Using Daily GRACE Based Storage Anomaly Data. Geosciences 2020, 10, 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100404
Sharma D, Patnaik S, Biswal B, Reager JT. Characterization of Basin-Scale Dynamic Storage–Discharge Relationship Using Daily GRACE Based Storage Anomaly Data. Geosciences. 2020; 10(10):404. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100404
Chicago/Turabian StyleSharma, Durga, Swagat Patnaik, Basudev Biswal, and John T. Reager. 2020. "Characterization of Basin-Scale Dynamic Storage–Discharge Relationship Using Daily GRACE Based Storage Anomaly Data" Geosciences 10, no. 10: 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100404