Simple Summary
Determining whether adding butyric acid and lauric acid glycerides to pigs’ diets would replace the growth promoters was our goal. The additives fulfilled their purpose, resulting in great growth performance and lower therapeutic interventions. The additives increased the immunoglobulins and decreased the acute phase proteins, which reflects a lower inflammatory response.
Abstract
(1) Background: This study determined whether adding butyric acid and lauric acid glycerides in nursing pigs’ feed would improve growth performance, proteinogram, biochemical parameters, and antioxidant status. (2) Methods: Ninety male pigs were divided into five groups with six repetitions per group: NC, negative control (no additive); TRI-BUT, addition of tributyrin in the basal ration; MDT-BUT, addition of mono-, di-, and triglycerides of butyric acid in the basal feed; MDT-LAU, the addition of mono-, di-, and triglycerides of lauric acid in the basal feed; and PC, positive control (addition of gentamicin in the basal feed). (3) Results: PC, TRI-BUT, and MDT-LAU resulted in a high average daily WG from days 1 to 39 (p < 0.01). MDT-LAU, MDT-BUT, and PC resulted in a greater feed:gain from days 1 to 39 than the NC (p = 0.03). Great concentrations of the gamma globulin fraction in all groups were observed than in the NC (p = 0.01). Ceruloplasmin, haptoglobin, and C-reactive protein concentrations were lower in all groups than in the NC (p < 0.05). Higher serum glutathione S-transferase activity was observed in the TRI-BUT and MDT-BUT than in the PC (p = 0.04). (4) Conclusions: The addition of butyric acid and lauric acid glycerides in the diet of pigs in the nursery phase can replace growth promoters since the products improve the growth performance, reduce acute-phase proteins, and increase gamma globulin concentrations.
1. Introduction
Due to several challenges, the nursery phase is one of the most critical phases in a pig’s life. Many of these challenges (i.e., physiological and immunological immaturity) correspond to weaning, with life conditions imposed on the pigs (diet change, separation from the mother, and forming new social groups).
Heritable factors do not primarily influence the survival and performance of pigs in the nursery phase; instead, they are related to environmental factors such as nutrition, health, management, and facilities [1]. The imposed challenges can cause intestinal dysbiosis, which leads to lower performance due to diarrhea and facilitates infections with opportunistic pathogens [2].
Limitations on using antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed are a consequence of public health policies. The European Union banned the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in 2006 [3]. Brazil, the fourth largest exporter of pork worldwide, enacted a partial ban on some drugs in 2018–2020 [4,5]. For these reasons, alternatives are sought to replace growth promoters (antibiotics), including organic acids, phytogenics, probiotics, and prebiotics.
Among commercially available additives, we highlight butyric acid, composed of four carbons, and its derivatives, including mono-, di-, and triglycerides. This acid is linked to a glycerol molecule via an ester bond. Furthermore, this acid is an energy source for enterocytes and improves intestinal morphology [6]. Tributyrin comprises three butyrate molecules and is released by intestinal lipase [7]. The mono-, di-, and tri-forms of butyric acid refer to one, two, and three molecules of butyrate attached to glycerol, leading to an enhancement of gut development, control of enteric pathogens, reduction of inflammation, improvement of growth performance (including carcass composition), and modulation of gut microbiota [8]. Tributyrin improved the growth performance of weaned pigs in the same way that it increases protein utilization and synthesis [9].
The mono-, di-, and triglyceride forms of lauric acid are monoesters comprising 12 carbon atoms and characterized by the union between a glycerol molecule and lauric acid. Lauric acid can be found in nature, e.g., in coconut oil and human breast milk in the glycerol monolaurate [10]. It has fungicidal, bactericidal, viricidal [11], and antioxidant activity [12], in addition to improving immunity [13]. Glycerol monolaurate improved the digestion and absorption of nutrients and reduced the colonization of pathogenic bacteria in weaned pigs [14]. There is a lack of literature on how additives can influence serum biomarkers that are related to the immune system and biochemistry systems. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether adding butyric acid and lauric acid glycerides to nursing pigs’ feed would improve growth performance, proteinogram, serum biochemistry, and antioxidant status.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Additives
The additives tested were based on glycerides: (1) mono-, di-, and triglycerides of butyric acid, (2) tributyrin, (3) mono-, di-, and triglycerides of lauric acid, and the antibiotic gentamicin.
2.2. Animals and Experimental Design
We used 90 non-castrated male weaned pigs (Landrace x Large White), 28 days old, with an average weight of 7.5 (±1.1 kg). The pigs were randomly assigned to one of five treatments with six replicates each and three pigs per pen (90 cm × 1.20 m). The treatment groups were as follows: NC, negative control (no additive, only basal feed); TRI-BUT, addition of tributyrin in the basal feed (dose of 2 kg/ton in the pre 1, pre 2 feed; and 1 kg/ton in the starter feed); MDT-BUT, addition of mono-, di-, and triglycerides of butyric acid (dose of 2 kg/ton in the pre 1, pre 2 feed; and 1 kg/ton in the starter feed); MDT-LAU, the addition of mono-, di-, and triglycerides of lauric acid (2 kg/ton in the pre 1, pre 2 feed; and 1 kg/ton in the starter feed); PC, positive control, addition of 0.113 kg/ton of gentamicin in the pre 1, pre 2, and starter feed.
The basal feed used to prepare the experimental diets was formulated based on crushed corn and soybean meal (Table 1), according to the nutritional requirements for pigs described in the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine [15]. The pigs received water and feed ad libitum.
Table 1.
Ingredients and calculated chemical composition of diets.
2.3. Performance
Pigs were weighed on days 1, 7, 14, and 39 of the experiment using a scale. Weight gain (WG) was determined by the formula = final weight minus the initial weight of the group. Feed intake was calculated as the difference between the feed provided and the leftovers weighed at the end of the period. Feed:gain was calculated by the total amount of feed ingested divided by the live weight of the pigs.
2.4. Sample Collection
Veterinary drug interventions were performed whenever the pigs showed diarrhea and signs of apathy, neurological signs, encephalitis, or signs of gastrointestinal or respiratory disease. We treated diarrhea using a protocol based on lincomycin (Linco Spectin®—1 mL/10 kg, three doses at 24-h intervals). We treated encephalitis with ampicillin and colistin (Agroplus®—1 mL/10 kg, three doses at 24-h intervals). The number of medicated pigs and doses per pig were counted and presented descriptively.
On day 39, we chose one pig per pen randomly for drawn blood—a total of six pigs per treatment; into vacutainer tubes without anticoagulant via the cranial vena cava. This material was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min, and the serum was separated, collected, and frozen (–20 °C) for biochemical analysis, proteinogram, and antioxidant status.
2.5. Serum Biochemistries
Serum concentrations of albumin, total protein, cholesterol, triglycerides, and urea were analyzed using commercial analytical kits (Analisa®) and a semi-automatic biochemical analyzer (Bioplus 2000®). The serum globulin level was calculated using globulin = total protein—albumin.
2.6. Proteinogram
Protein fractionation was performed using cellulose acetate strip electrophoresis in a horizontal cube (Denscan® Electrophoresis System, Labex S/A Indústria e Comércio, Aparecida de Goiânia, Brazil) with Tris-glycine buffer (pH 8.6) as described by Costa et al. [16]. Samples were applied to the strips and run using a constant voltage of 150 V for 25 min. Strips were stained with Ponceau Red for 15 min. The excess stain was removed by washing the strips with 5% acetic acid until the background was clear. Then, strips were fixed in methanol for 30 s and washed for 1 min with a destain solution. Strips were dried at 60 °C for 15 min and read using the Denscan system.
2.7. Antioxidant Status
Protein thiols (PSH) were determined by the method described by Sedlak and Lindsay [17]. PSH was measured in the pellet formed by protein precipitated from the resuspended material using a homogenization buffer. Absorbance readings (405 nm) were performed using a spectrofluorometer (Biotek, Synergy HT). Serum glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity was determined according to Habig et al. [18] from the formation rate of dinitrophenyl-S-glutathione at 340 nm in a medium containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.5, 1 mM GSH, 1 mM 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as substrate and tissue supernatants (approximately 0.045 mg of protein). Lipid peroxidation was determined as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels in serum according to the method described by Jentzsch et al. [19]; results were obtained using spectrophotometry at 535 nm.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using the SAS ‘MIXED procedure’ (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA; version 9.4), with the Satterthwaite approximation to determine denominator degrees of freedom for the fixed effects test. All variables were subjected to the normality test (Shapiro–Wilk). Body weight (BW), weight gain, concentrate intake, and blood date were tested for fixed treatment effect using pen (repetition) as the random effect, as well as treatment × day interaction to BW. Day 1 results were included as an independent covariate. Means were separated using the PDIFF method (t-test), and all results were expressed as LSMEANS followed by the standard error of the mean. Significance was defined when p ≤ 0.05; a trend was when p > 0.05 or ≤0.10.
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
The growth performance results are presented in Table 2. Greater body weight was observed on day 39 of the experiment in the PC, TRI-BUT, and MDT-LAU groups than in the NC (p < 0.01). PC, TRI-BUT, and MDT-LAU resulted in a greater average daily weight gain from days 1 to 39 than in the NC (p < 0.01). There was a trend toward greater feed intake by pigs in the PC group than the others between days 15 and 39 (p = 0.10). There was lower feed:gain from days 1 to 14 in the TRI-BUT and MDT-BUT groups, followed by the PC, than the NC (p = 0.05). In the total period (days 1–39), there was a lower feed:gain in the pigs in the MDT-LAU group, followed by the MDT-BUT and PC, than the NC (p = 0.03). There was no difference for the other periods (p > 0.05).
Table 2.
Body weight (kg), average daily gain (kg), feed intake (kg/day), and feed:gain (kg/kg) of pigs fed formulations derived from butyric acid and lauric acid.
3.2. Serum Biochemistries, Proteinogram, and Antioxidant Status
The results of serum biochemistry, electrophoresis protein profile, and antioxidant status are displayed in Table 3. A greater glucose concentration was observed in the PC and TRI-BUT groups than in the others (p = 0.05). Lower levels of triglycerides were observed in the MDT-BUT and MDT-LAU groups, followed by the TRI-BUT, than in the NC (p = 0.02). There were greater concentrations of urea and ML in the PC than in the NC (p = 0.01). There was no difference in cholesterol, total protein, and albumin (p > 0.05). There was a trend toward lower globulin levels in the TRI-BUT and MDT-BUT groups than in the PC group (p = 0.08).
Table 3.
Serum biochemistry and antioxidant status of pigs fed formulations derived from butyric acid and monolaurin.
There were greater observed concentrations of gamma globulins in all groups than in the NC (p = 0.01). The concentrations of ceruloplasmin, haptoglobin, and C-reactive protein were lower in all groups than in the NC (p = 0.02; p = 0.01; p = 0.04). Greater GST activity was observed in the TRI-BUT and MDT-BUT groups than in the PC (p = 0.04). However, there was no difference between groups for TBARS and PSH (p > 0.05).
3.3. Drug Interventions
One pig in the PC group died on the eighth day of the experiment, with clinical neurological signs compatible with rapidly evolving encephalitis, which did not allow antibiotics. The number of pigs medicated with lincomycin due to diarrhea was seven in the PC group, 13 in the NC group, five in the TRI-BUT group, nine in the MDT-BUT group, and eight in the MDL-LAU group. The number of pigs medicated with ampicillin and colistin due to suspected encephalitis was four in the PC group, six in the NC group, three in the TRI-BUT group, five in the MDT-BUT group, and four in the MDT-LAU group. It is essential to highlight that some pigs were medicated with these drugs at different times, and some pigs needed to be medicated more than once due to diarrhea. Therefore, when interpreting the data on the number of doses of lincomycin given during the entire experimental period, it is worth remembering that our protocol provided for three doses in a 24-h interval. The number of pigs medicated according to the groups was as follows: PC, NC, TRI-BUT, MDT-BUT, and MDT-LAU received 30, 60, 18, 27, and 24 doses, respectively.
4. Discussion
The group composed of mono-, di-, and triglycerides of lauric acid also showed a higher WG than the NC, similar to the PC. This finding could be because of the ability of the lauric acid molecule to increase villus height and villus:crypt ratio and decrease crypt depth [20]. This finding partially explains the WG, i.e., being due to a greater surface area for the absorption of nutrients and lower energy expenditure with the renewal of intestinal cells. In addition, this molecule has antimicrobial action due to being linked to a glycerol molecule; thus, it can more easily cross the liposoluble membrane of bacteria and release hydrogen ions. The bacterium dies from energy depletion in an attempt to send hydrogen out of the cell.
Tributyrin improved post-weaned pigs’ enzymatic activity of lactase, maltase, lipase, and trypsin [21]. Taherpour et al. [22] observed that broiler chickens’ mono-, di-, and triglyceride forms of butyric acid decreased pathogenic bacteria. Wang et al. [23] reported that adding tributyrin to the diet of weaned piglets increased daily WG, villus size, and villus:crypt ratio and reduced crypt depth, which improved the fecal score. Tugnoli et al. [24] found that tributyrin addition improved the growth performance of pigs, as the additive stimulated the proliferation of intestinal villi. These results might explain the superior performance of pigs from the MDT-BUT and TRI-BUT groups concerning the NC, similar to when using the growth promoter gentamicin.
Lauric acid is transported directly to the liver and metabolized as an energy source in the mitochondria [13], so it can modify lipid metabolism. Adding mono-, di-, and triglycerides of lauric acid decreased serum triglyceride concentrations in our pigs. Saeidi et al. [25] reported a decrease in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and an increase in HDL cholesterol when supplementing quail with medium-chain fatty acids; nevertheless, the mechanisms of how these molecules alter lipid metabolism are uncertain. Urea is a waste product produced in the liver from the breakdown of proteins by the body, and higher levels in the blood are related to kidney or liver problems [9]. We found a great daily WG in pigs in the MDT-LAU group associated with higher serum levels of urea; however, the values of this variable were within the normal range for the species and nursery phase.
Pigs in groups fed with butyric acid or lauric acid glycerides had lower serum triglyceride concentrations than the negative control. The cause of the occurrence is related to the lower lipoprotein lipase concentration in the jejunum, liver, and adipocytes, which means there was a reduction in lipolysis [26]. Glucose is used by cells as a source of energy; therefore, it reflects the animals’ physiological state [27]. There was an increase in glucose concentration in the group that received tributyrin. This increase may be related to hyperglycemia [28], observed in the current study discreetly, but higher than the other treatments.
The body has enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense systems to combat excess free radicals. GST is a metabolic enzyme crucial to the organism’s detoxification [29]. In addition, it participates in the synthesis of steroids; in cases of oxidative stress, its levels are often reduced [30]. Butyric acid glycerides caused an increase in GST activity in the present study, which may have occurred to combat a possible excess of reactive oxygen species. Lan et al. [31] found that the supplementation of 1200 mg/kg of butyric acid in broiler chickens increased the activity of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase and decreased malondialdehyde levels.
Gamma globulin concentration encompasses all immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgE). Our findings suggest that the antimicrobial and the glycerides efficiently reduce the immune or inflammatory response by increasing the gamma globulin levels that act against foreign organisms entering the body. Haptoglobin and C-reactive protein are acute-phase proteins [32] and have their concentrations altered when innate immunity is activated [33]. Ceruloplasmin is an acute-phase protein that carries copper from the liver to other tissue cells [34]. Acute-phase proteins are produced and secreted by hepatocytes and extrahepatic tissues such as epithelial cells, endoepithelial cells, and connective tissue [35]. Therefore, the increase in these proteins indicates inflammation and activation of the immune response, which leads to energy expenditure. Our findings suggest that the additives could mitigate these effects.
5. Conclusions
The use of butyric acid and lauric acid glycerides in the diet of pigs in the nursery phase has the potential to replace growth promoters, as the additives fulfilled their purpose in improving growth performance and reducing therapeutic interventions; they also modulated protein, energy, and lipid metabolism. Glyceride forms of butyric acid stimulated GST, an enzyme essential for liver protection. Finally, the additives increased the concentration of immunoglobulins and decreased the concentration of acute-phase proteins, which reflect a reduced inflammatory response.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and formal analysis investigation (C.A.F.; D.P. and A.S.d.S.), methodology, validation, and data curation writing—original draft preparation (C.A.F.; G.M.G.; E.Z.; I.Z.; M.A.F.D.d.A.; M.G.d.V.; D.P. and A.S.d.S.); and resources, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition (G.M.G.; D.P. and A.S.d.S.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The ethics committee on the use of animals in research of the Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina approved all procedures for this project under protocol number 6267190421 and all procedures followed the rules issued by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) in the meeting of 04/23/2021.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due an agreement between the authors.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank CAPES, CNPq (Brazil), and FAPESC (Santa Catarina, Brazil) for the technical support and public funding of research in the country.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Quesnel, H.; Farmer, C.; Devillers, N. Colostrum intake: Influence on piglet performance and factors of variation. Livest. Sci. 2012, 146, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Su, J.Q.; An, X.L.; Huang, F.Y.; Rensing, C.; Brandt, K.K.; Zhu, Y.G. Feed additives shift gut microbiota and enrich antibiotic resistance in swine gut. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 1224–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission 2005. Ban on Antibiotics as Growth Promoters in Animal Feed Enters into Effect. Available online: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-05-1687_en.htm (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- Diário Oficial da União Edição: 243|Seção: 1|Página: 23, Portaria Número 171. 2018. Available online: http://www.in.gov.br/materia//asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/55878469/do1-2018-12-19-portaria-n-171-de-13-de-dezembro-de-2018-55878239 (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- Diário Oficial da União Edição: 16|Seção: 1|Página: 6 Instrução Normativa Nº 1, De 13 De Janeiro De 2020. Available online: http://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/instrucao-normativa-n-1-de-13-de-janeiro-de-2020-239402385 (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- Antongiovanni, M.; Buccioni, A.; Petacchi, F.; Leeson, S.; Minieri, S.; Martini, A.; Cecchi, R. Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: Effects on gut histology and carcass composition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 6, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Hou, Y.; Yi, D.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L. Effects of tributyrin on intestinal energy status, antioxidative capacity and immune response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 1784–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bedford, A.; Gong, J. Implications of butyrate and its derivatives for gut health and animal production. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sotira, S.; Dell’Anno, M.; Caprarulo, V.; Hejna, M.; Pirrone, F.; Callegari, M.L.; Tucci, T.V.; Rossi, L. Effects of Tributyrin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Insulin, Blood Metabolites and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2020, 10, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gussem, M.; Dedeurwaerder, A.; Christiaens, I.; Damen, E.P.C.W.; Dansen, O. Alpha-monolaurin stimulates the antibody response elicited upon infectious bronchitis vaccination of broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2021, 30, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Jiang, H.; Alhamoud, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, J.; Liu, T.; Feng, F. Integrated metabolomic and gene expression analyses to study the effects of glycerol monolaurate on flesh quality in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, S.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Tegomo, A.F.; Sagada, G.; Zheng, L.; Wang, L.; Shao, O. Effect of dietary supplementation of lauric acid on growth performance, antioxidative capacity, intestinal development and gut microbiota on black sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii). PLoS ONE 2022, 13, e0262427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Yu, R.Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.B. Integrating Serum Metabolome and Gut Microbiome to Evaluate the Benefits of Lauric Acid on Lipopolysaccharide-Challenged Broilers. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 759323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Huakai, W.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, T.; Ma, Y. Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate on intestinal morphology, nutrient digestibility, serum profiles, and gut microbiota in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rostagno, H.S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Hannas, M.I.; Donzele, J.L.; Sakomura, N.K.; Perazzo, F.G.; Saraiva, U.M.A.; Teixeira, M.L.; Rodrigues, P.B.; Oliveira, R.F.; et al. Tabelas Brasileiras Para Aves E Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais, 4th ed.; UFV DZO MG: Viçosa, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Costa, M.M.; da Silva, A.S.; Wolkmer, P.; Zanette, R.A.; França, R.T.; Monteiro, S.G.; Lopes, S.T.; Dos, A. Serum proteinogram of cats experimentally infected by Trypanosoma evansi. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 95, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sedlak, J.; Lindsay, R.H. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1968, 25, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jentzsch, A.M.; Bachmann, H.; Fürst, P.; Biesalski, H.K. Improved analysis of malondialdehyde in human body fluids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1996, 20, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tugnoli, B.; Giovagnoni, G.; Piva, A.; Grilli, E. From Acidifiers to Intestinal Health Enhancers: How Organic Acids Can Improve Growth Efficiency of Pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Zhong, X.; He, J.; Zhang, L.; Bai, K.; Xu, W.; Wang, T.; Huang, X. Supplementation of tributyrin improves the growth and intestinal digestive and barrier functions in intrauterine growth-restricted piglets. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taherpour, K.; Moravej, H.; Taheri, H.R.; Shivazad, M. Effect of dietary inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on resistance against coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 49, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Shen, Z.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Hong, Q.; Feng, J.; Hu, C. Effects of tributyrin on growth performance, intestinal microflora and barrier function of weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 258, 114311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Tang, J.; Feng, F. Glycerol monolaurate improves performance, intestinal development, and muscle amino acids in yellow-feathered broilers via manipulating gut microbiota. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 10279–10291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeidi, E.; Shokrollahi, B.; Karimi, K.; Amiri-Andi, M. Effects of medium-chain fatty acids on performance, carcass characteristics, blood biochemical parameters and immune response in Japanese quail. Br. Poul. Sci. 2016, 57, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Yin, F.; Yang, Y.; Lepp, D.; Yu, H.; Ruan, Z.; Yang, C.; Yin, Y.; Hou, Y.; Leeson, S.; et al. Dietary butyrate glycerides modulate intestinal microbiota composition and serum metabolites in broilers. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmat, M.; Cheng, J.; Abbas, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Fan, Z.; Ahmad, B.; Hou, M.; Osman, G.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LFB112 on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune, and Serum Biochemical Response in Broiler Chickens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.; Chen, X.W.; Huang, X.; Song, B.L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in health and disease. China Life Sci. 2019, 62, 1420–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raafat, N.; Ismail, K.; Hawsawi, N.M.; Saber, T.; Elsawy, W.H.; Abdulmutaleb, T.; Raafat, A.; Gharib, A.F. Glutathione S transferase T1 gene polymorphism and its promoter methylation are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Egyptian women. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021, 69, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szeligowska, N.; Cholewińska, P.; Smoliński, J.; Wojnarowski, K.; Pokorny, P.; Czyż, K.; Pogoda Sewerniak, K. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) and cortisol levels vs. microbiology of the digestive system of sheep during lambing. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lan, R.; Zhao, Z.; Li, S.; An, L. Sodium butyrate as an effective feed additive to improve performance, liver function, and meat quality in broilers under hot climatic condition. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 5491–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čobanović, N.; Stanković, S.D.; Dimitrijević, M.; Suvajdžić, B.; Grković, N.; Vasilev, D.; Karabasil, N. Identifying Physiological Stress Biomarkers for Prediction of Pork Quality Variation. Animals 2020, 10, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huntley, N.F.; Gould, S.A.; Patience, J. Evaluation of the effect of β-mannanase supplementation and mannans on nursery pig growth performance and serum acute phase protein concentrations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 100, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musharraf, M.; Khan, M.A. Estimation of dietary copper requirement of fingerling Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquaculture 2022, 549, 737742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Gautam, V.; Naseem, S. Acute-phase proteins: As diagnostic tool. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2011, 3, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).