Next Article in Journal
Sex Reversal Induced by Dietary Supplementation with 17α-Methyltestosterone during the Critical Period of Sex Differentiation in Oriental River Prawn (Macrobrachium nipponense)
Next Article in Special Issue
Conservation of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) in Southeastern Turkey: A Preliminary Study for Morphological Characterization and Determination of Colony Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Valorization of Food Waste as Animal Feed: A Step towards Sustainable Food Waste Management and Circular Bioeconomy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tropilaelaps mercedesae Infestation Is Correlated with Injury Numbers on the Brood and the Population Size of Honey Bee Apis mellifera
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/ani13081368
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Workers of Apis mellifera Reared in Small-Cell Combs Show Higher Activity of the Proteolytic System in Hemolymph than Workers Reared in Standard-Cell Combs in Laboratory Cage Tests

by
Piotr Dziechciarz
1,
Aneta Strachecka
2,
Grzegorz Borsuk
1 and
Krzysztof Olszewski
1,*
1
Subdepartment of Apidology, Institute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Invertebrate Ecophysiology and Experimental Biology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(8), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081368
Submission received: 22 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 16 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bee Biology, Pathology and Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Honeybees live in two different environments that are affected by multiple factors, e.g., pathogens or weather conditions. Thanks to the construction of the nests and behavioral cooperation honeybees became independent from the influence of external conditions. Moreover, a single bee has barriers that maintain homeostasis in its body and protect it from harmful factors, such as pesticides, air pollutants, or pathogens, through a system of proteases and their inhibitors. In feral bee colonies, bee comb cells vary in their width, while in Europe, colonies are kept only on standard-cell combs (5.50 mm cell width) or small-cell combs (4.90 mm cell width). In apiary conditions, the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the 1-day-old workers were always higher in workers reared in standard-cell combs than in workers reared in small-cell combs, and opposite results were observed in groups of older workers (aged 7, 14, and 21 d). However, evaluating the influence of the nest factor is complex and difficult in field tests. Therefore, we assessed the proteolytic system activity in the hemolymph of colonies kept simultaneously on standard and small-cell combs in laboratory cage tests. The use of two types of combs in bee colony nests is an innovative approach to the use of small-cell combs in beekeeping. Irrespective of the age of the bees, the workers reared in the small-cell combs had higher protein concentrations. In turn, the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of 1-day-old workers were higher in the group reared in the standard-cell combs. In older workers (aged 7, 14, and 21 days), higher protease and inhibitor activities were detected in the group reared in small-cell combs. The comparison of the results of apiary studies with those of laboratory cage tests shows that functions performed in the nest have a greater influence than age on the activity of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of worker bees.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of honeybee workers reared in small-cell combs (SMC) and standard-cell combs (STC) in laboratory cage tests. The analyses conducted in laboratory conditions facilitated assessment of the impact of the comb cell width (small vs. standard) along with eliminating the influence of many environmental factors on the results. The width of the comb cells in which the workers were reared had a significant effect on the protein concentrations and proteolytic system activities in the hemolymph. Irrespective of the age of the workers, higher protein concentrations were found in the hemolymph of the SMC workers. In turn, the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of 1-day-old bees were higher in the STC workers. In older bees, aged 7–21 days, activity was higher in the SMC workers. The role of the considerable cell width variability in natural combs that were built without the use of an artificially produced wax foundation is worth investigating. It is highly probable that the impact of the comb cell width on the features of workers reared in these combs modifies the age polyethism in the worker caste as well. The investigation results of one-season studies of honeybees could be seriously affected by random factors. To reduce the risk of these effects, it is advisable to continue experiments over a few consecutive years.

1. Introduction

Honeybees live in two environments which are characterized by substantially different parameters. One environment is the nest, where the conditions are regulated precisely by worker bees. Consequently, the colony/superorganism is independent of changing environmental conditions outside the nest [1]. The other living environment is the ecosystem outside the nest, which the bees cannot modify [2]. All resources required for the functioning of the colony are collected by workers, specifically foragers, from the environment surrounding the bee colony.
One of the adaptations of honeybees to living in two different environments is age polyethism in the worker caste, i.e., the performance of age-related functions in the colony [3]. A special stage in the specialization of workers is the transition from the function of nurse/nest workers to foragers [4]. Such a radical change in both the work environment and the type of work may result in considerable changes in the functioning of the nervous and immune systems [5,6,7]. Changes in the functioning of the immune system of workers are a result of the greater exposure of foragers to various environmental stressors present outside the nest.. Contaminants and pathogens encountered by worker bees in the environment surrounding the bee colony are transferred to their bodies and enter the nest with food and water, thus impacting the other bees and the brood in the colony [8,9,10,11]. Therefore, despite the precise regulation of the nest conditions, external environmental factors have a direct and indirect effect on colony functioning [12,13]. The quality and availability of resources as well as the amount and type of pathogens and contaminants transported to the nest determine the biological quality of the bees [14,15], their lifespan, and their work performance. Such a complicated network of dependencies impedes assessment of, e.g., the genetic determinants of bee traits and the impact of factors present in the external and internal nest environment on bees [16,17]. Hence, such assessment in apiary/colony conditions is difficult to conduct and elucidate. [16,18,19]. To reduce the randomness of environmental factors and determine the impact of a specific factor/substance, laboratory cage tests are used in research on honeybees [20,21,22,23,24].
The wax comb built by bee workers, which consists of numerous cells, is the largest structural element of the colony nest. However, the structure of bee colony nests that are currently kept by humans differs significantly from original nests built by wild-living colonies. At present, combs in developed countries are built on thin beeswax sheets bearing imprinted cell outlines, i.e., wax foundations produced artificially as a template for honeybees to build comb cells.
It is believed that the main effect of introducing the wax foundation was the increase in the width/size of worker comb cells [25]. Currently, the standard width of worker cells in Europe varies within a small range, usually between 5.40 and 5.50 mm [25,26]. In contrast, the width of worker comb cells in natural nests of European dark bees Apis mellifera mellifera was found to range from 4.90 to 5.10 mm [27]. Comb cells with a width of 4.90 mm are referred to as “small cells” [25]. However, the standardization of the cell width/size itself in wax foundations was as important as enlarging the comb cell’s width as it substantially limited the variability in the comb cell width within the colony. Maggi et al. [28] measured the width of cells in colony nests with natural combs built without the use of the wax foundation and reported a considerable variability in this parameter. Worker brood and drone brood were reared in cells with widths of 4.17–6.75 mm and 5.04–8.05 mm, respectively.
Given the large variability of the comb cell width in a bee colony indicated by Maggi et al. [28] and the thesis proposed by Tautz [1], who described the honeycomb as the most important organ of the colony superorganism based on the diversity of its functions, we were the first to conduct pioneer studies focused on elucidation of the role of such a large variability in the comb cell width in the same bee colony. We introduced two types of combs in colony nests and kept the colonies on both small and standard cells at the same time. This meant that the variability of the comb cell width in the nests was similar to that found in nests built without the use of wax foundations [28]. Our previous studies showed that female workers reared in the so-called small cells (width: approx. 4.90 mm) differed from those reared in standard cells (width: approx. 5.50 mm) in their morphological [29] and physiological [30] traits. The width of comb cells may also modify the intensity of hygienic behavior in colonies, i.e., removal of dead brood, which affects the behavior of workers [31,32]. In apiary conditions, comparing the activity of the proteolytic system in the hemolymph of workers reared in small- and standard-cell combs allowed us to hypothesize that workers reared in small cells are predisposed to serve as foragers, and those reared in standard cells tend to work within the nest e.g. as serving the function of nurses [30]. In our previous work, we found that, in apiary conditions, the activity of the proteolytic system in the hemolymph of older workers (aged 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d), as expressed by the activities of proteases and their inhibitors, were always significantly higher in workers reared in small cells than in those reared in standard cells [30]. Opposite results were shown for the protein concentrations, where activities were always significantly lower in workers reared in small cells than in those reared in standard cells at the age of 7–21 days.
The aim of this study was to assess changes in the activity of the proteolytic system in the hemolymph of worker bees that were reared in cells with different width values (small vs. standard) in laboratory cage tests. The investigations conducted under laboratory conditions allowed the effect of the comb cell width to be independently assessed by eliminating the influence of numerous environmental factors on the results, which is not possible in apiary studies [30]. The assessment of proteolytic system parameters in laboratory cage tests can shed new light on the biological bases of beekeeping management technology involving the usage of small cell combs.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Lublin, Poland). The workers used in the laboratory cage tests were reared in the University apiary (51.224039 N–22.634649 E). A long-term study was conducted over three consecutive years (2020, 2021, and 2022) to omit random effects of environmental factors.

2.1. Acquisition of Bees

The group of foster colonies (n = 5) kept in Dadant Blatt hives were analyzed each year. The colonies had similar strength and structure, with nests containing eight brood combs, one drone comb, and one storage comb, all of which were fully populated by workers and naturally inseminated sister queens of the same age [30]. The nest of each foster colony contained two types of combs: standard-cell (cell width: approx. 5.50 mm) and small-cell (cell width: approx. 4.90 mm) combs [30]. The small- and standard-cell combs arrangement of the brood chamber was consistent with that reported by [32]. The workers in each foster colony were reared on a small-cell comb (SMC) and a standard-cell comb (STC) [30].

2.2. Laboratory Cage Tests

Workers were collected from all of the foster colonies and from each type of comb (small/standard cells) and were transferred to three cages. Two groups of cages were created in this way; one group was composed of SMC workers (reared in small-cell combs) and the other group comprised STC workers (reared in standard-cell combs). Each group consisted of 15 cages (5 colonies with 1 SMC comb and 1 STC comb in each × 3 cages of each type of comb = 15 cages with SMC workers and 15 cages with STC workers). The cages were kept in controlled conditions of 25 °C with ad libitum access to sugar syrup, which was composed of water and sucrose in a 1:1 ratio. Each day, the syrup was replaced with a fresh supply and dead bees were removed.

2.3. Hemolymph Collection and Analysis

Hemolymph was collected on days 7, 14, and 21 from the SMC and STC workers. No hemolymph was sampled from 21-day-old workers in 2020 as the bees in all cages had died before that time. The hemolymph was collected at the site of antenna detachment [33]. As in Borsuk et al. [33], tweezers were used to detatch antennas, and an automatic pipette with sterile tips was used to collect the hemolymph. One hemolymph sample was collected from five randomly selected worker bees from each cage and each group (SMC/STC). Hemolymph was collected from 1-day-old workers from each foster colony and each type of comb (small cells/standard cells) in the same way.
Each hemolymph sample was transferred into a separate Eppendorf tube (0.5 mL) that was filled with 150 µL of 0.6% NaCl, and then placed in a cooling block to prevent melanization [24,30,34]. Immediately after hemolymph collection, the tubes were frozen and stored at −80 °C. The number of hemolymph samples collected in each year is shown in Table 1. To eliminate the impact of potential Nosema spp./Variomorpha infection of the workers on the results, each group of sample worker bees was checked for the presence of Nosema spp. spores [35].
Total protein concentrations were assayed with the Lowry et al. [36] method as modified by Schacterle and Pollack [37]. The activities of acidic (pH 2.4), neutral (pH 7.0), and alkaline (pH 11.2) proteases in the hemolymph of the bees were analyzed with the Anson [38] method as modified by Strachecka et al. [39]. The activities of acidic (pH 2.4), neutral (pH 7.0), and alkaline (pH 11.2) protease inhibitors in the hemolymph were determined using the Lee and Lin method [40].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of the results was carried out using Statistica software formulas, version 13.3 (2017) for Windows, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA.
The effect of the year (2020, 2021, and 2022) and age (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) in each study year on the protein concentration and activity of the analyzed types of proteases and their inhibitors were assessed separately for the SMC and STC workers. ANOVA was used for normally distributed data and the Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for non-normally distributed data. The distribution of these data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test.
The protein concentrations and the activities of each type of protease (acidic, neutral, and alkaline) and its inhibitors in 1-day-old bees were compared between the SMC and STC workers using the t-Student test for data with normal distribution, and the pairwise Wilcoxon test was used for data with non-normal distribution. The distribution of these data was analyzed with the Shapiro–Wilk test.
The protein concentrations and the activities of each type of protease and its inhibitors within the age groups (7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) were compared between the SMC and SMC groups using the t-Student test for independent samples and the Mann–Whitney U test for data with non-normal distribution. The distribution of these data was analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test.
The effect of the year (2020, 2021, 2022) on the width of comb cells in the foster colonies was analyzed separately for small-cell combs (n = 300) and standard-cell combs (n = 300) using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The distribution of these data was analyzed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test. The width of the small-cell combs in the foster colonies (n = 300) was compared with the width of the standard-cell combs (n = 300), collectively, for the three years using the Mann–Whitney U test, as the effect of the year was not significant for either the small- or standard-cell combs. The distribution of these data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test.

3. Results

3.1. Comb Cell Width

The were no significant differences in width of cells in the small-cell and standard-cell combs of the foster colonies between the years (respectively: H = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.87, n = 300; H = 2.39, df = 2, p = 0.30, n = 300; Kruskal–Wallis test).
The width of the small-cells was significantly smaller (p ≤ 0.01; n = 300; Mann–Whitney U test) than that of the standard-cells. The mean values of the width of small-cells in the combs of the foster colonies was 4.97 mm (SD = 0.04), whereas the width of standard-cells in the combs of the foster colonies was 5.56 mm (SD = 0.05).

3.2. Protein Concentrations, Protease, and Protease Inhibitor Activities

No spores of Nosema spp./Variomorpha were found in any of the worker bees in the laboratory tests. Therefore, it was assumed that the Nosema spp./Variomorpha infestation did not influence the results of the experiments.
In both the SMC and STC worker groups, the year exerted a significant effect on the protein concentrations and the activities of all types of protease inhibitors (acidic, neutral, and alkaline) (Table 2). The effect of the year on the activities of all types of proteases (acidic, neutral, and alkaline) in the SMC workers were not significant. In turn, a significant effect on the activities of alkaline proteases exclusively were found in the group of the STC workers (Table 2). In all study years, the age (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) had a significant effect on all hemolymph parameters in the SMC and STC workers (Table 2).
With the exception of the 14-day-old workers in 2020, the protein concentrations were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.01) in the SMC vs. STC workers in all age groups (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, 21 d) in all years (2020, 2021, and 2022) (Figure 1, Table 3).
In all years, the activities of all types of proteases and protease inhibitors were statistically significantly higher in the 1-day-old STC vs. SMC workers (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table 3). In contrast, the older workers (7 d, 14 d, 21 d) exhibited an opposite trend, i.e., the activities were higher (mostly with statistical significance) in the SMC workers. The activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the SMC and STC workers were similar only in a few cases (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table 3).

4. Discussion

As in our previous apiary experiments, the comb cell width exerted a significant effect on the protein concentrations and the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of worker bees [30].
The same trend in the protein concentrations was recorded on the workers’ first day of life, and the value of this parameter was higher in the SMC workers in the apiary [30] and laboratory conditions (Figure 1, Table 3). In turn, the protein concentrations in the older workers (7 d, 14 d, 21 d) analyzed in the laboratory cage tests were significantly higher in the SMC vs. STC group. An opposite trend was recorded in the apiary conditions [30], where the protein concentrations in the SMC group were significantly lower than in the STC workers. Given these statistically significant differences in the protein concentrations between the SMC and STC workers, the structure of the fat body should be compared, with consideration of the segmental character that was recently discovered [41].
The comparison of the results of apiary and laboratory tests conducted in our present and previous studies indicates a significant effect on the traits of worker bees when they are reared in small-celled combs. In the apiary conditions, the SMC workers had a lower protein concentrations in the hemolymph but higher activities of proteases and their inhibitors than the STC workers [30]. The SMC workers exhibited higher catalase and superoxide dismutase activities as well as total antioxidant capacity in the hemolymph than the STC workers in both laboratory and apiary conditions [42]. Moreover, the SMC workers lived longer than the STC bees in the laboratory conditions [21].
The impact of rearing workers in small-cell combs or the use of such combs in the apiary is not limited only to the values of worker traits; it also modifies the traits of the bee colony. Colonies kept on small-cell combs exhibit more intensive hygienic behavior in terms of dead brood removal than those kept on standard-cell combs [31]. Dead brood is removed more effectively from small- than standard-cell combs [32]. Additionally, colonies with both small- and standard-cell combs in the nest (simultaneous use of two types of combs) have a higher performance value, as they develop faster in spring and produce significantly greater amounts of honey than colonies kept on only one type of comb, i.e., either with only small cells or only standard cells [43].
Table 4 compares the trends in the changes to the hemolymph parameters that occur with age in the SMC and STC workers as were assessed in the present laboratory cage tests and the previous study conducted in apiary conditions [30]. The protein concentrations increased with age in both the SMC and STC workers in the laboratory cage tests. In the apiary conditions, the value of this parameter decreased in the SMC workers and increased in the STC group.
The age-related decrease in the protein concentrations in the hemolymph of the SMC workers in the apiary conditions was associated with their transition from nurse/nest workers to foragers [30]. We assumed that SMC workers started working as foragers earlier and more frequently, while STC workers more often work in the nest, e.g., as nurse workers, as the protein concentrations in the hemolymph of STC workers increased with age [30]. The basis for this inference is the finding of lower protein concentrations in the hemolymph of foragers vs. nurse workers [44,45,46,47]. The bodies of nurse bees also contain greater amounts of protein [48]. The studies cited previously indicate that the protein concentration in the hemolymph is one of the physiological markers that distinguishes foragers from nurses.
The hypothesis that SMC workers serve as foragers was also confirmed by the results of the laboratory cage tests, where the protein concentrations in their hemolymph increased with age, as in the case of the STC workers. This was probably related to the fact that workers kept in cages could not undertake any specialized work and did not utilize the protein stored in their hemolymph and fat body. In turn, in apiary conditions, the highest protein concentrations were detected in larvae and pupae, lower levels were found in nurse workers, and the lowest amounts were found in foragers [44,45]. The differences in the age-dependent changes in the protein concentration in laboratory vs. apiary conditions are probably associated with the absence of the modifying impact of nest environment factors and external environment in laboratory cage tests.
In the SMC workers examined in the laboratory and apiary conditions, the activities of proteases in the hemolymph increased with age (Table 4). The values of these parameters in the STC group increased in the laboratory cage tests but persisted at a similar levels in the apiary conditions.
The higher activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of the SMC workers in the laboratory cage tests may indicate that they are more predisposed to work as foragers than the STC workers. The higher activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of the SMC workers may result from their enhanced exposure to numerous immunosuppressive factors encountered outside the nest. The activity of the proteolytic system, which is one of the measures of humoral immunity in the hemolymph, is influenced by the following factors: pesticides [49,50,51], biostimulants [52,53], and caste status [54].
The predisposition of SMC workers to serve as foragers has been confirmed in morphological studies. As reported by Vance et al. [55], foragers have lower body weight than nurses. This was confirmed in a study conducted by [29], where the body weight of SMC workers was 7.1% lower than that of STC workers, while the wings of the former bees were only 3.4% shorter and 2.8% narrower. In turn, the larger body size may predispose STC workers to serve as nurses, as such bees are regarded to be better nurses than smaller ones [56]. Additionally, STC workers have a significantly larger head (width and height) than SMC workers [29], which may be associated with the size and efficiency of their hypopharyngeal glands. In these glands, nurses produce royal jelly, which is food for larvae. Further investigations of STC and SMC workers hypopharyngeal glands must be conducted. Our ongoing research focuses on measuring STC and SMC workers’ hypopharyngeal glands and comparing the number of marked foragers and the location of marked workers in the nest (open brood, capped brood, and storage combs) to clarify the predispositions of workers reared in different type of combs to different tasks in the colony.
Based on the information presented in this discussion, it can be assumed that the width of the comb cells has an impact on the division of labor in the worker caste. Given this assumption, it can be hypothesized that, along with age polyethism, the significant variability in the width of comb cells in nests built without a wax foundation [28] introduces components of morphological polyethism into the bee colony. Morphological polyethism is typical of some ant species [57]. The combination of age polyethism in a bee colony with elements of morphological polyethism may indicate a compromise between strict specialization and behavioral flexibility. However, further investigations are required to corroborate this hypothesis.
The results of the protein concentrations and activities of protease inhibitors in 2020 differed significantly from those obtained in the other two years. Since the cages in the laboratory tests were kept in the same conditions, i.e., in a room with a constant temperature, throughout the three study years, we assume that this may have been caused by an unidentified factor that occurred during the rearing of worker bees in foster colonies. Thus, one-season studies of honeybees are burdened with the risk of random factors affecting the results. Therefore, to reduce this risk, it is advisable to continue such investigations over a few consecutive years.

5. Conclusions

The width of comb cells where worker bees were reared had a significant effect on the protein concentrations and the activity of the proteolytic system in the hemolymph of workers kept in the laboratory conditions. Irrespective of the age of the bees, the workers reared in the small-cell combs had higher protein concentrations. In turn, the activities of proteases and their inhibitors in the hemolymph of 1-day old workers were higher in the group reared in the standard-cell combs. In older workers (aged 7, 14, and 21 days), higher activities were detected in the group reared in small-cell combs.
One-season investigations of honeybees pose a risk of a significant effect exerted by random factors on the results. Therefore, continuation of research over a few consecutive years is recommended to reduce this risk.
The comparison of the results of apiary studies with the results of laboratory cage tests shows that functions performed in the nest have a greater influence than the age on the activity of proteases and their inhibitors in hemolymph of worker bees. This was especially noticeable in the case of workers reared in the standard-cell combs.
It is worth explaining the mechanisms and factors causing the construction of cells of different sizes in the nest of the same bee colony, and the consequences of such cell size variability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, research, discussion, statistical analysis and writing, P.D. and K.O.; Laboratory analysis, P.D.; Research, writing, A.S. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, OPUS Grant number 2018/31/B/NZ9/02480.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because honeybees (Apis mellifera) are not included in the European directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tautz, J. Phänomen Honigbiene, 2nd ed.; Spectrum-Elsevier: Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; p. 156. [Google Scholar]
  2. Winston, M.L. The Biology of the Honey Bee; Havard University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson, B.R. Division of labor in honeybees: Form, function, and proximate mechanisms. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2010, 64, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Robinson, G.E. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37, 637–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Withers, G.S.; Fahrbach, S.E.; Robinson, G.E. Selective neuroanatomical plasticity and division of labour in the honeybee. Nature 1993, 364, 238–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Williams, J.B.; Roberts, S.P.; Elekonich, M.M. Age and natural metabolically-intensive behavior affect oxidative stress and antioxidant mechanisms. Exp. Gerontol. 2008, 43, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Margotta, J.W.; Roberts, S.P.; Elekonich, M.M. Effects of flight activity and age on oxidative damage in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 26, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fries, I.; Camazine, S. Implications of horizontal and vertical pathogen transmission for honey bee epidemiology. Apidologie 2001, 32, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Negri, I.; Mavris, C.; Di Prisco, G.; Caprio, E.; Pellecchia, M. Honey bees (Apis mellifera, L.) as active samplers of airborne particulate matter. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e132491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Steinhauer, N.; Kulhanek, K.; Antúnez, K.; Human, H.; Chantawannakul, P.; Chauzat, M.P.; van Engelsdorp, D. Drivers of Colony Losses. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018, 26, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Borsuk, G.; Sulborska, A.; Stawiarz, E.; Olszewski, K.; Wiącek, D.; Ramzi, N.; Nawrocka, A.; Jędryczka, M. Capacity of honeybees to remove heavy metals from nectar and excrete the contaminants from their bodies. Apidologie 2021, 52, 1098–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Genersch, E.; von der Ohe, W.; Kaatz, H.; Schroeder, A.; Otten, C.; Buchler, R.; Berg, S.; Ritter, W.; Muhlen, W.; Fisder, S.; et al. The German bee monitoring project: A long term study to understand periodically high winter losses of honey bee colonies. Apidologie 2010, 41, 332–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Le Conte, Y.; Navajas, M. Climate change: Impact on honey bee populations and diseases. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE J. 2008, 27, 499–510. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vaudo, A.D.; Tooker, J.F.; Grozinger, C.M.; Patch, H.M. Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2015, 10, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Castelli, L.; Branchiccela, B.; Garrido, M.; Invernizzi, C.; Porrini, M.; Romero, H.; Santos, E.; Zunino, P.; Antúnez, K. Impact of nutritional stress on honeybee gut microbiota, immunity, and Nosema ceranae infection. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 80, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Williams, G.R.; Alaux, C.; Costa, C.; Csáki, T.; Doublet, V.; Eisenhardt, D.; Fries, I.; Kuhn, R.; McMahon, D.P.; Medrzycki, P.; et al. Standard methods for maintaining adult apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. J. Apicult. Res. 2013, 52, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olszewski, K.; Paleolog, J. Foraging and hoarding efficiency in Buckfast purebreds and Norwegian Black Bee (A. m. mellifera) hybrids Part 1. Annual honey yield versus results of field flying cage and laboratory tests. J. Apic. Sci. 2005, 49, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  18. Higes, M.; Nozal, M.J.; Alvaro, A.; Barrios, L.; Meana, A.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Bernal, J.L.; Bernal, J. The stability and effectiveness of fumagillin in controlling Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) infection in honey bees (Apis mellifera) under laboratory and field conditions. Apidologie 2011, 42, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Henry, M.; Cerrutti, N.; Aupinel, P.; Decourtye, A.; Gayrard, M.; Odoux, J.F.; Pissard, A.; Rüger, C.; Bretagnolle, V. Reconciling laboratory and field assessments of neonicotinoid toxicity to honeybees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20152110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Milne, C.P. An improved laboratory measurement of hoarding behavior in the honeybee. Am. Bee J. 1997, 117, 502–507. [Google Scholar]
  21. Olszewski, K.; Borsuk, G.; Paleolog, J.; Strachecka, A.J. Life span of worker honeybees reared in colonies kept on small-cell combs. Med. Weter 2014, 70, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dziechciarz, P.; Borsuk, G.; Olszewski, K. Prospects and validity of laboratory cage tests conducted in honeybee research part one:Main directions of use of laboratory cage tests in honeybee research. J. Apic. Sci. 2019, 63, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dziechciarz, P.; Olszewski, K. Prospects and validity of laboratory cage tests conducted in honeybee research part two: New possibilities for use of laboratory cage tests in response to challenges revealed at the turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries. J. Apic. Sci. 2020, 64, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Skowronek, P.; Wójcik, Ł.; Strachecka, A. Impressive Impact of Hemp Extract on Antioxidant System in Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Organism. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McMullan, J.B.; Brown, M.J.F. The influence of small-cell brood combs on the morphometry of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 2006, 37, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Coffey, M.F.; Breen, J.; Brown, M.J.F.; McMullan, J.B. Brood-cell size has no influence on the population dynamics of Varroa destructor mites in the native western honey bee, Apis mellifera mellifera. Apidologie 2010, 41, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cowan, T.W. The Honeybee: Its Natural History, Anatomy and Physiology; Houlston and Sons: London, UK, 1904. [Google Scholar]
  28. Maggi, M.; Damiani, N.; Ruffinengo, S.; De Jong, D.; Principal, J.; Eguaras, M. Brood cell size of Apis mellifera modifies the reproductive behavior of Varroa destructor. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 50, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dziechciarz, P.; Borsuk, G.; Olszewski, K. Possibility to change the body size in worker bees by a combination of small-cell andstandard-cell combs in the same nest. Apidologie 2021, 52, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dziechciarz, P.; Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K. Effect of Comb Cell Width on the Activity of the Proteolytic System in the Hemolymph of Apis mellifera Workers. Animals 2022, 12, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Olszewski, K.; Borsuk, G.; Paleolog, J.; Strachecka, A.; Bajda, M. Hygienic behaviour of colonies kept on small-cell combs. Med. Weter. 2014, 70, 774–776. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dziechciarz, P.; Borsuk, G.; Olszewski, K. Dead brood of Apis mellifera is removed more effectively from small-cell combs than from standard-cell combs. Animals 2022, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Borsuk, G.; Ptaszyńska, A.A.; Olszewski, K.; Domaciuk, M.; Krutmuang, P.; Paleolog, J. A new method for quick and easy hemolymph collection from apidae adults. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Skowronek, P.; Strachecka, A. Cannabidiol (CBD) Supports the Honeybee Worker Organism by Activating the Antioxidant System. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fries, I.; Chauzat, M.P.; Chen, Y.P.; Doublet, V.; Genersch, E.; Gisder, S.; Higes, M.; McMahon, D.P.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Natsopoulou, M.; et al. Standard methods for Nosema research. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebriugh, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schacterle, G.; Pollack, R. Simplified method for quantitative assay of small amounts of protein in biological material. Anal. Biochem. 1973, 51, 654–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Anson, M. The estimation of pepsin, tripsin, papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J. Gen. Physiol. 1938, 22, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Strachecka, A.; Demetraki-Paleolog, J. System proteolityczny powierzchni ciała Apis mellifera w zachowaniu zdrowotności rodzin pszczelich. Kosmos 2011, 60, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, T.; Lin, Y. Trypsin inhibitor and trypsin–like protease activity in air–or submergence–grown rice (Oryza sativa L.) coleoptiles. Plant Sci. 1995, 106, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K.; Kuszewska, K.; Chobotow, J.; Wójcik, Ł.; Paleolog, J.; Woyciechowski, M. Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dziechciarz, P.; Strachecka, A.; Borsuk, G.; Olszewski, K. Effect of rearing in small-cell combs on activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase and total antioxidant capacity in the hemolymph of Apis mellifera workers. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dziechciarz, P.; Borsuk, G.; Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K. Simultaneous maintaining of bee colonies on combs with small and standard cells results in behavioral overdominance. In Proceedings of the EurBee 9: 9th European Congress of Apidology, Belgrade, Serbia, 20–22 September 2022. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilson-Rich, N.; Dres, S.T.; Starks, P.T. The ontogeny of immunity: Development of innate immune strength in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Eckholm, B.J.; Huang, M.H.; Anderson, K.E.; Mott, B.M.; DeGrandi-Hoffman, G. Honey bee (Apis mellifera) intracolonial genetic diversity influences worker nutritional status. Apidologie 2015, 46, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Crailsheim, K. Dependence of protein metabolism on age and season in the honeybee (Apis mellifica carnica Pollm). J. Insect Physiol. 1986, 32, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fluri, P.; Lüscher, M.; Wille, H.; Gerig, L. Changes in weight of the pharyngeal gland and haemolymph titres of juvenile hormone, protein and vitellogenin in worker honey bees. J. Insect Physiol. 1982, 28, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crailsheim, K.; Schneider, L.H.W.; Hrassnigg, N.; Bühlmann, G.; Brosch, U.; Gmeinbauer, R.; Schöffmann, B. Pollen consumption and utilization in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica): Dependence on individual age and function. J. Insect Physiol. 1992, 38, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Blacquière, T.; Smagghe, G.; Van Gestel, C.A.M.; Mommaerts, V. Neonicotinoids in bees: A review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 973–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cullen, M.G.; Thompson, L.J.; Carolan, J.C.; Stout, J.C.; Stanley, D.A. Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Paleolog, J.; Wilde, J.; Miszczak, A.; Gancarz, M.; Strachecka, A. Antioxidation Defenses of Apis mellifera Queens and Workers Respond to Imidacloprid in Different Age-Dependent Ways: Old Queens Are Resistant, Foragers Are Not. Animals 2021, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K.; Paleolog, J.; Borsuk, G.; Bajda, M.; Krauze, M.; Merska, M.; Chobotow, J. Coenzyme Q10 treatments influence the lifespan and key biochemical resistance systems in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 86, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Strachecka, A.J.; Olszewski, K.; Paleolog, J. Curcumin Stimulates Biochemical Mechanisms of Apis Mellifera Resistance and Extends the Apian. Life-Span. J. Apic. Sci. 2015, 59, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K.; Kuszewska, K.; Paleolog, J.; Woyciechowski, M. Reproductive Potential Accelerates Preimaginal Development of Rebel Workers in Apis mellifera. Animals 2021, 11, 3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vance, J.T.; Williams, J.B.; Elekonich, M.M.; Roberts, S.P. The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 2604–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Willem, J.; Boot, J.N.M.; Allsopp, C.; Allsopp, M. Differential feeding of larvae affects caste differentiation in Apis mellifera. Proc. Neth. Entomol. Soc. Meet. 2006, 17, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mertl, A.L.; Traniello, J.F. Behavioral evolution in the major worker subcaste of twig-nesting Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Does morphological specialization influence task plasticity? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009, 63, 1411–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 01368 g001 550
Figure 1. Protein concentrations in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 1. Protein concentrations in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g001
Animals 13 01368 g002 550
Figure 2. Acidic protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 2. Acidic protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g002
Animals 13 01368 g003 550
Figure 3. Neutral protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 3. Neutral protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g003
Animals 13 01368 g004 550
Figure 4. Alkaline protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 4. Alkaline protease activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g004
Animals 13 01368 g005 550
Figure 5. Acidic protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 5. Acidic protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g005
Animals 13 01368 g006 550
Figure 6. Neutral protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 6. Neutral protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g006
Animals 13 01368 g007 550
Figure 7. Alkaline protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 7. Alkaline protease inhibitor activities in the hemolymph of workers in three consecutive years. SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs; *—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.05); **—differences between SMC and STM within the age group are significant (p ≤ 0.01); vertical bars indicate standard deviation.
Animals 13 01368 g007
Table
Table 1. Number of hemolymph samples in each age group of workers (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) in the three consecutive years.
Table 1. Number of hemolymph samples in each age group of workers (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) in the three consecutive years.
AgeGroupYear
202020212022
1 daySMC151515
STC151515
7 daysSMC151515
STC151515
14 daysSMC151515
STC151515
21 daysSMC-1515
STC-1515
SMC—workers reared in small-cell combs; STC—workers reared in standard-cell combs.
Table
Table 2. Effect of the year (2020, 2021, and 2022) and age (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) on hemolymph parameters in workers reared in small- and standard-cell combs in laboratory cage tests.
Table 2. Effect of the year (2020, 2021, and 2022) and age (1 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d) on hemolymph parameters in workers reared in small- and standard-cell combs in laboratory cage tests.
Hemolymph
Parameters		Impact of the YearImpact of the Age
202020212022
SMCSTCSMCSTCSMCSTCSMCSTC
protein
concentration		H = 84.74H = 89.99F = 33.14F = 31.64H = 48.45F = 48.66H = 49.32H = 48.87
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.58p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of acidic proteasesH = 5.38H = 4.82H = 32.98H = 34.26H = 55.33H = 55.32H = 55.32H = 50.95
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.07p = 0.09p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of neutral proteasesH = 5.62H = 0.90H = 32.96H = 33.19H = 55.31H = 55.23H = 54.57H = 55.33
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.06p = 0.63p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of alkaline proteasesH = 4.82H = 11.18H = 37.15H = 30.02H = 55.32H = 55.35H = 54.55H = 54.21
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.09p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of acidic protease inhibitorsF = 28.14H = 66.69F = 51.14F = 144.61F = 507.88H = 50.04H = 55.33F = 235.74
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of neutral protease inhibitorsH = 90.98F = 100.25F = 54.11F = 167.76F = 679.91H = 51.91H = 55.23H = 51.14
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
activities of alkaline protease inhibitorsH = 36.69H = 71.08H = 32.87F = 139.04F = 970.37F = 219.27F = 289.44F = 142.65
df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 2df = 3df = 3df = 3df = 3
p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00p = 0.00
SMC—workers reared on small-cell combs; STC—workers reared on standard-cell combs, H—value of statistics for the Kruskal–Wallis test; F—value of Fisher’s test for ANOVA; df—number of degrees of freedom; p—probability value. Impact of the year and impact of the age in SMC and STM groups are significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Changes in the protein concentrations and activities of proteases and their inhibitors in workers reared in small-cell combs (SMC) in comparison with workers reared in standard-cell combs (STC) at the age of 1, 7, 14, and 21 days.
Table 3. Changes in the protein concentrations and activities of proteases and their inhibitors in workers reared in small-cell combs (SMC) in comparison with workers reared in standard-cell combs (STC) at the age of 1, 7, 14, and 21 days.
Hemolymph
Parameters		202020212022
1 d7 d14 d21 d1 d7 d14 d21 d1 d7 d14 d21 d
protein concentrationAnimals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001-Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of acidic proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		=
n.s.		-Animals 13 01368 i002=
n.s		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of neutral proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001=
n.s.		-Animals 13 01368 i002=
n.s		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of alkaline proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		 - Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of acidic protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001 - Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of neutral protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001 - Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002=
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of alkaline protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001-Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001=
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i003
n.s.		Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
Animals 13 01368 i001—green arrow indicates that the value of the trait is significantly higher in SMC workers than STC workers; Animals 13 01368 i002—red arrow indicates that the value of the trait is significantly lower in SMC workers than STC workers; n.s.—statistically insignificant difference between SMC workers and STC workers; Animals 13 01368 i003—black arrow indicates that the value of the trait is higher in SMC workers than STC workers but without statistical significance; =—equal sign indicates that the value of the trait in SMC workers is close or equal to the trait value in STC workers.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of trends in the age-related changes to hemolymph parameters in workers reared in small-cell combs (SMC) and standard-cell combs (STC) as observed in the present laboratory tests and the apiary tests carried out by Dziechciarz et al. [30].
Table 4. Comparison of trends in the age-related changes to hemolymph parameters in workers reared in small-cell combs (SMC) and standard-cell combs (STC) as observed in the present laboratory tests and the apiary tests carried out by Dziechciarz et al. [30].
Hemolymph ParametersSMCSTC
LaboratoryApiaryLaboratoryApiary
protein concentrationAnimals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i002Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001
activities of acidic proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001=
activities of neutral proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001=
activities of alkaline proteasesAnimals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001Animals 13 01368 i001=
activities of acidic protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i001n.t.Animals 13 01368 i001n.t.
activities of neutral protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i001n.t.Animals 13 01368 i001n.t.
activities of alkaline protease inhibitorsAnimals 13 01368 i001n.t.Animals 13 01368 i001n.t.
Animals 13 01368 i001—green arrow indicates an upward trend in the value of the trait with age; Animals 13 01368 i002—red arrow indicates a downward trend in the value of the trait with age; =—equal sign indicates a value of the trait persisting at a similar level with age; n.t.—changes in the value of the trait do not showing similar trends with age.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dziechciarz, P.; Strachecka, A.; Borsuk, G.; Olszewski, K. Workers of Apis mellifera Reared in Small-Cell Combs Show Higher Activity of the Proteolytic System in Hemolymph than Workers Reared in Standard-Cell Combs in Laboratory Cage Tests. Animals 2023, 13, 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081368

AMA Style

Dziechciarz P, Strachecka A, Borsuk G, Olszewski K. Workers of Apis mellifera Reared in Small-Cell Combs Show Higher Activity of the Proteolytic System in Hemolymph than Workers Reared in Standard-Cell Combs in Laboratory Cage Tests. Animals. 2023; 13(8):1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dziechciarz, Piotr, Aneta Strachecka, Grzegorz Borsuk, and Krzysztof Olszewski. 2023. "Workers of Apis mellifera Reared in Small-Cell Combs Show Higher Activity of the Proteolytic System in Hemolymph than Workers Reared in Standard-Cell Combs in Laboratory Cage Tests" Animals 13, no. 8: 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop