Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Fed Cattle Mobility during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement of Selected Renal Biochemical Parameters in Healthy Adult Donkeys Considering the Influence of Gender, Age and Blood Freezing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/ani11061747
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Stress Assessed through Infrared Thermography and Environmental Parameters on the Performance of Fattening Rabbits

by
Juan Antonio Jaén-Téllez
,
María José Sánchez-Guerrero
*,
Mercedes Valera
and
Pedro González-Redondo
Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad de Sevilla, Ctra. Utrera km 1, 41013 Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(6), 1747; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061747
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 8 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal System and Management)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of stress due to heat (temperature-humidity index; THI) or handling (human restraining), assessed using infrared thermography, on the performance parameters of rabbits of a Spanish Common breed. Thirty-nine rabbits weaned at the age of 28 days were analyzed during a 38-d fattening period at two times of the year: a cold period and a warm period. The rabbits’ stress due to handling was assessed by the temperature difference taken by infrared thermography in the inner ear of the animals, before and after being handled. In general, the productive results were low, since it was an unimproved rustic breed. The animals were more productive in the cold season as the values obtained for daily feed intake (DFI), average daily gain (ADG), total body weight (TBW), total feed intake (TFI) and total weight gain (TWG) were higher then, while the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was higher in the warm season. The greater the stress due to handling, the less efficient the animals were. It was therefore concluded that changes in animal welfare caused by the rabbits’ reactivity to both climatic and individual factors affect animal productivity.

Abstract

Rabbits often experience stress when they perceive certain stimuli, such as handling. The physiological response of animals to stress and temperament is associated with feeding efficiency, with those with the least capacity to react to stress showing the highest performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of stress due to heat (temperature-humidity index; THI) or handling, assessed using infrared thermography, on the performance parameters of rabbits of a Spanish Common breed. Thirty-nine rabbits were analyzed during a 38-d fattening period at two times of the year: a cold period and a warm period. The rabbits’ stress due to handling was assessed by the temperature difference taken in the inner ear, before and after being handled. The animals were more productive in the cold season. Temperature-humidity index significantly influenced average daily gain (ADG) and daily feed intake (DFI). Rabbits with higher levels of stress showed higher ADG, DFI and feed conversion ratio (FCR) values. The greater the stress due to handling, the less efficient the animals were. FCR increased with higher THI. It was concluded that changes in animal welfare caused by the rabbits’ reactivity to both climatic and individual factors affect animal productivity.

1. Introduction

Docility and not being afraid of people are among the preferential characteristics selected when domesticating animals [1]. Rabbits, however, were domesticated much later than other species [2] and the effects of domestication on them are not so marked: in fact, they conserve many characteristics of their wild ancestors, such as digging burrows and making nests [3,4]. Another of these is that domestication has failed to eradicate their fear of humans, who are perceived as a potential predator [5]. Nevertheless, proper treatment by breeders can decrease the animals’ fear and contribute to their welfare [6]. Animals often experience stress when they perceive certain stimuli, such as handling by breeders, and it is possible to differentiate between acute and chronic stress [7]. Correct handling has extremely positive effects in this species, especially if it starts soon after birth [8], since the critical period for socialization occurs when the kits first open their eyes in the nest, at around 10 days of age [9].
In addition, the environmental conditions, especially temperature and relative humidity, affect both the physiological state and the productivity of animals [10]. Rabbits are particularly sensitive to heat, as they have few sweat glands and find it hard to reduce their body heat [11,12]. The rabbit has a thermoneutral zone between 18 and 21 °C, in which it makes no effort to raise or reduce its temperature [13,14] and in which it neither suffers any stress from trying to maintain its body temperature nor requires any extra energy to regulate it to the detriment of production indexes [15]. However, heat stress in rabbits does have a negative influence on production [16], with high temperatures the main factor affecting rabbit production in regions with a warm climate [17]. In this case, a parallel pathway to that of stress management is used, whereby the hypothalamus receives information about the environment and coordinates its responses through nerves and hormones.
Physiological changes occur in order to cope with this stimulus [18]. In the short term, a stressful stimulus response is triggered by activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which releases catecholamines (norepinephrine and epinephrine) from the adrenal medulla [19]. According to Axelrod and Reisine [20], motor activity and heart and spleen contractions increase in this phase, releasing more red blood cells. Vasomotor adjustments and dilation of the pupil occur, blood clotting increases and lymphocytes are neutralized to repair tissue damage, while energy is increased through glycolysis and lipolysis [20].
Animals may have different behavioral responses to handling; this is what is called temperament [21]. Animals can be more easily stressed if they are more excitable [22]. Furthermore, the ability of each animal to cope with stressful and adverse situations is different [23,24,25]. Physiological changes caused by stress can have adverse effects on rabbits’ productive performance, affecting parameters such as feed consumption, increased body weight, feed conversion and the quality of the meat obtained [26]. The physiological response of animals to stress and temperament are associated with feeding efficiency, with those animals with the least capacity to react to stress being the most effective [27]. These adverse effects have a bearing on the viability of commercial production of rabbit meat, since the fattening period accounts for at least 40% of the animal’s lifetime on the farm [28] and a large part of farm production costs (around 40%) is spent on feeding during the fattening period [29,30].
Stress can be estimated through biomarkers and changes in body temperature, and these can be analyzed using different techniques, such as by analyzing the biochemical parameters in the blood [31] and in excreta [32], or by infrared thermography [33,34]. Changes in body surface temperature as a consequence of both acute and chronic stress can be detected by infrared thermography [35,36]. Electromagnetic energy is measured using an infrared camera, and detects the different wave frequencies emitted by each temperature value [35]. Its main strength is that it is a non-invasive and non-contact method which can measure the surface temperature of animals [37]. It has been used successfully in ruminants [35], pigs [38], dogs [39], horses [40] and rabbits [33,41].
As has been shown, handling and environmental conditions (temperature and humidity) can be two of the most common stressors in current rabbit production systems. No record has been found of any studies describing how heat stress (measured with a temperature-humidity index) and stress caused by handling (animals measured with infrared thermography) in the post-weaning phase can influence the performance parameters of rabbits. For this reason, the main aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of the levels of heat stress, assessed through the temperature-humidity index (THI) and handling stress, evaluated by using infrared thermography. Infrared thermography was measured in the inner ear of rabbits reared for meat production, on the performance parameters of the fattening period, during the cold and warm seasons.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Husbandry

Common Spanish agouti-coated domestic meat-oriented rabbits belonging to a strain kept at the Higher Technical School of Agricultural Engineering Teaching Farm of the University of Seville (Spain) were used. The genetic characterization [42] and productive performance [43] of this nucleus has been previously described. Overall, the rabbits were phenotypically similar to the recently recognized autochthonous breed “Antiguo Pardo Español” (Spanish Common Rabbit) [44].
During the experimental periods, the rabbits were individually housed in polyvalent wire-mesh cages measuring 90 × 40 × 30 cm3 (length, width and height, respectively), located in a conventional closed facility with natural ventilation (geographic coordinates: 37° 21′ 36.3″ N and 5° 56′ 23.9″ W; 11 m a.s.l.). The animals were subjected to a natural photoperiod. The trial was carried out in accordance with the Spanish legislation [45] and Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes [46]. The experimental protocol was approved (Ref. 25583347/2015) by the Escuela Internacional de Doctorado (International Doctorate School) of the University of Seville (Spain).
The rabbits were fed a pelleted commercial balanced diet (15.0% crude protein and 15.5% crude fiber) ad libitum as their only feed. Water was supplied ad libitum.

2.2. Collecting the Temperature Data

A total of 39 weaned rabbits, with an age of 28 days old, were used during a 38-d fattening period in two different seasons: spring (warm season; 14 April to 22 May 2015; mean minimum temperature = 12.5 °C, mean maximum temperature = 24.6 °C; 12 days of data collection; n = 17 rabbits (12 males and 5 females)) and winter (cold season; 9 January to 23 February 2016; mean minimum temperature= 7.1 °C, mean maximum temperature = 18.1 °C;11 days of data collection; n = 22 rabbits (8 males and 14 females)). The animals’ stress levels were assessed with inner ear temperature measurements, following previous research by Jaén-Téllez et al. [33] which showed that the inner ear is the most suitable region to assess stress in rabbits, and that this correlates closely with eye temperature. Temperature samples were collected twice a week (Monday and Thursday) and twice each day: first, at 11:00 h when the animal had been undisturbed (U) in its own cage since the previous sampling day, and second, about ten minutes after handling the rabbit (held in the keeper’s arms) for about sixty seconds (H), always by the same person. The rabbits were restrained by the thorax and the hindquarters following the recommendations given by Chapel et al. [47]. Six pictures temperature image were taken for each rabbit twice a week. Three pictures were taken with the rabbit undisturbed in its own cage before the rabbit had been handled (U) and three when handling the rabbit (H). For each category of temperature (U or H), the mean between the three measurements was calculated. The whole procedure for the entire experimental stock took about 2 h 30 min on each sampling day. The temperature images were taken with a FLIR i7 camera, following the indications by Bartolomé et al. [48], adapted for recording inner ear temperatures in rabbits by Jaén-Telléz et al. [33]. The FLIR i7 has a precision of ± 2 °C o ± 2% and an accuracy of 0.10 °C. In order to calibrate the camera results, the environmental temperature and relative humidity were recorded with a digital thermo-hygrometer (Extech® 44550, Waltham, MA, USA) every time an infrared temperature sample was taken, so that each infrared temperature had a corresponding humidity and room temperature reading.

2.3. Environmental and Infrared Temperatures

In order to evaluate the environmental conditions and their relationship with the infrared temperature, the following data were recorded:
Temperature, U (°C) = environmental temperature taken just at the moment when the infrared temperatures were taken in undisturbed rabbits inside the cage.
Relative humidity, U (%) = Relative humidity taken just at the moment when the infrared temperatures were taken in undisturbed rabbits
Inner ear DIF = Infrared inner ear temperature in the handled rabbit (H)—Infrared inner ear temperature in the undisturbed rabbit inside the cage (U).

2.4. Collecting the Productive Data and Calculating Fattening Performance

The 39 weaned rabbits were weighed on the sampling days after the temperature samples were collected. The weight gain by each rabbit and the weight of the feed was recorded twice each day on sample collection: once before being filled (weight of the feed remaining in the feeder) and second, when the feed was added, always after the pictures had been taken. With these measurements, the following productive traits were calculated:
Daily feed intake (DFI, g/d), calculated as:
  • DFI = Feed weight differential (g) between two data collection dates/Days elapsed between those two data collection dates.
Average Daily Gain (ADG, g/d), calculated as:
  • ADG = Live weight differential (g) between two data collection dates/Days elapsed between those two data collection dates.
The Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) was calculated over two consecutive data collection days as:
  • FCR = feed intake (g)/weight gain (g).
Total body weight (TBW), total weight gain (TWG) and total feed intake (TFI) during the entire fattening period were also calculated.

2.5. Temperature-Humidity Index

The temperature-humidity index (THI), an indicator of thermal comfort level for animals in a housing system, was calculated according to Marai et al. [49], and given as:
THI = t − ((0.31 − 0.31 × RH) × (t − 14.4))
where: t = temperature (°C) and RH = relative humidity percentage/100.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The descriptive statistics (number, mean, minimum, maximum and standard error (SE)) for each trait: TBW, TWG, TFI, ADG, DFI, FCR and THI are shown in Table 1.
A General Linear Model of repeated measures was performed, considering each weaning rabbit (n = 39) as the experimental unit (Table 2). Daily feed intake, ADG and FCR were analyzed using the MIXED procedure [50] for repeated measures [51], assuming a composite symmetric (CS) covariance structure for animal effects, and including the fixed effects of sex, season, stress level and the effect of THI as a covariate. Stress levels were defined depending on the Inner ear DIF of the weaned rabbit at that sampling moment, following previous research by Jaén-Téllez et al. [33] which showed that the inner ear is the most suitable region to assess stress in rabbits. According to the temperature distribution, we defined four stress levels, graded in five-degree intervals that ensured sufficient sample size per interval: Level 1 (not stressed; n = 17): Inner ear DIF ≤ 0 °C; Level 2 (slightly stressed; n = 208): 0 °C < Inner ear DIF ≤ 5 °C; Level 3 (stressed; n = 114): 5 °C < Inner ear DIF ≤ 10 °C and Level 4 (very stressed; n = 56): Inner ear DIF > 10 °C. Each environmental effect was analyzed one-by-one using one-factor analyses (Table 2). This was followed by a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test to study the categorical effects (Table 3).
Finally, in order to predict ADG, DFI and FCR based on stress levels and THI, a quadratic regression analysis was performed (Figure 1).
The quadratic equation with the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean squared error (RMSE) and the p value of the analysis were provided for each parameter. Effects were considered as significant when p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistica v.12.0 (Statistica software, v.12.0. Statsoft, Inc. 1984–2014, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and SAS [50] package.

3. Results

The fattening performance of the experimental stock is shown in Table 1. FCR showed a mean value of 3.18 ± 0.06 which ranged from 3.08 ± 0.09 for the cold season to 3.24 ± 0.07 for the warm season. In contrast, TWG, TBW, ADG and TFI showed higher values in the cold season than the warm season (increases of 36.8 g, 110 g, 2.6 g/d and 125 g, respectively) (Table 1). In the warm season, all the variables except THI had a lower coefficient of variation, and the rabbits gained less weight (TWG) and ate less feed (TFI). The changes in THI between summer and winter were high, with the minimum THI in the warm season (17.19) higher than the maximum value in the cold season (15.35).
The environmental effects that could most influence the fattening performance were studied (Table 2). Sex was not a significant effect in any trait. The stress levels produced statistically significant differences for all the productive traits collected (p < 0.05). The season (warm or cold) had a statistically significant effect on DFI and FCR (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001), and THI had a significant effect on ADG (p = 0.018) and DFI (p < 0.039).
The results of the Tukey post hoc are shown in Table 3. The cold season was a significantly better season for DFI and FCR. The week of the fattening period significantly affected the three productive traits studied, increasing their values almost every week. The stress levels significantly affected the three productive traits studied. The rabbits with the lowest stress levels had lower values for the three productive traits studied.
The parameters depend on the season, warm or cold, with a DFI of 76.81 g/d in summer and 80.37 g/d in winter, which leads to a higher feed consumption in the cold season, and an ADG of 24.96 g/d in summer and 27.39 g/d in winter, which increases the rabbits’ weight in the cold season. The FCR is 3.29 in summer and 3.22 in winter, which therefore makes it a better indicator in the cold season.
Depending on the level of stress, there are also changes in the productive parameters. The DFI is 44.71 g/d in non-stressed animals, but as high as 90.41 g/d in highly-stressed animals, producing a higher feed consumption the more stressed the rabbits are. The ADG ranges from 22.45 g/d in non-stressed animals to 29.14 g/d in highly-stressed animals, which results in a greater weight increase in rabbits with higher stress levels. FCR increases with the stress levels of rabbits, with 2.53 in non-stressed animals and up to 3.24 in highly-stressed animals.
The evolution of the fattening performance parameters depending on the THI and stress levels (quadratic regression analysis) is shown in Figure 1. As shown by the equations, the DFI decreased as THI increased, in contrast to stress levels. ADG was inversely proportional to THI and directly proportional to stress levels. FCR was directly proportional to THI and stress levels. Even though the three equations have been significant (p < 0.001), the best adjustments (R2 = 0.17) have been produced with the DIF and FCR variables.

4. Discussion

Daily feed intake, ADG and FCR are among the most essential performance parameters when evaluating productive efficiency during fattening on a rabbit farm [28]: they affect productive efficiency and are influenced by the animals’ welfare. Of these, FCR is the most important parameter from an economic point of view [29,30]. The FCR of the rabbits in this study was lower than the value obtained by González-Redondo [43] for this same breed (3.46 at 63 days of age) and slightly higher than that obtained by Feki et al. [52] in selected lines (3).
Average Daily Gain showed a lower mean value than that found by González-Redondo [43] for this strain (34.0 ± 0.93 g/day) and by Rodellar et al. [53] for Spanish Common rabbits (31.8 ± 1.77 g/day), and this value is below the normal values in select lines of young rabbits (38–48 g/d; [52]). The ADG in countries with a consolidated rabbit industry ranges from 30 to 46 g/day [54,55,56,57,58], and can be as high as 50 g/day on commercial farms which use highly prolific maternal lines and high-growth paternal lines [59,60].
Daily feed intake showed an average value (77.80 ± 1.34 g/day) lower than that of selected lines, which usually present values of around 105 g/day [58].
The low ADG and DFI values observed in the animals in this study are due to the fact that it is an unimproved rustic breed, like the Ibizan rabbit [61], and a breed with little genetic potential for feed consumption, as indicated by Ponce de León et al. [62] for the rustic Cuban semi-giant breed, and with low growth potential [63]. According to Gupta et al. [64], FCR and DFI are influenced by breed, as is ADG [65]. Lebas et al. [66] showed that the productive performance, under similar environmental and nutritional conditions, is specific to each breed, due to the genetic differences between them.
Consistent with Gupta et al. [64], we found a higher DFI in the cold season (80.30 ± 2.63 g/day) than in the warm season (76.21 ± 1.42 g/day). Similarly, we also coincided with Sabah and Dalal [67] and Gupta et al. [64], who observed seasonal differences in FCR, which was higher in the warm season than in the cold season. As in the works by Ramon et al. [68] and Ondruska et al. [69], ADG decreases as the temperature increases. Heat conditions have a negative impact on growth, due to a series of effects that can be explained through heat stress response [70]. Rabbits are highly sensitive to heat because they have very few sweat glands and these are not distributed throughout their body; they therefore have great difficulty in eliminating body heat when the ambient temperature is high and so are prone to stress [71].
The peripheral thermal receptors are triggered to induce the center of appetite in the hypothalamus to cause a decrease in DFI [72] and ADG, and an increase in FCR [71]. The high ambient temperature induces rabbits to stabilize their body heat by dissipating their latent heat, which affects the metabolic balance of water, proteins, energy and minerals, enzymatic reactions, hormonal secretions and blood metabolites [73]. During heat stress, animals increase their heat loss through the vaporization of water during respiration [71]. Heat stress not only has negative effects on growth characteristics, but also on reproduction and reduced resistance to diseases [74]. The temperature-humidity index had a significant effect on ADG and DFI, showing that THI is an optimal tool to assess the impact of heat and humidity, which often influence animals’ welfare and growth [75].
The sex of the animals had no significant effect on the productive parameters, which is normal in rabbits which have not reached sexual maturity [76], at which physiological moment the technical indices in males and females begin to diverge [77].
The handling of the animals during the fattening period had a significant influence on the productive parameters: with the increase in stress levels, there was a tendency towards increased DFI, ADG and FCR. Acute stress can induce hyperphagia with increased feed consumption [78], which turns to generate greater body weight [79]. López-Espinoza et al. [80] have also shown that there is an increase in feed consumption after the exposure to stress has ended, and in other species such as rats, feed intake acts as a comforter which reduces the stress response [81]. Nkrumah et al. [82] and Llonch et al. [83] have shown in other species that the response to handling is associated with temperament, with the most temperamental animals being the least efficient. In our trial, due to the hyperphagia produced by stress, animals which are more reactive to the effect of handling consume more feed, thus increasing ADG, but not efficiently, which leads to a higher FCR. From a livestock point of view, these animals are more temperamental and with a greater capacity to react to stress. Therefore, they are not of great interest from the point of view of feeding efficiency.
Both during and just after the action of the stressful agent, there is a suppression of feed intake induced by the action of the hormones, noradrenaline [84] and corticotropin [85], which allows the animals to carry out a response. Rabbits react with flight, for which energy is required, thus inhibiting other operations of the metabolism, including the digestive system [86].
Eating in response to stress is a common means of relief and gratification in animals [87]. As a result, stress is positively associated with body weight [88]. Acute exposure to stress produces more important metabolic changes than chronic stress [89]: the increase in FCR is due to the alteration of animal welfare that negatively affects the animals’ efficiency, making them less productive [90]. Even though one of the main objectives of the domestication process is to suppress unwanted responses to extreme fear [5], domesticated animals still shy away from humans [91].
The stress level of the rabbit examined jointly with THI exerts a greater influence on DFI, ADG and FCR than THI alone. According to Oseni and Poopola [92], the overall environment could be described as comfortable, since the average THI values in both seasons were below 23. The increase in FCR with THI and the stress level of each individual show that the animals are less efficient during fattening as the THI increases and the reactivity of each animal is higher [74,90].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, it has been shown that the performance parameters were altered by the action of weather conditions and the level of individual reactivity to a stressful effect, such as handling. As a result, the productive efficiency of the rabbits was higher in the cold season than in the warm season, when the lowest levels of individual reactivity were recorded. There were an increase in FCR and a decrease in ADG with increasing THI. With the increase in the ability to react to stress, there was a tendency to increase in DFI, ADG and FCR, which implies an overall decrease in the fattening performance. In addition, humidity, temperature and individual reactivity are suitable indicators which can be used to improve the rabbits’ welfare and production.
The use of rabbits with low reactivity and controlled climatic conditions could benefit rabbit welfare and productivity. These results could serve as a useful guide for productive management in fattening rabbits and the use of rustic breeds (which are better acclimatized to the local weather conditions) to benefit animal welfare in rabbit farming.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V. and P.G.-R.; methodology, M.V. and P.G.-R.; software, J.A.J.-T., M.J.S.-G.; validation, M.V. and P.G.-R.; formal analysis, J.A.J.-T. and M.J.S.-G.; investigation, J.A.J.-T., M.J.S.-G.; resources, M.V. and P.G.-R.; data curation, M.J.S.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.J.-T.; writing—review M.J.S.-G., M.V. and P.G.-R.; editing, M.V. and P.G.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The trial was carried out in accordance with the Spanish legislation [45] and the Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes [46], and the experimental protocol was approved (Ref. 25583347/2015) by the Escuela Internacional de Doctorado of the University of Seville (Spain).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank José Ignacio López-Campos for his help in the care and management of the rabbits. This manuscript is part of a PhD thesis written by Juan Antonio Jaén-Téllez.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parsons, P. Behavioral, stress and variability. Behav. Genet. 1988, 18, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morton, D. Behaviour of rabbits and rodent. In The Ethology of Domestic Animal; Jensen, P., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2002; pp. 193–209. [Google Scholar]
  3. Welfare, E.P. on A.H. and Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to “The Impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits”. EFSA J. 2005, 3, 267–271.
  4. Stodart, E.; Myers, K. A comparison of behaviour, reproduction and mortality of wild and domestic rabbits in confined populations. CSIRO Wildl. Res. 1964, 9, 144–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Price, E. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 1984, 59, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Csatádi, K.; Kustos, K.; Eiben, C.; Bilkó, Á.; Altbäcker, V. Even minimal human contact linked to nursing reduces fear responses toward humans in rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 95, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Andrade, O.; Orihuela, A.; Solano, J.; Galina, C. Some effects of repeated handling and the use of a mask on stress responses in zebu cattle during restraint. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 71, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zucca, D.; Redaelli, V.; Marelli, S.P.; Bonazza, V.; Heinzl, E.; Verga, M.; Luzi, F. Effect of handling in pre-weaning rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2012, 20, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schoen, A.; Wynn, S. Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine; Editorial Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ogunjimi, L.; Ogunwande, G.; Osunade, J. Influence of building environment on rabbit weight gain, feed efficiency, rectal temperature and respiration rate in the humid tropical climate of Southwestern Nigeria. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2008, X, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Finzi, A.; Daader, A.; Yamani, K.; Askar, A. Influence of high chronic relative humidity on semen quality of hot stressed bucks. In Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association (WRSA), Valencia, Spain, 4–7 July 2000; pp. 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marai, I.F.M.; Hareeb, A.A.M.; Gad, A. Rabbits’ productive, reproductive and physiological performance traits as affected by heat stress: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 78, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fayez, I.; Marai, M.; Alnaimy, A.; Habeeb, M. Thermoregulation in rabbits. In Rabbit production in hot climates. Zaragoza CIHEAM Cah. Opitions Méditerranéennes 1994, 8, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zeferino, C.; Moura, A.; Fernandes, S.; Kanayama, J.; Scapinello, C.; Sarton, J. Genetic group x ambient temperature interaction effects on physiological response and growth performance of rabbits. Livest. Sci. 2011, 140, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bianca, W. The significance of meteorology in animal production. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1976, 20, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pla, M.; Fernandez-Carmona, J.; Blas, E.; Cervera, C. Growth and some carcass traits of adult rabbits under high ambient temperature. World Rabbit Sci. 1994, 2, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Asemota, O.; Aduba, P.; Bello-Onaghise, G.; Orheruata, A. Effect of temperature humidity index (THI) on the performance of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the humid tropics. Arch. Zootec. 2017, 66, 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wingfield, J.; Hunt, K.; Breuner, C.; Dunlap, K.; Fowler, G.; Freed, L.; Lepson, J. Environmental stress, field endocrinology, and conservation biology. In Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild; Clemmons, J.R., Buchholz, R., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; pp. 95–131. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cunningham, J. Fisiología veterinaria, 2nd ed.; McGraw Hill Interamericana: Mexico D.F., Mexico, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  20. Axelrod, J.; Reisine, T.D. Stress hormones: Their interaction and regulation. Sciencia 1984, 244, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Burrow, H.; Corbet, N. Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2000, 51, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Richardson, E.; Herd, R. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. Part 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2004, 44, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Monclús, R.; Rödel, H.G.; Palme, R.; von Holst, D.; De Miguel, J. Non-invasive measurement of the physiological stress response of wild rabbits to the odour of a predator. Chemoecology 2006, 16, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cabezas, S.; Blas, J.; Marchant, T.; Moreno, S. Physiological stress levels predict survival probabilities in wild rabbits. Horm. Behav. 2007, 51, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Broom, D. Animal welfare: Concepts, study methods and indicators. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pec. 2011, 24, 306–321. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kowalska, D.; Gugoleka, A.; Bielansky, P. Effect of stress on rabbit meat quality. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2011, 11, 465–475. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cafe, L.; Robinson, D.; Ferguson, D.; McIntyre, B.; Geesink, G.; Greenwood, P. Cattle temperament: Persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 1452–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cartuche, L.; Pascua, L.; Gómez, E.; Blasco, A. Economic weights in rabbit meat production. World Rabbit Sci. 2014, 22, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Armero, Q.; Blasco, A. Economic weights for rabbit selection indices. J. Appl. Rabbit Res. 1992, 15, 637–642. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gidenne, T.; Garreau, H.; Drouilhet, L.; Aubert, C.; Maertens, L. Improving feed efficiency in rabbit production, a review on nutritional, technico-economical, genetic and environmental aspects. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 225, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Möstl, E.; Palme, R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2002, 23, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Von der Ohe, C.; Servheen, C. Measuring stress in mammal using fecal glucocorticoids: Opportunities and challenges. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2002, 30, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaén-Téllez, J.; Sánchez-Guerrero, M.; López-Campos, J.; Valera, M.; González-Redondo, P. Acute stress assessment using infrared thermography in fattening rabbits reacting to handling under winter and summer conditions. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2020, 18, e0592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Unruh, E.; Theurer, M.; White, B.; Larson, R.; Drouillard, J.; Scharg, N. Evaluation of infrared thermography as a diagnostic tool to predict heat stress events in feedlot cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2017, 78, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stewart, M.; Webster, J.R.; Schaefer, A.L.; Cook, N.J.; Scott, S.L. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2005, 14, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakayama, K.; Goto, S.; Kuraoka, K.; Nakamura, K. Decrease in nasal temperature of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in negative emotional state. Physiol. Behav. 2005, 84, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McCafferty, D. Applications of thermal imaging in avian science. Int. J. Avian Sci. Ibis 2013, 155, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Weschenfelder, A.; Saucier, L.; Madague, X.; Rocha, L.; Schaefer, A.; Faucitano, L. Use of infrared ocular thermography to asses physiological conditions of pigs prior to slaughter and predict pork quality variation. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Travain, T.; Colombo, E.S.; Heinzl, E.; Bellucci, D.; Previde, E.; Valsecchi, P. Hot dogs: Thermography in the assessment of stress in dogs (Canis familiaris)—A pilot study. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2015, 10, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sánchez, M.J.; Bartolomé, E.; Valera, M. Genetic study of stress assessed with infrared thermography during dressage competitions in the Pura Raza Español horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 174, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ludwig, N.; Gargano, M.; Luzi, F.; Carenzi, C.; Verga, M. Technical note: Applicability of infrared thermography as a non invasive measurements of stress in rabbit. World Rabbit Sci. 2007, 15, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Emam, A.; Afonso, S.; González-Redondo, P.; Mehaisen, G.; Azoz, A.; Ahmed, N. Status and origin of Egyptian local rabbits in comparison with Spanish common rabbits using mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis. World Rabbit Sci. 2020, 28, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. González-Redondo, P. Resultados preliminares de rendimiento reproductivo y de engorde de un núcleo de cría de conejos de tipo Común Doméstico Español. In Proceedings of the XLI Symposium de Cunicultura, Hondarribia, Spain, 12–13 May 2016; pp. 180–185. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación Resolución de la Dirección General de Producciones y Mercados Agrarios, por la que se Aprueban las Reglamentaciones Específicas de los Libros Genealógicos y los Programas de Mejora de las Razas Cunícolas Gigante de España y Antiguo Pardo Español, de Conformidad con lo Dispuesto en el Real Decreto 2129/2008, de 26 de Diciembre 2018. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/zootecnia/resolucionreglamentacionesrazasgigantedeespanayantiguopardoespanolfirmada_tcm30-479539.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  45. Ministerio de la Presidencia Real Decreto 53/2013, de 1 de febrero, por el que se establecen las normas básicas aplicables para la protección de los animales utilizados en experimentación y otros fines científicos, incluyendo la docencia. Boletín Oficial del Estado 2013, 34, 11370–11421.
  46. European Parliament and Council Directive 20102010/63/EU of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes. Official J. European Union. 2010, L276, 33–79.
  47. Chapel, J.; Benedito, J.; Hernández, J.; Pereira, V.; Domínguez, R.; Castillo, C. Técnicas de manejo y sujeción del conejo doméstico. Consult. Difusión Vet. 2015, 221, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bartolomé, E.; Sánchez, M.J.; Molina, A.; Schaefer, A.L.; Cervantes, I.; Valera, M. Using eye temperature and heart rate for stress assessment in young horses competing in jumping competitions and its possible influence on sport performance. Animal 2013, 7, 2044–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Marai, I.F.M.; Ayyatand, M.S.; Abd-El-Monem, U. Growth performance and reproductive traits at first parity of New Zealand White female rabbits as affected by heat stress and its alleviation under egyptian conditions. Trop. Animal Health Prod. 2001, 33, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. SAS. SAS/Stat User´s Guide; SAS: Cary, NC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  51. Littell, R.; Henry, P.; Ammerman, C. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 1216–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Feki, S.; Baselga, M.; Blas, E.; Cervera, C.; Gómez, E. Comparison of growth and feed efficiency among rabbit lines selected for different objectives. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1996, 45, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rodellar, C.; Zaragoza, P.; Osta, R. Estimación de distintos parámetros productivos en la raza de conejos Común Español. In Proceedings of the XIV Symposium de Cunicultura, Manresa, Spain, 12–14 June 1989; pp. 37–150. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chiericato, G.; Rizzi, C.; Rostellato, V. Effect of genotype and environmental conditions in the productive and slaughtering performance of growing meat rabbits 1. World Rabbit Sci. 1993, 1, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  55. Roberts, J.; Lukefarhr, S. Evaluation of Californian, Champagne d´Argent, New Zealand White and Palomino as potential sire breeds: I. Postweaning litter performances. J. Appl. Rabbit Res. 1992, 15, 274. [Google Scholar]
  56. Remois, G.; Lafargue-Hauret, P.; Bourdillon, A.; Rouillere, H. Effect of weaning weight on growth performance of rabbits. In Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association (WRSA), Toulouse, France, 9–12 July 1996; pp. 237–240. [Google Scholar]
  57. Prayaga, K.; Eady, S. Rabbit farming for meat production in Australia: Preliminary estimates of economic values for production traits. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13, 57–359. [Google Scholar]
  58. Orengo, J.; Piles, M.; Rafel, O.; Ramón, E. Gómez Crossbreeding parameters for growth and feed consumption traits from a five diallel mating scheme in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 1896–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Garcia-Ruiz, A.; Garcia-Palomares, J.; Garcia-Rebollar, P.; Chamorro, S.; Carabaño, R.; De Blas, J. Effect of protein source and enzyme supplementation on ileal protein digestibility and fattening performance in rabbits. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2006, 4, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gidenne, T.; De Dapper, J.; Lapanouse, A.; Aymard, P. Adaptation du lapereau á un aliment fibreuxdistribuéavantsevrage: Comportementd’ingestion, croissance et santé digestive. In Proceedings of the 2èmes Journées Recherche Cunicole, Toulouse, France, 4–5 April 1978; pp. 1–112. [Google Scholar]
  61. Formoso-Rafferty, N.; García-García, R.; Rodríguez, M.; Alonso, A.; Masdeu, M.; Millán, P.; Arias-Álvarez, M.; Lorenzo, L.; Rebollar, P. Reproductive and endocrine characterization of Ibicean rabbit breed. Arch. Zootec. 2016, 65, 525–534. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ponce de León, R.; Guzmán, G.; Pubillones, O.; García, J.; Mora, M. Comportamiento de razas de conejos importadas. Evaluación del crecimiento posdestete. Rev. Cuba. Cienc. Agrícola 2002, 36, 23–329. [Google Scholar]
  63. González-Redondo, P. Estado de las poblaciones y posibilidades de recuperación del conejo doméstico común español. In Proceedings of the IV Jornadas Ibéricas de Razas Autóctonas y sus Productos Tradicionales: Innovación, Seguridad y Cultura Alimentaria, Sevilla, Spain, 30 November–1 December 2007; pp. 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gupta, R.; Prabhakar Rao, V.; Eswara Reddy, C.; Satyanarayana, A.; Reddy, P. Feed intake and feed conversion ratio in purebred and crossbred broiler rabbits. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2000, 34, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  65. Medellin, M.; Lukefahr, S. Breed and heterotic effects on postweaning traits in Altex and New Zealand White straightbred and crossbred rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 79, 1173–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lebas, F.; Coudert, P.; de Rochambeau, H.; Thébault, R.; Rouvier, R.; de Rochambeau, H. The Rabbit—Husbandry, Health and Production; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sabah Abd Al-Rahman, A.; Dalal Abd Al-Sattar, A. Effect of the thermal changes on physiological, biochemical and histological traits in pregnant and embryo of New Zealand white rabbits. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Res. 2016, 6, 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ramon, J.; Gomez, E.; Perucho, O.; Rafel, O.; Baselga, M. Feed efficiency and postweaning growth of several Spanish selected lines. In Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association (WRSA), Tolouse, France, 9–12 July 1996; pp. 351–353. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ondruska, L.; Rafay, J.; Okab, A.; Ayoub, M.; Al-Haidary, A.; Samara, E.; Parkanyi, V.; Chrastinova, L.; Jurcik, R.; Massanyi, P.; et al. Influence of elevated ambient temperature upon some physiological measurements of New Zealand White rabbits. Vet. Med. 2011, 56, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Okab, A.; El-Banna, S.; Koriem, A. Influence of environmental temperatures on some physiological and biochemical parameters of male New-Zealand rabbits. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 41, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  71. Chiericato, G.; Bailoni, L.; Rizzi, C. The effect of environmental temperature on the performance of growing rabbits. J. Appl. Rabbit Res. 1992, 15, 723–731. [Google Scholar]
  72. Marai, I.; Habeeb, A.; Gad, A. Biological functions in young pregnant rabbit does as affected by heat stress and lighting regime under subtropical conditions of Egypt. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 2007, 7, 165–176. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kasa, I.; Thwaites, C. The effect of infrared radiation on rectal temperature and respiration rate of unacclimated female New Zealand white rabbits. J. Therm. Biol. 1992, 17, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Odeon, M.M.; Romera, S.A. Estrés en ganado: Causas y consecuencias. Rev. Vet. 2017, 28, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hahn, G.; Gauchan, J.; Mader, T.; Eigenberg, R. Chapter 5: Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments. In Livestock Energetics and Thermal Environmental Management; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2009; pp. 113–130. [Google Scholar]
  76. Paci, G.; Preziuso, G.; D’Agata, M.; Russo, C.; Dalle-Zote, A. Effect of stocking density and group size on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of outdoor-reared rabbits. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lazzaroni, C.; Biagini, D.; Lussiana, C. Different rearing systems for fattening rabbits: Performance and carcass characteristics. Meat Sci. 2009, 82, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. McMillan, F. Stress-induced and emotional eating in animals: A review of the experimental evidence and implications for companion animal obesity. J. Vet. Behav. 2013, 8, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Silveira, P.; Xavier, M.; Souza, F.; Manoli, L.; Rosat, R.; Ferreira, M.; Dalmaz, C. Interaction between repeated restraint stress and concomitant midazolam administration on sweet food ingestion in rats. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2000, 33, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. López-Espinoza, A.; Moreno, A.M.; Franco, K.; Aguilera, V.; Cardenas-Villalvazo, A.; Valdes-Miramontes, E.; Magaña, C.; Macías, A.; Santoyo, F.; Rezéndis, F.D. Estrés & Comportamiento Alimentario. Modelo Bioconductual de Estrés-Alimentación; Cuevas, S., Ed.; Manual moderno: Mexico D.F., Mexico, 2012; pp. 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ortolani, D.; Oyama, L.; Ferrari, E.; Melo, L.; Spadari-Bratfisch, R. Effects of comfort food on food intake, anxiety-like behavior and the stress response in rats. Physiol. Behav. 2011, 103, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Nkrumah, J.; Crews, D.; Basarab, J.; Price, M.; Okine, E.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.; Moore, S. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 2382–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Llonch, P.; Somarriba, M.; Duthie, C.; Haskell, M.; Rooke, J.; Troy, S.; Roehe, S.; Turner, S. Association of temperament and acute stress responsiveness with productivity, feed efficiency, and methane emissions in beef cattle: An observational study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Halford, J. Pharmacology of appetite suppression: Implication for the treatment of obesity. Curr. Drug Targets 2001, 2, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Takeda, E.; Terao, J.; Nakaya, Y.; Miyamoto, K.; Baba, Y.; Chuman, H.; Ryuji, K.; Ohmori, T.; Rokutan, K. Stress control and human nutrition. J. Med. Investig. 2004, 51, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gómez, B.; Escobar, A. Estrés y sistema inmune. Rev. Mex. Neurocienc. 2006, 7, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ans, A.; Anjum, I.; Satija, V.; Inayat, A.; Asghar, Z.; Akram, I.; Shrestha, B. Neurohormonal regulation of appetite and its relationship with stress: A mini literature review. Cureus 2018, 10, e3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Torres, S.; Nowson, C. Relationship between stress, eating behavior and obesity. Nutrition 2007, 23, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Rostamkhani, F.; Zardooz, H.; Zahediasl, S.; Farrokhi, B. Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic psychological stress on metabolic features in rats. J. Zhejiang Univ. B 2012, 13, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Marai, I.; Rashwan, A. Rabbit behavioural response to climatic and managerial conditions—A review. Arch. Tierzucht 2004, 7, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rushen, J.; Taylor, A.; de Passilé, A. Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 65, 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oseni, S.; Popoola, M. Doe fertility and weaning survival rate of composite rabbits as affected by thermal environment in the humid tropical climate of Southwestern Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2013, 2, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
Animals 11 01747 g001 550
Figure 1. Quadratic regression analysis between stress level (x axis), THI (y axis) and DFI, ADG and FCR (z axis). The quadratic equation that predicts the DFI, ADG and FCR values is shown at the top of each figure, while the adjustment parameters of the R-square (R2) model, mean square error (RMSE) and p-value, are shown on the top right-hand side of each figure. DFI: Daily feed intake, ADG: Average daily gain, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, THI: Temperature-humidity index. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Quadratic regression analysis between stress level (x axis), THI (y axis) and DFI, ADG and FCR (z axis). The quadratic equation that predicts the DFI, ADG and FCR values is shown at the top of each figure, while the adjustment parameters of the R-square (R2) model, mean square error (RMSE) and p-value, are shown on the top right-hand side of each figure. DFI: Daily feed intake, ADG: Average daily gain, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, THI: Temperature-humidity index. *** p < 0.001.
Animals 11 01747 g001
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of fattening performance of rabbits, in the warm and cold seasons.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of fattening performance of rabbits, in the warm and cold seasons.
VariablesNMean ± SEMinimumMaximumC.V. (%)
Both seasonsTBW (g)391383.38 ± 40.42577.301746.0018.25
TWG (g)39940.18 ± 30.91350.501276.1030.90
TFI (g)392956.57 ± 94.851390.703771.8019.72
ADG (g/d)3925.80 ± 0.461.7058.7035.24
DFI (g/d)3977.80 ± 1.349.40163.7034.32
FCR393.18 ± 0.060.556.6634.55
THI3919.41 ± 0.2611.3430.2926.42
Warm seasonTBW (g)221335.49 ± 52.66577.301721.1018.50
TWG (g)22924.94 ± 35.60352.801106.1018.05
TFI (g)222901.87 ± 119.901390.703754.1019.38
ADG (g/d)2224.79 ± 0.522.8358.7032.66
DFI (g/d)2276.21 ± 1.429.40121.7029.03
FCR223.24 ± 0.070.556.5033.95
THI2222.95 ± 0.2017.1930.2913.60
Cold seasonTBW (g)171445.39 ± 61.36809.301746.0017.50
TWG (g)17961.72 ± 17.79350.501276.1023.50
TFI (g)173027.35 ± 50.311499.003771.8021.12
ADG (g/d)1727.39 ± 0.831.7049.5737.61
DFI (g/d)1780.30 ± 2.6313.13163.7040.56
FCR173.08 ± 0.091.196.6635.45
THI1713.81 ± 0.0911.3415.357.71
TBW: Total body weight. TWG: Total weight gain. TFI: Total feed intake. DFI: Daily feed intake, ADG: Average daily gain, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, THI: Temperature-humidity index.
Table
Table 2. General lineal model of repeated measures of analyzed traits related to the behavior of fattening rabbits.
Table 2. General lineal model of repeated measures of analyzed traits related to the behavior of fattening rabbits.
FactorsDegrees of FreedomDFIADGFCR
F-Testp-ValueF-Testp-ValueF-Testp-Value
Sex10.220.6390.020.8970.000.952
Stress level316.38<0.0014.690.0034.050.008
THI17.670.03912.050.0185.810.061
Season17.250.0070.170.67615.89<0.001
Sex*Stress level30.720.5382.120.0970.680.565
Sex*Season10.170.6780.760.3853.290.071
Season*Stress level20.330.7210.490.6150.000.952
DFI: Daily feed intake, ADG: Average daily gain, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, THI: Temperature-humidity index. A p-value lower than 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table
Table 3. Tukey-Kramer post-hoc least squared means test analysis of the significant environmental effects on Daily feed intake (DFI), Average daily gain (ADG) and Feed conversion ratio (FCR) in fattening rabbits.
Table 3. Tukey-Kramer post-hoc least squared means test analysis of the significant environmental effects on Daily feed intake (DFI), Average daily gain (ADG) and Feed conversion ratio (FCR) in fattening rabbits.
Season
Warm seasonCold season
DFI (g/d)76.81 a80.37 b
ADG (g/d)24.96 a27.39 a
FCR3.29 b3.22 a
Week of Fattening Period
123456
DFI (g/d)52.00 a60.93 a78.68 b90.98 b,c94.09 c103.75 b,c
ADG (g/d)25.88 a,b23.89 a27.75 a,b26.96 a,b23.65 a30.77 b
FCR2.34 a2.88 a,b3.12 b,c3.54 c,d4.18 d3.48 b,c,d
Stress Level
1234
DFI (g/d)44.71 a75.21 b81.06 b90.41 c
ADG (g/d)22.45 a26.22 a,b24.25 a29.14 b
FCR2.53 a3.16 a3.59 b3.24 a,b
Level 1 (not stressed, 19 records): Inner ear DIF ≤ 0 °C; Level 2 (slightly stressed, 243 records): 0 °C < Inner ear DIF ≤ 5 °C; Level 3 (stressed, 134 records): 5 °C < Inner ear DIF ≤ 10 °C and Level 4 (very stressed, 60 records): Inner ear DIF > 10 °C DFI: Daily feed intake, ADG: Average daily gain, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, THI: Temperature-humidity index. Different superscript letters (a–d) indicate significant differences between the values.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaén-Téllez, J.A.; Sánchez-Guerrero, M.J.; Valera, M.; González-Redondo, P. Influence of Stress Assessed through Infrared Thermography and Environmental Parameters on the Performance of Fattening Rabbits. Animals 2021, 11, 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061747

AMA Style

Jaén-Téllez JA, Sánchez-Guerrero MJ, Valera M, González-Redondo P. Influence of Stress Assessed through Infrared Thermography and Environmental Parameters on the Performance of Fattening Rabbits. Animals. 2021; 11(6):1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaén-Téllez, Juan Antonio, María José Sánchez-Guerrero, Mercedes Valera, and Pedro González-Redondo. 2021. "Influence of Stress Assessed through Infrared Thermography and Environmental Parameters on the Performance of Fattening Rabbits" Animals 11, no. 6: 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop