Next Article in Journal
Egg Quality from Nera Atriana, a Local Poultry Breed of the Abruzzo Region (Italy), and ISA Brown Hens Reared under Free Range Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Mixed Invasions of Hypoderma bovis and Ostertagia ostertagi in Cattle on Milk Yield and Contents in Polish Dairy Farms
Previous Article in Journal
Indoors or Outdoors? An International Exploration of Owner Demographics and Decision Making Associated with Lifestyle of Pet Cats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Age-Related Cryptosporidium Species Distribution in Asymptomatic Cattle from North-Western Spain

by
Pablo Díaz
*,
Esther Navarro
,
Susana Remesar
,
David García-Dios
,
Néstor Martínez-Calabuig
,
Alberto Prieto
,
Gonzalo López-Lorenzo
,
Ceferino Manuel López
,
Rosario Panadero
,
Gonzalo Fernández
,
Pablo Díez-Baños
and
Patrocinio Morrondo
Department of Animal Pathology (INVESAGA Group), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(2), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020256
Submission received: 28 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 18 January 2021 / Published: 20 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasitic Diseases of Cattle)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

An age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium species has been reported in cattle, with the pathogenic and zoonotic C. parvum being predominant in suckling calves, C. bovis and C. ryanae being predominant in post-weaned calves and C. andersoni being predominant in adults. However, variants to this pattern have recently been reported. Unravelling the age-related species distribution pattern in cattle from a particular region will allow determining those age classes posing a higher risk to public and animal health. Thus, fecal samples from asymptomatic cattle were collected in north-western Spain. Cryptosporidium detection and species identification was performed by molecular methods. Cryptosporidium prevalence was 16.7%; it significantly decreased with age. Cryptosporidium andersoni, C. bovis, C. occultus, C. parvum, C. ryanae and C. xiaoi were identified. Cryptosporidium parvum was predominant in calves younger than 1 month and C. bovis was predominant in the rest of the age groups. The presence of C. parvum in all age groups implies animal and public health concerns. The predominance of C. bovis in cattle older than 1 month supports the idea that the age-related pattern of Cryptosporidium species described in cattle is not fully consistent, and thus further studies are needed to identify those factors determining the species distribution.

Abstract

An age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium species has been reported in cattle, with C. parvum being predominant in suckling calves, C. bovis and C. ryanae being predominant in post-weaned calves and C. andersoni being predominant in adults. However, variants to this pattern have recently been reported. Thus, fecal samples (n = 594) from asymptomatic cattle were collected in north-western Spain. Animals were classified as <1 month (G1), 1–2 months (G2), 2–12 months (G3), 12–24 months (G4) and >2 years (G5). Cryptosporidium detection and species identification were performed by SSU rRNA PCR. Individual Cryptosporidium prevalence was 16.7%; it significantly decreased with age. Cryptosporidium parvum was predominant in G1 and C. bovis was predominant in the rest of the age classes; C. bovis and C. ryanae were especially prevalent in G2 and G3. Cryptosporidium occultus was not found in suckling calves. Finally, C. andersoni and C. xiaoi were occasionally detected in G5. The presence of C. parvum in all age classes implies significant animal and public health concerns. The predominance of C. bovis in cattle older than 1 month supports the idea that the age-related pattern of Cryptosporidium species described in cattle is not fully consistent, and thus further studies are still needed to identify those factors determining the species distribution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are worldwide distributed apicomplexan protozoans causing gastrointestinal infections in a wide range of animal hosts, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish [1]. Some species mainly infect humans and spread through anthroponotic transmission (Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium viatorum), but animals could be reservoirs of other species also related to human cryptosporidiosis outbreaks, such as Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium meleagridis, Cryptosporidium cuniculus, Cryptosporidium canis or Cryptosporidium felis [1,2,3]. It has been widely demonstrated that C. parvum is the main zoonotic species [2,3,4], and domestic ruminants, especially cattle, are considered its most important reservoirs [5,6,7].
Application of molecular tools to the diagnosis of cryptosporidial infections in cattle has allowed the identification of more than 18 species and genotypes [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Due to the negative impact of cryptosporidiosis on cattle farm profitability [15], most research has focused on diarrheic outbreaks in pre-weaned calves, allowing the identification of C. parvum as the main species causing clinical illness [6,16,17]. However, a comprehensive analysis of available data from cattle worldwide has consistently demonstrated the presence of four major species including C. parvum together with the host-adapted C. andersoni, C. bovis and C. ryanae, mainly related to asymptomatic infections [6,18]. A number of investigations have also reported that the global distribution of these four Cryptosporidium species is age-related, with C. parvum being predominant in suckling calves, whereas C. bovis and C. ryanae are mostly found in post-weaned calves and C. andersoni in yearlings and adult cattle [6,12,19,20,21,22,23,24]. These results suggest that only pre-weaned calves, the major carriers of the zoonotic and pathogenic species C. parvum, pose a risk for both animal and public health. Nevertheless, a number of variants to this pattern have recently been reported. It has been suggested that these differences are probably due to the methodology used as well as the diverse geographic or animal management practices [25,26]. Unravelling the specific age-related species distribution pattern in cattle from a particular region will be helpful to understand the transmission dynamics of cryptosporidial infections in cattle farms as well as to determine those age classes mostly infected by zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and posing a higher risk to public health. In addition, identification of the major C. parvum carriers will allow implementing the most suitable control measures to reduce the economic impact of neonatal calf diarrhea outbreaks in cattle farms.
In Spain, the only investigations analyzing a possible age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium species in cattle were carried out in dairy cattle from Galicia (north-western Spain), showing an unusual pattern, since C. parvum was the most prevalent species in all age classes, with the presence of C. andersoni in heifers and adults; surprisingly, neither C. bovis nor C. ryanae were identified [27,28,29]. In order to confirm the age distribution of Cryptosporidium species and to provide updated and more robust data from cattle in that region, fecal samples from both pre-weaned and post-weaned calves, yearlings and adults from beef and dairy farms from the same study area (north-western Spain) were molecularly analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Approval Statement

All fecal samples used in this study were collected from cattle by veterinary surgeons with the permission of farm owners. All experimental procedures fully complied with ethics regulations in Spain (Royal Decree 53/2013, on the protection of animals against cruelty; www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2013/02/01/53).

2.2. Study Area and Characteristics of Farms

All farms included in this study were located in Galicia (43°47′–41°49′ N; 6°42′–9°18′ W), in the northwest of Spain. This region is a very important livestock breeding area with both dairy and beef cattle raising being the most important livestock production; in fact, Galicia is the Spanish region with the highest census of dairy cattle as well as one of the most important beef cattle breeding areas of the country [30]. Nevertheless, the herd size is low, with a mean number of nineteen animals per farm [31]. Most dairy and beef cattle in Galicia are reared in small traditional family farms where animals go to pastures daily, although a number of dairy cattle farms have been modernized in recent years through the acquisition of farming machinery and better intensive production facilities, leading to an increase in herd size and productivity [31].

2.3. Sampling of Animals

A total of 594 fecal samples were collected in 86 and 60 dairy and beef Galician cattle farms, respectively, between 2016 and 2018. All farms were registered in cattle health defense associations (ADSG) and implemented a sanitary program. Selection of farms was performed by the veterinary surgeons responsible for the ADSGs, including only farms where no diarrheic outbreaks had been registered in suckling calves during the 12 months before sampling and no preventive treatments against Cryptosporidium spp. (halofuginone or paromomycin) had been administered. Individual fecal samples were taken directly from the rectum by the ADSG veterinary surgeons. No animals showed gastrointestinal clinical signs when sampled. Fecal consistency was scored according to Ireland-Perry and Stallings [32]; all samples were firm to soft (scores 3–4) and thus considered non-diarrheic. Animal age was obtained from official documentation. The age of sampled animals ranged from 2 days to 16.8 years old. Five groups were formed considering the age of the animals: suckling calves younger than 1 month (G1; n = 108); pre-weaned calves aged 1–2 months (G2; n = 62); post-weaned calves aged 2–12 months (G3; n = 96); yearlings aged 12–24 months (G4; n = 116); and adults older than 2 years (G5; n = 212). Sample size was calculated for estimating the true population proportion in each group with a confidence interval of 95% (α error) and 90% precision (β error), according to previous reports in cattle from the same study area [29,33]. Fecal samples were kept at 4 °C and processed within 48 h after collection.

2.4. Molecular Methods

Cryptosporidium oocysts were firstly concentrated from 2 g of feces using a diphasic sedimentation technique as previously described [34]. Then, 200 mg of the sediment was subjected to three cycles of freeze–thaw (−196 °C for 1 min and 100 °C for 7 min) and later Cryptosporidium DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (Realpure Spin Food-Stool Kit; Real, Valencia, Spain) following the manufacturers’ instructions. Purified DNA was stored at −20 °C until used.
In order to detect the presence of Cryptosporidium DNA, a nested PCR targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene was performed, using previously described primers and protocols [35]. PCR products were separated after electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels and visualized in a Fluor-S Multimager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) after staining with RedSafe (INTRON biotecnology, Gyeonggi, Korea). Positive samples were directly sequenced in both directions in the Sequencing and Fragment Analysis Unit of the University of Santiago de Compostela using an ABI 3730xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and sequences were aligned and edited with Chromas Pro (Technelysium, Brisbane, Australia). Finally, consensus sequences were searched against the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to identify the species/genotypes present. When SSU rRNA sequences were not informative enough for reliable species identification, a further sequence analysis at the actin gene was performed [36].
Those isolates identified as C. parvum were also characterized at the gp60 gene using a nested PCR previously described [37]. Positive samples were sequenced as previously described, and subtypes were named as previously proposed [38].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A one-sided decreasing Cochran–Armitage test was used to check a trend in the Cryptosporidium prevalence. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was required for significance. All statistical procedures were conducted with R statistical language (R version 4.0.3, R Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), using the CochranArmitageTest() function from the DeskTools package.

3. Results

Cryptosporidium DNA was detected in 99 out of 594 samples (16.7%), and in 44.5% of farms, at least one positive animal was found. Sequence analysis allowed the identification of six Cryptosporidium species, with C. parvum (42/99) and C. bovis (36/99) being the most frequent, followed by C. ryanae (10/99) and C. occultus (7/99). Cryptosporidium andersoni (2/99) and C. xiaoi (1/99) were only occasionally found. One sample showed fainted bands and could not be correctly sequenced.
All the obtained partial SSU rRNA sequences were identical to the others deposited in the GenBank database. All C. andersoni sequences were 100% homologous to KT922228, and those identified as C. parvum matched with GQ983351, KU679364, KC886318 and MF589922. Most C. ryanae sequences were identical to KT922234, whereas a single C. ryanae sequence was identical to KY711520. Similarly, most C. bovis sequences coincided with MF074602, while two isolates were identical to KC618608 and EU827365, respectively. All C. occultus SSU rRNA sequences matched with MK982467, but they were also very similar (2 bp discrepancies) to the C. suis sequence JQ936502. For this reason, C. occultus identification was confirmed at the actin gene; our sequences were 100% homologous to MG699170, showing more than 20 bp discrepancies with C. suis sequences (AB852579). Finally, DNA sequencing of the SSU rRNA gene of the C. xiaoi isolate yielded a partial sequence with 100% similarity to C. xiaoi (KY055405) and C. bovis (EU827365) sequences; nevertheless, it matched with the C. xiaoi GU553017 sequence at the actin gene, showing an inter-isolate variance of 18 bp when compared with C. bovis AY741307.
The percentage of Cryptosporidium-positive animals significantly decreased (Z = 4.663; p < 0.001) with age and ranged from 28.7% in calves younger than one month to 9.9% in adult cattle (Figure 1). In contrast, the variability of Cryptosporidium spp. increased with age and ranged from three species found in calves younger than two months to six species identified in adult cattle (Figure 1). Only three species (C. bovis, C. parvum and C. ryanae) were detected in all age classes. Cryptosporidium parvum was the predominant species in the youngest calves (G1), although C. bovis was the most common in the rest of the age classes.
The prevalence of the six Cryptosporidium species found showed different patterns when considering the age classes (Figure 1). Suckling calves were the most commonly infected by C. parvum, especially G1 calves younger than one month. Cryptosporidium bovis was especially prevalent in calves aged 1–24 months (G2, G3, G4) and C. ryanae predominated in calves aged 2–12 months (G3). Cryptosporidium occultus was found in cattle older than 2 months and two species (C. andersoni and C. xiaoi) were detected sporadically and only in adult cattle.
Subtyping at the gp60 gene was successful in 30 (71.4%) C. parvum isolates; seven samples generated unreadable electropherograms, while five samples resulted negative (Table 1). Two subtypes belonging to the allele family IIa were detected: IIaA15G2R1 was the most common, whereas IIaA16G3R1 was only sporadically found (Table 1). All IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA16G3R1 sequences were identical to reference sequences JF727755 and DQ192506, respectively. The subtype IIaA15G2R1 was found in all age classes except for G3 calves aged 2–12 months (Table 1). In contrast, IIaA16G3R1 was only detected in calves younger than 12 months.

4. Discussion

Our results reveal that Cryptosporidium spp. is a prevalent parasite in asymptomatic cattle from north-western Spain. The percentage of infected animals found in the present study (16.7%) is consistent with previous studies in Spain and other countries worldwide reporting infection rates between 10% and 19% in healthy cattle [23,26,29,33,39,40,41,42,43], although infection rates up to 45% have also been found [10,44,45,46,47]. These variations could be a consequence of geographical differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infections, although other factors related to the sampling methodology, age of animals, herd size and management, hygiene of facilities or season of sampling may also be involved [48].
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was significantly highest in calves under 1 month of age and decreased progressively with age, which agrees with most studies indicating that this protozoan is most common in suckling calves [12,21,23,29,33,40,46,48,49,50]. It has been suggested that newborn calves are more susceptible to cryptosporidial infections due to their immature immune system [20], and the reduction in prevalence rates with age could be due to the development of a partial protective immune response after multiple infections with the protozoan [50]. In fact, a number of studies performed in several European countries, the USA, Brazil, China and Japan have shown that Cryptosporidium infection prevalence in healthy cattle older than 2 years is usually lower than 10% [20,23,28,29,33,39,40,46,51,52,53,54].
The six Cryptosporidium species identified in the present study have been previously reported in cattle. Four species (C. parvum, C. bovis, C. ryanae and C. andersoni) are considered the most common in cattle worldwide [3,6,18], while C. occultus and C. xiaoi have been sporadically detected [11,55]. Previous studies in China, the UK and the USA have shown age-related variations in the distribution of different Cryptosporidium spp. in both dairy and beef cattle, with C. parvum being responsible for most infections in pre-weaned calves under 2 months of age, whereas C. bovis and C. ryanae are found predominantly in post-weaned calves and C. andersoni is much more prevalent in yearlings and adult cattle [6,18,22,23,24]. However, other studies have found that cattle of all ages are susceptible to different Cryptosporidium species, suggesting that this may not be an age-related pattern. Thus, C. bovis has been reported as the most common species found in pre- and post-weaned calves in some cattle farms from China, India, Japan, Sri-Lanka, Sweden, the USA and Vietnam, whereas C. parvum is absent or present in low proportion [22,25,44,51,56,57]. Marked differences have been observed in cattle from some regions of China and Brazil where C. andersoni is present in all age classes and clearly predominant in animals older than 3 months of age [10,14,39,49,58,59].
The current study reveals differences in the age-related pattern abovementioned. C. parvum was the most prevalent species and predominated in calves younger than 1 month, but C. bovis was the most common in the remaining age classes, including calves aged 1–2 months and adult cattle. The role of C. parvum in the etiology of neonatal calf diarrhea is well recognized [6] and a previous study in this geographical area has shown a high infection rate of this species in diarrheic pre-weaned calves [16]. Small traditional family farms predominate in this geographical area, where the low density of animals may favor a progressive infection with a low number of oocysts if adequate hygienic and management measures are implemented, explaining the noticeable number of positive herds with no records of neonatal diarrhea in the last year [60]. Nevertheless, this study indicates that C. parvum is widely disseminated in asymptomatic cattle since it was found in all age classes and was the second most common species in adult cattle, which could play a role in farms as reservoirs of C. parvum for highly susceptible newborn calves. These findings also support the role of cattle of any age as a significant source of this zoonotic Cryptosporidium species for humans.
Cryptosporidium bovis is the second most commonly reported species in cattle worldwide, followed by C. ryanae [61]. Unlike C. parvum, these species have not been associated with diarrhea in cattle [62] and are mainly found in post-weaned calves and heifers [12,19,20,23,25,40,42,44,51,54,63,64]. Nevertheless, a few studies from China, Canada, India and Sweden have shown a dominance of C. bovis in pre-weaned calves, revealing that the age-related occurrence is not well defined and varies according to different factors, such as the geographic location or the herd management system [25,54,65,66,67]. In a beef herd monitored over three consecutive years, different species patterns were observed, with a predominance of C. bovis in the first year and a pre-dominance of C. parvum in the last year [68]. In this study, C. bovis was the second most prevalent species and was found in all age classes but predominated over C. parvum in calves aged 1–12 months, yearlings and adults. Cryptosporidium ryanae was sporadically detected in all age classes, which is consistent with the lower prevalence reported for this species worldwide, although most infected animals were those within the age range of 2–12 months [19,23,40,42,44,51,63]. It is worth mentioning that these two host-adapted species had not been reported in previous studies in cattle of different ages in Galicia [27,28,29]. Earlier studies have found that the infection dynamics of C. bovis/C. ryanae may be affected by the presence of C. parvum. In regions where C. parvum is endemic, such as the study area [16,33,34,35], it has been suggested that the high infection rate and shedding intensity of C. parvum in suckling calves younger than 1 month may conceal the concurrent infection of these animals by C. bovis or C. ryanae [25]. In dairy farms known to be free from C. parvum, the excretion of these species has been reported to start in the first three weeks, and the cumulative incidence of C. bovis reached 100% when the calves were five weeks old [67,69]. This dynamic has also been found in cattle reared in traditional husbandry systems in developing countries, where C. bovis and C. ryanae appear early in calves in the absence of C. parvum [70,71].
Cryptosporidium andersoni was identified in only two adult cows in this study, which agrees with previous reports in north-western Spain reporting a low prevalence for this species [27,28,29]. Some studies have concluded that C. andersoni only infects adult cattle, being considered the predominant Cryptosporidium spp. in this age class [4,19,20,23,53]. However, other studies have found a broader age range for C. andersoni [10,39,41,44,45,49], which has even been reported as the most prevalent species in suckling and post-weaned calves, heifers and adult cattle in some countries, especially Brazil and China [26,39,52,54]. It is significant to note the finding in this study of seven animals infected by C. occultus. This species was previously reported as C. suis-like in humans, cattle, water buffalo and domestic yaks [55] and has recently been identified in humans and rats in China [72,73,74]. Nevertheless, rats seem to be the primary host for this Cryptosporidium spp. and it has not been found infectious for calves under experimental conditions [55]. In farms with poor rodent control, it has been suggested that C. occultus may be only an intestinal transient in cattle as a result of the ingestion of food contaminated with feces of infected rodents [6]. In this study, most C. occultus-positive cattle (6/7) were post-weaned calves, heifers and adults from a single farm and fed with solid food placed on the ground of the farm, which increases the risk to be contaminated with rodent feces. In contrast, this species was not seen in suckling calves, which are mainly fed using milk feeders, and, consequently, all utensils used for that are more difficult to be contaminated with rodent feces.
Cryptosporidium xiaoi is considered one of the most common Cryptosporidium spp. in small ruminants, being responsible for over 90% of cryptosporidial infections in sheep and goats together with C. ubiquitum [61]. It has been suggested that both species are more likely to be found in healthy lambs, whereas C. parvum predominates in clinically ill lambs [63]. Reports of infections by C. xiaoi in cattle are limited worldwide, with sporadic infections being reported in Jordan and China [49,75]. In Ireland, some infections in cattle were identified as C. bovis/C. xiaoi [11], given the sequence similarity of both species at the SSU rRNA gene that makes accurate differentiation between both species in some cases difficult [76]. The finding of C. xiaoi may be related to cross-infections due to the traditional livestock farming system used in a number of Galician livestock farms, where cattle, sheep and goats share pastures and facilities [34,77]. Earlier studies in this geographical area have associated C. xiaoi with neonatal diarrheic outbreaks in goat farms in this geographical area [77,78], and it was also identified in asymptomatic sheep and goats [34].
Our results also have public health implications since some Cryptosporidium species detected in asymptomatic cattle have been previously identified in human samples. In this respect, the most frequent species identified, C. parvum, is considered the most important zoonotic species and, together with C. hominis, responsible for most of the human cryptosporidiosis outbreaks worldwide [2,3,18]. In addition, asymptomatic cattle from Galicia shed C. parvum oocysts belonging to subtypes IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA16G3R1, previously identified as the major C. parvum subtypes found in cryptosporidiosis outbreaks in calves from Spain [16,17]. Subtype IIaA15G2R1, considered one of the major C. parvum subtypes causing human cryptosporidiosis outbreaks worldwide [18], was predominant, whereas the latter seems to play a minor zoonotic role since it has been identified in a limited number of cattle and humans [16]. Cryptosporidium andersoni has been sporadically detected in humans and thus considered a species of minor public health significance [4,6]; nevertheless, it has been identified as the most common Cryptosporidium species in human patients from some regions of China [2]. In addition, C. bovis and C. occultus were also found in a limited number of human samples [2,55], although their pathogenicity for humans has not been described yet. Considering all these results, asymptomatic cattle, especially suckling calves under 1 month, could act as reservoirs and disseminators of some zoonotic Cryptosporidium species; thus, these animals could have a significant impact on public health. In fact, a previous investigation performed in the study area showed a strong predomination of C. hominis (65.4%) and IIa subtypes of C. parvum (30.0%) in human samples [79]. In addition, the identification of C. parvum and C. andersoni oocysts in river water samples from Galicia [80], as well as the finding of C. parvum in mussels not subjected to depuration from Galician estuaries [81], strengthens the importance of cattle as a potential source of environmental contamination with zoonotic Cryptosporidium oocysts. Thus, people in close contact with cattle should implement those suitable hygienic measures to avoid getting infected; cattle farmers should also apply measures to avoid oocyst dissemination in the environment.

5. Conclusions

Our results reveal that Cryptosporidium spp. are prevalent parasites in healthy cattle from north-western Spain, with the pathogenic and zoonotic species C. parvum being the most frequently identified species. Its finding in all age classes implies significant animal and public health concerns. Although healthy calves under 1 month are the major carriers of C. parvum, adult cattle may also play a role in the appearance of cryptosporidiosis outbreaks in calves and humans. The predominance of C. bovis in cattle older than 1 month supports the idea that the age-related pattern of Cryptosporidium species described in cattle is not fully consistent, and thus further studies are still needed to identify those factors determining the species distribution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D., G.F. and P.M.; methodology, P.D. and E.N.; investigation, P.D., E.N., S.R., D.G.-D., N.M.-C., A.P. and G.L.-L.; formal analysis, C.M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.D., E.N. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, P.D., G.F. and P.M.; project administration, P.D. and P.M.; funding acquisition, P.D.-B. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain), grant number AGL2016-76034-P and by Xunta de Galicia (Spain), grant number 2017-PG117.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures fully complied with ethics regulations in Spain (Royal Decree 53/2013, on the protection of animals against cruelty; www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2013/02/01/53).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Diego Fariñas, Pablo Béjar, María Soilán and Jose Enrique Gayol for their invaluable help in selecting the farms and collecting the samples. We also thank Joaquín Quílez (Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain) for a thoughtful and careful review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ryan, U.; Fayer, R.; Xiao, L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: Current understanding and research needs. Parasitology 2014, 141, 1667–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ryan, U.; Zahedi, A.; Paparini, A. Cryptosporidium in humans and animals-a one health approach to prophylaxis. Parasite Immunol. 2016, 38, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chalmers, R.M.; Katzer, F. Looking for Cryptosporidium: The application of advances in detection and diagnosis. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Šlapeta, J. Cryptosporidiosis and Cryptosporidium species in animals and humans: A thirty colour rainbow? Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 957–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, L.; Fayer, R. Molecular characterization of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1239–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santín, M. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in ruminants. Vet. Clin. N. Am.–Food A 2020, 36, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thompson, R.C.A.; Ash, A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 40, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Azami, M.; Moghaddam, D.D.; Salehi, R.; Salehi, M. The identification of Cryptosporidium species (protozoa) in Ifsahan, Iran by PCR-RFLP analysis of the 18S rRNA gene. Mol. Biol. (Mosk) 2007, 41, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, F.; Huang, K. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle from farms in China. J. Vet. Sci. 2012, 13, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ma, J.; Li, P.; Zhao, X.; Xu, H.; Wu, W.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle, beef cattle and water buffaloes in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mirhashemi, M.E.; Zintl, A.; Grant, T.; Lucy, F.; Mulcahy, G.; De Waal, T. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species in livestock in Ireland. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 216, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Santín, M.; Trout, J.M.; Fayer, R. A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis in dairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zahedi, A.; Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium—An update with an emphasis on foodborne and waterborne transmission. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 132, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, W.; Wang, R.; Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Cao, J.; Zhang, X.; Ling, H.; Liu, A.; Shen, Y. Distribution and genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned dairy calves in Northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shaw, H.J.; Innes, E.A.; Morrison, L.J.; Katzer, F.; Wells, B. Long-term production effects of clinical cryptosporidiosis in neonatal calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Díaz, P.; Quílez, J.; Chalmers, R.M.; Panadero, R.; López, C.; Sánchez-Acedo, C.; Morrondo, P.; Díez-Baños, P. Genotype and subtype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from calves and lambs in Galicia (NW Spain). Parasitology 2010, 137, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Quílez, J.; Torres, E.; Chalmers, R.M.; Robinson, G.; del Cacho, E.; Sánchez-Acedo, C. Cryptosporidium species and subtype analysis from dairy calves in Spain. Parasitology 2008, 135, 1613–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exp. Parasitol. 2010, 124, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fayer, R.; Santín, M.; Trout, J.M.; Greiner, E. Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 135, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fayer, R.; Santín, M.; Trout, J.M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in mature dairy cattle on farms in eastern United States compared with younger cattle from the same locations. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 145, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santín, M.; Trout, J.M.; Xiao, L.; Zhou, L.; Greiner, E.; Fayer, R. Prevalence and age-related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 122, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feltus, D.C.; Giddings, C.W.; Khaitsa, M.L.; McEvoy, J.M. High prevalence of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in calves compared to mature cows in beef cow-calf operations. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 151, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Smith, R.P.; Clifton-Hadley, F.A.; Cheney, T.; Giles, M. Prevalence and molecular typing of Cryptosporidium in dairy cattle in England and Wales and examination of potential on-farm transmission routes. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Chang, Y.; Yu, F.; Zhang, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Gansu, northwest China. Parasite 2020, 27, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Feng, Y.; Ortega, Y.; He, G.; Das, P.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Fayer, R.; Gatei, W.; Cama, V.; Xiao, L. Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 144, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qi, M.; Wang, H.; Jing, B.; Wang, D.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L. Occurrence and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves in Xinjiang, northwestern China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Almeida, A.; González-Warleta, M.; Correia Da Costa, J.M.; Mezo, M. Prevalence and preliminary genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. isolated from asymptomatic heifers in Galicia (NW Spain). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2006, 53 (Suppl. 1), 22–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Almeida, A.; González-Warleta, M.; Correia Da Costa, J.M.; Rumbo-Lorenzo, C.; Mezo, M. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis in healthy adult domestic ruminants. Parasitol. Res. 2007, 101, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; García-Presedo, I.; Almeida, A.; González-Warleta, M.; Correia Da Costa, J.M.; Mezo, M. Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in two areas of Galicia (NW Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2451–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. MAPA. Análisis Provincial del Número de Animales Según Tipos, 2018 (Noviembre). Anuario de Estadística 2018. 2020. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/publicaciones/anuario-de-estadistica/2018/default.aspx?parte=3&capitulo=08&grupo=1&seccion=2 (accessed on 31 August 2020).
  31. Consellería do Medio Rural. Estrutura por Tamaño de Explotación. In: Anuario de Estatística Agraria 2018. 2020. Available online: https://mediorural.xunta.gal/es/recursos/estadisticas/estadistica-agraria/2018 (accessed on 31 August 2020).
  32. Ireland-Perry, R.L.; Stallings, C.C. Fecal Consistency as Related to Dietary Composition in Lactating Holstein Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Carro-Corral, C.; González-Warleta, M.; Mezo, M. Prevalence and intensity of infection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Galicia (NW Spain). J. Vet. Med. B 2006, 53, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Díaz, P.; Navarro, E.; Prieto, A.; Pérez-Creo, A.; Viña, M.; Díaz-Cao, J.M.; López, C.M.; Panadero, R.; Fernández, G.; Díez-Baños, P.; et al. Cryptosporidium species in post-weaned and adult sheep and goats from N.W. Spain: Public and animal health significance. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 254, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, J.; Alderisio, K.A.; Xiao, L. Distribution of Cryptosporidium genotypes in storm event water samples from three watersheds in New York. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4446–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ng, J.; Pavlasek, I.; Ryan, U. Identification of novel Cryptosporidium genotypes from avian hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7548–7553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Alves, M.; Xiao, L.; Sulaiman, I.; Lal, A.A.; Matos, O.; Antunes, F. Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2744–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sulaiman, I.M.; Hira, P.R.; Zhou, L.; Al-Ali, F.M.; Al-Shelahi, F.A.; Shweiki, H.M.; Iqbal, J.; Khalid, N.; Xiao, L. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2805–2809. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Silva, F.M.; Lopes, R.S.; Araújo-Junior, J.P. Identification of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy cattle in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2013, 22, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Langkjaer, R.B.; Vigre, H.; Enemark, H.L.; Maddox-Hyttel, C. Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from pigs and cattle in Denmark. Parasitology 2007, 134, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amer, S.; Zidan, S.; Adamu, H.; Ye, J.; Roellig, D.; Xiao, L.; Feng, Y. Prevalence and characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Nile River delta provinces, Egypt. Exp. Parasitol. 2013, 135, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, S.M.; Debnath, C.; Pramanik, A.K.; Xiao, L.; Nozaki, T.; Ganguly, S. Molecular characterization and assessment of zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium from dairy cattle in West Bengal, India. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 171, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Manyazewal, A.; Francesca, S.; Pal, M.; Gezahegn, M.; Tesfaye, M.; Lucy, M.; Teklu, W.; Getachew, T. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in Addis Ababa and its environs, Ethiopia. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. 2018, 13, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Silverlås, C.; de Verdier, K.; Emanuelson, U.; Mattsson, J.G.; Björkman, C. Cryptosporidium infection in herds with and without calf diarrhoeal problems. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kváč, M.; Kouba, M.; Vítovec, J. Age-related and housing-dependence of Cryptosporidium infection of calves from dairy and beef herds in South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 137, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mendonça, C.; Almeida, A.; Castro, A.; de Lurdes Delgado, M.; Soares, S.; da Costa, J.M.; Canada, N. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from cattle from Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 147, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Coklin, T.; Farber, J.; Parrington, L.; Dixon, B. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Ontario, Canada. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 150, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thomson, S.; Hamilton, C.A.; Hope, J.C.; Katzer, F.; Mabbott, N.A.; Morrison, L.J.; Innes, E.A. Bovine cryptosporidiosis: Impact, host-parasite interaction and control strategies. Vet. Res. 2017, 48, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gong, C.; Cao, X.F.; Deng, L.; Li, W.; Huang, X.M.; Lan, J.C.; Xiao, Q.C.; Zhong, Z.J.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: A review. Parasite 2017, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ares-Mazás, M.E.; Fernández-da Ponte, B.; Vergara-Castiblanco, C.A.; Freire-Santos, F.; Quilez-Cinca, J.; Causape-Valenzuela, A.C.; Sánchez-Acedo, C. Oocysts, IgG levels and immunoblot patterns determined for Cryptosporidium parvum in bovine examined during a visit to a farm (northeastern Spain). Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 81, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murakoshi, F.; Xiao, L.; Matsubara, R.; Sato, R.; Kato, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Fukuda, Y.; Tada, C.; Nakai, Y. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in grazing beef cattle in Japan. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, A.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Shu, J.; Zhang, W.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; Ling, H. Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Heilongjiang Province, China. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ondrácková, Z.; Kvác, M.; Sak, B.; Kvetonová, D.; Rost, M. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in South Bohemia, the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 165, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, R.; Ma, G.; Zhao, J.; Lu, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Jian, F.; Ning, C.; Xiao, L. Cryptosporidium andersoni is the predominant species in post-weaned and adult dairy cattle in China. Parasitol. Int. 2011, 60, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kváč, M.; Vlnatá, G.; Ježková, J.; Horčičková, M.; Konečný, R.; Hlásková, L.; McEvoy, J.; Sak, B. Cryptosporidium occultus sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in rats. Eur. J. Protistol. 2018, 63, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abeywardena, H.; Jex, A.R.; Koehler, A.V.; Rajapakse, R.P.; Udayawarna, K.; Haydon, S.R.; Stevens, M.A.; Gasser, R.B. First molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from bovines (Bos taurus and Bubalus bubalis) in Sri Lanka: Unexpected absence of C. parvum from pre-weaned calves. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Nguyen, S.T.; Fukuda, Y.; Tada, C.; Sato, R.; Duong, B.; Nguyen, D.T.; Nakai, Y. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in native beef calves in central Vietnam. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 1817–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liang, N.; Wu, Y.; Sun, M.; Chang, Y.; Lin, X.; Yu, L.; Hu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, S.; Cui, Z.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province, South China. Parasitology 2019, 146, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sevá, A.D.P.; Funada, M.R.; Souza, S.D.O.; Nava, A.; Richtzenhain, L.J.; Soares, R.M. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. isolated from domestic animals in a rural area surrounding Atlantic dry forest fragments in Teodoro Sampaio municipality, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2010, 19, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; González-Losada, Y.A.; Mezo-Menéndez, M.; Ares-Mazas, E. A study of cryptosporidiosis in a cohort of neonatal calves. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 106, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Feng, Y.; Ryan, U.M.; Xiao, L. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018, 34, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Santín, M. Clinical and subclinical infections with Cryptosporidium in animals. N. Z. Vet. J. 2013, 61, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Meireles, M.V.; de Oliveira, F.P.; Teixeira, W.F.; Coelho, W.M.; Mendes, L.C. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves from the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 109, 949–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yildirim, A.; Adanir, R.; Inci, A.; Yukari, B.A.; Duzlu, O.; Onder, Z.; Ciloglu, A.; Simsek, E. Prevalence and genotyping of bovine Cryptosporidium species in the Mediterranean and Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 69, 101425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Silverlås, C.; Blanco-Penedo, I. Cryptosporidium spp. in calves and cows from organic and conventional dairy herds. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Fan, Y.; Wang, T.; Koehler, A.V.; Hu, M.; Gasser, R.B. Molecular investigation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in pre- and post-weaned calves in Hubei Province, China. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Åberg, M.; Emanuelson, U.; Troell, K.; Björkman, C. Infection dynamics of Cryptosporidium bovis and Cryptosporidium ryanae in a Swedish dairy herd. Vet. Parasitol. X 2019, 1, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rieux, A.; Paraud, C.; Pors, I.; Chartier, C. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from beef calves under one month of age over three successive years in one herd in western France. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 202, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Åberg, M.; Emanuelson, U.; Troell, K.; Björkman, C. A single-cohort study of Cryptosporidium bovis and Cryptosporidium ryanae in dairy cattle from birth to calving. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2020, 20, 100400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wegayehu, T.; Karim, R.; Anberber, M.; Adamu, H.; Erko, B.; Zhang, L.; Tilahun, G. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium species in dairy calves in Central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Maikai, B.V.; Umoh, J.U.; Kwaga, J.K.P.; Lawal, I.A.; Maikai, V.A.; Cama, V.; Xiao, L. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in native breeds of cattle in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 178, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, W.; Zhou, H.; Huang, Y.; Xu, L.; Rao, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, W.; Yi, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wu, Y.; et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild rats (Rattus spp.) from the Hainan Province, China: Molecular detection, species/genotype identification and implications for public health. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 9, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, F.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, J.; Kváč, M.; Guo, Y.; Li, N.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Common occurrence of divergent Cryptosporidium species and Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes in farmed bamboo rats (Rhizomys sinensis). Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xu, N.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Yin, J.; Yuan, Z.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J. First report of Cryptosporidium viatorum and Cryptosporidium occultus in humans in China, and of the unique novel C. viatorum subtype XVaA3h. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Hijjawi, N.; Mukbel, R.; Yan, R.; Ryan, U. Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in animal and human isolates from Jordan. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 228, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Fayer, R.; Santín, M. Cryptosporidium xiaoi n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in sheep (Ovis aries). Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 164, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Díaz, P.; Quílez, J.; Prieto, A.; Navarro, E.; Pérez-Creo, A.; Fernández, G.; Panadero, R.; López, C.; Díez-Baños, P.; Morrondo, P. Cryptosporidium species and subtype analysis in diarrhoeic pre-weaned lambs and goat kids from north-western Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 4099–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Díaz, P.; Quílez, J.; Robinson, G.; Chalmers, R.M.; Díez-Baños, P.; Morrondo, P. Identification of Cryptosporidium xiaoi in diarrhoeic goat kids (Capra hircus) in Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 172, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abal-Fabeiro, J.L.; Maside, X.; Llovo, J.; Bartolomé, C. Aetiology and epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis cases in Galicia (NW Spain), 2000–2008. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 3022–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Castro-Hermida, J.A.; García-Presedo, I.; Almeida, A.; González-Warleta, M.; Da Costa, J.M.; Mezo, M. Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in surface water: A health risk for humans and animals. Water Res. 2009, 43, 4133–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gómez-Couso, H.; Méndez-Hermida, F.; Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Ares-Mazás, E. Cryptosporidium contamination in harvesting areas of bivalve molluscs. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and percentage of identification of Cryptosporidium species detected in healthy cattle from Galicia when the age of the animals was considered.
Figure 1. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. and percentage of identification of Cryptosporidium species detected in healthy cattle from Galicia when the age of the animals was considered.
Animals 11 00256 g001
Table 1. Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes identified in cattle from Galicia (north-western Spain) when the age of the animals was considered.
Table 1. Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes identified in cattle from Galicia (north-western Spain) when the age of the animals was considered.
Age Class (Months)Number of C. parvum PositivesIIaA15G2R1
n (%)
IIaA16G3R1
n (%)
Not Identified
n (%)
G-1 (0–1)2618 (69.2)2 (7.7)6 (23.1)
G-2 (1–2)64 (66.7)1 (16.7)1 (16.7)
G-3 (2–12)10 (0)1 (100)0 (0)
G-4 (12–24)21 (50)0 (0)1 (50)
G-5 (>24)73 (42.9)0 (0)4 (57.1)
Total4226 (61.9)4 (9.5)12 (28.6)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díaz, P.; Navarro, E.; Remesar, S.; García-Dios, D.; Martínez-Calabuig, N.; Prieto, A.; López-Lorenzo, G.; López, C.M.; Panadero, R.; Fernández, G.; et al. The Age-Related Cryptosporidium Species Distribution in Asymptomatic Cattle from North-Western Spain. Animals 2021, 11, 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020256

AMA Style

Díaz P, Navarro E, Remesar S, García-Dios D, Martínez-Calabuig N, Prieto A, López-Lorenzo G, López CM, Panadero R, Fernández G, et al. The Age-Related Cryptosporidium Species Distribution in Asymptomatic Cattle from North-Western Spain. Animals. 2021; 11(2):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díaz, Pablo, Esther Navarro, Susana Remesar, David García-Dios, Néstor Martínez-Calabuig, Alberto Prieto, Gonzalo López-Lorenzo, Ceferino Manuel López, Rosario Panadero, Gonzalo Fernández, and et al. 2021. "The Age-Related Cryptosporidium Species Distribution in Asymptomatic Cattle from North-Western Spain" Animals 11, no. 2: 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop