Next Article in Journal
Polyionic Tags as Enhancers of Protein Solubility in Recombinant Protein Expression
Next Article in Special Issue
Phoma Infections: Classification, Potential Food Sources, and Their Clinical Impact
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Risk Mitigation for Immunocompromised Consumers of Mucormycete Spoiled and Fermented Foods: Germane Guidance and Remaining Needs

Microorganisms 2018, 6(2), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020046

Review
The Genus Wallemia—From Contamination of Food to Health Threat
1
National Institute of Biology, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Biology Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 April 2018 / Accepted: 18 May 2018 / Published: 21 May 2018

Abstract

:
The fungal genus Wallemia of the order Wallemiales (Wallemiomycotina, Basidiomycota) comprises the most xerotolerant, xerophilic and also halophilic species worldwide. Wallemia spp. are found in various osmotically challenged environments, such as dry, salted, or highly sugared foods, dry feed, hypersaline waters of solar salterns, salt crystals, indoor and outdoor air, and agriculture aerosols. Recently, eight species were recognized for the genus Wallemia, among which four are commonly associated with foods: W. sebi, W. mellicola, W. muriae and W. ichthyophaga. To date, only strains of W. sebi, W. mellicola and W. muriae have been reported to be related to human health problems, as either allergological conditions (e.g., farmer’s lung disease) or rare subcutaneous/cutaneous infections. Therefore, this allergological and infective potential, together with the toxins that the majority of Wallemia spp. produce even under saline conditions, defines these fungi as filamentous food-borne pathogenic fungi.
Keywords:
Wallemia; food; air; pathogen; xerophile; halophile; mycotoxin; farmer’s lung disease; subcutaneous infection

1. Introduction

Low availability of water is one of the most life-limiting factors, and only specially adapted organisms can cope with such stress in their environment. For this reason, reduced water through drying or solute addition (e.g., salt, sugar) has been used for millennia for the conservation of food. Indeed, with water availability measured as water activity (aw) < 0.9, growth of the majority of bacterial pathogens is prevented [1]. However, many fungi can still thrive at much lower aw (~0.8), and some even define the lowest aw that has been seen to support life (0.61) [2,3]. These fungi are in general referred to as xerophilic, or more accurately, osmophilic, if they can grow in solutions with high solute concentrations, such as high sugars or salts. Those that grow under high salt are also known as halotolerant and halophilic if the main solute is NaCl, or chaotolerant and chaophilic if a chaotropic salt such as MgCl2 prevails [4]. Although xerophily and halophily are rare in the phylum Basidiomycota, the Wallemia spp. represent one of the most xerophilic fungal taxa, and include the most xerophilic, osmophilic, and even halophilic and chaophilic microorganisms described to date [5,6,7]. The ecology of these fungi is in line with their xerophilic character, whereby the majority of habitats from which strains of Wallemia spp. have been isolated are osmotically challenging, as either extremely dry and saline environments, and/or highly salted or sugared foods [5,6,7,8,9].
The extremophilic nature of Wallemia spp. is also illustrated by the initial description of these fungi when they were found along the Atlantic coast of Norway, as reported back in the year 1887 [10]. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the majority of the fish caught along this coast was cod (Gadus spp.), sold as klipfish. This was preserved with plenty of salt, and left to dry on the rocks beneath the cliffs, to also provide food for consumption outside the hunting season [10]. However, this conservation method did not prevent the growth of all microorganisms as regular spoilage occurred. A fish inspector named Mr. Wallem first tackled this problem at the end of the 19th century by taking samples of the contaminated fish to established Scandinavian scientists of the time, to try to discover what caused this spoilage [11]. The mycologist Johan Olav Olsen described the fungal contaminant as Wallemia ichthyophaga (Johan-Olsen, 1887), which was thus named after the fish inspector and indicated its ecological niche as “ichthyophaga”, literally meaning “eating fish” [10]. Unfortunately, none of the original material was preserved, and the neotype is now based on the strain isolated from the extremely saline waters of the Sečovlje solar salterns (Slovenia). Recently, strains of W. ichythophaga were again isolated from this original source of klipfish, with obvious fungal growth collected in Nordland, Lofoten (Norway) [12].
Strains of Wallemia spp. were later isolated not only from salted cod, but also from all sorts of sweet, salted and dried foods, as well as from the atmospheric air and from the hypersaline waters of solar salterns [5]. Indeed, Wallemia spp. are now considered to be important spoilage organisms for foods with low aw [3,9]. However, these fungi of the genus Wallemia might not only result in economic losses due to food spoilage, as they might also represent a largely overlooked health risk. This is due to their production of mycotoxins that have both known and yet-to-be defined effects on human and animal health if they are consumed as part of contaminated foods and feed. These mycotoxins can cause the allergological problem known as “farmer’s lung disease”, and can also promote infections in immunocompetent humans [13].
This review focuses on the latest contributions to the phylogenetic resolution, ecophysiology, and pathogenic and mycotoxigenic potential of strains of the genus Wallemia.

2. The Phylogenetic Enigma of the Genus Wallemia

The long-lasting phylogenetic and taxonomic obscurity of the genus Wallemia was resolved in several studies that combined the old taxonomic literature and modern concepts based on molecular data [5,14,15]. The first comprehensive study here resolved the new class of Wallemiomycetes and order of Wallemiales into the phylum Basidiomycota, based on their unique type of conidiogenesis and their extreme xerotolerance [5]. Their phylogenetic position was supported by additional molecular analyses that described the class Wallemiomycetes as an early diverging basidiomycetous lineage with a basal position near the Entorrhizomycetidae, and possibly as a sister group to the Agaricomycotina and Ustilaginomycotina [14]. They are closely related to Agaricomycotina [16], as additionally confirmed in recent phylogenomic studies based on a 71-protein dataset [17] and on the whole proteomes [18]. These analyses support Ustilaginomycotina as a sister group to the branch that unites Wallemiomycetes and the remaining Agaricomycotina, and Pucciniomycotina as a sister group to the rest of the Basidiomycota [17,18]. Most recently, the evolutionary history of the genus Wallemia was resolved by its allocation to the newly distinguished sub-phylum Wallemiomycotina that split away approximately 487 million years ago [15]. In this way, the distinctiveness and uniqueness of the genus Wallemia was emphasised almost to the highest taxonomic rank.
Long after the initial definition of the single species of W. ichthyophaga in the genus Wallemia [19], two additional species were described: W. sebi and W. muriae. These were based on the differences in sequence data of the internally transcribed spacer region of their rDNA, and on their conidial size and xerotolerance [5]. Later on, a multi-locus phylogenetic approach resolved four new species [8]: W. mellicola, W. canadensis, W. tropicalis (closely related to W. sebi) and W. hederae (phylogenetic sister of W. ichthyophaga). Recently, another new species was added to the genus: W. peruviensis, which is closely related to W. hederae and was isolated from an agricultural setting in Peru [20].
The Wallemia spp. differ in size of conidia, xerotolerance, halotolerance (i.e., tolerance to NaCl), chaotolerance (i.e., tolerance to MgCl2), growth temperature range, extracellular enzyme profile, and secondary metabolite production [6,8].
The dichotomous keys on the basis of macromorphological, micromorphological and physiological characteristics of the species of the genus Wallemia recognised to date are available in Jančič et al. (2015) [8] and Diaz-Valderrama et al. (2017) [20].

3. The Most Xerophilic Fungal Genus Known to Date

Wallemia sebi is the most-studied species among the Wallemia, and is one of the most xerophilic fungi found worldwide, which is due to its dissemination through the atmospheric air and its colonization of diverse substrates with low aw, and it is common on various types of foods (see Table 1). Its optimal aw for growth is 0.97–0.92, and it has an extremely halotolerant and chaotolerant character, with optimal growth at 4% to 12% (w/v) NaCl, and 4% to 6% MgCl2. W. sebi can, however, also grow at up to 28% NaCl and 17% MgCl2 [8].
Compared to W. sebi, the phylogenetically close relative W. mellicola differs in terms of its larger size of conidia and lower halotolerance and chaotolerance. Growth of W. mellicola is still supported to the maximal concentrations of 24% NaCl and 13% MgCl2. Also, it has a worldwide distribution and can be isolated from different habitats, including soil, air and house dust, hypersaline water of solar salterns, salted, sugared and dried food products, seeds, straw, pollen and forest plants (see Table 1 for details).
Unlike the above (xerotolerant) species, W. muriae and W. ichthyophaga have the obligatory demand for lowered aw in their habitats as they only grow on media supplemented with additional solutes like salts and sugars. The growth range of W. ichthyophaga is 9% to 30% NaCl [7], whereas W. muriae thrives in media supplemented with 4% to 25% NaCl [21] and tolerates up to 14% MgCl2 [6]. W. ichthyophaga is the most halophilic fungus described to date, with a growth optimum between 15% and 20% NaCl [7,22]. Furthermore, strains of W. ichthyophaga can also tolerate the highest concentrations of MgCl2 that still support active life (up to 20% MgCl2) [4].
Also the phylogenetic sister of W. ichthyophaga, W. hederae is clearly halophilic, with a growth optimum of 12% to 20% NaCl. However, it has no obligatory demand for lowered aw, as it can also grow, albeit poorly, on media without extra solutes [6]. W. hederae is distinctive from its relatives by large amounts of exudate formed in cultures that are composed of enzymes and secondary metabolites [6]. The ecological occurrence of W. ichthyophaga is in agreement with its halophilic behaviour, as it is strictly limited to extremely saline habitats like the hypersaline waters of salterns, salt crystals and salted meat and fish. In contrast, to date, W. hederae has only been isolated from non-saline substrates, like oak honey, barley seeds, hay and ivy pollen [6]. W. muriae is a common food contaminant of sugared and salted food products, and is found in the natural habitats of hypersaline waters of salterns world-wide [5].
Wallemia canadensis is clearly distinguished from W. sebi by its lower temperature range for growth (optimal growth temperature, 24 °C; compared to other related species as 30 °C), and lower halotolerance (NaCl, 0–24%) and chaotolerance (MgCl2, 0–11%). The ecology of W. canadensis appears to be limited to temperate and cold environments, where it has been isolated from house dust and soil. On the contrary, the other species in close phylogenetic proximity to W. sebi, W. tropicalis, appears to be limited to soils and air in subtropical climates [8]. Finally, W. peruviensis was originally defined from a restricted geographical location, as from air of an agricultural setting in Peru, and it is closely related to W. hederae. It is also halotolerant, with growth up to 17% NaCl, and chaotolerant, as it can tolerate up to 16% MgCl2; W. peruviensis produces less exudates compared to W. hederae [20].
Among the eight Wallemia spp., W. sebi, W. mellicola, W. muriae and W. ichthyophaga, have been commonly associated with food habitats, while the rarely encountered W. hederae has been linked to oak honey. There are only few recent (after the year 2014) publications on Wallemia spp. associated with food: a case report on contamination of maple syrup [23] and wheat grains [24], being a dominant fungus on stored green coffee beans [25] and found also on edible insects (crickets and locusts) [26]. Other recent publications [6,8,9,23] mostly reclassify previously isolated Wallemia sebi from various habitats including foods into newly described species, for instance, as W. mellicola and W. muriae (see Table 1).

4. Potential Health Risks of the Bioactive Metabolites of Wallemia spp.

Secondary metabolites [29,30,31] do not only have crucial roles in interactions with other organisms, as they can also be involved in nutrition, sporulation and even stress tolerance [32]. The diversity of the bioactive metabolites identified in the extremotolerant/extremophilic fungi studied to date is relatively low. Interestingly, an in-silico analysis of the genomic data of W. mellicola (previously known as W. sebi [33]) and W. ichthyophaga revealed only a few secondary metabolite clusters, whereas wet laboratory data have indicated a considerable number of secondary metabolites that can be synthesized under different conditions [27].
The knowledge of the mycotoxigenic repertoire of Wallemia spp. was until recently limited only to W. sebi. W. sebi was reported to produce a number of bioactive metabolites/toxins, which include the tricyclic dihydroxysesquiterpenes wallimidione, walleminone and walleminol (walleminol A), and the azasteroids UCA 1064-A and 1064-B (reviewed in [27,34]). Among these, walleminol is the only one of these metabolites to be detected in food to date, in samples of jam and cake shown to be contaminated with W. sebi. Walleminol is toxic to brine shrimp and the protozoa Tetrahymena pyriformis. No toxic effects are known for UCA 1064-A and 1064-B. In contrast, they have shown antitumor, antiproliferative and antimicrobial activity [35]. There are only a few reports on secondary metabolite production under saline growth conditions [35,36,37,38].
A recent comprehensive investigation was carried out into the secondary metabolites produced by seven of the species of the genus Wallemia (i.e., W. sebi, W. muriae, W. mellicola, W. tropicali, W. canadensis, W. hederae, W. ichtyhophaga) under osmotically unstressed and stressed conditions [27]. This identified a mixture of toxic metabolites that included walleminol, walleminone and wallimidione, and contrary to common belief, their production was increased in response to increased concentrations of NaCl [27]. This behaviour makes Wallemia spp. an important mycotoxigenic contaminant of salt-preserved foods, and this bioactive potential of Wallemia spp. might thus have serious undesirable effects on human health. Further studies on the toxicities of these bioactive metabolites in vertebrates are needed to better define these effects, and at present, the contamination of salted food with Wallemia spp. should be considered with caution in terms of food quality control [27].

5. Infectious and Allergological Cases Linked to Wallemia spp.

It is now becoming clearer that extremophilic fungi can present a threat to human health through their stress-tolerance mechanisms that appear designed to promote their pathogenicity. Indeed, the link between extremophilic lifestyle and pathogenicity is seen in several species of pathogenic fungi that have extremotolerant/extremophilic close relatives [29].
Little information is available on the pathogenicity of Wallemia spp. and the associated clinical features, potentially because these infections rarely occur, or because they have remained under-diagnosed. Indeed, Wallemia spp. are slow growing, and they require media supplemented with high amounts of salts to promote their competitive advantage against other fungi. Therefore, Wallemia isolates can be easily overgrown by other moderate xerophilic fungi, or simply overlooked because of short cultivation times. This also appears to be the reason why there are relatively few Wallemia strains deposited in culture collections, albeit they show a ubiquitous and world-wide distribution.
Evidence of the involvement of Wallemia spp. in human infections and pathogenesis has so far been limited to only W. sebi, which was until 2005 the only known species of this genus [5]. Only three reports of cutaneous and subcutaneous infections have been linked to Wallemia spp. The first two of these did not indicate any clinical features, and were reported in 1909 and 1950 as ‘hemisporiosis’, after the synonymous species Hemispora stellata. The third occurrence was reported in 2008, as a case of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in a 43-year-old woman from northern India who was otherwise healthy and immunocompetent. She suffered from a non-healing ulcer on the dorsum of a foot that started as an itchy papule, although with no prior injury. Over 8 months this gradually developed into an erythematous lesion. Diagnosis and pathogen identification was based on histological demonstration of septate hyphae and recovery of the fungus in cultures [13]. Subsequent phylogenetic analysis reclassified this pathogenic W. sebi strain to the species W. mellicola [8]. However, it is important to note that it is only rarely that pathogenic fungi cause infections in immunocompetent individuals. Thus, this this case report should be considered as a warning sign of the pathogenic potential of Wallemia spp. However, there are no recent (after the year 2014) clinical reports linked to Wallemia spp. as the causative agent of infection.
However, Wallemia spp. are important human allergens, as they can produce masses of tiny propagules that are ideal for aerial dispersal, and can thus enter into the lungs of hosts. Cell size is an important factor for effective invasion and for establishing an infection in the pulmonary system [29]. The conidia of Wallemia spp. are very small, with a range from 1.5 µm to 3.0 µm [8], and they thus fulfill this criterion. Another important character that allows the spores to escape inflammatory immune responses and to successfully colonize the lungs is the presence of layers of hydrophobins [39], which are small cell-wall proteins with amphipathic properties that cover the antigens of the fungal cells [40]. Indeed, genome analysis of W. mellicola (previously designated as W. sebi) and W. ichythophaga uncovered an enrichment of genes that encoded these hydrophobins [18], which might contribute to their pathogenic and allergenic potentials.
Another important view of the involvement of fungi in the regulation of immune responses was recently highlighted [41]. Evidence has been provided that the “healthy” fungal community in the gut has an important role in the function of the immune system, and that prolonged antifungal treatments can increase the severity of colitis, and can also worsen the development of allergic airway disease, mainly because of the changes to the fungal community. Wallemia spp. was reported also as a member of fungal microbiota in human gut [42]. Prolonged antifungal therapies have been shown to reduce the levels of Candida spp. and to increase the proportions of fungal species that are otherwise absent or only present at low levels in healthy untreated mice, such as Wallemia spp. (together with Aspergillus spp. and Epicoccum spp.). When these mice were fed with a mixture of three such fungi, as A. amstelodami, E. nigrum and W. sebi, the effects of the exacerbated features of allergic airway disease were seen to be similar to those seen after antifungal treatment [41,42].
Chronic inhalation of spores and conidia from mouldy hay, straw or grain might therefore cause the bronchial asthma [43,44] or hypersensitivity pneumonitis (i.e., extrinsic allergic alveolitis) that is known as farmer’s lung disease, and that can be combined with pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema [45]. The symptoms can include dyspnoea, cough, tiredness, headaches and occasional fever/night sweats, and these depend on the severity of the farmer’s lung disease [46,47,48,49,50]. Numerous studies have revealed high concentrations of Wallemia spp. in air and dust in outdoor and indoor environments, as well as in the air of agricultural environments [6,20,51,52]. Indeed, for the air in stables and hay barns in Slovenia and Denmark, propagules of Wallemia spp. reached the highest recorded levels of 500 to 106 colony forming units (CFU)/m3, compared to the 20 to 500 CFU/m3 reported for residential buildings [6]. W. sebi has frequently been reported to be the cause of this respiratory allergy and of atopic diseases of asthmatic individuals [53,54]. However, the dominant species among Wallemia spp. in human environments in central Europe has been reported to be W. muriae [6], and not W. sebi, as was previously reported. For this reason, W. muriae can be considered as the primary causative agent of farmer’s lung disease and other allergological problems [6].

6. Final Remarks

To date, only three species from the genus Wallemia have been involved in human health issues: W. sebi, W. mellicola and W. muriae. These include allergological diseases such as farmer’s lung disease, and even, albeit rarely, some subcutaneous and cutaneous infections. The case of the subcutaneous infection due to W. mellicola (initially determined as W. sebi) is especially intriguing, because it occurred on an immunocompetent patient with no prior injury around the phaeohyphycosis that developed. Recently, it was also suggested that due to the high aerial abundance of W. muriae, this should be considered as the causative agent of farmer’s lung disease. The indications are thus that infections with Wallemia spp. can have serious effects on human health, not only via inhalation, but also via the consumption of contaminated food. It has already been shown in mice that over-representation of Wallemia spp. in the gut contributes to increased severity of asthmatic bronchial diseases and colitis. In addition, many Wallemia spp. can produce a rich repertoire of secondary metabolites that includes mycotoxins, especially when they thrive under high saline conditions. All of these are important aspects related to potential health risks that need to be considered when assessing the quality and safety of food preserved with salt and contaminated with Wallemia spp.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the state budget of the Slovenian Research Agency (Research Programme P1-0170, Infrastructural Centre Mycosmo, MRIC UL, Postdoctoral Project Z7-7436 to J. Zajc). The authors would like to thank Chris Berrie for language editing assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brewer, M.S. Traditional preservatives—Sodium chloride. In Encylopaedia of Food Microbiology; Robinson, R.K., Blatt, C.A., Patel, P.D., Eds.; Acamedic: London, UK, 1999; Volume 3, pp. 1723–1728. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leong, S.-L.L.; Pettersson, O.V.; Rice, T.; Hocking, A.D.; Schnürer, J. The extreme xerophilic mould Xeromyces bisporus—Growth and competition at various water activities. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pitt, J.I.; Hocking, A.D. Fungi and Food Spoilage, 3rd ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zajc, J.; Dzeroski, S.; Kocev, D.; Oren, A.; Sonjak, S.; Tkavc, R.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Chaophilic or chaotolerant fungi: A new category of extremophiles? Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zalar, P.; de Hoog, G.S.; Schroers, H.J.; Frank, J.M.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the xerophilic genus Wallemia (Wallemiomycetes and Wallemiales, cl. et ord. nov.). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2005, 87, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jančič, S.; Zalar, P.; Kocev, D.; Schroers, H.-J.; Džeroski, S.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Halophily reloaded: New insights into the extremophilic life-style of Wallemia with the description of Wallemia hederae sp. nov. Fungal Divers. 2016, 76, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zajc, J.; Kogej, T.; Ramos, J.; Galinski, E.A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. The osmoadaptation strategy of the most halophilic fungus Wallemia ichthyophaga, growing optimally at salinities above 15% NaCl. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jančič, S.; Nguyen, H.D.T.; Frisvad, J.C.; Zalar, P.; Schroers, H.-J.; Seifert, K.A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. A taxonomic revision of the Wallemia sebi species complex. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Paterson, R.R.M.; Lima, N. Filamentous Fungal Human Pathogens from Food Emphasising Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucor. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Johan-Olsen, O. Om Sop på Klipfisk den Såkaldte Mid; Dybwad: Christiania, Norway, 1887. [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsson, K.-H.; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Zalar, P.; University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Personal communication, 2015.
  12. Gunde-Cimerman, N.; University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Zajc, J.; National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Personal communication, 2017.
  13. Guarro, J.; Gugnani, H.C.; Sood, N.; Batra, R.; Mayayo, E.; Gene, J.; Kakkar, S. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Wallemia sebi in an immunocompetent host. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1129–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matheny, P.B.; Gossmann, J.A.; Zalar, P.; Kumar, T.K.A.; Hibbett, D.S. Resolving the phylogenetic position of the Wallemiomycetes: An enigmatic major lineage of Basidiomycota. Can. J. Bot./Rev. Can. Bot. 2006, 84, 1794–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, R.-L.; Li, G.-J.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; Stata, M.; Yang, Z.-L.; Wu, G.; Dai, Y.-C.; He, S.-H.; Cui, B.-K.; Zhou, J.-L.; et al. A six-gene phylogenetic overview of Basidiomycota and allied phyla with estimated divergence times of higher taxa and a phyloproteomics perspective. Fungal Divers. 2017, 84, 43–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hibbett, D.S. A phylogenetic overview of the Agaricomycotina. Mycologia 2006, 98, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Padamsee, M.; Kumar, T.K.; Riley, R.; Binder, M.; Boyd, A.; Calvo, A.M.; Furukawa, K.; Hesse, C.; Hohmann, S.; James, T.Y.; et al. The genome of the xerotolerant mold Wallemia sebi reveals adaptations to osmotic stress and suggests cryptic sexual reproduction. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zajc, J.; Liu, Y.; Dai, W.; Yang, Z.; Hu, J.; Gostinčar, C.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Genome and transcriptome sequencing of the halophilic fungus Wallemia ichthyophaga: Haloadaptations present and absent. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Arx, J.A.V. The Genera of Fungi Sporulating in Pure Culture; With 134 fig., Ill. More than 300 Fungi; Cramer: Lehre, Germany, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  20. Díaz-Valderrama, J.R.; Nguyen, H.D.T.; Aime, M.C. Wallemia peruviensis sp. nov., a new xerophilic fungus from an agricultural setting in South America. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kralj Kunčič, M.; Kogej, T.; Drobne, D.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Morphological response of the halophilic fungal genus Wallemia to high salinity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kralj Kunčič, M.; Zajc, J.; Drobne, D.; Pipan Tkalec, Z.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Morphological responses to high sugar concentrations differ from adaptation to high salt concentrations in the xerophilic fungi Wallemia spp. Fungal Biol. 2013, 117, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Frasz, S.L.; Miller, J.D. Fungi in Ontario maple syrup & some factors that determine the presence of mold damage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 207, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yuan, Q.S.; Yang, P.; Wu, A.B.; Zuo, D.Y.; He, W.J.; Guo, M.W.; Huang, T.; Li, H.P.; Liao, Y.C. Variation in the Microbiome, Trichothecenes, and Aflatoxins in Stored Wheat Grains in Wuhan, China. Toxins (Basel) 2018, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Broissin-Vargas, L.M.; Snell-Castro, R.; Godon, J.J.; Gonzalez-Rios, O.; Suarez-Quiroz, M.L. Impact of storage conditions on fungal community composition of green coffee beans Coffea arabica L. stored in jute sacks during 1 year. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Osimani, A.; Garofalo, C.; Milanovic, V.; Taccari, M.; Cardinali, F.; Aquilanti, L.; Pasquini, M.; Mozzon, M.; Raffaelli, N.; Ruschioni, S.; et al. Insight into the proximate composition and microbial diversity of edible insects marketed in the European Union. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1157–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jančič, S.; Frisvad, J.C.; Kocev, D.; Gostinčar, C.; Džeroski, S.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Production of secondary metabolites in extreme environments: Food- and airborne Wallemia spp. produce toxic metabolites at hypersaline conditions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0169116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nguyen, H.D.T.; Jančič, S.; Meijer, M.; Tanney, J.B.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Seifert, K.A. Application of the phylogenetic species concept to Wallemia sebi from house dust and indoor air revealed by multi-locus genealogical concordance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. De Hoog, G.S.; Zalar, P.; van den Ende, B.G.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Relation of halotolerance to human pathogenicity in the fungal tree of life: An overview of ecology and evolution under stress. In Adaptation to Life at High Salt-Concentration in Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya; Gunde-Cimerman, N., Oren, A., Plemenitas, A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 373–395. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sonjak, S.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Comparison of secondary metabolite production by Penicillium crustosum strains, isolated from Arctic and other various ecological niches. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 53, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Frisvad, J. Halotolerant and halophilic fungi and their extrolite production. In Adaptation to Life at High Salt Concentrations in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology; Gunde-Cimerman, N., Oren, A., Plemenitaš, A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 425–439. [Google Scholar]
  32. Frisvad, J.C.; Smedsgaard, J.; Larsen, T.O.; Samson, R.A. Mycotoxins, drugs and other extrolites produced by species in Penicillium subgenus Penicillium. Stud. Mycol. 2004, 49, 201–241. [Google Scholar]
  33. Leong, S.L.; Lantz, H.; Pettersson, O.V.; Frisvad, J.C.; Thrane, U.; Heipieper, H.J.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Grabherr, M.; Pettersson, M.; Tellgren-Roth, C.; et al. Genome and physiology of the ascomycete filamentous fungus Xeromyces bisporus, the most xerophilic organism isolated to date. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 496–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  34. Zajc, J.; Jančič, S.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Wallemia. In Molecular Biology of Food and Water Borne Mycotoxigenic and Mycotic Fungi of Humans; Paterson, R.R.M., Lima, N., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 569–581. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wood, G.M.; Mann, P.J.; Lewis, D.F.; Reid, W.J.; Moss, M.O. Studies on a toxic metabolite from the mold Wallemia. Food Addit. Contam. 1990, 7, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Peng, X.P.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.P.; Hong, K.; Chen, H.; Yin, X.; Zhu, W.M. Aromatic compounds from the halotolerant fungal strain of Wallemia sebi PXP-89 in a hypersaline medium. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011, 34, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sepčić, K.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Low water activity induces the production of bioactive metabolites in halophilic and halotolerant fungi. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Botić, T.; Kunčič, M.K.; Sepčić, K.; Knez, Z.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Salt induces biosynthesis of hemolytically active compounds in the xerotolerant food-borne fungus Wallemia sebi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 326, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Aimanianda, V.; Bayry, J.; Bozza, S.; Kniemeyer, O.; Perruccio, K.; Elluru, S.R.; Clavaud, C.; Paris, S.; Brakhage, A.A.; Kaveri, S.V.; et al. Surface hydrophobin prevents immune recognition of airborne fungal spores. Nature 2009, 460, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Linder, M.B.; Szilvay, G.R.; Nakari-Setala, T.; Penttila, M.E. Hydrophobins: The protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 877–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wheeler, M.L.; Limon, J.J.; Bar, A.S.; Leal, C.A.; Gargus, M.; Tang, J.; Brown, J.; Funari, V.A.; Wang, H.L.; Crother, T.R.; et al. Immunological Consequences of Intestinal Fungal Dysbiosis. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Paterson, M.J.; Oh, S.; Underhill, D.M. Host-microbe interactions: Commensal fungi in the gut. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 40, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hanhela, R.; Louhelainen, K.; Pasanen, A.L. Prevalence of Microfungi in Finnish Cow Barns and Some Aspects of the Occurrence of Wallemia-Sebi and Fusaria. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1995, 21, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lappalainen, S.; Pasanen, A.L.; Reiman, M.; Kalliokoski, P. Serum IgG antibodies against Wallemia sebi and Fusarium species in Finnish farmers. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998, 81, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Soumagne, T.; Pana-Katatali, H.; Degano, B.; Dalphin, J.C. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Reboux, G.; Piarroux, R.; Mauny, F.; Madroszyk, A.; Millon, L.; Bardonnet, K.; Dalphin, J.C. Role of molds in farmer’s lung disease in Eastern France. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 163, 1534–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roussel, S.; Reboux, G.; Dalphin, J.C.; Laplante, J.J.; Piarroux, R. Evaluation of salting as a hay preservative against farmer’s lung disease agents. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2005, 12, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Roussel, S.; Reboux, G.; Dalphin, J.C.; Pernet, D.; Laplante, J.J.; Millon, L.; Piarroux, R. Farmer’s lung disease and microbiological composition of hay: A case-control study. Mycopathologia 2005, 160, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Roussel, S.; Reboux, G.; Dalphin, J.C.; Bardonnet, K.; Millon, L.; Piarroux, R. Microbiological evolution of hay and relapse in patients with farmer’s lung. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004, 61, e3. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Gbaguidi-Haore, H.; Roussel, S.; Reboux, G.; Dalphin, J.C.; Piarroux, R. Multilevel analysis of the impact of environmental factors and agricultural practices on the concentration in hay of microorganisms responsible for farmer’s lung disease. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2009, 16, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Kristiansen, A.; Saunders, A.M.; Hansen, A.A.; Nielsen, P.H.; Nielsen, J.L. Community structure of bacteria and fungi in aerosols of a pig confinement building. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 80, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zeng, Q.Y.; Westermark, S.O.; Rasmuson-Lestander, A.; Wang, X.R. Detection and quantification of Wallemia sebi in aerosols by real-time PCR, conventional PCR, and cultivation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7295–7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sakamoto, T.; Torii, S.; Yamada, M.; Urisu, A.; Iguchi, H.; Ueda, M.; Matsuda, Y. Allergenic and antigenic activities of the osmophilic fungus Wallemia sebi asthmatic patients. Arerugi Allergy 1989, 38, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Sakamoto, T.; Urisu, A.; Yamada, M.; Matsuda, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Torii, S. Studies on the osmophilic fungus Wallemia sebi as an allergen evaluated by skin prick test and radioallergosorbent test. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 1989, 90, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Known habitats, geographic distributions, and pathogenic potentials of the eight members of the genus Wallemia. Adapted after [5,6,8,9,13,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Table 1. Known habitats, geographic distributions, and pathogenic potentials of the eight members of the genus Wallemia. Adapted after [5,6,8,9,13,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Wallemia spp.HabitatGeographic DistributionPathogenic Incidence
W. sebiHypersaline water in solar salterns and salt lakes; hay; sea salt; air and dust in indoor environments (house, office, storage areas); pond water, mineral water; seeds (sunflower, wheat, rye, barley, maize, in-shell peanuts, pecans, peas); baked goods (bread, ginger bread, marzipan cake); beans (mung, soybeans and soy products, green coffee beans); cereals (corn, rice, wheat); chocolate, milk and condensed milk; chili and peppers, fruits and fruit products (dates, jams, jellies, dried prunes, sultanas); maple syrup, dried salted fish, meat products, suetWorldwide (Africa, Asia, Europe, North America)Chronic ulcerative skin lesion in man (one case reported, Groningen, The Netherlands); fatal livestock toxicosis associated with contaminated hay (one case reported, Berkshire, UK)
W. mellicolaSalty foods (peanuts, dried fish); sugared food (date honey, cakes, jam, maple syrup, chocolate); dried food (bread, coconut pulp); hypersaline waters of solar salterns; air, dust and surfaces in indoor environments; soil; forest plants; seeds, straw, pollenWorldwide (Asia, Europe, North America, Middle America, South America, Micronesia)Subcutaneous lesion (phaeohyphomycosis) on foot in an immunocompetent human patient (Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India)
W. muriaeSugared food (date honey, cake, chocolate); salty food (peanuts); edible crickets and locusts; hypersaline waters of salterns world-wide; dry substrates (straw, seeds); air in agricultural and human associated environments; an insect (one report)Worldwide (Asia, Europe, North America, South America)Farmer’s lung disease; bronchial asthma
W. ichthyophagaHypersaline waters of salterns in Slovenia and Namibia; salted meat and fish; klipfish (salted cod)—not recorded from environmental substrates with high sugar contentSporadic (Slovenia, Norway, Namibia)No reports
W. tropicalisSoil; house dustSubtropical and tropical climates (Egypt, Uruguay, Indonesia and Micronesia)No reports
W. canadensisCedar swamp; catwalk in silos; indoor dust and airTemperate and cold climates (Canada, UK, Finland)No reports
W. hederaeCommon on ivy flowers (pollen); oak honey, barley seeds, hay, green coffee beansSouthern Europe (Slovenia, Croatia), South America (Mexico)No reports
W. peruviensisAir in agricultural settingsSouth America, PeruNo reports

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop