Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Aroma Compounds as a Function of Different Nitrogen Sources in Fermentations Using Non-Saccharomyces Wine Yeasts
Previous Article in Journal
Osteoarticular Infections in Children: Accurately Distinguishing between MSSA and Kingella kingae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/microorganisms11010013
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Parallel Evolution to Elucidate the Contributions of PA0625 and parE to Ciprofloxacin Sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

by
Qi Liu
,
Liwen Yin
,
Chenjing Lv
,
Fang Bai
,
Zhihui Cheng
,
Weihui Wu
and
Yongxin Jin
*
State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010013
Submission received: 27 November 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Antimicrobial Agents and Resistance)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous pathogen that causes a wide range of acute and chronic infections. Ciprofloxacin, one of the first-line fluoroquinolone class antibiotics, is commonly used for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. However, ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa is increasingly reported worldwide, making treatment difficult. To determine resistance-related mutations, we conducted an experimental evolution using a previously identified ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolate, CRP42. The evolved mutants could tolerate a 512-fold higher concentration of ciprofloxacin than CRP42. Genomic DNA reference mapping was performed, which revealed mutations in genes known to be associated with ciprofloxacin resistance as well as in those not previously linked to ciprofloxacin resistance, including the ParER586W substitution and PA0625 frameshift insertion. Simulation of the ParER586W substitution and PA0625 frameshift insertion by gene editing in CRP42 and the model strain PAO1 demonstrated that while the PA0625 mutation does contribute to resistance, mutation in the ParER586W does not contribute to resistance but rather affects tolerance against ciprofloxacin. These findings advance our understanding of ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa.

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative opportunistic human pathogen with high prevalence in hospitals. It is a common cause of acute and chronic infections in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) or hospitalized in intensive care units [1]. It is recognized as the critical priority tier of antibiotic-resistant pathogens by the World Health Organization for the research and development of new antibiotics [2]. It is also included in the group of “ESKAPE” pathogens, which comprise Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species, for which novel therapeutic options are urgently needed [3].
Ciprofloxacin is one of the first-line fluoroquinolone class antibiotics used to treat a wide range of infections by P. aeruginosa [4]. However, an increasing proportion of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates have been found to be resistant to ciprofloxacin [5]. Multiple mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance have been demonstrated in P. aeruginosa, mainly including (i) mutations in the ciprofloxacin target-encoding genes gyrA/gyrB (encoding DNA gyrase) or parC/parE (encoding topoisomerase IV) to reduce the affinity of targets for ciprofloxacin [6,7]; (ii) mutations in the regulatory genes resulting in overexpression of efflux pumps to increase the expulsion of ciprofloxacin, including mexS (repressor of mexEF-oprN), nfxB (repressor of mexCD-oprJ), mexZ (repressor of mexXY), and mexR (repressor of mexAB-oprM) [4,8]; and (iii) acquisition of ciprofloxacin modifying genes through plasmid-mediated gene transfer [9]. Novel mutations and genes associated with ciprofloxacin resistance were discovered using a laboratory experimental evolution approach to generate ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants from sensitive strains of P. aeruginosa in combination with whole-genome sequencing [10,11]. Although how these mutations contribute to resistance against ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa has not been determined, these studies reveal the high potential of parallel evolution to uncover previously unknown resistance genes.
In this study, we employed experimental evolution and genomic DNA reference mapping to identify resistance genes for ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa. We found mutations in genes known to be associated with ciprofloxacin resistance. Our results also revealed mutations in two genes not previously linked to ciprofloxacin resistance, including the ParER586W substitution and PA0625 frameshift insertion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Primers, and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in the present study are shown in Tables S1 and S2. The P. aeruginosa strain CRP42 was isolated from the sputum sample of a patient [8]. Bacterial cells were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl, and 10 g/L tryptone) or on LB agar plates (supplemented with 15 g/L agar) at 37 °C. When needed, concentrations of tetracycline were used at 10 µg/mL in E. coli and 50 µg/mL in P. aeruginosa. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ciprofloxacin was determined by a 2-fold serial dilution method with modifications [12]. Briefly, each well of a 96-well microtiter plate was filled with 100 µL LB broth with serially diluted concentrations of ciprofloxacin. One hundred microliters of bacterial culture (104 CFU) were inoculated into each well. Growth was assessed visually after 20 h of incubation at 37 °C. All strains were tested in triplicate.

2.2. Parallel Evolution to Select for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Mutants

The continuous ciprofloxacin evolution experiment with three repeats was carried out in LB broth containing increasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin. On day 1, overnight cultures of CRP42 were inoculated (100-fold dilution) into four tubes containing 2, 4, 8, and 16 µg/mL ciprofloxacin, which correspond to 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, and 2× MIC for CRP42, respectively. After 24 h of aerobic culture at 37 °C, cells from each population with the highest concentration of ciprofloxacin that allowed bacterial growth to an optical density at 600 nm above 1 were measured for the MIC and reinoculated into fresh medium as before, containing 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, and 2× MIC (obtained one day earlier). This serial passaging was repeated until the MIC of the evolved strains rose to 4096 µg/mL. Another three repeats were passaged in LB broth medium serving as controls.

2.3. Plasmid Construction and Gene Editing

To make the parE (ParE R586W) point mutation construct, a 1553 bp DNA fragment with the parER586W site located in the middle region was PCR amplified using R3 genomic DNA as a template (primers in Table S2), digested with SacI-HindIII, and then ligated into the pEX18Tc suicide vector [13], leading to pEX18-parER586W. Gene replacement in CRP42 or PAO1 was conducted by conjugally transferring pEX18-parER586W followed by selection for single crossover and then double crossover [13]. The resulting strain CRP42parER586W or PAO1parER586W was confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing analysis (primers in Table S2). Plasmids pEX18-nfxBG180S, pEX18-nfxBX188C, and pEX18-PA0625R3 were generated with similar manipulations as pEX18-parER586W. CRP42nfxBG180S, CRP42nfxBX188C, CSP18mexSCRP42nfxBG180S, CSP18mexSCRP42nfxBX188C, CRP42PA0625R3, and PAO1PA0625R3 were constructed with similar manipulations as CRP42parER586W.
To delete the PA0625 gene, a 762 bp fragment immediately upstream of the PA0625 gene and a 670 bp fragment downstream of the PA0625 gene were amplified using PAO1 or CRP42 genomic DNA as templates (primers in Table S2). These two fragments were digested with EcoRI-BamHI and BamHI-HindIII and then ligated into pEX18Tc, resulting in pEX18-PA0625-1 (PAO1 genomic DNA as template) and pEX18-PA0625-2 (CRP42 genomic DNA as template). Gene deletion in PAO1 or CRP42 was performed with pEX18-PA0625-1 or pEX18-PA0625-2 as described above.

2.4. Genomic DNA Isolation and Reference Mapping

Genomic DNAs of R1, R2, and R3, as well as control strains C1, C2, and C3, were extracted from overnight cultures of bacterial cells using a DNA purification kit (Tiangen Biotec, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA reference mapping was carried out by GENEWIZ Life Sciences (Suzhou, China) as described in our previous studies [8,14]. The raw sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI database with accession number PRJNA875020.

2.5. Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Assay

Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa strains were diluted 50-fold into LB broth medium and grown at 37 ℃ to an OD600 of 1.0. The bacterial cells were treated with ciprofloxacin at a final concentration of 16 μg/mL (for CRP42 and CRP42parER586W) or 0.25 μg/mL (for PAO1 and PAO1parER586W) and then further cultured at 37 ℃ with agitation (200 rpm) for up to 6 h. The number of viable bacterial cells was determined by serial dilution and plating at the indicated time. The bacterial survival% = (live bacterial number after ciprofloxacin treatment) × 100/(initial inoculum bacterial number).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 7.0 software was used to conduct the statistical analyses. P values were calculated using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. Differences were considered statistically significant when the P value was below 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Development of Resistance to Ciprofloxacin by the Clinical Isolate CRP42

To uncover novel ciprofloxacin resistance-related genes and understand the evolutionary characteristics of clinically resistant P. aeruginosa, we utilized strain CRP42, a ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolate due to the GyrA D87G mutation and overexpression of the MexEF-OprN efflux pump [8], to perform parallel evolution. The development of ciprofloxacin resistance was carried out by the daily passage of three biologically replicate populations of CRP42 in LB broth medium containing increasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin. After 17–34 days of evolution, the MICs for the three groups reached 4096 µg/mL (a 512-fold increase compared to CRP42 in Figure S1), whereas no change in MIC was detected for the three control groups that were evolved in the antibiotic-free LB broth for the same period. To validate that the resistance is caused by stable mutations, we streaked the population of each replicate that reached the highest MICs at the evolutionary end on LB agar plates. A random colony was isolated from each of the plates and designated R1, R2, and R3. The strains were cultured in LB broth medium for two sequential passages, and the MICs were determined with the 2-fold dilution method. The MICs of these strains were the same as those of the corresponding populations (Table 1), suggesting that increased resistance to ciprofloxacin was due to stable mutations.

3.2. Candidate Mutations Related to Ciprofloxacin Resistance in the Evolved Strains

To determine the genetic events that contribute to the increased ciprofloxacin resistance in the evolved mutants, we conducted genomic DNA reference mapping for the R1, R2, and R3 strains, as well as the control strains C1, C2, and C3. Table 2 shows the candidate mutations related to ciprofloxacin resistance in the evolved strains that were not present in the C1, C2, or C3 strains (all mutated genes are listed in Table S3). The threonine at position 83 of GyrA was substituted with isoleucine, alanine, and valine in the R1, R2, and R3 strains, respectively (Table 2). It has been reported that T83 plays a key role in the binding of ciprofloxacin by GyrA of P. aeruginosa [4]. GyrA variants with T83I and T83A substitutions have been associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates and in vitro-evolved resistant mutants [15,16]. In addition to GyrA, mutations were also observed in GyrB (a proline insertion after codon A458 in R2), ParC (substitutions E91K in R1 and S87L in R3), and ParE (EV insertion before codon D450 in R1, VD insertion before codon G451 in R2, and R586W substitution in R3). All three strains also carried mutations in the nfxB gene (stop codon changed to cysteine in R1 and R2, and G180S substitution in R3), which encodes a repressor for the efflux pump MexCD-OprJ [17]. G180S substitution and stop codon loss mutation (stop codon changed to arginine) have been reported to impair NfxB repressor activity, leading to ciprofloxacin resistance in the strain PAO1 [18]. In line with a previous study [18], our simulated replacements of nfxB increased the MIC of ciprofloxacin in both CRP42 and CSP18mexSCRP42, a strain with MexEF-OprN efflux pump overproduction [8] (Table 1). In addition, strain R3 carried a frameshift insertion in PA0625, which encodes a possible lytic system of R-type pyocin [19,20].

3.3. The ParER586W Substitution Is Not Responsible for Resistance, but Tolerance to Ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa

Mutations in the genes encoding GryA/B and ParC/E are major contributors to ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa [4]. The alterations in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) in GyrA/B and ParC/E caused by mutations have been reported to contribute to ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa [6,21]. All the mutations in GyrA/B and ParC/E in the R1, R2, and R3 strains, except for the ParER586W mutation in R3, are located in the QRDR [21]. Therefore, we wanted to investigate whether the R586W substitution in ParE plays a role in ciprofloxacin resistance. The chromosomal parE gene of the parental strain CRP42 was replaced by parER3, and the MIC of ciprofloxacin was measured. As shown in Table 1, the replacement of parE with parER3 had no impact on the MIC of CRP42. The R586W mutation was further generated in ParE of the model strain PAO1. Consistent with the unchanged MIC of CRP42parER586W, the PAO1parER586W strain displayed the same MIC against ciprofloxacin as its parental strain PAO1 (Table 1). These results suggested that the ParER586W substitution is not responsible for ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa.
Next, we examined the role of the ParER586W mutation in the tolerance of P. aeruginosa against ciprofloxacin using the killing assay. Ciprofloxacin concentrations at 2 × MICs for CRP42 and CRP42parER586W (16 μg/mL) or PAO1 and PAO1parER586W (0.25 μg/mL) were used. As shown in Figure 1, the ParER586W substitution significantly increased the bacterial survival rate in both the PAO1 and CRP42 strains.

3.4. PA0625 Mutation Contributes to Ciprofloxacin Resistance in P. aeruginosa

The region from PA0613 to PA0648 encodes bacteriophage-like pyocins [22]. Expression of the genes in this region, including PA0625, was induced by ciprofloxacin [22]. Mutations in some genes in this region have been found to increase resistance to ciprofloxacin in both PAO1 and PA14 strains [22,23]. Our reference mapping and sequencing analysis for the PA0625 amplicon of the R3 strain revealed that R3 carries a frameshift insertion in PA0625. However, the contribution of PA0625 to ciprofloxacin resistance has not been established in P. aeruginosa. To test whether the PA0625 mutation increased the resistance to ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa, we replaced the PA0625 gene with PA0625R3 and deleted PA0625 in both the CRP42 and PAO1 strains using gene recombination. As shown in Table 1, the deletion or replacement of PA0625 with PA0625R3 resulted in a 1.2-fold and a 2-fold increase in the MIC of ciprofloxacin in CRP42 and PAO1, respectively. These results demonstrated that PA0625 is involved in ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa.

4. Discussion

P. aeruginosa can cause serious nosocomial infections, and treatment is challenging. Ciprofloxacin, one of the first-line fluoroquinolone class antibiotics, has become an important tool in treating P. aeruginosa infections, but increasing resistance threatens its efficacy. Demonstrating novel resistance-related mutations during the development of bacterial resistance to ciprofloxacin may provide clues for novel strategies to suppress resistance evolution. In this study, we combined an in vitro evolution assay with genomic DNA reference mapping to determine resistance-related mutations. We found that mutations occur in genes known to be associated with ciprofloxacin resistance. Our results also revealed that the PA0625 mutation contributes to ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa, while the ParER586W substitution confers P. aeruginosa tolerance to ciprofloxacin.
parE encodes the ParE subunit of topoisomerase IV in P. aeruginosa. ParE variants with amino acid changes of D419N, E459D, A473V, and S457R have been shown to be associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa [4,6,7]. Mutations in the parE gene for fluoroquinolone resistance are rare compared to those in gyrA and parC, perhaps because alterations in the sequence of ParE confer lower-level resistance against fluoroquinolone [4,7]. In this study, we demonstrated that the ParE R586W substitution, which was located away from the QRDR, does not contribute to resistance but confers tolerance against ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa. Since antibiotic tolerance mutations facilitate the rapid evolution of resistance in E. coli [24], it is possible that the ParER586W mutation paves the way for the subsequent evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa.
Pyocins are bacteriocins that are synthesized by more than 90% of P. aeruginosa strains [19]. R-type pyocins are able to kill other Gram-negative bacteria in a bacterial niche [19]. Production and release of pyocins lead to lysis of the producer cells [20]. Pyocin biosynthesis genes contribute to bacterial susceptibility to ciprofloxacin because mutations in some of those genes increase resistance to ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in P. aeruginosa [22]. Our previous studies showed that upregulation of pyocin biosynthesis genes contributes to increased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin [25,26], while downregulation of pyocin biosynthesis genes increases ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa [27]. Here, we showed that the PA0625 mutation conferred increased ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa. Given the importance of cell lysis in R-type pyocin-mediated susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and the fact that PA0625 likely encodes a lytic system similar to those of bacteriophages [20,22], it is possible that a mutation in PA0625 disabled bacterial cell lysis by R-type pyocin in the presence of ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa.
In summary, we discovered two novel mutations that contribute to P. aeruginosa resistance to ciprofloxacin, including PA0625, which directly contributes to resistance, and the ParE R586W substitution, which contributes to tolerance against ciprofloxacin. These findings advance our understanding of ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11010013/s1. Figure S1: Development of resistance against ciprofloxacin by clinical isolate CRP42. MICs of experimentally evolved mutants to ciprofloxacin. Three lineages were passaged in the presence of ciprofloxacin for experimental evolution. The MICs of ciprofloxacin were measured daily. Table S1: Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study. Table S2: Primers used in this study. Table S3: Gene mutations identified by genome reference mapping with elimination of SNVs with heterozygous mutations, synonymous mutations, and the same mutations between evolved strains and control strains. Reference [28] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and Y.J.; methodology, Q.L., L.Y. and C.L.; software, Q.L.; validation, Q.L. and L.Y.; formal analysis, Q.L. and Y.J.; investigation, Q.L.; data curation, Q.L. and Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L. and Y.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.J.; visualization, Q.L.; supervision, F.B., Z.C., W.W. and Y.J.; project administration, Y.J.; funding acquisition, F.B., Z.C. and W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (31970680, 31870130, 32170177, 32170199, and 31970179) and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2021YFE0201300, 2021YFE0101700, and 82061148018). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data of genomic DNA reference mapping have been deposited in the NCBI with accession number, PRJNA875020 (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA875020+, accessed on 30 August 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Bentzmann, S.; Plésiat, P. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa opportunistic pathogen and human infections. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boucher, H.W.; Talbot, G.H.; Bradley, J.S.; Edwards, J.E.; Gilbert, D.; Rice, L.B.; Scheld, M.; Spellberg, B.; Bartlett, J. Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2009, 48, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rehman, A.; Patrick, W.M.; Lamont, I.L. Mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: New approaches to an old problem. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pitt, T.L.; Sparrow, M.; Warner, M.; Stefanidou, M. Survey of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from UK patients with cystic fibrosis to six commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. Thorax 2003, 58, 794–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lee, J.K.; Lee, Y.S.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, B.S. Alterations in the GyrA and GyrB subunits of topoisomerase II and the ParC and ParE subunits of topoisomerase IV in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 25, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pasca, M.R.; Dalla Valle, C.; De Jesus Lopes Ribeiro, A.L.; Buroni, S.; Papaleo, M.C.; Bazzini, S.; Udine, C.; Incandela, M.L.; Daffara, S.; Fani, R.; et al. Evaluation of fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug resistance clinical isolates. Microb. Drug Resist. 2012, 18, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, C.; Liu, H.; Pan, X.; Ma, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, G.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W.; et al. Mechanisms for Development of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in a Clinical Isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 598291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chávez-Jacobo, V.M.; Hernández-Ramírez, K.C.; Romo-Rodríguez, P.; Pérez-Gallardo, R.V.; Campos-García, J.; Gutiérrez-Corona, J.F.; García-Merinos, J.P.; Meza-Carmen, V.; Silva-Sánchez, J.; Ramírez-Díaz, M.I. CrpP Is a Novel Ciprofloxacin-Modifying Enzyme Encoded by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pUM505 Plasmid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02629-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cabot, G.; Zamorano, L.; Moyà, B.; Juan, C.; Navas, A.; Blázquez, J.; Oliver, A. Evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrobial Resistance and Fitness under Low and High Mutation Rates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 1767–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wong, A.; Rodrigue, N.; Kassen, R. Genomics of adaptation during experimental evolution of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, 8th ed.; M07-A8; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2009; Volume 29. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoang, T.T.; Karkhoff-Schweizer, R.R.; Kutchma, A.J.; Schweizer, H.P. A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: Application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 1998, 212, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, Z.; Xu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Pan, X.; Liu, H.; Zhu, G.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W.; et al. A MexR Mutation Which Confers Aztreonam Resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 659808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bruchmann, S.; Dötsch, A.; Nouri, B.; Chaberny, I.F.; Häussler, S. Quantitative contributions of target alteration and decreased drug accumulation to Pseudomonas aeruginosa fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wardell, S.J.T.; Rehman, A.; Martin, L.W.; Winstanley, C.; Patrick, W.M.; Lamont, I.L. A large-scale whole-genome comparison shows that experimental evolution in response to antibiotics predicts changes in naturally evolved clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01619-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Purssell, A.; Poole, K. Functional characterization of the NfxB repressor of the mexCD-oprJ multidrug efflux operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 2013, 159, 2058–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Monti, M.R.; Morero, N.R.; Miguel, V.; Argaraña, C.E. nfxB as a novel target for analysis of mutation spectra in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Michel-Briand, Y.; Baysse, C. The pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochimie 2002, 84, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakayama, K.; Takashima, K.; Ishihara, H.; Shinomiya, T.; Kageyama, M.; Kanaya, S.; Ohnishi, M.; Murata, T.; Mori, H.; Hayashi, T. The R-type pyocin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is related to P2 phage, and the F-type is related to lambda phage. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akasaka, T.; Tanaka, M.; Yamaguchi, A.; Sato, K. Type II topoisomerase mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in 1998 and 1999: Role of target enzyme in mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 2263–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brazas, M.D.; Hancock, R.E. Ciprofloxacin induction of a susceptibility determinant in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3222–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Breidenstein, E.B.; Khaira, B.K.; Wiegand, I.; Overhage, J.; Hancock, R.E. Complex ciprofloxacin resistome revealed by screening a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant library for altered susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4486–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Levin-Reisman, I.; Ronin, I.; Gefen, O.; Braniss, I.; Shoresh, N.; Balaban, N.Q. Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance. Science 2017, 355, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, F.; Chen, G.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, L.; Jin, S.; Wu, W. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Oligoribonuclease Contributes to Tolerance to Ciprofloxacin by Regulating Pyocin Biosynthesis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02256-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Long, Y.; Fu, W.; Wang, S.; Deng, X.; Jin, Y.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W. Fis Contributes to Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ciprofloxacin by Regulating Pyocin Synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00064-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, M.; Pan, X.; Fu, W.; Ren, H.; Chen, R.; Bai, F.; Jin, Y.; Cheng, Z.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Contributes to Ciprofloxacin Resistance by Regulating PrtR. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kaufman, M.R.; Jia, J.; Zeng, L.; Ha, U.; Chow, M.; Jin, S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated apoptosis requires the ADP-ribosylating activity of exoS. Microbiology 2000, 146 Pt 10, 2531–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 00013 g001 550
Figure 1. Roles of the ParER586W mutation in the bacterial tolerance to ciprofloxacin. Bacterial cultures at an OD600 of 1.0 were treated with (A) 16 µg/mL and (B) 0.25 µg/mL ciprofloxacin in LB broth with agitation. Bacterial cells were collected at the indicated time points, and the survival% were determined by serial dilution and plating. The data represent the results from three independent experiments, and the error bars represent standard deviations. *, P < 0.05, **; P < 0.01, by Student’s t test.
Figure 1. Roles of the ParER586W mutation in the bacterial tolerance to ciprofloxacin. Bacterial cultures at an OD600 of 1.0 were treated with (A) 16 µg/mL and (B) 0.25 µg/mL ciprofloxacin in LB broth with agitation. Bacterial cells were collected at the indicated time points, and the survival% were determined by serial dilution and plating. The data represent the results from three independent experiments, and the error bars represent standard deviations. *, P < 0.05, **; P < 0.01, by Student’s t test.
Microorganisms 11 00013 g001
Table
Table 1. MICs (μg/mL) of indicated P. aeruginosa strains.
Table 1. MICs (μg/mL) of indicated P. aeruginosa strains.
StrainsCiprofloxacin (μg/mL)
CRP428
R14096
R24096
R34096
CRP42nfxBG180S16
CRP42nfxBX188C16
CSP18mexSCRP422
CSP18mexSCRP42nfxBG180S4
CSP18mexSCRP42nfxBX188C4
PAO11/8
PAO1parER586W1/8
PAO1PA0625R31/4
PAO1ΔPA06251/4
CRP42parER586W8
CRP42PA0625R39.5
CRP42ΔPA06259.5
Table
Table 2. Candidate mutations related to ciprofloxacin resistance in experimentally evolved strains by comparison with the P. aeruginosa PAO1.
Table 2. Candidate mutations related to ciprofloxacin resistance in experimentally evolved strains by comparison with the P. aeruginosa PAO1.
GeneGene
Description		Amino Acid Change a
R1R2R3C1C2C3
gyrADNA gyrase subunit AT83IT83AT83V---
gyrBDNA gyrase subunit B-A458AP----
parCtopoisomerase IV subunit AE91K-S87L---
parEtopoisomerase IV subunit BD450EVDG451VDGR586W---
nfxBtranscriptional regulator NfxBX188CX188CG180S---
PA0625hypothetical protein--L659fs---
a same as that in PAO1 (www.pseudomonas.com, accessed on 6 January 2021).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Q.; Yin, L.; Lv, C.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W.; Jin, Y. Parallel Evolution to Elucidate the Contributions of PA0625 and parE to Ciprofloxacin Sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010013

AMA Style

Liu Q, Yin L, Lv C, Bai F, Cheng Z, Wu W, Jin Y. Parallel Evolution to Elucidate the Contributions of PA0625 and parE to Ciprofloxacin Sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Qi, Liwen Yin, Chenjing Lv, Fang Bai, Zhihui Cheng, Weihui Wu, and Yongxin Jin. 2023. "Parallel Evolution to Elucidate the Contributions of PA0625 and parE to Ciprofloxacin Sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010013

APA Style

Liu, Q., Yin, L., Lv, C., Bai, F., Cheng, Z., Wu, W., & Jin, Y. (2023). Parallel Evolution to Elucidate the Contributions of PA0625 and parE to Ciprofloxacin Sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms, 11(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop