Next Article in Journal
Bladder Microbiota Are Associated with Clinical Conditions That Extend beyond the Urinary Tract
Previous Article in Journal
Placental Alterations in a Chikungunya-Virus-Infected Pregnant Woman: A Case Report
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms10050873
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pathogenic Leptospira Species Are Widely Disseminated among Wild Rodents in Urban Areas of Guangzhou, Southern China

by
Jian-Wei Shao
1,†,
Yue-Hong Wei
2,†,
Xin-Yan Yao
1,†,
Hai-Yan Chen
2,
Hong Liu
1,
Jing Sun
1 and
Shou-Yi Chen
2,3,*
1
School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
2
Department of Parasitic Disease and Endemic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, China
3
Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050873
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 19 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 22 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Leptospirosis is a neglected zoonotic disease with global importance caused by pathogenic Leptospira. Rodents are considered the most significant reservoirs for both human and animal infection. Historically, Guangzhou has been an endemic region of human leptospirosis. Although the incidence in humans has significantly decreased in the past decades in China, the epidemiology of pathogenic Leptospira in wild rodents is of great significance for the prevention and control of human leptospirosis. In this study, a total of 296 wild rodents were trapped in urban areas of Guangzhou, in southern China, in 2020. Three pathogenic Leptospira species, i.e., Leptospira interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri, were detected by nested PCR in this wild rodent population with an overall prevalence of 9.5%. Additionally, L. interrogans was detected in three of the four captured rodent species, and the relative high prevalence suggests that L. interrogans probably represents the preponderant species of the pathogenic Leptospira circulating in Guangzhou. Taken together, this study reveals a high genetic diversity of pathogenic Leptospira disseminated among wild rodents in the urban areas of Guangzhou and emphasizes that the risk for the occurrence of human leptospirosis in Guangzhou remains high.

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is a neglected zoonotic disease of global public health concern caused by pathogenic spirochetes of the genus Leptospira [1,2]. The WHO reported that the global burden of leptospirosis potentially reaches up to one million severe human cases, with more than 60,000 deaths annually [3,4]. Formerly, human leptospirosis was prevalent mainly in east/southeast Asia and South America [5]. However, it has recently been recognized as an emerging or re-emerging infectious disease frequently reported in Europe, North America, and Africa [4,6,7,8]. As a result, leptospirosis has emerged globally as an important infectious disease and has attracted increasing attention around the world [2].
The genus Leptospira comprises highly diversified bacteria that can be divided into pathogenic, intermediate, and saprophytic groups based on their genetic characteristics [1,2,9]. The species of the pathogenic group, including Leptospira interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, L. kirschneri, L. alexanderi, L. alstonii, L. kmetyi, L. noguchii, L. santarosai, L. mayottensis, and L. weilii, are the major etiological agents of leptospirosis globally [1,9]. Among them, L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri are the most abundant species circulating worldwide [10] and also the predominant pathogenic species responsible for human leptospirosis in China [11].
Leptospirosis is a category B notifiable disease in China and has joined the list of nationally monitored infectious diseases since 1955 [11]. The first human leptospirosis case in mainland China was reported in the Guangdong province in 1934 and was followed by confirmed cases in the majority of provinces and areas of China, ultimately resulting in more than 2.5 million cases and over 20,000 deaths [12]. Based on different human leptospirosis incidence rates, China can be divided into four regions [12,13]. Guangzhou, the provincial capital of Guangdong and the largest city of southern China, is located in region A, which historically has had a relatively high incidence rate [12,13]. Thanks to the national surveillance system and prevention and control programs, improved housing, better waste management, and the improvement of agricultural mechanization, the average annual incidence of human leptospirosis in China has dramatically decreased [13]. A recent study indicated that for the past decade, human leptospirosis in China was primarily distributed in central-southern China, including the Guangdong province [14]. According to data available from the official departments of mainland China, the total number of confirmed leptospirosis cases nationwide was 297 in 2020, of which 23 cases were reported in the Guangdong province (http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s3578/202103/f1a448b7df7d4760976fea6d55834966.shtml, accessed on 12 March 2021; http://wsjkw.gd.gov.cn/zwgk_zwwgk_jggk/content/post_3227857.html, accessed on 19 February 2021).
At least 200 species of animals, including mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles, have been identified as natural carriers of pathogenic Leptospira species worldwide [9,15,16]. In China, more than 60 species of wild and domestic animals are confirmed hosts [12]. Rodents are considered prominent maintenance hosts for Leptospira spp. and may transfer the infection to livestock, pets, and humans [17]. As a result, the surveillance of pathogenic Leptospira in rodents is of great importance for the prevention and control of the disease. Therefore, we screened rodents sampled from urban areas in Guangzhou city for pathogenic Leptospira species to better understand the epidemiology of these bacteria in wild rodents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rodents Trapping and Samples Processing

Rodents were trapped in cages using cooked food as bait in the urban areas of six districts (Liwan, Huadu, Tianhe, Huangpu, Baiyun, and Conghua) in Guangzhou city in 2020 (Figure 1). Specifically, rodents were captured in the inner-city districts of Liwan, Huadu, Tianhe, Huangpu, and Baiyun, and in the sub-urban area of Conghua. The rodent species, weight, age, and sex were identified through morphological examination performed by trained field biologists, and the species were further confirmed by sequence analysis of the mt-cyt b gene [18]. All rodents were captured alive and killed immediately after anesthesia. The kidney tissue samples were collected and stored at −80 °C until further use.
Approximately 30 mg of kidney samples were homogenized in 500 μL sterile phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS, pH = 7.02, GIBCO), and the total DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (OMEGA, Doraville, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, all extracted DNA samples were screened for the presence of DNA from pathogenic Leptospira.

2.2. Detection and Molecular Characterization of Pathogenic Leptospira

Leptospira was detected using a nested PCR, targeting a conserve region of the 16S rRNA (rrs) gene in pathogenic Leptospira species [19]. To better identify and characterize the different species in the positive samples, the nearly complete sequences of the rrs gene and the sequence of the secY gene, which has shown to be suitable for phylogenetic analysis of pathogenic Leptospira [20,21], were also recovered. Distilled water was used as a negative control for PCR amplification. The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1.
The PCR products of the expected size, according to each set of primers, were purified using a gel extraction kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) after electrophoresis. The purified DNA was cloned into a pMD19-T vector (TaKaRa, China), and the resulting plasmid was used to transform competent E. coli cells. Positive inserts were confirmed by PCR, and five positive clones were sequenced by the Sangon Biotechnology Company (Shanghai, China). To prevent contamination, the preparation of the PCR mix and the addition of the template DNA were performed in separate rooms using dedicated pipets and filtered tips.

2.3. Sequence Comparison and Phylogenetic Analysis

Sequence assembly and manual editing were performed using the SeqMan program (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). The nucleotide (nt) sequence identities were calculated by the MegAlign program available within the Lasergene software package (version 7.1, DNAstar) [22]. All the sequences obtained in this study have been submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers OK617223–OK617250 and OK632480–OK632507.
The best-fit evolutionary model of nt substitution was determined using jModelTest [23]. The maximum-likelihood (ML) trees were constructed based on the general time-reversible (GTR) nucleotide substitution model and the optimized parameters of gamma (Γ)-distribution and proportion of invariable sites (i.e., GTR + Γ + I) with bootstrap support values calculated from 100 replicates implemented in MEGA X [24]. All phylogenetic trees were mid-point rooted for purposes of clarity only.

2.4. Statistical Data Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 22.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square tests were performed to determine differences of positive rates between different Leptospira species. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The 95% confidence interval was calculated using the Epitools (https://epitools.ausvet.com.au/trueprevalence, accessed on 1 December 2021), with the parameters listed as follows: sensitivity, 0.9; specificity, 0.99; confidence interval, 95%; confidence intervals for apparent prevalence, Wilson.

2.5. Ethics Statement

The authors confirm that the study complies with the ethical policies of the journal, as specified in the journal’s guidelines. The sampling procedures and sample processing were approved by the ethics committee of the Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All animals were treated in strict accordance with the Rules for the Implementation of Laboratory Animal Medicine (1998) from the Ministry of Health, China.

3. Results

3.1. Detection of Pathogenic Leptospira

A total of 296 rodents, including 250 Rattus norvegicus, 40 R. losea, 2 R. tanezumi, and 4 Mus musculus, were captured in 6 districts of Guangzhou city (Figure 1 and Table 2). Among all rodents, the female and male rodents numbered 123 and 173, respectively. In addition,272 rodents were adult, and only 24 rodents were juveniles. After screening the total DNAs extracted from the kidneys of these rodents using primers targeting the rrs gene of pathogenic Leptospira, PCR products of expected sizes were detected in 28 samples. Overall, the mean positive rate was 9.5% (Table 2), and R. norvegicus and R. losea showed relatively high infection rates of 8.8% and 12.5%, respectively. The positive rate of pathogenic Leptospira infection in Mus musculus was 25.0%, which was higher than that in other rodent species. However, this difference was not statistically supported due to the limited number of Mus musculus collected. Importantly, the infection rates of pathogenic Leptospira in R. norvegicus, which were captured in all sampling sites, ranged from 4.2% to 30%, with the highest prevalence in the R. norvegicus captured in the Conghua district.

3.2. Molecular Characterization of Pathogenic Leptospira

To better identify and characterize the detected pathogenic Leptospira species, the nearly complete rrs and secY gene sequences were recovered. Sequencing and analyses using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) based on the rrs gene sequences (1100 bp) revealed that all Leptospira strains detected in this study were determined as L. interrogans (n = 17), L. borgpetersenii (n = 9), and L. kirschneri (n = 2).
The rrs and secY gene sequences of L. interrogans recovered from the 17 positive samples of this study were closely related to each other, with 99.6–100.0% and 98.3–100.0% of nt homology, respectively, and also shared high nt homology with the corresponding gene sequences of L. interrogans retrieved from GenBank (99.7–100.0% for rrs gene sequences and 97.3–99.9% for secY gene sequences). Similarly, the rrs and secY gene sequences of L. borgpetersenii obtained in this study shared, respectively, 99.2–100.0% and 97.9–100.0% nt homology with each other and exhibited 99.3–100.0% and 97.7–99.7% nt homology with other known rrs and secY gene sequences. Meanwhile, the rrs and secY gene sequences from the two L. kirschneri strains obtained herein shared 99.9% and 99.3% nt homology with each other, respectively, and 99.6–100.0% and 97.2–99.8% nt homology for the rrs and secY gene in blast analysis.
The reconstructed phylogenetic trees based on the rrs and secY sequences showed that all the Leptospira strains identified in this study fell into the pathogenic group and were clearly divided into three clades and clustered together with L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri, respectively (Figure 2).

3.3. Distribution of Pathogenic Leptospira in Rodents

The genetic and phylogenetic analyses revealed that three pathogenic Leptospira species (L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri) were present in the sampled population. Specifically, L. interrogans was detected in three out of the four captured rodent species, excluding R. tanezumi, while L. borgpetersenii was detected in R. norvegicus and R. losea, and L. kirschneri was only detected in R. norvegicus. These three pathogenic species were simultaneously detected in R. norvegicus (Table 3). Additionally, the overall positive rate of L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri among all captured rodents was 5.7% (17/296), 3.0% (9/296), and 0.7% (2/296), respectively (Table 3). A significant difference was observed among the positive rate of these three pathogenic species in rodents (χ2 = 12.464; p = 0.02). Among the 28 Leptospira strains detected in the present study, L. interrogans (60.7%, 17/28) was the predominant species, followed by L. borgpetersenii (32.1%, 9/28) and L. kirschneri (7.1%, 2/28).

4. Discussion

China has a complex eco-geography and climate, and, in most areas, natural conditions are suitable for the survival of pathogenic Leptospira and their host animals. As a consequence, leptospirosis is a common and widespread zoonotic disease in China [11,12]. Although historically Guangdong province has had a relatively high incidence of human leptospirosis, in recent years, the disease has been only sporadically prevalent in this region [12,13,14]. However, limited information is available regarding the epidemiology of pathogenic Leptospira in wild rodents, which are the most important natural reservoirs for this pathogen. Even with limited number of captured rodents within few sampling areas, this study indicates that pathogenic Leptospira is disseminated among wild rodents in southern China, where this disease has historically had a relatively high incidence rate. Notably, this study identified L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, and L. kirschneri, which represent the most abundant species circulating worldwide [10] and are the predominant pathogenic Leptospira species responsible for human leptospirosis in China [11], suggesting the potential risk of Leptospira transmission from wild rodents to humans Guangzhou.
In this study, L. interrogans was detected in three out of four rodent species with the highest prevalence among the three detected Leptospira species. This predominance could be explained by previous experimental and genomic studies, showing that a larger genome, increased numbers of environmental sensing genes, and a better capacity to regulate protein expression may provide L. interrogans with a strong ability to survive outside reservoir hosts [25,26]. More importantly, historically, L. interrogans has been the preponderance species in China and was responsible for at least 60% of the human cases of leptospirosis [12]. Previous studies also demonstrated that L. interrogans was the most prevalent species circulating in small wild animals in China [27,28,29]. Its high prevalence and wide distribution in rodents suggests that L. interrogans is probably still the predominant species of pathogenic Leptospira circulating in nature.
It is widely accepted that rodents play crucial roles as the hosts of pathogenic Leptospira and in the transmission of leptospirosis from animals to humans, owing to their high numbers and close association with human habitats [11,12]. Among all rodent species, R. norvegicus is known as the primary source of Leptospira infection in humans [1,30,31,32]. Many studies have reported the high prevalence of Leptospira in R. norvegicus worldwide [27,28,32,33,34]. In the present study, the relatively high prevalence of Leptospira in R. norvegicus captured in urban areas of Guangzhou is consistent with results from previous studies conducted in urban areas [32,35,36,37]. Collectively, these results suggest that R. norvegicus plays an important role in the transmission of Leptospira in urban environments.
With the acceleration of urbanization, more and more people live in urban ecosystems and the occurrence of urban leptospirosis is rising [38]. As an international metropolis, Guangzhou has a high population density, which is conducive to high prevalence of infectious diseases, including leptospirosis. Moreover, Guangzhou is located in tropical and subtropical regions, with a warm and wet climate [39]. The higher the population density in urban areas, the higher the chance of accessing water contaminated with Leptospira, especially since floods caused by climate change occur frequently, thus the high Leptospira prevalence in rodents indicates there is a high risk of a human leptospirosis outbreak in Guangzhou.
In the present study, a limited number of rodents were sampled in each area, and the species of the rodents were also very common, which may affect the determination of the prevalence of Leptospira in rodents. However, these results, although based on these limited samples, also provide the epidemiological data concerning the Leptospira species disseminated among rodents in the urban areas of Guangzhou. In conclusion, the present study reveals three pathogenic Leptospira species disseminated among wild rodents in the urban areas of Guangzhou, in southern China. The relatively high infection rate of pathogenic Leptospira in rodents is a reminder that a high risk for the occurrence of human leptospirosis in Guangzhou exists.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-W.S. and S.-Y.C.; Methodology, J.-W.S. and X.-Y.Y.; Software, J.-W.S.; Formal Analysis, Y.-H.W. and J.-W.S.; Resources, Y.-H.W. and H.-Y.C.; Investigation, Y.-H.W., H.L. and J.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.-W.S.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.-Y.C.; Visualization, J.-W.S.; Supervision, J.-W.S. and S.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Basic Research Project of Key Laboratory of Guangzhou (No.202102100001) and the Key Project of Agricultural and Social Development Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (No.202103000008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences obtained in this study have been submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers OK617223–OK617250 and OK632480–OK632507.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 296–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bharti, A.R.; Nally, J.E.; Ricaldi, J.N.; Matthias, M.A.; Diaz, M.M.; Lovett, M.A.; Levett, P.N.; Gilman, R.H.; Willig, M.R.; Gotuzzo, E.; et al. Leptospirosis: A zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Costa, F.; Hagan, J.E.; Calcagno, J.; Kane, M.; Torgerson, P.; Martinez-Silveira, M.S.; Stein, C.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Ko, A.I. Global morbidity and mortality of Leptospirosis: A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hartskeerl, R.A.; Collares-Pereira, M.; Ellis, W.A. Emergence, control and re-emerging leptospirosis: Dynamics of infection in the changing world. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ricaldi, J.N.; Swancutt, M.A.; Matthias, M.A. Current trends in translational research in leptospirosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 26, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biggs, H.M.; Hertz, J.T.; Munishi, O.M.; Galloway, R.L.; Marks, F.; Saganda, W.; Maro, V.P.; Crump, J.A. Estimating leptospirosis incidence using hospital-based surveillance and a population-based health care utilization survey in Tanzania. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dupouey, J.; Faucher, B.; Edouard, S.; Richet, H.; Kodjo, A.; Drancourt, M.; Davoust, B. Human leptospirosis: An emerging risk in Europe? Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 37, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vitale, M.; Agnello, S.; Chetta, M.; Amato, B.; Vitale, G.; Bella, C.D.; Vicari, D.; Presti, V. Human leptospirosis cases in Palermo Italy. The role of rodents and climate. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Picardeau, M. Virulence of the zoonotic agent of leptospirosis: Still terra incognita? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thaipadungpanit, J.; Wuthiekanun, V.; Chierakul, W.; Smythe, L.D.; Petkanchanapong, W.; Limpaiboon, R.; Apiwatanaporn, A.; Slack, A.T.; Suputtamongkol, Y.; White, N.J.; et al. A dominant clone of Leptospira interrogans associated with an outbreak of human leptospirosis in Thailand. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2007, 1, e56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, W.; Lin, X.; Yan, J. Leptospira and leptospirosis in China. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 27, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Yan, J. Leptospirosis prevalence in Chinese populations in the last two decades. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dhewantara, P.W.; Mamun, A.A.; Zhang, W.-Y.; Yin, W.-W.; Ding, F.; Guo, D.; Hu, W.; Costa, F.; Ko, A.I.; Soares Magalhães, R.J. Epidemiological shift and geographical heterogeneity in the burden of leptospirosis in China. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2018, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Mehmood, K.; Liu, J.; McDonough, S.P.; Tang, Z.; Chang, Y.F. Leptospirosis trends in China, 2007–2018: A retrospective observational study. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ellis, W.A. Animal leptospirosis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 387, 99–137. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma, X.J.; Gong, X.Q.; Xiao, X.; Liu, J.W.; Han, H.J.; Qin, X.R.; Lei, S.C.; Gu, X.L.; Yu, H.; Yu, X.J. Detection of Leptospira interrogans in Hedgehogs from central China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meerburg, B.G.; Singleton, G.R.; Kijlstra, A. Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 35, 221–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, W.P.; Lin, X.D.; Wang, W.; Tian, J.H.; Cong, M.L.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, M.R.; Zhou, R.H.; Wang, J.B.; Li, M.H.; et al. Phylogeny and origins of hantaviruses harbored by bats, insectivores, and rodents. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Djadid, N.D.; Ganji, Z.F.; Gouya, M.M.; Rezvani, M.; Zakeri, S. A simple and rapid nested polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique for differentiation of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Leptospira spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 63, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bourhy, P.; Herrmann Storck, C.; Theodose, R.; Olive, C.; Nicolas, M.; Hochedez, P.; Lamaury, I.; Zinini, F.; Brémont, S.; Landier, A.; et al. Serovar diversity of pathogenic Leptospira circulating in the French West Indies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guernier, V.; Richard, V.; Nhan, T.; Rouault, E.; Tessier, A.; Musso, D. Leptospira diversity in animals and humans in Tahiti, French Polynesia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Burland, T.G. DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 132, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eshghi, A.; Cullen, P.A.; Cowen, L.; Zuerner, R.L.; Cameron, C.E. Global proteome analysis of Leptospira interrogans. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4564–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bulach, D.M.; Zuerner, R.L.; Wilson, P.; Seemann, T.; McGrath, A.; Cullen, P.A.; Davis, J.; Johnson, M.; Kuczek, E.; Alt, D.P.; et al. Genome reduction in Leptospira borgpetersenii reflects limited transmission potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14560–14565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, T.; Qiu, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, E.; Li, S.; Chang, Y.F.; Guo, X.; Jiang, X.; et al. Genetic characteristics of pathogenic Leptospira in wild small animals and livestock in Jiangxi Province, China, 2002-2015. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, C.; Han, S.; Yuan, G.; Zhang, Q.; He, H. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of zoonotic pathogens in urban rats (Rattus spp.) from a subtropical city, Guangzhou, southern China. Zoonoses Public Health 2020, 67, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, C.; Yang, H.; Li, X.; Cao, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zeng, L.; Xu, J.; Xu, Y.; Chang, Y.F.; Guo, X.; et al. Molecular typing of pathogenic Leptospira serogroup icterohaemorrhagiae strains circulating in China during the past 50 years. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Maiden, M.C.; Bygraves, J.A.; Feil, E.; Morelli, G.; Russell, J.E.; Urwin, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zurth, K.; Caugant, D.A.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing: A portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3140–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tucunduva de Faria, M.; Athanazio, D.A.; Gonçalves Ramos, E.A.; Silva, E.F.; Reis, M.G.; Ko, A.I. Morphological alterations in the kidney of rats with natural and experimental Leptospira infection. J. Comp. Pathol. 2007, 137, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Koizumi, N.; Miura, K.; Sanai, Y.; Takemura, T.; Ung, T.T.H.; Le, T.T.; Hirayama, K.; Hasebe, F.; Nguyen, H.L.K.; Hoang, P.V.M.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Leptospira interrogans in Rattus norvegicus in Hanoi, Vietnam. Acta Trop. 2019, 194, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Correa, J.P.; Bucarey, S.A.; Cattan, P.E.; Landaeta-Aqueveque, C.; Ramírez-Estrada, J. Renal carriage of Leptospira species in rodents from Mediterranean Chile: The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) as a relevant host in agricultural lands. Acta Trop. 2017, 176, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Boey, K.; Shiokawa, K.; Rajeev, S. Leptospira infection in rats: A literature review of global prevalence and distribution. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Latifah, I.; Abdul Halim, A.; Rahmat, M.S.; Nadia, M.F.; Ubil, Z.E.; Asmah, H.; Shafariatul Akmar, I.; Picardeau, M.; Siti Haslina, O.; Nasir, M.A. Isolation by culture and PCR identification of LipL32 gene of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in wild rats of Kuala Lumpur. Malays. J. Pathol. 2017, 39, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  36. Himsworth, C.G.; Bidulka, J.; Parsons, K.L.; Feng, A.Y.T.; Tang, P.; Jardine, C.M.; Kerr, T.; Mak, S.; Robinson, J.; Patrick, D.M. Ecology of Leptospira interrogans in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in an inner-city neighborhood of Vancouver, Canada. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Himsworth, C.G.; Parsons, K.L.; Jardine, C.; Patrick, D.M. Rats, cities, people, and pathogens: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of literature regarding the ecology of rat-associated zoonoses in urban centers. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Minter, A.; Himsworth, C.G.; Byers, K.A.; Childs, J.E.; Ko, A.I.; Costa, F. Tails of two cities: Age and wounding are associated with carriage of Leptospira interrogans by Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in ecologically distinct urban environments. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Qin, P.; Lu, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, S.; Li, M.; Yang, Z. Meteorological factors and risk of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006–2015. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 10 00873 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographic maps showing the location of sampling sites from where the rodents were captured in this study. This map was plotted using a combination of Surfer software, Version-4 (Golden Software, Golden, CO, USA), and Adobe illustrator, Version CC2017 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). The black dots indicate the sampling regions in this study.
Figure 1. Geographic maps showing the location of sampling sites from where the rodents were captured in this study. This map was plotted using a combination of Surfer software, Version-4 (Golden Software, Golden, CO, USA), and Adobe illustrator, Version CC2017 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). The black dots indicate the sampling regions in this study.
Microorganisms 10 00873 g001
Microorganisms 10 00873 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of (A) rrs and (B) secY gene of pathogenic Leptospira. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replicates of the alignment, and only bootstrap values >70% are shown at appropriate nodes. The trees were mid-point rooted for clarity only, and corresponding sequences of Leptonema illini were used as the ourgroup. Sequences of Leptospira determined in this study are shown with different labels.
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of (A) rrs and (B) secY gene of pathogenic Leptospira. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replicates of the alignment, and only bootstrap values >70% are shown at appropriate nodes. The trees were mid-point rooted for clarity only, and corresponding sequences of Leptonema illini were used as the ourgroup. Sequences of Leptospira determined in this study are shown with different labels.
Microorganisms 10 00873 g002
Table
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
GenePrimersSequences (5′ → 3′)Amplicon (bp)Reference
rrsnest-1FGGCGGCGCGTCTTAAACATG525[19]
nest-1RGTCCGCCTACGCACCCTTTACG [19]
nest-2FCAAGTCAAGCGGAGTAGCAA289[19]
nest-2RCTTAACCTGCTGCCTCCCGTA [19]
nest-1FGGCGGCGCGTCTTAAACATG 1300[19]
rrs-1RGTACAAGGTCCGGGAACGTA This study
nest-2FCAAGTCAAGCGGAGTAGCAA 1100[19]
rrs-2RGCGAGTTGGCTACCCTTTGT This study
secYsecY-1FGAAGGWCTTCTCGGAATGGTGG1200This study
secY-1RCCKTCCCTTAATTTTAGACTTCTTC This study
secY-2FGCKCTYGGRATYATGCCTTA1100This study
secY-2RTTCATRAAGCCTTCRTAATTTCTCA This study
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of pathogenic Leptospira in rodents by species and location in Guangzhou.
Table 2. Prevalence of pathogenic Leptospira in rodents by species and location in Guangzhou.
SpeciesLocationTotal (%,CI)
LiwanHuaduTianheHuangpuBaiyunConghua
R. norvegicus3/467/504/502/483/463/1022/250
8.8, 5.9−13.0)
R. losea−−−−−5/405/40
(12.5, 5.5−26.1)
R. tanezumi0/2−−−−−0/2 (0)
Mus musculus0/2−−1/2−−1/4
(25.0, 4.6−69.9)
Total
(%,CI)		3/50
(6.0, 2.1−16.2)		7/50
(14.0, 7.0−26.2)		4/50
(8.0, 3.2−18.8)		3/50
(6.0, 2.1−16.2)		3/46
(6.5, 2.2−17.5)		8/50
(16.0, 8.3−28.5)		28/296
(9.5, 6.6−13.3)
Leptospira spp. DNA positive specimens/total specimens; ‘‘−’’ indicates that no animals were captured; CI: 95% confidence interval for apparent prevalence.
Table
Table 3. Distribution of pathogenic Leptospira species among rodents.
Table 3. Distribution of pathogenic Leptospira species among rodents.
SpeciesNo. of IndividualsNo. per Species (Positive Rate per Species, %, CI)
L. interrogansL. borgpeterseniiL. kirschneri
R. norvegicus25012 (4.8, 2.8−8.2)8 (3.2, 1.6−6.2)2 (0.8, 0.2−2.9)
R. losea404 (10.0, 4.0−23.0)1 (2.5, 0.4−12.9)−
R. tanezumi2−−−
Mus musculus41 (25.0, 4.6−69.9)−−
Total (%, CI)29617 (5.7, 3.6−9.0)9 (3.0, 1.6−5.7)2 (0.7, 0.2−2.4)
‘‘−’’ indicates that no positive samples were detected; CI: 95% confidence interval for apparent prevalence.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shao, J.-W.; Wei, Y.-H.; Yao, X.-Y.; Chen, H.-Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, J.; Chen, S.-Y. Pathogenic Leptospira Species Are Widely Disseminated among Wild Rodents in Urban Areas of Guangzhou, Southern China. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050873

AMA Style

Shao J-W, Wei Y-H, Yao X-Y, Chen H-Y, Liu H, Sun J, Chen S-Y. Pathogenic Leptospira Species Are Widely Disseminated among Wild Rodents in Urban Areas of Guangzhou, Southern China. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shao, Jian-Wei, Yue-Hong Wei, Xin-Yan Yao, Hai-Yan Chen, Hong Liu, Jing Sun, and Shou-Yi Chen. 2022. "Pathogenic Leptospira Species Are Widely Disseminated among Wild Rodents in Urban Areas of Guangzhou, Southern China" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050873

APA Style

Shao, J.-W., Wei, Y.-H., Yao, X.-Y., Chen, H.-Y., Liu, H., Sun, J., & Chen, S.-Y. (2022). Pathogenic Leptospira Species Are Widely Disseminated among Wild Rodents in Urban Areas of Guangzhou, Southern China. Microorganisms, 10(5), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop