Next Article in Journal
Invasive and Subcutaneous Infections Caused by Filamentous Fungi: Report from a Portuguese Multicentric Surveillance Program
Previous Article in Journal
XAC4296 Is a Multifunctional and Exclusive Xanthomonadaceae Gene Containing a Fusion of Lytic Transglycosylase and Epimerase Domains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) Detected on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) Samples in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Preliminary Results from Two Italian Centers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hospital-Onset Bloodstream Infections Caused by Eight Sentinel Bacteria: A Nationwide Study in Israel, 2018–2019

1
National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Ministry of Health, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051009
Submission received: 13 April 2022 / Revised: 2 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infections and Sepsis)

Abstract

:
Nationwide studies on hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) are scarce. To describe incidence, mortality and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of HO-BSI caused by eight sentinel bacteria in Israel, we used laboratory-based BSI surveillance data from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. All hospitals reported positive blood cultures growing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. We calculated HO-BSI incidence and 14-day, 30-day and 1-year mortality in adults. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. The study included 6752 HO-BSI events: K. pneumoniae (1659, 22.1%), E. coli (1491, 19.8%), S. aureus (1315, 17.5%), P. aeruginosa (1175, 15.6%), E. faecalis (778, 10.4%), A. baumannii (654, 8.7%), E. faecium (405, 5.4%) and S. pneumoniae (43, 0.6%). Overall incidence was 2.84/1000 admissions (95% CI: 2.77–2.91) and 6.88/10,000 patient-days (95% CI: 6.72–7.05). AMR isolates accounted for 44.2% of events. Fourteen-day, thirty-day and one-year mortality were 30.6% (95% CI: 28.5%–32.8%), 40.2% (95% CI: 38.2%–42.1%) and 66.5% (95% CI: 64.7%–68.3%), respectively. Organisms with highest risk for 30-day mortality (compared with E. coli) were A. baumannii (OR 2.85; 95% CI: 2.3–3.55), E. faecium (OR 2.16; 95% CI: 1.66–2.79) and S. pneumoniae (OR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.21–4.59). Mortality was higher in AMR isolates (OR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.4–1.77). This study highlights the incidence, associated high mortality and important role of antibiotic resistance in HO-BSI.

1. Introduction

Hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) have a substantial impact on patient morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs [1,2]. A point prevalence survey conducted by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) in 2016–2017 estimated that 6.5% of hospitalized patients had at least one episode of a healthcare-associated infection (HAI). Of these, 10.8% were HO-BSIs, translating to an estimated annual incidence of 375,000 HO-BSIs in Europe [3]. Goto et al. estimated 102,000–120,000 HO-BSIs in the USA annually, with a case-fatality rate (CFR) of 15–30% [4].
BSI surveillance is important to determine the burden of disease, to identify trends in incidence and to detect emerging pathogens and emergence of antibiotic resistance [5]. Antibiotic resistance among the predominant nosocomial bacterial pathogens, including Gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci, has risen substantially in the past few decades [6]; this trend has stabilized in Europe over the past few years [7]. Emerging multidrug-resistant organisms threaten the effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment has been associated with increased mortality from BSI [8].
Data on the incidence of HO-BSI can inform clinicians, public health officials, policymakers and the public. These data can be used to raise awareness, encourage the implementation of preventive measures, improve diagnosis and treatment and allocate resources. Most reports on the incidence and prevalence of HO-BSI are based on hospital surveillance studies, and population-based studies, specifically nationwide studies, are scarce [4]. Nationwide surveillance systems have the advantage of including a large number of hospitals and varied hospital types, as well as wide geographic catchment areas [4].
In Israel, the National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control (NIARIC) has monitored BSI caused by eight bacteria of major public health importance (sentinel bacteria) in all acute care hospitals since 2012. The aim of this study was to provide a national estimate of the incidence of HO-BSI caused by these sentinel bacteria, the associated short-term and long-term mortality and the impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

2. Materials and Methods

We followed the STROBE guidelines for observational studies. Supplementary Table S1 lists the elements of the guidelines and where they are found in our study.

2.1. Study Participants

We used laboratory-based surveillance data reported to the NIARIC between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Data were provided by all 29 acute care hospitals in Israel, together accounting for 14,618 acute care hospital beds. We included all BSIs reported for hospitalized adult patients (age ≥ 18 years at onset of bacteremia). We excluded one children’s hospital and one small community hospital with no adult internal medicine ward or ICU.

2.2. Data Collection

Hospital laboratories submitted monthly mandatory reports on all blood cultures positive for the following sentinel bacteria: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium; these are the same pathogens monitored by the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) [7]. Submitted data included patients’ unique identity number (UID), sex, date of birth, admission date, specimen collection date, ward where the culture was taken, type of culture (aerobic, anaerobic or pediatric), isolated organism and results of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST).
We used patients’ UIDs to search for dates of death in the death registry of the Ministry of the Interior. The death registry data were available through 30 April 2020. We obtained data on the number of admissions and patient-days in hospitals from the Israel Ministry of Health [9].

2.3. Laboratory Methods

Blood cultures were processed at the participating laboratories according to each institution’s routine methods for isolate identification and AST.

2.4. Definitions

A BSI event was defined as growth of a sentinel bacteria in blood culture. HO-BSI was defined as a BSI with onset on or after the 4th hospital day, as per CDC guidance for hospital-onset LabID events [10]. The date the first positive blood culture was taken was regarded as the onset of the BSI event. Another blood culture positive for the same organism within 14 days was considered the same event; after 14 days it was defined as a new event [10]. Department of HO-BSI onset was determined according to the patient ward at the time the culture was taken.
Antibiotic susceptibility was based on the first isolate that defined the BSI event, consistent with the method used by EARS-Net [7]. AMR was defined by resistance to key antimicrobial agents in accordance with the WHO priority pathogen list [11]: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (3rd or 4th generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.

2.5. Incidence

Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated as the number of HO-BSI events per 1000 admissions and per 10,000 patient-days. Because the average length of stay (LOS) in acute care hospitals in Israel is 4 days [9], most patients are not at risk for HO-BSI, and these denominators may not accurately fit the period at risk. Therefore, we also used as denominators the number of admissions with LOS longer than 3 days (i.e., admissions at risk) and the number of patient-days after day 3 (i.e., patient-days at risk).

2.6. Mortality

We calculated 14-day, 30-day and 1-year mortality. For this calculation, we excluded patients with a missing or invalid UID, as they could not be matched to the death registry. To calculate 1-year mortality, we included only patients with a potential follow-up period of at least 1 year up to the date we accessed the death registry, i.e., BSI onset prior to 30 April 2019. For patients with multiple BSI events meeting the definition of HO-BSI, each event was analyzed separately.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Patient and HO-BSI event characteristics were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range (IQR) or percentage, as appropriate. We computed IR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) overall and stratified by organism, hospital size, hospital day of onset and AMR. We calculated 14-day, 30-day and 1-year mortality with 95% CI overall and stratified by organism and by risk factor categories including age, sex, hospital size, hospital day of onset, department, AMR and BSI events with at least one other sentinel organism isolated within 5 days. Comparisons of mortality between risk factor categories were performed using the chi-square test. To identify predictors of 30-day mortality, we constructed a multivariable logistic regression model. All risk factors were modeled as categorical, except for age, which was modeled as continuous. All variables with a p-value ≤ 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariable model. No stepwise procedure was further needed, as all variables that were significant in the univariate analysis remained significant or marginally significant in the multivariable model. Analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

2.8. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the jurisdictional institutional review board (IRB). The requirement for informed consent was waived for this analysis of routinely collected surveillance data.

3. Results

3.1. Study Participants

During the two-year study period there were 6752 HO-BSI events caused by sentinel bacteria: K. pneumoniae (1659, 22.1%), E. coli (1491, 19.8%), S. aureus (1315, 17.5%), P. aeruginosa (1175, 15.6%), E. faecalis (778, 10.4%), A. baumannii (654, 8.7%), E. faecium (405, 5.4%) and S. pneumoniae (43, 0.6%). In 10% of HO-BSI events, at least one other sentinel organism was isolated within 5 days. A description of HO-BSI events is presented in Table 1. The mean patient age was 68.5 (±16.3) years, and 42.6% of events occurred in females. HO-BSI occurred after a median of 15 days (IQR: 8–29) after admission. The majority (67.1%) of HO-BSI events occurred in medical wards, and AMR organisms were isolated in 44.2% of HO-BSI events.

3.2. Incidence

Data on HO-BSI incidence by sentinel bacteria and hospitalization characteristics are presented in Table 2. Overall, the IR for HO-BSI by sentinel bacteria was 2.84 per 1000 admissions (95% CI: 2.77–2.91) and 6.88 per 10,000 patient-days (95% CI: 6.72–7.05). When counting only hospitalizations at risk (i.e., with LOS > 3 days), the IR was 8.66 per 1000 admissions (95% CI: 8.45–8.86) and 9.63 per 10,000 patient-days (95% CI: 6.72–7.05). IR increased with hospital size, from 1.61 per 1000 admissions (95% CI: 1.49–1.73) in hospitals with less than 300 hospital beds to 3.43 per 1000 admissions (95% CI: 3.32–3.55) in hospitals with over 700 beds.
Figure 1 shows overall HO-BSI incidence for sentinel bacteria by day of onset. Incidence gradually tripled from 0.5 per 1000 patients hospitalized on day 4 to 1.5 per 1000 patients hospitalized on day 10 and stabilized at 1.75 per 1000 patients hospitalized on day 12 and onwards. The cumulative number of events caused by each sentinel bacteria by hospital day is presented in Figure 2.
The day of HO-BSI onset differed by organism (Figure 3): E. coli, S. aureus and S. pneumoniae were early HO-BSI events (median time from admission to infection 9–12 days), whereas K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Enterococci and A. baumannii were late BSI events (median time from admission to infection 16–20 days).
The distribution of organisms according to the week of HO-BSI onset and proportion of AMR organisms is presented in Table 3. As the day of onset increased, E. coli and S. aureus accounted for a lower proportion of HO-BSI, and the proportion of HO-BSI caused by AMR organisms increased (Table 3 and Figure 4).

3.3. Mortality

Data on mortality are presented in Table 4. Survival data were available for 5907 (87.5%) events (845 events were excluded from this analysis due to invalid or missing UID), and 1-year survival data were available for 3839 (56.9%) events. The overall 14-day mortality was 30.6% (95% CI: 28.5–32.8%), 30-day mortality was 40.2% (95% CI: 38.2–42.1%) and 1-year mortality was 66.5% (95%: CI 64.7–68.3%). At all three time points, mortality was highest for A. baumannii BSI and lowest for E. coli BSI, and higher for HO-BSI caused by AMR organisms as compared to susceptible organisms. Short-term mortality (14-day and 30-day) did not vary significantly by hospital bed size; however, 1-year mortality was higher in hospitals with fewer than 300 beds as compared to larger hospitals.
Multivariable analysis of risk factors for death within 30 days among patients with HO-BSI is presented in Table 4. In univariate analysis, hospital size was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality and therefore was excluded from the multivariable model. The highest risk organisms (as compared to E. coli) were A. baumannii (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.85; 95% CI: 2.3–3.55), E. faecium (aOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.66–2.79) and S. pneumoniae (aOR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.21–4.59). When two or more sentinel organisms were isolated within 5 days, these HO-BSI events were associated with 34% increased odds of mortality (aOR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.17–1.53). HO-BSI caused by AMR isolates had nearly 60% increased odds of mortality (aOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.4–1.77). As compared to medical wards, mortality in surgical wards was lower (aOR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.29–0.4), and mortality in ICU was slightly higher (aOR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.07–1.45). There was no significant association between length of hospitalization before onset of HO-BSI and mortality.

4. Discussion

In this study, HO-BSI caused by eight sentinel bacteria occurred in 0.28% of admissions and 0.87% of admissions with LOS greater than three days. Mortality after these HO-BSI events was high: 14-day, 30-day and 1-year mortality were 30.6%, 40.2% and 66.5%, respectively. Over 44% of HO-BSIs with sentinel bacteria were caused by AMR organisms.
In a systematic review by Goto et al. [4], the IR of HO-BSI was 6 per 1000 admissions in the USA; 2.7 per 1000 admissions in France; 3.5 per 1000 admissions in England; 8.4 per 1000 admissions in Spain and 2.7 per 1000 admissions in Finland. Our study included only eight sentinel bacteria; we cannot directly compare the IR to other studies. However, based on unpublished data from the NIARIC on BSI caused by all organisms during 3 months in 2019, we estimated that these eight bacteria account for 70% of all HO-BSIs (not including bacteria classified as skin contaminants [12]). Thus, we estimate that the overall IR of HO-BSI in Israel in adult patients is likely close to 4 per 1000 admissions.
Goto et al. [4] estimated that the CFR for HO-BSIs was between 15–30% in the USA and between 12–32% in Europe. However, most studies included in their analysis reported on in-hospital mortality, which underestimates the true CFR, as some patients die at home or at a post-acute-care facility soon after discharge. Since mortality data in our study came from the national death registry, we avoided this limitation.
In a study by Wisplinghoff et al. [13], the time from hospital admission to infection varied by infecting organism: 13 days for E. coli, 16 days for S. aureus, 22 days for Klebsiella species and 26 days for Acinetobacter species. We found similar results: S. pneumoniae, E. coli and S. aureus BSI were earlier events (median time from admission to HOBSI was 9–12 days), and K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and Enterococcus species BSI were later events (median time from admission to infection was 16–20 days). The high frequency of BSI caused by E. coli and S. aureus, pathogens common in the community, may also reflect misclassification of these infections as hospital-onset; they may have begun before hospital admission but diagnosed late because of a delay in taking blood cultures. In the case of E. coli, BSI early in hospitalization could also reflect translocation of the patient’s own flora following invasive procedures or devices. In contrast, pathogens such as A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa are nosocomially acquired and thus cause BSI later in the course of hospitalization.
In a study by Leibovici et al. [14], there was a positive linear relationship between the proportion of BSI caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms and the day of BSI onset, with no specific threshold during the first 3 weeks of hospitalization. Our study had similar findings, with increased resistance among all sentinel organisms as day of hospitalization progressed. In a study by Kadri et al. [8], patients with BSI caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms were nine times more likely to receive inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment than those with BSI caused by antibiotic-susceptible organisms. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment increased the odds of in-hospital mortality by 46%. Similar findings were found by Leibovici et al. [15] and in the ICU setting by Ibrahim et al. [16]. We did not have data on antibiotic treatment, but our finding of nearly 60% higher 30-day mortality following HO-BSI events caused by AMR isolates may reflect, at least in part, delayed or less effective therapy.
Often surveillance systems are confined to selected university or tertiary care hospitals that admit complex cases, which may cause referral bias [5]. Our study encompassed all acute care hospitals in Israel, thus avoiding selection bias, and provided data on nationwide incidence. As expected, incidence was twice as high in large tertiary care hospitals as compared to smaller hospitals (3.4 vs. 1.6 per 1000 admissions), reflecting the difference in case mix. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in 14-day and 30-day mortality by hospital size.
In a population-based cohort study from Denmark [17], mortality following BSI was significantly higher compared to controls without a BSI after adjusting for age and sex: 30-day mortality was 22% vs. 0.2%, 1-year mortality was 41.4% vs. 2.6% and 5-year mortality was 63.0% vs. 16.8%. In a study by Prescott et al. [18], sepsis was associated with a 22% increase in late mortality (>30 days and up to two years), compared with matched non-hospitalized adult controls. Leibovici et al. [19] found that long-term survival of patients was influenced by the severity of the original infection and the appropriateness of treatment. Indeed, we found high 1-year mortality for patients following HO-BSI.
Goto et al. [4] estimated that BSI is among the top seven causes of death in middle- and high-income countries and contributes to more deaths than any other infection. Despite this observation, the subject has received little attention, national data are scarce and there are no mortality estimates from the past decade. Population-based BSI surveillance systems have been recommended for years [5,20], but implementation is lagging. Monitoring HO-BSI is important to assess the impact of specific pathogens and antibiotic resistance, as well as to assess the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Furthermore, in recent decades, most surveillance and infection control attention has focused on preventing device-related infections, primarily central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). We found that most HO-BSIs (86%) were acquired outside of the ICU, and 67% of events were acquired in medical wards. Thus, attention should be shifted beyond device-associated BSI, and specific interventions are required outside of the ICU, especially in medical wards.
It is estimated that at least 50% of HO-BSIs are preventable with adequate infection control measures [21]. For instance, in England, the introduction of national guidelines for prevention of HAIs and mandatory surveillance and reporting of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSI in 2001 led to an 80% reduction in MRSA infection rates [22]. Compliance with CLABSI bundles has decreased CLABSI rates by 33% in the USA [23]. Targeted infection control interventions have led to a reduction in ICU CLABSI rates in Israeli hospitals over the last decade from 7.4 to 2.3 events per 1000 central-line days [24]. Furthermore, improving sepsis care, rapid diagnosis and antimicrobial stewardship programs decrease mortality in patients with HO-BSI [25,26].
The strengths of this study include the nationwide sample and the use of a national death registry that enabled accurate tracking of deaths after hospital discharge. Our surveillance system encompasses all Israeli hospitals, of varying bed size and academic affiliations, thus representing a large case mix.
This study had several limitations. The detection of BSI depends on adequate practices such as timing, volume of blood drawn and number of culture sets, as well as physicians’ threshold to order a blood culture [5]. Since our surveillance data included only positive blood cultures, we did not evaluate the total number of blood cultures obtained and diagnostic variation between hospitals. Laboratory surveillance may overestimate HO-BSI rates, as detection of bacteremia in the first few days may reflect delayed detection of community-acquired BSI and not true HO-BSI. As we lacked clinical data, the mortality data presented here represent all-cause mortality and not infection-related mortality. Survival data were not available for all patients; however, we do not think this should bias our estimate of mortality.
In conclusion, this nationwide study highlights the incidence of HO-BSI in Israel from eight sentinel bacteria, the associated high mortality and important role of antibiotic resistance, and can serve to direct efforts and resources for HO-BSI prevention and treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10051009/s1, Table S1. STROBE Statement.

Author Contributions

A.N., E.T., S.F.F. and Y.C. conceptualized the study; A.N. collected the data; A.N. and L.W. analyzed the data; L.W. prepared the visualizations of the data; A.N., E.T., S.F.F., V.S., M.J.S. and Y.C. interpreted the results; A.N. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; A.N., E.T. and Y.C. prepared the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the jurisdictional IRB, reference #TLV-0307-21.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived for this analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dikla Biran and Michal Ish-Shalom for software support and data curation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaye, K.S.; Marchaim, D.; Chen, T.Y.; Baures, T.; Anderson, D.J.; Choi, Y.; Sloane, R.; Schmader, K.E. Effect of nosocomial bloodstream infections on mortality, length of stay, and hospital costs in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vrijens, F.; Hulstaert, F.; Van de Sande, S.; Devriese, S.; Morales, I.; Parmentier, Y. Hospital-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections: Linking national surveillance data to clinical and financial hospital data to estimate increased length of stay and healthcare costs. J. Hosp. Infect. 2010, 75, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suetens, C.; Latour, K.; Kärki, T.; Ricchizzi, E.; Kinross, P.; Moro, M.L.; Jans, B.; Hopkins, S.; Hansen, S.; Lyytikäinen, O.; et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: Results from two european point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 1800516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Goto, M.; Al-Hasan, M.N. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Søgaard, M.; Lyytikäinen, O.; Laupland, K.B.; Schønheyder, H.C. Monitoring the epidemiology of bloodstream infections: Aims, methods and importance. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. ECDC European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2015. In Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net); ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Solna, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kadri, S.S.; Lai, Y.L.; Warner, S.; Strich, J.R.; Babiker, A.; Ricotta, E.E.; Demirkale, C.Y.; Dekker, J.P.; Palmore, T.N.; Rhee, C.; et al. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections based on discordant in-vitro susceptibilities: A retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and mortality risk in US hospitals. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ministry of Health Israel Inpatient Institutions and Day Hospital Units in Israel 2018, Part I: Hospitalization Trends; Ministry of Health: Jerusalem, Israel, 2020.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multidrug-Resistant Organism & Clostridioides Difficile (MDRO/CDI) Infection Surveillance and LabID Event Reporting Module 2021; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022.
  11. Tacconelli, E.; Magrini, N.; Carmeli, Y.; Harbarth, S.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Mendelson, M.; Pulcini, C.; Singh, N.; Theuretzbacher, U. WHO Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery and Development of New Antibiotics; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  12. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NHSN Organisms List. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/xls/2018-NHSN-Organisms-List-Validation.xlsx (accessed on 1 May 2020).
  13. Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in US Hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 Cases from a Prospective Nationwide Surveillance Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Leibovici, L.; Schønheyder, H.; Pitlik, S.D.; Samra, Z.; Møller, J.K. Bacteraemia caused by hospital-type micro-organisms during hospital stay. J. Hosp. Infect. 2000, 44, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Leibovici, L.; Shraga, I.; Drucker, M.; Konigsberger, H.; Samra, Z.; Pitlik, S.D. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J. Intern. Med. 1998, 244, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ibrahim, E.H.; Sherman, G.; Ward, S.; Fraser, V.J.; Kollef, M.H. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 2000, 118, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Nielsen, S.L.; Lassen, A.T.; Gradel, K.O.; Jensen, T.G.; Kolmos, H.J.; Hallas, J.; Pedersen, C. Bacteremia is associated with excess long-term mortality: A 12-year population-based cohort study. J. Infect. 2015, 70, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Prescott, H.C.; Osterholzer, J.J.; Langa, K.M.; Angus, D.C.; Iwashyna, T.J. Late mortality after sepsis: Propensity matched cohort study. BMJ 2016, 353, i2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Leibovici, L. Long-term consequences of severe infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Laupland, K.B. Incidence of bloodstream infection: A review of population-based studies. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. World Health Organization. Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  22. Duerden, B.; Fry, C.; Johnson, A.P.; Wilcox, M.H. The control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus blood stream infections in England. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Furuya, E.Y.; Dick, A.W.; Herzig, C.T.A.; Pogorzelska-Maziarz, M.; Larson, E.L.; Stone, P.W. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Reduction and Bundle Compliance in Intensive Care Units: A National Study. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016, 37, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ministry of Health Israel Summary of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Bacteremia, 2019; Ministry of Health: Jerusalem, Israel, 2020.
  25. Timbrook, T.T.; Morton, J.B.; Mcconeghy, K.W.; Caffrey, A.R.; Mylonakis, E.; LaPlante, K.L. The effect of molecular rapid diagnostic testing on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Baghdadi, J.D.; Brook, R.H.; Uslan, D.Z.; Needleman, J.; Bell, D.S.; Cunningham, W.E.; Wong, M.D. Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management with Mortality among Patients with Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Incidence (bars) and cumulative incidence (line) of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria, by hospital day of onset.
Figure 1. Incidence (bars) and cumulative incidence (line) of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria, by hospital day of onset.
Microorganisms 10 01009 g001
Figure 2. Number of sentinel bacteria hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs), by hospital day of onset and organism.
Figure 2. Number of sentinel bacteria hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs), by hospital day of onset and organism.
Microorganisms 10 01009 g002
Figure 3. Days from admission to hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset, by organism. Square—median; whiskers—interquartile range.
Figure 3. Days from admission to hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset, by organism. Square—median; whiskers—interquartile range.
Microorganisms 10 01009 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of sentinel organisms and percentage of antimicrobial-resistant isolates a, by day of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset. a Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (third and fourth generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Figure 4. Distribution of sentinel organisms and percentage of antimicrobial-resistant isolates a, by day of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset. a Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (third and fourth generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Microorganisms 10 01009 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
Table 1. Characteristics of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
CharacteristicsN = 6752
Female sex, n (%)2874(42.6)
Age, mean (±SD)68.5(±16.3)
Days from admission to bacteremia, median (IQR)15(8–29)
Hospital size (beds), n (%)
<300673(10)
300–7002393(35.4)
>7003686(54.6)
Department at onset, n (%)
Medical4533(67.1)
ICU943(14)
Surgical1184(17.5)
Not reported92(1.4)
Organism, n (%)
Escherichia coli1491(19.8)
Klebsiella pneumoniae1659(22.1)
Staphylococcus aureus1315(17.5)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1175(15.6)
Enterococcus faecalis778(10.4)
Enterococcus faecium405(5.4)
Acinetobacter baumannii654(8.7)
Streptococcus pneumoniae43(0.6)
Events with ≥2 sentinel organisms isolated within 5 days, n (%)675(10)
Events with antimicrobial resistant organisms a, n (%)2984(44.2)
a Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (third and fourth generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Table 2. Incidence rates of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
Table 2. Incidence rates of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
CategorynBSI per 1000 Admissions
(95% CI)
BSI per 1000 Admissions at Risk a
(95% CI)
BSI per 10,000 Patient-Days
(95% CI)
BSI per 10,000 Patient-Days at Risk b
(95% CI)
All events67522.84(2.77–2.91)8.66(8.45–8.86)6.88(6.72–7.05)9.63(6.72–7.05)
Hospital day of onset4–715281.96(1.86–2.06)Not calculated
(denominator data not available)
2.18(2.07–2.29)Not calculated
(denominator data not available)
8–1417936.84(6.53–7.16)4.06(3.87–4.25)
≥15343135.04(33.89–36.19)12.43(12.01–12.84)
Hospital size (beds)<3006731.61(1.49–1.73)5.66(5.23-6.08)4.64(4.29–4.99)7.31(4.29–4.99)
300–70023932.71(2.6–2.81)7.96(7.64-8.28)6.61(6.34–6.87)9.25(6.34–6.87)
>70036863.43(3.32–3.55)10.23(9.9–10.56)7.78(7.53–8.03)10.53(7.53–8.03)
OrganismEscherichia coli14910.63(0.6–0.66)1.91(1.81–2.01)1.52(1.44–1.6)2.13(1.44–1.6)
Klebsiella pneumoniae16590.70(0.66–0.73)2.13(2.03–2.23)1.69(1.61–1.77)2.37(1.61–1.77)
Staphylococcus aureus13150.55(0.52–0.58)1.69(1.6–1.78)1.34(1.27–1.41)1.88(1.27–1.41)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa11750.49(0.47–0.52)1.51(1.42–1.59)1.20(1.13–1.27)1.68(1.13–1.27)
Enterococcus faecalis7780.33(0.3–0.35)1.00(0.93–1.07)0.79(0.74–0.85)1.11(0.74–0.85)
Enterococcus faecium4050.17(0.15–0.19)0.52(0.47–0.57)0.41(0.37–0.45)0.58(0.37–0.45)
Acinetobacter baumannii6540.28(0.25–0.3)0.84(0.77–0.9)0.67(0.62–0.72)0.93(0.62–0.72)
Streptococcus pneumoniae430.02(0.01–0.02)0.06(0.04–0.07)0.04(0.03–0.06)0.06(0.03–0.06)
Events with antimicrobial resistant organisms c29841.26(1.21–1.3)3.83(3.69–3.96)3.04(2.93–3.15)4.26(2.93–3.15)
a Admissions at risk were defined as admissions lasting at least 4 days. b Patient-days at risk were defined as patient-days counts beginning on hospital day 4. c Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (3rd and 4th generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Table 3. Distribution of sentinel organisms by week of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) status a.
Table 3. Distribution of sentinel organisms by week of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HO-BSI) onset, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) status a.
OrganismWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4+
% of Total % AMR% of Total% AMR% of Total% AMR% of Total% AMR
Escherichia coli25.0941.3921.6839.3921.1747.7714.6650.63
Klebsiella pneumoniae17.1756.2922.4958.8819.7967.9725.7472.02
Staphylococcus aureus24.7921.3118.2434.3515.4251.1113.3360.66
Pseudomonas aeruginosa11.4612.0413.8512.4116.8014.2918.9826.46
Enterococcus faecalis10.6209.550.539.51011.120
Enterococcus faecium2.9414.294.5020.226.6811.546.9821.69
Acinetobacter baumannii6.8471.939.1585.0810.3786.788.7989.92
Streptococcus pneumoniae1.0800.5600.2600.410
a Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (3rd and 4th generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Table 4. Mortality (all cause) following hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
Table 4. Mortality (all cause) following hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) caused by sentinel bacteria among adult patients, Israel, 2018–2019.
CategoryN a14-Day Mortality % (95% CI)30-Day Mortality % (95% CI)N a1-Year Mortality % (95% CI)Adjusted b OR for Death within 30 Days (95% CI)
All events 590730.6(28.5–32.75)40.2(38.18–42.13)383966.5(64.67–68.33)
SexMale333731.2(28.35–33.98)41.2(38.57–43.78)216466.9(64.49–69.34)1.1 (0.99–1.22)
Female254329.8(26.55–33.06)38.7(35.65–41.74)164865.9(63.08–68.72)Reference
Age (years)18–4452814.2(6.3–22.11)19.9(12.25–27.52)34739.5(31.3–47.67)
45–64138524.8(20.27–29.4)33.3(28.98–37.59)87958.6(54.34–62.84)
65–79228530.7(27.26–34.09)39.9(36.69–43.05)148966.8(63.83–69.68)
≥80170940.3(36.65–43.98)52.4(49.1–55.64)112480.7(78.13–83.26)
Age, as continuous variable 1.03 (1.02–1.03)
Hospital day of onset4–7136227.4(22.86–31.91)35.9(31.65–40.16)89856.7(52.38–60.99)Reference
8–14157731.1(27.04–35.23)39.7(35.86–43.53)99865.5(61.89–69.17)
≥15296831.8(28.87–34.81)42.4(39.62–45.08)194371.5(69.17–73.91)1.1 (0.99–1.23)
Hospital size (beds)<30058832.3(25.66–38.96)42.0(35.85–48.16)37572.3(66.94–77.6)Non-significant b
300–700178030.4(26.58–34.32)39.8(36.17–43.38)116266.7(63.38–70.01)
>700353930.4(27.68–33.18)40.0(37.49–42.59)230265.5(63.06–67.87)
DepartmentMedical402833.8(31.25–36.28)44.4(42.06–46.67)267272.8(70.85–74.81)Reference
ICU81636.2(30.67–41.63)45.5(40.4–50.53)52664.1(58.95–69.19)1.24 (1.07–1.45)
Surgical105614.6(9.01–20.16)20.3(14.88–25.65)63442.6(36.69–48.48)0.34 (0.29–0.4)
OrganismEscherichia coli128023.3(18.48–28.08)32.0(27.51–36.55)79456.2(51.57–60.78)Reference
Klebsiella pneumoniae140328.6(24.16–33)38.6(34.53–42.73)88068.2(64.45–71.91)1.14 (0.96–1.35)
Staphylococcus aureus117130.0(25.18–34.77)40.2(35.79–44.65)77465.0(60.82–69.16)1.29 (1.08–1.53)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa104331.1(26.03-36.1)39.8(35.08–44.5)70467.0(62.8–71.29)1.42 (1.18–1.71)
Enterococcus faecalis69529.4(23.1–35.6)41.0(35.3–46.72)45073.3(68.56–78.1)1.42 (1.16–1.75)
Enterococcus faecium34038.2(29.88–46.59)50.6(43.12–58.06)21674.1(67.28–80.86)2.16 (1.66–2.79)
Acinetobacter baumannii60555.2(49.87–60.54)64.6(59.89–69.37)42583.1(79.15–86.97)2.85 (2.3–3.55)
Streptococcus pneumoniae3842.1(17.91–66.3)50.0(27.52–72.48)2864.3(42.15–86.42)2.36 (1.21–4.59)
Events with ≥2 sentinel organisms isolated within 5 daysNo531830.0(27.74–32.24)39.3(37.19–41.38)345365.7(63.76–67.66)Reference
Yes58936.3(29.89–42.78)48.0(42.23–53.87)38673.6(68.45-78.7)1.34 (1.17–1.53)
Events with antimicrobial resistant organisms cNo333825.3(22.35–28.22)34.1(31.34–36.85)213259.3(56.58–62)Reference
Yes256937.6(34.51–40.62)48.0(45.25–50.82)170775.5(73.17–77.86)1.57 (1.4–1.77)
a The number of events in each category does not add up to the total number of events because of missing data. b Multivariable model adjusting for age, sex, day of HO-BSI onset, department, organism, events with ≥2 sentinel organisms and events with antimicrobial resistant organisms. Hospital size was non-significant in univariate analysis and therefore was excluded from the model. c Defined as resistance to key antimicrobial agents: penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae; oxacillin or cefoxitin resistance in S. aureus; vancomycin or teicoplanin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium; extended-spectrum cephalosporin (3rd and 4th generation) resistance in E. coli and K. pneumonia and non-susceptibility to imipenem or meropenem in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nutman, A.; Wullfhart, L.; Temkin, E.; Feldman, S.F.; Schechner, V.; Schwaber, M.J.; Carmeli, Y. Hospital-Onset Bloodstream Infections Caused by Eight Sentinel Bacteria: A Nationwide Study in Israel, 2018–2019. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051009

AMA Style

Nutman A, Wullfhart L, Temkin E, Feldman SF, Schechner V, Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. Hospital-Onset Bloodstream Infections Caused by Eight Sentinel Bacteria: A Nationwide Study in Israel, 2018–2019. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nutman, Amir, Liat Wullfhart, Elizabeth Temkin, Sarah F. Feldman, Vered Schechner, Mitchell J. Schwaber, and Yehuda Carmeli. 2022. "Hospital-Onset Bloodstream Infections Caused by Eight Sentinel Bacteria: A Nationwide Study in Israel, 2018–2019" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop