Correction: Boschman, Robert, and Bill Bunn. 2018. Nuclear Avenue: “Cyclonic Development”, Abandonment, and Relations in Uranium City, Canada. Humanities 7: 5

The authors wish to make the following correction to the paper published in Humanities (Boschman and Bunn 2018). Three references in this article are made to Treaty 10 (1906); these should be references to Treaty 8 (1899).

On p. 17 “The last sentence especially points to the inadequacy of the cyclonic development metaphor to categorize, explain, or represent the suffering of Indigenous peoples because of decisions undertaken by settler peoples and their organizations—corporate and governmental—to find and extract uranium on the traditional lands that fall under Treaty 10 (1906) north of Lake Athabasca (a treaty which directly addresses issues such as mining and First Nations consent [http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028874/1100100028906])”. This sentence should read: “The last sentence especially points to the inadequacy of the cyclonic development metaphor to categorize, explain, or represent the suffering of Indigenous peoples because of decisions undertaken by settler peoples and their organizations—corporate and governmental—to find and extract uranium on the traditional lands that fall under Treaty 8 (1899) north of Lake Athabasca (a treaty which directly addresses issues such as mining and First Nations consent [http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028813/1100100028853])”.

On p. 19 “We acknowledge the Traditional Lands of the Dene, Métis, and Woodland Cree peoples in this Treaty 10 region about which we have undertaken research”. This sentence should read: “We acknowledge the Traditional Lands of the Dene, Métis, and Woodland Cree peoples in this Treaty 8 region about which we have undertaken research”.

On p. 20: “1906. Treaty 10. Available online: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028874/1100100028906 (accessed on 14 December 2017)”. This citation should read “Treaty 8. 1899. Available online: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028813/1100100028853 (accessed on 9 November 2018)”.

We apologize to readers of Humanities for any inconvenience. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage, with a reference to this correction.