Next Article in Journal
Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research—A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Social Justice: Disparities in Average Earnings across Portuguese Municipalities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Framing ‘Friend’: Media Framing of ‘Man’s Best Friend’ and the Pattern of Police Shootings of Dogs
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Why Would You Want a Baby When You Could Have a Dog?” Voluntarily Childless Women’s “Peternal” Feelings, Longing and Ambivalence

1
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
2
FoU Södertörn, SE-136 44 Handen, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(4), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8040126
Received: 16 March 2019 / Revised: 10 April 2019 / Accepted: 18 April 2019 / Published: 20 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue We Are Best Friends: Animals in Society)
  |  
PDF [315 KB, uploaded 23 April 2019]

Abstract

This article explores voluntarily childless women’s experiences and understandings of human-animal interactions and their attitudes towards companion animals. It draws on interviews with 15 Swedish women who expressed a lack of “maternal” feelings and therefore had remained voluntarily childless, or childfree (used here as two interchangeable concepts). Instead, the women described how they perceived the attachment bonds to companion animals that they had developed as similar to, or even superior to, the attachments bonds between parents and their children. The article thus introduces the expressions “peternal”, and “peternal feelings”, to denote these women’s attachment bonds to companion animals (primarily cats and dogs). The results, however, also illustrate that few of the women actually took on the role as “pet parent”. Although they longed to develop attachment bonds with companion animals, they were conflicted and experienced ambivalence, leading to decisions to develop avoidance strategies, resembling those involved in the childfree decision. Hence, many of them described themselves as both childfree and “petfree”. View Full-Text
Keywords: voluntary childlessness; women; pets; “peternal” voluntary childlessness; women; pets; “peternal”
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Peterson, H.; Engwall, K. “Why Would You Want a Baby When You Could Have a Dog?” Voluntarily Childless Women’s “Peternal” Feelings, Longing and Ambivalence. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 126.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top