Next Article in Journal
Gender Based Perception of Successful Construction of Project Managers’ Attributes
Previous Article in Journal
Democracy, Liberalism and the Challenge of Social Solidarity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entry and Degree Attainment in STEM: The Intersection of Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(7), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7070111

Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM

Department of Sociology, University of California—Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9430, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 May 2018 / Revised: 2 July 2018 / Accepted: 4 July 2018 / Published: 9 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [373 KB, uploaded 10 July 2018]

Abstract

Scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematical (STEM) occupations are strongholds of gender segregation in the contemporary United States. While many Americans regard this segregation as natural and inevitable, closer examination reveals a great deal of variability in the gendering of STEM fields across time, space, and demographic groups. This article assesses how different theoretical accounts accord with the available evidence on the gender composition of scientific and technical fields. We find most support for accounts that allow for a dynamic interplay between individual-level traits and the broader sociocultural environments in which they develop. The existing evidence suggests, in particular, that Western cultural stereotypes about the nature of STEM work and STEM workers and about the intrinsic qualities of men and women can be powerful drivers of individual aptitudes, aspirations, and affinities. We offer an illustrative catalog of stereotypes that support women’s STEM-avoidance and men’s STEM-affinity, and we conclude with some thoughts on policy implications. View Full-Text
Keywords: gender; STEM; segregation; stereotypes; culture; work; occupations; science; inequality gender; STEM; segregation; stereotypes; culture; work; occupations; science; inequality
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Thébaud, S.; Charles, M. Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 111.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top