Next Article in Journal
Political Approaches to Tackling Islamophobia: An ‘Insider/Outsider’ Analysis of the British Coalition Government’s Approach between 2010–15
Previous Article in Journal
It’s Not Real Until It’s on Facebook: A Qualitative Analysis of Social Media and Digital Communication among Emerging Adults in College
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(3), 76;

Livelihood after Relocation—Evidences of Guchchagram Project in Bangladesh

Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
Institute of Regional Science (IfR), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Tropical Hydrogeology and Environmental Engineering at Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 February 2017 / Revised: 30 June 2017 / Accepted: 10 July 2017 / Published: 13 July 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [1892 KB, uploaded 17 July 2017]   |  


Due to climate change and its consequences to islands and coastal countries, the relocation of the people living in those vulnerable places has received a lot of attention from policy makers as well as academicians. There have been similar kinds of programs running in Bangladesh since the country’s independence in 1971, and people who are landless or victimized due to river bank erosion, cyclones, or floods have been relocated under the umbrella program called ‘Guchchagram’, i.e., cluster villages. Different ruling parties had used different names for the project due to the financial nature of the project, but none of them have significantly differed from the overall goals and objectives of relocated settlements and the betterment of the landless and extreme event victims. Particularly, this study asks how and to what extent the livelihood of relocated households has changed, and what the potentials and constraints of the relocated settlements are. Based on an empirical study at four Guchchagrams of Gopalganj Sadar Upazila, the study shows that there is a significant improvement in the livelihood conditions of the migrated people, but the locational disadvantages and access to agricultural production, the local employment market, and some of the targeted objectives of the project have not achieved. To some extent, the rehabilitated families have similar risks as they had before; however, available agricultural lands and proper allocation can reduce such livelihood risks. View Full-Text
Keywords: relocated settlement; livelihood risks; migration; Guchchagram (GG); Bangladesh relocated settlement; livelihood risks; migration; Guchchagram (GG); Bangladesh

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mallick, B.; Sultana, Z. Livelihood after Relocation—Evidences of Guchchagram Project in Bangladesh. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 76.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top