Next Article in Journal
Promoting Military Cultural Competence among Civilian Care Providers: Learning through Program Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Perceptions of the Social Relevance of Science: Exploring the Implications for Gendered Patterns in Expectations of Majoring in STEM Fields
Previous Article in Journal
When Care and Concern Are Not Enough: School Personnel’s Development as Allies for Trans and Gender Non-Conforming Students
Previous Article in Special Issue
Planning a Career in Engineering: Parental Effects on Sons and Daughters
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Queer in STEM Organizations: Workplace Disadvantages for LGBT Employees in STEM Related Federal Agencies

Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Maria Charles and Sarah Thébaud
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(1), 12;
Received: 1 September 2016 / Revised: 22 December 2016 / Accepted: 14 January 2017 / Published: 4 February 2017
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals in U.S. workplaces often face disadvantages in pay, promotion, and inclusion and emergent research suggests that these disadvantages may be particularly pernicious within science and engineering environments. However, no research has systematically examined whether LGBT employees indeed encounter disadvantages in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) organizations. Using representative data of over 30,000 workers employed in six STEM-related federal agencies (the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), over 1000 of whom identify as LGBT, we compare the workplace experiences of LGBT employees in STEM-related federal agencies with those of their non-LGBT colleagues. Across numerous measures along two separate dimensions of workplace experiences—perceived treatment as employees and work satisfaction—LGBT employees in STEM agencies report systematically more negative workplace experiences than their non-LGBT colleagues. Exploring how these disadvantages vary by agency, supervisory status, age cohort, and gender, we find that LGBT persons have more positive experiences in regulatory agencies but that supervisory status does not improve LGBT persons’ experiences, nor do the youngest LGBT employees fare better than their older LGBT colleagues. LGBT-identifying men and women report similar workplace disadvantages. We discuss the implications of these findings for STEM organizations and STEM inequality more broadly. View Full-Text
Keywords: STEM; LGBT inequality; Federal Agencies STEM; LGBT inequality; Federal Agencies
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cech, E.A.; Pham, M.V. Queer in STEM Organizations: Workplace Disadvantages for LGBT Employees in STEM Related Federal Agencies. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop