Next Article in Journal
When Care and Concern Are Not Enough: School Personnel’s Development as Allies for Trans and Gender Non-Conforming Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Fat People of Color: Emergent Intersectional Discourse Online
Previous Article in Journal
Marriage Formation in Context: Four Decades in Comparative Perspective
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our core network, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 16:00 and 16:30 CEST on September 25th.
Article

The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016

Department of Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College, 2400 W. Chew St., Allentown, PA 18018, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Jenny L. Davis and David A. Banks
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010010
Received: 29 September 2016 / Revised: 7 January 2017 / Accepted: 12 January 2017 / Published: 20 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media, Internet and Society)
This study traces appeals to authenticity, over time, in the promotional material of leading social-networking sites (SNSs). Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the public-facing websites of major SNS platforms—beginning with Friendster in 2002—were sampled at six-month intervals, with promotional language and visuals examined for authenticity claims. The authors tracked these appeals, with attention to changes in promotional copy, through to July 2016, among the most popular social media services (as determined by English-language web presence and active monthly user figures or, when unavailable, reported network size). The study found that nearly all SNSs invoked authenticity—directly or through language like “real life” and “genuine”—in their promotional materials. What stood out was the profoundly reactive nature of these claims, with new services often defining themselves, openly or implicitly, against legacy services’ inauthenticity. A recurring marketing strategy, in other words, has been to call out competitors’ phoniness by substituting (and touting) some other, differently grounded mode of authenticity. Since the affordances of social sites, even those touting evanescence or anonymity, make them vulnerable to similar charges, the cycle gets replayed with numbing regularity. View Full-Text
Keywords: authenticity; Facebook; self; Snapchat; social media; social networking; subjectivity; Twitter authenticity; Facebook; self; Snapchat; social media; social networking; subjectivity; Twitter
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Salisbury, M.; Pooley, J.D. The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010010

AMA Style

Salisbury M, Pooley JD. The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016. Social Sciences. 2017; 6(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salisbury, Meredith, and Jefferson D. Pooley 2017. "The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016" Social Sciences 6, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010010

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop