Previous Article in Journal
The Administrative Burden Experienced by U.S. Rural Residents Accessing Social Security Administration Benefit Programs in 2024
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Factors of Workplace Procrastination: A Systematic Review

by
Iraida Musteață
and
Andrei Corneliu Holman
*
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700554 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060380
Submission received: 28 March 2025 / Revised: 8 June 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 16 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Work, Employment and the Labor Market)

Abstract

Background: Workplace procrastination is associated with a wide range of negative organizational outcomes. Our objectives are to systematically review the factors of workplace procrastination and the instruments used to measure this construct. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for papers published between 2000 and 2023 through Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Taylor & Francis, using the search terms “workplace procrastination not academic” and “employee procrastination”. Results: After screening, 33 studies were retained for analysis and were also submitted to quality assessment. The factors were grouped into two main categories, i.e., employee-related and external. Several potential factors have been investigated only in a single study, while contradictory findings have been reported regarding the effect of others, especially in culturally diverse samples. Procrastination was measured using ten different instruments, with variations in their conceptual underpinnings. Conclusions: Future advancements in understanding the factors of workplace procrastination would greatly benefit from studies on employee samples from different countries. Moreover, future research should select their workplace procrastination measures based on careful consideration of the specific facets that it aims to investigate. Our findings also suggest that addressing procrastination at work requires a comprehensive approach involving different interventions at both the organizational and individual level.
Keywords: workplace procrastination; factors of procrastination; personality; job characteristics; leadership; workload; work-life balance; time pressure; demographics; systematic review workplace procrastination; factors of procrastination; personality; job characteristics; leadership; workload; work-life balance; time pressure; demographics; systematic review

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Musteață, I.; Holman, A.C. Factors of Workplace Procrastination: A Systematic Review. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060380

AMA Style

Musteață I, Holman AC. Factors of Workplace Procrastination: A Systematic Review. Social Sciences. 2025; 14(6):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Musteață, Iraida, and Andrei Corneliu Holman. 2025. "Factors of Workplace Procrastination: A Systematic Review" Social Sciences 14, no. 6: 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060380

APA Style

Musteață, I., & Holman, A. C. (2025). Factors of Workplace Procrastination: A Systematic Review. Social Sciences, 14(6), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop