Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media: Tabloidisation and Information Gap to Attract Audiences
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Expansion and Consequences of Clickbait: Erosion of Trust and Degradation of Information Quality
2. Materials and Methods
- C1. Identification of the unit of analysis. Media and information section to which it belongs (Front Page, Most Read, Most Viral).
- C2. Type of clickbait. Conduct a breakdown analysis of clickbait strategies based on the taxonomic proposal by Bazaco et al. (2019) and Diez-Gracia and Sánchez-García (2022), who identified two types of techniques from the preceding literature: those that manipulate the headline by omitting relevant data or creating an information gap, emphasise the importance of the protagonist, exaggerate claims or are attention-grabbing, etc.; and those that use tabloidisation techniques, soft strategies or striking multimedia resources.
- C3. Topic and journalistic genre. This category encodes which topic(s) on the journalistic agenda the identified clickbait content corresponds to, and which journalistic genre it falls into (informative, interpretive, opinion, etc.)
3. Results
3.1. Clickbait in the Media: Prevalence in Front Pages and Reach to Multi-Platform Audiences
3.2. Type of Clickbait in General Digital Media and Audiences
3.3. The Spread of Clickbait into Hard News and Information Treatment
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Agrawal, Amol. 2016. Clickbait detection using deep learning. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT’16), Dehradun, India, October 14–16; pp. 268–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AIMC Asociación para la Investigación de Medios de Comunicación. 2022. Estudio General de Medios [General Media Study], 2a Ola Abril/Mayo. Available online: https://www.aimc.es/blog/entrega-resultados-egm-2a-ola-2022/ (accessed on 14 April 2024).
- Bardin, Laurence. 1986. Análisis de contenido. Akal. [Google Scholar]
- Bazaco, Ángela, Marta Redondo, and Pilar Sánchez-García. 2019. Clickbait as a strategy of viral journalism: Conceptualization and methods. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 74: 94–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boczkowski, Pablo, and Eugenia Mitchelstein. 2013. The News Gap. When The Preferences of the Media and the Public Diverge. Cambridge: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Bravo Araujo, Andrea, Javier Serrano-Puche, and María Fernanda Novoa-Jaso. 2021. Uso del clickbait en los medios nativos digitales españoles. Un análisis de El Confidencial, El Español, eldiario.es y Ok Diario. Dígitos 7: 185–210. Available online: https://revistadigitos.com/index.php/digitos/article/view/184 (accessed on 14 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Bright, Jonathan. 2016. The social news gap: How news reading and news sharing diverge. Journal of Communication 66: 343–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castells, Manuel. 2009. Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. [Google Scholar]
- Castells-Fos, Llúcia, Carles Pont-Sorribes, and Lluís Codina. 2022. La sostenibilidad de los medios a través de los conceptos de engagement y relevancia: Scoping review. Doxa 35: 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, Abhijnan, Bhargavi Paranjape, Sourya Kakarla, and Niloy Ganguly. 2016. Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media [sesión de conferencia]. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Media Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), San Francisco, CA, USA, August 18–21; Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7752207 (accessed on 14 April 2024).
- Chen, Yimin, Nadia Conroy, and Victoria Rubin. 2015. Misleading online content: Recognizing clickbait as “false news”. Paper presented at the Conferencia ACM WMDD, Seattle, WA, USA, November 9; Available online: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2823465.2823467 (accessed on 3 April 2024).
- Dafonte-Gómez, Alberto, María Isabel Míguez-González, and Xabier Martínez-Rolán. 2022. Los fact-checkers iberoamericanos frente a la COVID-19. Análisis de actividad en Facebook [The Ibero-American fact-checkers facing the COVID-19. Analysis of activity on Facebook]. Observatorio 16: 160–82. Available online: https://obs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/view/1823/pdf (accessed on 3 April 2024).
- De la Torre, Lidia, and María Teresa Téramo. 2015. La calidad de la información periodística: Estrategias para su observación: Coincidencias y divergencias entre los medios y el público [Journalistic quality: Strategies for observation. Coincidences and divergences between media and audience]. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 21: 135–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diez-Gracia, Alba, and Pilar Sánchez-García. 2022. The news gap in the “triple digital agenda”: The different interests of media, audience and networks. Communication & Society 35: 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echeverría, Martín. 2017. Journalistic infotainment in election coverage. The case of presidential debates. Convergencia 74: 113–36. Available online: https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/conver/v24n74/2448-5799-conver-24-74-113.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Fisher, Caroline, Eileen Culloty, Jee Young Lee, and Sora Park. 2019. Regaining control citizens who follow politicians on social media and their perceptions of journalism. Digital Journalism 7: 230–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores-Vivar, Jesús Miguel, and Ana María Zaharía. 2022. La praxis del clickbait y de The Trust Project: Riesgos y retos en los diarios digitales españoles [The praxis of clickbait and The Trust Project: Risks and challenges for Spanish digital newspapers]. Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, n. Extra, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Beaudoux, Virginia, and Ana Slimovich. 2019. Información dura-pública y blanda-privada publicada por candidatos y candidatas en Instagram durante la campaña electoral en Argentina 2019 [Hard-public information and soft-private information posted by candidates on instagram during the 2019 Argentinian electoral campaign]. Perspectivas de la Comunicación 14: 11–48. Available online: https://acortar.link/sMnRuC (accessed on 3 April 2024).
- García-Orosa, Berta, Santiago Gallur-Santorun, and Xosé López-García. 2017. Use of clickbait in the online news media of the 28 EU member countries. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 72: 1.261–1.277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García Serrano, Jesús, Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, and Ángel Hernando Gómez. 2019. Análisis del clickbaiting en los titulares de la prensa española contemporánea. Estudio de caso: Diario El País en Facebook [Analysis of clickbaiting in contemporary Spanish press headlines/A case study: El País on Facebook]. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 25: 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayle, Damien. 2021. Guardian most widely used newspaper website and app for news, says Ofcom. The Guardian, July 28. Available online: https://acortar.link/tF0SDN (accessed on 29 March 2022).
- Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Brian Weeks, and Alberto Ardèvol-Abreu. 2017. Effects of the news-find-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22: 105–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groot, Tim, and Irene Costera. 2018. What clicks actually mean: Exploring digital news user practices. Journalism 19: 668–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez Martín, Alfonso, and Alba Torrego González. 2018. Educación mediática «aumentada» para la interacción y participación en entornos virtuales. Análisis de una comunidad de Pokémon Go en YouTube [“Augmented” media education for interaction and participation in virtual environments. The study of a Pokemon Go YouTube channel]. Index Comunicación 8: 129–50. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6459842 (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Jodłowiec, María. 2022. Deceptive clickbaits in the relevance-theoretic lens: What makes them similar to punchlines. Pragmatics 33: 418–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushal, Vivek, and Kavita Vemuri. 2021. Clickbait—Trust and credibility of digital news. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 2: 146–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lischka, Juliane A., and Marcel Garz. 2021. Clickbait news and algorithmic curation: A game theory framework of the relation between journalism, users, and platforms. New Media & Society 25: 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majstorovic, Dunja. 2021. ¿Una nueva disputa ética? Frecuencia y características del clickbait en titulares en el periodismo digital de Croacia [A new ethical dispute? Frequency and characteristics of clickbait in headlines in Croatian digital journalism]. In Comunicando lo esencial en la esfera pública: La Ética y la Deontología como garantía de la función social de los Media y sus profesionales [Communicating the essentials in the public sphere: Ethics and Deontology as a guarantee of the social function of the Media and its professionals]. Edited by Elena Real Rodríguez. Madrid: Fragua, pp. 377–97. [Google Scholar]
- Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna. 2013. Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse & Communication 7: 173–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont’Alverne, Camila, Sumitra Badrinathan, Amy Ross Arguedas, Benjamin Toff, Richard Fletcher, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2022. The Trust Gap: How and Why News on Digital Platforms Is Viewed More Sceptically versus News in General. Oxford: Reuters Institute. Available online: https://lc.cx/67RZUY (accessed on 17 January 2024).
- Munger, Kevin, Mario Luca, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua Tucker. 2018. The Effect of Clickbait. Available online: https://csdp.princeton.edu/sites/csdp/files/media/munger_clickbait_10182018.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2024).
- Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andi, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2021. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Oxford: Reuters Institute. Available online: https://acortar.link/TvW7gs (accessed on 14 April 2024).
- Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute. Available online: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/digital-news-report-2018.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Craig Robertson, Kirsten Eddy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2022. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. Oxford: University of Oxford. Available online: https://acortar.link/wWOADe (accessed on 14 April 2024).
- Nordenson, Bree. 2009. ¡Sobrecarga! La batalla por la importancia del periodismo en la época del exceso de información [Overload! The battle for the importance of journalism in the age of information overload]. In El fin de los periódicos. Crisis y retos del periodismo actual [The End of Newspapers. Crisis and Challenges of Journalism Today]. Edited by Arcadi Espada and Ernesto Hernández Busto. Barcelona: Duomo Ediciones, pp. 79–99. [Google Scholar]
- Palau-Sampio, Dolors. 2016. Reference press metamorphosis in the digiatl contexto: Clickbait and tabloid strategies in Elpais.com. Communication & Society 29: 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palau-Sampio, Dolors. 2022. Pseudo-media disinformation patterns: Polarised discourse, clickbait and twisted journalistic mimicry. Journalism Practice 17: 2140–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, Itishree, Jyoti Prakash Singh, Gayadhar Pradhan, and Khushi Kumari. 2024. A deep learning framework for clickbait spoiler generation and type identification. Journal of Computational Social Science 7: 671–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña Salas, Juan Pablo. 2020. Clickbait and its influence on modification of the structure of the news in Peru. Correspondencia & Análisis 12: 294–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perreault, Gregory, and Patrick Ferrucci. 2020. What is digital journalism? Defining the practice and role of the digital journalist. Digital Journalism 8: 1298–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson-Salahuddin, Chelsea, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2020. Negotiated autonomy: The role of social media algorithms in editorial decision making. Media and Communication 7: 27–28. Available online: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10175590 (accessed on 4 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Piñuel, José Luis. 2002. Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido [Epistemology, methodology and techniques of content analysis]. Estudios de Sociolingüística 3: 1–42. Available online: https://bit.ly/36VDxdS (accessed on 4 April 2024).
- Potthast, Martin, Sebastian Köpsel, Bennos Stein, and Matthias Hagen. 2016. Clickbait detection. In Advances in Information Retrieval. Edited by Nicola Ferro, Fabio Crestani, Marie-Francine Moens, Josiane Mothe, Fabrizio Silvestri, Giorgio Maria Nunzio, Claudia Hauff and Gianmaria Silvello. ECIR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, vol. 9626, pp. 810–17. [Google Scholar]
- Riffe, Daniel, Charles F. Aust, and Stephen R. Lacy. 1993. The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly 70: 133–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robles-Ávila, Sara. 2019. Clickbait: La manipulación en la Red [Clickbait: Manipulation on the net]. In Comunicación mediada por ordenador: La lengua, el discurso y la imagen [Computer-Mediated Communication: Language, Discourse and Image]. Edited by Sara Robles-Ávila y Antonio Moreno Ortiz. Madrid: Cátedra, pp. 260–93. [Google Scholar]
- Rosique-Cedillo, Gloria, and Alejandro Barranquero-Carretero. 2015. Periodismo lento (slow journalism) en la era de la inmediatez. Experiencias en Iberoamérica [Slow journalism in the immediacy era. experiences in ibero-america]. El Profesional de la Información 24: 451–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salaverría, Ramón. 2015. Periodismo en 2014: Balance y tendencias [Journalism in 2014: Balance and trends]. Cuadernos de Periodistas 29: 9–22. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Sobradillo, Iris, and Alba Diez-Gracia. 2023. Meta-investigación del clickbait: Revisión bibliográfica del titular gancho [Meta-research on clickbait: Literature review of the headline hook]. In Acciones y reacciones ante la manipulación social: Redes, publicidad y marketing [Actions and Reactions to Social Manipulation: Networks, Advertising and Marketing]. Edited by Irene Baena-Cuder, Dolores Rando Cueto and Sofía Otero Escudero. Madrid: Dykinson, pp. 720–42. [Google Scholar]
- Sarasqueta, Gonzalo. 2021. Técnicas de la comunicación política ante la era de la infoxicación y la interrupción: Del storytelling al storydoing [Techniques of political communication in the era of infoxication and interruption: From storytelling to storydoing]. Comunicación y Hombre 17: 73–84. Available online: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/11379 (accessed on 2 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Scacco, Joshua, and Ashley Muddiman. 2020. The curiosity effect: Information seeking in the contemporary news environment. New Media & Society 22: 429–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, Kate. 2023. ‘Deceptive’ clickbait headlines: Relevance, intentions and lies. Journal of Pragmatics 218: 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiang, Lim, and Sharon Wilson. 2024. Unravelling clickbait news as viral journalism in Malaysia: Its phenomeon and impacts. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research 16: 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stemler, Steven. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7: 1–6. Available online: https://bit.ly/37BFVIP (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Swart, Joëlle. 2021. Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Social Media + Society 7: 200–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valhondo Crego, José Luis, and Salomé Berrocal Gonzalo. 2020. Desregulación y soberanía del público en la television Española: El infoentretenimiento como alternativa al modelo de noticias clásico [Deregulation and sovereignty of the public in Spanish TV: Infotainment as an alternative to the classical news model]. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 26: 851–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanda, Judith Flora, Baraka Samson Chipanjilo, Gregory Gondwe, and Joseph Kerunga. 2021. ‘Clickbait-style’ headlines and journalism credibility in Sub-Saharan Africa: Exploring audience perceptions. Journal of Media and Communication Studies 13: 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widholm, Andreas, and Ester Appelgren. 2020. A softer kind of hard news? Data journalism and the digital renewal of public service news in Sweden. New Media & Society 24: 1363–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wimmer, Roger, and Joseph Dominick. 2013. Mass Media Research. An Introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Scheme 420. | NYT | The Guardian | El País | Público |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial sample | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 |
Useful sample (with clickbait) | 174 | 90 | 133 | 119 |
Total useful sample | N = 516 |
Category | Variables |
---|---|
C1. Identification | -Media (NYT, The Guardian, El País, Público) -Information section (Front Page, Most Read, Most Viral) |
C2. Clickbait type | -Information gap. Intentional omission of the expected data, unanswered questions, use of numbers and lists, etc. -Exaggeration. Use of hyperbole or language to attract attention -Attention-grabbing language. Use of vocatives, calls for the reader’s attention -Importance of the protagonist. Use of a public personality or figure -Demand for urgency. Last-minute deadlines, updates or exclusive offers -Sensationalist delivery on social media. When clickbait or tabloidisation is found in the paratext of a tweet or post -Repetition and serialisation. Segmentation or reiteration of information -Soft news. Tabloidisation and sensationalism -Striking audiovisual elements. Demand or inclusion of videos, images or other resources that have an impact |
C3. Topic and journalistic genre | -Themes are categorised into general blocks following a cumulative coding system: politics, economy, events, wars, shootings, environment, health, curiosities, celebrities, sports, science and technology -Genre: informative, interpretive, opinion, interview, hybrid, multimedia |
NYT | The Guardian | El País | Público | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front Page | Current affairs (24.59%) | Ukrainian war (40%) | National politics (31.25%) | Economy (15.15%) |
Shootings (21.31%) | Curiosities (13.33%) | International politics (25%) | Ukrainian war (15.15%) | |
Celebrities (14.75%) | Current affairs (13.33%) | Sports (12.5%) | The environment (15.15%) | |
Curiosities (9.84%) | Science and technology (6.67%) | Ukrainian war (9.38%) | International politics (12.12%) | |
Economy (8.20%) | International (6.67%) | The environment (9.38%) | National politics, Health, Current affairs (9.09%) | |
Most Read | National politics (31.82%) | Ukrainian war (27.03%) | Celebrities (23.81%) | Celebrities (22.03%) |
Current affairs (12.5%) | International (18.92%) | Sports (20.63%) | Sports (16.95%) | |
Shootings (12.5%) | Current affairs (18.92%) | Science and technology (11.11%) | Curiosities (8.47%) | |
Curiosities (9.09%) | Curiosities (13.51%) | Current affairs (9.52%) | Economy (8.47%) | |
Celebrities (9.09%) | Celebrities (8.11%) | Crimes (7.94%) | Ukrainian war (8.47%) | |
Most Viral | Current affairs (44%) | Celebrities (26.32%) | Sports (33.33%) | International politics (18.52%) |
Shootings (40%) | Sports (18.42%) | Celebrities (28.57%) | Culture (14.81%) | |
Science and technology (12%) | National politics (15.79%) | Science and technology (16.67%) | Crimes (11.11%) | |
Celebrities (12%) | Curiosities (13.16%) | Inequality and social movements (16.67%) | Sports (7.41%) | |
National politics, international politics (12%) | International politics (13.16%) | Current affairs (16.67%) | Celebrities (7.41%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Diez-Gracia, A.; Sánchez-García, P.; Palau-Sampio, D.; Sánchez-Sobradillo, I. Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media: Tabloidisation and Information Gap to Attract Audiences. Soc. Sci. 2024, 13, 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080430
Diez-Gracia A, Sánchez-García P, Palau-Sampio D, Sánchez-Sobradillo I. Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media: Tabloidisation and Information Gap to Attract Audiences. Social Sciences. 2024; 13(8):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080430
Chicago/Turabian StyleDiez-Gracia, Alba, Pilar Sánchez-García, Dolors Palau-Sampio, and Iris Sánchez-Sobradillo. 2024. "Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media: Tabloidisation and Information Gap to Attract Audiences" Social Sciences 13, no. 8: 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080430
APA StyleDiez-Gracia, A., Sánchez-García, P., Palau-Sampio, D., & Sánchez-Sobradillo, I. (2024). Clickbait Contagion in International Quality Media: Tabloidisation and Information Gap to Attract Audiences. Social Sciences, 13(8), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080430