Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Teaching and Learning with Matter
Previous Article in Journal
The Intertextuality and Translations of Fine Art and Class in Hip-Hop Culture
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Journal Block and Its Art School Context
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Towards a Fair, Rigorous and Transparent Fine Art Curriculum and Assessment Framework

College of Design and Social Context, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 September 2018 / Revised: 6 November 2018 / Accepted: 12 November 2018 / Published: 16 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [254 KB, uploaded 19 November 2018]

Abstract

Assessing creative work is a complex issue in fine art education, particularly with the academy’s push toward the standardisation of assessment practices. This creates particular challenges for art educators such as defining creativity; balancing assessment of the person, the process and the outcome; identifying suitable assessment criteria; moderating subjective responses of assessors; providing feedback that does not inhibit future risk-taking, experimentation and creativity; and considering assessment for, as and of learning. This paper reports on a five-year curriculum and assessment project in the fine art undergraduate degree within an Australian university. The project was designed to provide greater clarity and transparency in the assessment of all aspects of creative and written works within the degree. Using case study and action learning methodologies, we found that assessing in fine art requires artistry and engaged dialogue. This dialogue must allow the language of the discipline to emerge and take into account the pedagogical purpose of assessment. When this process is systemically enacted across the curriculum of a program, assessment can move towards a fairer, more rigorous and transparent approach. We present a fine art curriculum and assessment framework that embeds the values of art educators and simultaneously acts within institutional requirements for assessment. View Full-Text
Keywords: creativity; assessment; fine art; rubrics; levels of achievement; curriculum domain; knowledge framework creativity; assessment; fine art; rubrics; levels of achievement; curriculum domain; knowledge framework
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Clarke, A.; Hulbert, S.; Summers, F. Towards a Fair, Rigorous and Transparent Fine Art Curriculum and Assessment Framework. Arts 2018, 7, 81.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Arts EISSN 2076-0752 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top