Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Teaching and Learning with Matter
Previous Article in Journal
The Intertextuality and Translations of Fine Art and Class in Hip-Hop Culture
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Journal Block and Its Art School Context
Open AccessArticle

Towards a Fair, Rigorous and Transparent Fine Art Curriculum and Assessment Framework

College of Design and Social Context, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 September 2018 / Revised: 6 November 2018 / Accepted: 12 November 2018 / Published: 16 November 2018
Assessing creative work is a complex issue in fine art education, particularly with the academy’s push toward the standardisation of assessment practices. This creates particular challenges for art educators such as defining creativity; balancing assessment of the person, the process and the outcome; identifying suitable assessment criteria; moderating subjective responses of assessors; providing feedback that does not inhibit future risk-taking, experimentation and creativity; and considering assessment for, as and of learning. This paper reports on a five-year curriculum and assessment project in the fine art undergraduate degree within an Australian university. The project was designed to provide greater clarity and transparency in the assessment of all aspects of creative and written works within the degree. Using case study and action learning methodologies, we found that assessing in fine art requires artistry and engaged dialogue. This dialogue must allow the language of the discipline to emerge and take into account the pedagogical purpose of assessment. When this process is systemically enacted across the curriculum of a program, assessment can move towards a fairer, more rigorous and transparent approach. We present a fine art curriculum and assessment framework that embeds the values of art educators and simultaneously acts within institutional requirements for assessment. View Full-Text
Keywords: creativity; assessment; fine art; rubrics; levels of achievement; curriculum domain; knowledge framework creativity; assessment; fine art; rubrics; levels of achievement; curriculum domain; knowledge framework
MDPI and ACS Style

Clarke, A.; Hulbert, S.; Summers, F. Towards a Fair, Rigorous and Transparent Fine Art Curriculum and Assessment Framework. Arts 2018, 7, 81.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop