Next Article in Journal
Rights-Based Approaches to Environmental Protection and Pandemic Prevention
Next Article in Special Issue
Hearing Children’s Objections in Hague Child Abduction Proceedings in England and Wales, Australia, and the USA
Previous Article in Journal
Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: Human Rights Standards and Their Application in Poland and Slovenia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Abducted Child’s Best Interests versus the Theoretical Child’s Best Interests: Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contemporary Nurturing of the 1980 Hague Convention

1
Westminster Law School, University of Westminster, London W1W 7BY, UK
2
Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Laws 2023, 12(4), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040065
Submission received: 16 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 25 July 2023

Abstract

A key impetus for the implementation of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was the protection of children from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention. This article considers how well the Convention is achieving this aim in light of the challenges it faces in a global society that has changed significantly since its introduction. Two key aspects of the Convention’s operation are addressed in this regard: (i) The intersection between domestic violence and the exception to return in Article 13(1)(b); and (ii) the adoption of practices to enable abducted children to receive information about, and be given effective opportunities to express their views and be heard in, Convention cases. The article discusses why, how, and to what extent the Convention needs to be nurtured to best position it to meet current and future challenges and demands, including the current differences in interpretation and implementation globally. Suggestions are made to help future-proof the Convention so that children can be best protected in the way envisioned by the Convention.
Keywords: international child abduction; 1980 Hague Convention; Article 13(1)(b); grave risk; intolerable situation; domestic violence; UNCRC; child participation; children’s views; hearing children in 1980 Hague Convention proceedings; nurturing the 1980 Hague Convention international child abduction; 1980 Hague Convention; Article 13(1)(b); grave risk; intolerable situation; domestic violence; UNCRC; child participation; children’s views; hearing children in 1980 Hague Convention proceedings; nurturing the 1980 Hague Convention

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Freeman, M.; Taylor, N. Contemporary Nurturing of the 1980 Hague Convention. Laws 2023, 12, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040065

AMA Style

Freeman M, Taylor N. Contemporary Nurturing of the 1980 Hague Convention. Laws. 2023; 12(4):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Freeman, Marilyn, and Nicola Taylor. 2023. "Contemporary Nurturing of the 1980 Hague Convention" Laws 12, no. 4: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040065

APA Style

Freeman, M., & Taylor, N. (2023). Contemporary Nurturing of the 1980 Hague Convention. Laws, 12(4), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop