Regulating the Digital Carbon Footprint: Green Information Systems Governance in India’s Copyright Societies
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework and Literature Review
2.1. The Principle of Efficient Management in Indian Copyright Law
2.1.1. Indian Legal and Policy Foundations
2.1.2. International Recognition of Efficiency as a Core Objective
“The most important task for a copyright society is to pay commensurate amounts to the authors and publishers for the use of their works… A copyright society can only claim to have ‘efficient management’ if the costs of that management remain within a reasonable range.”
2.1.3. Implications for Digital Environmental Performance
2.2. Green Information Systems: From Organisational to Societal Governance
2.3. Digital Infrastructure and Environmental Governance
2.4. Regulatory Governance and Information Management
2.5. Copyright Societies as Information Management Organisations
2.6. Synthesis and Research Gap
“How do institutional and governance factors shape the digital environmental performance of statutory information systems and how can sustainability be enhanced in this context?”
2.7. Defining ‘Emerging Environmental Standards’ for Websites
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Sample
3.3. Data Collection
- Grams of CO2 per page view (primary variable to assess efficiency);
- CO2 per year per 10,000 visits (scaled-up version);
- Energy consumed (in kWh);
- Type of energy (Standard or Sustainable/Green);
- Cleanliness rating and Green/No Green classification;
- Offset equivalents (number of trees to sequester).
3.4. Analytical Framework
3.5. Methodological Limitations
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Overview and Compliance Status
4.2. Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions: A Detailed Breakdown
4.3. Aggregate Environmental Impact and Offsetting Burden
4.4. Analysis of Key Determinants: Hosting, Design, and Regulatory Vintage
4.4.1. The Inefficacy of Green Hosting as a Standalone Measure
4.4.2. Statutory Vintage and Traffic Patterns
5. Discussion: Legal and Regulatory Implications
5.1. Extending Green IS Theory to Statutory Digital Infrastructure
5.2. Governance Implications for Public-Sector Information Systems
- Infrastructure level: Mandating efficient hosting arrangements and access to renewable energy.
- Application level: Compliance with sustainable web design principles.
- Governance level: Transparent disclosure of environmental performance.
5.3. The Symbolic Compliance Risk
5.4. Proportionate Governance for High-Impact Portals
6. A Governance Framework for Digital Sustainability
6.1. Framework Components
- Measurement and Reporting: Mandatory reporting of digital carbon metrics (Watson et al. 2010).
- Technical Standards: Prescriptive and performance standards based on the Sustainable Web Design framework (Frick 2016).
- Governance Integration: Embedding sustainability into existing governance frameworks (institutional theory).
6.2. Interventions for the Copyright Office and Central Government
6.2.1. Amend Copyright Rules to Mandate Digital Carbon Reporting
6.2.2. Issue Sustainable Web Design Guidelines for Statutory Portals
6.2.3. Leverage Public Procurement Rules
6.3. Interventions for Copyright Societies
6.3.1. Embed ‘Green by Design’ into Corporate Governance
6.3.2. Utilise CSR Funds for Digital Sustainability
6.3.3. Proactive Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement
6.4. Towards a ‘Green Copyright Portal’ Certification
7. Conclusions
7.1. Contributions to Theory and Practice
- Theoretically, this study expands Green IS research to statutory digital infrastructure, revealing how institutional arrangements shape environmental outcomes in public sector-IS. The observed decoupling of formal governance from actual practice contributes to the institutional theories of Green IS adoption. The discovery of symbolic compliance risks (green hosting alone) broadens our understanding of partial interventions.
- Empirically, this study provides the first comprehensive audit of the digital carbon emissions of Copyright Societies in India. The finding that 66.7% of societies have high-emitting websites, with the worst-performing site emitting 24.53 g CO2 per page view, quantifies the governance gap.
- Practically, this study offers a theoretically informed governance model with targeted interventions for different actor groups, providing a blueprint for integrating digital sustainability into statutory arrangements.
7.2. Limitations and Future Research
7.3. Concluding Remarks
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bélanger, France, and Robert E. Crossler. 2011. Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 35: 1017–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, Tom. 2011. Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of green IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20: 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmas, Magali A., and Vanessa Cuerel Burbano. 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review 54: 64–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliot, Steve. 2011. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-enabled Business Transformation. MIS Quarterly 35: 197–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fountain, Jane E. 2001. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change, 1st ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
- Frick, Tim. 2016. Designing for Sustainability: A Guide to Building Greener Digital Products and Services, 1st ed. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media. [Google Scholar]
- Gervais, Daniel. 2025. Collective Management of Copyright: Theory and Practice in the Digital Age. In Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 4th ed. Edited by Daniel Gervais and João Pedro Quintais. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Gholami, Roya, Ainin Binti Sulaiman, T. Ramayah, and Alemayehu Molla. 2013. Senior Managers’ Perception on Green Information Systems (IS) Adoption and Environmental Performance: Results From a Field Survey. Information & Management 50: 431–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government of India. 2022. India’s Long-Term Low-Carbon Development Strategy; New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
- Hanseth, Ole, and Kalle Lyytinen. 2010. Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The Case of Building Internet. Journal of Information Technology 25: 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Felicia H. M., Karen P. Y. Lai, Bertrand Seah, and Winston T. L. Chow. 2025. Decarbonising Digital Infrastructure and Urban Sustainability in the Case of Data Centres. npj Urban Sustainability 5: 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loeser, Fabian, Jan Recker, Jan Vom Brocke, Alemayehu Molla, and Ruediger Zarnekow. 2017. How IT Executives Create Organizational Benefits by Translating Environmental Strategies into Green IS Initiatives. Information Systems Journal 27: 503–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melville, Nigel P. 2010. Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability. MIS Quarterly 34: 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. 2025. Green Data Centre Guidelines (Draft); New Delhi: MeitY.
- OECD. 2018. Risk Focus and Proportionality. In OECD Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 45–46. [Google Scholar]
- Rothstein, Henry, Phil Irving, Terry Walden, and Roger Yearsley. 2006. The risks of risk-based regulation: Insights from the environmental policy domain. Environment International 32: 1056–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Securities and Exchange Board of India. 2021. Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting by Listed Entities; Circular SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD-2/P/CIR/2021/562; Mumbai: SEBI.
- Sedlmeir, Johannes, Hans Ulrich Buhl, Gilbert Fridgen, and Robert Keller. 2020. The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth. Business & Information Systems Engineering 62: 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seidel, Stefan, Jan Recker, and Jan vom Brocke. 2013. Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations. MIS Quarterly 37: 1275–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, Rajnish Kumar. 2020. Collective Administration of Copyright Through Copyright Societies in India. In Intellectual Property Rights: Contemporary Developments, 1st ed. Edited by Virendra Kumar Ahuja and Archa Vashishtha. Gurgaon: Thomson Reuters, pp. 52–70. [Google Scholar]
- Strubell, Emma, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2019. Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3645–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, S. 2020. Role of Collecting Societies in Ensuring a Balanced Copyright System. In Intellectual Property Rights: Contemporary Developments, 1st ed. Edited by Virendra Kumar Ahuja and Archa Vashishtha. Gurgaon: Thomson Reuters, pp. 40–51. [Google Scholar]
- Tilson, David, Kalle Lyytinen, and Carsten Sørensen. 2010. Research Commentary: Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 21: 748–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchtenhagen, Ulrich. 2005. The Setting-Up of New Copyright Societies: Some Experiences and Reflexions. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Available online: https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=135 (accessed on 7 June 2026).
- United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Document No. A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, Richard T., Marie Claude Boudreau, and Adela J. Chen. 2010. Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community. MIS Quarterly 34: 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Society Name (Abbreviation) | Year of Registration | Carbon Classification | Primary Repertoire Managed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. (IPRS) | 1996 | Green | Musical Works (Composition/Lyrics) |
| Phonographic Performance Ltd. (PPL) | 1996 | No Green | Sound Recordings |
| Indian Reprographic Rights Org. (IRRO) | 2000 | Green | Literary and Artistic Works |
| Indian Singers Rights Association (ISRA) | 2013 | No Green | Performers’ Rights in Sound Recordings |
| Cinefil Producers Performance Ltd. (CPPL) | 2023 | No Green | Cinematograph Films |
| Screenwriters Rights Association of India (SRAI) | 2024 | No Green | Literary Works (Screenplays) |
| Society for Copyright Regulation of Indian Producers (SCRIPT) | 2025 | n/a | Cinematograph and Television Films |
| Society | Carbon Class | Energy Use (kWh) | CO2 per Page View (g) | Cleanliness (%) | Page Weight (MB, est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPRS | Green | 166 | 0.61 | 92% | ~0.4 |
| IRRO | Green | 195 | 0.62 | 91% | ~0.4 |
| PPL | No Green | 2899 | 24.53 | 2% | ~15.0 |
| ISRA | No Green | 396 | 1.26 | 87% | ~0.8 |
| CPPL | No Green | 1040 | 3.80 | 65% | ~2.5 |
| SRAI | No Green | 464 | 1.85 | 80% | ~1.2 |
| Mean (Green) | 180.5 | 0.615 | 91.5% | ~0.4 | |
| Mean (No Green) | 724.75 | 2.49 | 58.5% | ~4.9 | |
| Sector Total/Avg. | ~906.8 | ~3.11 | 69.3% | ~3.5 |
| Carbon Class | No. of Societies | ∑ Organic Traffic (Visits/Month) | ∑ CO2 per 10k Visits/Month (kg) | Annual CO2 (kg) | Trees to Compensate (Annual) | Electric Car km Equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | 2 | ~3000 | 147.96 | 1775.5 | 8 | 2309 |
| No Green | 4 | ~16,030 | 1197.16 | 14,365.9 | 56 | 18,556 |
| Total | 7 | ~19,030 | 1345.12 | 16,141.4 | 64 | 20,865 |
| Hosting Energy Type | A+ to C Rating | D to F Rating | ‘Green’ Class | ‘No Green’ Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Energy | 1 (IRRO) | 2 (PPL, ISRA) | 1 | 2 |
| Standard (Grid) Energy | 0 | 3 (IPRS, CPPL, SRAI) | 1 | 2 |
| Total | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 1 | Government of India. 1957. The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957). New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice. |
| 2 | Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion. 2016. National Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy. Available online: https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/world/asia/in/ip/pdf/national_ip_20160512en.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2026). |
| 3 | see Footnote 2 above. |
| 4 | see Footnote 1 above. |
| 5 | Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern Indian Motion Pictures Association. AIR 1977 SC 1443; (1977) 2 SCC 820. |
| 6 | Phonographic Performance Ltd. v. Union of India. 2022:DHC:874. |
| 7 | see Footnote 1 above. |
| 8 | see Footnote 1 above. |
| 9 | Government of India. 2017. General Financial Rules, 2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance. |
| 10 | Government of India. 2013. The Companies Act, 2013 (No. 18 of 2013). New Delhi: Ministry of Corporate Affairs. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Devarhubli, G. Regulating the Digital Carbon Footprint: Green Information Systems Governance in India’s Copyright Societies. Laws 2026, 15, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040061
Devarhubli G. Regulating the Digital Carbon Footprint: Green Information Systems Governance in India’s Copyright Societies. Laws. 2026; 15(4):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040061
Chicago/Turabian StyleDevarhubli, Gururaj. 2026. "Regulating the Digital Carbon Footprint: Green Information Systems Governance in India’s Copyright Societies" Laws 15, no. 4: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040061
APA StyleDevarhubli, G. (2026). Regulating the Digital Carbon Footprint: Green Information Systems Governance in India’s Copyright Societies. Laws, 15(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040061

