Next Article in Journal
Innovative Methods for Intensifying the Processing of Zinc Clinker: Synergy of Microwave Treatment and Ultrasonic Leaching
Previous Article in Journal
Hot-Deformed Microstructure and Texture of Ti-62222 Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modification of Desulfurization Slag for Hot Metal Bearing V-Ti and Industry Application

1
Collaborative Innovation Center of Steel Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Pangang Group Research Institute Co., Ltd., Panzhihua 617000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2025, 15(3), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030245
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 22 February 2025 / Accepted: 22 February 2025 / Published: 25 February 2025

Abstract

In view of the high loss of iron during hot metal desulfurization treatment at Pangang Steel, the factors influencing slag skimming iron loss were analyzed thoroughly by thermodynamic calculation with the aid of FactSage. A desulfurization modifier containing Na2O and Al2O3 was designed. An industrial verification test was conducted for the newly designed calcium-based agent. The test results indicate that adding 8% of the modifier to the passivating lime achieves the optimal modification effect on the desulfurization slag. After modifying the desulfurization slag, the consumption of magnesium powder for every 0.001% sulfur removed decreased from 0.0149 kg to 0.0136 kg, the iron loss during slag skimming reduced from 3.52% to 2.28%, and the average slag skimming time shortened by 1.5 min. These improvements significantly lowered production costs, enhanced desulfurization efficiency, and laid the foundation for the widespread application of the semi-steel silicon addition process.

1. Introduction

Pangang Steel utilizes the unique vanadium–titanium magnetite resources of the Panxi region for smelting, resulting in molten iron that contains vanadium and titanium, while having low levels of heat-generating elements such as silicon and manganese. This leads to lower molten iron temperatures and higher sulfur content. The carbon content of the semi-steel produced from vanadium-rich molten iron through converter refining fluctuates between 2.5% and 4.0%, with trace amounts of heat-generating slag-forming elements like silicon and manganese. Consequently, the steelmaking converter faces a severe shortage of thermal energy when refining the semi-steel, leading to slow slag formation. This situation compels Pangang Steel to adopt a carbon-increasing end-point control method during the production of medium and high-carbon steels [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. This control method results in excessive deep blowing at the converter’s end, high oxidizing properties of the slag, and increases the refining costs while reducing the quality of the molten steel. To address the issue of insufficient thermal energy, Pangang Steel has previously attempted thermal compensation by adding temperature-raising agents such as coke powder, anthracite, ferrosilicon, and silicon carbide into the converter. Additionally, the exploration of dual-channel oxygen lancing to improve thermal efficiency and preheating scrap steel has not yielded satisfactory results [13,14,15].
Through years of dedicated investigations, Pangang Steel has developed a unique production process for the unique vanadium–titanium magnetite resources of the Panxi region to produce vanadium–titanium molten iron [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Recently, in order to solve the problem of insufficient heat sources for semi-steel smelting, a new process was developed wherein ferrosilicon is added to the semi-steel during the steelmaking process. This increases the silicon content in the semi-steel, thereby enhancing its chemical heat and promoting slag formation during the converter steelmaking process. The flow chart for vanadium–titanium ironmaking is illustrated in Figure 1. After the silicon addition of semi-steel, some silicon oxidation enters into the pretreatment desulphurization slag, the state of the desulphurization slag changes significantly, and the slag iron is not distinguished, which leads to the extension of slagging time and the increase in iron loss after the pretreatment desulphurization, which seriously restricts the popularization and application of the new process. To solve this problem, dilute slag agents such as ice crystal, broken glass, and fluorite are usually added to change the viscosity of the desulfurized slag to reduce the amount of iron in the slag [22,23,24,25,26,27]. There are few reports on metal iron and total iron in desulfurization slag at home and abroad. A foreign company added a 4% modifier to the desulfurization agent, reducing the metal iron in the desulfurization slag by 10 percentage points, but the modifier is costly [28]. Many domestic steel mills have added modified agents to the desulfurization process of molten iron, which has a certain iron reduction effect, but it is not significant. Most steel enterprises still have more than 30% of metal iron in sulfur slag [29,30,31,32,33].
In view of the particularity of Pangang semi-steel desulfurization, this paper designed the optimal modification agent with the help of FactSage 8.2 thermodynamic calculation software and modified the desulfurization slag through industrial experiments. The desulfurization slag state was further improved, effectively reducing the desulfurization slag content. The iron quantity and slag removal iron loss have laid the foundation for the comprehensive promotion and application of the new silicon-enhancing process.

2. Experimental

In order to ensure the heat source for subsequent steelmaking, the silicon-increasing heat compensation process was adopted in the steel-making process of the vanadium-extracting converter, namely: ① The temperature of the semi-steel was 1360–1400 °C, the carbon content of the semi-steel was 3.40–3.60%, and the residual vanadium of the semi-steel is ≤0.035%. ② When tapping the steel, ferrosilicon (Chengdu Jiwei Internet of Things E-commerce Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China) was added to deoxidize and increase silicon when the steel was 1/3 tapped. The actual amount of ferrosilicon used when tapping the semi-steel was determined according to the carbon content of the semi-steel. The corresponding relationship between the carbon content of the semi-steel and the amount of ferrosilicon added when tapping the semi-steel is shown in Table 1.
Because of the addition of ferrosilicon, the silicon content of semi-steel was increased to 0.10–0.15%. In the desulfurization process, some of the silicon oxidizes, leading to the SiO2 content of the desulfurization slag increased by 4.59% during the subsequent desulfurization pretreatment (as shown in Table 2). Although this does not significantly impact the desulfurization rate, the state of the desulfurization slag is changed and severely affects the slag removal operation. As shown in Figure 2, it can be observed that the top of the desulfurization slag was severely powdered, and the interface of slag–metal was sticky and soft. Meanwhile, black solidified desulfurization slag continuously precipitated, resulting in the slag removal becoming more difficult, with the average sulfur recovery during BOF blowing increasing by 0.002–0.004% compared to the original process, along with an increase in iron loss during slag removal of 0.54 kg/t Fe. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to adjust the desulphurization slag, ensure the desulphurization rate, and improve the separation effect of slag and iron.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Original Desulphurization Slag

From Figure 3, we can see that the morphology of the original desulfurization slag is mainly composed of fine particles and dust. After adding silicon, the agglomeration of desulfurization slag increased, indicating that changes in the silicon content in the desulfurization slag increase the viscosity of the desulfurization slag, and changes in the interface tension make the slag and iron aggregate into blocks, making it more difficult to separate slag–iron.
Compared with the desulfurization of molten iron, the temperature of semi-steel is relatively low. In addition, the semi-steel magnesium composite desulfurization agent is only lime and magnesium powder. The MLA measurement results (as shown in Figure 4 and Table 3) show that desulphurization slag is mainly high-melting point oxides such as CaO, MgO, and Cao-Mgo solid solution. A large amount of iron is wrapped in the high-melting-point phase (as shown in Figure 5). So, the high melting point and low overheating degree of semi-steel contribute to this issue. Lime and magnesium oxide absorb heat within the ladle, which can locally cause the semi-steel to solidify and form a co-solidified shell with desulfurization slag. Lime can also co-solidify with the semi-steel; when the coalesced slag–iron rises to the surface of the ladle due to the rapid temperature drop, the semi-steel solidifies quickly and cannot return to the molten state. This portion of the semi-steel will be lost during the slag removal process.
Thus, it is evident that whether molten iron or semi-steel, it is essential to reduce the alkalinity of desulfurization slag and lower its melting temperature to improve the flow characteristics and rheological properties of the slag, thereby facilitating slag removal. Furthermore, only by decreasing the surface tension of the slag can we fundamentally reduce the viscosity of the desulfurization slag and minimize iron losses within the slag.

3.2. Suitable Silicon Content in Semi-Steel

As shown in Figure 6, the higher the silicon content in the semi-steel, the greater the viscosity of the semi-steel. Additionally, a lower molten iron temperature reduces the energy of atomic thermal motion, which decreases the activation energy required for particle movement. This may also increase the size of the viscous flow units that form clusters, thereby increasing viscosity. After the silicon content is increased in the semi-steel, the rise in viscosity affects the diffusion rate of sulfur within the semi-steel, leading to a reduction in desulfurization efficiency. Furthermore, it prolongs the time required for desulfurization slag, particularly fine powdery slag, to float to the liquid surface, resulting in the continuous appearance of fine slag after the desulfurization and slag removal processes in silicon-increased semi-steel. This leads to longer slag removal times and greater iron loss.
Considering the later heat supplement and slag-making requirements, the Si content level of 0.1% was determined for subsequent experiments.

3.3. Liquid-Phase Region Analysis of Slag System

Based on the characteristics of the desulfurization production process, the main components of desulfurization slag include CaO (primarily from passive lime), MgO (mainly from the oxidation of magnesium powder), FeO, Al2O3, and SiO2 (mainly from the slag of previous processes). This composition results in a high melting point and a low number of low-melting-point substances in the desulfurization slag. During the desulfurization process, a portion of the molten iron mixes with the high-melting-point slag, leading to heat exchange. When the temperature of the molten iron drops below the melting point, it adheres to the slag, making it impossible to separate the slag from the iron and causing high iron losses. Therefore, three kinds of desulphurization slag with Al2O3 content of 0.08%, 2%, and 6.3% were designed according to the field application results, and 1.5%Na2O was added to the base to calculate the change in the liquid phase of each desulphurization slag system. The main components of each slag system are shown in Table 4.
As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, when the slag contains only CaO, SiO2, and FeO, the liquid-phase region at 1350 °C is relatively large. However, when MgO is present, the liquid-phase region decreases sharply. In the desulfurization process using magnesium as the primary desulfurizing agent, a large amount of MgO enters the slag, resulting in a minimal liquid-phase region in the desulfurization slag (see Figure 9), which leads to a higher iron content in the desulfurization slag.
To lower the melting point of desulfurization slag and improve the overall separation efficiency of slag and iron, it is essential to increase the liquid-phase region of the slag. From long-term practical experience, it is known that alkali metal oxides and chlorides can lower the melting point of the slag; however, they pose significant hazards to equipment and the environment. Given the high CaO content in desulfurization slag, one can consider adding Al2O3 to form low-melting-point compounds such as 12CaO·7Al2O3, thereby reducing the overall melting point of the slag. As illustrated in the melting point diagrams of slag systems with varying Al2O3 contents (Figure 10), it can be observed that as the Al2O3 content in the slag increases, the liquid-phase region tends to enlarge. Therefore, after adding Al2O3, introducing alkali metal oxides can further promote the expansion of the low-melting-point region.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 indicate that the liquidus region of the basic slag system CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 is expanded with the increasing content of Na2O from 1.5% at 1350 °C. Adding the 1.5% Na2O to multiple systems, the melting point of the slag system decreased significantly.
Therefore, the formulation of the modifier can consider adding Al2O3 and Na2O to adjust the state of the desulfurization slag. The amount of Na2O should be kept below 2% to minimize its impact on equipment and the environment, while the content of Al2O3 can be optimized by adjusting the dosage of the modifier. For example, with the addition of 6.3% Al2O3 and 1.5% Na2O (Figure 13), a noticeable expansion of the liquid-phase region is evident.

3.4. Analysis of Desulfurization Effect After Slag System Optimization

Thus, the main components of the desulfurization modifier specifically designed for the desulfurization station of Pangang Steel’s semi-steel magnesium desulfurization process should include CaO, Na2O, and Al2O3. The desulfurizing modifier uses soda ash and dust from the electrolytic aluminum plant (as shown in Table 5) as raw materials and is added to the production process of passivated lime to ensure that the composition of passivated lime meets the requirements of Table 6.
According to the theoretical calculation results, industrial validation tests with additive amounts of 6%, 8%, and 10% were designed to explore the optimal dosage of modifier. The desulfurization modifier was uniformly mixed with lime and then introduced into the mixing system for blending, grinding, and passivation, resulting in the improved passivated lime required for the experiments. The improved passivated lime was then injected for desulfurization using magnesium powder following the original injection process.
Among the commonly used indicators for evaluating desulfurization effectiveness, magnesium consumption per unit and iron loss are the most important, as they both represent the desulfurization capacity of the agent and reflect the desulfurization cost. Based on the results of the industrial verification (Figure 14), compared with the amount of other modified agents added, the desulfurization rate of 8% of the modified agent reached 88.01%, which was the highest, while the magnesium unit consumption was 0.0137 kg/tFe and the slag-stripping iron loss was 2.3%, which was the lowest. Therefore, adding an 8% modifier has a better comprehensive desulfurization effect. Therefore, the final component requirements for the passivated lime with an 8% modifier are listed in Table 7, and the requirements for the modifier composition are detailed in Table 8.
Under the optimal modifier-adding conditions, the change in desulfurization slag composition is shown in Table 9, and the desulfurization effect verified by industry is shown in Table 10. It can be seen from the table that the desulfurization rate of the test furnace is basically the same when the sulfur content is increased, but the MFe and TFe in the desulfurization slag are 23.02% and 27.62%, which are reduced by 1.77% and 6.01%, respectively. The skimming time is reduced by 1.5 min, compared with the comparison, indicating that the separation effect of slag and iron has been significantly improved after slag adjustment.
Figure 15 and Figure 16 show the phase diagrams for quaternary and multi-component slag systems, representing the desulfurization slag before and after modification, respectively. After the addition of substances such as Al2O3 and Na2O, the modified desulfurization slag exhibits a larger liquid-phase region compared to the original desulfurization slag, indicating a significant improvement in the melting characteristics of the slag. Additionally, there are substantial changes in the resulting materials. Under desulfurization temperature conditions, the original desulfurization slag primarily contains MgO, CaO, 3CaO·SiO2, and 3CaO·MgO·2SiO2 in the liquid phase. In contrast, the modified slag features more MgO and CaO participating in the formation of liquid-phase materials, while the solid phase contains not only MgO and CaO but also 3CaO·MgO·2Al2O3(s), 3CaO·MgO·2SiO2, and 2CaO·SiO2. The increase in the variety and composition of solid-phase materials, along with the addition of more types of liquid-phase substances (as shown in Table 11), facilitates the separation between slag and iron and promotes the rapid rise of solid-phase materials.
The interaction between desulfurization slag and semi-steel is illustrated in Figure 17. Without modification, the desulfurization agent is injected into the liquid semi-steel through nitrogen gas, coating the semi-steel and undergoing a desulfurization reaction. The desulfurization products primarily consist of calcium-magnesium oxides, with very little liquid slag present. The desulfurization slag absorbs heat from the semi-steel liquid, forming a solid shell that cools down further, resulting in slag-covered iron. In contrast, with the modified desulfurization agent, the coating and desulfurization reaction still occur on the surface of the semi-steel droplets, but the desulfurization products now include low-melting-point materials containing aluminum and sodium. When these low-melting-point materials are in sufficient quantity, they can effectively isolate the high-melting-point materials, preventing complete coverage of the semi-steel droplets and thus avoiding the formation of slag-covered iron. Therefore, the slag iron separation effect will be better.
The melting point of the desulfurization slag was measured by the HB-6 hemispherical point method melting point meter, and the imaging system obtained the melting of the slag. The melting states of desulfurization slags before and after modification at 1350 °C are shown in Figure 18, which shows that the melting point of the modified desulfurization slag is relatively lower, and its softening effect is superior to that of the unmodified desulfurization slag.
Figure 19 shows the XRD comparison of desulfurization slag before and after modification. It can be seen from the figure that the desulfurization slag mainly contains Fe, CaS, CaO, and MgO phases, and no calcium aluminate phase is found, which may be because the amount of aluminum ash added is too low. The formation of the CaS phase indicates that FeS in semi-steel reacts with CaO in desulfurization slag. The diffraction peak strength of Fe decreases with the addition of aluminum ash, and the addition of aluminum ash is beneficial to the reduction in Fe content in the slag. The diffraction peak intensity of CaS in sample 20805759 and sample 20805757 is higher than that in the desulphurization slag, which indicates that the addition of aluminum ash can improve the desulphurization rate of desulphurization slag. The reasons for the improvement of the desulfurization effect are as follows: in the process of desulfurization, after the formation of the outer CaS, its diffusion in the lime particles is very slow, resulting in a sharp decline in the reaction rate, coupled with the short residence time of the desulfurizer in the hot metal during the test, once the CaS reaction layer is formed, it is difficult for the internal CaO to continue to participate in the reaction. After adding aluminum ash, Al2O3 in aluminum ash reacts with CaO to form calcium aluminate with a low melting point, forming a liquid reaction layer, so that sulfur diffuses easily into the interior of the CaO particles. Therefore, adding a certain amount of Al2O3 to the desulfurizer is conducive to speeding up the speed of the desulfurization reaction, increasing the desulfurization amount and desulfurization rate of the desulfurizer, and improving the utilization rate of the lime particles. At the same time, the low-melting-point slag has better fluidity and lower viscosity, which can inhibit the inclusion of metal Fe in the desulphurization slag, and then reduce the content of TFe in the slag.
According to the analysis results of the modified desulphurization slag phase (as shown in Figure 20 and Table 12), in addition to the phase formed by CaO and MgO, there are also phases containing Na and Al in the desulphurization slag, which further proves that the modifier plays a regulating role in the desulphurization slag phase and supports the realization of the desulphurization efficiency and the iron reduction effect of the desulphurization slag.

4. Conclusions

  • In response to the issue of high iron loss during the pretreatment desulfurization slagging process in the semi-steel silicon enhancement new technology, a desulfurization modifier containing Na2O and Al2O3 was designed using FactSage thermodynamic calculation software. Industrial tests have verified that adding an 8% modifier to passivated lime can achieve optimal magnesium desulfurization agent consumption and iron loss indicators.
  • After modifying the desulfurization slag, the magnesium powder consumption per 0.001% sulfur removal decreased from 0.0149 kg to 0.0136 kg, while the iron loss during slagging reduced from 3.52% to 2.28%. The average slagging time was shortened by 1.5 min, significantly lowering production costs and improving the efficiency of pretreatment desulfurization.
  • By modifying desulphurization slag, good industrial verification results were obtained, and the research results have been widely applied in the Pangang production site. However, further improving the reaction efficiency of slag–metal and improving the separation effect of slag and metal will be an important research direction in the future desulfurization process of vanadium and titanium hot metal pretreatment.
  • The successful application of desulfurization slag modification technology has laid the foundation for the comprehensive promotion and application of the semi-steel silicon enhancement process, effectively alleviating the long-time historical problem of an insufficient heat sources for semi-steel smelting, and effectively supporting the efficient utilization of vanadium–titanium magnetite in the Panxi area of China.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W.; methodology, L.W.; validation, L.W.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, J.C.; resources, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; visualization, L.C.; supervision, L.C.; funding acquisition, L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number 52274406.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Jun Chen and Lian Chen were employed by the company Pangang Group Research Institute Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qing, J.S.; Li, S.; Xiao, M.F.; Yang, S.X.; Li, J.Q.; Huang, D.H. Research and practice of increase in heavy rail steel endpoint carbon content. Steelmaking 2011, 27, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, J.; Lin, D. Effect of converter final controlling on inclusions in the steel. Met. Mater. Metall. Eng. 2012, 40, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu, G.Q. Study and practice of dephosphorization and carbon conservation technology for high carbon steel. Metall. Collect. 2015, 4, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ji, R.D. Technology of catch carbon to produce medium-high carbon steel in converter. World Iron Steel 2013, 13, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. He, S.M.; Li, Z.G. Dephosphorization of medium and high carbon steel in reblowing converter. Res. Eng. Technol. 2013, 3, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, J.X.; Hao, X.D.; Han, X.L.; Liu, L.N.; Qiu, S.T.; Zhao, P. Study of mineralogical morphology on slag in the process of converter. Iron Steel 2009, 44, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, Y.P.; Cheng, G.J.; Wang, S.Z.; Liu, H.Q. Control of medium and high carbon steel phosphorus in converter smelting. Res. Iron Steel 2005, 33, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, S.M.; He, D.Y. Control of phosphorus in high carbon steel smelting process. J. North China Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 1995, 17, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, H.; Chen, F.Y.; Wang, Y.H. End Point Optimized Control for BOF Steel-Making Process Based on the Characteristic of Subsidiary Material′s Movement. J. Iron Steel Res. 2013, 1, 9–12+46. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, D.W.; Li, H.B.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, X.B. Deep dephosphorization of IF steel in converter. J. Iron Steel Res. 2017, 29, 997–1005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dai, Y.G.; Wang, L.X.; Song, Y.X.; Lu, L.X.; Li, Y.F. Control of C and Mn elements for conductive pure iron smelting by converter. J. Iron Steel Res. 2016, 28, 6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng, X.Y.; Ma, J.C.; Zhao, W.J.; Cao, B.; Jin, H.J.; Li, S. Process Optimization of High Hot Metal Charging Ratio for EAF Steelmaking. J. Iron Steel Res. 2013, 25, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gu, L.J.; Xu, L.Z.; Liu, N.P. Experimental study on converter blowing semi-steel with coal instead of coke. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 1990, 11, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuan, Z.F.; Wan, T.J.; Li, H. Heat compensation technology for converter steelmaking. Steelmaking 1991, 7, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ke, L.; Wang, S.T. Heat compensation technology for converter with coal. Iron Steel 1995, 30, 4. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liang, X.L.; Wang, X.H.; He, X.F.; Wang, W.J. Mineral Phase and Utilization of Semisteel Slag Produced During BOF Double Slag Process. J. Iron Steel Res. 2014, 26, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, T. Applied Fundamental Research on Dephosphorization And Vanadium Extraction during Vanadium Extraction by Converter. Ph.D Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding, M.T. Technological progress of vanadium extraction from vanadium-titanium magnetite. China Nonferrous Metall. 2016, 45, 4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Meng, L.P.; Zhao, C.; Wang, S.N.; Du, H.; Zheng, S.L.; Zou, X. Improvement of Vanadium Extraction from Extracted Vanadium Residue in China. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 2015, 36, 8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, D. Study on Basic Theory and Process of Vanadium Extraction from Hot Metal with Low Carbon and High Vanadium. Ph.D Thesis, China Iron&Steel Research Institute Group, Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, X.M. The Research on Secondary Vanadium Extraction from Vanadium Residue from PanGang Group Company. Ph.D. Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, P. Practice of KR desulfurization process of iron pretreatment in Xiangsteel Steel Plant. Metall. Mater. 2024, 44, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, W.F.; Tian, L.; Hao, S.; Bo, H.; Ma, T.F.; Zhang, Y. Research on the flow performance regulation of magnesium-based desulfurization slag pretreated molten iron. Steelmaking 2023, 39, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, B.; Song, B.; Chen, L.; Sun, H.; Northwood, D.O.; Waters, K.E.; Ma, H. Influence of Top Slag Containing TiO2 and VOx on Hot Metal Pre-Desulfurization. Metals 2024, 14, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, L.; Qing, G.; Cheng, X.; Xu, M.; Zhao, B.; Liao, J. Experimental Study on Desulfurization and Removal of Alkali Behavior of BF Slag System in Low-Slag Ironmaking. Metals 2023, 13, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shen, J.-M.; Lin, C.-M.; Chang, Y.-E.; Lin, H.-J.; Wu, W. Effects of Different CaO/Al2O3 Ratios on the Phase Composition and Desulfurization Ability of CaO-Based Desulfurizers in Hot Metal. Metals 2024, 14, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zang, X.; Ren, J.; Zhao, H. Performance Characterization and Composition Design Using Machine Learning and Optimal Technology for Slag–Desulfurization Gypsum-Based Alkali-Activated Materials. Materials 2024, 17, 3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Echelmeyer, A. Desulfurization agent and powder spraying system of molten iron. In Proceedings of the 7th International Proceedings of Desulphurization Conference, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 5–8 May 2002; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, X.; Wang, H. Research on the desulfurization pretreatment process of pure mafrost water. Nangang Technol. 2003, 4, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, C.; Song, M. Research on the pretreatment process of this steel iron and steel. Bensteel Technol. 2001, 7, 2–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shevchenko, A.F. The process of using magnesium particles to replace magnesium-lime for desulfurization of molten iron and equipment improvement. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Desulfurization, New Orleans, LA, USA, 13–17 May 2002; pp. 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pan, K.; Guo, L. Development and application of Baosteel iron and iron deep desulfurization technology. Shanghai Met. 2000, 22, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, B. Application effects of different molten iron desulfurization processes. Natl. Molten Iron Pretreat. Proc. Tech. Semin. 2003, 11, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Steelmaking Process Flow for Vanadium–Titanium Molten Iron.
Figure 1. Steelmaking Process Flow for Vanadium–Titanium Molten Iron.
Metals 15 00245 g001
Figure 2. End of desulfurization grilled slag.
Figure 2. End of desulfurization grilled slag.
Metals 15 00245 g002
Figure 3. Desulfurization slag before and after adding silicon.
Figure 3. Desulfurization slag before and after adding silicon.
Metals 15 00245 g003
Figure 4. MLA measurement of desulphurization slag. The red box indicates that the image within this box is captured and enlarged, and the resulting enlarged image is as follows.
Figure 4. MLA measurement of desulphurization slag. The red box indicates that the image within this box is captured and enlarged, and the resulting enlarged image is as follows.
Metals 15 00245 g004
Figure 5. Lithofacies of original desulphurization slag.
Figure 5. Lithofacies of original desulphurization slag.
Metals 15 00245 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between silicon content and viscosity of semi-steel.
Figure 6. Relationship between silicon content and viscosity of semi-steel.
Metals 15 00245 g006
Figure 7. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CFS Ternary Slag system.
Figure 7. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CFS Ternary Slag system.
Metals 15 00245 g007
Figure 8. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CMFS Slag system.
Figure 8. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CMFS Slag system.
Metals 15 00245 g008
Figure 9. Isothermal curve area of CMFS pseudo-ternary slag.
Figure 9. Isothermal curve area of CMFS pseudo-ternary slag.
Metals 15 00245 g009
Figure 10. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CMFSA system under different Al2O3.
Figure 10. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CMFSA system under different Al2O3.
Metals 15 00245 g010
Figure 11. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CSA system.
Figure 11. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CSA system.
Metals 15 00245 g011
Figure 12. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CANS system.
Figure 12. The 1350 °C liquid-phase region of the CANS system.
Metals 15 00245 g012
Figure 13. Isothermal curve area of CMFSA0.06N0.015 pseudo-ternary slag.
Figure 13. Isothermal curve area of CMFSA0.06N0.015 pseudo-ternary slag.
Metals 15 00245 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of desulfurization indexes under different amounts of modified agents: (a) Desulfurization Efficiency. (b) Magnesium Consumption Per Unit. (c) Lime Consumption Per Unit. (d) Iron Loss.
Figure 14. Comparison of desulfurization indexes under different amounts of modified agents: (a) Desulfurization Efficiency. (b) Magnesium Consumption Per Unit. (c) Lime Consumption Per Unit. (d) Iron Loss.
Metals 15 00245 g014
Figure 15. Phase diagram of the quaternary slag system.
Figure 15. Phase diagram of the quaternary slag system.
Metals 15 00245 g015
Figure 16. Phase diagram of the multicomponent slag system.
Figure 16. Phase diagram of the multicomponent slag system.
Metals 15 00245 g016
Figure 17. Action diagram of desulfurization slag and semi-steel. (Note: In the figure, black dots represent CaO, blue dots represent magnesium powder, yellow dots represent Al2O3, and green dots represent Na2O. Red dots represent liquid semi-steel, and brown dots represent solid semi-steel).
Figure 17. Action diagram of desulfurization slag and semi-steel. (Note: In the figure, black dots represent CaO, blue dots represent magnesium powder, yellow dots represent Al2O3, and green dots represent Na2O. Red dots represent liquid semi-steel, and brown dots represent solid semi-steel).
Metals 15 00245 g017
Figure 18. Soft melting of desulfurization slag at 1350 °C.
Figure 18. Soft melting of desulfurization slag at 1350 °C.
Metals 15 00245 g018
Figure 19. XRD of desulphurization slag.
Figure 19. XRD of desulphurization slag.
Metals 15 00245 g019
Figure 20. Phase composition of desulphurization slag after modification.
Figure 20. Phase composition of desulphurization slag after modification.
Metals 15 00245 g020
Table 1. Relationship between carbon content and added amount of ferrosilicon in semi-steel.
Table 1. Relationship between carbon content and added amount of ferrosilicon in semi-steel.
Carbon Content of Semi-Steel/%<3.03.0–3.23.2–3.43.4–3.6>3.6
Ferrosilicon dosage/kg·heat−1300200–300100–2001000
Convert it to an increase in carbon/%0.310.21–0.310.10–0.210.100
Table 2. Composition of desulfurization slag/%.
Table 2. Composition of desulfurization slag/%.
ProjectSCaOFeOMgOTotalFeSiO2Desulfurization Rate
Silicon-Increasing Process4.8332.5412.589.7941.755.7996.36
Original Process4.4633.6711.719.1642.601.2096.52
Table 3. Phase composition of desulfurization slag/%.
Table 3. Phase composition of desulfurization slag/%.
Mineral NameMetal IronCao Solid SolutionCao-Mgo Solid SolutionCaMg(SO4)2 Solid SolutionIron OxideFerritePlasterSquare Magnesium StoneCalcium Manganese OlivineCaSO4 Solid SolutionOther
Wt%27.4533.7310.2915.211.872.562.532.391.651.630.068
Table 4. Main components of each slag system/%.
Table 4. Main components of each slag system/%.
ItemsCaOMgOAl2O3FeONa2OSiO2
Original slag39.3611.12-10.06-3.06
Original slag + Al2O336.6610.344.029.40-2.96
Original slag + Na2O38.4210.84-9.850.962.96
Original slag + Al2O3 + Na2O36.0810.184.099.251.022.78
Table 5. Composition of dust removal ash in electrolytic aluminum plant/%.
Table 5. Composition of dust removal ash in electrolytic aluminum plant/%.
FNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2K2OCaOTiO2Fe2O3P2O5
2.01.62.1796.92.00.80.30.60.1
Table 6. Component requirements and actual components of modified passivation lime/%.
Table 6. Component requirements and actual components of modified passivation lime/%.
ItemsCaOAl2O3Na2OF
Requirement≥80≥3≥1.0≥0.5
Real control80.233.451.280.61
Table 7. Composition of Modified passivated lime/%.
Table 7. Composition of Modified passivated lime/%.
ComponentCaO/%Na2OSCalcination<1 mm Particle Size/%<0.075 mm Particle Size/%<0.25 mm Particle Size/%
Requirement≥85≥1.0≤0.10≤5.0100≥80≥98
Table 8. Composition of modifying agent/%.
Table 8. Composition of modifying agent/%.
ComponentCaO/%Na2OAl2O3Calcination<1 mm Particle Size/%<0.075 mm Particle Size/%<0.25 mm Particle Size/%
Requirement≥40≥15.0≥40.0≤5.0100≥80≥98
Table 9. Composition of desulfurization slag before and after optimization/wt%.
Table 9. Composition of desulfurization slag before and after optimization/wt%.
ItemsSCaOSiO2Fe2O3FeOMgOTotalFeMetalFeAl2O3Na2OSample Size
Original4.7735.072.070.759.6411.3733.6324.790.60-20
After optimization5.6546.231.891.514.8412.6827.6223.021.000.19614
Table 10. Comparison of desulfurization rate and slag removal time.
Table 10. Comparison of desulfurization rate and slag removal time.
ItemsSulfur Content Before Desulfurizationt/%Sulfur Content After Desulfurizationt/%Desulfurization Ratet/%Slag Removal Time/
min
Original0.07020.00691.968.7
After optimization0.07820.00792.207.2
Table 11. Type of substance in the multicomponent slag system.
Table 11. Type of substance in the multicomponent slag system.
AreaSubstance Type
1L, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s)
2L, MgO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s)
3L, MgO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s), 3CaO.MgO.2SiO2(s)
4L, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s), 2CaO.SiO2(s)
5L, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s), 2CaO.SiO2(s)
6L, MgO(s), CaO(s), 2CaO.SiO2(s)
7L1, L2, MgO(s), CaO(s), 2CaO.SiO2(s)
8L1, L2, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s)
9L1, L2, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s), 3CaO.MgO.2SiO2(s)
10L, MgO(s), CaO(s), 3CaO.MgO.2Al2O3(s), 3CaO.MgO.2SiO2(s)
Table 12. Mass percentage of each phase.
Table 12. Mass percentage of each phase.
Spectrum NumberONaMgAlSiCaTiMnFe
Mangan-magnesio olivine131.1537.1223.47 7.56
Calcium manganese pyroxene231.170.812.8912.5718.6618.593.5110.890.91
Manganmagnesio olivine321.5638.0223.67 0.69 6.06
Calcium magnesium pyroxene431.595.6411.1717.1922.815.9 5.7
Calcium magnesium pyroxene531.155.711.5817.2322.834.82 6.75
Manganmagnesio olivine631.0637.6823.58 0.77 6.91
Manganmagnesio olivine731.3238.0123.5211.7721.11
Mean 31.280.8121.5311.7723.499.524.757.240.91
Sigma 0.21017.590.723.0711.031.21.72
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, L. Modification of Desulfurization Slag for Hot Metal Bearing V-Ti and Industry Application. Metals 2025, 15, 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030245

AMA Style

Chen J, Chen L, Wang L. Modification of Desulfurization Slag for Hot Metal Bearing V-Ti and Industry Application. Metals. 2025; 15(3):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jun, Lian Chen, and Lijun Wang. 2025. "Modification of Desulfurization Slag for Hot Metal Bearing V-Ti and Industry Application" Metals 15, no. 3: 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030245

APA Style

Chen, J., Chen, L., & Wang, L. (2025). Modification of Desulfurization Slag for Hot Metal Bearing V-Ti and Industry Application. Metals, 15(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop