Next Article in Journal
Performance and Mechanism of Nanoporous Ni@NiO Composites for RhB Ultrahigh Electro-Catalytic Degradation
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in the Utilization of Tungsten Residue: A Mini Review of China
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Optimization Model to Predict the Deposition Rate and Smoothness of Ni Pulse-Reverse Electroplating Based on ANN and Experimental Results
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Performance and Conductivity of N-Doped Carbon Nanotubes Annealed under Various Temperatures as Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High-Temperature-Annealed Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as High-Performance Conductive Agents for LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Lithium-Ion Batteries

Metals 2023, 13(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010036
by Ziting Guo, Shengwen Zhong *, Mihong Cao, Zhengjun Zhong, Qingmei Xiao, Jinchao Huang and Jun Chen *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Metals 2023, 13(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010036
Submission received: 19 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 In the manuscript titled “High-temperature annealed multi-walled carbon nanotubes as high-performance conductive agents for lithium-ion batteries” the author has done a good job explaining the manufacturing procedure and the results clearly with proper justification. The reviewer has a few questions,

1.      The author claims the CVD procedure used produces high-yield MWNTs. Can the author quantify the claim?

2.      Line 121 – “A certain mass of iron nitrate…”. Can the author specify the exact mass of each material used?

3.      Line 152 – what was the coating thickness?

 

4.      Can the author compare the electrochemical analysis with pristine CNTs (CNTs before annealing)? I think this could be a good comparison to show the improvements pre-annealing vs post-annealing.  

Author Response

  1. Added pictures and yields of MWNTs preparation using CVD method, see file for details.
  2. The mass of each substance has been added, see the document for details.
  3. The thickness of the coating is 0.019mm, see the document for details.
  4. Electrochemical data of the cell (NCM-CNT) prepared by adding impurity-free pristine MWNTs (slurry) as a conductive additive and adding its corresponding analysis are detailed in the manuscript (yellow section).

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The reviewed manuscript entitled: "High-Temperature Annealed Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as High Performance Conductive Agents for LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Lithium-Ion Batteries" deals with exploring high temperature annealed and demetallized MWCNTs and their utilization in preparation of conductive slurry with the use of micro sand milling technique. The obtained CNT slurry is further used in as conductive agents in LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (NCM) cathode materials by sand-mill dispersion and its performance of lithium-ion batteries was investigated. The results obtained showed that the high temperature annealing can effectively remove the residual metal impurities from MWNTs and the defects in MWNTs gradually decreases as the temperature rises. The MWCNTs used as conductive agents in LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2  cathode materials show excellent battery behaviors, which really provide a new insight for the development of high-performance novel conductive agent in lithium-ion batteries.

Few critical remarks:

In the Experimental part, please unbold the labelled abbreviations of CNT-2000 etc. 

I suggest combining Fig. 8 and 9 in one Figure and pls do not end the manuscript with blanc Figure and the following Conclusions. In the  Conclusion part end there is wrongly put irrelevant text.

Author Response

1. Already modified, please see the document for details.

2. Figures 8 and 9 have been merged and the irrelevant text at the end of the conclusion has been removed, plwase see document for details.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop