Next Article in Journal
Increasing the Lightweight Potential of Composite Cold Forging by Utilizing Magnesium and Granular Cores
Previous Article in Journal
Uniaxial-Pressure-Induced Release of Magnetic Frustration in a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet YbCuGe
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/met11010031
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Substitution of Y with Yb and Ce on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5

by
Hongxin Liao
1,2,
Taekyung Lee
3,
Jiangfeng Song
1,2,
Jonghyun Kim
1,2,* and
Fusheng Pan
1,2,*
1
College of Materials Science & Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010031
Submission received: 18 November 2020 / Revised: 21 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 25 December 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The microstructures and mechanical properties of the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-XREX (RE = Yb and Ce, X = 0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5) (wt.%) alloys were investigated in the present study. Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 is composed of three phases, namely, α-Mg, long-period stacking ordered (LPSO) phases, and intermetallic compounds. The content of the LPSO phases decreased with the addition of Ce and Yb, and no LPSO phases were detected in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5. The alloys containing the LPSO phases possessed a stratified microstructure and exhibited excellent mechanical properties. Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited the highest creep resistance and mechanical strength at both room temperature and 200 °C, owing to its suitable microstructure and high thermal stability. The yield strength of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 at room temperature was 358 MPa. The ultimate tensile strength of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 at room temperature and 200 °C was 453 MPa and 360 MPa, respectively.

1. Introduction

Magnesium alloys are the lightest metallic materials that are commercially utilized in the automotive industry to lower the emission of carbon dioxide that causes global warming [1,2,3]. However, these alloys exhibit low mechanical strength at both room temperature and high temperature, which restricts their application [4,5]. Therefore, there have been extensive studies on the development of techniques to optimize the mechanical properties of Mg alloys. The addition of certain alloying elements has been determined to be a convenient and efficient technique to increase the strength and ductility of Mg alloys [6,7].
The Mg-RE (RE—rare earth) series alloys have attracted significant attention in recent years owing to their outstanding heat resistance and mechanical properties [8,9,10]. Long-period stacking ordered (LPSO) phases, which possess a special structure and excellent strengthening ability, in Mg-Zn-Re alloys have become a subject of intense research [11]. Recently, Noda et al. [12] demonstrated the excellent mechanical properties of extruded Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 (wt.%) at 293–773 K. Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 consists of three phases, namely, α-Mg, LPSO, and intermetallic compounds. The variation in the content of Zn induces changes in the volume fractions of all the phases. Kim et al. [13] reported that each RE element exerted a unique influence on the volume fractions of the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds. As a result of the replacement of Y by different RE elements in Mg97Zn1Y2 alloys, the alloy with Ce and La exhibits higher mechanical properties with the existence of LPSO phases, but the alloys with Nd and Sm exhibit a lower strength because of the disappearance of the LPSO phases. Therefore, the addition of different RE elements induces variations in their microstructures and mechanical properties. It is necessary to investigate the effect of the addition of certain RE elements on the microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. This will facilitate the development of inexpensive and high-strength Mg alloys.
Yb and Ce are representative and inexpensive RE elements that are widely utilized in traditional Mg systems. The addition of these elements optimizes the microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg alloys [14,15,16]. Li et al. [17] reported that the addition of Yb increased the strength of hot-extruded Mg-8Gd-1.2Zn-0.5Zr via the precipitation strengthening of the Mg-Zn-Gd-Yb phases. Ce is one of the most cost-effective RE elements, and its addition optimizes the mechanical and extrusion properties of alloys [18]. Liu et al. [19] reported that the addition of Ce optimized the mechanical properties of Mg-Zn alloys via the formation of the Mg-Zn-Ce phase. The maximum solubility of Ce in Mg is approximately 0.52 wt.% at 592 °C. Such a low solubility facilitates the precipitation of the Ce-rich phases in Mg-Ce alloys during solidification. However, the substitution of Y in Mg97Zn1Y2 with Ce induces the partial transformation of the LPSO phases to compounds, thereby optimizing the mechanical properties [13].
The results of previous studies indicate that the strengthening ability of a composite structure of LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds is higher than that of a structure of only LPSO phases. The optimization of the mechanical properties of Mg alloys via the substitution of Y with Ce and Yb is a subject of high research value. However, the correlated investigations on this subject are limited. The variations in the volume fractions of the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds in the as-cast and as-extruded Mg alloys were investigated in this study. The tensile and creep properties of the extruded samples were tested at both room temperature and high temperature (200 °C). Finally, the effects of the substitution of Y with Ce and Yb on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 were analyzed and discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

Pure Mg, Zn, Y, Yb, and Ce were subjected to high-frequency induction melting under an Ar atmosphere at 730 °C. Subsequently, the melt was poured into steel molds; thus, ingots (diameter = 45 mm) with a nominal composition of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-XREX (RE = Yb and Ce, X = 0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5) (wt.%) alloys were produced. Thereafter, billets with a diameter and height of 42 and 100 mm, respectively, were cut from the cast ingots and extruded at 370 °C. The extrusion ram speed and extrusion ratio were 3.0 mm s−1 and 12:1, respectively.
All the samples were obtained from the middle segments of the initial ingots and the extruded samples. The microstructures of the alloys were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; JSM-7800F, Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in conjunction with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD; HKL Channel 5, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). All the specimens were wet ground to a 2000 grit finish using SiC paper before each experiment. The surfaces of the specimens were polished to a 0.1µm finish using ethanol as a lubricant for the FE-SEM and EBSD observations. The diameter and gauge length of the tensile test rods were 2.5 mm and 15 mm, respectively. The tensile tests were performed using an Instron-type tensile testing machine at room temperature and 200 °C. The rods were subjected to tensile testing (CMT5105, MTS Systems Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a strain rate of 10−3 s−1. The tensile yield strength (TYS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and elongation to fracture were averaged over at least three individual measurements. The phase composition, structure, and morphology were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/MAX-2500PC, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Tecnai G2 F20, FEI Company (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,), Hillsboro, OR, USA) was performed at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-XREX alloys. Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 comprised α-Mg, Mg12ZnY (LPSO phase), and Mg3Zn3Y2 (intermetallic compound). The intensity of the peaks of the LPSO phases decreased with the increase in the content of Yb and Ce. The peaks of the LPSO phases were absent in the XRD pattern of Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5. The primary second phases in Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Yb3.0 and Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5 were Mg2Yb and Mg3Zn3Y2. The intensity of the peak of Mg2Yb increased with the increase in the Yb content. The substitution of Y with Ce induced the disappearance of the peaks of Mg3Zn3Y2 and the appearance of the peaks of Mg12Ce. The intensity of the peaks of Mg12Ce increased with the increase in the Ce content.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the SEM micrographs of the as-cast Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-XREX alloys. The light and dark gray phases denote the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds (marked by an arrow), respectively. A coarse dendritic structure was formed by the continuous network of the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds. The volume fraction of the LPSO phases decreased significantly with the increase in the Yb and Ce content. The LPSO phases were not detected in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5, and this result was consistent with the XRD analysis. The XRD data indicated that the Mg3Zn3Y2 phases constituted the compounds in Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. The Mg2Yb phases were the primary constituents of the compounds in the Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys, while the Mg3Zn3Y2 and Mg12Ce phases were the primarily constituents of the compounds in the Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the SEM micrographs of the extruded alloys along the extrusion direction. Although the volume fractions of the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds remained unchanged, there was a significant variation in the morphology. The LPSO phases exhibited a transformation from a net-like to rod-like morphology, and they were uniformly distributed along the extrusion direction in all the samples. The compounds exhibited a morphological transformation from bulk to granular (particles) during extrusion. Furthermore, only the particles of Mg2Yb were detected in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5. These observations were consistent for the XRD and SEM analyses of the as-cast alloys.
The mechanical properties of the extruded alloys at room temperature and 200 °C are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. Mg3Zn3Y2 exhibited a TYS, UTS, and elongation of approximately 375 MPa, 425 MPa, and 5.2%, respectively. There was an initial increase and a subsequent decrease in the mechanical strength with the increase in the Yb and Ce content. This indicated that the substitution of Y with an optimal concentration of Yb and Ce increased the strength of the alloys. Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited the highest strength, while Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5 exhibited the lowest strength and the highest elongation. The strength and elongation at 200 °C were significantly lower and higher, respectively, than those at room temperature. Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited the maximum strength at 200 °C with a TYS and UTS of 330 MPa and 360 MPa, respectively. It was observed that Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited the highest strength at both room temperature and 200 °C.
The creep curves for the extruded alloys were obtained at 200 °C and 150 MPa and are presented in Figure 8. The curves depicted the first and second stages of creep deformation [20]. The effects of Yb and Ce on the creep rate of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 were discernible from the figure. There was an initial increase and a subsequent decrease in the creep resistance of the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys with the increase in the Yb and Ce content. The creep resistances of only Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5 were higher than the creep resistance of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. It was concluded that the creep resistance of the Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys was higher than that of the Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
The mechanical properties and creep resistance of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 were superior to those of the other alloys. EBSD analyses were performed to compare the crystallographic features of the extruded Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5, and the results are presented in Figure 9a,b. The color variation denotes the grain orientation, and the black grains denote the LPSO phases. A part of the worked α-Mg region, with coarse grains, and the dynamically recrystallized (DRXed) α-Mg region, with fine grains, existed in Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5. Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited an increase in the grain size after heat treatment at 400 °C for 1 h. Furthermore, the heat treatment induced static recrystallization in Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5, thereby resulting in the transformation of all the worked α-Mg grains to recrystallized grains [21]. Therefore, no worked α-Mg regions were detected in the heat-treated alloys, and the microstructure became uniform. The grains in Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 were finer than those in Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5, for both the as-extruded and heat-treated states [22].
Figure 10 shows the TEM micrographs of the extruded Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5. Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 primarily comprised α-Mg grains, intermetallic compounds, and LPSO phases. The rod-like LPSO phases were distributed within the grains (Figure 10a). Furthermore, two types of compounds were detected in the alloy; one was distributed in the form of particles at the grain boundaries, while the other existed as blocks within the α-Mg matrix and between the LPSO phases.

4. Discussion

Figure 11 shows the calculated volume fractions of α-Mg, the LPSO phases, and intermetallic compounds in the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys. MgZn5Y6.5 comprised 31.5 and 2.8 vol.% of the LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds, respectively. The content of the LPSO phases decreased from 24.4 to 5.2% with the increase in the Ce content from 1.5 to 4.5%. The addition of Yb also decreased the content of the LPSO phases, and no LPSO phases were detected in MgZn5Y2.0Yb4.5. The criteria for the formation of LPSO phases in the Mg-Zn-RE alloys are as follows [23]:
  • High solid solubility limit in Mg alloys.
  • Negative mixing enthalpy between Mg-RE and Zn-RE.
  • HCP structure at room temperature.
  • Higher atomic size of the RE atoms as compared to that of Mg.
The negative mixing enthalpy between Mg-RE and Zn-RE as well as the difference in the atomic sizes of Mg, Zn, and RE were similar for the addition of Ce and Yb. However, the solid solubility limits of Ce and Yb in magnesium are 0.66 and 3.3 wt.%, respectively, at the eutectic temperature [14]. The high solid solubility limit of Yb lowered the volume fraction of the intermetallic compounds in the Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloy; however, the effect on the volume fraction of the LPSO phases was negligible at a Yb content of 1.5 and 3.0 wt.%. Therefore, the volume fraction of the LPSO phases in the Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys was higher than that of the LPSO phases in the Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys. The LPSO phases were absent in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5. The XRD analysis indicated that Zn and Y formed a compound, Mg3Zn3Y2, instead of the LPSO phases. The underlying reason for this phenomenon needs further research.
According to the IPF maps (Figure 9), the average grain size of both the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 alloys is 1.5 μm. In fact, the average grain size of all the alloys is almost same, and this result excluded the effect of grain size on the strength, so the major factor to effect of mechanical properties is the second phases. Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 possessed a networked and stratified structure of LPSO phases and intermetallic compounds (Figure 4 and Figure 5). This structure was responsible for the high strength of these alloys. The mechanical strengths of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 were higher than the mechanical strength of MgZn5Y6.5 at both room temperature and 200 °C. A curve of the variation in the tensile yield strength with the volume fraction of the LPSO phases was plotted (Figure 12) to elucidate the effect of the Yb and Ce content on the mechanical properties of Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys. There was a marked increase in the TYS, with the increase in the content of the LPSO phase. The LPSO phases exhibit a unique mode of plastic deformation, known as kink deformation [24]. The deformation models of the LPSO phases and α-Mg are significantly different. Therefore, the deformation of the LPSO phases in the grains is incompatible with that of α-Mg. Consequently, the alloys containing the LPSO phases exhibit high strength [25]. Multiple researchers have reported that alloys containing the LPSO phases exhibit an extremely high strength [26,27]. The variation in the mechanical properties was primarily attributed to the volume fraction of the LPSO phases.
As shown in Figure 9, the worked Mg grains that existed in the Mg88.5Zn5Y5Ce1.5 and Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 alloys disappeared after the heat treatment at 400 °C for 1 h. This result indicated the presence of deformed storage energy inside the grains after extrusion. The heat treatment enabled the deformed storage energy to become the driving force for recrystallization nucleation. This induced the transformation of the worked Mg grains to recrystallized grains through a particulate-stimulated nucleation mechanism. The high-volume fraction of LPSO phases results in a significant stress transferred from the Mg matrix to the LPSO phases, which is much higher than the compounds [28]. Therefore, the Mg88.5Zn5Y5Ce1.5 alloy with low LPSO phases have much more strain energy to induce recrystallization than the MgZn5Y6.5 alloy, and leads to a finer grain size after heat treatment. The thermal stability of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 was higher than that of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 at high temperature, and Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 exhibited a high strength and creep resistance at 200 °C. The creep resistance of Mg88.5Zn5Y5Yb1.5 was higher than that of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. There was a decrease in the creep resistance with the increase in the content of Yb that substituted Y. The creep resistance of Mg88.5Zn5Y2Yb4.5 was markedly low, owing to the absence of the LPSO phases, thereby confirming the efficacy of the LPSO phases for increasing the creep resistance.
The Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys were classified into Type A and Type B (Figure 13). The LPSO phases were formed in the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-xCex alloys during solidification, and the volume fraction of the LPSO phases decreased with the increase in the Ce content (Type A). The variation rule for the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-xYbx alloys was the same as that for the Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5-xCex alloys; however, the LPSO phases disappeared at a Yb content of 4.5 wt.% (Type B). Mg88.5Zn5Y2Yb4.5 did not contain the LPSO phases; therefore, it exhibited a low strength, low creep resistance, and high elongation.

5. Conclusions

The microstructures and mechanical properties of the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys were investigated in this study. The results can be summarized as follows:
(1)
When the content of Ce and Yb in the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys increased, the content of the LPSO phases decreased during solidification. When the content of Y was low, the content of the LPSO phases in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Ce4.5 was also low. Furthermore, the LPSO phases did not exist in Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5.
(2)
The alloys that contained the LPSO phases exhibited a higher strength, higher creep resistance, and lower elongation than those exhibited by the alloys that did not contain the LPSO phases.
(3)
The creep resistance and the mechanical properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5 were superior to those of the other alloys at both room temperature and 200 °C. This was attributed to the suitable microstructure and high thermal stability of Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5.

Author Contributions

H.L., writing-original draft, data analysis, investigation and methodology; T.L., data analysis, supervision; J.S., data analysis, investigation and methodology; J.K., conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing-review and editing; F.P., conceptualization, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Joost, W.J.; Krajewski, P.E. Towards magnesium alloys for high-volume automotive applications. Scr. Mater. 2017, 128, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, Q.; Guan, K.; Li, B.; Meng, F.; Lv, S.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Meng, J. Coexistence of 14H and 18R-type long-period stacking ordered (LPSO) phases following a novel orientation relationship in a cast Mg-Al-RE-Zn alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 766, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, X.; Du, W.; Liu, K.; Wang, Z.; Li, S. Effect of trace addition of al on microstructure, texture and tensile ductility of Mg-6Zn-0.5Er alloy. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2016, 4, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Naghdi, F.; Mahmudi, R.; Kang, J.; Kim, H. Microstructure and high-temperature mechanical properties of the Mg- 4Zn- 0.5Ca alloy in the as-cast and aged conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 649, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bettles, C.J.; Gibson, M.A.; Venkatesan, K. Enhanced age-hardening behavious in Mg-4 wt.% Zn micro-alloyed with Ca. Scr. Mater. 2004, 51, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tong, T.; Zhang, F.; Liu, S.; Du, Y.; Li, K. Experimental investigation on the phase equilibria of the Mg-Sn-Ag system in the Mg-rich corner. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2017, 5, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liao, H.; Kim, J.; Liu, T.; Tang, A.; She, J.; Peng, P.; Pan, F. Effects of Mn addition on the microstructures, mechanical properties and work-hardening of Mg-1Sn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 754, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Z.J.; Huang, Y.D.; Dieringa, H.; Mendis, C.L.; Guan, R.G.; Hort, N.; Meng, J. High temperature mechanical behavior of an extruded Mg-11Gd-4.5Y-1Nd-1.5Zn-0.5Zr (wt%) alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 645, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Q.; Xiao, B.L.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, M.Y.; Ma, Z.Y. Exceptional high-strain-rate superplasticity in Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Zr alloy with long-period stacking ordered phase. Scr. Mater. 2013, 69, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yamasaki, M.; Sasaki, M.; Nishijima, M.; Hiraga, K.; Kawamura, Y. Formation of 14H long period stacking ordered structure and profuse stacking faults in Mg-Zn-Gd alloys during isothermal aging at high temperature. Acta Mater. 2007, 55, 6798–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Wu, R.; Hou, L.; Zhang, M. Recent developments in high-strength Mg-RE-based alloys: Focusing on Mg-Gd and Mg-Y systems. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2018, 6, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Noda, M.; Matsumoto, R.; Kawamura, Y. Forging induces changes in the formability and microstructure of extruded Mg96Zn2Y2 alloy with a long-period stacking order phase. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 563, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, J.; Kawamura, Y. Influence of Rare Earth Elements on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg97Zn1Y1RE1 Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 573, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, D.; Zhang, D.; Bu, F.; Li, X.; Li, B.; Yan, T.; Guan, K.; Yang, Q.; Liu, X.; Meng, J. Excellent ductility and strong work hardening effect of as-cast Mg-Zn-Zr-Yb alloy at room temperature. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 728, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, W.; Liu, Z.; He, H.; Cheng, N.; Li, X. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZK60-Yb magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 478, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, B.; Guan, K.; Yang, Q.; Niu, X.; Zhang, D.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Z.; Meng, J. Effects of 0.5 wt% Ce addition on microstructures and mechanical properties of a wrought Mg- 8Gd- 1.2Zn- 0.5Zr alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 763, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.S.; Guan, K.; Yang, Q.; Niu, X.D.; Zhang, D.D.; Lv, S.H.; Meng, F.Z.; Huang, Y.D.; Hort, N.; Meng, J. Microstructures and mechanical properties of a hot-extruded Mg8Gd3Yb1.2Zn0.5Zr (wt%) alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 776, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, H.; Kim, Y.M.; You, B.S.; Yu, H.S.; Park, S.H. Effects of cerium addition on the microstructure, mechanical properties and hot workability of ZK60 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 559, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Pan, F.; Tang, A.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Gao, S. Microstructure, texture, mechanical properties and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of Mg-Zn-Zr-Ce alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 669, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhua, S.M.; Abbotta, T.B.; Gibsona, M.A.; Nie, J.F.; Easton, M.A. The influence of minor Mn additions on creep resistance of die-cast Mg-Al-RE alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 682, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, D.; Tan, Z.; Huo, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Z.; Yang, X. Dynamic recrystallization behaviors of Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Zr alloy with different morphologies and distributions of LPSO phases. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 715, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Robson, J.D.; Henry, D.T.; Davis, B. Particle effects on recrystallization in magnesium-manganese alloys: Particle-stimulated nucleation. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 2739–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kawamura, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Inoue, A.; Masumoto, T. Rapidly Solidified Powder Metallurgy Mg97Zn1Y2Alloys with Excellent Tensile Yield Strength above 600 MPa. Mater. Trans. 2001, 42, 1172–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gao, H.; Ikeda, K.-I.; Morikawa, T.; Higashida, K.; Nakashima, H. Analysis of kink boundaries in deformed synchronized long-period stacking ordered magnesium alloys. Mater. Lett. 2015, 146, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Homma, T.; Kunito, N.; Kamado, S. Fabrication of extraordinary high-strength magnesium alloy by hot extrusion. Scr. Mater. 2009, 61, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Wang, G.; Meng, F.; Hort, N.; Meng, J. Fabrication of a high strength Mg- 11Gd- 4.5Y- 1Nd- 1.5Zn- 0.5Zr (wt%) alloy by thermomechanical treatments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 622, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Rong, W.; Wu, Y.; Peng, L. A super high-strength Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloy fabricated by hot extrusion and strain aging. Mater. Des. 2019, 169, 107666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pérez, P.; Medina, J.C.; Garces, G.; Adeva, P. Influence of Y/CeMM ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg95Zn2(Y, CeMM)3 alloys. Intermetallics 2012, 31, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Metals 11 00031 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Mg-Zn-Y-Ce and Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Mg-Zn-Y-Ce and Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Metals 11 00031 g001
Metals 11 00031 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM microstructure of the as-cast alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Yb3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5.
Figure 2. SEM microstructure of the as-cast alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Yb3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5.
Metals 11 00031 g002
Metals 11 00031 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM microstructure of the as-cast alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Ce 3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Ce 4.5.
Figure 3. SEM microstructure of the as-cast alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Ce 3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Ce 4.5.
Metals 11 00031 g003
Metals 11 00031 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM microstructure of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Yb3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5.
Figure 4. SEM microstructure of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Yb1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5Yb3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0Yb4.5.
Metals 11 00031 g004
Metals 11 00031 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM microstructure of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5 Ce 3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0 Ce 4.5.
Figure 5. SEM microstructure of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5; (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y3.5 Ce 3.0; (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y2.0 Ce 4.5.
Metals 11 00031 g005
Metals 11 00031 g006 550
Figure 6. Mechanical properties of the extruded alloys at room temperature: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys; (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Figure 6. Mechanical properties of the extruded alloys at room temperature: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys; (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Metals 11 00031 g006
Metals 11 00031 g007 550
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of the extruded alloys at 200 °C: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys; (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of the extruded alloys at 200 °C: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys; (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys.
Metals 11 00031 g007
Metals 11 00031 g008 550
Figure 8. Creep curves of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys, and (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys, as measured at 200 °C and 150 MPa.
Figure 8. Creep curves of the extruded alloys: (a) Mg-Zn-Y-Ce alloys, and (b) Mg-Zn-Y-Yb alloys, as measured at 200 °C and 150 MPa.
Metals 11 00031 g008
Metals 11 00031 g009 550
Figure 9. Inverse pole figure (IPF) maps of extruded (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; heat-treated (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5.
Figure 9. Inverse pole figure (IPF) maps of extruded (a) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and (b) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5; heat-treated (c) Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5 and (d) Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5.
Metals 11 00031 g009
Metals 11 00031 g010 550
Figure 10. TEM micrographs of the extruded Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5: (a) morphology of LPSO phases and (b) morphology of compounds.
Figure 10. TEM micrographs of the extruded Mg88.5Zn5Y5.0Ce1.5: (a) morphology of LPSO phases and (b) morphology of compounds.
Metals 11 00031 g010
Metals 11 00031 g011 550
Figure 11. Volume fraction of the α-Mg, LPSO phases, and compounds in Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys.
Figure 11. Volume fraction of the α-Mg, LPSO phases, and compounds in Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys.
Metals 11 00031 g011
Metals 11 00031 g012 550
Figure 12. Variation in the tensile yield strength with the volume fraction of the LPSO phases.
Figure 12. Variation in the tensile yield strength with the volume fraction of the LPSO phases.
Metals 11 00031 g012
Metals 11 00031 g013 550
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the microstructures of the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the microstructures of the Mg-Zn-Y-RE alloys.
Metals 11 00031 g013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, H.; Lee, T.; Song, J.; Kim, J.; Pan, F. Effects of Substitution of Y with Yb and Ce on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. Metals 2021, 11, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010031

AMA Style

Liao H, Lee T, Song J, Kim J, Pan F. Effects of Substitution of Y with Yb and Ce on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5. Metals. 2021; 11(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Hongxin, Taekyung Lee, Jiangfeng Song, Jonghyun Kim, and Fusheng Pan. 2021. "Effects of Substitution of Y with Yb and Ce on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg88.5Zn5Y6.5" Metals 11, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop