Next Article in Journal
Public Discourse on Human Trafficking in International Issue Arenas
Next Article in Special Issue
Eating Serial: Beatrice Lindsay, Vegetarianism, and the Tactics of Everyday Life in the Late Nineteenth Century
Previous Article in Journal
Let the Weakest Link Go! Empirical Explorations on the Relative Importance of Weak and Strong Ties on Social Networking Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eating Animals to Build Rapport: Conducting Research as Vegans or Vegetarians

Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought

Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Academic Editor: Chloë Taylor
Societies 2015, 5(1), 1-11;
Received: 10 November 2014 / Accepted: 23 December 2014 / Published: 24 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alimentary Relations, Animal Relations)
In this paper, I argue that animal domestication, speciesism, and other modern human-animal interactions in North America are possible because of and through the erasure of Indigenous bodies and the emptying of Indigenous lands for settler-colonial expansion. That is, we cannot address animal oppression or talk about animal liberation without naming and subsequently dismantling settler colonialism and white supremacy as political machinations that require the simultaneous exploitation and/or erasure of animal and Indigenous bodies. I begin by re-framing animality as a politics of space to suggest that animal bodies are made intelligible in the settler imagination on stolen, colonized, and re-settled Indigenous lands. Thinking through Andrea Smith’s logics of white supremacy, I then re-center anthropocentrism as a racialized and speciesist site of settler coloniality to re-orient decolonial thought toward animality. To critique the ways in which Indigenous bodies and epistemologies are at stake in neoliberal re-figurings of animals as settler citizens, I reject the colonial politics of recognition developed in Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka’s recent monograph, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (Oxford University Press 2011) because it militarizes settler-colonial infrastructures of subjecthood and governmentality. I then propose a decolonized animal ethic that finds legitimacy in Indigenous cosmologies to argue that decolonization can only be reified through a totalizing disruption of those power apparatuses (i.e., settler colonialism, anthropocentrism, white supremacy, and neoliberal pluralism) that lend the settler state sovereignty, normalcy, and futurity insofar as animality is a settler-colonial particularity. View Full-Text
Keywords: decolonization; animal ethics; settler colonialism; white supremacy; neoliberalism decolonization; animal ethics; settler colonialism; white supremacy; neoliberalism
MDPI and ACS Style

Belcourt, B.-R. Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought. Societies 2015, 5, 1-11.

AMA Style

Belcourt B-R. Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought. Societies. 2015; 5(1):1-11.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Belcourt, Billy-Ray. 2015. "Animal Bodies, Colonial Subjects: (Re)Locating Animality in Decolonial Thought" Societies 5, no. 1: 1-11.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop