Next Article in Journal
How and When Do Individuating Information and Social Category Information Influence Implicit Judgments of Individual Members of Known Social Groups? A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Constructing Authenticity in Digital Landscapes: Deion Sanders’s Social Media Presence and Its Impact on Fan Perceptions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Role of Food Security in Stunting Prevention Efforts in the Bondowoso Community, Indonesia

1
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65142, Indonesia
2
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
3
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
4
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
5
Agribusiness Department, Syarif Hidayatullah State University Jakarta, South Tangerang 15412, Indonesia
6
Graduate School of Business, University of Zambia, Lusaka 50516, Zambia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2025, 15(5), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050135
Submission received: 30 March 2025 / Revised: 6 May 2025 / Accepted: 12 May 2025 / Published: 14 May 2025

Abstract

:
Stunting—defined by the World Health Organization as a height-for-age z-score < −2 SD—signals chronic undernutrition that impairs both physical and cognitive development. This study investigates how the three pillars of food security (availability, access, utilization) influence stunting prevention efforts in the Bondowoso Regency, East Java, Indonesia. A cross-sectional survey of 113 mothers of stunted children (0–59 months) was analysed with Structural Equation Modelling using Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM). The model reveals significant positive paths from food security pillars to composite stunting prevention behaviours (β = 0.18–0.86, p < 0.05), with availability emerging as the strongest predictor. These findings highlight food security as a lever for reducing the local stunting prevalence (local 32% vs. national 24.4%) and provide evidence for community-based nutrition programmes in similar agrarian districts. Strengthening food security is therefore essential to safeguarding child well-being in vulnerable Indonesian communities.

1. Introduction

Stunting is a form of linear growth failure, scientifically defined as a height-for-age z-score (HAZ) below −2 standard deviations from the WHO Child Growth Standards. It results from chronic undernutrition, recurrent infections, and poor-quality caregiving environments [1,2,3,4]. Beyond restricted stature, stunting impairs immune function, cognitive development, academic performance, and long-term earning potential [5].
The stunting process begins when a child’s body consistently lacks sufficient macronutrients (e.g., protein and energy) and micronutrients (e.g., iron, zinc, and vitamin A) or when nutrient absorption is hindered by repeated infections, such as diarrhoea or respiratory illnesses. These challenges, combined with unsupportive environmental and socioeconomic conditions, gradually hinder a child’s physical growth. Maternal nutritional status and health during pregnancy also play a vital role in determining the initial risk of stunting [6,7,8].
Stunting has long-term consequences, including impaired physical and cognitive development, lower educational achievement, reduced economic productivity, and heightened risk of chronic disease—factors that perpetuate intergenerational poverty. The prevention of stunting therefore requires a holistic approach, including improved maternal and child nutrition, exclusive breastfeeding, access to clean water and sanitation, basic health services, and robust food security and diversification programs. Interventions are most effective during the first 1000 days of life [7,8].
Food security—defined by the sustained availability, accessibility, and utilization of safe, nutritious food—has consistently been linked to improved child linear growth outcomes [9,10,11]. When one or more of these pillars is compromised, nutritional deficits, infection risk, and inadequate caregiving often intersect to hinder optimal growth during early childhood.
Tjenemundan et al. [1] highlighted the benefits of enhancing food security through community participation. Interventions such as nutrition education, homestead gardens, and food parcel distribution significantly increase awareness and strengthen community-driven nutrition efforts. Pardede and Saraan [12] further emphasized the importance of integrated food security strategies, noting that increased food production, dietary diversification, and nutrition outreach have reduced stunting in targeted groups. Additional feeding programs for toddlers and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers also play a key role in improving nutritional intake and preventing stunting.
Community-based initiatives—particularly nutrition education, homestead gardening, and targeted feeding—have shown promising results in several Indonesian districts [1,12]. However, no prior study has systematically examined how the three core pillars of food security jointly influence multidomain stunting prevention behaviours at the village level in East Java. This evidence gap provides the rationale for the present study.
Based on the 2022 Indonesian Nutrition Status Survey (SSGI) report, the prevalence of stunting in Indonesia is still at 24.4%, indicating that this problem is still a serious national challenge and requires comprehensive and sustainable intervention [13]. At the provincial level, East Java recorded a stunting prevalence of 19.2%, which, although lower than the national average, still places it as one of the provinces with a high burden of stunting.
Bondowoso Regency—specifically Wonosari District—reported one of the highest stunting rates in East Java at 32.1% in 2023 (internal data from the Bondowoso District Health Service, 2023). Although the region maintains year-round agricultural production, high rural poverty (17%) and low dietary diversity have contributed to the stunting burden. Wonosari District, composed of 12 villages, was selected for this study due to its high stunting prevalence, patterns of food insecurity, and representative rural characteristics. Seven villages with the highest stunting rates were sampled, with 161 stunted children identified, of whom 113 were selected as respondents.
Food security is a condition wherein a community or nation can ensure equitable access to adequate, safe, and nutritious food for all individuals. This includes both the physical availability of food and fair access to it [11,14]. Robust food security helps prevent stunting and other nutrition-related conditions by ensuring that children receive the nutrients necessary for growth and development [9,15]. Food diversification is also an important component in achieving good food security and preventing stunting. By consuming a variety of foods, children have access to a variety of different nutrients necessary for optimal growth. Food diversification helps avoid deficiencies in certain nutrients and achieve a good nutritional balance [16,17].
Furthermore, food quality and safety—through proper handling and chemical-free production—are essential to sustaining a nutritious diet [18]. Against this backdrop, the present study applies a cross-sectional SEM-PLS design to investigate the direct effects of food availability, access, and utilization on four composite stunting prevention behaviours among 113 mothers of stunted children in Wonosari Subdistrict. This research aims to clarify the relationship between food security dimensions and stunting prevention and to underscore the importance of food security as a cornerstone of child health in rural Indonesia.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Stunting Prevention Efforts

Effective stunting prevention hinges on an integrated “1000-day” package that starts before conception and continues until a child’s second birthday. Core elements include exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months, timely and diverse complementary feeding (MP-ASI), maternal nutrition counselling, and full immunization—each of which has been shown to reduce height-for-age deficits in Indonesian cohorts [11,15].
Several interventions have been implemented to prevent stunting, including supplementary-feeding programmes that supply additional nutrition to malnourished children and improve their growth [13]. The effectiveness of such programmes depends on feed quality and consistency. Community-empowerment initiatives—nutrition education, home-garden cultivation, and sanitation improvements—have also proved effective [1].
Randomized and quasi-experimental studies in Java and Sulawesi confirm that community-managed supplementary-feeding schemes combined with home-garden promotion and hygiene classes reduce stunting by 3–6 percentage points within twelve months [1,12,19]. Caregiver feeding style is a strong mediator between food availability and actual child intake; restrictive or coercive practices negate diet-diversity gains [5]. Indonesian evidence shows that responsive-feeding training delivered through Integrated Health Service Post (Posyandu) cadres increased Minimum Dietary Diversity compliance from 34% to 61% in six months [20].
Toddlers’ eating behaviour strongly influences nutritional intake. Parental practices—such as coercing a child to eat or restricting food variety—can impair nutrition and growth [4,5,21]. Children’s individual food preferences must also be considered; parents should offer a range of nutritious foods to ensure a balanced diet. A supportive family environment that models healthy eating can positively shape children’s food choices.
Beyond diet, deficits in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) trigger environmental enteric dysfunction that limits nutrient absorption [22]. A meta-analysis across 13 Indonesian districts found that improved household latrines and ≥2 daily handwashing events were associated with an adjusted 18% reduction in stunting risk [23]. Poor sanitation and hygiene can lead to recurrent infections, which interfere with nutrient absorption and growth. Poor sanitation can cause recurrent infections that impede nutrient uptake and growth. Essential WASH practices include access to safe drinking water, proper handwashing before meals and after defecation, and sound waste management to prevent contamination [23,24,25].
Collectively, these studies demonstrate effective interventions; however, few have modelled how the pillars of food security interact with these behavioural domains. The present study therefore tests a structural model that links availability, access, and utilization to four prevention-behaviour clusters within a single agrarian district.

2.2. Food Security

Food security—operationalized as availability, access, and utilization—accounts for substantial variation in child growth outcomes across low- and middle-income countries. In Indonesian agricultural zones, households in the highest food security tertile exhibit HAZ scores that are, on average, 0.46 SD higher than those of food-insecure peers [13]. Seasonal availability shocks during the pre-harvest “lean” period have been linked to HAZ declines of 0.2 SD in East Java.
Adequate food security guarantees the availability of, access to, and utilization of sufficient, nutritious food for all community members—particularly pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and children [20]. A diverse and reliable food supply is vital for meeting nutritional needs. Sustainable local food production underpins availability, while efficient distribution systems ensure food is accessible to all population groups [26].
Limited physical and economic access amplifies stunting risk even where aggregate food supplies are adequate; a 2023 SEM-GSCA study across 112 Indonesian districts found that access elasticity (β = 0.37) exceeded that of availability (β = 0.29) [27]. Food access includes the economic and physical ability to obtain sufficient and nutritious food. Poverty and economic inequality often limit people’s access to nutritious food [26,28].
Utilization—reflected in dietary diversity, safe preparation, and child-care practices—mediates the access. Putra et al. [9] reported that each additional food group consumed raised the HAZ by 0.11 SD after adjusting for infection burden. Food utilization includes the ability to use available food to meet nutritional needs. Proper utilization entails using available food to meet nutritional needs, applying safe processing methods to minimize nutrient loss, and maintaining diverse diets to secure the full range of nutrients required for optimal growth [18,27,29].
Existing Indonesian studies typically isolate single pillars or behaviours. No research has yet quantified the combined effects of all three pillars on a multidimensional prevention index, creating a knowledge gap that this study addresses for Bondowoso’s high-burden villages.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Research Model Development

The research model (Figure 1) posits that the three pillars of food security—availability, access, and utilization—directly influence four clusters of stunting prevention behaviour. This specification is grounded in evidence that local food diversity, household income, and caregiver knowledge jointly shape linear growth trajectories among Indonesian toddlers [13,20,30,31]. In the model, each pillar is specified as a first-order reflective construct, while the prevention package is modelled as a second-order formative construct.
Numerous studies highlight the need to address food security at both community and household levels to prevent stunting effectively. In agricultural settings, maintaining local food security is crucial for lowering stunting rates. A diverse and adequate food supply—particularly during the pre-harvest lean season—is essential. Economic factors, such as household income, strongly influence food security and thereby affect stunting prevalence [13,30]. At the family level, access to diverse, nutritious, and affordable foods is vital. Training programmes for parents and Posyandu cadres on complementary food preparation have proved effective in boosting nutritional intake and reducing stunting [20,31].
Education and public awareness are additional pillars for enhancing food security and preventing stunting. Community-wide nutrition education ensures that children gain access to nutrient-rich foods, thereby lowering stunting rates [9]. Multiple studies report a strong association between household food security and stunting incidence. Strengthening household food security remains the primary strategy for combating stunting, even when other factors—such as macronutrient intake—show no significant correlation [15].
Accordingly, it is hypothesized that each food security pillar exerts a positive and direct effect on the composite prevention index (H1–H3). This hypothesis rests on the premise that guaranteeing access to diverse, nutritious foods, improving food quality and availability, and raising nutrition awareness are critical for reducing stunting.

3.2. Data Collection

This study was conducted in January 2025 in Wonosari District, Bondowoso Regency, where the 2023 district health census recorded a stunting prevalence of 32.1%—substantially higher than the provincial average of 21.3%. The seven villages with the highest case counts were purposively selected (Section 3.5). Stunting status had been determined by village midwives and health cadres using routine Posyandu growth-monitoring records. Households qualified as respondents if at least one child had been identified as stunted in these monthly records; height-for-age z-scores were calculated with WHO Anthro 3.2 software. A structured questionnaire was administered face to face by trained enumerators to collect information on (i) preventive practices, (ii) household food security, and (iii) sociodemographic characteristics.
Prior to data collection, a preliminary survey was carried out in collaboration with local health workers and village authorities to verify that the research tools were context-appropriate and would foster respondent engagement. Community feedback guided the design of a 27-item, 5-point Likert questionnaire (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) aimed at capturing stunting-related issues in depth. Content validity was reviewed by three public health experts, and a pilot test with 30 mothers (excluded from the final sample) produced Cronbach’s α values ≥ 0.80 for all scales, after which minor wording adjustments were made.
Data were collected face to face by trained enumerators, supported by community health-centre staff and village officials. Feedback from respondents highlighted the need to clarify the wording of several items and simplify the language; the question order was also adjusted to enhance interview flow. This iterative process refined the final instrument and ensured that the questionnaire was culturally appropriate and easily understood by the participants.

3.3. Subjects

This study was carried out in Bondowoso Regency, which comprises 23 subdistricts. Wonosari District—selected for its elevated stunting prevalence—contains 12 villages. Of these, the seven villages with the highest stunting counts were included in the sample. Posyandu records identified 161 children (0–59 months) classified as stunted in Wonosari; these children constituted the study population.
From the register of 161 stunted children (0–59 months), primary caregivers—specifically mothers—were selected as respondents, given that stunting prevention occurs mainly within the first 1000 days and mothers are the principal decision-makers for child feeding and hygiene.
The 0–59-month age range was selected because toddlerhood represents the period most vulnerable to growth and developmental disorders; the first 1000 days are widely recognized as the “golden window” for effective stunting interventions.
In addition, signs of stunting can be observed and measured accurately in this age group through routine growth monitoring. Including children up to 59 months old also captures those who have moved beyond the initial intervention period yet still exhibit the long-term effects of chronic malnutrition.

3.4. Variables and Indicators

For structural model analysis, each latent variable is represented by a set of indicators denoted by abbreviations for ease of reference. Table 1 lists the following codes: STGs (stunting prevention indicators), AV (availability), AC (access), and UT (utilization). The table systematically pairs each latent variable with its indicator codes, forming the basis for measurement in the analysis model.

3.5. Sampling Strategy

Using the Krejcie–Morgan formula (Table 2) [32] for a population of 161 stunted children, a minimum sample of 113 respondents was required. Proportional-quota sampling—adjusted with a cluster-robust design effect of 1.2—allocated quotas to the seven Wonosari villages with the highest stunting counts. All eligible mothers of stunted toddlers were approached until the quotas were met (non-response = 8%), and design-based χ2 tests confirmed the absence of a significant cluster bias (p > 0.10).
Posyandu registers identified the 161 stunted children (0–59 months) across Wonosari’s 12 villages. The seven highest-burden villages were therefore selected, and sample quotas were distributed in proportion to each village’s caseload; Table 3 presents the final allocation. This purposive, proportionally weighted design ensured representative coverage of the district’s stunting hotspots while maintaining statistical efficiency.

3.6. Data Analysis

Data analysis in this research was carried out using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) technique from Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with Smart-PLS 3.0. PLS was chosen because it suited the exploratory nature of this research. PLS path modelling provides a powerful solution, especially when the primary objective is prediction, the model is relatively complex, the sample size is small, and there are few dependent variables. Model assessment proceeded in two stages: (i) measurement model—factor loadings, composite reliability, AVE, and Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio; (ii) structural model—β-coefficients and t-values from 5 000-sample bootstrapping. The Standardized Root-Mean-Square Residual (SRMR) is reported to provide an overall fit index (acceptable if <0.08) [20].

4. Results

Based on the existing research objectives and questions, as well as to evaluate the proposed hypothesis, analysis was carried out using Structural Equation Modelling with the following research model.

4.1. PLS-SEM Analysis

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (SmartPLS 3.0) was chosen for its robustness with moderate samples and non-normal data. A post hoc power calculation (effect size = 0.15, α = 0.05, three predictors) returned 0.87, exceeding the 0.80 benchmark. The overall model fit was adequate (SRMR = 0.064 < 0.08).
The model developed based on Research Model Development in Smart-PLS 3.0 was evaluated in two stages; namely, the measurement model was analysed to assess the reliability and validity of the construct, and the structural model was analysed to check the significance of the path coefficients in the research model.

4.1.1. Measurement Model

PLS-SEM was employed to validate the measurement model. Reliability and convergent validity were confirmed with composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE), while discriminant validity was assessed via HTMT ratios and the Fornell–Larcker criterion. SmartPLS provided factor loadings, CR, and AVE estimates; all VIF values for availability, access, and utilization ranged from 1.42 to 2.11, well below the multicollinearity threshold of 3.0.
All factor loadings exceeded 0.50 (Table 4, Figure 2). The AVE values ranged from 0.50 to 0.90, and the CR values ranged from 0.80 to 0.96, surpassing the recommended thresholds (AVE ≥ 0.50; CR ≥ 0.70). The HTMT ratios were ≤0.83, indicating satisfactory discriminant validity. Fornell–Larcker analysis (Table 5) showed that the square root of each construct’s AVE exceeded its inter-construct correlations, further confirming discriminant validity. Collectively, these results indicate that the measurement model meets accepted reliability and validity criteria, providing a sound basis for subsequent structural analysis.

4.1.2. Structural Model

Hypothesis testing in this research was carried out using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. The structural model was evaluated to assess model quality and test research hypotheses through a bootstrapping process, using a two-tailed t-test at a significance level of 5%. The path coefficient was considered significant if the t-value was greater than 1.96.
Table 6 and Figure 3 present the structural model results. Most paths achieved statistical significance, thereby supporting the study hypotheses. For instance, access (AC) exerted a positive effect on Toddler Eating Behaviour (EBT) (β = 0.258; t = 5.397; p < 0.001), explaining 46% of the variance in EBT (R2 = 0.46; f2 = 0.08). Enhanced access to food resources therefore promotes healthier eating patterns among toddlers, a critical factor in stunting prevention.
However, not all path coefficients support the hypothesis. The relationship between AC and Interventions to Prevent Stunting (IPSs) is not significant (original sample = 0.038, t-value = 0.700; p = 0.484), indicating that access alone is not strong enough to influence the effectiveness of stunting interventions. This implies that other factors may play a greater role in the success of this intervention. Likewise, the relationship between AC and Sanitation and Hygiene Practices (SHPs) was not significant (original sample = 0.024, t-value = 0.273; p = 0.785), indicating that access does not have a substantial impact on sanitation practices. This pattern mirrors findings from Dewi et al. [27] where hygiene behaviour was mediated by maternal knowledge rather than physical access.
In contrast, resource availability (AV) shows a strong influence on several variables. The relationship between AV and EBT is significant, with an original sample of 0.584 and a t-value of 6.809 (p = 0.000), supporting the hypothesis that availability directly influences eating behaviour. This highlights the important role of ensuring a steady supply of nutritious food in establishing healthy eating patterns. The relationships between AV and Health Preventive Practices (HPPs), IPSs, and SHPs were also significant, with original sample values of 0.597, 0.856, and 0.633, respectively, all with p values of 0.000. These findings emphasize the importance of resource availability in improving Health Prevention Practices, stunting interventions, and Sanitation and Hygiene Practices. The strong path coefficients indicate that availability is an important factor in supporting this research hypothesis. Effect sizes were large (f2 = 0.33–0.65), emphasizing the primacy of a diverse and steady food supply.
In contrast, utilization (UT) shows a more complex picture. The relationship between UT and EBT is not significant (original sample = 0.127, t-value = 1.183; p = 0.238), indicating that utilization does not directly influence eating behaviour. This suggests that although resources are available, the way they are utilized may not be optimal in influencing eating habits. Then, the relationship between UT and IPSs shows a negative coefficient (−0.109) with a t-value of 1.005 (p = 0.315), indicating that utilization is not significant for stunting prevention interventions. Finally, the relationship between UT and SHPs was not significant (original sample = 0.178, t-value = 1.598; p = 0.111), indicating that although utilization influences Sanitation and Hygiene Practices, this influence is not strong enough to be concluded statistically. A possible explanation is that utilization operates through unmeasured variables—namely nutrition education and cultural feeding norms—suggesting a need for extended models in future longitudinal work.
Overall, these findings confirm that food security plays an important role in supporting efforts to address stunting, with variations in the specific impacts of various factors. The significant contribution of availability (AV) and access (AC) highlights the importance of these variables in stunting prevention. Health Prevention Practices (HPPs) and Interventions to Prevent Stunting (IPSs) show a strong contribution to food security, while Toddler Eating Behaviour (EBT) and Sanitation and Hygiene Practices (SHPs) show more varied influences.
The research results show that the hypothesis about the positive impact of food security on stunting prevention is largely confirmed. Access (AC) has a significant influence on Toddler Eating Behaviour (EBT), which supports stunting prevention by ensuring toddlers receive adequate nutrition. Availability (AV) shows a strong influence on EBT, Health Prevention Practices (HPPs), Interventions to Prevent Stunting (IPSs), and Sanitation and Hygiene Practices (SHPs), highlighting the importance of adequate food supplies. Meanwhile, utilization (UT) shows a varied but significant influence on HPPs, indicating the importance of the appropriate use of resources in health practices. Overall, access to and availability of food resources play a key role in stunting prevention, and effective utilization is also important to achieve optimal results.
Figure 4 shows the effect of food security on stunting prevention behaviour in Bondowoso. AC exerted a medium effect (β = 0.26, p < 0.001) on Toddler Eating Behaviour, emphasizing the need for regular, affordable access to nutrient-dense foods for children under five years old. AV produced the largest path coefficients (β = 0.58–0.86), underscoring that a stable and diversified local food supply is the strongest lever for diet diversity, hygiene actions, and the uptake of community nutrition services. UT influenced only Health Prevention Practices (β = 0.23) and did not reach significance for diet or WASH outcomes, suggesting that utilization may be mediated by caregiver knowledge and cultural norms not captured in this model. Overall, our SEM results align with recent Indonesian and global studies, reinforcing food security as a foundation for multisectoral stunting strategies.

5. Discussion

The prevalence of stunting in Bondowoso (32.1%) is significantly higher than the national average (24.4%), underscoring the need for interventions tailored to local contexts. Consistent with multi-district studies in Java [13] and Sulawesi [1], our model confirms that improved household food security is associated with increased multidomain prevention practices and a reduced risk of stunting.
This study highlights the critical role of food security in preventing stunting in the Bondowoso community, Indonesia. Stunting is a severe public health concern that affects children’s growth and development. Our findings support the research hypothesis by demonstrating a significant relationship between food security and the effectiveness of stunting prevention efforts. Improved food security is associated with lower stunting rates, emphasizing the importance of stable access to nutritious food. In this context, food security includes the availability of, and access to, diverse and safe food, along with public education and awareness about the importance of nutrition. These findings reinforce earlier empirical evidence, such as that presented by Ruel et al. [33], which highlights the potential of food security interventions to reduce stunting in low- and middle-income countries.
Our findings align with Dewi et al. [27] who found that a one-unit increase in the food access score reduced the odds of stunting by 19%. The significant AC → EBT and AV → IPSs paths (β = 0.26 and 0.86, respectively) suggest that economic access and physical availability influence different behavioural pathways—dietary diversity and program participation. Complementary breastfeeding training, delivered by Posyandu cadres as recommended by Surmita et al. [20], remains an effective strategy in rural agricultural areas. The emphasis on empowering mothers as primary caregivers in feeding and hygiene practices is consistent with the findings of Bhutta et al. [34], who showed that family-based nutrition interventions are most effective when mothers are provided with adequate knowledge and access to resources.
Strengthening food security at both the household and community levels has proven essential in reducing stunting rates. Economic factors, such as household income, significantly influence food security and the prevalence of stunting [13,30]. Training programs for parents on complementary food preparation have shown promising outcomes in improving nutritional intake and reducing stunting [20,31]. Education and public awareness are also crucial in enhancing food security. Informing communities about the importance of nutrition ensures that children have access to nutrient-rich foods, thereby lowering the risk of stunting [9]. Numerous studies have confirmed the strong relationship between household food security and stunting [15]. This study also aligns with the findings of Pakaya, Kadir, and Kasim, [35] who emphasized that a multisectoral approach integrating nutrition, sanitation, and food security interventions is more effective than sectoral strategies alone in reducing stunting prevalence.
While AC and AV demonstrated medium-to-large effect sizes (f2 ≥ 0.15), UT’s influence was more nuanced: it predicted Health Prevention Practices but did not significantly affect toddler diet or sanitation behaviours. Similar attenuation patterns have been documented in Ethiopian cohorts, where utilization effects were mediated by maternal nutrition knowledge [16]. This pattern suggests that cognitive and behavioural factors—absent from our current model—shape how households convert resources into child-focused actions. As noted by [36], effective stunting interventions must incorporate social and behavioural dimensions at both the family and community levels as a critical component of stunting reduction strategies.
AV exerted the strongest total effect (Σβ = 2.67), reinforcing calls for the village-level diversification of staple and protein sources. A recent quasi-experiment in West Java showed that maize–soybean intercropping combined with small-livestock support reduced moderate stunting by five percentage points in one year [28]. AV shows a strong influence on several variables such as EBT, COGS, IPSs, and SHPs. This emphasizes the importance of ensuring a stable supply of nutritious food to support healthy eating patterns and good health practices.
Meanwhile, resource utilization (UT) only has a significant influence on HPPs, which shows the importance of using appropriate resources in supporting the health of children under five. The non-significant UT → IPSs/SHPs paths may reflect measurement limits (self-report bias) or the absence of cultural variables (e.g., food taboos). Future longitudinal designs should incorporate objective diet-diversity scores and qualitative probes into feeding norms.
Overall, this research confirms that comprehensive and integrated factors, including food availability, access, and utilization, are critical to improving the health and well-being of children in communities vulnerable to stunting. Academically, this study contributes to strengthening the conceptual framework regarding food security and stunting at the microlevel (household), which has so far mostly been studied at the macro- or national scale.
Policy implications that can be implemented based on the results of this research include the following: a three-year action package for Wonosari could combine (i) food availability—subsidized orange-fleshed sweet-potato seed and small-ruminant starter kits; (ii) food access—conditional cash transfers for households below the poverty line tied to growth-monitoring visits; and (iii) food utilization—monthly cooking demos and WASH clinics led by Posyandu cadres. The indicative costs (USD 75,000 per village) and key performance indicators (≥25% increase in diet-diversity score; stunting reduction ≥3 pp y−1) align with the East Java nutrition-convergence roadmap.
The limitations and future work related to this research include a reliance on caregiver self-reports, the moderate sample size, and the absence of cultural moderators, which may limit external validity. Triangulation with 24 h dietary recalls and a planned 2026 follow-up survey will address these gaps. Despite these caveats, our findings strengthen the evidence that boosting availability and access—while embedding utilization within culturally attuned education—offers the most realistic route to cutting stunting in rural East Java.
Overall, food security is key in preventing stunting. By ensuring good availability of, utilization of, and access to nutritious food, we can create an environment that supports the healthy growth and development of children, as well as reduce the stunting rates in society.

6. Conclusions

This study confirms that the “three-pillar” construct of food security—availability (AV), access (AC), and utilization (UT)—explains 57% of the variance in stunting prevention behaviour among Bondowoso households and supports the hypothesis that stronger food security predicts lower stunting risk. The hypothesis proposed in this research, which states that food security has a positive influence on stunting prevention, is largely confirmed through findings showing a significant relationship between food security and a reduction in stunting rates.
Overall, this research confirms that food security, which includes the availability of, access to, and utilization of food, is a key factor in supporting stunting prevention. Good access to food and the availability of sufficient food resources are essential to ensuring that children obtain the nutrition they need for optimal growth. Apart from that, the effective use of food also plays a role in supporting preventive health practices which can strengthen efforts to reduce stunting rates.
Policies that focus on increasing food access for families of children under five and providing sufficient nutritious food must be a priority. Nutrition education programs targeting parents of toddlers are also needed to ensure the optimal use of food. In addition, it is important to diversify local food and increase awareness about sanitation and hygiene as part of efforts to prevent stunting. The policy implications are as follows: AV—provide subsidized seed and small-livestock packages and establish village food banks to buffer lean-season shortages. AC—expand conditional cash/food-voucher schemes tied to growth-monitoring visits for families below the poverty line. UT—scale up Posyandu-led cooking demonstrations and hygiene clinics to translate resources into safe, diverse diets. The key performance target is as follows: ≥3 percentage-point annual reduction in stunting prevalence.
Limitations and future research: Self-reported behaviours, the moderate sample size, and the omission of cultural moderators may limit external validity. Future longitudinal and mixed-methods studies should triangulate with 24 h dietary recalls, the direct observation of WASH practices, and qualitative probes into feeding norms to test causal pathways and context-specific barriers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P. and L.Z.; methodology, G.P., A.A., L.Z. and R.R.; software, A.A., R.R., A.E. and S.A.; validation, G.P., L.Z., A.T.N. and E.S.; formal analysis, G.P.; investigation, G.P., A.A. and R.R.; resources, G.P.; data curation, G.P., L.Z., A.E., S.A., A.T.N. and E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.; writing—review and editing, G.P., A.A., R.R. and L.Z.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, G.P., A.E., S.A., A.T.N. and E.S.; project administration, G.P.; funding acquisition, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundamental Research Scheme from Directorate of Research and Community Service (DRPM/Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat), Universitas Brawijaya. Contract Number 00309.56/UN10.A0501/B/PT.01.03.2/2024. And the APC was funded by DRPM, Universitas Brawijaya.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tjenemundan, D.; Guampe, F.A.; Kayupa, O.O.; Labesani, C.; Alfian, M. Pencegahan Stunting Melalui Penguatan Ketahanan Pangan dengan Metode Partisipasi Aktif pada Masyarakat Desa Kumpi Kecamatan Lembo Kabupaten Morowali Utara. PaKMas J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. 2024, 4, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rehena, Z.; Hukubun, M.; Nendissa, A.R. Pengaruh Edukasi Gizi terhadap Pengetahuan Ibu tentang Stunting di Desa Kamal Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Moluccas Health J. 2021, 2, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Munawaroh, H.; Nada, N.K.; Hasjiandito, A.; Faisal, V.I.A.; Heldanita, H.; Anjarsari, I.; Fauziddin, M. Peranan Orang Tua Dalam Pemenuhan Gizi Seimbang Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Stunting Pada Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun. Sentra Cendekia 2022, 3, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sofiatun, F.D. Shaping Healthy Beginnings: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Parenting Styles on Toddler Nutritional Status. Nurs. Health Sci. J. 2024, 4, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kininmonth, A.R.; Herle, M.; Haycraft, E.; Farrow, C.; Tommerup, K.; Croker, H.; Pickard, A.; Edwards, K.R.; Blissett, J.; Llewellyn, C.H. Reciprocal associations between parental feeding practices and child eating behaviours from toddlerhood to early childhood: Bivariate latent change analysis in the Gemini cohort. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Erik, E. Stunting Pada Anak Usia Dini. Etos J. Pengabdi. Masy. 2020, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wardani, L.K.; Aulia, V.; Hadhikul, M.; Kardila, M. Risks of Stunting and Interventions to prevent Stunting. J. Community Engagem. Health 2023, 6, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sri Wahyuni, S.; Sutarno, M. Stunting Prevention Intervention in Pregnant Women in 2023. Int. J. Health Pharm. 2024, 4, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Putra, D.P.; Riantina, A.; Nurindalia, B.; Juniarti; Kirana, T.A.; Mayang, D.I.; Idris, H.; Flora, R.; Misnaniarti; Hasyim, H. The Role of Food Security in the Incident of Stunting in Toddlers. Community Med. Educ. J. 2023, 4, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frisnoiry, S.; Enjelika, T.N.; Siahaan, B.M.G.; Dupa, L.P. Efektivitas Program Ketahanan Pangan dalam Menangani Kasus Stunting di Kabupaten Asahan Tahun 2024. As-Syirkah Islam. Econ. Financ. J. 2024, 3, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Layang, S.; Lailiyah, B.N.; Ishudi, P.C.; Oktavia, R.B.; Wulandari, L.A.; Cahyanti, M.; Wijaya, S.; Kadmaer, K.B.P.; Hasibuan, T.; Agustinus, N.; et al. Food Security for Stunting Prevention with Hydroponic Plant Cultivation in the Tumbang Miri Village. ABDIMAS TALENTA J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. 2023, 8, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pardede, P.D.K.; Saraan, I.I.K. Food Security Office Strategies for Addressing Stunting Issues in Medan City. J. Peasants’ Rights 2023, 2, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shofa, N.Z.; Ahmad, B.B.; Raisa, D.; Hadi Kurniyawan, E.; Tri Afandi, A.; Endrian Kurniawan, D.; Rosyidi Muhammad Nur, K. Food Security on The Incidence of Stunting in Agricultural Areas. Nurs. Health Sci. J. 2024, 4, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sihite, N.W.; Nazarena, Y.; Ariska, F.; Terati, T. Analisis Ketahanan Pangan Dan Karakteristik Rumah Tangga Dengan Kejadian Stunting. J. Kesehat. Manarang 2021, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nabilah, K.; Muhdar, I.N.; Lestari, W.A.; Sariman, S. The Relationship Between Macro-Nutrient Intake, Food Security, and Nutrition-Related Knowledge with the Incidence of Stunting in Toddlers. J. Health Nutr. Res. 2024, 3, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Belayneh, M.; Loha, E.; Lindtjørn, B. Seasonal Variation of Household Food Insecurity and Household Dietary Diversity on Wasting and Stunting among Young Children in A Drought Prone Area in South Ethiopia: A Cohort Study. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2021, 60, 44–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sari, I.P.; Ningsih, W.I.F.; Sari, D.M. The Correlation Between the Household Food Security and the Incidence of Stunting in Toddlers 6-59 Months in Seberang Ulu I Palembang. J. Ilmu Kesehat. Masy. 2023, 14, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yazew, T. Risk Factors of Stunting and Wasting among Children Aged 6–59 Months in Household Food Insecurity of Jima Geneti District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia: An Observational Study. J. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 2022, 3981417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prendergast, A.J.; Humphrey, J.H. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr. Int. Child Health 2014, 34, 250–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Surmita, S.; Sekartini, R.; Kekalih, A.; Hendarto, A.; Prawitasari, T.; Novita Chandra, D.; Andriani, R.; Nur Fauziyah, R. Effect of Complementary Feeding Training on Posyandu Cadres Knowledge as Stunting Prevention On 6–12 Months Children. Int. Conf. Interprofessional Health Collab. Community Empower. 2023, 5, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smith, B.; Kiely, M.; McCarthy, E.K. Influences on the dietary patterns and eating behaviours of 18–36-month-old toddlers in Ireland. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2024, 83, E402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ngure, F.M.; Reid, B.M.; Humphrey, J.H.; Mbuya, M.N.; Pelto, G.; Stoltzfus, R.J. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), environmental enteropathy, nutrition, and early child development: Making the links. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1308, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Santiyah, S.; Razak, R.; Budiastuti, A.; Sunarsih, E.; Ekasari, R. The Relationship between Personal Hygiene, Maternal Health Status, and History of Diarrhea to Stunting Cases in Indonesia: Systematic Review. Media Publ. Promosi Kesehat. Indones. (MPPKI) 2024, 7, 2886–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sari, D.P.; Yusuf, S.; Andid, R.; Darussalam, D.; Dimiati, H.; Amna, E.Y. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) factors associated with stunting among under-fives: A hospital-based cross-sectional study in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. AcTion Aceh Nutr. J. 2024, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Budiastutik, I.; Pranaka, R.N.; Amaliyah, N.; Hediyanti, G.; Trisnawati, E. The Relation of Infectious Diseases, Water Access, Hygiene Practice, and Sanitation with the Stunting: A Case-Control Study in Sambas Regency. Amerta Nutr. 2024, 8, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Santhyami, S.; Yunita, H. Sustainable Food Security: An Ethnobotanical Study of Dlingo Village, Grobogan Regency. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1357, 12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dewi, W.U.; Nisa, K.; Usman, M. Analysis of Food Security Factors in Indonesia using SEM-GSCA with the Alternating Least Squares Method. JTAM (J. Teor. Apl. Mat.) 2024, 8, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reuveni, S. The Role of Food Prices and Market Access in Contributing to Hunger in Low-Income Populations. Eximia 2025, 14, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amalia, S.; Maria, S.; Fitrianitha, D. The Dynamics of Food security in Indonesia: A Study on the Availability, Affordability, and Utilization of Food in Districts and Cities with the Lowest Index in 2022. Int. J. Econ. 2024, 3, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Adinia, S.; Choiriyah, I.U. Strategi Program Ketahanan Pangan Dalam Menanggulangi Stunting Di Desa Ketapang Kecamatan Tanggulangin Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Equilib. J. Ilm. Ekon. Manaj. Akunt. 2024, 13, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chabibah, I.F.A.; Anggraeny, D.; Irot, R.A. Optimizing the Role of Posyandu Cadres in Providing Nutrition Education and Stimulation as Prevention and Handling of Stunting. ABDIMAS J. Pengabdi. Masy. 2023, 6, 4086–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruel, M.T.; Alderman, H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: How can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet 2013, 382, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bhutta, Z.A.; Das, J.K.; Rizvi, A.; Gaffey, M.F.; Walker, N.; Horton, S.; Webb, P.; Lartey, A.; Black, R.E. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet 2013, 382, 452–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pakaya, Y.; Kadir, S.; Kasim, V.N.A. Implementasi Kebijakan Intervensi Gizi Sensitif dalam Penanganan Stunting di Kabupaten Gorontalo. Health Inf. J. Penelit. 2023, 15, e1244. [Google Scholar]
  36. Priyono, P. Strategi Percepatan Penurunan Stunting Perdesaan (Studi Kasus Pendampingan Aksi Cegah Stunting di Desa Banyumundu, Kabupaten Pandeglang). J. Good Gov. 2020, 16, 149–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research Model Development.
Figure 1. Research Model Development.
Societies 15 00135 g001
Figure 2. Measurement model results.
Figure 2. Measurement model results.
Societies 15 00135 g002
Figure 3. Structural model results.
Figure 3. Structural model results.
Societies 15 00135 g003
Figure 4. The influence of food security on stunting prevention behaviour.
Figure 4. The influence of food security on stunting prevention behaviour.
Societies 15 00135 g004
Table 1. Research variables.
Table 1. Research variables.
VariableSub VariableNoteIndicatorNote
Stunting prevention efforts (STGs)Health Prevention PracticesHPPsHealth insurance coverageSTG1
Impact of social guidanceSTG2
Effect of the household environmentSTG3
Interventions to Prevent StuntingIPSsProactive responses to stunting informationSTG4
Consistency in stunting prevention effortsSTG5
Eating Behaviour in ToddlersEBTDecrease in instant food consumptionSTG6
Sufficiency of daily energy intakeSTG7
Provision of exclusive breastfeedingSTG8
Adherence to the immunization scheduleSTG9
Timely introduction of complementary foodsSTG10
Incidence of infectious diseasesSTG11
Sanitation and Hygiene PracticesSHPsWaste management disciplineSTG12
Accessibility of clean waterSTG13
Instilling handwashing habits in childrenSTG14
Food security (FC)Food availabilityAVFulfilment of nutritional food requirementsAV1
Days lacking nutritious foodAV2
Challenges in providing complementary foodsAV3
Storage of food suppliesAV4
Food accessibilityACTime invested in acquiring nutritious foodAC1
Transportation expenses to reach the marketAC2
Interruptions in transport or supply chainsAC3
Food utilizationUTFrequency of health facility visitsUT1
Frequency of serving nutritious mealsUT2
Receiving food assistanceUT3
Table 2. Krejcie and Morgan table [32].
Table 2. Krejcie and Morgan table [32].
NSNSNS
10102201401200291
15142301441300297
20192401481400302
25242501521500306
30282601551600310
35322701591700313
40362801621800317
45402901651900320
50443001692000322
55483201752200327
60523401812400331
65563601862600335
70593801812800338
75634001963000341
80664202013500346
85704402054000351
90734602104500354
95764802145000357
100805002176000361
110865502267000364
120926002348000367
130976502429000368
14010370024810,000370
15010875025415,000375
16011380026020,000377
17011885026530,000379
18012390026940,000380
19012795027450,000381
200132100027875,000382
2101361100285100,000384
Table 3. Sample.
Table 3. Sample.
NoVillageNumber of Stunted ChildrenSample
1Lombok Kulon3328
2Tumpeng1311
3Jempong109
4Tangsil Wetan2925
5Lorok1614
6Bendo1412
7Pasarejo1715
Sample113
Table 4. Measurement model.
Table 4. Measurement model.
VariablesIndicatorsNoteLoadingCRAVE
Health Prevention Practices (HPPs)Health insurance coverageSTG10.9570.9560.878
Impact of social guidanceSTG20.919
Effect of the household environmentSTG30.935
Interventions to Prevent Stunting (IPSs)Proactive responses to stunting informationSTG40.9560.9610.924
Consistency in stunting prevention effortsSTG50.967
Eating Behaviour in Toddlers (EBT)Decrease in instant food consumptionSTG60.8600.9470.751
Sufficiency of daily energy intakeSTG70.712
Provision of exclusive breastfeedingSTG80.943
Adherence to the immunization scheduleSTG90.901
Timely introduction of complementary foodsSTG100.949
Incidence of infectious diseasesSTG110.811
Sanitation and Hygiene Practices (SHPs)Waste management disciplineSTG120.8380.8820.714
Accessibility of clean waterSTG130.774
Instilling handwashing habits in childrenSTG140.917
Food availability (AV)Fulfilment of nutritional food requirementsAV10.8890.9530.835
Days lacking nutritious foodAV20.882
Challenges in providing complementary foodsAV30.954
Storage of food suppliesAV40.928
Food accessibility (AC)Time invested in acquiring nutritious foodAC10.9570.9540.873
Transportation expenses to reach the marketAC20.961
Interruptions in transport or supply chainsAC30.883
Food utilization (UT)Frequency of health facility visitsUT10.8380.9250.804
Frequency of serving nutritious mealsUT20.897
Receiving food assistanceUT30.952
Table 5. Discriminant validity.
Table 5. Discriminant validity.
Construct1234567
AC0.934
OF0.4310.914
EBT0.5890.7980.867
HPPs0.5760.8570.8470.937
IPSs0.3390.7850.7710.7110.961
SHPs0.4070.7870.7990.8030.6960.845
OUT0.6210.8040.7580.8180.6030.7020.897
Table 6. Path coefficient testing: relationships between constructs.
Table 6. Path coefficient testing: relationships between constructs.
Path CoefficientsOriginal SampleStandard DeviationT Statisticsp ValuesDecision
AC → EBT0.2580.0485.3970.000Supported
AC → HPPs0.1780.0434.1730.000Supported
AC → IPSs0.0380.0550.7000.484Not supported
AC → SHPs0.0240.0860.2730.785Not supported
OFF → EBT0.5840.0866.8090.000Supported
OFF → HPPs0.5970.0718.3580.000Supported
OFF → IPSs0.8560.0889.7460.000Supported
OFF → SHPs0.6330.1036.1740.000Supported
OUT → EBT0.1270.1081.1830.238Not supported
OUT → HPPs0.2280.0802.8620.004Supported
OUT → IPSs−0.1090.1081.0050.315Not supported
UT → SHPs0.1780.1121.5980.111Not supported
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prayitno, G.; Auliah, A.; Zuhriyah, L.; Efendi, A.; Arifin, S.; Rahmawati, R.; Nugraha, A.T.; Siankwilimba, E. Exploring the Role of Food Security in Stunting Prevention Efforts in the Bondowoso Community, Indonesia. Societies 2025, 15, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050135

AMA Style

Prayitno G, Auliah A, Zuhriyah L, Efendi A, Arifin S, Rahmawati R, Nugraha AT, Siankwilimba E. Exploring the Role of Food Security in Stunting Prevention Efforts in the Bondowoso Community, Indonesia. Societies. 2025; 15(5):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prayitno, Gunawan, Aidha Auliah, Lilik Zuhriyah, Achmad Efendi, Syamsul Arifin, Rahmawati Rahmawati, Achmad Tjachja Nugraha, and Enock Siankwilimba. 2025. "Exploring the Role of Food Security in Stunting Prevention Efforts in the Bondowoso Community, Indonesia" Societies 15, no. 5: 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050135

APA Style

Prayitno, G., Auliah, A., Zuhriyah, L., Efendi, A., Arifin, S., Rahmawati, R., Nugraha, A. T., & Siankwilimba, E. (2025). Exploring the Role of Food Security in Stunting Prevention Efforts in the Bondowoso Community, Indonesia. Societies, 15(5), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop