Next Article in Journal
Flowing between the Personal and Collective: Being Human beyond Categories of Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Recognition and Justice? Conceptualizing Support for Women Whose Children Are in Care or Adopted
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 as a Global Risk: Confronting the Ambivalences of a Socionatural Threat
Previous Article in Special Issue
“I Had No Hope, I Had No Help at All”: Insights from a First Study of Fathers and Recurrent Care Proceedings
Open AccessArticle

Parental Non-Engagement within Child Protection Services—How Can Understandings of Complex Trauma and Epistemic Trust Help?

1
Centre for Child and Family Justice Research, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YD, UK
2
School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester CO43SQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2020, 10(4), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040093
Received: 14 October 2020 / Revised: 13 November 2020 / Accepted: 16 November 2020 / Published: 26 November 2020
Building on the findings from the national study of mothers in recurrent care proceedings in England, this paper proposes that the concepts of complex trauma and epistemic trust may help explain parents’ difficulties in engaging with child protection services. With the aim of advancing theoretical knowledge, qualitative data drawn from interviews with 72 women who have experienced repeat care proceedings are revisited, with a focus on women’s developmental histories and accounts of engagement with professionals, to probe the issue of service engagement. The article starts with a succinct review of the literature on parental non-engagement in child protection, highlighting strengths and potential limitations of current knowledge. This is followed by an introduction to the theoretical concepts of complex trauma and epistemic trust, outlining how these concepts provide an alternative framing of the reasons why parents may resist, or are reluctant to engage with, professionals. Drawing on women’s first-person accounts, we argue that high levels of maltreatment and adversity in women’s own childhoods shape adult relationships, particularly in relation to vulnerability to harm in adult lives but also mistrust of professional help. Extracts from women’s first-person accounts, chosen for their typicality against the core themes derived from the data, indicate that acts of resistance or rejection of professional help can be seen as adaptive—given women’s childhoods and relationship histories. The authors conclude that parents’ social histories need to be afforded far closer attention in child protection practice, if preventative services are to reach those with histories of developmental trauma. View Full-Text
Keywords: complex trauma; child protection; parental non-engagement; recurrent care proceedings; epistemic trust complex trauma; child protection; parental non-engagement; recurrent care proceedings; epistemic trust
MDPI and ACS Style

Mason, C.; Taggart, D.; Broadhurst, K. Parental Non-Engagement within Child Protection Services—How Can Understandings of Complex Trauma and Epistemic Trust Help? Societies 2020, 10, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040093

AMA Style

Mason C, Taggart D, Broadhurst K. Parental Non-Engagement within Child Protection Services—How Can Understandings of Complex Trauma and Epistemic Trust Help? Societies. 2020; 10(4):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mason, Claire; Taggart, Danny; Broadhurst, Karen. 2020. "Parental Non-Engagement within Child Protection Services—How Can Understandings of Complex Trauma and Epistemic Trust Help?" Societies 10, no. 4: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040093

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop