Next Article in Journal
Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Basketball Referee Decision-Making Using the DMQ-II Questionnaire
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Daily Mile Program During Recess on Physical Fitness in Adolescents: A Comparative Pilot Study of Weekly Frequency and Gender Differences Among Students in a Region of Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Marked Differences in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength and Motor Performance Between Japanese and Chinese Children Aged 9–12: A Cross-National Study

by
Kun Niu
* and
Kaoru Tsuyama
Graduate School of Health and Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 7-1-1 Fukasawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8508, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2025, 13(8), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080271
Submission received: 3 July 2025 / Revised: 10 August 2025 / Accepted: 14 August 2025 / Published: 15 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Motor Behavior and Child Health)

Abstract

Background: This study includes an investigation of lower-limb muscle strength and physical activity among children in Japan and China, with the aim of promoting children’s health. Methods: A total of 564 children (300 boys, 264 girls) aged 9–12 years from public primary schools in Tokyo, Japan, and Jiangxi Province, China, were included. Height, body weight (BW), hip adductor and abductor strength, and toe grip strength were measured. The side-step test (SST) and timed-up-and-go test (TUGT) were performed. Exercise habits were assessed via a questionnaire. Results: Japanese students produced significantly higher values than Chinese students in SST (23.3–37.1%) and TUGT (6.6–8.0%), except among 11-year-old girls. Japanese boys aged 10–11 and girls aged 10–12 had significantly greater hip adductor strength/BW and toe grip strength/BW. Japanese students also showed significantly higher hip abductor strength/BW at all ages. Additionally, the proportion of children engaging in vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) was significantly higher in Japanese boys aged 10–12 and girls aged 9–11 than in their Chinese counterparts. Conclusions: Chinese students showed diminished lower-limb strength and agility compared to Japanese students. These findings highlight the importance of promoting outdoor play, particularly VPA, to improve children’s physical fitness and health, especially in China.

1. Introduction

Physical inactivity among children is a serious global issue, including in Japan and China. This problem has garnered increasing global attention and is evoking significant concerns about child health [1,2,3].
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the following physical activity guidelines for children and adolescents: (1) engagement in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), primarily aerobic, for at least 60 min daily; and (2) participation in vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA), as well as muscle- and bone-strengthening activities, at least three days per week [4]. However, despite the existence of these guidelines, many children globally fail to achieve the recommended physical activity levels proposed by the WHO [1,2]. Guthold et al. [1] (2020) reported that approximately 80% of school-aged children worldwide do not engage in sufficient physical activity, with this prevalence increasing to 85% among Asian populations. Insufficient physical activity among children is associated with declines in physical fitness, increased rates of childhood obesity, worse eyesight, and mental health issues [5,6].
While physical inactivity is a problem in both Japan and China, it stems from different factors in each country. In China, rapid economic growth in recent years has been linked to various child health issues, including obesity, physical inactivity, and declining eyesight [7]. Due to safety concerns, many Chinese parents rely on private vehicles for transportation, which further reduces children’s physical activity levels [8]. Approximately 170 million children and adolescents in China were classified as insufficiently physically active [9]. To address this issue, the Chinese government has implemented the Healthy China 2030 initiative, which aims to ensure all children engage in at least 60 min of daily physical activity [10]. In Japan, physical fitness assessments among children have been conducted via the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology’s physical fitness tests since 1964. Although children’s physical fitness peaked around 1985, it has gradually declined thereafter and remains low to this day [11]. In addition, “Falls” were the most common cause of injuries among children aged 6–12 years, accounting for 43.49% of injuries [12]. Additionally, 30.1% of these children sustained injuries to the face or head during falls, highlighting a lack of proficiency in adopting effective and protective postures when falling among many children [13]. Lower-limb muscle strength and agility are crucial in child development and the prevention of injuries.
Physical activity habits formed in childhood often continue into adulthood [14] and have been shown to influence the maintenance of long-term health [15]. In particular, lower-limb muscle strength is essential for performing basic daily movements such as walking, sitting, standing from a chair, and stair climbing. Insufficient lower-limb muscle strength impairs stability during these activities, increasing the risk of falls and injuries [16]. Specifically, hip adductor strength (HADS), hip abductor strength (HABS), and toe grip strength (TGS) have critical roles in balance control [17,18]. Moreover, TGS was reported to influence running and jumping performance [19]. Therefore, adequate development of lower-limb muscle strength is a critical factor for maintaining children’s overall health.
Although Japan and China are geographically and culturally close, they differ significantly in social environments as well as in the policies and content of physical education [2,20]. However, no study has examined the physical fitness and exercise habits of Japanese and Chinese children from the perspective of lower-limb muscle strength. A cross-national comparison can elucidate the influence of sociocultural contexts on children’s physical development and offer important academic and practical insights.
The purpose of this study was to investigate lower-limb muscle strength and physical activity among children aged 9–12 years in Japan and China, with the goals of identifying cross-national differences and promoting children’s health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants in this study were 564 children aged 9–12 years enrolled in public primary schools in Japan (Tokyo) and China (Jiangxi Province). The distribution of participants by country, age, and sex was as follows: Japan (9-year-old children: 14 boys, 12 girls; 10-year-old children: 40 boys, 45 girls; 11-year-old children: 41 boys, 34 girls; 12-year-old children: 34 boys, 29 girls) and China (9-year-old children: 34 boys, 36 girls; 10-year-old children: 53 boys, 49 girls; 11-year-old children: 67 boys, 48 girls; 12-year-old children: 17 boys, 11 girls). Table 1 shows participants’ height, body weight (BW), and body mass index (BMI).
The consent procedure involved first thoroughly explaining the purpose and content of the study to the principals and classroom teachers at the target schools and obtaining approval from the principals to conduct the study. Subsequently, written explanations regarding the purpose and content of the study were provided to the participating children and their parents or guardians, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nippon Sport Science University (approval numbers: 023-H089 and 023-H153).

2.2. Measurements

The measured items included height, BW, HADS, HABS, TGS, the side-step test (SST), and the timed-up-and-go test (TUGT).
HADS and HABS were measured simultaneously on both the right and left sides using a hip adduction/abduction dynamometer (T.K.K.3367b, Takei Ltd., Niigata, Japan). Participants were seated with hip and knee joints flexed at 90°. For the HADS measurement, participants applied adduction force by pressing medially against a dynamometer placed between their knees (Figure 1). For the HABS measurement, a strap was wrapped around the middle of the thighs, and participants applied abduction force by pushing laterally against its resistance (Figure 1) [21].
TGS was assessed using a toe grip strength-measuring instrument (T.K.K.3361, Takei Ltd., Niigata, Japan). Participants were seated with their knees and ankles flexed to 90°, and hands resting on their thighs. The measurement was performed using the dominant foot (the foot typically used to kick a ball). The position of the heel was adjusted using a lever, and the first metatarsophalangeal joint was aligned with the measurement bar (Figure 2) [22].
The SST was performed using two parallel lines drawn at intervals of 100 cm from a central line, following established procedures [23]. Participants stood on the central line and, upon a start signal, stepped laterally to touch or cross the line to their right, returned to the center line, and then stepped laterally to touch or cross the line to their left. This movement was repeated as rapidly as possible for 20 s. One time was counted for each line they passed. Jumping was prohibited.
The TUGT was conducted as follows [24]. The participant sat in an adjustable-height chair, with their hips and knees flexed to 90° and feet flat on the floor. “Ready, go” was the signal to initiate movement. On the “go” cue, the participant stood up, walked 3 m, turned around a mark on the floor, walked back, and sat down. The time in seconds was recorded from the “go” cue to when the participant sat down in the chair. Running was prohibited, and the test was repeated if the participant violated this rule.
All tests were performed twice with maximal effort, and the mean of the two values was used for statistical analysis. Participants wore appropriate clothing for physical activity during the measurements. The findings of previous studies reported a positive correlation between BW and lower-limb muscle strength, including knee extensor strength and TGS [19]. Based on our own research (unpublished data), we also confirmed significant positive correlations between BW and both HADS (r = 0.613, p < 0.001, n = 41) and HABS (r = 0.596, p < 0.001, n = 41) in 6th-grade elementary school students. Therefore, to minimize the influence of BW on muscular strength, all strength values were normalized by BW.
Participants’ physical activity levels were assessed using the internationally recognized Health Behaviour in School-aged Children questionnaire recommended by the WHO [25]. Specifically, the questionnaire assessed the following: (1) how many days during the past week participants engaged in at least 60 min of physical activity that increased their heart rate and breathing frequency (MVPA, METs ≥ 3.0) [25] and (2) how many hours per week participants usually spent exercising during their free time, causing them to get out of breath or sweat (VPA, METs > 6.0) [26].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Non-parametric data are presented as median (range). Normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test for sample sizes below 50 and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for sample sizes of 50 or greater.
For comparisons of muscle strength and motor performance, an independent t-test was conducted for variables with a normal distribution, whereas the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to those without a normal distribution. The Chi-Square test compared the proportions of children engaging in MVPA and VPA. For MVPA, the proportion of children who engaged in at least 60 min of MVPA daily was compared between the Japanese and Chinese students. For VPA, participants were categorized into two groups based on weekly duration: those who were engaged ≥ 2 h per week and those who were engaged < 2 h. The use of the 2 h threshold was exploratory, as the WHO recommends engaging in vigorous physical activity at least three days per week but does not provide a specific duration.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for macOS, Version 29.0.2.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical significance was set at 5%.

3. Results

The HADS/BW and TGS/BW of the Japanese students were significantly higher than those of the Chinese students among boys aged 10–11 years and girls aged 10–12 years. Furthermore, the HABS/BW of the Japanese students was significantly higher than that of the Chinese students across all age groups in both sexes (Table 2). Although all measurement procedures were standardized, the chairs used during the lower-limb strength tests were not height-adjustable, which may have slightly affected the test posture of some participants.
Significant differences in SST and TUGT were observed between Japanese and Chinese students across all age groups and both sexes, except for the 11-year-old girls. In the results derived from the Japanese students compared to those from the Chinese students, the SST and TUGT values were 23.3–37.1% and 6.6–8.0% higher, respectively (Table 3).
No significant differences were observed in the proportion of Japanese and Chinese students engaging in MVPA. However, the proportion of children engaging in ≥2 h of VPA per week among Japanese students was significantly higher than that of Chinese students, particularly among boys aged 10–12 years and girls aged 9–11 years. Importantly, among girls aged 9–10 years, the proportion of students engaging in ≥2 h of VPA per week among the Japanese students was more than four times that of the Chinese students (Table 4).

4. Discussion

This study includes a comparison of lower-limb muscle strength, motor performance, and participation in physical activity between Japanese and Chinese primary school children. Chinese children demonstrated significantly lower values for muscle strength (HADS/BW, HABS/BW, and TGS/BW), motor performance (SST and TUGT), and a lower proportion of children engaging in ≥2 h of VPA per week.
Yang et al. [27] (2019) compared VO2max between Japanese and Chinese children aged 7–18 years (n = 9025) and reported that the cardiorespiratory fitness of Chinese children was significantly lower than that of Japanese children and that physical activity among Chinese children was insufficient. Li et al. [28] (2020) reported that Chinese children’s agility, assessed by SST, and aerobic fitness, assessed by a 20 m shuttle run, were significantly lower than those of Japanese children. Consistent with their findings, the present study also revealed that Chinese children showed significantly lower SST.
In a longitudinal study [29] conducted in Nagano, SST values among children in grades 4–6 (approximately 10–12 years old) ranged from 39.9 ± 5.9 to 47.6 ± 7.4 repetitions. Similarly, a study [23] from Hokkaido reported that SST values ranged from 39.8 ± 4.9 to 41.4 ± 8.1 repetitions among fifth-grade students. These values are comparable to those observed in the present study on Japanese children aged 9–12 years in Tokyo (SST values ranged from 33.3 ± 4.7 to 43.6 ± 5.7 repetitions). In contrast, Chinese children in the same age group demonstrated markedly lower SST performance, with values from 27.0 ± 3.3 to 31.8 ± 4.9 repetitions. SST is an important assessment of agility [30], and is closely related to neurological development in children, significantly improving during early to middle childhood [31]. The age of 9–12 years is often termed the “golden age” and represents a critical period for neurological development [32]. However, Chinese children showed significantly lower SST values, as well as lower values of lower-limb muscle strength (HADS/BW and HABS/BW). These findings suggest that Chinese children are not sufficiently engaged in physical activities that promote agility during early to middle childhood.
Compared with China, the Japanese government emphasizes developing fundamental motor abilities, such as balance, agility, and coordination, particularly in early primary education [20]. In contrast, the Chinese government understates curricula designed to enhance fundamental motor skills [20]. This curricular focus in Chinese school physical education may negatively impact neurological development, including agility.
In this study, the TGS/BW of Chinese children was significantly lower than that of Japanese children in some grades. TGS has been positively correlated with physical performance indicators such as the 50 m sprint (running ability), standing long jump (jumping ability), and the functional reach test (balance ability) [18,19]. Tsuyama [19] reported TGS/BW values among third-grade elementary school students (approximately 9 years old) in Japan, with boys showing 0.37 ± 0.08 kg/kg and girls 0.38 ± 0.10 kg/kg. The present study found higher TGS/BW values for 9-year-old Japanese children than those reported by Tsuyama and extremely low values for Chinese children.
These findings suggest that Chinese children’s engagement in daily activities involving running and jumping is lower than that of Japanese children. This interpretation is further supported by the results of the TUGT, which is related to balance, coordination, and cognitive function [33,34]. In the present study, Chinese children showed a tendency to expend significantly more time in the TUGT than Japanese children.
Marchese et al. [35] reported that the median (range) TUGT values for children aged 10–12 years in the United States ranged from 3.48 (2.68–4.52) to 4.40 (3.27–5.29) seconds. In the present study, Japanese children aged 9–12 years recorded TUGT values from 4.30 ± 0.42 to 4.53 ± 0.48 s, whereas Chinese children in the same age group showed slightly slower performance, with values from 4.62 ± 0.37 to 4.86 ± 0.34 s.
Comparisons of physical activity habits between the two countries revealed no significant differences in participation in MVPA. However, the proportion of Chinese children engaging in at least 2 h of VPA per week was 58.3–81.0% lower than that of Japanese children.
These findings suggest that differences in lower-limb muscle strength (HADS/BW, HABS/BW, and TGS/BW) and motor performance (SST and TUGT) between Japanese and Chinese children may be attributable to a lower proportion of Chinese children engaging in at least 2 h of VPA per week.
In China, most children spend a lot of time studying outside of school, which limits their opportunities for physical activity after school. In contrast, Japanese primary school students reportedly have more free time after school, which helps to enable greater participation in sports and outdoor play [2,36]. Moreover, participation in after-school sports clubs differs markedly between the two countries. Approximately 60–66% of Japanese children participate in such activities; however, Chinese children show a much lower proportion of participation, at less than 20% [2].
Reis et al. [37] reported that weekly participation in approximately 2 h of physical activity sessions primarily focused on VPA among children aged 6–11 years was associated with improvements in agility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and lower-limb muscle strength. They also reported that increasing physical education classes is insufficient and additional opportunities for physical activity outside of school are necessary, such as outdoor play and participation in sports clubs, to promote VPA. Benavente-Marín et al. [38] reported that participation in more than 3 h per week of sports activities outside school significantly enhances children’s VPA levels. Therefore, increasing opportunities for physical activity outside of school may enhance children’s participation in VPA and support improvements in their physical fitness.
It has been reported that physical activity habits established during childhood tend to track into later life, with regular physical activity from early childhood through school age positively influencing health outcomes not only during childhood but also into adulthood [14]. Therefore, it is essential that children actively participate in outdoor physical activities involving running and jumping, both within and outside school settings. This is especially important in China, but also relevant in Japan. Enhancing lower-limb muscle strength and agility through these activities is essential to promoting and maintaining children’s long-term health.
The primary focus of this study was lower-limb muscle strength and motor performance, without accounting for other possible influencing factors such as nutrition and socioeconomic background. In addition, its cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences. Future studies should take a longitudinal approach and incorporate a broader range of variables to deepen the understanding of children’s physical development.

5. Conclusions

Compared with Japanese children, Chinese children showed significantly lower performance in HABS and SST, which reflect agility, and the proportion of children engaging in VPA was also markedly lower in China. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to conduct a cross-national comparison of lower-limb muscle strength, agility-related motor performance, and physical activity levels between Japanese and Chinese primary school children. These findings suggest the importance of actively incorporating VPA, particularly through outdoor play, into children’s daily lives. Although these findings are particularly relevant to Chinese students, they also apply to Japanese students.
As this was a cross-sectional study, causal relationships cannot be determined, and unmeasured factors such as maturation and socioeconomic background may have influenced the results. Future longitudinal studies should address these variables. In addition, we recommend that physical education teachers and related professionals increase opportunities for VPA and agility training, both in school and extracurricular settings. These findings also offer practical guidance for national-level policies aimed at improving children’s long-term physical health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.N. and K.T.; data curation, K.N.; formal analysis, K.N.; funding acquisition, K.N. and K.T.; investigation, K.N.; methodology, K.N. and K.T.; project administration, K.N. and K.T.; resources, K.N. and K.T.; supervision, K.T.; validation, K.N.; visualization, K.N. and K.T.; writing—original draft, K.N.; writing—review and editing, K.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nippon Sport Science University (approval numbers: 023-H089 and 023-H153; approval date: 20 November 2023) and is consistent with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request due to privacy and ethical reasons.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Japanese and Chinese children and their guardians who participated in this study. We also extend our deep appreciation to all those involved in supporting the data collection process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Global Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of 298 Population-Based Surveys with 1.6 million Participants. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aubert, S.; Barnes, J.D.; Demchenko, I.; Hawthorne, M.; Abdeta, C.; Abi Nader, P.A.; Adsuar, J.C.; Aguilar-Farias, N.; Aznar, S.; Bakalár, P.; et al. Global Matrix 4.0 Physical Activity Report Card Grades for Children and Adolescents: Results and Analyses From 57 Countries. J. Phys. Act. Health 2022, 19, 700–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abe, T.; Kitayuguchi, J.; Okada, S.; Okuyama, K.; Gomi, T.; Kamada, M.; Ueta, K.; Nabika, T.; Tanaka, C. Prevalence and Correlates of Physical Activity Among Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study of a Rural City in Japan. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128 (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  5. Pan, C.W.; Ramamurthy, D.; Saw, S.M. Worldwide Prevalence and Risk Factors for Myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2012, 32, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biddle, S.J.H.; Asare, M. Physical Activity and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: A Review of Reviews. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, B.; Zou, Z.; Song, Y.; Hu, P.; Luo, D.; Wen, B.; Gao, D.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Ma, Y.; et al. Adolescent Health and Healthy China 2030: A Review. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 67, S24–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. China National Children’s Center. Child-Friendly School Route Design. 2022. Available online: https://www.ccc.org.cn/art/2022/8/23/art_507_42208.html (accessed on 8 August 2025). (In Chinese).
  9. Chen, P.; Wang, D.; Shen, H.; Yu, L.; Gao, Q.; Mao, L.; Jiang, F.; Luo, Y.; Xie, M.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Physical Activity and Health in Chinese Children and Adolescents: Expert Consensus Statement. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Healthy China 2030 Planning Outline. 2016. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm (accessed on 8 August 2025). (In Chinese)
  11. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Results of the 2022 National Survey on Physical Fitness and Athletic Ability; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology: Tokyo, Japan, 2022; Available online: https://www.mext.go.jp/sports/b_menu/toukei/chousa04/tairyoku/kekka/k_detail/1421920.htm (accessed on 8 August 2025). (In Japanese)
  12. Tokyo Fire Department. Emergency Transport Data on Daily Life Accidents (Reiwa 5); Tokyo Fire Department: Tokyo, Japan, 2023; Available online: https://www.tfd.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/learning/elib/kkhdata/index.html (accessed on 8 August 2025). (In Japanese)
  13. Japan Sport Council. Disasters Under the Management of Schools (Reiwa 6); Japan Sport Council: Tokyo, Japan, 2024; Available online: https://www.jpnsport.go.jp/anzen/Tabid/3053/Default.aspx (accessed on 8 August 2025). (In Japanese)
  14. Telama, R. Tracking of Physical Activity from Childhood to Adulthood: A Review. Obes. Facts 2009, 2, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. García-Hermoso, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Ramírez-Vélez, R. Tracking of Physical Fitness Levels from Childhood and Adolescence to Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transl. Pediatr. 2022, 11, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moreland, J.D.; Richardson, J.A.; Goldsmith, C.H.; Clase, C.M. Muscle Weakness and Falls in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2004, 52, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lanza, M.B.; Arbuco, B.; Ryan, A.S.; Shipper, A.G.; Gray, V.L.; Addison, O. Systematic Review of the Importance of Hip Muscle Strength, Activation, and Structure in Balance and Mobility Tasks. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 103, 1651–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, Y.W.; Kwon, O.Y.; Cynn, H.S.; Weon, J.H.; Yi, C.H.; Kim, T.H. Comparison of Toe Plantar Flexors Strength and Balancing Ability between Elderly Fallers and Non-Fallers. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2011, 23, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsuyama, K. Relationship between lower extremity muscle strength and running or jumping ability in prepubertal elementary school children from the perspective of sex difference. Jpn. Assoc. Hum. Auxol. 2023, 29, 24–29. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, S.L.; Huang, H.J. Inspirations to China from the Setup of Sports Skill Curriculum Contents in Japan’s Study Guidelines of Physical Education Discipline in Compulsory Education. J. Phys. Educ. 2020, 27, 103–109. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoshiko, A.; Beppu, M.; Izumida, R.; Matsubara, M.; Otani, T.; Shiratsuchi, H.; Takahira, N.; Moritani, T.; Watanabe, K. Long-Term Assessment of Morphological, Functional, and Quantitative Parameters of Skeletal Muscle in Older Patients after Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty. Exp. Gerontol. 2020, 137, 110971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaoru, T.; Nakajima, H. Comparison of Leg Muscle Strength and Balancing Ability in Different Age Groups: Females from 60 to 84 Years Old Who Practiced at a Health Promotion Gymnastics Club. Jpn. J. Clin. Sports Med. 2023, 31, 298–304. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morita, N.; Yamauchi, J.; Kurihara, T.; Fukuoka, R.; Otsuka, M.; Okuda, T.; Ishizawa, N.; Nakajima, T.; Nakamichi, R.; Matsuno, S.; et al. Toe Flexor Strength and Foot Arch Height in Children. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Katz-Leurer, M.; Rotem, H.; Keren, O.; Meyer, S. Balance Abilities and Gait Characteristics in Post-Traumatic Brain Injury, Cerebral Palsy and Typically Developed Children. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2009, 12, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Currie, C.; Inchley, J.; Molcho, M.; Lenzi, M.; Veselska, Z.; Wild, F. The Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study Protocol: Background, Methodology and Mandatory Items for the 2013/14 Survey; Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit (CAHRU): St Andrews, UK, 2014; Available online: https://hbsc.org/publications/survey-protocols/ (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  26. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd ed.; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. Available online: https://odphp.health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  27. Yang, X.; Yin, X.; Ji, L.; Song, G.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, G.; Bi, C.; Sun, Y.; Li, M.; et al. Differences in Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Chinese and Japanese Children and Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Q.; Yin, X.; Bi, C.; Yang, X.; Sun, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, T.; Liu, Y.; et al. Levels of Physical Fitness and Weight Status in Children and Adolescents: A Comparison between China and Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kidokoro, T.; Edamoto, K. Improvements in Physical Fitness are Associated with Favorable Changes in Blood Lipid Concentrations in Children. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2021, 20, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yasumitsu, T.; Nogawa, H. Effects of a Short-Term Coordination Exercise Program during School Recess: Agility of Seven- to Eight-Year-Old Elementary School Children. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2013, 116, 598–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tarnichkova, M.; Petrova, M. Dynamics of development and evaluation of agility in school education (1st–12th grade). J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2020, 4, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miller, E.M. The First Seriatum Study of Growth by R. E. Scammon. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2018, 165, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Beerse, M.; Lelko, M.; Wu, J. Biomechanical Analysis of the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test in Children with and without Down syndrome. Gait Posture 2019, 68, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mirelman, A.; Weiss, A.; Buchman, A.S.; Bennett, D.A.; Giladi, N.; Hausdorff, J.M. Association between performance on Timed Up and Go subtasks and mild cognitive impairment: Further insights into the links between cognitive and motor function. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marchese, V.G.; Oriel, K.N.; Fry, J.A.; Kovacs, J.L.; Weaver, R.L.; Reilly, M.M.; Ginsberg, J.P. Development of reference values for the functional mobility assessment. Pediatr. Phys. Ther. 2012, 24, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakamura, R.; Yamashita, J.; Akabayashi, H.; Tamura, T.; Zhou, Y. A Comparative Analysis of Children’s Time Use and Educational Achievement: Assessing Evidence from China, Japan and the United States. Chin. J. Sociol. 2020, 6, 257–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reis, L.N.; Reuter, C.P.; Burns, R.D.; Martins, C.M.D.L.; Mota, J.; Gaya, A.C.A.; Silveira, J.F.D.C.; Gaya, A.R. Effects of a Physical Education Intervention on Children’s Physical Activity and Fitness: The PROFIT Pilot Study. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Benavente-Marín, J.C.; Barón-López, F.J.; Barcenilla, B.G.; Abril, G.L.; Aguirre, J.M.R.; Pérez-Farinós, N.; Wärnberg, J. Adherence to the WHO Recommendation of Three Weekly Days of Vigorous Intensity Activities in Children: An Accelerometry Study of Vigorous Physical Activity Bouts. PeerJ 2024, 12, e16815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Measurement methods of hip adduction strength (a) and hip abduction strength (b). Note: (a) The red arrow with vertical lines indicates the direction of the applied inward force; (b) “α” (blue arrow with diagonal lines) indicates the strap used to secure the participant’s leg. The red arrow with vertical lines indicates the direction of the applied outward force.
Figure 1. Measurement methods of hip adduction strength (a) and hip abduction strength (b). Note: (a) The red arrow with vertical lines indicates the direction of the applied inward force; (b) “α” (blue arrow with diagonal lines) indicates the strap used to secure the participant’s leg. The red arrow with vertical lines indicates the direction of the applied outward force.
Sports 13 00271 g001
Figure 2. Measurement methods of toe grip strength. Note: “α” indicates the measurement bar, “β” indicates the adjustment lever, and “γ” indicates the fixation strap.
Figure 2. Measurement methods of toe grip strength. Note: “α” indicates the measurement bar, “β” indicates the adjustment lever, and “γ” indicates the fixation strap.
Sports 13 00271 g002
Table 1. Physical characteristics of the participants.
Table 1. Physical characteristics of the participants.
VariableAge (Years)BoyspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)GirlspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)
nC, nJChinaJapannC, nJChinaJapan
Height (cm)934, 14136.5 ± 7.6134.7 (132.4–141.5)1.000 0.00036, 12135.5 ± 6.2136.5 ± 7.30.643 0.155
1053, 40141.1 ± 6.3139.7 ± 7.00.312 −0.21349, 45144.2 ± 7.0139.9 ± 7.20.004 −0.611
1167, 41147.5 ± 7.8145.4 ± 6.20.154 −0.28448, 34150.3 ± 7.3147.2 ± 5.60.041 −0.465
1217, 34151.8 ± 6.0154.9 ± 7.40.143 0.44211, 29153.4 ± 7.1153.5 ± 4.80.936 0.028
Body Weight (kg)934, 1433.1 (27.7–42.7)31.7 (28.4–34.3)0.856 −0.02636, 1227.3 (25.9–30.7)31.1 ± 6.00.225 0.175
1053, 4033.2 (30.1–38.1)34.4 (29.4–38.8)0.923 −0.00149, 4535.6 (31.4–39.3)32.8 (27.6–39.8)0.193 −0.134
1167, 4138.4 (34.6–45.6)36.8 (34.2–41.4)0.268 −0.10748, 3438.4 (34.0–45.7)38.1 ± 6.00.273 −0.121
1217, 3440.6 (38.8–43.7)45.2 (40.8–53.7)0.055 0.26911, 2942.9 ± 6.242.3 ± 5.80.842 0.071
BMI (kg/m2)934, 1417.6 (15.9–21.3)17.1 (16.2–18.1)0.634 −0.06936, 1215.3 (14.4–16.1)16.5 ± 1.60.036 0.302
1053, 4016.8 (16.0–18.0)17.2 (15.9–19.0)0.475 0.07449, 4517.0 (15.2–18.4)16.6 (14.9–20.0)0.835 −0.021
1167, 4117.4 (16.4–20.6)17.4 (16.3–19.3)0.660 −0.04248, 3416.9 (16.0–19.7)17.5 ± 2.10.932 0.009
1217, 3418.4 ± 2.319.2 (17.5–21.0)0.134 0.21011, 2917.8 ± 2.517.9 ± 2.20.903 0.044
Note: Data are presented as means ± standard deviations or medians (ranges); nC = number of participants in China, nJ = number of participants in Japan; = analyzed using independent t-test; = analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test; BMI = body mass index. bold: significant p values.
Table 2. Comparison of lower-limb muscle strength relative to body weight between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
Table 2. Comparison of lower-limb muscle strength relative to body weight between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
VariableAge (Years)BoyspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)GirlspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)
nC, nJChinaJapannC, nJChinaJapan
HADS/BW (kg/kg)934, 140.34 ± 0.100.37 ± 0.140.382 0.28036, 120.33 ± 0.090.37 ± 0.070.175 0.459
1053, 400.37 ± 0.090.41 ± 0.100.025 0.47749, 450.33 ± 0.080.39 ± 0.10<0.001 0.719
1167, 410.36 ± 0.100.43 ± 0.100.003 0.60448, 340.34 (0.31–0.41)0.46 (0.39–0.50)<0.001 0.543
1217, 340.40 ± 0.120.43 (0.39–0.49)0.197 0.18011, 290.34 ± 0.060.43 ± 0.090.002 1.174
HABS/BW (kg/kg)934, 140.23 (0.17–0.31)0.46 (0.40–0.62)<0.001 0.69736, 120.22 ± 0.070.53 ± 0.12<0.001 3.754
1053, 400.28 ± 0.080.56 ± 0.12<0.001 2.77849, 450.22 (0.18–0.31)0.56 ± 0.16<0.001 0.781
1167, 410.23 (0.19–0.29)0.59 ± 0.14<0.001 0.80848, 340.23 (0.16–0.28)0.59 ± 0.12<0.001 0.829
1217, 340.26 ± 0.090.55 ± 0.12<0.001 2.67511, 290.21 ± 0.070.54 ± 0.11<0.001 3.338
TGS/BW (kg/kg)934, 140.34 (0.28–0.42)0.42 ± 0.120.057 0.27536, 120.35 ± 0.080.40 ± 0.110.105 0.551
1053, 400.35 ± 0.120.40 ± 0.100.043 0.42949, 450.33 ± 0.100.38 ± 0.110.017 0.501
1167, 410.32 ± 0.110.40 ± 0.10<0.001 0.72348, 340.33 ± 0.090.43 (0.38–0.51)<0.001 0.548
1217, 340.38 ± 0.120.41 ± 0.100.251 0.34511, 290.37 ± 0.080.44 (0.39–0.51)0.020 0.366
Note: Data are presented as means ± standard deviations or medians (ranges); nC = number of participants in China, nJ = number of participants in Japan; = analyzed using independent t-test; = analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test; HADS/BW = hip adduction strength relative to body weight; HABS/BW = hip abduction strength relative to body weight; TGS/BW = toe grip strength relative to body weight. bold: significant p values.
Table 3. Comparison of motor performance between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
Table 3. Comparison of motor performance between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
VariableAge (Years)BoyspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)GirlspEffect Size (Cohen’s d/r)
nC, nJChinaJapannC, nJChinaJapan
SST (repetitions)934, 1428.5 ± 3.438.3 ± 7.2<0.001 2.05136, 1227.0 ± 3.333.3 ± 4.7<0.001 1.717
1053, 4029.6 ± 4.738.5 ± 5.4<0.001 1.75949, 4528.0 (26.0–30.5)36.2 ± 5.4<0.001 0.680
1167, 4130.8 ± 4.641.6 ± 6.3<0.001 2.04448, 3429.8 ± 4.139.9 ± 4.6<0.001 2.343
1217, 3431.8 ± 4.943.6 ± 5.7<0.001 2.19411, 2931.2 ± 4.040.3 ± 6.5<0.001 1.524
TUGT (s)934, 144.66 ± 0.414.30 ± 0.420.007 −0.88936, 124.82 ± 0.464.50 ± 0.430.039 −0.710
1053, 404.73 (4.42–4.85)4.38 ± 0.450.002 −0.32649, 454.79 ± 0.404.42 (4.10–4.77)0.001 −0.337
1167, 414.67 (4.36–4.97)4.34 (4.11–4.66)0.001 −0.31448, 344.70 ± 0.504.53 ± 0.480.138 −0.336
1217, 344.62 ± 0.374.30 (4.07–4.66)0.046 −0.28011, 294.86 ± 0.344.47 ± 0.460.01 4−0.911
Note: Data are presented as means ± standard deviations or medians (ranges); nC = number of participants in China, nJ = number of participants in Japan; = analyzed using independent t-test; = analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test; SST = side-step test; TUGT = timed-up-and-go test. bold: significant p values.
Table 4. Comparison of physical activity levels between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
Table 4. Comparison of physical activity levels between Japanese and Chinese participants by age in boys and girls.
VariableAge (Years)BoyspEffect Size (OR, 95% CI)GirlspEffect Size (OR, 95% CI)
nC, nJChinaJapannC, nJChinaJapan
MVPA934, 1410 (29.4)4 (28.6)0.9540.988 (0.665–1.468)36, 123 (8.3)3 (25.0)0.1311.222 (0.869–1.719)
1053, 4016 (30.2)7 (17.5)0.1600.846 (0.674–1.062)49, 4511 (22.4)8 (17.8)0.5730.943 (0.770–1.155)
1167, 4115 (22.4)10 (24.4)0.8111.026 (0.827–1.274)48, 346 (12.5)3 (8.8)0.6000.960 (0.826–1.114)
1217, 343 (17.6)6 (17.6)1.0001.000 (0.764–1.309)11, 292 (18.2)2 (6.9)0.2880.879 (0.654–1.181)
VPA934, 147 (20.6)6 (42.9)0.1151.390 (0.856–2.257)36, 124 (11.1)7 (58.3)<0.0012.133 (1.081–4.208)
1053, 4014 (26.4)29 (72.5)<0.0012.676 (1.578–4.539)49, 455 (10.2)21 (46.7)<0.0011.684 (1.261–2.248)
1167, 4115 (22.4)22 (53.7)<0.0011.675 (1.176–2.385)48, 348 (16.7)14 (41.2)0.0141.417 (1.041–1.928)
1217, 343 (17.6)16 (47.1)0.0411.556 (1.058–2.288)11, 293 (27.3)13 (44.8)0.3121.318 (0.809–2.148)
Note: Data are expressed as n (%); nC = number of participants in China, nJ = number of participants in Japan; MVPA = proportion of children who engaged in ≥60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity daily; VPA = proportion of children who engaged in ≥2 h of vigorous-intensity physical activity per week. bold: significant p values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, K.; Tsuyama, K. Marked Differences in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength and Motor Performance Between Japanese and Chinese Children Aged 9–12: A Cross-National Study. Sports 2025, 13, 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080271

AMA Style

Niu K, Tsuyama K. Marked Differences in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength and Motor Performance Between Japanese and Chinese Children Aged 9–12: A Cross-National Study. Sports. 2025; 13(8):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Kun, and Kaoru Tsuyama. 2025. "Marked Differences in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength and Motor Performance Between Japanese and Chinese Children Aged 9–12: A Cross-National Study" Sports 13, no. 8: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080271

APA Style

Niu, K., & Tsuyama, K. (2025). Marked Differences in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength and Motor Performance Between Japanese and Chinese Children Aged 9–12: A Cross-National Study. Sports, 13(8), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop