Predicting Phloeosinus cupressi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phloeosinus) Distribution for Management Planning Under Climate Change
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Model Framework and Software
2.1.1. CLIMEX Model
2.1.2. Random Forest (RF) Model
2.2. Data Collection
2.2.1. Historical and Future Climate Data
CLIMEX
Random Forest (RF)
2.2.2. Known Distributions of P. cupressi and Cupressus
2.2.3. Parameter Fitting
Temperature Index
Moisture Index
Cold Stress
Heat Stress
Dry Stress
Wet Stress
2.3. Global Potential Distribution of P. cupressi in Relation to Host Cupressus
3. Results
3.1. Potential Global Distribution of the Host Cupressus Using CLIMEX
3.2. Global Potential Distribution of P. cupressi Using Random Forest (RF)
3.3. Global Potential Distribution of P. cupressi Overlapping That of the Host Cupressus
3.3.1. South America
3.3.2. Asia
3.3.3. Oceania
3.3.4. North America
3.3.5. Europe
3.3.6. Africa
4. Discussion
4.1. Projected Global and Regional Shifts in Climatic Suitability for P. cupressi Under Future Climate Scenarios
4.2. Shift in Key Climatic Drivers of P. cupressi Distribution
4.3. Limitations of the Model and Future Management Strategies for P. cupressi
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brockerhoff, E.G.; Knížek, M.; Bain, J. Checklist of indigenous and adventive bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) of New Zealand and interceptions of exotic species (1952–2000). N. Z. Entomol. 2003, 26, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bright, D.E. The Bark Beetles of Canada and Alaska: Coleoptera: Scolytidae; Agriculture Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins, A.D. Original description of Phloeosinus cupressi. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 1903, 5, 35. [Google Scholar]
- Zondag, R. Phloeosinus cupressi, the Cypress Bark Beetle. In Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand No. 3; Forest Research Institute: Wellington, New Zealand, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Román-Jordán, E.; Esteban, L.G.; de Palacios, P.; Fernández, F.G. Wood anatomy of Cupressus and its relation to geographical distribution. IAWA J. 2016, 37, 48–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govaerts, R.; Farjon, A. World Checklist of Cupressaceae; Royal Botanic Gardens: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Dallimore, W.; Jackson, A.B.; Harrison, S.G. A Handbook of Coniferae and Ginkgoaceae; St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, C.B.; Wagener, W.E. The New World Cypresses; Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden: Anaheim, CA, USA, 1948. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, L.H. The Cultivated Evergreens: A Handbook of the Coniferous and Most Important Broad-Leaved Evergreens Planted for Ornament in the United States and Canada; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1923. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, W.; Xiang, Y.; Gao, M.; Deng, R.; Sun, Y.; Wan, R.; Pan, X.; Li, W.; Zhong, Y. Phenotypic diversity and provenance variation of Cupressus funebris: A case study in the Sichuan Basin, China. Peerj 2024, 12, e18494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergsten, U.; Sundberg, M. IDS-sedimentation of Cupressus lusitanica seeds. In Tropical Tree Seed Research; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR): Canberra, Australia, 1990; pp. 99–102. [Google Scholar]
- Von Carlowitz, P.G. Multipurpose Tree and Shrub Seed Directory; International Council for Research in Agroforestry: Nairobi, Kenya, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Bolotin, M. Segregation in progenies of Cupressus sempervirens L. La-Yaaran 1964, 14, 46–48. [Google Scholar]
- Bannister, M. Prospects for selection in the cypresses. N. Z. J. For. 1962, 8, 545–559. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Wang, X.; Lin, L.; Hu, X. Morphological Features, Harmfulness of an Alien Quarantine Pest Phloeosinus cupressi. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2013, 52, 1320–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near-term Information. In Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 553–672. [Google Scholar]
- Bowler, D.E.; Hof, C.; Haase, P.; Kröncke, I.; Schweiger, O.; Adrian, R.; Baert, L.; Bauer, H.-G.; Blick, T.; Brooker, R.W. Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramalho, Q.; Vale, M.M.; Manes, S.; Diniz, P.; Malecha, A.; Prevedello, J.A. Evidence of stronger range shift response to ongoing climate change by ectotherms and high-latitude species. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 279, 109911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, I.; Hill, J.K.; Ohlemüller, R.; Roy, D.B.; Thomas, C.D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 2011, 333, 1024–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rubenstein, M.A.; Weiskopf, S.R.; Bertrand, R.; Carter, S.L.; Comte, L.; Eaton, M.J.; Johnson, C.G.; Lenoir, J.; Lynch, A.J.; Miller, B.W. Climate change and the global redistribution of biodiversity: Substantial variation in empirical support for expected range shifts. Environ. Evid. 2023, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffy, K.; Gouhier, T.C.; Ganguly, A.R. Climate-mediated shifts in temperature fluctuations promote extinction risk. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moir, M.L.; Hughes, L.; Vesk, P.A.; Leng, M.C. Which host-dependent insects are most prone to coextinction under changed climates? Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 1295–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elith, J.; Leathwick, J.R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40, 677–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearney, M.R.; Wintle, B.A.; Porter, W.P. Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dormann, C.F.; Schymanski, S.J.; Cabral, J.; Chuine, I.; Graham, C.; Hartig, F.; Kearney, M.; Morin, X.; Römermann, C.; Schröder, B.; et al. Correlation and process in species distribution models: Bridging a dichotomy. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 2119–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Early, R.; Rwomushana, I.; Chipabika, G.; Day, R. Comparing, evaluating and combining statistical species distribution models and CLIMEX to forecast the distributions of emerging crop pests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, W.H. Spatial prediction of Melanoplus differentialis using an ensemble of multiple species distribution models. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2026, 19, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabani, F.; Kumar, L.; Ahmadi, M. A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 5973–5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayat, U.; Shi, J.; Wu, Z.; Rizwan, M.; Haider, M.S. Which SDM Model, CLIMEX vs. MaxEnt, Best Forecasts Aeolesthes sarta Distribution at a Global Scale under Climate Change Scenarios? Insects 2024, 15, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriticos, D.J.; Maywald, G.F.; Yonow, T.; Zurcher, E.J.; Herrmann, N.I.; Sutherst, R. CLIMEX Version 4: Exploring the Effects of Climate on Plants, Animals and Diseases. CSIRO 2015, 4, 184. [Google Scholar]
- Sutherst, R.W.; Maywald, G. A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1985, 13, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; Version 4.5.2; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Thuiller, W.; Georges, D.; Gueguen, M.; Engler, R.; Breiner, F.; Lafourcade, B.; Patin, R.; Blancheteau, H. biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/biomod2/index.html (accessed on 31 January 2025).
- Chen, X.; Xiao, K.; Deng, R.; Wu, L.; Cui, L.; Ning, H.; Ai, X.; Chen, H. Projecting the future redistribution of Pinus koraiensis (Pinaceae: Pinoideae: Pinus) in China using machine learning. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2024, 7, 1326319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudík, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.; Hijmans, R.J.; Huettmann, F.; Leathwick, J.R.; Lehmann, A. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiades, P.; Proestos, Y.; Lelieveld, J.; Erguler, K. Machine learning modeling of Aedes albopictus habitat suitability in the 21st century. Insects 2023, 14, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Wan, Y.; Lin, W.; Ernstsons, A.S.; Gao, L. Estimating potential distribution of sweetgum pest Acanthotomicus suncei and potential economic losses in nursery stock and Urban Areas in China. Insects 2021, 12, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, C.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z. An improved convolutional neural network based indoor localization by using Jenks natural breaks algorithm. China Commun. 2022, 19, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, K.; Deng, R.; Chen, X.; Yu, C.; Wu, L.; Ning, H.; Chen, H. Projection of the Climate-Suitable Area of the Invasive Pest Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Phoracantha) and Its Ability to Continue to Expand in China. Insects 2025, 16, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fielding, A.H.; Bell, J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 1997, 24, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McHugh, M.L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 2012, 22, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.; Ge, X.; Wang, T.; Wen, J.; Zong, S. Areas of potential suitability and survival of Dendroctonus valens in china under extreme climate warming scenario. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2015, 105, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Record, S.; Charney, N.; Zakaria, R.; Ellison, A.M. Projecting global mangrove species and community distributions under climate change. Ecosphere 2013, 4, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falloon, P.; Dankers, R.; Betts, R.; Jones, C.; Booth, B.; Lambert, F. Role of vegetation change in future climate under the A1B scenario and a climate stabilisation scenario, using the HadCM3C Earth system model. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 4739–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Jiang, Z.; Li, L. Probabilistic projections of climate change over China under the SRES A1B scenario using 28 AOGCMs. J. Clim. 2011, 24, 4741–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakicenovic, N.; Alcamo, J.; Davis, G.; Vries, B.; Fenhann, J.; Gaffin, S.; Gregory, K.; Grubler, A.; Jung, T.Y.; Kram, T. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I.P.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. The impact of climate change on agricultural insect pests. Insects 2021, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GBIF Occurrence Download. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.kyu2xe (accessed on 5 January 2025). [CrossRef]
- GBIF Occurrence Download. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.k8dj3j (accessed on 7 January 2025). [CrossRef]
- Lyu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Hou, G.; Chen, G.; Zhao, K.; Fan, C.; Li, X. Forest gaps alter the soil bacterial community of weeping cypress plantations by modulating the understory plant diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 920905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; He, W.; Ren, J.; Wen, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, G.; Feng, M.; Fan, C. Shrub diversity and niche characteristics in the initial stage of reconstruction of low-efficiency cupressus funebris stands. Forests 2021, 12, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, J.L. SDM toolbox: A python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.; He, S.; Zhu, C.; Wang, T.; Xu, Z.; Zong, S. Projecting the current and future potential global distribution of Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) using CLIMEX. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghodskhah Daryaei, M.; Ahoo Ghalandari, N.; Torkaman, J. Investigation the effect of climate variables on growth patterns of the cypress (Cupressus sempervirens Var. Horizontalis) trees in Noshahr and Rudbar habitats. J. Plant Res. 2021, 34, 717–729. [Google Scholar]
- Frezza, C.; De Vita, D.; Sciubba, F.; Toniolo, C.; Tomassini, L.; Nicoletti, M.; Franceschin, M.; Guiso, M.; Bianco, A.; Serafini, M. There is not only Cupressus sempervirens L.: A review on the phytochemistry and bioactivities of the other Cupressus L. species. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tadros, M.J.; Alqudah, A.M.; Arabiat, Y.S. Comparative study between Cupressus sempervirens and Cupressus arizonica in seed germination and seedling vigour. Crop Res. 2010, 40, 174–181. [Google Scholar]
- Raddi, P.; Panconesi, A. Genetic variability of tolerance to cold in Cupressus sempervirens progenies. Silvae Genet 1989, 38, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
- Larcher, W. Ökophysiologie der Pflanzen: Leben, Leistung und Streßbewältigung der Pflanzen in ihrer Umwelt; UTB: Stuttgart, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, S.; Lee, W.-H. Assessing potential European areas of Pierce’s disease mediated by insect vectors by using spatial ensemble model. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1209694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, J.; Yin, J.; Dong, L.; Gao, Y.; Shi, S.; Zou, J.; Li, W.; Wang, Y. Impact of Temperature and Soil Moisture on the Life Cycle of the Strawberry Pest Priophorus fulvostigmatus and Its Control. Insects 2025, 16, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosace, M.; Björklund, N.; Boberg, J.; Bradshaw, C.; Camac, J.; Damus, M.; Kompas, T.; Li, C.; MacLeod, A.; Maggini, R. Including climate change in pest risk assessment: Current practices and perspectives for future implementation. EPPO Bull. 2024, 54, 52–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subedi, B.; Poudel, A.; Aryal, S. The impact of climate change on insect pest biology and ecology: Implications for pest management strategies, crop production, and food security. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, J.A.; Heinen, R.; Gols, R.; Thakur, M.P. Climate change-mediated temperature extremes and insects: From outbreaks to breakdowns. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 6685–6701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Feng, C.; Wan, P.; Chang, K. Potential distributional changes of invasive crop pest species associated with global climate change. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 82, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, I.S.; Jones, T.H.; Hartley, S.E. The role of resources and natural enemies in determining the distribution of an insect herbivore population. Ecol. Entomol. 2001, 26, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, T.; Ejtehadi, H.; Djamali, M.; Guibal, F. The world’s easternmost natural stands of Cupressus sempervirens L.(Cupressaceae) in the Hyrcanian Forest of Iran. J. Mediterr. Ecol. 2020, 18, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
- Guisan, A.; Petitpierre, B.; Broennimann, O.; Daehler, C.; Kueffer, C. Unifying niche shift studies: Insights from biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chown, S.L.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Kristensen, T.N.; Angilletta, M.J., Jr.; Stenseth, N.C.; Pertoldi, C. Adapting to climate change: A perspective from evolutionary physiology. Clim. Res. 2010, 43, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jönsson, A.M.; Harding, S.; Krokene, P.; Lange, H.; Lindelöw, Å.; Økland, B.; Ravn, H.P.; Schroeder, L.M. Modelling the potential impact of global warming on Ips typographus voltinism and reproductive diapause. Clim. Chang. 2011, 109, 695–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiala, T.; Holuša, J. Occurrence of the invasive bark beetle Phloeosinus aubei on common juniper trees in the Czech Republic. Forests 2018, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| CLIMEX Parameter | Final Parameter Value |
|---|---|
| Temperature requirements | |
| Lower temperature threshold (°C) (DV0) | −15 |
| Lower optimum temperature (°C) (DV1) | 13.6 |
| Upper optimum temperature (°C) (DV2) | 20.4 |
| Upper temperature threshold (°C) (DV3) | 45 |
| Soil moisture | |
| Lower soil moisture threshold (SM0) | 0.05 |
| Lower optimal soil moisture (SM1) | 0.5 |
| Upper optimal soil moisture (SM2) | 0.9 |
| Upper soil moisture threshold (SM3) | 1.5 |
| Cold stress | |
| Cold stress temperature threshold (°C) (TTCS) | −15 |
| Cold stress temperature rate (week−1) | −0.125 |
| Heat stress (THCS) | |
| Heat stress temperature threshold (°C) (TTHS) | 45 |
| Heat stress temperature rate (week−1) (THHS) | 0.015 |
| Dry stress | |
| Dry stress threshold (SMDS) | 0.05 |
| Dry stress rate (week−1) (HDS) | −0.005 |
| Wet stress | |
| Wet stress threshold (SMWS) | 1.5 |
| Wet stress rate (week−1) (HWS) | 0.012 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cao, Y.; Xiao, K.; Ling, L.; Wu, Q.; Huang, B.; Deng, X.; Cao, Y.; Ning, H.; Chen, H. Predicting Phloeosinus cupressi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phloeosinus) Distribution for Management Planning Under Climate Change. Insects 2026, 17, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010077
Cao Y, Xiao K, Ling L, Wu Q, Huang B, Deng X, Cao Y, Ning H, Chen H. Predicting Phloeosinus cupressi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phloeosinus) Distribution for Management Planning Under Climate Change. Insects. 2026; 17(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010077
Chicago/Turabian StyleCao, Yu, Kaitong Xiao, Lei Ling, Qiang Wu, Beibei Huang, Xiaosu Deng, Yingxuan Cao, Hang Ning, and Hui Chen. 2026. "Predicting Phloeosinus cupressi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phloeosinus) Distribution for Management Planning Under Climate Change" Insects 17, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010077
APA StyleCao, Y., Xiao, K., Ling, L., Wu, Q., Huang, B., Deng, X., Cao, Y., Ning, H., & Chen, H. (2026). Predicting Phloeosinus cupressi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phloeosinus) Distribution for Management Planning Under Climate Change. Insects, 17(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010077

