Next Article in Journal
An Overview of the Adverse Impacts of Old Combs on Honeybee Colonies and Recommended Beekeeping Management Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Additive Insecticidal Effects of Chitosan/dsRNA Nanoparticles Targeting V-ATPaseD and Emamectin Benzoate–Lufenuron Formulations Against Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Abundance of the Dominant Endosymbiont Rickettsia and Fitness of the Stored-Product Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae)

1
Henan Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Storage Security, School of Food and Strategic Reserves, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
Industry & Technology Innovation Center of Green-Intelligence Control of Stored Products Pests, School of Food and Strategic Reserves, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3
Postharvest Technology on Field Crops Research and Development Group, Postharvest, Processing Research and Development Division, Department of Agriculture, 50 Phaholyothin Road, Ladyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(4), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040349
Submission received: 15 January 2025 / Revised: 26 February 2025 / Accepted: 11 March 2025 / Published: 27 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Simple Summary

Liposcelis bostrychophila, a dominant species of psocids, has become a major pest of stored grain, posing serious threats to grain storage security and safety. Endosymbionts play a significant regulatory role in the population dynamics of their host organisms. This study demonstrated that Rickettsia was the predominant genus of symbiotic microorganisms, present in the Liposcelis bostrychophila analyzed through metagenomic methods. The abundance of Rickettsia, influenced by environmental temperature, positively impacted the fitness of L. bostrychophila. Managing the abundance of the endosymbiont Richettsia can help control the stored-grain pest L. bostrychophila.

Abstract

Endosymbiotic bacteria are key factors that regulate the biological traits of Liposcelis bostrychophila. This study employed metagenomic methods to analyze the dominant species of symbiotic microorganisms associated with L. bostrychophila. By controlling the environmental temperature, we were able to manipulate the abundance of endosymbionts and establish populations with high, medium, and low levels of these bacteria. This allowed us to examine the fitness parameters of L. bostrychophila under different levels of endosymbiont abundance. The experimental results revealed that L. bostrychophila hosts 51 genera of symbiotic microorganisms, with Rickettsia being the dominant genus, accounting for 84.11% to 98.16% of the total share. Environmental temperature significantly affected the abundance of Rickettsia, with notable differences observed during the adult stage of L. bostrychophila. A temperature gradient of 28 °C, 35 °C, and 37 °C was established, allowing for the classification of populations based on Rickettsia abundance into three categories: high-abundance populations (LBhp), medium-abundance populations (LBmp), and low-abundance populations (LBlp). The abundance of Rickettsia had a significant impact on the fitness of L. bostrychophila. Specifically, a high abundance of Rickettsia contributed positively to population fitness by increasing egg production, prolonging egg hatching time, enhancing lifespan, and improving both survival and reproductive rates. Therefore, the endosymbiont Rickettsia plays a crucial role in the growth and development of L. bostrychophila. In the future, our research will help further uncover the interactions between Rickettsia and its host, providing new perspectives for pest control and offering a better understanding of insect biology and ecology.

1. Introduction

Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae) is a widely distributed pest that infests stored products, including food (wheat, rice, coffee, etc.), medicinal herbs (such as Corchorus capsularis), books, archives, and biological specimens [1,2,3]. L. bostrychophila can result in a weight loss of 9.7% in broken wheat kernels over three months [4]. Annual losses caused by booklice in commercial rice storage in India (40,000 tons) and Indonesia (150,000 tons) were estimated at GBP 115,000 (USD 180,000) and GBP 50,000 (USD 75,000), respectively [5]. This tiny insect often hides in its habitat, such as grain piles, wall corners, or behind books, and is frequently overlooked; however, heavy infestations can lead to significant economic losses [6]. Additionally, L. bostrychophila can carry pathogenic microorganisms and contains allergenic proteins, which may trigger allergic reactions in some individuals [7]. The Rickettsia felis strain within L. bostrychophila can cause fever and experimental pneumonia in mammals [8]. Additionally, allergenic proteins in booklice are also considered potential factors in triggering allergic reactions. Studies have indicated that the Lip b1 protein in booklice may be a novel allergenic protein, potentially leading to respiratory allergies in humans [9]. Due to its ability to reproduce parthenogenetically, strong mobility, and high adaptability, its population can quickly resurge if control measures are inadequate, making effective pest management a significant challenge [10]. The recovery of booklice populations after chemical pesticide treatment is much faster than that of beetle pest populations [11]. These limitations highlight the need for more innovative and sustainable control methods. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence the population growth of L. bostrychophila is essential for successful control efforts.
Insect population growth is influenced by various factors, with endosymbionts playing a significant regulatory role in population dynamics [12]. Endosymbionts are microorganisms that reside within the host’s cells [13], and this symbiotic relationship has existed for approximately 200 to 250 million years [14]. Insect endosymbionts are classified into two categories: obligate endosymbionts and facultative endosymbionts [15,16]. Obligate endosymbionts typically inhabit the host’s reproductive cells or specialized bacteriocytes and are essential for the host’s survival and reproduction, as they are closely linked to the host’s acquisition of vital nutrients [17]. In contrast, facultative endosymbionts are not confined to specific cells [18], and their effects on the host are more varied. These effects can include influencing growth and development [19,20,21], reproduction [22,23], insecticide resistance [24], and heat tolerance [25], etc.
Different types of symbiotic microbes have varying effects on their hosts, such as how these microbes contribute to the host’s nutrition, immunity, and stress tolerance, but also offers new insights into the ecological functions and adaptability of hosts within ecosystems. These symbionts can influence various ecological processes, from nutrient cycling to the resilience of hosts under environmental stress, highlighting their crucial role in the stability and functioning of ecosystems. Earlier research primarily relied on morphological observations, isolation and cultivation techniques, and PCR methods [26,27]. However, The PCR method primarily relies on known sequences, which may not comprehensively capture all species in the host microbiome, especially those that are under-researched or unculturable. Additionally, the quantitative capability of PCR is limited, making it difficult to accurately reflect the richness and diversity of microbial communities. Therefore, with advancements in endosymbiont detection technologies, metagenomic methods have emerged as a unique approach to study the composition and biological functions of insect-associated microbiota [28,29]. For example, the research on the microbial community diversity in the parasitic wasp Megaphragma amalphitanum has shown that small body sizes and limited lifespans do not significantly reduce bacterial symbiont diversity [30]. In another study, the bacterial species and their functions in the striped mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) were explored, resulting in the successful identification of several bacterial taxa [31]. Additionally, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, researchers studied the microbial community in the invasive species Asian ladybird, Harmonia axyridis, revealing the distribution of dominant bacterial phyla [32]. Similarly, a comparative analysis of the microbiomes of Diaphorina citri, Tamarixia radiata, and Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis, indicates that Candidatus Profftella armature and Wolbachia emerge as the dominant endosymbionts [33].
However, studies on the endosymbionts of L. bostrychophila have primarily relied on morphological observations or PCR methods that focus on a single species of symbiont bacterium. Yusuf et al. [34] was the first to use electron microscopy to observe a large number of endosymbionts in the reproductive system of L. bostrychophila, noting that these endosymbionts were distributed within oocytes. Based on their morphological characteristics, he identified the symbiont as being similar to Wolbachia, a finding that was later confirmed through 16S rDNA amplification. Additionally, treatment with 1% rifampicin resulted in the elimination of this symbiont, leading to a significant decrease in egg-laying by L. bostrychophila [35]. Mikac [36] employed Wolbachia-specific primers for PCR amplification and successfully detected the presence of Wolbachia. Wang [37] studied three geographical populations of L. bostrychophila using 16S rRNA universal primers, identifying a symbiotic bacterial fragment of approximately 1500 bp. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that this bacterium is closely related to Rickettsia in the class Alpha-proteobacteria and is also genetically similar to W. pipientis, although its exact species could not be determined. Wang et al. [38] used Cardinium-specific primers for PCR amplification and confirmed the presence of Cardinium in L. bostrychophila. Following four weeks of treatment with 1% rifampicin, Cardinium was completely eliminated, resulting in a significant reduction in the insect’s fitness. Meanwhile, Perotti et al. [39] utilized both specific and universal primers for PCR amplification; however, only Rickettsia was amplified, with no detection of Wolbachia or Cardinium. After subjecting the samples to heat treatment at 37 °C to eliminate Rickettsia, egg-laying in L. bostrychophila decreased by approximately 90%. Behar et al. [40] used specific primers for 16S rRNA, gltA, ompA, ompB, and the cell surface antigen sca4 to conduct amplification and sequencing, confirming that the endosymbiont in L. bostrychophila is R. felis. To date, research on the endosymbionts of L. bostrychophila has primarily focused on these three types of symbionts.
However, the overall diversity of its endosymbionts, the dominant symbiont species, and their relationship with host fitness remain largely unexamined. Therefore, we detected the diversity of symbiotic bacteria in L. bostrychophila through metagenomic sequencing and identified the dominant endosymbiotic bacteria species in it. By treating the insects at different temperatures, we established experimental systems of L. bostrychophila with different abundances of dominant endosymbiotic bacteria. Using the life table method, we counted the developmental duration, survival rate, fecundity, etc., of each life stage of L. bostrychophila under different abundances of dominant endosymbiotic bacteria. In-depth study of the abundance of dominant endosymbiotic bacteria and their impact on the fitness of L. bostrychophila will provide key clues for understanding the ecological adaptation mechanism of this pest. This will not only help to reveal the role of endosymbiotic bacteria in insect population dynamics, but may also provide potential biological control methods for future pest management strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect

Liposcelis bostrychophila specimens were collected from a grain reserve warehouse in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. They were subsequently purified and cultured for several generations in the Stored-Product Pest Control Laboratory at Henan University of Technology (HAUT). Approximately 500 adult L. bostrychophila were placed in clean, disposable plastic rearing dishes (diameter = 4.5 cm, height = 2.5 cm), with about 25 individuals per dish, using a total of 20 rearing dishes. Appropriate feed, consisting of wheat flour, skim milk powder, and yeast powder in a mass ratio of 10:1:1, was added. The insects were cultured in the dark at a temperature of (28 ± 1) °C and (75 ± 2.5) % relative humidity (RH). After three days, all adults were removed, and three-day-old eggs were collected. The eggs continued to be cultured under the same conditions for 30 days; after hatching, nymphs were cleaned from any attached feed and impurities using a crawler tower. The feed consisted of a mixture of whole wheat flour (screened through a 100-mesh sieve), yeast powder, and skimmed milk powder in a 10:1:1 ratio. The crawler tower was constructed using two clean glass culture dishes: the lower dish (diameter = 9 cm, height = 2 cm) served as a lid, with the opening facing upward, while the upper dish (diameter = 3.5 cm, height = 1.5 cm) was inverted and placed on top of the lower dish. The experimental insects were placed in the upper part of the crawler tower, allowing them to move freely. Those individuals collected from the lower part were carefully removed under a microscope using a fine brush to obtain clean experimental insects.

2.2. Metagenomic Sequencing

Clean L. bostrychophila adults were placed into sterilized centrifuge tubes, with approximately 5000 individuals per tube, filling each tube up to 1.5 mL. Under sterile conditions, the insects were washed three times with deionized distilled water (ddH2O) and 75% ethanol to ensure surface sterilization. The samples were labeled as HBSJ1. Similarly, additional samples, labeled as HBSJ2 and HBSJ3, were prepared. All samples were stored at −80 °C. They were then sent to Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for metagenomic sequencing. The specific steps are as follows:

2.2.1. DNA Extraction

Total community genomic DNA extraction was performed using a E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA Kit (Omega, M5635-02, Norcross, GA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. We measured the concentration of the DNA using a Qubit 4.0 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) to ensure that adequate amounts of high-quality genomic DNA had been extracted.

2.2.2. Library Preparation for Sequencing

The total amount of DNA in each sample was 500 ng, as input material for DNA sample preparation. Sequencing libraries were generated using Hieff NGS® MaxUp ||DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (12200ES96, YEASEN, Shanghai, China) following manufacturer’s instructions, and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. In a nutshell, DNA was broken into fragments of about 500 bp using Covaris 220. In order to purify DNA fragments of 500 bp, the library fragments were purified with Hieff NGS™ DNA Selection Beads (12601ES56, YEASEN, China). The purification is considered successful when the total amount of the purified product reaches 40% of the initial input. The purified DNA was end-repaired and Adapter-Ligated, and underwent fragment selection. Then, PCR was performed with 2 × Super Canace®II High-Fidelity Mix, Primer Mix(p5/p7) and Adaptor-Ligated DNA. At last, PCR products were purified (Hieff NGS™ DNA Selection Beads) and library quality was assessed on the Qubit®4.0 Flurometer. The libraries were then quantified and pooled. Paired-end sequencing of the library was performed on the NovaSeq 6000 sequencers (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.2.3. Data Assessment and Quality Control

Fastp (version 0.36) was used for evaluating the quality of sequenced data. Raw reads were filtered according to several steps: (1) removing adaptor sequence; (2) removing low quality bases from reads 3′ to 5′ (Q < 20), using a sliding window method to remove base values less than 20 in tail reads (window size is 4 bp); (3) finding the overlap of each pair of reads and properly correcting inconsistent bases within the interval; (4) removing reads with read lengths of less than 35nt and their pairing reads. And the remaining clean data were used for further analysis.

2.2.4. Metagenome Assembly and Binning

First, use Megahit (version 1.2.9) to perform multi-sample mixed splicing to obtain preliminary spliced contig sequences. Then, use bowite2 (version 2.1.0) to map clean reads were back to the spliced results, extract unmapped reads, and splice them again using SPAdes (version 3.13) to obtain low-abundance contigs. The parameters for Bowtie2 are as follows: D 20 -R 3 -N 1 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50. MetaWRAP (version 1.3.2) was used to perform a binning series, and processes such as Bin sorting, Bin purification, Bin quantification, Bin reassembly, and Bin identification were performed in sequence. After filtering, a draft genome of a single bacteria with high integrity and low contamination was obtained.

2.2.5. Gene Prediction and Non-Redundant Gene Set Construction

Prodigal (version 2.60) was used to predict the ORF of the splicing results, select genes with a length greater than or equal to 100 bp, and translate them into amino acid sequences. For the gene prediction results of each sample, the CD-HIT (version 2.60) was used for de-redundancy, to obtain a non-redundant gene set. Salmon (version 1.5.0) was used to construct a specific index of non-redundant gene sets, using a dualphase algorithm and a method of constructing a bias model to accurately quantify the abundance of genes in each sample, and calculate gene abundance based on gene length information.

2.2.6. Species Annotations

DIAMOND (version 0.8.20) was used to compare the gene set with NR to obtain species annotation information. Screening conditions: E-value < 1 × 10−5, Score > 60. Based on gene set abundance information and annotation information, species abundances were obtained.

2.3. Construction of Diverse Rickettsia Abundance System

Two thousand L. bostrychophil adults were placed in several rearing boxes and provided with appropriate feed. The insects were cultured in the dark at a temperature of (28 ± 1) °C and (75 ± 2.5) % RH. After 24 h, the adults were removed, and 1-day-old eggs (E0) were collected. The E0 were divided into three groups: a0, a1, and a2. Each group was placed into separate rearing boxes under the following conditions: the a0 group was cultured at (28 ± 1) °C, the a1 group at (35 ± 1) °C, and the a2 group at (37 ± 1) °C. All groups were maintained at (75 ± 2.5) % RH in dark conditions. This setup aimed to establish high, medium, and low abundance populations of Rickettsia in L. bostrychophila, referred to as LBhp, LBmp, and LBlp, respectively. Samples were collected at various developmental stages: 1-day-old eggs, first nymphs, second nymphs, third nymphs, fourth nymphs, and adults. For instance, at the first nymph stage of LBhp, 50 nymphs of similar size were randomly selected as a sample using the crawler tower method. Three samples were collected in total. The insects were washed three times with ddH2O and 75% ethanol. DNA was then extracted and subjected to quantitative PCR analysis. Details of the quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis method and specific information about the primers are provided in the supplementary materials. The abundance of Rickettsia was assessed using a standard curve. The same method was applied to the other developmental stages to evaluate the abundance differences of in LBhp, LBmp and LBlp Rickettsia.

2.4. Fitness of L. bostrychophila at Varying Levels of Rickettsia Abundance

Five hundred adults of L. bostrychophila were placed in insect rearing boxes, and an appropriate amount of feed was added. After incubating for 24 h at (28 ± 1) °C and (75 ± 2.5) % RH, in dark conditions, the adults were removed to obtain 1-day-old eggs (E0). The E0 eggs (150 eggs) were evenly divided into three groups: g0, g1 and g2. The rearing conditions for g0, g1, and g2 corresponded to the conditions for LBhp, LBmp and LBlp, respectively. Fitness parameters of L. bostrychophila were recorded, and developmental durations, survival rates, lifespans, reproductive periods, and reproductive abilities at each stage were analyzed using the TWOSEX-MSChart software (Version 5/7, 2024) [41]. Population growth parameters, including generation time (T), net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), and finite rate of increase (λ), were calculated [42,43,44,45].

2.5. Data Statistics and Analysis

The age–stage specific survival rate (Sxj), female adult age-stage reproductive value (fxj), population age–stage specific survival rate (lx), population age-specific fecundity (mx), population age-specific net reproductive rate (lxmx), and specific age–stage reproductive value (vxj) were derived using the TWOSEX-MS Chart software and plotted using Origin 2021 software. The mean values and standard errors of life table parameters were calculated using the bootstrap method. The Paired Bootstrap Test (TWOSEX-MS Chart) program was used to estimate the significance (p < 0.05) of differences in population growth parameters and the fecundity of L. bostrychophila with different Rickettsia abundances [41,44]. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using IBM SPSS 27 software to analyze the differences in developmental time, nymphal stage duration, longevity, pre-oviposition period, oviposition period, and fecundity. Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05) was used to assess statistical differences between means.

3. Results

3.1. Dominant Symbiotic Bacterial Species in L. bostrychophila

Based on the metagenomic sequencing results of the symbiotic bacteria in L. bostrychophila, a total of 51 genera were identified, with the dominant genus being Rickettsia (84.11–98.16%). At the species level, the dominant species was R. felis (66.17–78.45%), as shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Quantification of Rickettsia

The melt curve displayed a clear single peak, as shown in Figure 2, with no non-specific amplification products or primer dimers, indicating that the Rickettsia genus-specific target gene Rb amplification product was specific, and that the primers were suitable for quantitative analysis of the Rb gene. The standard curve obtained for the plasmid was Y = −2.968x + 36.14, with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.999, as shown in Figure 3, indicating a good linear relationship between the Ct values and the log values of plasmid copy numbers.

3.3. Diverse Rickettsia Abundance System

The adult insects observed from eclosion to one-week post-eclosion are illustrated in Figure 4. Significant differences in Rickettsia abundance were noted among the a0, a1, and a2 populations, demonstrating the successful establishment of a differential system for the dominant symbiotic bacterium Rickettsia in L. bostrychophila. The a0 population, cultured at a temperature of (28 ± 1) °C, showed the highest Rickettsia abundance, categorizing it as LBhp. The a1 population, maintained at (35 ± 1) °C, had a medium level of Rickettsia abundance; thus, it is referred to as LBmp. The a2 population, cultured at (37 ± 1) °C, exhibited the lowest Rickettsia abundance, and is classified as LBlp. Although we conducted experiments under different temperature conditions, we did not observe the complete disappearance of Rickettsia at any temperature. No significant differences in Rickettsia abundance were observed among the a0, a1, and a2 populations across early developmental stages (egg, first nymph, and second nymph). However, significant differences were found between the a0 and a2 populations at the third nymph stage, and between the a0 population and both the a1 and a2 populations at the adult stage.

3.4. Life Table Parameters of L. bostrychophila at Varying Levels of Rickettsia Abundance

The egg hatching times of L. bostrychophila in LBhp (g0 group), LBmp (g1 group), and LBlp (g2 group) were significantly different (see Table 1). Compared to LBhp, the hatching times were significantly shorter in the LBmp and LBlp groups, with hatching durations of 7.98 days, 5.64 days, and 6.87 days, respectively. In terms of nymph development, both the LBmp and LBlp groups had three instars, while the LBhp group had four instars. As the abundance of the dominant symbiotic bacteria decreased, the lifespan of L. bostrychophila was significantly reduced, resulting in lifespans of 217.4 days for LBhp, 121.98 days for LBmp, and 63.88 days for LBlp. Additionally, fecundity significantly declined, with egg production recorded at 155.56, 72.71, and 0.00 eggs for the LBhp, LBmp, and LBlp groups, respectively. No males were recorded at any of the experimental temperatures.

3.5. Population Parameters of L. bostrychophila at Varying Levels of Rickettsia Abundance

The population parameters were analyzed using the bootstrap method. The results indicated that the generation time (T), net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic growth rate (r), finite rate of increase (λ), and fecundity of LBhp were significantly higher than those of LBmp and LBlp. The LBlp exhibited an inability to lay eggs normally, as shown in Table 2.

3.6. Sxj of L. bostrychophila at Varying Levels of Rickettsia Abundance

The Sxj of L. bostrychophila populations with varying Rickettsia abundances are illustrated in Figure 5. The data indicate that Rickettsia abundance significantly affects the survival rate of L. bostrychophila. Specifically, compared to LBhp, the survival rate of adult L. bostrychophila was markedly lower in LBmp and LBlp. Among the different populations, LBhp exhibited the highest peak survival rate and the longest lifespan, followed by LBmp. In contrast, LBlp had the lowest peak survival rate and the shortest lifespan. Overall, a decrease in Rickettsia abundance correlated with a decline in the lifespan of L. bostrychophila.

3.7. lx and mx of L. bostrychophila at Varying Levels of Rickettsia Abundance

The lx of L. bostrychophila in LBhp began to decline from 120 days, and as the age increased, lx gradually decreased from 98% to 0%, as shown in Figure 6a. In LBmp, lx started to decline from 10 days, dropping to 90% by 11 days. After that, lx value remained relatively stable between 11 days and 81 days, then gradually decreased from 90% to 0%, as shown in Figure 6b. In LBlp, lx started to decline from day 10, reaching 66% by 13 days. After that, lx remained stable between 13 days and 51 days, then gradually decreased from 66% to 0%, as shown in Figure 6c. The fxj of female L. bostrychophila in both LBhp and LBmp showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing. However, the peak of the fecundity in LBmp was higher than in LBhp, and the duration was shorter. The LBlp was unable to lay eggs, and its fecundity remained at 0.
The vxj curve of L. bostrychophila in LBhp exhibited periodic fluctuations, with a peak value of 17.61 occurring at 23 days, as shown in Figure 7a. The vxj curve of L. bostrychophila in LBmp was unimodal, with a peak value of 20.40 occurring at 17 days, as shown in Figure 7b. Although the peak reproductive value in LBmp was higher and occurred earlier, it rapidly declined to 0 after the peak. In contrast, the reproductive value in LBhp decreased more slowly after reaching its peak, maintaining a value of 12.61 on 78 days.

4. Discussion

Regarding the role of Rickettsia in L. bostrychophila, the metagenomic results revealed that the symbiotic microbiome of L. bostrychophila collected from Hubei is complex and composed of various microorganisms. This differs from previous studies using PCR or RT-PCR techniques, which showed that L. bostrychophila would be infected with Rickettsia, Wolbachia, or Cardinium [35,36,38,39]. The results indicate that Rickettsia was the dominant genus in the symbiotic microbiome of L. bostrychophila, consistent with the findings of Perotti [39], with the dominant species being R. feli.
As for the impact of Rickettsia on the biological characteristics of L. bostrychophila, by controlling the growth temperature of L. bostrychophila at 28 °C, 35 °C, and 37 °C, significant differences in the abundance of Rickettsia infection were observed. This aligns with findings from studies on L. tricolor [46], providing valuable insights for future research on the relationship between the abundance of different symbiotic bacteria and their hosts. Furthermore, since the temperature range examined in this study is similar to the environmental conditions where L. bostrychophila is found in the field—specifically, warm and humid environments, with a preference for temperatures between 20 °C and 42 °C [47]—this research has potential practical applications and offers important reference values.
In this study, we found that the fitness of L. bostrychophila is closely linked to the abundance of the symbiotic bacterium Rickettsia. Changes in Rickettsia abundance significantly affected several biological indicators of L. bostrychophila, including egg production, survival rate, and longevity. Specifically, we observed that egg production in L. bostrychophila was notably reduced when Rickettsia abundance decreased. Similarly, Yusuf’s research indicated that egg production in L. bostrychophila significantly declined following the removal of Rickettsia [34]. Perotti’s study found a dramatic decrease of approximately 90% in egg production after Rickettsia was eliminated through heat treatment at 37 °C [39]. However, our results showed that at 37 °C, L. bostrychophila was unable to lay eggs after developing from egg to adult, which differs from Perotti’s findings.
The reduction in Rickettsia abundance significantly impacted the age–stage specific survival rate (Sxj), which accurately reflects the survival and aging differentiation of L. bostrychophila populations. Our study revealed that nymph survival peaked in both LBhp and LBmp, and was significantly higher than in LBlp. Furthermore, both the peak adult survival rate and its duration were much longer in LBhp compared to LBmp and LBlp. Additionally, the longevity of L. bostrychophila decreased as Rickettsia abundance diminished. These results are similar to those of a study on the effects of the endosymbiont Rickettsia on the biological characteristics of the whitefly, where Rickettsia infection was found to be able to extend the lifespan of adult whiteflies [48]. Overall, the reduction in Rickettsia abundance considerably lowered the fitness of L. bostrychophila. In terms of Rickettsia’s effects on other hosts, some research has shown that Rickettsia infection can enhance the survival and reproductive capacity of the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci [49], which aligns with our findings. However, Rickettsia did not significantly affect the fitness of the sweet potato whitefly, B. tabaci [50]. Moreover, some studies indicated that Rickettsia had minimal impact on the embryo development and egg-laying of Ixodes pacificus ticks [51]. Chen’s research also found that Rickettsia led to a decrease in the reproductive capacity of pea aphids, Acythosiphon pisum [21]. These findings underscore that the impact of Rickettsia on the fitness of different insect species varies.
In this study, we did not specifically assess the potential role of Rickettsia as a reproductive control factor. However, previous studies have shown that Rickettsia can induce changes in reproductive patterns in some species. For example, Rickettsia can cause parthenogenesis in the parasitoid wasp Neochrysocharis formosa and the parasitic wasp Pnigalio soemius [52]. These findings suggest that Rickettsia may have reproductive control potential in some insect species. Whether Rickettsia induces parthenogenesis in the L. bostrychophila is worth exploring further in future studies.
Our study results indicate that Rickettsia was the dominant endosymbiont in L. bostrychophila and had a significant impact on its fitness. However, the diversity of symbiotic microorganisms in insects is influenced by various factors, and the diversity and proportions of these microorganisms may vary among different geographic populations. Additionally, symbiotic bacteria in insects often collaborate to perform specific functions, such as cellulose degradation or the synthesis of essential amino acids [53]. It is important to note that this study focused on a single geographic strain of L. bostrychophila, leaving us uncertain about whether the diversity of symbionts and their associated functions are consistent across other populations. Future research should aim to collect additional geographic strains of L. bostrychophila for more comprehensive investigation. In our research, we observed that differences in endosymbiont abundance were influenced by developmental temperatures following egg laying, which may be related to temperature variations. Therefore, the research system needs to be optimized to better understand the relationship between Rickettsia and L. bostrychophila.

5. Conclusions

Rickettsia serves as a secondary endosymbiont in L. bostrychophila and plays a crucial role in its biological processes. In this study, we utilized metagenomic techniques to investigate the diversity of symbiotic bacteria present in L. bostrychophila. Our results indicated that Rickettsia has the highest relative abundance and is identified as the dominant endosymbiont in this organism. We created populations of L. bostrychophila with varying levels of Rickettsia abundance by controlling the temperature and further examined how these varying levels affected the fitness of L. bostrychophila. The findings revealed that as the abundance of Rickettsia decreased, the fitness of L. bostrychophila significantly declined. However, due to the study’s limitations, further in-depth research is necessary to gain a better understanding of Rickettsia’s specific effects on egg-laying and development in L. bostrychophila, as well as the underlying mechanisms involved.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16040349/s1, Quantification of Rickettsia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B.; methodology, C.B. and Y.D.; software, C.Z., L.Y. and D.S.; validation, J.L.; formal analysis, Y.B.; investigation, C.B. and Y.D.; resources, C.B.; data curation, Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.B. and Y.D.; writing—review and editing, F.Z. and M.Z.; visualization, J.L. and Y.B.; supervision, C.B.; project administration, C.B.; funding acquisition, C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32172260.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Hsin Chi for their assistance with the TWOSEX-MS Chart software application and analysis. We thank our colleagues working at the grain reserve depots for their assistance in collecting booklice specimens. We would also like to thank the graduate and undergraduate students (Guo Xu, Zhang Kaizhi, etc.) in our laboratory for their diligent efforts in insect cultivation and preliminary exploratory experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare no conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests, relationships, and affiliations.

References

  1. Abu El-Hassan, G.M.M.; Alfarraj, S.A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Atiya, N.H. Survey of insect pests in the manuscripts library of Coptic museum in Egypt. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5061–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, G.; Gu, A.; Wei, L. Regularity in distribution, and control, of pests in the hall of mental cultivation, the Forbidden City, Beijing, China. Herit. Sci. 2021, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmedani, M.S.; Shagufta, N.; Muhammad, A.; Hussnain, A. Psocid: A new risk for global food security and safety. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2010, 45, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kučerová, Z. Weight losses of wheat grain caused by psocid infestation (Liposcelis bostrychophila: Liposcelididae: Psocoptera). Plant Prot. Sci. 2002, 38, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nayak, M.K.; Collins, P.J.; Throne, J.E.; Wang, J.J. Biology and management of psocids infesting stored products. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Turner, B.D.; Maude-Roxby, H. Starvation survival of the stored product pest L. bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera, Liposcelidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1988, 24, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fukutomi, Y.; Kawakami, Y.; Taniguchi, M.; Saito, A.; Fukuda, A.; Yasueda, H.; Nakazawa, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Nakamura, H.; Akiyama, K. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of booklice (Liposcelis bostrichophila): A common household insect pest in Japan. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2012, 157, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mediannikov, O.; Bechah, Y.; Amanzougaghene, N.; Lepidi, H.; Bassene, H.; Sambou, M.; Lienhard, C.; Benkacimi, L.; Dieme, C.; Sokhna, C. Booklice L. bostrychophila naturally infected by Rickettsia felis cause fever and experimental pneumonia in mammals. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 226, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishibashi, O.; Sakuragi, K.; Fukutomi, Y.; Kawakami, Y.; Kamata, Y.; Sakurai, M.; Nakayama, S.; Uchiyama, H.; Kobayashi, H.; Kojima, H. Lip b 1 is a novel allergenic protein isolated from the booklouse, L. bostrychophila. Allergy 2017, 72, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, D.-D.; He, W.; Miao, Z.Q.; Tu, Y.Q.; Wang, L.; Dou, W.; Wang, J.J. Characterization of esterase genes involving malathion detoxification and establishment of an RNA interference method in L. bostrychophila. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Santoso, T.; Sunjaya, S.; Dharmaputra, O.; Halid, H.; Hodges, R. Pest management of psocids in milled rice stores in the humid tropics. Int. J. Pest Manag. 1996, 42, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lewis, Z.; Lizé, A. Insect behaviour and the microbiome. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2015, 9, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McCutcheon, J.P. The genomics and cell biology of host-beneficial intracellular infections. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 37, 115–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moran, N.; Baumann, P. Phylogenetics of cytoplasmically inherited microorganisms of arthropods. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moran, N.A.; McCutcheon, J.P.; Nakabachi, A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2008, 42, 165–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dale, C.; Moran, N.A. Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts. Cell 2006, 126, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baumann, P. Biology of bacteriocyte-associated endosymbionts of plant sap-sucking insects. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Douglas, A.E. Multiorganismal insects: Diversity and function of resident microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Łukasik, P.; Kolasa, M.R. With a little help from my friends: The roles of microbial symbionts in insect populations and communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2024, 379, 20230122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suh, E.; Mercer, D.R.; Dobson, S.L. Life-shortening Wolbachia infection reduces population growth of Aedes aegypti. Acta Trop. 2017, 172, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, D.Q.; Montllor, C.B.; Purcell, A.H. Fitness effects of two facultative endosymbiotic bacteria on the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and the blue alfalfa aphid, A. kondoi. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2000, 95, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hickin, M.L.; Kakumanu, M.L.; Schal, C. Effects of Wolbachia Elimination and B-Vitamin Supplementation on Bed Bug Development and Reproduction. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giorgini, M.; Bernardo, U.; Monti, M.; Nappo, A.; Gebiola, M. Rickettsia symbionts cause parthenogenetic reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2589–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kikuchi, Y.; Hayatsu, M.; Hosokawa, T.; Nagayama, A.; Tago, K.; Fukatsu, T. Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8618–8622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brumin, M.; Kontsedalov, S.; Ghanim, M. Rickettsia influences thermotolerance in the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci B biotype. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. O’Neill, S.L.; Giordano, R.; Colbert, A.; Karr, T.L.; Robertson, H.M. 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 2699–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raina, H.S.; Singh, A.; Popli, S.; Pandey, N.; Rajagopal, R. Infection of bacterial endosymbionts in insects: A comparative study of two techniques viz PCR and FISH for detection and localization of symbionts in Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guyomar, C.; Legeai, F.; Jousselin, E.; Mougel, C.; Lemaitre, C.; Simon, J.C. Multi-scale characterization of symbiont diversity in the pea aphid complex through metagenomic approaches. Microbiome 2018, 6, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chellappan, M.; Ranjith, M.T. Metagenomic approaches for insect symbionts. In Microbial Approaches for Insect Pest Management; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 271–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nedoluzhko, A.V.; Sharko, F.S.; Tsygankova, S.V.; Boulygina, E.S.; Sokolov, A.S.; Rastorguev, S.M.; Kadnikov, V.V.; Mardanov, A.V.; Ravin, N.V.; Mazur, A.N. Metagenomic analysis of microbial community of a parasitoid wasp Megaphragma amalphitanum. Genom. Data 2017, 11, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Geethu, S.; Jayaprakas, C.A.; Harish, E.R. Metagenomic DNA analysis of bacterial communities associated with striped mealy bugs, Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) infesting Cassava. J. Entomol. Res. 2023, 47, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dudek, K.; Humińska, K.; Wojciechowicz, J.; Tryjanowski, P. Metagenomic survey of bacteria associated with the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2017, 114, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ashraf, H.J.; Ramos Aguila, L.C.; Akutse, K.S.; Ilyas, M.; Abbasi, A.; Li, X.; Wang, L. Comparative microbiome analysis of Diaphorina citri and its associated parasitoids Tamarixia radiata and Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis reveals Wolbachia as a dominant endosymbiont. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 1638–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yusuf, M.; Turner, B.S.; Whitfield, P.J.; Miles, R.J.; Pacey, J.A. Electron microscopical evidence of a vertically transmitted Wolbachia-like parasite in the parthenogenetic, stored-product pest L. bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2000, 36, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yusuf, M.; Turner, B. Characterisation of Wolbachia-like bacteria isolated from the parthenogenetic stored-product pest psocid L. bostrychophila (Badonnel) (Psocoptera). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2004, 40, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mikac, K.M. PCR Confirms Multiple Wolbachia Strain Infection in Australian and International Populations of the Invasive Stored-Product Psocid L. bostrychophila Badonnel. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 594–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Z.Y. The Symbiotic Relationship of Several Psocid Species and Their Endosymbionts. Ph.D. Thesis, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.J.; Dong, P.; Xiao, L.S.; Dou, W. Effects of removal of Cardinium infection on fitness of the stored-product pest L. bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perotti, M.A.; Clarke, H.K.; Turner, B.D.; Braig, H.R. Rickettsia as obligate and mycetomic bacteria. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2372–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Behar, A.; McCormick, L.J.; Perlman, S.J. Rickettsia felis Infection in a Common Household Insect Pest, L. bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2280–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chi, H.; Kavousi, A.; Gharekhani, G.; Atlıhan, R.; Özgökçe, M.; Güncan, A.; Gökçe, A.; Smith, C.; Benelli, G.; Guedes, R.N.; et al. Advances in theory, data analysis, and application of the age-stage, two-sex life table for demographic research, biological control, and pest management. Entomol. Gen. 2023, 43, 705–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chi, H.; Güncan, A.; Kavousi, A.; Gharakhani, G.; Atlihan, R.; Özgökçe, M.S.; Shirazi, J.; Amir-Maafi, M.; Maroufpoor, M.; Taghizadeh, R. TWOSEX-MSChart: The key tool for life table research and education. Entomol. Gen. 2022, 42, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chi, H.; You, M.; Atlıhan, R.; Smith, C.L.; Kavousi, A.; Özgökçe, M.S.; Güncan, A.; Tuan, S.-J.; Fu, J.-W.; Xu, Y.-Y.; et al. Age-stage, two-sex life table: An introduction to theory, data analysis, and application. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 40, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jia, F.X. Effect of Continuous High-Temperature Stress on the Symbiosis Rate of Wolbachia and Population Fitness in Liposcelis tricolor. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Throne, J.E.; Flinn, P.W. Distribution of Psocids (Psocoptera) in Temperature Gradients in Stored Wheat. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2013, 55, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shi, P.; An, X.; Qiu, B.L. Effects of the endosymbiont Rickettsia on the biological characteristics of whiteflies. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2020, 57, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fan, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.; He, Z.Q.; Wen, Q.; Chen, X.-Y.; Khan, M.M.; Osman, M.; Mandour, N.S.; Qiu, B.-L. Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense. Insects 2022, 13, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chiel, E.; Inbar, M.; Mozes-Daube, N.; White, J.; Hunter, M.; Zchori-Fein, E. Assessments of Fitness Effects by the Facultative Symbiont Rickettsia in the Sweet potato Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kurlovs, A.H.; Li, J.; Cheng, D.; Zhong, J. Ixodes pacificus Ticks Maintain Embryogenesis and Egg Hatching After Antibiotic Treatment of Rickettsia Endosymbiont. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hagimori, T.; Abe, Y.; Date, S.; Miura, K. The first finding of a Rickettsia bacterium associated with parthenogenesis induction among insects. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wei, X.Y.; Guo, C.L.; Chu, D. Research progress on the factors affecting microbial diversity in insects. J. Biol. Saf. 2019, 28, 170–176. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Multilevel species composition chart of endosymbiotic bacteria of L. bostrychophila. (a) HBSJ1; (b) HBSJ2; (c) HBSJ3.
Figure 1. Multilevel species composition chart of endosymbiotic bacteria of L. bostrychophila. (a) HBSJ1; (b) HBSJ2; (c) HBSJ3.
Insects 16 00349 g001
Figure 2. Rb gene dissolution curve.
Figure 2. Rb gene dissolution curve.
Insects 16 00349 g002
Figure 3. Rb gene qPCR standard curve.
Figure 3. Rb gene qPCR standard curve.
Insects 16 00349 g003
Figure 4. Copy number of Rickettsia in L. bostrychophila at different temperatures. Scale bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Copy number of Rickettsia in L. bostrychophila at different temperatures. Scale bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00349 g004
Figure 5. Sxj curve of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp; (c) LBlp.
Figure 5. Sxj curve of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp; (c) LBlp.
Insects 16 00349 g005
Figure 6. The population age–stage specific survival rate (lx), female adult age–stage specific fecundity (fxj), population age-specific fecundity (mx), and population age-specific net reproductive rates (lxmx) of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp; (c) LBlp.
Figure 6. The population age–stage specific survival rate (lx), female adult age–stage specific fecundity (fxj), population age-specific fecundity (mx), and population age-specific net reproductive rates (lxmx) of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp; (c) LBlp.
Insects 16 00349 g006
Figure 7. The age–stage specific reproductive value (vxj) of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp.
Figure 7. The age–stage specific reproductive value (vxj) of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance. (a) LBhp; (b) LBmp.
Insects 16 00349 g007
Table 1. Life table parameters of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance.
Table 1. Life table parameters of L. bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance.
Levels of Rickettsia AbundanceDevelopmental Periods (d)Longevity (d)Adult Preoviposition Period (d)Oviposition Period (d)Fecundity
(Eggs/Female)
Egg (d)First Nymphs (d) Second Nymphs (d) Third Nymphs (d) Fourth Nymphs (d)Nymph
Period (d)
LBhp7.98 ± 0.05 a3.06 ± 0.13 a2.78 ± 0.16 a3.42 ± 0.22 a2.94 ± 0.15 a12.2 ± 0.17 a217.4 ± 5.70 a1.54 ± 0.12 a176.66 ± 5.59 a155.56 ± 3.87 a
LBmp5.64 ± 0.11 b4.9 ± 0.18 b3.22 ± 0.14 a1.98 ± 0.12 b10.11 ± 0.19 b121.98 ± 3.00 b0.84 ± 0.14 b55.42 ± 2.87 b72.71 ± 2.06 b
LBlp6.87 ± 0.14 c5.8 ± 0.38 c4.45 ± 0.35 b3.18 ± 0.29 a13.88 ± 0.14 c63.88 ± 1.03 c0.00 ± 0.00 c0.00 ± 0.00 c0.00 ± 0.00 c
Note: The data in the table are expressed as mean ± standard error. Different letters within the same row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). In this table, all instances of “d” represent “days”.
Table 2. The population parameters of L.bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance.
Table 2. The population parameters of L.bostrychophila at varying levels of Rickettsia abundance.
ParameterLevels of Rickettsia Abundance
LBhpLBmpLBlp
T39.27 ± 0.50 a25.11 ± 0.21 b
R0155.56 ± 3.84 a65.44 ± 3.59 b
r0.13 ± 0.002 b0.17 ± 0.003 a
λ1.14 ± 0.002 b1.18 ± 0.003 a
Note: The data in the table are expressed as mean ± standard error. Different letters within the same row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, C.; Duan, Y.; Zhao, C.; Yan, L.; Suthisut, D.; Lü, J.; Bai, Y.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, M. Abundance of the Dominant Endosymbiont Rickettsia and Fitness of the Stored-Product Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Insects 2025, 16, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040349

AMA Style

Bai C, Duan Y, Zhao C, Yan L, Suthisut D, Lü J, Bai Y, Zeng F, Zhang M. Abundance of the Dominant Endosymbiont Rickettsia and Fitness of the Stored-Product Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Insects. 2025; 16(4):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Chunqi, Yiwen Duan, Chao Zhao, Lei Yan, Duangsamorn Suthisut, Jianhua Lü, Yueliang Bai, Fangfang Zeng, and Meng Zhang. 2025. "Abundance of the Dominant Endosymbiont Rickettsia and Fitness of the Stored-Product Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae)" Insects 16, no. 4: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040349

APA Style

Bai, C., Duan, Y., Zhao, C., Yan, L., Suthisut, D., Lü, J., Bai, Y., Zeng, F., & Zhang, M. (2025). Abundance of the Dominant Endosymbiont Rickettsia and Fitness of the Stored-Product Pest Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Insects, 16(4), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop